Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Cross
God Saves More
than People
Session 10
worship and prayer
e article indicated that of most biographies that are around, few devote
more than ten percent of their pages to the subject’s death – including
biographies of men like Martin Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, Steve
Biko and Oscar Romero who died violent and politically significant
deaths. e Gospels, though, devote nearly a third of their length to the
climactic last week of Jesus’ life. Only two of the Gospels mention the
events of his birth, but each chronicler gives a detailed account of the
events leading to Jesus’ death. It must be that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and
John saw death as the central mystery of Jesus. Nothing remotely like it
had happened before.1
But what did Jesus intend by it all? What did he think would happen
next? Why did he walk into trouble in this way? And why, after his own
violent death, did anyone take him seriously any longer, let alone
suppose that he was the living embodiment of the one true God?2 What
was the meaning of the cross and Jesus’ death? As the article indicated, it
is important that we distinguish between the historical meaning and the
theological meaning of the cross. e present article focused on the
historical meaning of the cross and ended with some reflection questions.
Let’s first take a few moments to dialog about the first four questions:
After about 5-10 minutes lead participants to dialog about the latter five
questions which are more personal:
• How does this article affect you in terms of your own personal faith
and your spiritual journey?
• What would it imply for you to ‘take up your cross’ in your
community/city? Would you be ready?
• What would it imply for people in your church to ‘take up their cross’
your community/city?
• What are ways that you and your church are called to take up your
cross? What issues and injustices in your community and city can
only be overcome by a movement of ‘cross-bearing’ disciples?
• What would happen in your community/city if a growing number of
churches took up their cross the way Jesus commanded his disciples to
do?
In this session we will focus the bulk of our attention on the theological
meaning of the cross, though. e New Testament focuses on the
theological meaning of the cross – i.e. Jesus as the Savior from sin and evil
– far more than it focuses on the immediate historical meaning of the
cross – i.e. Jesus the social revolutionary. One of the reasons for this is
that the historical meaning of the cross was obvious to the contemporaries
of the New Testament writers – it’s like saying today that Jesus died as a
political prisoner or freedom fighter on the electrical chair or by a
So what happened on the cross? What did Jesus accomplish? What was
the purpose of the cross, apart from the historical meaning we already
looked at? What kind of salvation did he bring about? How could his
death and subsequent resurrection bring salvation and restoration to
the world?
In the following group study we will seek to look through six different
windows in our house onto the theological meaning of the cross. In doing
so we will see that the cross was God’s primary way to deal with the
powers of evil and destroy those forces who oppose his divine intentions
on earth. e cross was God’s way to set the stage for the renewal of his
creation to once more reflect his divine intentions: Shalom on earth as it is
in heaven!
In making a public spectacle of them Jesus exposed to the universe the evil
powers’ utter helplessness, leading them ‘in him’ in his triumphal
procession so that all the world might see the greatness of his victory. On
his cross, he made a mockery of the powers and authorities by disarming
them, i.e. by making their weapon – the cross – redundant. So how exactly
did Christ defeat the principalities and powers of the world’s cities and
empires? Paul tells us that on the cross Christ “cancelled the written
code” (i.e., the system or mosaic of religious, cultural, political and
economic rules and regulations which ordered all life throughout both
Judaism and the Roman Empire).6 He forgave our sins, freed us from the
authority of the city’s and empire’s systems over our lives, and granted us
freedom in Christ. By such redemptive action, the power of the systems
and their principalities (both earthly and demonic) has been broken, both
over the church and over all society.7 In other words, the work of Christ is
defeating and redeeming God’s enemies, which can be spiritual beings or
such things as the social, economic, and political structures that comprise
the elements of the kosmos and estrange both people and societies from
God.
What’s, then, the only thing that can undermine this reign of fear? e
cross! It takes the weapon of the kingdom of Satan, and turns it against
Satan. 1 Corinthians 15:54b-57 summarizes it well: e death of Jesus
effectively dealt with this problem because “he made atonement for the
sins of the people” through his death. He conquered death! We can be
released from Satan’s power and freed from fear of death to serve God by
the forgiveness or cleansing made possible by Jesus’ death. By his death
and resurrection Jesus has destroyed Satan’s final weapon.10
2. rough Jesus’ Death the Cosmos and the Principalities and Powers are
Saved from Self-destruction
John 3:16-17 is perhaps too well known for us to be analytical toward it.
We recite it without much thought, our minds shaped by it primary use –
as the Scripture passage used to introduce an individual to Christ. In the
light of such popularity, it is important to assert that the Greek word John
uses which is frequently interpreted individualistically (“God so loved Juan
Garcia that he gave…”) is not an individualistic word. It is the word
‘kosmos’ – the entire created order. It does not mean the physical earth;
the word ‘oikoumene’ was used for the inhabited world. Nor does it mean
people; the word ‘laos’ would be used if referring only to humans. e
word ‘kosmos’ was used in Scripture to refer to the universe, the heavens,
and the earth and all its inhabitants (both human and non-human), the
scene and systems of human activity; the order of things. It is an all-
encompassing word and means “the totality of existence.”13 To capture
the power and implications of what John was writing in this passage, let us
translate it this way:14
“For God so loved the cosmos that he gave his one and only Son, that
whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God
did not send his Son into the cosmos to condemn the cosmos, but to save
the cosmos through him” or
It is crucial to understand that John chose to use the word ‘kosmos’ in this
passage. Perhaps the most precise of all biblical writers in his use of
Greek, John would not have used the word if he had not meant ‘cosmos’.
If he had simply meant ‘people’, he would have said so. In short, this
passage is not written to deal simply with the redemption of human
beings (although it includes them). It is referring to the redemption of the
universe, the geophysical world, the social systems, and structures of
humanity, and the entire human enterprise. In other words – the entire
created order. It is the ‘cosmos’ that God does not want to condemn and
have perish, but which he wants to save and for which he has provided a
way of salvation through his one and only Son.15 Christ’s death and
ese verses are among Paul’s most illuminating statements about Christ
and the meaning of his death. Paul presents Jesus here as the cosmic
Christ.17 What he is specifically referring to is that both the socio-
political structures of society and the spiritual forces behind and within
those structures were created by Christ. ese created “powers are both
heavenly and earthly, divine and human, spiritual and political, invisible
and structural.” ey are the “inner and outer aspects of any given
manifestation of power”, according to Walter Wink. Paul goes on to say
that the powers and systems were originally a divine creation and were to
find their goal in Christ. ey were created for only one purpose: “To
glorify God and to enjoy him forever” – in other words, to be centered on
God and the service of God’s creation.18
In the meantime, until Jesus’ return, the passage affirms, we humans have a
mandate to work with God in creation’s restoration. Christ calls his
followers to participate in the world’s systems, to promote his values and
love as we have opportunity; to participate with him in the first skirmishes
of the liberation of his creation. Christ’s saving grace starts its work inside
us, but simultaneously works its way out through our influence. God’s
power and purposes begin to penetrate our values, worldview,
relationships, career choices and community involvements. As God’s
managers of the earth, we then begin to reclaim the devil’s territory, as it
were, by redirecting social systems and cultural values so that people and
creation benefit instead of being exploited.46
xx
minutes
Divide participants into three groups and assign each group its texts. Give
groups about 15 minutes time to read the texts and discuss their answers to the
questions. Have groups present their findings to the plenary. As groups present
their findings, project the texts on screen via PowerPoint and fill in insights they
might have left out from below, using the PowerPoint Outline.
Jesus’ death tore down dividing walls by calling people from divergent
backgrounds to give up their differences and concentrate instead on the
generousness of Christ’s sacrifice. Christ’s death enables people to live in
koinonia (community/fellowship), as they become partakers in the
Salvation brought about by Jesus. eir koinonia with Jesus must manifest
itself in koinonia that crosses barriers with other believers, which is best
seen in the Lords Supper. e Lord’s supper is not a religious
remembrance ritual, but instead a call to “life together”, to forgiveness, to
sharing, to intentional community. Only in remembrance of the cross,
koinonia can deepen and mature, because it involves the crucifying of one’s
own self-justice, egocentrism, and selfishness – openly admitting one’s own
dark sides. e result is a preparedness to be honest and in open
communion with other Christians, showing oneself vulnerable.
In effect, what the New Testament is saying, then, is that in enduring the
cross, Jesus turned his culture’s weapon of shame against his culture, he
“scorned” or “despised” its shame. (Hebrews 12:2). He refused to be
ashamed of what they wanted him to be ashamed of. Instead, he made
them ashamed of what they ought to have been ashamed of. e cross
calls us to step out of the culture that uses shame to make us conform. We
are to follow Jesus: “Who also suffered outside the city gate to make the
people holy through his own blood. Let us then go to him outside the
camp, bearing the disgrace he bore.” (Hebrews 13:12-13)50
So what remedy is there? Paul explains that through Jesus’ death, Christ
took our sins upon himself to turn aside God’s deserved wrath and
punishment of sinners. To avert that God would no longer intervene on
humanity’s behalf and let their own wrongdoings fall on their head. As
Jesus hung on the cross of Calvary, it was literally the sin of the world that
was hanging there at that moment of history. Jesus became the sin of the
world. Yet, it was not Jesus who was judged on that cross, but the sin of
humankind that was judged and condemned. What follows is absolutely
central to the gospel’s portrayal of salvation: Jesus did not die on the cross
to reconcile God to us, as the blood atonement theory has it, but to
reconcile us to God.53 God loved humans so much to send Jesus to take
humans’ sin upon himself on the cross. Because of him – the only sinless
human – God will not withdraw himself from humanity and abandon us
to our own evil and the evil of the perverted principalities and powers.54
In other words, Jesus’ death allows a sinner, who has broken God’s
commandments and sinned against his Shalom ethics, to own
responsibility for oneself and to repent; to ask forgiveness; to get right
with God; to be born again; to get out of the slavery of Satan and begin a
life of obedience to God through repentance and faith. No matter how
sinful and broken, no matter how poor, oppressed and malnourished, we
can repent of our sins, receive divine forgiveness and enter into a personal
living relationship with the holy Creator that will last eternally. We are
saved, when we repent of our sin, believe in Christ and submit to the reign
of Christ and his vision of Shalom in our lives.55
Divide participants into two groups. Have the first group reflect on and discuss
the first two questions plus the quote. Have the second group reflect on and
discuss the last two questions plus the quote. Give them about 15-20 minutes to
discuss their answers.
Group 1:
• In light of all we’ve reflected upon in our exploration of scriptures
today – why did Jesus have to die?
• What difference would it make in our ministry and practice of our
faith for us to believe that God saves more than people? at God is
actively at work seeking to redeem the structures, the systems of the
city or nation – or even the city or nation itself?
Group 2:
• Holding to a doctrine of salvation as outlined in our Scripture Study
today, what would you suspect Christ would call the church to be and
do in your nation?
• Why do you think so many churches have been so reluctant to accept
the centrality of restoring Shalom on earth in the gospel?
Both Groups:
ink about how you would explain the Gospel to a non-believer after all
that we studied in this and the previous sessions. Take a few minutes to
formulate how you would present the Gospel of the Kingdom. Discuss
with your group members how you would go about it, and come prepared
to share your findings with the whole group.
xx 1. Read the following quote and reflect on it. Do you agree? What are
minutes specific ways that you as individual could put the insight from this quote
2. Read the article “e Purpose of the Church”, answer the reflection
questions in the article, and come prepared to share your findings with
other members of your group.
3. Read the article “e eological Meaning of the Cross” to review the
material we studied today. If you feel like it, you can also read the article
“e Resurrection of Christ – e Historical Evidence” for your own
enjoyment.
closing prayer
Ask a participant to close in prayer.
5
minutes
total time:
xx minutes
regulatory system or whether he is making reference to the entire “written code” that
regulated all life – both Jewish and Gentile – in the Roman Empire. is study has taken
it to mean the latter, but holding the former would not detract in any way from the
argument presented regarding this Scripture passage.
7 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 132
the Western Gospel to be obnoxiously cheap, because its beginning and end appears to be
that Jesus died so that Christians can get a free ride to heaven. (Vishal Mangalwadi,
Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 37)
12 e Christus Victor motif, established in these verses, then, gets beyond an exclusively
individualistic understanding of sin and salvation and hints to the social and cosmic
aspects of salvation. is understanding of Christ’s death provides a rational for
Christians to believe that Christ can transform culture, since it recognizes that Christ is
Lord over natural and supernatural powers, over systems and structures as well as over
persons; his Kingdom is cosmic in scope.
13 e Greek word for world—kosmos—can be employed either broadly or narrowly. In
the New Testament both uses occur. We can only understand which usage is correct by
reading a particular text in light of the overall message of scripture. When we consider
the command to hate the world, or when we seek to understand Christ’s words that his
followers are not of the world, we must understand kosmos narrowly to mean the effects
wrought on the creation by the Fall. us, we should hate the effects of the Fall, and as
children of God we are obliged to flee from sin and remain distinct from the fallen
world. If in these passages we read kosmos broadly—as if it meant all of creation—we are
faced with the problem of squaring hatred of the world, as well as separation from it, with
Christ’s command to be salt and light in a world that is sorely in need of both. If we
separate ourselves from the kosmos (broadly construed) because we are not part of the
world, we forfeit the possibility of engaging as salt and light, for being salt and light
requires active participation in the creation. Furthermore, if we take Christ’s use of
kosmos broadly and in so doing retreat from engaging the world, then this implies that
the command to oversee God’s creation, given to man in Genesis 1, has been rescinded.
But there is simply no biblical support for such a position. Christ came to fulfill the law,
not abolish it. Indeed, scripture tells us that, “God so loved the world (kosmos) that he
gave his only Son” ( John 3:16). Here it seems clear that kosmos is intended in the broad
sense—Christ died for all of creation. (Mark T. Mitchell, A eology of Engagement for
the ‘Newest Internationalists’, e Brandywine Review of Faith and International Affairs,
Spring 2003, 16)
time we take creation to be wholly evil due to the Fall (that is, if we deny creation’s on-
going structural goodness), then we have God loving evil and giving his Son for its
redemption. One only redeems that which is redeemable, and that which is redeemable is
necessarily good. Christ died for the totality of creation, which has been effaced by sin,
but the underlying structural goodness of creation remains intact. us the distinction
between sacred and secular is a false dichotomy. Instead, the creation, properly conceived,
should be seen in terms of two very different categories: redeemed vs. unredeemed—or
(and this is another way of saying the same thing), those under the Lordship of Christ vs.
those in rebellion. (Mark T. Mitchell, A eology of Engagement for the ‘Newest
Internationalists’, e Brandywine Review of Faith and International Affairs, Spring
2003, 16)
17 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 119
He is co-eternal with God (“He is before all things”… and the “firstborn over all
creation”). He is co-Creator of the universe and everything that is in it; everything
material and everything spiritual. He is even the ruler over the competing power
networks of the world, since he is the creator of thrones, powers, rulers, and authorities
along with “all things in heaven and earth, visible and invisible,” they were created “in”,
“through” and “for” him. at is, Christ is the creator and sustainer of both the demonic/
angelic possessors of power and the political, economic, religious, and social systems,
structures, and personalities of power. ey were created, Paul contends, as an integral
part of the universe God had planned. (Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan,
119)
18 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 119
19 Bob Moffit, If Jesus Were Mayor, 61
20 Bruce Bradshaw, Change Across Cultures, 45
21 Bob Moffit, If Jesus Were Mayor, 61
22 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 119-120
23 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 119-120
Indeed, through his death and resurrection Jesus was the first to conquer death, “so that
in everything he might have the supremacy” (v. 18).
24 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
Reconciliation focuses on the conviction that the most basic thing about humans is not
their sin but their restoration. Reconciliation consists in spirited actions, often very
ordinary everyday ones, against the anti-creational forces that violate creation’s integrity
and degrade and destroy (Bruce Bradshaw, Change Across Cultures, 45-46)
26 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
and cooking—the list is as long as creation is broad—are all in need of the redemption
Christ provides and which is administered through “Christ’s ambassadors”.
35 Mark T. Mitchell, A eology of Engagement for the ‘Newest Internationalists’, e
Since sin is not just personal, the whole creation needed to be saved. We see, then, that in
Romans Paul is teaching that there is no dichotomy between the individual and his
corporate environment (whether social or physical). It is all corrupted by sin. And God
has provided for the redemption of it all. (Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan,
118)
41 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
Unless creation as a whole is put to rights, it might look as though God the Creator had
blundered or was weak and incapable, or was actually unjust. No, declares Paul: the
renewal of creation, the birth of the new world from the laboring womb of the old, will
demonstrate that God is in the right. (Ibid, 126)
45 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
their families, coworkers, churches, communities, culture, and the environment! Where it
doesn’t, the conversion was not full. (Based in parts on personal notes taken during a
course offered by Robert Linthicum entitled “Building a People of Power”)
47 Melba Padilla Maggay, Transforming Society, 25
It is not that ‘faith’ occurs first as an inner existential leap of the individual… and then
God operates a change in him which enables him to love his brethren… ese two
cannot be distinguished. In other words, conversion does not take place in two moves –
first, a conversion to Christ, and then a ‘second conversion’ from Christ to the world.
Both occur in one single act.
48 Vishal Mangalwadi, Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 34
49 Carson, D. A. 1994. New Bible Commentary: 21st century edition. Rev. ed. of: e
new Bible commentary. 3rd ed. / edited by D. Guthrie, J.A. Motyer. 1970. (4th ed.) .
Inter-Varsity Press: Leicester, England; Downers Grove, Ill., USA
50 Vishal Mangalwadi, Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 35-36
51 All people are sinners standing under God’s holy condemnation. “All have sinned and
fall short of the Glory of God” (3:23). ere is a clear consistent warning. e Holy
possible. God is not a stern and inflexible magistrate but a loving parent. Why, then, was
a redemptive act necessary? Because our resentment toward God and our will to kill leave
us unable to turn to God. God needs no reparation, but human beings must be extracted
from their own prison if they are to be capable of accepting the pure gift of freely offered
love… It is not God who must be appeased, but humans who must be delivered from
their hatred of God. Jesus absorbed all the violence directed at him by the authorities and
the powers but still loved them. If humanity killed the one who fully embodied God’s
intention for our lives and God still loves us, then there is no need to try to earn God’s
love. And if God loves us unconditionally, there is no need to seek conditional love from
the various powers who promise us rewards in return for devotion. (Walter Wink, e
Powers at Be, 92)
54 Jesus became sin for us. He took our punishment. He bore vicariously the wrath of
God upon sin. He died on the cross as our substitute. Since Jesus loved sinners so much
and became the sin of the world Himself on the cross, humans can find forgiveness for
their sin through faith in the death of Christ, as the final and complete sin-offering; they
can have a renewed relationship with God and life eternal rather than eternal separation
from God in the claws of evil.
55 ?
But conversely, if a person does not personally accept the death of Christ as a means to
his salvation from sin, then s/he cannot be saved; s/he will have to take the full
consequences of sin before a perfectly Holy God. Many people find it hard to accept that
the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross is the only means of finding forgiveness for one’s sin.
But who else ever became sin for the world? In the whole of human history Jesus is the
only one who took human’s sin upon Himself. Indeed, we can ignore the theological
meaning of the cross only at eternal cost to ourselves. e New Testament, consequently,
affirms that the renewal of society begins with the renewal of individuals who pass from
death to life, from unrighteousness to righteousness. e true key to Shalom lies with the
quality of life the people lead. Holistic reform can only happen as a consequence of
repentance. us, Jesus’ death on the cross brings together God’s wrath and God’s mercy.
It saves individuals from self-destruction/eternal separation from God and his Shalom. It
saves humans from having God eternally withdraw from humanity and give them over
the clutches of evil.
56 Based on classnotes from course by Robert Linthicum, Building a People of Power