Second Seminar Evaluation Form (PSM 2)

1

A. Delivery and Presentation
Criteria 0 1

2

3

4

5

Appearance Unprepared Badly dressed Badly dressed Well dressed Smartly dressed

Very smartly
dressed

Use of
multimedia or
visual aid
effectively.
No
presentation
Bad use of
multimedia for
presentation
Very weak
multimedia usage
for presentation
Good usage of
multimedia for
presentation
Good usage of
multimedia for
presentation

Effective visual aids
using multimedia
technology

Presentation
skills.
No
presentation
Presentation
needs to be
improved a lot

Presentation
needs slight
improvement
Average presentation Good presentation
Very good
presentation
Methodology
Project
methodology
is not stated
at all
A lot of steps and
procedures are
missing.
Some steps and
procedures are not
given
All the steps and
procedures are given but
not explained
All the steps and
procedures are presented
All the steps and
procedures are well
presented
Result and
analysis.
No result and
discussion
sentence
Results and analysis
are poorly presented
Results and analysis
are not clear
Results are presented but
not well analysed.
Results and analysis are
presented
Results are well
presented and
analysed.
Project
achievement.
No
achievement
Little achievement Some achievement Moderate achievement
Good achievement as
planned.
Excellent achievement
better than expected
Discussion.
No
discussion at
all
Discussion are clear
at all
Show limited
discussion
Fair discussions are
presented
Discussions are presented
but not related to
objectives.
Discussions are well
elaborated in line with
the results and
objectives.

Respond to the
given question
clearly and
confidently.

No
presentation
Cannot understand
the question and
unable to respond
Minimum ability to
respond to the
question.
Able to respond some
of the time
Able to respond
constructively most of
the time.
Able to respond
constructively and
convincingly at all
times.

Second Seminar Evaluation Form (PSM 2)
2

B. Achievement and Project Demonstration
Criteria 0 1

2

3

4

5

Project
functionality and
finishing
No demo
session
Not functioning with
little development of
the project
functioning with limited
development of the
project
Functioning with some
errors.
Fully functioning with
partial perfection in the
development

Fully functioning
with perfectly
developed project

Project
complexity and
quality
Project is too
simple and has
no quality
Simple project with
very low quality.
Moderate complexity
with low quality
Modest complexity with
average quality
Very complex project
with moderate quality
Very complex
project with high
quality

Project
outcomes
market potential
and research
advancement

-commercial
value
-usefulness
-research
advancement

No product or
no research
output
(simulation
results and
evaluation)
No commercial
value and not useful,
or no research
advancement (e.g.,
improved algorithms,
improved processed,
etc.)
No commercial value
but useful, or no
research output but
has research
advancement
Lack of commercial value
and useful, insufficient
research output and
advancement
Moderate commercial
value and useful, or
moderate research
output and
advancement
High commercial
value and very
useful, or high
research output
and advancement