Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Dependent Variables
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net Profit Before Tax/total assets
Return on Equity (ROE) = Net Profit Before Tax/Shareholders Equity
Return on Investment (ROI) = Net Profit Before Tax/Investment
Independent Variables
Current Ratio = Current assets/Current Liabilities
Acid Test or Quick Ratio= Current assets-Inventories /Current Liabilities
Liquidity Ratio =Cash + Investment/ Current Liabilities
Period
1991-1992
1992-1993
1993-1994
1994-1995
1995-1996
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
2007-2008
ROA=Retu
rn on
Assets
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.21
0.23
0.19
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.21
2.30
0.17
2.07
0.21
0.20
0.22
0.21
Current
Ratio=Current
Assets/Current
Liabilities
0.15
0.14
0.14
0.15
0.17
0.13
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.15
1.5
0.11
1.38
0.14
0.12
0.13
0.10
Variables
Mean
Standard
deviation
ROA=Return on Assets
18
0.420
0.643
18
1.781
0.497
R (coefficient of correlation)
0.687
R (coefficient of determination)
Radj. (adjusted coefficient of
determination)
0.472
SSR
3.709
0.439
Source
Model
Sum of
squares
DF
Mean square
3.310
3.310
Residuals
16
3.709
0.232
Total
17
7.018
Fisher's
F
14.278
Pr >
F
0.00
2
Model parameters:
Parameter
Standard
deviation
Value
Intercept
Current Ratio=Current Assets/Current
Liabilities
Student's t
Pr > t
2.002
0.434
4.616
0.000
-0.888
0.235
-3.779
0.002
N
ROA=Return on Assets
Mean
Variance
Standard
deviation
18
0.420
0.413
0.643
18
1.781
0.247
0.497
Fisher's F test:
F (observed value)
F (critical value)
1.67
3
2.67
3
DF 1
17
DF 2
Two-tailed p-value
17
0.29
8
Alpha
0.05
Conclusion:
At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of equality of the
variances.
In other words, the inequality (Variance1 <> Variance2) is not significant.
Levene's test:
F (observed value)
F (critical value)
DF 1
DF 2
One-tailed p-value
Alpha
1.085
5.499
1
34
0.305
0.05
Conclusion:
At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of equality of
the variances.
Period
1991-1992
1992-1993
1993-1994
1994-1995
1995-1996
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
ROE=Retu
rn on
Equity
0.51
0.55
0.53
0.60
0.69
0.73
0.87
0.95
1.01
1.07
10.86
0.84
1.04
1.16
1.16
1.38
2007-2008
2008-2009
1.63
1.29
0.38
0.37
Variable
ROE=Return on Equity
18
Mean
1.493
Standard
deviation
2.359
18
0.534
0.217
Goodness of fit
coefficients:
R (coefficient of
correlation)
R (coefficient of
determination)
Radj. (adjusted
coefficient of
determination)
SSR
0.697
0.486
0.454
48.637
Source
Model
Residuals
Total
Model parameters:
DF
1
16
17
Sum of
squares
45.989
48.637
94.627
Mean square
45.989
3.040
Fisher'
sF
15.129
Pr > F
0.001
Parameter
Intercept
Value
5.537
Standar
d
deviatio
n
1.118
Student's t
4.953
Pr > t
0.000
t (observed value)
t (critical value)
DF
Two-tailed p-value
Alpha
1.718
2.032
34
0.095
0.05
Conclusion:
At the level of significance Alpha=0.050 the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis of equality of the means
In other words, the difference between the means is not significant.