Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Cross
God Saves More than People
Session 10
Homework
homework: practicing the way of the cross
1. Read the following quote and reflect on it. Do you agree? W hat are
specific ways that you as individual could put the insight from this quote
into practice this week? What are specific ways that you could get your
church to put the insights from this quote into practice? Share with other
members of the group one specific way in which you will put the insights
from this quote into practice this week. Be prepared to share with them
how you did during next week’s session.
“In our ministry as churches we often have focused too much on individuals
rather than the whole cosmos. Because the church has defined sin
individualistically – the naughty things we individually do – the church has
then had to construct a theology of salvation that was individual and a theology
of mission of the church that was individual, thus missing the far more
comprehensive picture of what God has actually done to make this world fully
the world he created it to be. Salvation, as we have seen in these passages,
however, is individual, corporate and systemic; vertical and horizontal. Jesus
pleads us that we need to make a relationship between preaching, advocating
justice and ministering to the poor, by defining redemption “as restoring the
elements of creation to fulfill the purposes for which God created them”. is
understanding of redemption provides a rational for Christians to pray for and
work for the transformation of our societies here on earth. Did Jesus ask us to
pray that we might go to heaven, or that the kingdom of heaven might come on
this earth? e latter of course! erefore the church must be focused on more
than people! It needs to be focused on individuals but also on the restoration and
transformation of the political, religious, economic and social systems of its
nations, including all the domains worldwide.” 1
2. Read the article “e Purpose of the Church”, answer the reflection
questions in the article, and come prepared to share your findings with
other members of your group.
3. Read the article “e Historical Meaning of the Cross” to review the
material we studied today. If you feel like it, you can also read the article
“e Resurrection of Christ – e Historical Evidence” for your own
enjoyment.
reflection questions
Before reading on, take a moment to reflect on the following questions and write
your answers to the questions into your Application Journal. Come prepared to
share your answers with other members of your group in the next class session:
• Why does your Church exist? Does your Church know its purpose
and mission?
• What drives your Church? Do any of the driving forces described
above characterize your Church?
• What activities does your Church spend most time doing? Is there
anything you think needs to change?
application journal:
So what happened on the cross? What did Jesus accomplish? What was
the purpose of the cross, apart from the historical meaning we already
looked at? What kind of salvation did he bring about? How could his
death and subsequent resurrection bring salvation and restoration to the
world?
Explaining the theological meaning of the cross may be like trying to see
the whole beautiful, majestic sky from one of the windows of your house.
You can see part of the sky through your window, and you can go to the
other rooms of your house and look through other windows too. But even
after looking out all of the windows, you aren’t seeing the whole sky – you
aren’t seeing to the end of the sky, which is infinite through each window,
and is more than even all the windows can show you. It’s the same in
theology. Trying to explain the meaning of the cross is like looking
through different windows in your house. ere are different theological
explanations or theories. Each of these is like looking through one of the
windows of your house, granted some may be larger than others! Yet, not
even one of these theories can give you the whole sky, as none of your
windows can. Our best formulations thus don’t give us the whole sky, just
a window in it. Nonetheless, even though we know we may not grasp the
whole sky, having a theory is better than staring at a blank wall or even a
picture hanging on the wall, or even tapping in the dark, since there are no
windows.6
In what follows we will seek to look through six different windows in our
house onto the theological meaning of the cross. In doing so we will see
that the cross was God’s primary way to deal with the powers of evil and
destroy those forces that oppose his divine intentions on earth. e cross
What’s, then, the only thing that can undermine this reign of fear? e
cross! It takes the weapon of the kingdom of Satan, and turns it against
Satan. 1. Corinthians 15:54b-57 summarizes it well: e death of Jesus
effectively dealt with this problem because “he made atonement for the
sins of the people” through his death. He conquered death! We can be
released from Satan’s power and freed from fear of death to serve God by
Window 2: rough Jesus’ Death the Cosmos and the Principalities and
Powers are Saved from Self-destruction
“For God so loved the cosmos that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever
believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God did not send his
Son into the cosmos to condemn the cosmos, but to save the cosmos through him”
or “God so loved the entire created order – including people, systems, structures,
celestial beings – that he gave his one and only son,… so that the entire created
order might not perish but might have eternal life.”
It is crucial to understand that John chose to use the word ‘kosmos’ in this
passage. Perhaps the most precise of all biblical writers in his use of
Greek, John would not have used the word if he had not meant ‘kosmos’.
If he had simply meant ‘people’, he would have said so. In short, this
passage is not written to deal simply with the redemption of human
beings (although it includes them). It is referring to the redemption of the
universe, the geophysical world, the social systems, and structures of
humanity, and the entire human enterprise. In other words – the entire
created order. It is the ‘cosmos’ that God does not want to condemn and
have perish, but which he wants to save and for which he has provided a
way of salvation through his one and only Son.18 Christ’s death and
resurrection, then, is giving remedy for the downward cycle of society.
God, through Jesus Christ, has made a way to restore the ‘kosmos’ – the
created order including people, systems, structures, celestial beings – to its
original purpose. Jesus’ death IS God’s way to redeem all things
unredeemed, and bring under the Lordship of Christ all things in
rebellion to him.19 ose who have been redeemed by him, are then called
to work with God in the redemption of all things not yet redeemed and
bring under the Lordship of Christ all things in rebellion to him!
ese verses, then, are among Paul’s most illuminating statements about
Christ and the meaning of his death. Paul presents Jesus here as the
cosmic Christ. He is co-eternal with God (“He is before all things”… and
the “firstborn over all creation”). He is co-Creator of the universe and
everything that is in it; everything material and everything spiritual. He is
even the ruler over the competing power networks of the world, since he is
the creator of thrones, powers, rulers, and authorities along with “all things
in heaven and earth, visible and invisible,” they were created “in”, “through”
and “for” him. at is, Christ is the creator and sustainer of both demonic/
angelic possessors of power, as well as the political, economic, religious,
and social systems, structures, and personalities of power. ey were
created, Paul contends, as an integral part of the universe God had
planned.23 is doesn’t mean that Christ created the Roman state or the
capitalist economic system. is would make him responsible for all of
these systems’ failures. No, what Paul is specifically referring to is that
both the socio-political structures of society and the spiritual forces behind
and within those structures were created by Christ. ese created “powers
are both heavenly and earthly, divine and human, spiritual and political,
invisible and structural”. ey are the “inner and outer aspects of any
given manifestation of power”, according to theologian Walter Wink.
Paul goes on to say that the powers and systems were originally a divine
creation and were to find their goal in Christ. ey were created for only
one purpose: “To glorify God and to enjoy him forever” – in other words,
to be centered on God and the service of God’s creation.24 However,
when the principalities and powers fell, and turned against him in
rebellion, God sent Jesus as God’s representative to reconcile all things to
him and transform and redeem the systems and powers. Jesus, then, is not
only co-creator with God of all the structures and powers of the cosmos.
He is also their redeemer. rough his redemptive work on the cross, Jesus
Christ has reconciled the entire cosmos (whether things on earth or things
in heaven”) to God. Who is reconciled? Everyone. Everything. Not just
people, but “thrones… powers… rulers… authorities” (or as it says in other
translations “thrones… dominions… principalities… powers): the heavenly
order (the angelic and demonic forces) and the earthly order (the systems
and structures, the material world, all human beings). Everything and
everyone! Indeed, through his death and resurrection Jesus was the first to
conquer death, “so that in everything he might have the supremacy” (v.
18).25 To believe that God plans a cosmic salvation in which eventually all
things will be reconciled to God doesn’t mean that ultimately all people
In effect, what the New Testament is saying, then, is that in enduring the
cross, Jesus turned his culture’s weapon of shame against his culture, he
“scorned” or “despised” its shame. (Hebrews 12:2). He refused to be
ashamed of what they wanted him to be ashamed of. Instead, he made
them ashamed of what they ought to have been ashamed of. e cross
calls us to step out of the culture that uses shame to make us conform. We
are to follow Jesus: “Who also suffered outside the city gate to make the
people holy through his own blood. Let us then go to him outside the
camp, bearing the disgrace he bore.” (Hebrews 13:12-13)53
So what remedy is there? Paul explains that through Jesus’ death, Christ
took our sins upon himself to turn aside God’s deserved wrath and
punishment of sinners. To avert that, God would no longer intervene on
humanity’s behalf and let their own wrongdoings fall on their head. As
Jesus hung on the cross of Calvary, it was literally the sin of the world that
was hanging there at that moment of history. Jesus became the sin of the
world. Yet, it was not Jesus who was judged on that cross, but the sin of
humankind that was judged and condemned. What follows is absolutely
central to the gospel’s portrayal of salvation: God loved humans so much
to send Jesus to take humans’ sin upon himself on the cross. Jesus became
sin for us. He took our punishment. He bore vicariously the wrath of God
us, Jesus’ death on the cross brings together God’s wrath and God’s
mercy. It saves individuals from self-destruction and eternal separation
from God and his Shalom. It saves humans from having God eternally
withdraw from humanity and give them over to the clutches of evil and
everything that stands in opposition to God’s empire of Shalom.
Summary
e story we find ourselves in has been hijacked by sin and evil. All of us
are, to some degree, passive participants or even coconspirators in this
hijacking.56 e common view, therefore, asserts that Jesus came to save
us from this evil world which has been hijacked by sin, in order to give
those who accept him as their Lord and Savior tickets into his realm –
heaven. Indeed, many evangelical theories of atonement (i.e. ransom and
substitution theories) concentrate on the individual person’s salvation. In
doing so, they separate salvation from ethics and give Christians little or
no reason to participate in the conquest of evil or to transform the
structures of the cosmos that are governed by these powers.57 e result is
the scandal of worshiping churches, who exercise no transforming impact
on their surrounding communities and nations; of professing Christians
whose sexual practices, business dealings, and political attitudes are no
different from those of non-Christians.58
application journal:
regulatory system or whether he is making reference to the entire “written code” that
regulated all life – both Jewish and Gentile – in the Roman Empire. is study has taken
it to mean the latter, but holding the former would not detract in any way from the
argument presented regarding this Scripture passage.
10 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 132
11 Walter Wink, e Powers at Be, 90
12 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 123
13 Vishal Mangalwadi, Truth and Social Reform, 126
14 Vishal Mangalwadi, Truth and Social Reform, 126
15 Vishal Mangalwadi, Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 37)
16 e Greek word for world—kosmos—can be employed either broadly or narrowly. In
the New Testament both uses occur. We can only understand which usage is correct by
reading a particular text in light of the overall message of scripture. When we consider
the command to hate the world, or when we seek to understand Christ’s words that his
followers are not of the world, we must understand kosmos narrowly to mean the effects
wrought on the creation by the Fall. us, we should hate the effects of the Fall, and as
children of God we are obliged to flee from sin and remain distinct from the fallen
world. If in these passages we read kosmos broadly—as if it meant all of creation—we are
faced with the problem of squaring hatred of the world, as well as separation from it, with
Christ’s command to be salt and light in a world that is sorely in need of both. If we
separate ourselves from the kosmos (broadly construed) because we are not part of the
world, we forfeit the possibility of engaging as salt and light, for being salt and light
requires active participation in the creation. Furthermore, if we take Christ’s use of
kosmos broadly and in so doing retreat from engaging the world, then this implies that
the command to oversee God’s creation, given to man in Genesis 1, has been rescinded.
But there is simply no biblical support for such a position. Christ came to fulfill the law,
not abolish it. Indeed, scripture tells us that, “God so loved the world (kosmos) that he
gave his only Son” ( John 3:16). Here it seems clear that kosmos is intended in the broad
sense—Christ died for all of creation. (Mark T. Mitchell, A eology of Engagement for
the ‘Newest Internationalists’, e Brandywine Review of Faith and International Affairs,
Spring 2003, 16)
17 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 120
18 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 120
19 It is important to note that if we take kosmos to mean all of creation, and at the same
time we take creation to be wholly evil due to the Fall (that is, if we deny creation’s on-
going structural goodness), then we have God loving evil and giving his Son for its
Reconciliation focuses on the conviction that the most basic thing about humans is not
their sin but their restoration. Reconciliation consists in spirited actions, often very
ordinary everyday ones, against the anti-creational forces that violate creation’s integrity
and degrade and destroy (Bruce Bradshaw, Change Across Cultures, 45-46)
30 Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan, 121
31 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
Since sin is not just personal, the whole creation needed to be saved. We see, then, that in
Romans Paul is teaching that there is no dichotomy between the individual and his
corporate environment (whether social or physical). It is all corrupted by sin. And God
has provided for the redemption of it all. (Robert Linthicum, City of God City of Satan,
118)
44 Paragraph based in parts on personal notes taken during a course offered by Robert
notes taken during a course offered by Robert Linthicum entitled “Building a People of
Power”
50 Melba Padilla Maggay, Transforming Society, 25
It is not that ‘faith’ occurs first as an inner existential leap of the individual… and then
God operates a change in him which enables him to love his brethren… ese two
cannot be distinguished. In other words, conversion does not take place in two moves –
first, a conversion to Christ, and then a ‘second conversion’ from Christ to the world.
Both occur in one single act.
51 Vishal Mangalwadi, Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 34
52 Carson, D. A. 1994. New Bible Commentary: 21st century edition. Rev. ed. of: e
new Bible commentary. 3rd ed. / edited by D. Guthrie, J.A. Motyer. 1970. (4th ed.) .
Inter-Varsity Press: Leicester, England; Downers Grove, Ill., USA
53 Vishal Mangalwadi, Corruption and the Culture of the Cross, 35-36
54 ?
55 ?
But conversely, if a person does not personally accept the death of Christ as a means to
his salvation from sin, then s/he cannot be saved; s/he will have to take the full
consequences of sin before a perfectly Holy God. Many people find it hard to accept that
the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross is the only means of finding forgiveness for one’s sin.
But who else ever became sin for the world? In the whole of human history Jesus is the
only one who took human’s sin upon Himself. Indeed, we can ignore the theological
meaning of the cross only at eternal cost to ourselves. e New Testament, consequently,
affirms that the renewal of society begins with the renewal of individuals who pass from
death to life, from unrighteousness to righteousness. e true key to Shalom lies with the
quality of life the people lead. Holistic reform can only happen as a consequence of
repentance.
56 Brian McLaren, e Story We Find Ourselves In, 170
57 Bruce Bradshaw, Change Across Cultures, 122
58 If one reduces the atonement just to Jesus’ death for our sins, one abandons the New
Testament’s understanding of the Gospel of the Kingdom and severs the connection
between the cross and the purpose of Jesus’ disciple-based movement – to restore creation
to its original purpose.
59 Warren, Carter, Matthew and Empire, 79
60 Warren Carter, Matthew and Empire, 81-82
61 Warren, Carter, Matthew and Empire, 79
62 Warren Carter, Matthew and Empire, 81-82
e Roman imperial world does not manifest the gift and blessing of the gods. It
manifests Satan’s reign.
63 Brian McLaren, e Story We Find Ourselves In, 170