Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ECONOMI C
OUTLOOK
2 0 1 4 2 0 1 6
May 1, 2014 Detroit Marriott Troy
Oakland Community College M-TEC
SM
Building Auburn Hills, Michigan
i3 Detroit Ferndale, Michigan
2014 Oakland County, Michigan
1 Presentation Review
Hosts and Sponsors of the 29th Annual
Oakland County
Economic Outlook Luncheon
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Hosts
L. Brooks Patterson
Oakland County Executive
John C. Carter
President
Chase, Middle Market Banking
Timothy R. Meyer, Ph.D.
Chancellor
Oakland Community College
Sponsors
Automation Alley
Bishop International Airport
Construction Association of Michigan
ITC Holdings
Kelly Services
Oakland County Workforce Development
Oakland University
Program
11:50 a.m. Welcome
L. Brooks Patterson
Master of Ceremonies
11:55 a.m. Lunch
12:30 p.m. Introduction
L. Brooks Patterson
Introduction of Speakers
John C. Carter
President
Michigan Middle Management Banking
Chase
Timothy R. Meyer, Ph.D.
Chancellor
Oakland Community College
12:40 p.m. George A. Fulton
Donald R. Grimes
Institute for Research on Labor,
Employment, and the Economy
at the University of Michigan
Oakland County Employment
Forecast Through 2016
1:30 p.m. Prize Drawings
Closing Statements
L. Brooks Patterson
2 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Every other Monday youll learn about
our thriving communities, quality
arts & cultural events, active historic
preservation programs or how to take
advantage of our county-wide system
of linked trails and paths. And of course
youll learn about the latest in economic
development in Oakland County.
3 Presentation Review
THE ECONOMIC OUTLOOK FOR OAKLAND COUNTY
IN 20142016
Presentation Review
Prepared by
George A. Fulton
Donald R. Grimes
Institute for Research on Labor, Employment, and the Economy
Prepared for
May 2014
The full report will be provided in J une on the Web (updated each year) at
www.AdvantageOakland.com or www.irlee.umich.edu/clmr
4 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
5 Presentation Review
Average absolute forecast error 19862013: 1.7%
Forecast date: April 2013
Forecast 2013 Actual 2013
Unemployment rate 8.2% 8.1%
Consumer ination rate 1.7% 1.6%
In last years report, we forecast that the Oak-
land County economy would continue its healthy
recovery in 2013, but would back off some from
the red-hot pace it sustained in 2011 and 2012,
which averaged over 26,100 private-sector job
additions per year.
Table 1
Report Card: Track Record over the Years
Year of
Forecast
% Forecast Error
for Total Private J obs
Year of
Forecast
% Forecast Error
for Total Private J obs
Year of
Forecast
% Forecast Error
for Total Private J obs
1986 +1.4 1996 0.5 2006 +3.3
1987 +0.7 1997 +0.6 2007 0
1988 1.8 1998 +1.3 2008 +2.2
1989 1.9 1999 1.2 2009 +5.5
1990 +2.2 2000 +0.6 2010 1.6
1991 +3.9 2001 +1.9 2011 2.3
1992 2.0 2002 +2.5 2012 2.2
1993 +0.5 2003 +1.6 2013 0.8
1994 1.3 2004 +2.6
1995 +0.2 2005 +1.4
(Positive numbers indicate that the forecast was too high; negative numbers indicate that it was too low.)
6 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
NOTES
J ob losses were recorded in every year from 2006
to 2009 in Oakland, with the county economy hit-
ting bottom in the dreadful year of 2009.
Figure 1
J ob Growth in Oakland County, 200613
7 Presentation Review
Figure 1
J ob Growth in Oakland County, 200613
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
18,494
5,801
20,433
59,663
24,865
1,113
24,412
15,734
J ob Growth
2006 2007 2008 2009 2011
*Estimate
2010 2013* 2012
8 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Table 2
Twenty Industries with the Greatest J ob Gains in Oakland County, 201013
It is instructive to break out at a detailed industry
level the top job producers in Oaklands recovery
to date.
NOTES
The top four growth industries are associated with
the auto industry, both its white-collar (engineer-
ing services, headquarters, and testing laborato-
ries) and its manufacturing component.
9 Presentation Review
Table 2
Twenty Industries with the Greatest J ob Gains in Oakland County, 201013
Industry
Change
201013
% Change
201013
Average Wage
2012
Total payroll jobs 65,011 10.6 $54,840
Engineering services 7,219 49.1 71,733
Transportation equipment manufacturing 5,417 38.9 89,429
Management of companies and enterprises 3,573 33.5 130,516
Testing laboratories 3,409 26.1 84,582
Full-service restaurants 3,234 16.1 17,055
Fabricated metals manufacturing 3,191 41.2 58,260
Services to buildings 3,176 38.7 23,761
Merchant wholesalers, durable goods 3,132 15.3 89,371
Business support services 2,230 56.0 42,616
Limited-service restaurants 2,107 14.4 12,836
Construction, specialty trade contractors 1,967 17.6 58,112
Transportation and warehousing 1,920 28.1 47,604
Nursing and residential care facilities 1,919 14.2 26,214
Computer systems design and related services 1,909 10.5 81,025
Machinery manufacturing 1,750 20.1 76,017
Management and technical consulting services 1,686 30.2 77,092
Social assistance 1,667 21.3 22,190
Warehouse clubs and supercenters 1,506 32.3 25,563
Legal services 1,384 13.2 80,549
Wholesale electronic markets, agents, brokers 1,308 28.3 79,244
10 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
The performance of Oaklands economy can also
be evaluated with unemployment as the mea-
sure, including the rate for the United States for
comparison.
NOTES
Figure 2
Unemployment Rates for Oakland County and for the United States, 200913
The decline in the rates observed for 2010 and
2011 was due in part to discouraged workers
leaving the labor force, which ofcially removes
them from the count of the unemployed. By
2012, movements in the local labor force turned
positive, rst minimally and then picking up steam
in 2013, as many more residents sought out ex-
panding job opportunities.
11 Presentation Review
Figure 2
Unemployment Rates for Oakland County and for the United States, 200913
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
9.3
9.6
8.9
8.1
7.4
12.9
12.4
10.2
9.1
8.1
Oakland
United States
12 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Table 3
Oakland County Compared with 35 U.S. Counties of Similar Size
NOTES
We ranked Oakland County and thirty-ve other
counties of similar size in the United States on a
series of measures that we judge to be indicators
of future economic prosperity. The data underly-
ing the rankings are provided in appendix B.
13 Presentation Review
Table 3
Oakland County Compared with 35 U.S. Counties of Similar Size*
(Ranking based on selected indicators of prosperity)
High-Income
Associates Median Persons
Population Degree Child Family Aged 65 Managerial, Sum of Rank
County State 2013 or More Poverty Income or Older Professional Rankings of Sum
Fairfax VA 1,130,924 1 2 1 1 2 7 1
Montgomery MD 1,016,677 2 1 2 2 1 8 2
Middlesex MA 1,552,802 3 5 4 13 3 28 3
Bergen NJ 925,328 8 7 7 6 8 36 4
Faireld CT 939,904 9 8 5 5 12 39 5
Nassau NY 1,352,146 12 4 3 3 18 40 6
Westchester NY 968,802 10 9 6 4 11 40 6
DuPage IL 932,126 7 6 9 11 13 46 8
Wake NC 974,289 4 13 14 12 4 47 9
Hennepin MN 1,198,778 5 16 12 17 6 56 10
Oakland MI 1,231,640 11 10 13 16 7 57 11
Suffolk NY 1,499,738 22 3 8 7 20 60 12
Contra Costa CA 1,094,205 18 11 10 10 14 63 13
Alameda CA 1,578,891 15 15 11 14 9 64 14
Fulton GA 984,293 6 23 16 18 5 68 15
Travis TX 1,120,954 16 25 18 8 10 77 16
St. Louis MO 1,001,444 14 18 17 20 16 85 17
Honolulu HI 983,429 21 12 15 9 30 87 18
Allegheny PA 1,231,527 13 17 19 28 15 92 19
Mecklenburg NC 990,977 17 21 21 19 17 95 20
Salt Lake UT 1,079,721 25 14 22 21 22 104 21
Franklin OH 1,212,263 19 24 23 24 19 109 22
Erie PA 919,866 20 20 20 27 26 113 23
Palm Beach FL 1,372,171 24 22 27 15 29 117 24
Pinellas FL 929,048 28 19 25 30 25 127 25
Sacramento CA 1,462,131 32 27 24 22 24 129 26
Cuyahoga OH 1,263,154 27 26 26 32 21 132 27
Hillsborough FL 1,291,578 26 29 29 29 23 136 28
Pima AZ 996,554 30 30 28 23 28 139 29
Orange FL 1,225,267 23 28 32 26 32 141 30
Shelby TN 939,465 33 32 31 25 31 152 31
Milwaukee WI 956,023 29 31 30 33 33 156 32
Marion IN 928,281 31 33 33 34 34 165 33
Philadelphia PA 1,553,165 34 34 35 35 27 165 33
Fresno CA 955,272 35 35 34 31 35 170 35
Bronx NY 1,418,733 36 36 36 36 36 180 36
*All counties in the United States with a population between 900,000 and 1,600,000 in 2013.
Source: Compiled by Donald Grimes and George Fulton, University of Michigan, using data from the American Community
Survey 2012. Population data are from the Census Bureau population estimates program as of April 2014.
14 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Figure 3
Growth in U.S. GDP, 201216
The best single measure of the U.S. economy is
ination-adjusted, or real, Gross Domestic Prod-
uct (GDP): all of the goods, services, and struc-
tures produced in the economy.
NOTES
In the next three years, steady consumption
growth, solid increases in investment, and a re-
covery in combined government purchases pro-
duce an accelerating economyfrom 2.6 percent
in 2014 to 3.3 percent in 2015 and 3.4 percent in
2016. If proven correct, the projections for 2015
and 2016 would be the rst annual readings of 3
percent or greater since 2005.
2012
2.8
2013
1.9
2014
2.6
2016
0%
1%
2.5%
3.5%
0.5%
1.5%
2.0%
3.0%
2015
3.3
RSQE: March 2014
3.4
In 2013, a sharp deceleration in business invest-
ment early in the year and severe scal auster-
ity at the federal level contributed to signicantly
weaker growth, 1.9 percent for the calendar year.
15 Presentation Review
Figure 4
U.S. Light Vehicle Sales, 19902016
Total sales of U.S. light vehiclescars, minivans,
sport utility vehicles, crossovers, and pickup
truckswere in the range of 16 to 17+million
units sold annually from 1999 to 2007.
NOTES
In the forecast, we reach 16 million units in 2014.
0
5
10
15
20
Millions
'91 '93 '95 '97 '99 '01 '03 '05 '07 '09 '11 '13 '15
RSQE: March 2014
16
'90 '92 '94 '96 '98 '00 '02 '04 '06 '08 '10 '12 '14 '16
16 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
After moving up from 15.5 million units in 2013 to
16 million in 2014, U.S. light vehicle sales rise to
16.3 million in 2015 and increase further to 16.7
million by 2016.
NOTES
This path reects a slower rate of increase over
the next three years compared with the last two.
Detroit Three sales rose by 500,000 units in each
of the years 2012 and 2013, only a little less for
a single year than the cumulative gain of 600,000
units over the next three years combined.
Figure 5
U.S. Light Vehicle Sales, Total vs. Detroit Three, 201216
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Total
2012 2013 2015 2014
Millions
of Units
16.0
15.5
14.4
16.3
16.7
Detroit Three
6.4
6.9
7.1
7.3
7.5
2016
RSQE: March 2014
Annual % Detroit Three
market share
44.8
44.4
44.6
44.2
45.0
17 Presentation Review
Figure 6
J ob Growth in Oakland County, 200616
The Oakland County economy is now entering
its fth year of recovery since the previous reces-
sions low point at the end of 2009. Oakland has
burst out of the recession, adding almost 50,000
jobs in 2011 and 2012 combined, before settling
back to a still-solid gain of 15,734 jobs in 2013.
NOTES
That growth path generates an increase of almost
43,000 jobs over the next three calendar years
a solid gain of 2.1 percent per year.
70,000
60,000
50,000
40,000
30,000
20,000
10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
*Estimate
2006 2007 2008 2009 2011 2010 2012 2013* 2014 2015 2016
18,494
5,801
20,433
59,663
24,412
1,113
24,865
15,734
14,993
10,917
17,027
Oaklands recovery is supported by a U.S. econ-
omy that continues to expand through 2016, as
well as by the countys strong economic funda-
mentals.
NOTES
That would replenish 73.4 percent, or about three
in four, of the jobs lost from the summer of 2000
to the end of 2009. That would also return the
county to the job levels posted in mid-2003, three
years into the nine-year decline.
Figure 7
Total J obs in Oakland County, Seasonally Adjusted,
First Quarter of 2000 to Fourth Quarter of 2016
600,000
650,000
700,000
750,000
800,000
Forecast
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 00 01 15 16
Peak 00q3
*
Trough 09q4
*
13q3
*
16q4
*
Gain:
09q416q4 =122,172
(73.4% of jobs lost)
Loss:
00q309q4 =166,369
J obs
Then the recovery follows: from the low point in
the fourth quarter of 2009 to the end of the pub-
lished data in the third quarter of 2013, Oakland
gained 71,941 jobs.
19 Presentation Review
Table 4
Forecast of Employment in Oakland County by Major Industry Division, 201416*
Average
Annual
Estimate Forecast Employment Change Wage
2013 1314 1415 1516 1316 2012
TOTAL JOBS (Number of persons) 676,153 10,917 14,993 17,027 42,937 $54,840
(Annual percentage change) (2.4) (1.6) (2.2) (2.4)
TOTAL GOVERNMENT 44,762 -293 216 460 384 50,650
TOTAL PRIVATE 631,391 11,210 14,776 16,567 42,553 55,151
GOODS-PRODUCING 80,461 1,414 1,842 1,957 5,213 69,078
Natural resources, mining,
construction
20,860 722 931 979 2,632 61,163
Manufacturing 59,602 692 911 978 2,581 71,802
Fabricated metal products 10,939 313 254 257 824 58,260
Machinery 10,476 111 169 198 478 76,017
Transportation equipment
(motor vehicles)
19,344 220 236 256 712 89,429
Other manufacturing 18,842 48 251 269 567 57,900
PRIVATE SERVICE-PROVIDING 550,929 9,796 12,935 14,610 37,340 53,154
Trade, transportation, and utilities 121,020 1,576 1,737 2,073 5,385 48,916
Wholesale trade 36,504 531 766 885 2,182 83,476
Retail trade 74,512 701 631 827 2,159 30,812
Transportation, warehousing,
and utilities
10,004 344 339 360 1,044 58,510
Information 15,546 -34 131 151 247 72,974
Financial activities 47,919 764 924 1,073 2,761 72,569
Finance and insurance 33,628 594 688 777 2,058 84,200
Real estate and rental and leasing 14,291 171 237 296 703 44,369
Professional and business services 175,133 4,024 6,016 6,376 16,416 67,972
Professional, scientic, and
technical
97,634 3,151 3,819 4,132 11,102 78,098
Management of companies and
enterprises
14,228 549 700 715 1,963 130,516
Administrative support and waste
management
63,271 324 1,498 1,530 3,351 39,480
Private education and health services 108,233 2,043 2,530 3,141 7,714 46,520
Private education services 11,385 393 418 571 1,382 35,203
Health care and social assistance 96,848 1,650 2,112 2,571 6,332 47,779
Leisure and hospitality 60,650 1,190 1,273 1,384 3,847 18,490
Other services 20,696 233 323 413 969 30,906
Unclassied 1,733 0 0 0 0 43,357
*Some subtotals do not add to totals due to rounding of annual average computations.
20 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Table 4
Forecast of Employment in Oakland County by Major Industry Division, 201416
NOTES
The projected job movements in total shown in g-
ure 6 are distributed among twenty-eight major in-
dustry divisions in table 4, and into 235 ner indus-
try divisions in appendix A.
21 Presentation Review
Table 4
Forecast of Employment in Oakland County by Major Industry Division, 201416
NOTES
Retail trade, a much larger and generally lower-
paying sector than wholesale trade, adds 2,159
jobs over the next three years. J ob gains are con-
centrated in motor vehicle and parts dealers (517),
building material and garden supply stores (468),
clothing stores (422), and warehouse clubs and
supercenters (308). Furniture stores, health and
personal care stores, gasoline stations, department
stores, and non-store retailers all lose a relatively
small number of jobs over the forecast period.
NOTES
Four of the top ve industries for job creation are
the same in both periods: engineering services,
testing laboratories, headquarters activity, and
full-service restaurants. Engineering services is
the No. 1 job creator in both periods by a signi-
cant margin.
Table 5
Twenty Industries with the Greatest J ob Gains in Oakland County, 201316
The more advanced stages of the recovery do
usher in some differences as well. Perhaps
most notable, auto manufacturing makes a much
smaller contribution in the forecast period, and its
ranking slips from 2 in the earlier period to 18 in
the later period. Fabricated metals manufactur-
ing retreats from 6 to 16. This is a typical pattern
for manufacturing as a recovery moves into its
more mature stages.
23 Presentation Review
Table 5
Twenty Industries with the Greatest J ob Gains in Oakland County, 201316
Industry
Change
201316
% Change
201316
Average Wage
2012
Total payroll jobs 42,937 6.4 $54,840
Engineering services 4,534 20.7 71,733
Employment services 2,378 7.4 42,190
Testing laboratories 2,293 13.9 84,582
Full-service restaurants 2,047 8.8 17,055
Management of companies and enterprises 1,963 13.8 130,516
Merchant wholesalers, durable goods 1,827 7.7 89,371
Construction, specialty trade contractors 1,761 13.4 58,112
Computer systems design and related services 1,672 8.3 81,025
Nursing and residential care facilities 1,543 10.0 26,214
Hospitals 1,217 3.8 56,981
Credit intermediation and related activities 1,122 7.5 76,762
Social assistance 1,045 11.0 22,190
Transportation and warehousing 1,039 11.9 47,604
Ofces of physicians 896 6.0 76,865
Home health care services 853 9.1 32,554
Fabricated metals manufacturing 824 7.5 58,260
Legal services 796 6.7 80,549
Transportation equipment manufacturing 712 3.7 89,429
Local government, elementary and secondary schools 712 3.4 51,828
Limited-service restaurants 706 4.2 12,836
24 20142016 Economic Outlook for Oakland County
Figure 8
Unemployment Rates for Oakland County and for the United States, 200916
The solid job growth we are projecting for Oakland
County is accompanied by an unemployment rate
that continues to decline over the forecast period,
from 8.1 percent in 2013 to 6.4 percent in 2014,
then falling further to 5.8 percent in 2015 and 5.0
percent in 2016.
NOTES
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
9.3
9.6
8.9
8.1
7.4
12.9
12.4
10.2
9.1
8.1
6.5
6.4
5.9
5.8
5.2
5.0
Oakland
United States
Forecast
The drop of 3.1 percentage points over the three-
year period brings the jobless rate down into the
neighborhood of where it was in 2002, in the ear-
lier stages of the economic decline of the 2000s.
25 Presentation Review
Figure 9
Ination Rate, Detroit CPI, 201216
NOTES
Local ination is measured here by the growth
rate of the Detroit Consumer Price Index (CPI),
representing the Detroit metro area, as consumer
price data are not compiled for the county in iso-
lation.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
1.6
2.0
1.5
1.1
1.8
2013 2015 2014 2016 2012
A domestic labor market where wage gains exert
only modest pressure on prices, along with slug-
gish growth in import prices, restrains ination
throughout the forecast period.