Electronic Parts Reliability Data

EPRD-97
Electronic Parts
Reliability Data 1997
R
A
C
R
A
C
i
Reliability Information Analysis Center
RIAC is a DoD Information Analysis Center sponsored by
the Defense Technical Information Center
Prepared by: William Denson, William Crowell, Paul Jaworski, David Mahar
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
VOLUME I
Section 1: Introduction 1-1
1.1 Background 1-1
1.2 Data Collection 1-3
1.3 Data Interpretation 1-5
1.4 Document Overview 1-8
1.4.1 Section 2 "Part Summaries" Overview 1-9
1.4.2 Section 3 "Part Details" Overview I 1-14
1.4.3 Section 4 "Data Sources" Overview 1-15
1.4.4 Section 5 "Part Number/MIL Number" Index 1-16
1.4.5 Section 6 "National Stock Number Index
with Federal Stock Class" 1-16
1.4.6 Section 7 "National Stock Number Index without
Federal Stock Class Prefix" 1-16
1.4.7 Section 8 "Part Index" Overview 1-16
Section 2: Part Summaries 2-1
Section 3: Part Details 3-1
VOLUME H
Section 3: Part Details (continued) 3-701
Section 4: Data Sources 4-1
Section 5: Part/MIL Number Index 5-1
Section 6: National Stock Number Index With Federal Stock Class 6-1
Section 7: National Stock Number Index Without Federal Stock Class 7-1
Section 8: Part Description Index 8-1
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1-1: Data Summarization Procedure 1-4
Table 1-2: Component Growth Rate Factors 1-8
Table 1-3: Field Descriptions 1-9
Table 1-4: Part Descriptions 1-10
Table 1-5: Application Environments 1-10
Table 1-6: Common Abbreviations 1-15
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1-1: Example of Part Summary Entries 1-13
vn
EPRD-97
|
Introduction 1-1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this document is to provide empirical field failure rate data on electronic components. The
component types for which data is presented in this document are Capacitors, Diodes, Integrated Circuits,
Optoelectronic Devices, Resistors, Thryistors, Transformers, and Transistors.
Reliability data is required to perform reliability assessments of systems. The part types for which data is
contained in this document are those contained in existing reliability prediction methodologies, such as MIL-
HDBK-217. Whereas MIL-HDBK-217 contains mathematical models that have been derived from empirical
field failure rate data, the data contained herein is historically observed field failure rates. This data can be
used as an alternative to existing prediction methodologies.
Commercial quality components are becoming widely used in many applications, including military systems.
Much of the data contained in this document relates to commercial quality components. It can, therefore, be
used to predict reliability for both commercial and military systems containing commercial quality
components.
This document, along with the RAC's document "Nonelectronic Parts Reliability Data" (NPRD-95), contains
all (non-proprietary) component data that is in the RAC databases. These two documents are complementary
and there is no duplication of data between them. Together they provide the capability of estimating the
reliability of most component types used in electronic or mechanical systems.
1.1 Background
Accurate and timely reliability predictions are an important part of a well-structured reliability program. If
properly performed, they can provide insight into the design and maintenance of reliable systems.
A potential use for this document is to complement existing reliability prediction methodologies by providing
failure rate data in a consistent format on various electronic component types. Although the data contained in
this publication was collected from a wide variety of sources, The RAC has screened the data such that only
high quality data is added to the database and presented in this document. In addition, only field failure rate
data has been included.
The user of this document should note that the use of reliability prediction techniques such as MIL-HDBK-
217, or the use of the data contained herein, should complement and not replace sound reliability engineering
and design practices. This document is meant to provide historical reliability data on a wide variety of
components to aid engineers in estimating the reliability of systems. Sound reliability engineering practices
must include a knowledge of the failure physics of all components, modules, and interconnection assemblies in
a system. A knowledge of life-limiting failure mechanisms, and how these mechanisms will behave in the
intended use environment, is also necessary. Only in this manner can robust designs be ensured.
Reliability Analysis Center (RAC) 201 Mill St., Rome, NY 13440-6916 315-337-0900
1-2 Introduction EPRD-97
The intent of this introductory section is to provide the user with the information needed to adequately
interpret and use the data. Since the primary purpose of this document is to augment reliability prediction
methodologies such as MIL-HDBK-217, a brief background of MIL-HDBK-217 will be given, along with a
description of how the data in this document can be used to augment it. The following is an excerpt from the
RAC's April 1990 Newsletter Technical Brief, written by Seymour Morris of Rome Laboratory.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF PERFORMING A RELIABILITY PREDICTION?
Predictions have several purposes, among them are:
(1) feasibility evaluation
(2) comparing competing designs
(3) identification of potential reliability problems
(4) to provide reliability input to other R/M tasks
Feasibility evaluation involves evaluating the compatibility of a proposed design concept with the design reliability
requirements. Early in the system formulation process a feasibility evaluation would typically take the form of a parts
count type prediction (MIL-HDBK-217F, Appendix A) to determine "ballpark" compatibility with required reliability.
Feasibility evaluation may also take the form of a detailed parts stress type analysis (MIL-HDBK-217F, Sections 5-23)
for components used in very high quantities. One example might be for phase shifter modules on a phased array
antenna. Feasibility evaluation is much more critical for totally new design concepts where no similar earlier system
exists than for systems with known reliability performance.
Comparing competing designs is similar to the feasibility evaluation except that it extends through the design process
and provides one input, the predicted reliability, to be used in making broader system level design trade-off decisions
involving factors such as cost, weight, power, performance, etc. A parts stress type prediction is typically refined to
provide a quantitative means of estimating the relative cost-benefit of these and other system level trade-off
considerations.
Predictions which are properly performed provide a methodical means of checking all components for potential
reliability problems. By focusing attention on lower quality, over-stressed or misapplied parts a relative means of
evaluating the reliability impact of these potential problem areas can be performed. It should be emphasized that the
prediction itself does not improve system reliability, it only provides a means for identifying potential problems that, if
corrected, will lead to improved systems reliability. Therefore, predictions provide an excellent vehicle for
government/contractor dialog in reviewing and evaluating the progress of the design prior to testing.
Predictions provide key input to other R/M tasks such as maintainability analysis, testability evaluation and failure
modes and effects analysis (FMEA). Because predictions identify areas of relatively low reliability they provide key
input to weigh the benefits of adding test points, making areas more readily accessible for maintenance or adding
redundancy to reduce the effect of a particularly critical failure mode.
WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF MIL-HDBK-217?
MIL-HDBK-217 is intended to provide a consistent and uniform data base for making reliability predictions when no
substantial reliability experience exists for a particular equipment. It contains two basic methods of calculating
component level failure rates, the "parts stress method" and the "parts count method." The parts count method requires
only limited information such as component type, complexity and part quality to calculate a part failure rate. The parts
count section of the handbook is derived by assigning model factors for more involved part stress method to slightly
conservative estimates of what would typically be expected. All of the specific default values are provided in Appendix
A of the handbook. The parts stress method requires significantly more information such as case or junction
temperature and electrical operating and rated conditions to perform a failure rate calculation. Prior to the development
of the handbook, each contractor would have its own unique set of data of which the source would have to be fully
understood before meaningful design comparisons could be made.
EPRD-97 Introduction 1-3
It is not feasible for documents like MIL-HDBK-217 or other prediction methodologies to contain failure rate
models on every conceivable type of component and assembly
;
Traditionally, reliability prediction models
have been primarily applicable only for generic electronic components. Therefore, this document serves a
variety of needs:
1) To provide failure rate data on commercial quality components.
2) To provide failure rates on state-of-the-art components in cases where data or analyses are not feasible
or required.
3) To complement MIL-HDBK-217 or other prediction methodologies by providing data on part types not
addressed by its models.
1.2 Data Collection
The failure rate data contained in this document represents a cumulative compilation from the early 1970's
through October 1996. However, it should be noted that data is periodically purged from the database in the
event that newer data of higher quality is obtained. The RAC is continuously soliciting new field data in an
effort to keep the databases current. The goals of these data collection efforts are as follows:
1) To obtain data on relatively new part types and assemblies.
2) To collect as much data on as many different data sources, application environments, and quality levels
as possible.
3) To identify as many characteristic details as possible, including both part and application parameters.
The RAC utilized the following generic sources of data for this publication:
Published reports and papers
Data collected from government-sponsored studies
Data collected from military maintenance data collection systems
Data collected from commercial warranty repair systems
Data from commercial/industrial maintenance databases
Data submitted directly to the RAC from military or commercial organizations that maintain
failure databases
Brief descriptions are provided of the sources utilized in this document. Each summarized failure rate can be
mapped to one of these data sources. An example of the process by which the RAC identifies candidate
systems and extracts reliability data on military systems is summarized in Table 1-1.
Table 1-1: Data Summarization Procedure
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Identify System Based On:
Build Parts List:
Obtain Failure Data:
Obtain Operating Data:
Environments/Quality
Age
Component Types
Availability of Quality Data
Obtain Illustrated Parts Breakdown (TPB)
Ensure Correct Version of System
Consistent with Maintenance Data
Identify Characteristics of Components
(Part Numbers, Federal Stock Number, Microfiche, Vendor
Catalogs, etc.)
Enter Part Characteristics into Database
Reliability Improvement Warranty, D056, Warranty
Records
Match Failures to IPB
Insure Part Replacements Were
Component Failures
Add Failure Data to Database
Verify Equipment Inventory
Equipment Hours, Part Hours
Application Environment
Transform Data to Common RAC Database Template
Perhaps the most important aspect of this data collection process is identifying viable sources of high quality
data. Large automated maintenance databases, such as the Air Force MODAS (or REMIS) system or the
Navy's 3M system, typically will not provide accurate data on piece parts. They can, however, provide
acceptable data on assemblies or LRUs, if used judiciously. Additionally, there are specific instances in which
they can be used to obtain piece part data. Piece part data from these maintenance systems is used in the
RAC's data collection efforts only when it can be verified that they accurately report data at this level.
Reliability Improvement Warranty (RTW) data is another high quality data source which has been used by the
RAC. Section 4 of this document contains a brief description of each data source used in this publication
because the RAC believes it is important for the user to understand the types of data that were used in deriving
the failure rates.
The RAC has done everything possible to ensure that only the best data available is published in this
document. Completeness of data, consistency of data, equipment population tracking, failure verification,
availability of parts breakdown structure, and characterization of operational histories are all used to determine
the adequacy of the data. In many cases, data submitted to the RAC is discarded since a reasonable degree of
credibility does not exist.
EPRD-97
Introduction 1-5
Inherent limitations in data collection efforts can result in errors and inaccuracies in summary data. Care must
be taken to ensure that the following factors are considered when using a data source:
There are many more factors affecting reliability than can be identified.
There is a degree of uncertainty in any failure rate data collection effort. This uncertainty is due to
the following factors:
- Uncertainty as to whether the failure was inherent (common cause) or event-related (special
cause).
- Difficulty in separating primary and secondary failures.
- Much data collected is generic and not manufacturer specific, indicating that variations in the
manufacturing process are not accounted for.
It is very difficult to distinguish between the effects of highly correlated variables. For example,
the fact that higher quality components are typically used in the more severe environments makes
it impossible to distinguish the effect each has on reliability.
Operating hours can be reported inaccurately.
Maintenance logs can be incomplete.
Actual component stresses are rarely known. Even if nominal stresses are known, actual stresses
which significantly impact reliability can vary significantly about this nominal value.
When collecting field failure data, a very important variable is the criteria used to detect and classify failures.
Much of the failure data presented in this publication was identified by maintenance technicians performing a
repair action, indicating that the criteria for failure is that a part in a particular application has failed in a
manner that makes it apparent to the technician. In some data sources, the criteria for failure was that the
component replacement must have remedied the failure symptom. A description of these sources is given in
Section 4 of this document.
1.3 Data Interpretation
Data contained in this document reflects industry average failure rates, especially the summary failure rates
which were derived by combining several failure rates on similar parts/assemblies from various sources. In
certain instances, reliability differences can be distinguished between manufacturers or between detailed part
characteristics. Although the summary section cannot be used to identify these differences (since it presents
summaries only by generic type, quality, environment, and data source), the listings in the detailed section
contain all specific information that was known for each part and, therefore, can sometimes be used to identify
such differences.
Data in the summary section of this document represents an "estimate" of the expected failure rate and the
"true" value will lie in some confidence interval about that estimate. The traditional method of identifying
confidence limits for components with exponentially distributed lifetimes has been the use of the Chi-Square
distribution. This distribution relies on the observance of failures from a homogeneous population and,
therefore, has limited applicability to merged data points from a variety of sources.
To give users of this document a better understanding of the confidence they can place in the presented failure
rates, an analysis was performed on the variation in observed failure rates. It was concluded that, for a given
generic part type, the natural logarithm of the observed failure rate is normally distributed with a sigma of 1.5.
This indicates that 68 percent of actual failure rates will be between 0.22 and 4.5 times the mean value.
Similarly, 90% of actual failure rates will be between .08 and 11.9 times the presented value. This type of
precision is typical of probabilistic reliability prediction models and point estimate failure rates such as those
contained herein. It should be noted that this precession is applicable to predicted failure rates at the
component level and that the confidence will increase as the statistical distributions of components are
combined when analyzing modules or systems.
The time period over which the data is collected is also an important attribute when interpreting the data.
Many component types exhibit infant mortality behavior, which is characterized by a decreasing failure rate as
a function of time. This observation is due to the fact that the failure rate of many component types is driven
by defects which occur in a small percentage of the part population. Once these defects have manifested
themselves as failures, the failure rate decreases. Therefore, the failure rate for component types exhibiting
these infant mortality characteristics will appear higher if the data was collected in the early life compared to
being collected later in the component's life.
As a result, data collected from warranty repair records may exhibit failure rates higher than data collected
from maintenance records throughout an equipment's life because warranties are typically only applicable to
the early life. The user of this document is therefore encouraged to review the description of the data sources
in Section 4 to gain a better understanding of specific data points.
It is also necessary to understand its age when interpreting the data contained in this document. The reason for
this is that many electronic part types have experienced reliability growth which has resulted from the
reliability improvement efforts of the component manufacturers. Some components, such as integrated
circuits, have experienced a large degree of growth, while others, such as resistors, have experienced a slower
growth rate.
An analysis of the data has been performed to quantify the rate of reliability growth as a function of the year of
component manufacture. A model of the following form was used to quantify the growth rate:
where,
X = Failure rate (F/10
6
hrs)
A = Constant
B = Growth rate
t = Time in years
Table 1-2 summarizes the values of B derived for various component types. As an example of how this
growth effect can be interpreted, consider a plastic encapsulated microprocessor microcircuit whose B value is
.526. In this example, the failure rate for these devices has improved between 1990 and 1995 by an average
factor of:
e
-.526( 1995-1990) _ Q^
It is suggested that the user of this data review the data source descriptions in Section 4 of this document to
determine the age of specific data when it appears in the data source descriptions. The dates provided are
indicative of the dates over which the data was collected, not the date of part manufacture. This data is
provided so that the user of this data can quantify a "typical" reliability improvement from the time at which
the data was collected to the present. While this data can be used to calculate an improvement factor and
modify the failure rates presented herein accordingly, the user is cautioned that this procedure will add a
degree of uncertainty in the resultant failure rate estimate. This is due to the assumption that the growth rate
continues at a (logrithmically) constant rate in accordance with the above equation. Therefore, extrapolation of
the failure rate increases the level of uncertainty, and the uncertainty increases with the extrapolation distance.
It should be stressed that the data in this document should not be used to form general conclusions or to guide
policy decisions. For example, data for a particular device in the summary section may indicate that a lower
quality level part is more reliable than a high quality part. This situation could occur when a higher quality
part is overstressed or otherwise misapplied in the design. It cannot be concluded that quality has an inverse
effect on reliability. In this situation, the data collected was either not adequate to accurately identify the
difference or there were too many uncontrolled and unidentified variables inherent in the data.
Table 1-2: Component Growth Rate Factors
Part Type
Electrolytic Capacitors
Non-Electrolyuc Capacitors
Resistors
Rectifier Diodes
Zener Diodes
Other Diodes
Bipolar Transistors
FET Transistors
Darlington Transistors
Bipolar Digital Microcircuits
(Plastic Encapsulated)
Bipolar Linear Microcircuits
MOS Digital Microcircuits
MOS Digital Microprocessors
B
0.229
0.00824
0.00
0.297
0.150
0.223
0.281
0.397
0.269
0.552
0.197
0.475
0.526
In virtually all field failure data collected by the RAC, time to failure was not available. Few DoD or
commercial data tracking systems report elapsed time indicator (ETI) readings to allow time-to-failure
computations. Those that do report ETI readings loose accuracy following removal and replacement of failed
items. To accurately monitor these times, each replaceable item would require its own individual time
recording device. The RAC's data collection efforts typically track only the total number of item failures, part
populations, and the number of system operating hours. This means that the assumed underlying time-to-
failure distribution for all failure rates presented in this document is the exponential.
1.4 Document Overview
This document has been organized into the following sections:
Section 1: Introduction
Section 2: Part Summaries
Section 3: Part Details
Section 4: Data Sources
Section 5: Part Number/Mil Number Index
Section 6: National Stock Number Index with Federal Stock Class Prefix
Section 7: National Stock Number Index without Federal Stock Class Prefix
Section 8: Part Description Index
Sections 2 through 8 are described in detail in the following pages.
EPRD-97
Introduction 1-9
1.4.1 Section 2 "Part Summaries" Overview
The summary section of this document contains combined failure rate data in order of Part Description,
Quality Level, Application Environment, and Data Source. The Part Description itself is presented in a
hierarchical classification. The known technical characteristics, in addition to the classification, are contained
in Section 3, "Part Details". All data records were combined by totaling the failures and operating hours from
each unique data source. In some cases, only failure rates were reported to the RAC. These data points do not
include specific operating hours and failures, and have dashes in the Total Failed and Operating Hours/Miles
fields. Table 1-3 describes each field presented in the summary section.
Table 1-3: Field Descriptions
Field
i
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Field Name
Part Description
Quality Level
App .Env.
Data Source
Fail. Rate
Fails/(E6)
Total Failed
Op. Hours/
Miles (E6)
Detail Page
Field Description
Description of part including the major family of parts and specific part type breakdown within the
part family. The Part Description used in this document is presented in levels of classification. The
first level is used to describe the generic function/description of the part and the remaining levels are
used as more detailed descriptions of the part Table 1-4 summarizes the descriptions for each level
associated with each component type.
In some cases, only generic part descriptions were supplied to the RAC. For these, detailed part
descriptions are not known.
The Quality Level of the part as indicated by:
Commercial - Commercial quality parts
Military - Parts procured in accordance with MIL specifications
Unknown - Data resulting from a device of unknown quality level
The Application Environment describes the conditions of field operation. See Table 1*5 for a
detailed list of application environments and descriptions. These environments are consistent with
MIL-HDBK-217. In some cases, environments more generic than those used in MIL-HDBK-217 are
used. For example: "A" indicates the part was used in an Airborne environment, but the precise
location and aircraft type was not known. Additionally, some are more specific than the current
version of MIL-HDBK-217 since the current version has merged many of the environments and the
data was originally categorized into the more specific environment Environments preceded by the
term "NO" are indicative of components used in a non-operating system in the specified
environment
Source of data comprising this entry. The source number may be used as a reference to Section 4 to
review individual data source descriptions.
The failure rate presented for each part type, environment quality, and source. It is the total number
of failures divided by the total number of life units. No letter suffix indicates the failure rate is in
failures per million hours. An "M" suffix indicates the unit is failures per million miles. For roll-up
data entries (i.e., those without sources listed), the failure rate is derived using the data merge
algorithm described in this section. A failure rate preceded by a "<" is representative of entries with
no failures. The failure rate listed was calculated by using a single failure divided by the given
number of operating hours. The resulting number is a worst case failure rate and the real failure rate
is less than this value. All failure rates are presented in a fixed format of four decimal places after
the decimal point The user is cautioned that the presented data has inherently high variability and
that four decimal places does not imply any level of precision or accuracy.
The total number of failures observed in the merged data records.
The total number of operating life units (in millions) observed in merged data records. Absence of a
suffix indicates hours is the life unit and "M" indicates that miles is the life unit
The page number containing the detail data which comprises the summary record.
Component Type
Capacitor
Diode
Integrated Circuit *
Optoelectronic Device
Resistor
Thyristor
Transformer
Transistor
Table 1-4: Part Descriptions
Device Type Descriptors
Fixed or Variable, Dielectric Type, Further Description
Function or Type, Further Description
Package Material, Function, Process Technology
Device Type, Further Description
Fixed, Variable, or Network, Resistive Material, Further Description
SCR or Triac, Further Description
Further Description
Type or Technology, Further Description
* Note: For IC's, the second level is always the Package Material and the last level is always the Technology Type. The term "Unknown" in either of these fields
indicates insufficient data to accurately describe the field.
Table 1-5: Application Environments
Env
Description
A
AI
AIA
Am
AIC
AIF
AIT
ARW
AU
AUA
AUB
AUF
AUT
DOR
G
GB&
GBC
GF
GM
ML
MP
N
NH
NS
NSB
NU
N/R
SF
Airborne - The most generalized aircraft operation and testing conditions.
Airborne Inhabited - General conditions in inhabited areas without environmental extremes.
Airborne Inhabited Attack - Typical conditions in cargo compartments occupied by aircrew without environment extremes of pressure, temperature, shock and vibration
and installed on high performance aircraft such as used for ground support.
Airborne Inhabited Bomber -Typical conditions in bomber compartments occupied by aircrew without environment extremes of pressure, temperature, shock and
vibration and installed on long mission bomber aircraft
Airborne Inhabited Cargo - Typical conditions in cargo compartments occupied by aircrew without environment extremes of pressure, temperature, shock and vibration
and installed on long mission transport aircraft.
Airborne Inhabited Fighter - Typical conditions in cargo compartments occupied by aircrew without environment extremes of pressure, temperature, shock and vibration
and installed on high performance aircraft such as fighters and interceptors.
Airborne Inhabited Transport - Typical conditions in cargo compartments occupied by aircrew without environment extremes of pressure, temperature, shock and
vibration and installed on high performance aircraft such as trainer aircraft.
Airborne Rotary Wing - Equipment installed on helicopters; includes laser designators and fire control systems.
Airborne Uninhabited - General conditions of such areas as cargo storage areas, wing and tail installations where extreme pressure, temperature, and vibration cycling
exist.
Airborne Uninhabited Attack - Bomb bay, equipment bay, tail, or where extreme pressure, vibration, and temperature cycling may be aggravated by contamination from
oil, hydraulic fluid and engine exhaust. Installed on high performance aircraft such as used for ground support
Airborne Uninhabited Bomber - Bomb bay, equipment bay, tail, or where extreme pressure, vibration, and temperature cycling may be aggravated by contamination from
oil, hydraulic fluid and engine exhaust Installed on long mission bomber aircraft
Airborne Uninhabited fighter - Bomb bay, equipment bay, tail, or where extreme pressure, vibration, and temperature cycling may be aggravated by contamination from
oil, hydraulic fluid and engine exhaust Installed on high performance aircraft such as fighters and interceptors.
Airborne Uninhabited Transport - Bomb bay, equipment bay, tail, or where extreme pressure, vibration, and temperature cycling may be aggravated by contamination
from oil, hydraulic fluid and engine exhaust Installed on high performance aircraft such as used for trainer aircraft
Dormant - Component or equipment is connected to a system in the normal operational configuration and experiences non-operational and/or periodic operational
stresses and environmental stresses. The system may be in a dormant state for prolonged periods before being used in a mission.
Ground - The most generalized ground operation and test conditions.
Ground Benign Non-mobile, laboratory environment readily accessible to maintenance; includes laboratory instruments and test equipment medical electronic
equipment business and scientific computer complexes. GBC refers to a commercial application of a commercial part
Ground Fixed - Conditions less than ideal such as installation in permanent racks with adequate cooling air and possible installation in unhealed buildings; includes
permanent installation of air traffic control, radar and communications facilities.
Ground Mobile - Equipment installed on wheeled or tracked vehicles; includes tactical missile ground support equipment mobile communication equipment tactical fire
direction systems.
Missile Launch - Severe conditions related to missile launch (air and ground), and space vehicle boost into orbit vehicle re-entry and landing by parachute. Conditions
may also apply to rocket propulsion powered flight
Manpack - Portable electronic equipment being manually transported while in operation; includes portable field communications equipment and laser designations and
rangefinders.
Naval - The most generalized normal fleet operation aboard a surface vessel.
Naval Hydrofoil - Equipment installed in a hydrofoil vessel.
Naval Sheltered - Sheltered or below deck conditions, protected from weather, include surface ships communication, computer, and sonar equipment
Naval Submarine - Equipment installed in submarines; includes navigation and launch control systems.
Naval Unsheltered - Nonprotected surface shipbome equipment exposed to weather conditions; includes most mounted equipment and missile/projectile fire control
equipment
Not Reported - Data source did not report application environment.
Spaceflight - Earth orbital. Approaches benign ground conditions. Vehicle neither under powered flight nor in atmosphere re-entry, includes satellites and shuttles.
EPRD-97
Introduction 1-11
Data records are also merged and presented at each level of part description (from most generic to most
specific). The data entries with no source listed represent these merged records. Merging data becomes a
particular problem due to the wide dispersion in failure rates, and because many data points consist of only
survival data in which no failures occurred, thus making it impossible to derive a failure rate. Several
approaches were considered in defining an optimum data merge routine. These options are summarized as
follows:
1) Summing all failures and dividing by the sum of all hours. The advantages of this methodology are
its simplicity and the fact that all observed operating hours are accounted for. The primary
disadvantage is that it does not weigh outlier data points less than those clustering about a mean
value. This can cause a single failure rate to dominate the resulting value.
2) Using statistical methods to identify and exclude outliers prior to summing hours and failures. This
methodology would be very advantageous in the event there are enough failure rate data points to
properly apply the statistical methods. The data being combined in this document often consists of a
very few number of data points, thus negating the validity of such methods.
3) Deriving the arithmetic mean of all observed failure rates which are from data records with failures
and modifying this value in accordance with the percentage of operating hours associated with zero
failure records. Advantages of this method are that modifying the mean in accordance with the
percentage of operating hours from survival data will ensure that all observed part hours are
accounted for, regardless of whether they have experienced failures. Disadvantages are that the
arithmetic mean does not apply less weight to those data points substantially beyond the mean and,
therefore, a single data point could dominate the calculated failure rate.
4) Using a mean failure rate by taking the lower 60% confidence level (Chi-Square) for zero failure data
records and combining these with failure rates from failure records. The disadvantages of this
methodology are that the 60% lower confidence limit can be a pessimistic approximation of the
failure rate, especially in the case where there are few observed part hours of operation. An
arithmetic mean failure rate of these values combined with the failure rates from failure records could
yield a failure rate which is dominated by a single failure rate, which itself may be based on a zero
failure data point. The use of a geometric mean would alleviate some of this effect, however, the
problem with the pessimistic nature of using the confidence level will remain.
5) Deriving the geometric mean of all the failure rates associated with records having failures and
multiplying the derived failure rates by the proportion: [observed hours with failures/total observed
hours]. For example, if 70 percent of the total part hours correspond to records with failures, the
geometric mean of failure rates from the data records with failures would be multiplied by 0.7. This
option is appealing, since the geometric mean will inherently apply less weight to failure rates that
are significantly greater than the others for the same part type. The merged failure rate should be
representative of the population of parts since it takes into consideration all observed operating hours,
regardless of whether or not there were observed failures.
Reliability Analysis Center (RAC) 201 Mill St., Rome, NY 13440-6916 . 315-337-0900
Option 5 was selected since it is the only one that (1) accounts for all operating hours and (2) applied less
weighting to the outliers. The resulting algorithm used to merge data is:
^merged =
U = l )
i
n'

( n' >
I"
i =l
n
I"
k i=l )
where,
\["k\ = The product of failure rates from Section 2 records with failures*
i = l
V h' = The sum of hours from Section 2 records with failures'
1
i=l
I"
i=l
n
n*
h
h'
= The sum of hours from Section 2 records
The total number of Section 2 data records
The total number of Section 2 data records with failures*
The number of hours associated with all Section 2 data records
The number of hours associated with all Section 2 data records with failures*
* Note: Or having a second source failure rate.
Data entries with "(Summary)" following the part description are comprised of a merge of all data related to
the generic part type listed. As an example, consider the entry for "Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic (Summary)"
in Figure 1-1. The bottom entry of 0.0957 represents a roll-up of all failure rate data sources for electrolytic
capacitors in a Ground Fixed (G
F
) application environment. The failure rate of 0.3410 (entry opposite the
Military Quality Level) represents the roll-up of all data sources and all environments for military quality
capacitors. The failure rate of 0.1745 (entry opposite the "Summary" heading) represents the rolled-up failure
rate for all electrolytic capacitors for all quality levels, environments and data sources. In this example, the
summary data represents a roll-up of all data contained following having part descriptions beginning with
"Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic".
Data entries associated with part descriptions are displayed in three levels, Summarized, Roll-Up, and
Summary. Summarized entries represent the actual data from each data source and are identified by having an
entry in the Data Source column for the line of data. These records are a combination of the detailed records in
Section 3. Roll-Up entries represent roll-ups of Summarized entries at the Quality and/or Application
Environment levels. Roll-Up entries are identified by having no entry in the Data Source column for the line of
data. Summary entries are roll-ups of an entire higher level Part Descriptor and are identified by having the
term "(Summary)" immediately following the Part Description.
Part
Description
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic (Summary)
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic, Al
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic, Ta
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic, Ta Foil
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic, Ta Solid
Quality
Level
Commercial
Military
Military
Commercial
Military
Commercial
Military
Military
Military
App.
Env.
GBC
AIA
AIC
AU
AUA
AUF
G
GF
AIA
AIC
AU
AUA
AUF
GF
GBC
AU
AUA
AUF
GF
GBC
GF
G
AIA
AIC
GF
Data
Sour ce
23035-000
17189-000
13655-000
23035-000
23035-000
14851-000
13567-021
13655-000
23035-000
23035-000
14851-000
23039-000
13567-021
14851-000
23040-000
23035-000
17189-000
14851-000
Fail. Rate
Fails/(E6)
0.1745
0.0070
0.3410
< 0.1669
0.1847
0.2149
2.3770
5.3966
0.7143
0.0957
1.1228
1.1228
< 0.1728
< 0.3166
0.2200
2.4194
5.4930
0.5899
0.0455
0.0099
0.0859
< 0.1091
< 4.8388
< 8.5447
0.0976
0.2082
0.0458
0.0094
0.0049
0.0189
0.7143
0.7143
0.0655
0.0655
< 4.8388
0.4433
< 0.0781
Total
Failed
0
0
85
28
36
17
236
0
0
0
10
1
224
3
5
0
1
0
Op. Hours/
Miles (E6)
5.7865
3.1584
386.3482
11.5731
6.5538
28.8183
23852.2128
9.1624
0.2067
0.1170
48.0305
21.8542
45341.4884
166.5056
7.0000
2.2067
2.2560
12.8081
Figure 1-1: Example of Part Summary Entries
As an example, consider the Military failure rate entry of 1.1228 under "Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic". As
previously stated, this represents a roll-up of six individual data entries, of which four have failures. These six
represent all the combinations of environments and data sources for the available data. The previously
described algorithm was used, and is illustrated as follows:
/.merged (.2200 2.4194 5.4930.5899) " .
386.3482
5.7865 + 3.1584 + 386
+ 11.5731+ 6.5538+ 28.8183 "1
586.3482 +11.5731 + 6.5538 + 28.8183 J
= 1.1228CF/106)
In this particular case, the roll-up for "Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic" is also 1.1228 because there was no data
for commercial quality parts.
In the previous example, the summary entry is distinguished from the non-summary entry because the
summary entry represents a roll-up of all electrolytic capacitors and the non-summary entry represents
electrolytic capacitors for which the specific type was unknown.
Roll-ups are performed at every combination of part description, quality level, and application environment.
The data points being merged in the summary section include only those records for which a data source is
listed. These individual data points were already combined by summing part hours and failures (associated
with the detailed records) for each unique data source. Roll-ups performed on only zero failure data records
are accomplished by summing the total operating hours, calculating a failure rate by assuming one failure, and
denoting the resulting worst case failure rate with a "<" sign.
The roll-ups were performed in this manner to give the user maximum flexibility in choosing data on the most
specific part type possible. For example, if the user needs data on a part type which is not specified in detail,
or for conditions for which data does not exist in this document, the user can choose data on a more generic
part type or summary condition for which there is data.
1.4.2 Section 3 "Part Details" Overview
The detailed part data in Section 3 can be used to:
Determine if there is data on a specific part number, manufacturer or device with similar physical
characteristics to the one of interest.
View the detailed data that was used to generate the summarized data section, so that a qualitative
assessment of the data can be made.
The user is cautioned that individual data points from the detailed section may be of limited value relative to
the merged summary data in Section 2, which combines records from several sources and typically results in
many more part hours. In no case should the detailed data or summary data be used to pick the most desirable
failure rate for a particular part or assembly.
Section 3 contains a listing of all field experience records contained in the RAC electronic part databases. The
detailed data section presents individual data records representative of specific part types used in a particular
application from a single data source. For example, if 20 relays of the same type were used in a specific
military system, for which there were 300 systems in service, each with 1300 hours of operation over the time
in which the data was collected, the part population is 20 x 300 = 6000, and the total part operating hours are:
6000 x 1300 = 7,800,000 hours. If the same part is used in another system, or the system is used in different
EPRD-97
Introduction 1-15
operating environments, or if the information came from a different source, separate data records are
generated. If known, the population size is given for each data record.
To reduce the size of descriptions used in the detailed section, terms were often abbreviated. Common
abbreviations used are given in Table 1-6.
Table 1-6: Common Abbreviations
Abbr.
#
Char
COM
Cur
De
R
Elm
End
Freq
Ham
Imp
Imped
Ja
Jc
June
Mat
Mfr
n
NSN
Op
P
P#
PkR
Pop
Pos
Pwr
Oty
Res
Semi
Term
Tol
u
UP#
V
w
Description
Number of
Character
Contact
Current
Degrees
Element
Enclosure
Frequency
Hermetic
Hermetici ty
Impedance
Junction to Ambient
Junction to Case
Junction
Material
Manufacturer
nano
National Stock Number
Operational -
pico
Part Number
Package
Population
Positive
Power
Quantity
Resistance
Semiconductor
Terminal
Tolerance
micro
User Part Number
Volt
Watt
1.4.3 Section 4 "Data Sources" Overview
This section describes each of the data sources from which data was extracted for this publication. Title,
author(s), publication dates, report numbers, and a brief abstract are presented. In a number of cases,
information regarding the source had to be kept proprietary. In these cases, "Source Proprietary" is stated.
)
1.4.4 Section 5 "Part Number/MIL Number" Index
This section provides an index, ordered by generic part type, of those Section 3 data entries that contain a part
number or MIL-Spec number. The Section 3 page number which contains the specific entry for the part or
MIL number of interest is given. Note that not all data entries contain a part or MIL number since these
numbers are not applicable or were not known for all entries.
1.4.5 Section 6 "National Stock Number Index with Federal Stock Class"
This section provides an index of those Section 3 data entries that contain a National Stock Number (NSN),
including the four digit Federal Stock Class (FSC) prefix. This index contains all parts for which the NSN
was known.
1.4.6 Section 7 "National Stock Number Index without Federal Stock Class Prefix"
This section provides an index similar to the Section 6 index, with the exception that the first four digit FSC is
omitted.
1.4.7 Section 8 "Part Description Index"
The Part Description Index provides a comprehensive cross-reference to both the Summary (Section 2) and
Detail (Section 3) data sections. Each part category has been indexed on all pertinent words contained in the
part description. The Section 2 and Section 3 page numbers which contain the specific entry of interest are
listed.
Reliability Analysis Center (RAC) . 201 Mill St., Rome, NY 13440-6916 315-337-0900
EPRD-97 Part Summaries 2-1
Part
Description
Quality
Level
App. Data
Env. source
Fail. Rate Total op. Hours/ Detail
Fails/(E6) Failed Miles (E6) Page
Capacitor,Fixed (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed
Capacitor,Fixed,Carbon
Capacitor,Fixed,Ceramic (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,ceramic
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
GB
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
GM
23048-002
23048-004
N/R
23048-001
23048-003
AIA 23035-000
A1C 17189-000
AU 13655-000
AUA 23035-000
AUF 23035-000
DOR 11233-000
G 23040-000
GP 23039-000
GB
13567-022
13567-023
27027-000
GM 27030-000
NOAIF 24550-000
NOGF 24550-000
GB
13567-021
13567-022
NOGF
AIA
AIC
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
G
GP
NOAIP
NOGP
GB
NOAIP
NOGP
NOGF 24550-000
AIA 23035-000
AIC 17189-000
AU 13655-000
AUA 23035-000
AUF 23035-000
DOR 11233-000
GP
14851-000
23039-000
NOAIP 24550-000
NOGF 24550-000
GB
13567-022
13567-023
27027-000
NOAIF 24550-000
NOGP 24550-000
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.0267
0.0077M
0.0072
0.0093M
0.0010
0.0029M
0.0010
0.0011
0.0000
0.0003
0.0040M
0.0090M
0.0018M
0.0021M
0.0049M
0.0009M
0.0047
0.3024
0.5215
0.3274
4.8388
8.5447
0.0009
0.1250
0.0232
0.1550
0.9612M
0.1550
0.0090
0.2363
0.1550
0.9612M
0.0193
0.0095
0.0209
0.0222
0.3387
0.0212
0.0003
0.0175
0.0077
0.0638
0.0505
0.1290
2.0507
0.0011
0.0049
0.0230
0.0031
0.0013
0.0162
0.5176
0.0308
0.0014
0.0180
0.0003
0.0232
0.0077
0.0638
0.0505
0.1290
2.0507
0.0011
0.0230
0.0188
0.0280
0.0031
0.0013
0.0042
0.0908
0.1242
2.0243
0.0908
0.0308
0.0014
340
0
0
-
-
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
6
0
0
-
30
0
0
0
0
4
0
7
46
2
18
5
13
2
12
9
0
0
-
2
0
304542.1080
22898.6667
3629.3439
3.3066
1.9176
3.0541
0.2067
0.1170
14864.2750
8.0000
258.2772
111.2241
4.2315
31.2102M
51.9010
104.8430
44.9956
2.9523
14916.7440
129.3704
109.6416
910.132S
15.4997
8.7774
4382.4270
690.0375
71.5229
3846.1160
6891.1070
8.0483
0.4940
64.8750
734.7800
3-1
3-28
3-49
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-56
3-58
3-58
3-58
3-58
3-58
3-58
3-58
3-59
3-59
3-61
3-64
3-65
3-66
3-67
3-67
3-68
3-68
3-68
3-69
3-69
3-69
3-69
3-69
2-2 Part Summaries EPRD-97
Part
Description
Quality App. Data Fail. Rate Total Op. Hours/ Detail
Level Env. source Fails/(E6) Failed Miles (E6) Page
Capacitor,Fixed,Ceramic,Disc
Capacitor,Fixed,ceramic,Feed-Thru
Capacitor,Fixed,Ceramic,Multilayer Chip
Military
Military .
Unknown
Military
G 23040-000
<
DOR 11233-000 <
GB 27027-000
0.0100
2.9500
0.0866
2.9500
0.0024
3
0
-
300.0000
11.5510
3-69
3-69
3-69
DOR 11233-000 < 0.0546
G 23040-000 0.0024
0 18.3010 3-69
24 10000.0000 3-69
Capacitor,Fixed,Chip
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic (Summary)
GB 13567-023 < 13.9860 0.0715 3-69
Commercial
Military
GB
GM
N/R
NOGF
AIA
A1C
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
G
GF
NOAIF
NOGP
GB
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic
Commercial
NOGF
Military
Unknown
Capacitor, Fixed, Electrolytic, Aluminum
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum (Summary)
23048-
23048-
23048-
23048-
24550-
AIA 2303S-
AIC 17189-
AU 13655-
AUA 23035-
AUF 23035-
GF 14851-
NOA1P 24550-
NOGF 24550-
GB 27027-
002
004
001
003
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
000
commercial
Military
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
AU 13655-000
AUA 23035-000
AUF 23035-000
DOR 11233-000
G 23040-000
GF
14851-000
23039-000
GB
13567-022
13567-023
27027-000
Commercial
Military
GB
GM
N/R
AIA
A1C
DOR
G
GF
0.0360
0.0031M
0.0033
0.0031M
0.0065
0.0020M
0.0047M
0.0009
0.0396
.1669
.1847
.2149
.3770
.3966
.0017
0.0243
0.0957
0.0020
0.0022
0.1377
0.0625
0.0020M
0.0009
0.0020M
0.0021M
0.0053M
0.0009M
0.0020M
0.0039M
0.0010M
0.0009
0.1401
0.1728
0.3166
0.2200
2.4194
S.4930
0.5899
0.0020
0.0022
0.0350
.0411
.0094
.0099
.0009
.0067
.0482
0.1091
4.8388
8.5447
0.1645
.0124
.0976
.2082
.0458
.1350
.0049
.1960
.1350
0.0232
0.0046M
0.0045
0.0046M
0.0045
.0019M
.0113M
.0123
.8388
.4433
.0017
.0341
30379.0890M 3-69
3-70
14708.6580M 3-70
3-71
10282.0910 3-71
0
0
85
28
36
17
2
18
236
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
5.7865
3.1584
386.3482
11.5731
6.5538
28.8183
1012.0600
8073.1150
3-72
3-72
3-72
3-73
3-74
3-75
3-76
3-76
3-76
23852.2128 3-76
1168.7741 3-96
150.1110 3-110
9.1624 3-113
0.2067 3-113
0.1170 3-113
6.0800 3-113
SOS.0160 3-113
10 48.0305 3-113
1 21.8542 3-113
0
0
-
202.1864
5.1012
3-113
3-115
3-115
0.0167
Part
Description
Quality
Level
App. Data
Env. Source
Fail. Rate Total Op. Hours/ Detail
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum (continued)
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum,Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum,Solid
Capacitor,Fixed,Electrolytic,Tantalum,Wet Slug
Capacitor,Fixed,Glass
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Military
Unknown
Military
Unknown
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
GB
GM
N/R
DOR
GP
GB
DOR
G
GB
M A
AIC
DOR
G
GF
GB
DOR
G
GB
GB
NOGF
AIA
AIC
DOR
G
NOGF
GB
NOAIP
GB
NOGF
AIA
AIC
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
G
GF
NOGF
GB
GB
<
<
13567-021
13567-022 <
13567-023 <
<
23048-002 <
23048-004
<
23048-001 <
23048-003
11233-000
14851-000
<
13567-022 <
13567-023 <
27027-000
11233-000 <
23040-000
27027-000
23035-000 <
17189-000
11233-000
23040-000
14851-000 <
27027-000
11233-000
23040-000 <
*
13567-022
13567-023 <
<
<
<
13567-021 <
13567-022 <
13567-023 <
24550-000 <
<
23035-000 <
17189-000 <
11233-000 <
23040-000 <
24550-000 <
<
<
13567-022 <
27027-000
24550-000 <
<
<
<
<
13567-021
13567-022 <
13567-023 <
0.0130
0.0046M
0.0045
0.0046M
0.0045
0.0049
0.0003
0.0017
0.0019M
0.0058M
0.0006M
0.0113M
0.0079M
0.0161M
0.0037
0.0008
0.0180
0.6000
0.0026
0.0159
0.6000
0.0121
0.0314
0.0066
0.7143
0.1057
0.0156
0.0071
4.8388
0.4433
0.0005
0.0017
0.0781
0.1650
0.0126
0.0127
0.0139
0.0250
0.2443
0.2485
14.2450
0.0600
0.0022
0.0124
0.0128
0.5723
4.0064
0.0027
0.0007
0.1383
0.2396
0.0033
25.0000
0.0009
0.0600
0.0600
0.0928
0.0600
0.0385
0.0266
0.0010
0.0019
0.0006
0.0506
4.8388
8.8652
1.5776
0.8343
2.3572
0.0002
0.0050
0.0133
0.0011
0.0501
0.0273
0.0010
0.0019
0.0020
0.0013
0.0282
224
0
0
0
-
0
-
2
3
0
0
0
5
0
1
1
5
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
24
0
0
45341.4884
3379.7972
581.5147
7371.7860M
7253.9820H
2612.0920
166.5056
392.0917
62.7783
152.4800
7.0000
0.2067
2.2560
2029.8360
3000.0000
12.8081
430.9360
40.0000
4.0235
0.0702
78.3328
1.7472
0.2496
367.2350
7.2332
4.1736
299.5970
0.0400
1128.9100
10.7796
25.9500
12018.2920
780.4524
35.4679
3-115
3-121
3-126
I 3-129
3-129
I 3-129
3-129
3-129
3-129
3-130
3-130
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-131
3-132
3-132
3-132
3-132
3-133
3-133
3-133
3-133
3-141
3-149
2-4 Part Summaries EPRD-97
Part
Description
Quality
Level
App. Data
Env. source
Fail. Rate
Fails/(E6)
Total Op. Hours/ Detail
Failed Miles (E6) Page
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica (continued)
Capaci tor,Fixed,Mica,Button
Capac itor,Fixed,Mica,Dipped
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica, Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica,Metallized
Capacitor,Fixed,Mica,Reconstituted
capacitor,Fixed,Mica,silver
Capacitor,Fixed,Network
Capacitor,Fixed,Nylon
Capacitor,Fixed,Oil Filled
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper
capacitor, Fixed, Paper, Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper,Metallized
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper/Plastic (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper/Plastic
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper/Plastic,Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Paper/Plastic,Metallized
Commercial
Military
unknown
Unknown
Military
Unknown
Military
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Unknown
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Military
unknown
Commercial
Commercial
Military
Unknown
commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Military
Military
Unknown
NOGF
AIA
AIC
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
GF
NOGF
GB
GB
DOR
GB
G
DOR
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
DOR
G
GF
GB
DOR
GF
GB
GB
GB
DOR
G
GB
NOGF
G
NOGF
GB
NOGF
NOGF
G
G
GB
24550-000
23035-000
17189-000
13655-000
23035-000
23035-000
11233-000
14851-000
24550-000
13567-022
27027-000
27027-000
11233-000
27027-000
23040-000
11233-000
27027-000
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
27027-000
27027-000
11233-000
14851-000
27027-000
13567-021
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
11233-000
23040-000
13567-022
24550-000
24550-000
23040-000
23040-000
13567-022
13567-023
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.0006
0.0828
4.8388
8.8652
1.5776
0.8343
2.3572
0.0002
0.0133
0.0011
0.0563
1.0610
0.0563
0.0300
0.1134
0.0450
0.0050
2.4390
0.0830
0.0028
0.0031
0.0334
1.5323
0.0100
0.3000
0.0043
0.0003
0.0113
0.0009
25.0000
0.9369
0.0550
0.0008
0.0031
0.0005
0.9369
0.05S0
0.2437
0.0006
0.0003
0.0003
0.0052
0.2232
0.0061
0.0061
25.0000
4.1580
0.0036
0.0036
0.0037
1.4225
0.0037
0.0394
0.0037
0.0036
0.0037
333.3333
0.0384
1.4286
0.0394
0.0434
0.4278
2
0
0
159
5
8
1
2
0
0
-
-
0
-
1
0
-
0
0
0
-
-
0
6
-
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
9
0
0
0
0
3632.7120
0.2067
0.1128
100.7865
5.9932
3.3939
4250.7800
150.4954
906.5540
0.9425
8.8200
200.0000
0.4100
320.5488
29.9507
0.6526
1S98.6450
6.4041
4.1028
2921.6304
192.6665
4.4811
329.0000
0.0400
0.2405
1095.9540
2441.3240
0.0030
0.7000
23.0295
2.3374
3-151
3-152
3-152
3-152
3-152
3-152
3-153
3-153
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-154
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-155
3-156
3-156
3-156
3-156
Pare
Description
Quality
Level
App. Data
Env. Source
Fail. Rate Total Op. Hours/ Detail
Capacitor,Fixed,Plastic (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Plastic
Capacitor,Fixed,Plastic,Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Polycarbonate (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Polycarbonate
Capacitor,Fixed,Polycarbonate,Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Polycarbonate,Metallized
Capacitor,Fixed,Polyester (Summary)
Capacitor,Fixed,Polyester
Capaci tor,Fixed,Polyester,Foil
Capacitor,Fixed,Polyester,Metallized
Capacitor,Fixed,Polypropylene (Summary)
Military
Unknown
Military
Unknown
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Military
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Military
Commercial
Unknown
Commercial
Military
Unknown
Commercial
Military
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
GF
GB
AU
AUA
AUF
DOR
GF
GB
GB
GB
DOR
G
GB
GM
DOR
GB
G
GB
GM
GB
G
GB
GB
DOR
G
GB
DOR
GB
GB
GB
G
GB
GB
AU
AUA
13655-000
23035-000
23035-000
11233-000
14851-000
27027-000
27027-000
11233-000
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
23040-000
13567-022
27030-000
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
23040-000
13567-022
13567-023
11233-000
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
13567-022
13567-023
13567-021
13567-022
13567-023
23040-000
13567-022
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
0.1506
0.2149
0.6112
0.2304
0.8138
0.0331
0.0781
0.0854
0.1903
0.2149
0.6112
0.2304
0.8138
0.0331
0.0781
0.1350
O.0540
0.0072
4.6139M
0.0031
0.0005
0.0421
0.0005
0.1854
4.6139M
0.1854
4.6139M
0.0421
0.0139
4.6139M
0.0201
0.0266
0.0849
2.6434
0.0500
0.4183
4.6139M
0.4183
4.6139M
0.0021
0.0031
0.0034
0.0036
0.0817
0.0005
0.3331
0.3875
2.3742
0.0021
0.0022
0.0020
9.1743
0.0020
0.0784
9.1743
0.0026
0.0026
0.0028
0.0029
0.0495
0.2187
0.2933
0.8604
0.0018
0.0018
0.0021
0.0020
0.0017
0.0020
0.1222
0.0003
0.0003
0.1913
0.2183
2.4194
28
1
2
1
0
-
1
N
0
0
0
0
0
288
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
0
0
16
0
0
4
0
45.8120
4.3399
2.4577
30.2220
12.8081
23.7280
37.5544
11.7780
0.3783
20.0000
2.3907
62.4204M
3530.6700
278.3456
12.2356
2000.0000
2.5805
0.4212
0.1090
5748.9744
344.5338
20.2111
3.4099
1.1622
7771.8576
500.1126
598.3497
2000.0000
8.1822
3-156
3-156
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-157
3-158
3-158
3-162
3-166
3-166
3-166
3-166
3-167
3-167
3-169
3-171
3-172
3-173
3-173
3-175
3-177
3-178
3-178
EPRD-97
Par t
Desc.
C/uality
Level
App Data
Env Source
Part
characteristics
Fail/Hours
or Miles (E6)
Capacitor,Fixed
commercial GB 13567-021-UPI:0150-0012,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:-OlOu,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/209.6172
Pop:161244
-upl:0150-0014,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.000v, 0/11.2632
Pop:8664
-UP:0150-0023,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2000.OOOp, 0/10.9668
voltage Rating:1000.OOOv,Pop:8436
-UPI:0150-0024,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.02Ou,Voltage Rating:600.OOOv, 0/28.6884
Pop:22068
-UPI:0150-0036,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Rating:6000.OOOv, 0/1.6952
Pop:1304
-UPI:0150-0050,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1000.OOOp, 0/492.6844
Voltage RatiTig:1000.000v,Pop:378988
-UPt:0150-0051,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/1.3988
Pop:1076
-UPI:0150-0052,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.050u,Voltage Rating:400.000v, 0/276.6504
Pbp:212808
-PI:301-000-C0J0-339C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:3.300p, 0/22.3028
Voltage Rating:500.OOOv,Pop:17156
-UP*:0150-0063,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:20.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv, 0/0.0104
Pop: 8
-up*:0150-0069,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/1.4144
Pop:1088
-UPI:0150-0070,Mfr:Varlous,Capacitance Va:.020u,Voltage Rating:500.000v, 0/2.9900
Pop:2300
-UP#:0150-0071,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:400.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/9.7708
Pop:7516 \
Pop:11192
-UPI:0150-0073,Mr:Various.Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.000v, 0/7.1500
Pop:5500
-UPI:0150-0075,Mr:Various,capacitance Va:4700.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/6.3544
Pop:4888
-UPt:0150-0081,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Rating:500.00Ov, 0/0.6344
Pop:488
-UP*:0150-0082,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:8200.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/0.3432
Pop:264
-UP#:0150-0084,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.100u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv, 0/31.3872
Pop:24144
-UPI:0150-0085.Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2200.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/1.9968
Pop:1536
-UPI:0150-0091,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1.500p,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/38.7452
Pop:29804
-UPI:0150-0093,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Rating:100.000v, 0/741.5928
' Pop:570456
-UPI:0150-0096,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.050u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv, 0/20.4516
Pop:15732
-UPI:0150-0097,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:6800.000p, 0/0.6448
Voltage Rating:1000.000v,Pop:496
-UPI:0150-011i;Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:220.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/7.1812
Pop:5524
-p*:301-000-U2J-270K,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:27.000p,' 0/10.5092
-PI:301-000-U2JO-470K,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:47.OOOp, 0/2.8132
-UP*:0150-0119,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.010u,Pop:208 0/0.2704
Pop:324256
-UPI:0150-0122,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:2000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.000v, 0/4.5292
Pop:3484
-UP*:0160-0127,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1.000u,voltage Rating:50.OOOv, 16/1262.8252
Pop:971404
-UP:0160-0128,MfrsVarious,Capacitance Va:2.200u,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv, 16/451.5160
Pop:347320
Pop:1136
-UPI:0160-0151,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:4700.OOOp, 0/0.3432
Pop:20912
-UPI:0160-0174,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:-470u,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv, 4/681.5484
Pop:524268
-P:808-557-25U0-102M,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:1000.000p,Pop:5832 0/7.5816
Pop:900
-UPI:0160-0263,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.220u,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv, 0/29.302O
Pop:22540
-PI:565CBA501AV104MA15,Mfr:Cera-Mite Corp..Capacitance Va:.100u, 8/37.1124
-pl:54-804-014-X5V-102P,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc.,Capacitance va:1000.000p, 0/28.9848
-UPI:0160-0375,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2.200p,Voltage Rating:300.000v, 0/0.0208
Pop:16
-pl:301-000-S2J0-339C,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:3.300p, 0/17.5500
-PI:301-000-C0G0-100B,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:10.000p, 0/0.0104
-PI:301-000-P3K0-120J,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:12.OOOp, 0/88.4832
3-2 Part Details EPRD-97
Par t
Desc.
Quality
Level
App Data
Env Source
Part
Characteristics
Fail/Hours
or Miles (E6)
Capacitor,Fixed
Commercial
13567-02l-PI:301-648-U2J0-110G,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:18.OOOp,
-UPI:0160-0468,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.020u,Voltage Rating:500.000v,
Pop:3760
-PI:54-803-003-X5R-101K,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc..Capacitance Va:100.000p,
-PI:2018B104M3P,Mfr:Kyocera International Inc..Capacitance Va:.100u,
-UPf:0160-0552,Mfr:Wright Capacitor Inc..Capacitance Va:100.000p,
-UPI:0160-0562,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:6312
-Pt:VJ0805Y471MFB,Mfr:Vitramon Inc..Capacitance Va:470.000p,
-P#:VJ0805Y102MF,Mfr:Vitramon Inc.,Capacitance Va:1000.000p,
Pop:229192
-UP*:0160-0571,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:368496
-UPf:0160-0572,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2200.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,-
Pop:260380
-UPI :0160-0573,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:4700.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.000v,
Pop:316356
-UPI:0160-0574,Mfr:Varlous,Capacitance Va:.022u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:916768
-UPI:0160-0575,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:-047p,Voltage Rating.-50.OOOv,
Pop:1209788
Pop:6058624
Pop:1056
-UPI:0160-0641,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:22.OOOp,voltage Rating:30.OOOv,
Pop:2648
Pop:520
-UPI:0160-0644,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:30.000v,
Pop:528
-PI:RPE110C0G4R7C50V,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:4.700u,
Voltage Rating:30.000v,pop:1056
Pop:9644
-UPI:0160-0662,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:51.OOOp,Voltage Rating:30.OOOv,
Pop:1228
-PI:K2600/361-102,Mfr;Murata Erie North America Inc.,
Capacitance Va:1000.OOOp,Voltage Ratlng:500.000v,Pop:22552
-PI:33C334,Mfr:Sprague Electric Co.,Capacitance Va:1800.000p,Pop:268
-UPI:0160-0682,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:3.300p,Voltage Rating:200.OOOv,
Pop:4792
-PI :500S47W474MP4,Mfr:VAR, Capacitance Va:.470u, Voltage Rating: 50. OOOv,
Pop:71784
-UPI:0160-0690,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:l.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:49420
-PI:VJ0905AlR8C-F,Mfr:Vitramon inc.,Capacitance Va:1.800p,
Voltage Rating:50.000v, Pop:988
-PI:RPE110C0GlR55C100V,Mfr:Murata Erie North America Inc.,
Capacitance Va:1.500p,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,Pop:1576
-PI:RPE110COG010clOOV,Mfr:Murata Erie North America Inc.,
Capacitance Va:l.OOOp.Voltage Rating:100.000v,Pop:25628
-UPI:0160-0700,Mfr:Various,Capacitance va:150.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:10648
-UPI:0160-0776,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1500.000p,
-PI:54-804-014X5V-560K,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc..Capacitance Va:56.000p,
-UP!:0160-0818,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.020u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:6720
-PI:5855-5XX X5U 503Z,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:.050u,
-UPI:0160-0899,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,
-upl:0160-0904,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va: .050u,Voltage Rating: 1000.OOOv,
Pop:21664
-PI:301-000-U2J0-689C,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:6.800p,
-PI:3905-SA603-Y5U-103Z,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:.010u,
Voltage Rating:5000.000v,Pop:17S2
-UPI:0160-0996,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Rating:2000.000v,
Pop:15860
-PI:54-743-009-X5V-502Z,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc.,Capacitance Va:5000.000p,
-UPI:0160-2055,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:6442232
Pop:344
-UPI:0160-2108,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2000.OOOp,Pop:788
0/9.5680
0/4.8880
0/2.3816
0/4.8932
0/11.9184
0/8.2056
0/1.2896
0/264.8568
4/297.9496
0/479.0448
0/338.4940
0/411.2628
0/1191.7984
4/1572.7244
20/7876.2112
0/1.3728
0/3.4424
0/0.6760
0/0.6864
0/1.3728
0/12.5372
0/1.5964
0/29.3176
0/0.3484
0/6.2296
0/93.3192
0/64.2460
0/1.2844
0/2.0488
0/33.3164
0/13.8424
0/103.0224
0/7.6336
0/8.7360
0/4.1080
0/22.5992
0/28.1632
0/0.2184
4/2.2776
0/20.6180
0/112.7256
20/8374.9016
0/0.4472
0/0.2704
0/1.0244
EPRD-97
Part
Desc.
Quality
Level
. App Data
Env Source
Part
Characteristics
Fail/Hours
or Miles (E6)
Capacitor,Fixed
Commercial
GB 13567-021-UP:0160-2139,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:220.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv,
Pop:27184
-UP!:0160-2140,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Rating:i000.OOOv,
Pop:10684
-UPS:0160-2141,Mir:Various,Capacitance Va:680.000p,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv,
Pop:2488
-UPI:0160-2142,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1500.OOOp,voltage Rating:500.OOOv,
Pop: 8932
-UPI:0160-2144,Mfr:Various,capacitance va:3300.OOOp,
-UP#.-0160-2145,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.000v,
Pop:8480
Pop:5556
-pt:301-000-COK0-518C,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:.Slop,
-PI:301-000-COK0-758C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.750p,
-PI:301-000-COK0-109C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1.000p,
voltage Rating:500.000v,Pop:100268
-PI:301-000-COK0-129C,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:1.200p,
-PI:301-000-COK0-159c,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1.500p,
-PI:301-000-COK0-189c,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1.800p,
-PI:301-000-COK0-209C,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:2.OOOp,
-PI:301-000-C0J0-229c,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:2.200p,
-PI:301-000-NPOO-249C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2.400p,
-UPI: 0160-2243, Mfr .-Various, Capacitance Va:2.700p, Voltage Rating: 500. OOOv,
Pop:36288
-PI:301-000-COJ-309C,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:3.000p,
-PI:301-000-COJ0-369c,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:3.600p,
Pop:38040
-pl:301i000-CON0-439c,Mfr:Various,capacitance va:4.300f,
-UPI:0160-2249,Mfr:Various,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv,Pop:129948
-PI:301-000-COH0-519c,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5.100p,
-pl:301-000-cOH-569C,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:5.600p,
voltage Rating:500.000v,Pop:26300
-PI:301-000-COHO-629C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:6.200p,
-PI :301-000-COH0-689C, Mfr-.Various, capacitance Va:6.800p,
-PI:301-000-COH0-759c,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:7.500p,
-PI:301-000-COHO-829C,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:8.200p,
Voltage Rating:500.000v, Pop:87032
-UPI:0160-2256,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:9.100p,Voltage Ratihg:500.000v,
Pop:16560
Pop:185928
-PI:301-000-COG0-110J,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:11.OOOp,
-UPI .-0160-2259, Mfr .-Various, Capacitance Va:12. OOOp, Voltage Rating: 500. OOOv,
Pop:20312
-PI:301-000-COG0-130J,Mfr:Various,capacitance va:13.OOOp,
Pop:213652
-PI:301-000-COG0-160J,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:16.OOOp,
Pop:48164
Pop:145280
-PI:301-000-GOG0-220J,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:22.000p,, '
Voltage Rating:500. OOOv, Pop:48184
Pop:113284
-UPI:0160-2289,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:2200.OOOp,voltage Rating:200.OOOv,
Pop:21124
Pop:15004
Pop:89728
-PI:54-795-004-X5R-101K,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc.,Capacitance Va:100.000p,
-PI:302-000-U2J0-121J,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:120.000p,
0/35.3392
0/13.8892
0/3.2344
0/11.6116
0/9.4276
0/24.1384
0/11.0240
0/7.2228
0/49.0828
0/16.4788
0/130.3484
0/126.7812
0/50.0032
0/3.7544
0/21.8244
0/46.1916
0/19.7704
0/47.1744
0/68.3124
0/18.5484
0/49.4520
0/18.6524
0/168.9324
0/233.2096
0/34.1900
4/192.0256
0/140.3896
0/18.4392
0/113.1416
0/21.5280
0/241.7064
0/38.2928
0/26.4056
0/23.8212
0/277.7476
0/64.4280
0/62.6132
0/188.8640
0/62.6392
0/147.2692
0/27.4612
0/19.5052
0/116.6464
0/0.0208
0/0.0052
3-4 Part Details EPRD-97
Part
Desc.
Quality
Level
App Data
Env Source
part
Characteristics
Fail/Hours
or Miles (E6)
Capacitor, Fixed
Commercial GB 13567-021-UP*:0160-2403,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:1500.OOOp, 0/9.3652
-UP*:0160-2436.Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:10.000p,Pop:44440 0/57.7720
-UP:0160-2437,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Pop:444184 8/577.4392
-P:2425-061 X5V0 502Z,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Pop:1640 0/2.1320
-UP*:0160-2477,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.015u,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/4.2380
Pop:3260
-UP*:0160-2488,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:220.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.000v, 0/0.0052
Pop: 4
-UPt.'0160-2496,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/4.9556
Pop:3812
-Pt:54-808-001-X5V-102P,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc.,Capacitance Va:1000.000p, 0/4.5240
Pop:3480
-UP*:0160-2544,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:270.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/1.0452
Pop:804
-UP*:0160-2568,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Ratlng:3000.000v, 0/5.7720
Pop:4440
-UP:0160-2569,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.02Ou,Voltage Rating:2000.000v, 0/7.4360
Pop:5720
Pop:1672
-Pt:54802001X5V102P,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc..Capacitance Va:1000.000p, 0/0.3744
Pop:288
Pop:34288
-UP:0160-2606,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.470u,Voltage Rating:25.000v, 0/4.2952
Pop:3304
-UP#:0160-2617.Mr:Various,Capacitance Va:220.000p;Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv, 0/77.2668
Pop:59436
Pop: 12
-P:811-000 X5R 472K,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:4700.000p, 0/0.8164
-UP:0160-2628,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.030u,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/4.1028
Pop:3156
-UP:0160-2630,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1000.000p, 0/0.0052
Voltage Rating:1000.OOOv,pop:4
-PI:811-000 Z5V 682K,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:6800.000p, 0/0.0104
-UP:0160-2634,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:3300.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/25.7556
Pop:19812
-up#:0160-2636,Mr:Various,Capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Ra'ting:3000.000v, 0/2.7144
Pop:2088
-UP*:0160-2639,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv, 0/16.4060
Pop:12620
-UP*:0160-2640,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va: .010u,Voltage Rating-.100.000v, 0/1.0088
Pop:776
-P:301-000-COG0-200G,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:20.000p, 0/6.1464
-UP*:0160-2678,Mfr:various,Capacitance Va:270.OOOp,Voltage Rating:3000.000v, 0/0.0208
Pop:16
-UPi:0160-2743,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:33.OOOp,Voltage Rating:200.000v, 0/31.7824
Pop:24448
-UPI: 0160-2902,Mfr'.Various, Capacitance Va: .010u, Voltage Rating: 1000. OOOv, 0/14.5028
Pop:11156
-UPI:0160-2903,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:.050u,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv, 0/22.1104
Pop:17008
Pop:21548
Pop:16
-UPt: 0160-2930,Mfr .-Various, Capacitance Va: .010u, voltage Rating: 100. OOOv, 0/77.3084
Pop:59468
-UPt:0160-2959,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1000.000p, 0/2.8704
-UP#:0160-2964,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:,010u,Voltage Rating:25.000v, 0/55.8740
Pop:42980
-UP*:0160-2995,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:3.OOOp,Voltage Rating:1000.000v, 0/0.2184
Pop:168
-UP:0160-2997,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:8.200p,Voltage Rating:1000.000v, 0/48.5888
Pop:37376
-UP*:0160-3005,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv. 0/11.9080
Pop:9160
-UP*:0160-3007,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:4700.000p, 0/2.4388
-UP*:0160-3008,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:4700.000p, 0/4.1808
-P*:301-000-COJ0-399B,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:3.9O0p, 0/1.2012
Voltage Rating:500.000v.Pop:924
-Pt:RPE110COG100F100V,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:10.OOOp, 0/1.6120
-P:RPE110C0G7R5D100V,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:7.500p, 0/106.8080
Voltage Rating:100.OOOv.Pop:82160
-UP:0160-3036,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.000p,Pop:327368 0/425.5784
-UP* .-0160-3042, Mfr: Various, Capacitance Va: .033u.Voltage Rating: 100. OOOv, 0/0.2860
Pop:220
-P:565CBZ251AT502MA03.Mfr:Cera-Mite Corp..Capacitance VasSOOO.OOOp,Pop:520 0/0.6760
Pop:45684
EPRD-97 Part Details 3-5
Part
Desc.
Quality
Level
App Data
Env source
Part
Characteristics
Fail/Hours
or Miles (E6)
Capac itor,Fixed
Commercial GB 13567-021-UPt:0160-3075,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv,
Pop:2748
-PJ:845-200V-P3K0-471J,Mfr:Tusonix,capacitance Va:470.000p,
-P*:301-000-s2H0-220F,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:22.000p,
-UPI:0160-3094,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.lOOu,Voltage Rating:100.000v,
Pop:204764
-UP*:0160-3097,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.470u,Voltage Rating:50.000v,
Pop:107476
-p#:54-804-002-x5P-150K,Mfr:Spectrum Control Inc.,Capacitance Va:15.000p.
-PI:RDPLX060200PFKU500V,Mfr:Stettner & Co..Capacitance Va:200.000p,
-UPt:0160-3134,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.010u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:3368
-UP*:0160-3142,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:62.000p,Voltage Rating:30.OOOv,
Pop:528
-UPI:0160-3144,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:82.000p,Voltage Rating:30.000v,
Pop:528
-PI:CK31BT103M,Mfr:AVX Corp..Voltage Rating:50.000v,Pop:336
-p*:301-000-U2J0-120J,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:12.000p,
-P*:56892-l,Mfr:Republic Electronics Corp.,Capacitance Va:470.000p,
-UP:0160-3208,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:.025u,Voltage Rating:100.OOOv,
Pop:35264
-UP#:0160-3219,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:500.OOOv,
Pop:33796 , ',
-P*:57438-l,Mfr:Republic Electronics Corp.,Capacitance Va:4.700p,
Pop:6428
Pop:1408
-upl:0160-3334,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:-010u,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv,
Pop:1163596
-UP#:0160-3335,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:470.OOOp,Voltage Rating:100.000v,
Pop:6576144
-UPI :0160-3336,Mfr:Various,Capacit'ance Va:100.OOOp,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv,
Pop:147776
. Pop:826808
-P* :'564CBA302EF102WA22,Mf r :Cera-Mite Corp.,Capacitance Va: 1000. OOOp.
-PI:562CZZ501AE102MA59,Mfr:Cera-Mite Corp.,Capacitance Va:1000.000p,
-UPI:0160-3422,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:l.OOOp,Voltage Rating:50.OOOv,
Pop:988
-PI:301-000-R2G0-330J,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:33.000p,
voltage Rating:500.000v,pop:456
Pop:312
-pl:301-000-S3B0-639D,Mfr:Tusonix,Capacitance Va:6.800p,
-p#:HT55T309KD,Mfr:Inductothenn Corp..Capacitance Va:3.000p,
Pop:206184
Pop:2292
Pop:23908
voltage Rating:250000.OOOv,Pop:10204
Pop:6588
Pop:100548
-UPI: 0160-3452,Mfr-.Various, Capacitance Va: .020u, Voltage Rating: 100. OOOv,
Pop:6508
Pop:65916
Pop:475868
Pop:74012
-upl:0160-3456.Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:1000.000p,
-UPI:0160-3457,Mfr:Various,capacitance Va:2000.000p,
-UP*:0160-3458,Mfr:Various,Capacitance Va:5000.OOOp,Voltage Rating:250.OOOv,
Pop:16932
Pop:197576
0/3.5724
0/0.4420
0/3.9676
0/266.1932
0/139.7188
0/3.5672
0/9.3184
0/4.3784
0/0.6864
0/0.6864
0/0.4368
0/1.1232
0/0.0104
0/45.8432
0/43.9348
0/0.0104
0/8.3564
0/1.8304
0/1512.6748
0/8548.9872
0/192.1088
0/1074.8504
0/22.0168
0/2.2464
0/1.2844
0/0.5928
0/0.4056
0/2.8340
0/2.5480
0/3.4736
4/268.0392
0/2.9796
0/31.0804
0/60.1744
0/13.2652
0/8.5644
0/130.7124
0/8.4604
0/85.6908
0/618.6284
0/96.2156
4/1404.2444
0/75.7848
0/22.0116
0/256.8488
EPRD-97 Data Sources 4-1
11233-000
Title: "Dormancy'And Power On-Off Cycling Effects On Electronic Equipment And Part
Reliability"; August 1973; Bauer, J., Cottrell, D.F., Gagnier, T.R.; AD-A768 619;
Contract No. F30602-72-C-0243; RADC-TR-73-248; Martin Marietta Corporation.
Abstract: The data from this document was the result of 2-12 month programs. The first
program was to collect, study, and analyze reliability information on dormant
military electronic equipment and parts and to develop current dormant failure
rates, factors, and prediction techniques. The second program studied similar
equipment/parts subjected to power on-off cycling, to correlate failure incidence
with power on-off cycling and to quantify power on-off cycling effects with respect
to dormancy and operating states.
12449-000
Title: Source Proprietary.
Abstract: This data source contains part replacement data from reliability tests of the
AN/SPS-48 Radar Set which was used to evaluate potential problems in component
reliability. Data was collected from 1977 through 1984.
12569-000
Title: Source Proprietary-
Abstract: This source represents data taken from the Air Force 66-1 field maintenance records
on the AN/ASK-6,' AN/SPG-63, CPR075/AIK, and AN/ASW-38 from the F-15 aircraft during
the year 1981.
13567-007
Abstract: Data from this source is warranty repair data from a large manufacturer of
commercial electronic/computer equipment used primarily in ground applications.
Part replacements have been reported'and part hours have been estimated from
typical use profiles. This source covers warranty period from May 1978 to April
1979.
13567-008
Part replacements have been reported and part hours have been estimated from
1980.
13567-009
1981.
13567-010
1982.
13567-011
typical use profiles. This source covers warranty period from May.1982 to April
1983.

Electronic Parts Reliability Data

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Electronic Parts Reliability Data

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

EPRD-97

Вам также может понравиться