0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
20 просмотров7 страниц
A composite material of a poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK) was developed using mica as a (r)ller. Treatment of mica by PPTA improved the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK as shown by improved mechanical strength. Mica is a plate-like crystalline aluminum which has a high melting point and a low melting point.
A composite material of a poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK) was developed using mica as a (r)ller. Treatment of mica by PPTA improved the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK as shown by improved mechanical strength. Mica is a plate-like crystalline aluminum which has a high melting point and a low melting point.
A composite material of a poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK) was developed using mica as a (r)ller. Treatment of mica by PPTA improved the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK as shown by improved mechanical strength. Mica is a plate-like crystalline aluminum which has a high melting point and a low melting point.
Mechanical properties and frictional behavior of a mica-lled
poly(aryl ether ketone) composite
Daoji Gan * , Shiqiang Lu, Caisheng Song 1 , Zhijian Wang 2 Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Aeronautical Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330034, People's Republic of China Received 28 August 2000; received in revised form 2 January 2001; accepted 22 January 2001 Abstract A composite material of a poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK), which was prepared from diphenyl ether, terephthaloyl and isophthaloyl chloride, was developed using mica as a ller. Poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) (PPTA) was em- ployed for the purpose of improving the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK. Mechanical properties and surface frictional behavior of these materials were examined as a function of mica content used. With increasing content of mica in the materials, the tensile modulus increased and the ultimate elongation decreased while the tensile strength exhibited a maximum value at a particular composition. Treatment of mica by PPTA improved the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK as shown by improved mechanical strength, but did not aect the glass transition behavior of the polymer. Coecient of friction and wearing rate of these materials were aected by the amount of mica used. 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Poly(aryl ether ketone); Mica; Composites; Mechanical properties; Frictional behavior 1. Introduction Poly(aryl ether ketone)s (PAEK) are a type of high- performance polymer which have outstanding thermal, physical and mechanical properties. These polymers and their composite materials have found many applications in aerospace, coating and insulating material elds [14]. Many publications have reported signicant improve- ment of physical, mechanical and frictional properties after PAEK is reinforced by carbon or glass bers [58]. Mica is a plate-like crystalline aluminosilicate and has been widely used as a reinforcing ller in polymeric matrices due to its excellent mechanical, electrical and thermal properties [9]. Commercial usage of mica as a ller can be found in polymer composites involving polyolens, polyesters, polyamides, epoxies and poly- urethanes [9,10]. However, there are few reports on the PAEK composites lled with mica [11]. In this study, PAEK composites lled with mica were prepared. To enhance the interfacial adhesion between mica and PAEK, the mica was treated by a polymer that would provide good adhesion to both mica and PAEK. Tensile tests, dynamic mechanical analysis and sliding friction measurements were used to elucidate the eect of mica content on the mechanical and frictional prop- erties of the materials. 2. Experimental Terephthaloyl chloride (TPC) (99% purity, mp 79 81C) and isophthaloyl chloride (IPC) (99% purity, mp 4344C) were obtained from Nanchang Agrochemical European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 www.elsevier.nl/locate/europolj * Corresponding author. Present address: School of Chem- istry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 770 State Street, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA. Tel.: +1-404-367-8645; fax: +1-404-894-7452. E-mail address: daoji.gan@chemistry.gatech.edu (D. Gan). 1 Present address: Jiangxi Normal University, China. 2 Present address: Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. 0014-3057/01/$ - see front matter 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S0014- 3057( 01) 00010- 6 Factory (Nanchang, China) and used as received. An- hydrous AlCl 3 , diphenyl ether, formic acid and metha- nol were purchased from Jiangxi Chemical Reagents Company (Nanchang, China) and used without puri- cation. 1,2-dichloroethane was distilled with P 2 O 5 before use. N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) was dried using molecular sieves and distilled under reduced pressure. Poly(p-phenylene terephthalamide) (PPTA) was a gift of Guangdong Plastic Inc. (Guangzhou, China). Phlogo- pite-type mica (average diameter >50 lm) was bought from Shanghai Silica Inc. (Shanghai, China). PAEK (Scheme 1) was synthesized by low-tempera- ture FriedelCrafts condensation of diphenyl ether with TPC/IPC (molar ratio of 0.70.3) in the presence of AlCl 3 as a catalyst and 1,2-dichloroethane/DMF as solvents [12,13]. To remove the residual AlCl 3 in the resin, the PAEK was reuxed in formic acid for three days, and extracted with methanol for another two days using a soxhlet apparatus. It has a glass transition temperature (T g ) of 160C, measured using dierential scanning calorimeter (DSC) at a heating rate of 10C/ min. The reduced viscosity (g inh ), measured using a Ubbelohde-type viscometer in 95% H 2 SO 4 at 25C, is 0.95 dL/g. In some cases, the mica was treated by 2% weight concentration of PPTA (g inh = 1:54, T g = 345C) in sulfuric acid and then washed by water to generate a thin layer of PPTA on the mica. PAEK was blended with llers in a Brabender plastic-corder model PLE 330 at 360C. To obtain a nely dispersed composite, a ro- tation speed of 90 rpm was maintained for 12 min. The materials were then compressed at 165C in molds to yield the specimen sheets. To minimize the eect of polymer crystallization on the measurements, both sides of the specimen sheets were placed on a heating stage at 350C for a short time and quenched immediately into ice water. This method resulted in formation of amor- phous glassy samples, as demonstrated by disappearance of the crystallization peak during DSC measurements [14]. The interaction of PPTA with mica was examined by atomic force microscope (AFM) using a nanoscope III scanning probe microscope (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA), equipped with a J-type vertical engage scanner. Mica, treated by PPTA using the same procedure as for preparing composites and annealed at the same temperature, was examined by AFM at dif- ferent stage. Approximate lm thickness was measured by contact AFM using a silicon nitride tip with 0.58 N/m for the spring constant of the cantilever. The measure- ment was performed by applying a large force (~150 nN) to a small area of the surface until no further ma- terials were displaced by the AFM tip. The force was then minimized and a larger square of the AFM image was collected to compare the height of the undisturbed area with that of the machined area. The mica treated by PPTA was also characterized by thermogravimetric an- alyzer (TGA) (PerkinElmer TGS-7), at a heating rate of 20C/min under nitrogen. Tensile testing was carried out using an Instron ma- chine, Model 5583 (Instron Inc., Canton, MA, USA), having a video-monitored optical extensometer. Speci- men sheets with a thickness of ~2 mm were cut into the dumbbell shape specied in Fig. 1, using a steel die. All tests were performed at room temperature with a cross- head rate of 2 mm/min, according to ASTM D-638. Tensile modulus was calculated from the initial slope of the stressstrain curve while both tensile strength and elongation were the values at the breaking point. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) was performed on a Rheometrics, Model RSA II dynamic mechanical tester (Rheometrics Scientic Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA), equipped with low-temperature units using liquid nitrogen as a cooling medium [15]. The specimen lm used for the test had a rectangular dimension of 20 mm in length, 5 mm in width and ~1 mm in thickness. The lms were placed in a sample holder; and 50150 g of pre-tension was added at room temperature to avoid sample buckling. After cooling to 0C, an additional 70 150 g of tension was added and measurements were obtained at 5C increments with 0.1% applied strain at 2 Hz. A MZ 200 friction-and-wear tester (Scientic In- strument Inc., Beijing, China) (Fig. 2) was used to measure the sliding friction and wearing loss. Before experiments, the specimens were abraded by water- abrasive paper. The specimens (rectangular dimension: 30 7 9 mm 3 ) were held by a loading arm, which re- corded the frictional force (F f ). 50, 100 and 200 N of normal loading forces (F n ) were used for the tests. All Scheme 1. Structure of Poly(aryl ether ketone) (PAEK). Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the sample used for tensile test. 1360 D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 the measurements were performed under ambient envi- ronment at a sliding speed of 0.5 m/s. The coecient of friction (f) was calculated as follows: f = F f =F n . The weight of specimen before and after the test was deter- mined by a balance with an accuracy of 10 4 g, and converted into volume using the density of the sample, which was measured by a specic gravity bottle using absolute ethanol as the immersing medium. Wearing rate (W s ) was calculated by: W s = (V 0 V 1 )=(F n L) (mm 3 =(Nm)) where V 0 is the volume of the sample before test, V 1 is the volume after test and L is the sliding distance. For tensile tests and sliding friction measurements, the data shown here are the average values of six replicate tests. 3. Results and discussion It is well known that the physical properties of polymer composites are largely dependent on adhesion between llers and the polymer matrices. Glass bers and solid minerals such as micas have a high surface energy, due to presence of hydroxyl groups on the sur- face. Polar polymers (epoxy resin, nylon, etc.), capable of forming H-bonds with the hydroxyl available on the ller surface, have very strong adhesion to the llers. Other polymers, however, have relatively poor adhesion and wettability to the llers. To improve the ller polymer interaction, interfacial modiers such as cou- pling agents are commonly used. Among these, silane derivatives are the most universal modern coupling agents, and they may improve ller/matrix adhesion, protect the ller surfaces from micro-aws that initiate failure, reinforce the interface layer, improve the ller wetting and dispersion conditions, and increase hydro- phobicity of the surface [16]. Unfortunately, none of silane coupling agents is thermally stable at the high temperature that melt ex- trusion and injection of PAEK requires. PPTA, con- taining both aromatic and amide groups, has high thermal stability and good compatibility with PAEK, and can also form hydrogen bond with the surfaces of minerals [7,17]. The interaction of mica and PPTA was examined by AFM following the procedure for preparing composites. Fig. 3a shows an AFM image of pure mica, where a small area in the center was scratched by applying a large force (~150 nN) by contact AFM with a silicon nitride tip. Since mica is relatively hard and thus cannot be broken by silicon nitride tip, the AFM image of a relatively large area, captured after minimization of force on the cantilever, shows no materials displaced by the AFM tip. Correspondingly, the section analysis does not show much dierence in height between the scrat- ched area and the unscratched area. For the mica treated by PPTA solution and washed by water, the AFM image (Fig. 3b), however, shows a hole made by the AFM tip during the rst stage applying large force in the small area. Considering the hardness of mica, the displaced materials should be PPTA on the mica. This indicated that a layer of PPTA was formed on the mica surface, due to possible H-bonds between the amide groups of PPTA and the hydroxyl groups on mica surface. The PPTA layer has a thickness ~40 nm, as indicated by the section analysis prole through the hole. Fig. 3c shows the AFM image and its section analysis prole after this sample was annealed at 360C for 12 min and washed by water. Again, a hole could be made by the AFM tip and the thickness of PPTA layer was still ~40 nm. It thus can be assumed that the layer of PPTA on mica would be stable for the processing of PAEK/mica composites. Further evidence by TGA shows that ~1.8 wt.% of PPTA was coated on mica as determined by heating the sample to 700C to cause decomposition of the polymer. Tensile properties of PAEK and its composites were measured using an Instron tester at a cross-head rate of 2 mm/min. Typical stressstrain curves are shown in Fig. 4. As expected, PAEK, a plastic polymer, displayed a yielding point in the curve and showed a relatively high value of elongation at break. Both mica/PAEK and treated mica/PAEK composites showed an increased mechanical strength, although the elongation of the materials decreased due to incorporation of rigid mica. The treated mica/PAEK composites exhibited higher values of elongation than the mica/PAEK composites. Fig. 5 shows the tensile properties of PAEK and its composites. Obviously, tensile modulus of these mate- rials increased rapidly with the content of mica, which Fig. 2. Schematic diagram of the friction-and-wear tester. D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 1361 Fig. 3. Contact AFM image (left) and its section analysis prole (right) for (a) pure mica. A small area in the center was scratched by a silicon nitride tip through applying large force (~150 nN) on cantilever. Section prole through the scratched area shows no material displaced by AFM tip due to the high hardness of mica, (b) the mica treated by PPTA and washed by water. A hole was made by AFM tip and the layer of PPTA has a thickness of ~40 nm and (c) the PPTA treated mica after annealing at 360C for 12 min and water washing. A hole with ~40 nm in depth was made by the AFM tip. 1362 D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 was responsible for the high modulus of these compos- ites. Treatment of mica by PPTA before blending did not cause much dierence in the tensile modulus of these composite materials if the same content of mica was used. Tensile strength of these materials initially increased with the content of mica; after reaching a maximum value at ~30 wt.% of mica used, it began to drop. The eect of the ller on the tensile strength may be attrib- uted to the counterbalance of two phenomena as in- creased ller contents in the polymer composites: increased eective surface fracture energy, and increased sizes of voids and agglomeration of ller particles [16,18]. As addition of ller to polymer matrix, dispersed particles make the crack propagation path longer, ab- sorb a portion of the energy and enhance the plastic deformation. Therefore, the surface fracture energy in- creases and the strength of the composites should in- crease with the volume percentage of the ller [16]. However, with increase of ller contents, the size of the voids formed when the polymer matrix becomes de- tached from the ller particles due to deformation will become critically large and may initiate the main crack [16]. In addition, the inevitably increased agglomeration of dispersed ller particles results in decreased mechan- ical strength due to the low strength of the agglomerates themselves [18]. It is also worth mentioning that the composite materials made using mica treated by PPTA generally have higher values of tensile strength in com- parison with those generated using untreated mica. This shows that PPTA improves the interfacial adhesion be- tween PAEK and mica. Ultimate elongation of these materials decreased with increase of the mica content. This is due to development of cracks around the ller particles and possible for- mation of particle agglomerates and voids resulting from local detachment of the matrix from the particles Fig. 4. Typical stressstrain curves of PAEK and its compos- ites. Fig. 5. Tensile properties as a function of mica content in the composite materials. D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 1363 [16]. If the same content of mica is used, the composites containing mica treated by PPTA have relatively higher value of ultimate elongation than those using untreated mica. Again, this can be attributed to the improved in- terfacial adhesion between PAEK and mica by use of PPTA. DMA scans at a constant frequency of 2 Hz are shown in Fig. 6. Storage modulus (G / ) decreased slowly as a function of temperature up to the T g , where a very rapid decrease of G / could be observed. The modulus of these materials, especially at lower temperatures, was aected by the content of mica used. Addition of mica to the polymer matrix leads to an increase of the modulus of the resulting materials, which is in agreement with the results of tensile tests. Although mica treated by PPTA shows relatively good interfacial adhesion to PAEK as observed by the tensile tests, incorporation of mica into these materials has little inuence on the glass transition behavior of PAEK. All the materials have the same T g as the virgin PAEK. This is an indication that the in- teraction between mica and PAEK is not enough to aect the macromolecular mobility of PAEK. Fig. 7 shows the frictional properties as a function of mica used. Compared to materials containing untreated mica, those containing mica treated by PPTA did not lead to regular change in the coecient of friction and wearing rate since the data scattered largely. For the same materials, the coecient of friction and wearing rate generally increased with the loading forces used. With 50 N of loading force used in the test, not much dierence in coecient of friction and wearing rate was found for the composite materials containing dierent ratios of mica. If large loading forces (100 or 200 N) were employed for tests, both coecient of friction and wearing rate decreased with increasing content of mica, reaching a minimum value at 20 wt.% of mica used, and then increasing as a function of mica content. There are several basic established modes, which are commonly used to deal with the tribological behavior [19,20]. For polymer composites, both components, rigid particles and deformable polymers, make contributions to the friction of the resulted materials and are interactive during the frictional process. It has been assumed that the coecient of friction and wearing rate are propor- Fig. 6. DMA temperature scans at a constant frequency of 2 Hz and a heating rate of 5C/min for PAEK and its composites. The mica was treated with PPTA. Fig. 7. Friction properties as a function of mica content in the composite materials measured by using 50, 100 and 200 N of loading forces. 1364 D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 tional to the real contact area, which decreases with increasing modulus of the materials in a given system [20]. In another word, the larger the modulus of the polymer composite, the lower the coecient of friction and wearing rate it exhibits. Therefore, mica is an e- cient component for reducing the coecient of friction and wearing rate of polymer composites, considering the increased modulus of polymer composites as observed by tensile test. However, as the ller fraction increases to a high level, the friction-induced thermal and mechani- cal eects, leading to enhanced softening and plastic deformation of polymer matrix and detachment of the ller from polymer matrix, become dominant and nally lead to increase of frictional coecient and wearing rate of the materials [20]. 4. Summary In summary, both untreated mica and mica treated by PPTA were used as llers in PAEK to prepare composite materials. The treated mica gave stronger interfacial adhesion to the polymer than the untreated mica, but neither caused a change in glass transition behavior of the polymer. The mechanical properties and frictional behavior of these materials were aected by the content of mica used. Based on these observations, the properties of these materials can be tuned, to some extent, by changing the compositions of these materials. References [1] Searle OB, Pfeier RH. Victrex poly(ether sulfone) (PES) and Victrex poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK). Polym Engng Sci 1985;25(8):4746. [2] Cakmak M. Poly(aryl ether ketone)s. Plast Engng (NY) 1997;41:93150. [3] Jar PY, Plummer C. The physical structure and mechanical properties of poly(ether ether ketone). Adv Thermoplast Compos 1993;111140. [4] Nilsson S. A survey of poly-ether-ether-ketone and its advanced composites. NTIS Report 1988, FFA-TN-1988- 37, ETN-89-94545, 55pp; Chem Abstr 1990;112:218231a. [5] Nguyen HX, Ishida H. Poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone) and its advanced composites: a review. Polym Compos 1987;8(2):5773. [6] Seferis JC. Poly(ether ether ketone) (PEEK): processing- structure and properties studies for a matrix in high performance composites. Polym Compos 1986;7(3):158 69. [7] Khan S, Pratte JF, Chang IY, Krueger WH. Composites for aerospace application from Kevlar aramid reinfored PEKK thermoplastic. Int SAMPE Symp Exhib 1990;35:157993. [8] Friedrich K, Karger-Kocsis J, Lu Z. Eects of steel counterface roughness and temperature on the friction and wear of PE(E)K composites under dry sliding condi- tions. Wear 1991;148(2):23547. [9] Miles IS, Rostami S. Multicomponent polymer systems. New York: Wiley; 1992. [10] Fenton M, Hawley G. Properties and economics of mica- reinforced plastics related to processing conditions. Polym Compos 1982;3(4):21829. [11] Hughes OR. Highly lled, moldable poly(aryl ether ketone) composites. Hoechst Celanese Corporation, USA, WO 9641836, 1996. p. 27. [12] Cai MZ, Song CS, Gan DJ, Sheng SR, Zhou LY. Synthesis and characterization of polyether-ketone-ketone/poly- ether-ketone-ether-ketone-ketone random copolymers. Ga- ofenzi Cailiao Kexue Yu Gongcheng 2000;16(1):368. [13] Song C, Cai M, Zhou L. Synthesis of polyaromatic ether ketone ketones by low temperature solution polyconden- sation. Gaofenzi Xuebao 1995;11(1):99103. [14] Qiu Z, Mo Z, Yu Y, Zhang H, Sheng S, Song C. Nonisothermal melt and cold crystallization kinetics of poly(aryl ether ketone ether ketone ketone). J Appl Polym Sci 2000;77(13):286571. [15] Ivanov DA, Legras R, Jonas AM. Interdependencies between the evolution of amorphous and crystalline regions during isothermal cold crystallization of poly (ether-ether-ketone). Macromolecules 1999;32(5):158292. [16] Berlin AA, Volfson SA, Enikolopian NS, Negmatov SS. Principles of polymer composites. Berlin: Springer; 1986. [17] Chen EJH, Hsiao BS. The eect of transcrystalline interphase in advanced polymer composites. Polym Engng Sci 1992;32(4):2806. [18] Nielsen LE. Mechanical properties of polymers and composites, vol. 1. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1974. [19] Rabinowicz E. Friction and wear of materials. New York: Wiley; 1995. [20] Bowden FP, Tabor DT. Friction and lubrication of solid: Part 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1964. D. Gan et al. / European Polymer Journal 37 (2001) 13591365 1365
A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness: A Comparative Study of Mechanical Properties of Zinc Acrylate Epoxy nanocomposites Reinforced by AL2O3 and Cloisite®30B and Their Mixture: Tensile Strength and Fracture Toughness