DI SPLACEMENT EFFECT OF A THREE-DI MENSI ONAL BOUNDARY LAYER
By hANKLU? ~. MOOEE SUMMARY A method is d.scribed for determining ihe dtiplacawnt SUrjaC.C)oj a known threedimewion.a 1compre&M.e 130undary- lizyer @w in terrm of the mm+w defects a880ciat4d with the projil.tx of the two velocity component.a parallel to the 8-urjace. llu result i-s a generalization of the plane j?mo concept of dti- placement thickne8s introduced in order to o?acribe how a thin bounda~ layer distorts the outer nonmkcoua @w. % tight oj the diq.?uament @ace above the body SW&UX jor$ow abowt a yawed injinite cylinder ia 8hown to be equal to the height characterizing t.lw mm8-- deject of t.lw chordtie velocity projile. The dtiplucemm&suxjace he@ht is 8hown to differ, in general, jrom that a880cia&d with the redtant 7nu$8- @w deject, even at 8tugnation points of the 8econdaw jlo-w. Numerical valw+x are found for the knm threedi nwwi mml boundarylayer @o about a cone at a smali? angle oj atiack to a super80nti stream. INTRODUCTION The boundary l ayer establ i shed i n the fl ow .of a sl i ghtl y vi scous fl ui d about n body i s normal l y consi dered an i sol ated regi on wherei n the effects of vi scosi @ predomi nate and outsjdo of whi ch the moti on of the fl ui d i s governed by the l aws of nonvi scous moti on. I ?or l arge Reynol ds numbem, the boundary l ayer i s assumed to be so thi n that the non- vi scous porti on of the fl ow occurs as though there were no boundary l ayer. Thi s assumpti on i s str i ctl y correct i n the l i mi t of i nfi ni te Reynol ds number. For l arge but fi ni te Reynol ds numbers, the growth of the boundary l ayer causea the stream to be defl ected away horn the body surface. Thi s di spl acement effect of the boundary l ayer on the nonvi scous fl ow may properl y be determi ned bm the behav- i or of the boundary l ayer i tsel f, w establ i shed ei ther by experi ment or by sol uti on of the Prandtl boundary-l ayer I equati ons for kni nar fl ow. I t does not fol l ow, however, that thi s revi sed outer fl ow may properl y be used i n conjuncti on wi th the Prandtl equati ons to yi el d an i mprovement i n the boundary-l ayer cal cul ati on. Such an i mprovement may be obtai ned onl y by use of a new set of equati ons that take i nto account the vari ati on of pressure across the boundaxy l ayer. Thi s vari a- ti on i s negl ected i n the l ?randtl equati ons. (See Al dens i terati ve sol uti on for i ncompressi bl e fl at-pl ate fl ow, ref. 1.) : En-es NAOA T.N %22, ~Lr@ocmnmt Eti Ofa T bree-DhnemIoneJBoundary The customary defi ni ti on of di spl acement thi ckness (ref. 2) i s appl i cabl e to two-di mensi onal fl ow and i s expressed i n the fol l owi ng equati on: J b@L dy=plu(h-&) (1) o where h is some l ocati on wel l outsi de the boundary l ayer (fi g. 1) at whi ch pu=p,w and beyond whi ch the fl ow maybe consi dered nonvi scous. (A l i st of symbol s i s provi ded i n the appendi x.) Under the assumpti on of m extremel y thi n boundary l ayer, hi s so smal l that MWmaybe taken as the eval uati on at the body surface (y= O)of the nonvi scous fl ow obtai ned by negl ecti ng the presence of the boundary l ayei . Equati on (1) equates the actuaJ mass fl ow near the surface wi th the mass fl ow whi ch -woul d be associ ated wi th a non- vi scous fl ow that termi nate at 6* rather than e.ktendi ng to the wal l . . Thus, the nonvi scous porti on of the fl ow behaves as i f i t occurred i n the presence of a sol i d boundary gi ven by the di spl acement thi ckness 6*(z). Equati on (1) maybe sol ved for 6*: *=Jb(-%)dy Ordi nmi l y, theoreti cal boundary-l ayer sol uti ons for pu/ piul asymptoti cal l y approach 1 for l arge val ues of Reynol ds number based on y. Therefore, di spl acement thi ckness i s often defi ned as fol l ows: *=JJ(-%l)dy Tn() h y=s(x) ,-- Body surface X4 - FIGURE 1.Plane boundary-l ayer fl ow. by~, by Fran?dlaK. Nw% K&2. 367 368 EEPORT 112 4NATI ONAL ADVI SORY COMMI TTEE FOR AERONAUTI CS Surface yQhLr,z)-- FIGURE 2.T kuee-&nensi onal bounda@ayer fl ow (Cartesi an coordi nates). For three-di mensi onal boundary-l ayer fl ows, two l ength characteri zi ng mass-fl ow defects may be dei i ned i n ter ms of the proti es ~f the two vel oci ~ components tangenti al to the surface (fi g. 2), . Yl x-%)dy : (,, / Yl l b(-%l )d and i t i s not cl ear whi ch, i f ei ther, defi nes a di spl acement surface that properl y descri bw the extent to whi ch the non- vi scous fl ow i s defl ected by the boundary l ayer. Of coume, i t i s expected that there does exi st a di spl ace- ment surface for such fl ows. The amdysi s that fol l ows shows that such a surface may be descri bed by a defi ni ng equati on more fundamental than equati on (1). The vel oci ty and densi ty profi l es are assumed to be known for the three-di mensi onal fl ows under consi derati on. Cases for whi ch thi s i s true i ncl ude: the l ami nar boundary l ayer on yawed i nfi ni te cyl i nders, tr mted by I ?randtl (ref. 3), R. T. Jones (ref. 4), and Seam (ref. 5); and the l ami nar boundary l ayer on a cone at a smal l angl e of attack to a supersoni c stream (ref. 6). The di spl acement effect of these fl ows wi l l be treated speci i kdl y. The i nvesti gati on was conducted at the NACA Lewi s l aboratory i n February 1952. THEORY DEPINING RELATION FOR DISPL4CEMBNT SORPACE The boti dary-l ayer sol uti on (assumed known) yi el ds a certai n di stri buti on of vel oci ty vb@+ normal to the body &n&ce at the outer edge I i(z,z) of the boundary layer, where p,u, and w may be taken essenti al l y equal to pl ,ul , and WI (see fi g. 2). Under the assumpti on that the nonvi scous fl ow i s al tered onl y sl i ghtl y by di spl acement, the most di rect way to compute thi s efFect woul d be to suppose that the nonvi scous equati ons hol d for y >h (z,z) and to i mpose the fol l owi ng boundary condi ti on on the normal vel oci ty Oofi n. the outer fl ow:. 1 o.~obl (~j z) at Y=h (~, z) (3) Eokeyer, si nce the boundary condi ti ons usual l y encountered i n nonvi scous fl ow speci fy an i mpermenbl o surface, i t i s conveni ent to recast the boundary condi ti on gi ven i n equa- ti on (3) i n answer to the questi on: What i mpermeabl e surface y= A(z,z) woul d defl ect a nonvi scous fl ui d i n such u way as to produce a normal vel oci ty sati sfyi ng condi ti on (3)? Thi s fi cti ti ous surface may be cal l ed the di spl acement surface. Because A(z, z) i s i magi ned to be a stream surface, i t i s necessary to speci fy that at y=A the resul tant vel oci ty vector (u, u, w) be tangent to the surface y=A. Thus, at y=A the rati o of u to the magni tude of g, whi ch i s defi ned ,as the vector (u, w), must be set equal to the sl ope of the surfoce y=A, measured i n the di recti on of the vector ~, or, equi va- l entl y, equal to the component i n the di recti on of ~ of the vector grad A. I n vector notati on, therefore, the normal vel oci ty u whi ch woul d be produced k- a nonvi scous fl ui d at an i mpermeabl e surface y=A i s ~ . grad A. The vector ~ may be obtai ned by eval uati ng the vel oci ty vector of the unrevi sed nonvi scous fl ow at the body surface (v= O), undw the rel ated assumpti ons that the vel oci ty vector vari es onl y sl i ghtl y over di stancea of the order of the actual boundary- l ayer.thi ckness and that the revi si on requi red to take account of di spl acement i s sl i ght. Thus, at y=A (see fi g. 3), The i ncrement i n Ow between A and. h i s appro.si nmtel y (h-A)boti /@; agai n, a thi n boundary l ayer i s assumed and onl y the ti t ter m i n a Tayl ors ser i es i s used. To the order of approxi mati on contempl ated i n thi s anal ysi s, bVO@y.may be obtai ned from the unrevi sed non- vi scous fl ow eval uated at y= O. Tl ms, the fi cti ti ous i m- p&meabl e surface A woul d produce, at y=h, a normal vel oci ty (seel l g. 3) I ntroduci ng thi s resul t i nto the boundary condi ti on gi ven i n equati on (3) yi el ds the dei i ni ng rel ati on for A(x, z) (4) The boundary-l ayer sol uti on yi el ds ~bl . EXPRESSION OF A IN TERMS OF MASS-PLOW DEFECTS The di spl acement surfqce A may be rel ated to tho mrm- fl ow defects (eqs. .(2)), whi ch characteri ze the boundary l ayer, as fol l ows: I n a Carte9i an coordi nate system (fi g, 2), the equati on of conti nui ~ for both ,the boundary-l ayer and nonvi scous fl ow i s (5) Under the Prandti boundary-l ayer assumpti ons, the Cartesi an equati ons of moti on, and hence equati on (5), maybe ~ppl i od i n an orthogonri l curvi l i near coordi nate system i n whi ch the DI SPLACEMENT I WI ?ECT OF A THR31E1-DI MENSI ONAL BOUNDARY LAYER 369 surfaco of the body i s gi ven by y= O,provi ded the radi us of curvature of the body i s everywhere ki rge as compared wi th the boundary-l ayer thi ckness. I ntegrati ng equati on (5) across the boundary l ayer yi el ds --J(%+%)d (P vb2),_h ha s [ , ~ (/m-pu)+% (wmm)]cw or, i nasmuch as h i s outsi de the boundary l ayer where pu=plul and PW=PIW, where d=and & are the mass-fl ow defects defi ned i n equati ons (2), For the nonvi scous fl ow, Vti =O at the body surface (?/=0), and equati on (5) becomes 4%9..0=-(*%) I ntroduci ng equati ons (6) and (7) i nto equati on &[PIUI (AQ]+: [P@I (A%)]=0 (7) (4) yi el ds (8a) I n a Cartesi an coordi nate system, the di spl acement surface i s rel ated to the mass-fl ow defects by equati on (8a). When cases ari se for whi ch other coordi nate systems must be used, the fol l owi ng general i zati on i n vector form of equati on (8a) may be used: iv[QIJhJh (PlgrPg)dY]=o (8b) where y i a the di stance normal to the body surfaceand where the di vergence operator i nvol ves di i l erenti ati on onl y wi th respect to the two coordi nates paral l el to the body s~face. EXAMPLES Pl ane fl ow .Equati on (8a) may be i ntegrated to. yi el d, for pl ane fl ow (a/a2=o), K A=6=+ pl U1 (9) where K i s a constant of i ntegrati on. The appearance of thi s constant means, i n general , that the revi sed boundary condi ti on on the nonvi scous fl ow near the wal l may be ~ppl i ed at any surface i n the boundary-l ayer regi on; for exampl e, al ong the wal l i tsel f. Of course, i f there i s a stagnati on poi nt on the body Where UI vani shes, then Kmust be taken equal to zero and the revi sed boundary condi ti on must be i mposed at the l ocati on A= 6., at l east near the stagnati on poi nt. Yof Egl . gradA + (h-A)(#l ..1 _ l Surface y=h(x,z)--, . ..::, W<:::::.,. Surface Y=ALr,z)- / , -Body surface FIGURE 3.Displacement surface in threedh enmonal fl ow (Cartwi an cooml i natee). Stagnati on poi nt of seconduy fl ow,-l h the verti cal pl ane of symmetry of the fl ow about a body of revol uti on at an angl e of attack, the ci rcumferenti al vel oci ty component vani shes.i n the boundary l ayer as wel l as i n the nonvi scous outar regi on. Such stagnati on of the secondary moti on woul d occur i n a vari ety of cases, i n parti cukx, wherevar an wwnti al l y three-di mensi onal fl ow has a pl ane of symmetry. When wi i s desi gnated as the component of secondary fl ow (ci rcumferenti al vel oci ty for a body of revol uti on) at the outer edge of the boundary l ayer, and equati on (8a) i s wri tten i n the form [ la[l o (lo) & PIuI(A6J +WI & PI(A-+z) +PI(A&) ~= i t i s cl ear that A cannot equal 6=,i n general , even i f both W1 and the boundary-l ayer profi l e of w vani sh, unl ess bw@z al so vani she5. Fl ow about yawed i nfi ni te oyl i nder.-l h the fl ow about a yawed Mni te cyl i nder, there i s a spanwi se boundary-l ayer vel oci ty profi l e and an a,moci abd sp~wi se mass-fl ow defect. (See refi . 3 to 5.) I f z i s taken i n ,the chordwi ee di recti on (fi g. 4), the enti re fl ow depends onl y on z. Thus, deri vati ves wi th respect to the spanwi se coordi nate z vani sh; and, hence, from equati on (8a), the pl ane-fl ow resul t (eq. (9)) appl i es. Accordi ngl y, the spanwi se mass-fl ow defect represented by & does not i nter i nto the determi nati on of the di spl acement surface. ,i / ( \ \ \ \. \ \ \ , ., FIGUBE 4.Coordinate system for yawed fite oylinder. 370 . d ? MO \ REPORT 112 4I ?ATI ON-41J v.v ; \ - ADVI SORY COMMITIEE FOR AERONA~,CS Q 2e . --- FIQURE 5.Cuordi nate system Supersoni c fl ow about cone When the coord.i nati system equati on (8b) becomes \ for cone at angl e of attack. at smal l angl e of attaok. shown i n fi gure 5 i s used, [ 1[ 1 si n O+ PIUIZ (AU +% Pfuh (A&) =0 (11) Because the outer flow is COtiC4 PI, UI, ~d WI W13f~cti o~ onl y of p; and equati on (11) DI ZLY be ~t~ PIU1 ski e~[Z(A-aJ]+;[PIWI(A-ap)]=O (13) I n the case of coni cal outer fl ow, the associ ated boundary- l ayer pr oi i l es shows i mi l ari ty of the Bl asi us type i n meri di onal pl anes (see ref. 7 or 8). Thus, i n a meri di onal pl ane, A, & and 3 are proporti onal to & I &orporati on of thi s i nfor- mati on i nto equati on (13) gi ve9 : PM sin O (H)+% [ 1 PIW1(A8P) =0 (14) For a cone at smal l angl e of attack ~ u, i s nearl y equal to Z, the vel oci ty on the cone surface at zero angl e of attack. The quanti ti es pl , A, 6., and L vw O~Y sl i f$tl Y wi th de of attack, whereas Wl =& si n p (15) where JL depends onl y on the cone vertex angl e and the fl ow Mach number and i s defi ned i n reference 6 as fol l ows: , The quanti ti es Z, Z, md Z m in the not~tion of ref~ence 9J wherei n they are tabul ated. To the i l r st order i n i , the substi tuti on of equati on (16) i nto equati on (14) yi el ds the resul t ; -& A2(ti,-tiJ Cos (0 A=6z+ (16; . The anal ysi s of reference 6 yi el ds the val uea of & and 6P, Cl earl y; A di fl ere from ~. i n the pl ane of symmetry p= 0, r, where the ci rcumferenti al vel oci ty w vani shes. I t mi ght, 30 0 \ / deg in (iiHa=O ]0 ~mv - () ~in~ J* 8xda a.o lp=lr 25 fo 1 / / / / x:{ m+ a 1( + / I .5 . 20 / l I , 1 I r i Ill 1A IJj- I I I I I I I I I I 2 3 4 5 6
Mach number, Afo
FI?UEE 6.Proportionfd rate of incres+e of displacement thiokness with angle of attack on cone. , DI SPLAC13MDNT DFFBCT OF A =DE-DI NDI W310NW BOUNDARY LAYDR 371 however, be noted that i n the pl ane p=~, ~, A=&. F~e 6 shows the proporti onal rate of i ncrease of di spl acement thi cl mess A wi th angl e of attack i n the pl ane of symmetry q=r at zero angl e of attack. The correspondi ng rate of i ncrease of the mass-fl ow defect 6=i s shown for compari son. These curves are obtai ned horn equati on (16) and the resul ts of reference 6. The si ne of the semi vertex angl e i s i ntroduced m a factor pri mari l y to per mi t presentati on of the case 0=0 as the l i mi t of an i ndetermi nate form. l ?or a stream Mach number of 2, the change i n di spl acement thi ck- ness appears to be of the order of 50 percent l arger than the change i n the meri di onal mass-fl ow defect. CONCLUDING REMARKS The foregoi ng anal ysi s deal s onl y wi th the di spl acement effect of a I ui own boundary l ayer on the nonvi scous outer fl ow, and hence can be appl i ed onl y i f the boundary-l ayer . behavi or has been determi ned ei ther theoreti cal l y or experi - mental l y. The l atter approach mi ght possi bl y fi nd appl i - cati on i n the correcti on of nozzl e contxmrsfor boundary-l ayer devel opment. I n thi s connecti on, perhaps, i t shoul d be noted that the anal ysi s i s not r estr i cted to l ami nar fl ows. Lmvrs FLI GHTPROPULSI ONLABO~TORY NATI ONALADVI SOEYCoanrmmm FOR AERONAUTI CS CLI WI WND, OHI O, i kta~Ch6, 1962 APPENDIX-SYMBOLS The fol l owi ng symbol s are used i n thi s report: A2 functi on of cone angl e and Mach number (eq. (15)) lb hei ght above body surface at whi ch p, u, w= PI, UI, wI, and beyond whi ch nonvi scous equati ons appl y (eq. (3)) Al . abeam Mach number fl vel oci ty vector composed of components paral - l el to body surface u, w u vel oci ty component i n x4recti on E meri di onal vel oci ty component at cone at zero angl e of attack v vel oci ty component i n y-di recti on surface of Vbl boundazyl ayer sol uti on for vel oci ty n,ormal to surface, eval uated at outer edge of boundary l ayer Vof nonvi scous sol uti on for vel oci ty normal to surface, eval uated near the surface w vel oci ty component i n z-di recti on I x z } coordi nates i n body surface I I coordi nate normal to surface a angl e of attack A ,hei ght above body of di spl acement surface - 6* di spl acement thi cl mem i n pl ane fl ow 8= l ength characteri zi ng maw-fl ow defect of u-profi l e (eqs. (2) and 02)) 8. l eng& cha&&&i ng rna&fl ow defect of w-prefl e (eq. (12)) . 6P l ength characteri zi ng ma.wfl ow defect of w-profi l e (eq. (12)) 8 semi vertex angl e of cone P densi ~ P angul ar coordi nate (@g. 5) Subscri pt 1 denotes eval uati on of nonvi scous fl ow at body surface, taken equi val ent to condi ti ons at outer edge of boundary l ayer of i nfi ni tesi mal thi ckness: REFERENCES 1. Al den, Henry Leonard: i %cond Approxi mati on to the Lami nar Boundary Layer Fl ow over a Fl at Pl ate. Jour. Math. and Phys., vol . XXVI I , no. 2, Jul y 1948, pp. 91104. 2. Prandtl , L.: The Mechani es of Vi scoue Fl ui ds. Vol . I I I of Aer o- dynami c Theory, di v. G, see. l % W. F. Durand, ad., Jul i us Spri nger (Berl fn), 1943, pp. 80-82. 3. Prandtl , L.: On Boundary Layer e i n Thr ee Di mensi onal Fl ovJ. I bp. & Trans. No. 64, Bri ti sh R. A. E., May 1,1946. 4. Joxq Rober t T.: Effects of %wepbaok on Boundary Layer and Separati on. NACA Rep. 884, 1947. (Supemwdes NACA TN 1402.) 5. Seam, W. R,: The Boundary Layer of Yawed Cyl i ndem. Jour. Aer o. Sci .,vol . 15, no. 1, Jan. 1948, pp. 49-52. 6. Moor e, Frankl i n K.: Lami gar Boundary Layer on a Ci roul ar C!ene i n Supertmni a Fl ow at a Smal l Angl e of Atta&. NACA TN 2521,1951. 7. Moor e, FranMi n K.: .Three-Di mensi onal Compressi bl e Lami nar Boundary-Layer Fl ow. NACA TN 2279,1951. 8. Hayes, Wal l ace D.: The Three-Di mensi onal Boundary Layer. NAVORD Rep. 1313, NOTS 384, U. S. Naval Ordnance Test Stati on (I nyokern), May 9, 1951. @.ur. Ordnance Task As- si gnment NOT&36-Re3d-441-3.) 9. Anon.: Tabl es of Supersoni c Fl ovJ Around Yawi ng Cones. Teoh Rep. No. 3, Dept. El ec: Eng., M. I . T., 1947. . . .