Free Energy for all: Are we Closer to Teslas Dream? J asmina Vujic 1 Abstract Many projections envision doubling of energy use and tripling of electricity demand within a half century. Overwhelming dependence on fossil fuel with increasing emissions of greenhouse gases will eventually lead to the dramatic change from fossil fuel- based energy infrastructure to more reliable, abundant, affordable, clean, and secure source of energy for entire world. It is interesting to compare how Nikola Tesla envisioned to solve energy problems of the world more than one hundred years ago, and what are the most promising options that we consider today. Keywords Free Energy, Nikola Tesla Envisioned. I. INTRODUCTION Since the late 19 th century, our society and the world have become totally dependent on electrical energy. The needs of billions of people, particularly in developing countries, require dramatic increases in affordable and clean energy supply, which is currently dominated by fossil fuel-based energy sources. We witness today global competition for natural resources (particularly oil and natural gas) that leads to instability, wars and lack of energy security in many regions in the World. It is interesting to point out that the U.S. National Academy of Engineering (NAE) chose Electrification as the greatest engineering achievements of the twentieth century [15]: 1. Electrification, 2. Automobiles, 3. Airplanes, 4. Waters supply and distribution, 5. Electronics, 6. Radio and Television, 7. Agricultural Mechanization, 8. Computers, 9. Telephone, 10. Air Conditioning and Refrigeration, 11. Highways, 12. Spacecraft 13. Internet, 14. Imaging, 15. Household Appliances, 16. Health Technologies, 17. Petrochemical Technologies, 18. Laser and Fiber Optics, 19. Nuclear Technology, 20. High-Performance Materials. The list was announced during the National Engineering Week by astronaut/engineer Neil Armstrong on behalf of NAE at a National Press Club luncheon in February, 2000. In his presentation Neil Armstrong, the first man on the Moon, said jokingly that his astronomic feat did not even rank among the top 10 engineering achievements.
----------- 1 J asmina Vujic Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA vujic@nuc.berkeley.edu In fact, space exploration came 12th, right before the Internet and right after highways. Widespread electrification was chosen based on the key criterion of improving the quality of life for the most people and the conclusion that nothing else on the list would have been possible without the widespread electrification! The explanation that appears on the NAE Web presentation still does not give full credit to Nikola Tesla for his contributions to the widespread electrification of the World: "At the start of the 20th Century, electric power was young but growing rapidly. Thomas Edison's work had led to the first commercial power plant for incandescent lighting and power in 1882. However, Edison's system used direct current (DC), which could only be profitably distributed in a limited area around the generating station. The work of engineers such as Nikola Tesla and Charles Steinmetz led to the successful commercialization of alternating current (AC), which enabled transmission of high-voltage power over large distances." If we were to predict the greatest engineering achievements of the 21st Century, it should be SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY that must rely on SUSTAINABLE ENERGY.
The definition of sustainable energy is provided in the MIT study Sustainable Energy - Choosing Among Options [21]: (Sustainable energy is) A living harmony between the equitable availability of energy services to all people and the preservation of the earth for future generations. Regarding the preservation of the earth for future generations, there are serious concerns about climate change and global warming. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [22], climate warming over the last 50 years is likely due to increased concentrations of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, which is generated almost entirely by fossil fuels like coal and oil burned for energy. This study compared the observed changes in average temperature since 1850, with two models one including the climate changes due natural causes and the second model including climate changes due to natural causes and human generated greenhouse gases (Fig. 1). Ratified by more than 140 nations accounting for 62% of developed countries' greenhouse gas emissions, the Kyoto Protocol has now entered into force. It requires the 34 industrialized countries to reduce emissions by an average of 5.2% by 2012. Unfortunately, the USA has not signed the Kyoto Protocol. Figure 2 presents comparison of major sources for electricity production regarding the emission of CO 2 -equivalent per kWh. The biggest contributors are coal and gas, while nuclear energy is basically emission-free.
a) b) Figure 1. (a) Model includes climate changes due to natural causes (solar variations, volcanoes, etc.), (b) Model includes climate changes due to natural causes and human generated greenhouse gases.
Figure 2. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Electricity Production
This fact was also recognized by major environmental guru, Patrick Moore, Greenpeace founder and environmental activist. He testified on April 28, 2005 before the U.S. House of Representatives Government Reform Energy and Resources Subcommittee, that: Nuclear energy is the only non- greenhouse-gas-emitting source that can effectively replace fossil fuels and satisfy global demands. He also warned his fellow environmentalists at the UN Climate Change Conference (Montreal, Dec 5, 2005), that Energy decisions must be based more on science and less on politics and emotion. There is a great deal of scientific evidence showing nuclear power to be environmentally sound and safe choice. In this paper we compare how Nikola Tesla envisioned to solve energy problems of the world more than one hundred years ago, and what are the most promising options that we consider today. II. NIKOLA TESLA, HIS INVENTIONS AND HIS VISIONS Nikola Tesla was a visionary genius whose sometimes radical ideas established the basis for everything that now powers our world with energy and information. Without his inventions the widespread electrification that touched the majority of people on the planet would not have been possible. In writings about Tesla, one often finds statements such as that he invented the twentieth century or the twenty first century, or even that he invented the future. Dr. J ames Corum, one of the scientists continuing Teslas work, summarizes poetically Teslas contributions: The electrical power flowing from our great generators, illuminating our vast cities, dispelling the inky blackness of the night, and the telecommunications cohesively linking the homes and businesses of our civilization, across continents, around the globe and through the distant reaches of space - these are all monuments testifying to the successful life of this little known, but uniquely admirable, scientist, inventor, engineer, futurist, and citizen of the world. [1] Tesla was also a visionary thinker, who conceived many ideas, some controversial, which are related to several of today's mainstream technologies ranging from wireless communication systems, radar, television broadcasting, robotics, computers, faxes, Internet, and even the U.S. Strategic Defense Initiative. However, he is still not recognized for many of his fundamental inventions. Such is the case of radio for which even the U.S. Supreme Court in 1943 determined Tesla as inventor. Tesla is one of only two Americans to have a unit of electrical measurement named in his honor. The Discovery of the Rotating Magnetic Field. Tesla's discovery of the rotating magnetic field produced by the interactions of two and three phase alternating currents in a motor winding was one of his most significant achievements, and formed the basis of his induction motor and polyphase system for the generation and transmission of electricity. Thanks to this invention, large amounts of electrical power could be generated and transmitted efficiently over long distances. To this day, the three-phase form of Tesla's polyphase system is used for the generation and transmission of electricity. [3,4,9] The Discovery of the Tesla Coil and Transformer. His experiments with high frequency and high potential alternating currents resulted in the development of the Tesla coil which is still used as a major component in numerous electronic devices. As part of other experiments Tesla also developed the precursors of modern neon and florescent lights. [3,9,10] War of the Currents. In May 1885, George Westinghouse, head of the Westinghouse Electric Company in Pittsburgh, bought the patent rights to Tesla's polyphase system of alternating-current (AC) dynamos, transformers, and motors. There was a power struggle between Edison's direct-current systems and the Tesla-Westinghouse alternating-current approach. Edison's role in the electrical power industry was minimal. It was Nikola Tesla's discovery of the rotating magnetic field principle in 1882 and patented in 1888 that gave us our modern-day system of electrical power distribution. [2,5,7,11] Niagara Falls. In October 1893 the Niagara Falls Commission awarded Westinghouse a contract to build the power plant at the Niagara Falls, using the generators that Tesla has designed. Teslas polyphase system was used throughout the project. The first three Niagara AC generators went on line November 16, 1896. The evolution of electric power, from the discovery of Faradey in 1831 to the initial great installation of the Tesla polyphase system in 1896, is undoubtedly the most tremendous event in all engineering history (Charles E. Scott, 1943) [7] The Great Radio Controversy. Marconi was the first to send a message across the ocean and, and thus, he is partly responsible for 'developing' radio...but he did NOT invent it. Tesla did. On J une 21, 1943, the United States Supreme Court made a landmark decision that essentially settled the long dispute between Marconi and Tesla. The court's decision, Case No. 369, identified as "Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America vs. United States," rendered invalid Marconi's basic patent No. 763,772 dated J une 28, 1904. Tesla's patent No. 645,576 of March 20, 1900, and its subdivision patent for apparatus No. 649,621 dated May 15, 1900, had priority. [2,5,7] Remote Control and Automation. In 1898, at the first Electrical Exhibition in Madison Square Garden, Tesla demonstrated the worlds first radio-controlled robot boat. Tesla applied his receivers and transmitters in remote ship control, and he was granted a patent in 1898 for The Method of and Apparatus for Controlling Mechanism of Moving Vessels or Vehicles- Teslas patent No. 613,809 of November 8, 1898. This invention made Tesla an originator of remote control. Unfortunately, as with many of Teslas inventions, this invention was so far ahead of its time that those who observed it could not imagine its practical applications.[2,5,7,8]
2.1.Teslas visionary ideas [19]
The present is theirs; the future, for which I really worked, is mine. TESLA In his visionary ideas Tesla was so far ahead of his time, so much a visionary, that his contemporary scientists really didn't understand what he was doing. We witness today realization of some of Teslas visionary ideas, that he envisioned at the end of 19th and the beginning of 20th century. This created a great difficulty for Tesla and his ability to attract investors who would fund his research work. Only in few cases (such as collaboration with Westinghouse) he was able to fully complete his visions. In 1900, Tesla began construction on Long Island of a wireless world broadcasting tower (Wardenclyffe Tower), with $150,000 capital from the American financier J . Pierpont Morgan. Tesla was planning to provide worldwide communication with ability to send pictures, messages, weather warnings, and stock reports. The project was abandoned because of a financial panic, and Morgan's withdrawal of support. Among many Teslas visionary ideas, we will mention only few that came to realization only recently, or are still waiting to be utilized: (a) Global wireless system for transmission of signals and energy, (b) Remote control foundations, (c) Vertical takeoff aircraft (VTOL), (d) Use of geothermal energy, and (e) Vision of electrical future. [12] (a) Vision of Wireless Communication (Magnifying Transmitter patented 1914). In early 1990s Tesla wrote a telephone subscriber here may call up and talk to any other subscriber on the Globe. An inexpensive receiver, no bigger than a watch, will enable him to listen anywhere, on land or sea, to a speech delivered, or music played in some other place, however distant. Sounds familiar? It took a better part of the 20th century for this Tesla vision to be realized. He had three goals: to develop a transmitter of great power, to perfect means for individualizing and isolating the energy transmitted (e.g., signals), to establish the laws of propagation of currents through the earth and the atmosphere. [13, 14] He also talked about using the same system to transmit energy, making it a free resource. (b) Remote control foundations (Patented in 1898). Tesla laid the foundation of remote control systems (what he called teleautomation) in 1898 at the first Electrical Exhibition in Madison Square Garden. He demonstrated how the ships and mechanical gadgets could be controlled remotely using a wireless principle. In Teslas own words we can recognize the basis for what we call today Computers and even one step further Artificial Intelligence: [it will be able to follow a course laid out or obey commands given far in advance, it will be capable between what it ought and what it ought not to do and of recording impressions which will definitely affect its subsequent actions. (c) Vertical takeoff aircraft -VTOL (Patented in 1928). The initial idea appears in 1921. He envisioned a vertical take-off and landing aircraft, with combined helicopter and airplane features. Although he gave a thrust analysis of VTOL, it was never built by Tesla. However, VTOLs are in military use today (V-22 Osprey, for example). Tesla also envisioned a horseshoe- shaped VTOL with a horizontally placed turbine, which rides on a thin layer of air. Tesla never built it, but similarly designed hovercraft is commercially available today. [12] (d) Use of geothermal power. In 1931 Tesla discussed the design of the power plants based on the geothermal energy. The geothermal power today has a great role as one of the renewable energy sources. (e) Vision of electrical future. Teslas prediction include: The widespread use of hydro-electric power generation and of AC for transmission; electrical control of atmospheric moisture (not yet accomplished); use in appliances (refrigeration, etc.), lighting, and propulsion; use in agricultural domain: pest control, elimination of microbes, ; collision-preventing instruments; In a time not too distant it will be possible to flash any image formed in thought on a screen and render it visible at any place desired; a voice-operated typewriter; picture/text transmission (fax); electric guns and teleautomatic aerial torpedoes (cruise missile?). [12]
2.2. Teslas views on energy and todays needs of sustainable society In his papers [20] on The Problem of Increasing Human Energy (With Special Reference to the Harnessing of the Suns Energy) that originally appeared in Century Illustrated Monthly Magazine in J une 1900, on The Transmission of Electric Energy without Wires, that originally appeared in The Electric World and Engineer, in March 5, 1904, and on The Wonder World to be Created by Electricity, that originally appeared in Manufacturings Record in September 9, 1915, Tesla presented his visions of sustainable society with affordable energy to be transmitted wirelessly through the earth or air. The Sun is the past, the Earth is the present, the Moon is the future. From and incandescent mass we have originated and into frozen mass we shell turn. Amazingly, Tesla pinpoints more than 100 years ago the most important issues of concern to the human race even today: the need for limitless energy, clean water and healthy food. This precious fluid, which daily infuses new life into us, is likewise the chief vehicle through which disease and death enter our bodies. It should be made a rigid rule which might be enforced by law to boil or to sterilize otherwise the drinking water in every household and public space. Millions of individuals die yearly for want of food. Even in our enlightened communities, and not withstanding the many charitable effort, this is still, in all probability, the chief evil. In this manner many compounds of nitrogen may be manufactured all over the world, at a small cost, and in any desired amount, and by means of these compounds the soul can be fertilized and its productiveness indefinitely increased. An abundance of cheap and healthful food, not artificial, but such as we are accustomed to, may thus be obtained While talking about the power of the future, Tesla clearly analyses various energy sources know at that time, and points out their advantages and disadvantages: We have at our disposal three main sources of life-sustaining energy fuel, water-power and the heat from the sun. Engineers often speak of harnessing the tides, but the discouraging truth is that the tidewater over one acre of ground will, on the average, develop only one horse-power. Thousands of mechanics and inventors have spent their best efforts in trying to perfect wave motion, not realizing that the power so obtained could never compete with that derived from other sources. The force of wind offers much better chances and it is valuable in special instances, but is by far inadequate. Moreover, the tides, waves and winds furnish only periodic and often uncertain power and necessitate the employment of large and expensive storage plants If we use fuel (i.e., coal, oil gas - JV) to get our power, we are living on our own capital and exhausting it rapidly. This method is barbarous and wantonly wasteful, and will have to be stopped in the interest of coming generations. The heat of the suns rays represents an immense amount of energy vastly in excess of water-power. The earth receives an equivalent of 83 foot-pounds per second for each square foot on which rays fall perpendicularly. From simple geometric rules applying to a spherical body it follows that the mean rate per square foot of the earths surface is one-quarter of that, or 203/4 food-pounds. This is to say over one million horse-power per square mile, or 250 times the water-power for the same area. But that is only true in theory; the practical facts put this in a different aspect. For instance, considering United States, and taking into account the mean latitude, the daily variations, the diurnal changes, the seasonal variations and casual changes, this power of the suns rays reduces to about one- tenth, or 100,000 horse-power per square mile, of which we might be able to recover in high speed low-pressure turbines 10,000 horse-power. To do this would mean the installment of apparatus and storage plants so large and expensive that such a project is beyond the pale of practical. The inevitable conclusion is that the water-power is by far our most valuable resource. On this the humanity must build its hopes for the future. With its full development and a perfect system of wireless transmission of energy to any distance man will be able to solve all the problems of material existence. Distance, which is the chief impediment to human progress, will be completely annihilated in thought, word and action. Humanity will be united, wars will be impossible and peace will reign supreme.
Tesla considered affordable and abundant energy as the base of peaceful co-existence of human race. Recent definition of sustainable energy specifies [21]: A living harmony between the equitable availability of energy services to all people and the preservation of the earth for future generations. Lets see how todays comparison of energy sources looks like (TABLE 1). It is interesting to point out that Teslas analysis (excluding the nuclear power that did not exist at that time) matches the brief analysis presented in this table. Tesla believed that the hydro power is the most valuable and affordable source and it is still the case today. Figure 3 shows another way of comparing the real cost of various power sources if their capacity factors are taken into account. With very small capacity factors, cost per kWe of solar and wind power is several thousand dollar higher that that of coal and nuclear. An installed kW of wind power is not the same as an installed kW of base load coal and nuclear power, which run many more hours regardless of weather. So, the cost per kWe must be adjusted for average capacity factor. The red bar in Figure 3 represents the Effective Capacity, adjusted for downtime. [24] TABLE I PROS AND CONS IN THE CURRENT U.S. ENERGY SUPPLY
Source
% of U.S. Energy Supply Pros
Cons
Fossil Fuels Oil Natural Gas Coal 71 3 16 52 Inexpensive to construct (gas) and operate Domestically available (coal) Flexible Significant emissions Insecure supply (oil, gas) Price volatility (oil, gas) Nuclear 20 Essentially non- emitting Inexpensive to operate Domestically available Radioactive waste Expensive to construct Safety and proliferation concerns Hydropower 7
Essentially non- emitting Inexpensive to operate Domestically available
Environmental concerns Few opportunities for domestic expansion
Biomass
<1
Renewable Domestically available
Significant emissions Large land requirements
Other Renewables (e.g. solar, wind)
<1
Essentially non- emitting Renewable Domestically available Inexpensive to operate Expensive to construct Large land requirements Intermittent
Figure 3. The Real Cost of Power Sources Effected by Capacity Factors
A report by the German government's energy research agency supported by the supply companies and the wind industry has been withdrawn for re-editing due to its adverse findings. Mr Trittin, the Green Party environment minister, said that "we do not want the findings of this report to be misinterpreted". The 490-page report says that if Germany presses ahead to double the number of wind turbines as intended by 2015, annual energy costs for consumers (who actually subsidize wind energy) will rise from EUR 1.4 billion to EUR 5.4 billion. In addition the government will need to invest EUR 1.1 billion in grid infrastructure to cope with the fluctuation in wind-derived supply. The report also questions the greenhouse gas emission savings from increased wind power. News Telegraph 2/2/05. Also, during the periods of cheep gas prices, a large wave of gas turbines were built since 1998. However, today much of the capacity is in bankruptcy, or idle due to high gas prices. [24] In Fig. 4 shows [25] different distribution of electricity generation in developed countries, where coal, gas and oil still dominate (the only exception is Canada with large hydro power potential).
Figure 4. Percent of electricity generated by different sources If todays energy use in the World were distributed equally over the World population, each person would use about 60 trillion joules of energy [21]. Note that average US citizen uses 100 times more energy then the average person in Bangladesh, and that the World population is increasing it has tripled since the late 1930s. Thus, we have to make major changes in energy efficiency and affordability, in order to satisfy demands of sustainable society, reduce poverty, and reduce treat of climate changes due to greenhouse gas emissions.
III. THE ROLE OF NUCLEAR ENERGY IN SUSTAINABLE SOCIETY
When Wilhelm Rontgen discovered X-rays, Tesla has already experimented with similar tubes and produced the first X-ray images basically at the same time as Rontgen. However, Tesla was not into nuclear physics, and when neutron was discovered by Chadwick in 1932, Tesla was already 76 years old. The first self-sustained nuclear chain reaction happened on December 2, 1942, a month before Tesla died. Having this in mind, it is not surprising that Tesla did not envision use of another great source of power nuclear energy. The main advantages of using nuclear power is high energy density per kg of fuel. While the fossil fuel density is 2.9 x 10 7
J /kg, the fission energy density is 8.2 x 10 13 J /kg and the fusion energy density is 3.4 x 10 14 J /kg. Table II gives a comparison of 1 kg of Uranium fuel to the amount of Fuel Equivalent mass for different types of fuel. [24] TABLE II Fuel Equivalent Mass Comparison Fuel kg of fuel Uranium 1 Natural gas 14,000 Crude Oil 15,000 Coal (East) 22,000 Coal (West PRB) 33,000 Dry firewood 45,000 Solar power 70 Sq. KM Wind power 4000 turbines
Thus, fuel consumed by a 1000 MWe fission power plant is 3.2 kg/day, by a 1000 MWe fusion power plant is 0.6 kg/day, while up to 10,000 tons/day of coal is necessary for a 1000 MWe coal-burning plant. These data also give us an idea about the amount of waste that will be produced by each of these sources. Figure 5 shows that the electricity production cost of four major power sources. U.S. Electricity Production Costs 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 3 1 9 9 5 1 9 9 7 1 9 9 9 2 0 0 1 C e n t s / K W h
( 2 0 0 1
d o l l a r s ) Nuclear Coal Gas Oil
Figure 5. The electricity production cost in the USA
Nuclear production cost fell below coal (the cheapest is hydro) over the last several years this is the average over the 103 nuclear power plants in the US (presenting 110,000 MWe or 20% of electricity production). There are 440 nuclear power plants (NPPs) in the world, corresponding to 367,000 MWe or 16% of worlds electricity production. It must be pointed out that 440 nuclear power plants having no greenhouse gas emissions, displace about 2.5 billion metric tons of CO 2 per year. Over more then 50 years of commercial NPPs it has been shown that they are safe, performance is proven, production of electricity is cost effective and affordable, they present the base load generation of electricity, contribute to the grid stability and are emissions free (NPPs do not emit carbon dioxide nor other important regulated environmental pollutants (e.g., SOx, NOx, mercury). These facts are being realized by environmental leaders who are now supporting expansion of nuclear energy. Problem of highly radioactive spent fuel is being effectively resolved by closed cycle, transmutation of transuranics, and recycling of fissile fuel. One possible closed cycle is shown in Figure 6 [23], in which spent fuel from light water reactors (LWRs) is separated by UREX+process (ESD), transmutation fuel is fabricated in Advanced Fuel Cycle Facility (AFCF) and long-lived transuranics are burned in Advanced Burner Test Reactor (ABTR). Currently, a sodium-cooled fast reactor is proposed as ABTR.
Figure 6. Advanced closed fuel cycle, with fuel separation, transmutation fuel fabrication, and consumption of long-lived transuranics
Using the closed fuel cycle, the amount of radioactive waste will be considerably reduced, so that only one Yucca Mountain type repository will be needed, even if the US continues to add new NPPs in the future. The main reason is that the only waste that will go underground will be short-lived fission products, as shown in Fig. 7 [26]. While in the open cycle (i.e., once- though) scenario, the spent fuel is dominated by long-lived actinides, that will continue decaying and contributing to overall radiotoxicity and decay heat for hundreds of thousand of years, in the proposed closed cycle, the fission products decay our within the first few hundreds of years. The new strategy in the US regarding the broader use of nuclear power in the World is called the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP) [27], where a global system is envisioned of nuclear fuel supplier nations (that have nuclear technology) that will enable developing nations (that do not have nuclear technology) to affordably use nuclear energy without increasing the risk of nuclear proliferation. In addition, the new generation of advanced reactors (Generation IV) is currently in the phase of research and development, and most likely will be available after 2020. Generation IV will emphasize sustainability, i.e., economical and safe generations of nuclear electricity, nuclear heat (for district heating), and productions of hydrogen. The nuclear waste will be minimized by reprocessing of spent fuel and recycling of fissile fuel. Hydrogen production for the future hydrogen economy could be produced efficiently either by using cheep nuclear electricity in the process of electrolysis of water, or by using the heat as the by-product in the nuclear electricity generation, for a thermo-chemical production of hydrogen.
Figure 7. Radiotoxicity of spent fuel for different underground repository scenarios
IV. CONCLUSIONS Tesla clearly saw more that 100 years ago advantages and disadvantages of energy sources available at that time. He wanted to a peaceful World in which all people have access to abundant healthy food, clean water and affordable energy. Tesla concludes his paper on The Transmission of Electric Energy without Wires, [20] saying that the energy of a waterfall {will be} made available for supplying light, heat or motive power, anywhere on see, or land, or high in the air humanity will be like an ant heap stirred up with a stick: See excitement coming! In recently published book on sustainable energy [21], the following definition was used: the energy technologies are treated as sustainable if their net effects upon the biosphere do not significantly degrade its capabilities for supporting existing species in their current abundance and diversity. Thus, we have to satisfy increasing demand for energy, make the energy abundant and affordable for everybody, and we must not harm our environment in that process. The only major power source to fulfill these requirements is nuclear power, particularly new advanced designs with the closed fuel cycle including reprocessing and recycling of spent fuel. Thus, the answer to Teslas dream of providing free energy to all in a sustainable society is to rely on a SUSTAINABLE NUCLEAR ENERGY!
REFERENCES
[1] J ames Corum, On the Position of Nikola Tesla Among the Founders of Modern Electrical Science And Technology,Lecture for the course Eng 24: Nikola Tesla - The Genius Who Lit the World, The University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA, Dec 4, 2000 (http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/dept/Courses/E- 24/e24.html) [2] Margaret Cheney, Tesla, Man Out of Time, New J ersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1981 [3] Encyclopedia Americana, Vol 26, Grolier Inc: Connecticut, 1997, Pp. 527-528. [4] Marc J . Seifer, Wizard: The Life and Times of Nikola Tesla: Biography of a Genius, New J ersey: Carol Publishing Group, 1996. [5] J ohn Wagner, personal communication (also see http://www.concentric.net/~J wwagner/ntes-p4.html ) [6] Z. Herskovits, To the Smithsonian or Bust: The Scientific Legacy of Nikola Tesla, Yale Scientific Magazine, Volume 71, Issue 4 (1999) [7] Margaret Cheney and Robert Uth, Tesla: Master of Lightning, Barnes&Noble, 1999. [8] Nikola Tesla, My Inventions, Skolska Knjiga, Zagreb, 1990. [9] Thomas C. Martin, The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla, Barnes&Noble, 1995. [10] A. Marincic, Editor, Nikola Tesla: Colorado Spring Notes 1899- 1900, Nolit, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1978. [11] W. Bernard Carlson, Motors, Myths, and History: An Historian Looks at the Nikola Tesla and the Invention of the AC Motor, Lecture for the course Eng 24: Nikola Tesla - The Genius Who Lit the World, The University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA, Nov 20, 2000. (http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/dept/Courses/E-24/e24.html ) [12] M. Ercegovac, Teslas Visionary Ideas, Lecture for the course Eng 24: Nikola Tesla - The Genius Who Lit the World, The University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA, Sep 16, 2000. (http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/dept/Courses/E-24/e24.html ) [13] N. Tesla , The Transmission of Electric Energy without Wires, Electrical World and Engineer, March 5, 1904. [14] N. Tesla, The Future of the Wireless Art, Wireless Telegraphy and Telephony, 1908, p. 67-71 [15] Greatest Engineering Achievements of the 20th Century, U.S. National Academy of Engineering. (http://www.greatachievements.org/ ), February 2000. [16] The Smithsonian book of invention, Smithsonian Institution ; New York : distributed by W. W. Norton, c1978. [17] Lighting a Revolution, National Museum of History and Technology, Smithsonian Institution, 1979. [18] EEE Power Engineering Society http://swww2.ieee.org/about/awards/sums/tesla.htm [19] J . Vujic, A. Marincic, M. Ercogovac, and B. Milovanovic, Nikola Tesla: 145 Years of Visionary Ideas, Microwave Review, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 2-5, September 2001. [20] V. Popovic, R. Horvat, and N. Nikolic, Editors, Nikola Tesla: Lectures, Patents, Articles, published by Nikola Tesla Museum, Beograd, Yugoslavia, 1956. [21] J .W. Tester, E.M. Drage, M.J . Driscoll, M.W. Golay and W.A. Peters, Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options, The MIT Press, 2005. [22] IPCC (Intrergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). Third Assessment Report. Working Group I: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Geneva: IPCC, 2001. [23] The Path to Sustainable Nuclear Energy: Basic and Applied Research Opportunities for Advanced Fuel Cycles, The US Department of Energy Workshop Report, September 12-14, 2005. [24] A. Paterson, Back to Base-load: The Investments Challenge Outlook on Energy Projects after EPAct 2005 Nuclear, Coal Gasification and New Technology, Bank of America Fixed Income Investors Seminar, December 2005. [25] http://www.insc.anl.gov/pwrmaps/map/world_map.php [26] C. Madic at al., Report CEA-R-6066, 2004. [27] http://www.gnep.energy.gov/