IEEE 802.

16p-11/0014
Project IEEE 802.16 Broadband Wireless Access Working Group <http://ieee802.org/16>
Title IEEE 802.16p Macine !o Macine "M2M# E$alua!ion Me!odolog% &ocu'en! "EM&#
Date
Subitte!
2011-05-24
Source"#$ %ui &ua'g
"(2( E(D E!itor$
E-ail: rui.hua'g )i'tel.co
%e:
*b#tract IEEE 802.16p (achi'e to (achi'e "(2($ E+aluatio' (etho!olog, Docue't
Purpo#e Thi# !ocue't !e-i'e# li'.-le+el a'! #,#te-le+el #iulatio' o!el# a'! a##ociate! paraeter#
that #hall be u#e! i' the e+aluatio' a'! copari#o' o- tech'olog, propo#al# -or IEEE 802.16p
/otice
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or an of its su!groups. It
repre#e't# o'l, the +ie0# o- the participa't# li#te! i' the 1Source"#$2 -iel! abo+e. It i# o--ere! a# a ba#i# -or
!i#cu##io'. It i# 'ot bi'!i'g o' the co'tributor"#$3 0ho re#er+e"#$ the right to a!!3 ae'! or 0ith!ra0 aterial
co'tai'e! herei'.
%elea#e
The co'tributor gra't# a -ree3 irre+ocable lice'#e to the IEEE to i'corporate aterial co'tai'e! i' thi# co'tributio'3
a'! a', o!i-icatio'# thereo-3 i' the creatio' o- a' IEEE Sta'!ar!# publicatio'4 to cop,right i' the IEEE5# 'ae
a', IEEE Sta'!ar!# publicatio' e+e' though it a, i'clu!e portio'# o- thi# co'tributio'4 a'! at the IEEE5# #ole
!i#cretio' to perit other# to repro!uce i' 0hole or i' part the re#ulti'g IEEE Sta'!ar!# publicatio'. The
co'tributor al#o ac.'o0le!ge# a'! accept# that thi# co'tributio' a, be a!e public b, IEEE 802.16.
Pate't
Polic,
The co'tributor i# -ailiar 0ith the IEEE-S* Pate't Polic, a'! Proce!ure#:
6http://#ta'!ar!#.ieee.org/gui!e#/b,la0#/#ect6-7.htl869 a'!
6http://#ta'!ar!#.ieee.org/gui!e#/opa'/#ect6.htl86.:9.
;urther i'-oratio' i# locate! at 6http://#ta'!ar!#.ieee.org/boar!/pat/pat-aterial.htl9 a'!
6http://#ta'!ar!#.ieee.org/boar!/pat9.
1
1
1
2
3
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
Evaluation Methodology for 802.16p
1. Introduction
The objective of this evaluation methodology is to define link-level and system-level simulation
models and associated parameters that shall be used in the evaluation and comparison of technology
proposals for IEEE 82!1"p! #roponents of any technology proposal using this methodology shall
follo$ the evaluation methods defined in this document and report the results using the metrics
defined in this document! The current te%t in this documents for do$nlink and uplink simulation
assumptions are templates that may be e%tended for a complete description!
2. Test Scenarios
The typical testing seneario for 1"p is given in &ig2-1 in $hich only single cell modeling is considered!
;igure1<-1 The t,pcial te#t #ce'ario -or 16p
3. Traffic Models
This section describes traffic models in detail! ' major objective of system simulations is to provide an
operator $ith a vie$ of the ma%imum number of active users that can be supported for a given
service under a specified configuration at a given coverage level!
I'-hoe (2( De+ice# Deplo,e't
(ase (ell
)adius"'#
*u'ber o+
de$ice ,i!in a
o'e
*u'ber o+
o'es ,i!in a
cell
-rban 1<00 10 18116
.ub/urban :000 10 20=12
>oercial ?#age De+ice#
2
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
+
1
11
12
13
1(
1)
1"
1*
18
1+
2
21
22
23
2(
2)
2"
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
(ase (ell
)adius"'#
*u'ber o+
de$ices ,i!in a
cell
-rban 1<00 1:<8:
.ub/urban :000 70=2
The !etail paraeter# -or the#e !eplo,e't o!el# are gi+e i' *ppe'!i@ A.
. Test !ssu"ptions and #ara"eters
The purpose of this section is to outline simulation assumptions that proponents $ill need to provide
in order to facilitate independent assessment of their proposals!
:
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
$eploy"ent% para"eters In&'o"e and (ity (o""ercial M2M
Mi)ed deploy"ent
,arrier &re-uency
2!)./0
1perating 2and$idth
1 3/0 for T44
25 5ite-to-site distance
1!)km 67rban8 3!km 65uburban8
35 mobility -12 km9h
:umber of transmit
antennas of 25
2 63andatory8
( 61ptional8
:umber of receive
antennas of 35
1 63andatory8
2 61ptional8
323 T% po$er T24
25 T% po$er per sector ("d2m
2ase station antenna
height
12!)m
:umber of 25 transmit
antennas per sector
2 63andatory8
( 61ptional8
:umber of 25 receive
antennas per sector
2 63andatory8
( 61ptional8
:umber of sectors 3
'ntenna front-to-back
po$er ratio
3 d2 63andatory8
2 d2 61ptional8
'ntenna spacing
(; 63andatory8
!); 61ptional8
:oise figure
,able loss
:umber of 323 transmit
antennas
1
:umber of 323 receive
antennas
1
323 'ntenna type 1mni in hori0ontal plane
'ntenna gain 6boresight8 2 d2i
'ntenna 3-d2 beam$idth 2
'ntenna front-to-back
po$er ratio
23 d2
'ntenna spacing :9'
'ntenna orientation 'ntenna array broadside pointed to 25 direction
:oise figure ) d2
,able loss 2 d2
Ta!"e #$1 %asic &arameters for 16p
4
1
1
2
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
*. (hannel Models
This section describes the channel models used to model propagation conditions bet$een 25 and
359323 device!
*.1. (hannel Models +ith 'igh Mo,ility
*.1.1. #ath -oss "odel
*.1.2. Shado+ing .actor
*.1.3. Shado+ing .actor
*.1.. (luster&$elay&-ine Models
*.1.*. (hannel Type and /elocity Mi)
*.1.6. $oppler Spectru" for Stationary 0sers
*.1.1. 2eneration of Spatial (hannels
*.2. (hannel Models +ith -o+ Mo,ility
,urrent 82!1"m E34 considers only mobile devices< $e recommend the inclusion of channel
models specific to devices $ith lo$ mobility< such as the 57I-3 and 57I-( channel models!
*.2.1. #ath -oss "odel
*.2.2. Shado+ing .actor
*.2.3. Shado+ing .actor
*.2.. (luster&$elay&-ine Models
*.2.*. (hannel Type and /elocity Mi)
*.2.6. $oppler Spectru" for Stationary 0sers
*.2.1. 2eneration of Spatial (hannels
6. Scheduling
The generic proportional fair scheduler specified in =3> is used for allocation of the resources!
&urthmore<in order to support large volume of 323 devices $ith lo$ po$er transmission< group-
based resource scheduling should be considered< e!g! the '25 can allocate the specific channel
resource to a group of 323 devices to transmit and receive packets!
1. #o+er Manage"ent
The implementation of an idle state is proposed to be used in the IEEE 82!1"m and 1"p broadband
$ireless system to conserve battery po$er of mobile devices $hen a call session is not active! '
<
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
+
1
11
12
13
1(
1)
1"
1*
18
1+
2
21
22
23
2(
2)
2"
2*
28
2+
3
31
32
33
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
mobile device returns to active state $henever re-uired< e!g!< $hen there is incoming data for the said
device! I4?E to ',TI@EA5T'TE transition latency is a key metric to evaluate and compare various
proposals related to I4?E to ',TI@EA5T'TE transition schemes as this latency has direct impact on
application performance e%perienced by a user!

8. #erfor"ance Metrics
(2( #,#te e+aluatio' 'ee! the #oe #peci-ic per-ora'ce etric# regar!i'g to their #pecial reBuire't#3 e.g.
e@tra lo0 po0er co'#uptio'3 a'! large 'uber o- !e+ice# acce##.
8.1. #o+er (onsu"ption Metric
The po0er co'#uptio' etric ca' help the !e#ig'er o- the #ta'!ar! to e+aluate i- a #peci-ic !e#ig' i#
po0er-e--icie't a'! able to eet the reBuiree't o- (2( a# a lo0 po0er !e+ice a'! #olutio'.
The etric# relate! to a+erage! po0er co'#uptio' ca' be !e-i'e! i' the -ollo0i'g 0a,#3
*+erage! po0er co'#uptio' per u#er
*+erage! po0er co'#uptio' at <C perce'tile o- co+erage
The >D; o- a+erage! po0er co'#uptio' per u#er
The a+erage! po0er co'#uptio' ca' be !e-i'e! a#
Dhere .E1FG i# the i'!e@ o- u#er3 jE1F i# the i'!e@ o- pac.et tra'#itte! -or the .th u#er3
i# the tra'#it po0er -or ?H or the recei+i'g po0er co'#uptio' -or DH -or the jth pac.et a'! .th u#er3
i# the tie co'#ui'g -or the jth pac.et a'! .th u#er.
;or #iplicit,3 o'l, the ?H ca' be co'#i!ere!3 becau#e it i# relate! to the tra'#it po0er o- (2(
!e+ice.
8.2. 3anging !ccess #erfor"ance Metrics
The -ollo0i'g etric# #houl! be co'#i!ere! the a'al#i# o- ra'gi'g acce## per-ora'ce -or (2(I8J.
>olli#io' Probabilit,: !e-i'e! a# the ratio bet0ee' the 'uber o- occurre'ce# 0he' t0o or ore !e+ice#
#e'! a i'tial acce## attept u#i'g e@actl, the #ae ra'gi'g co!e a'! the o+erall 'uber o- opportu'itie#
"0ith or 0ithout acce## attept#$ i' the perio!
*cce## Succe## Probabilit,: !e-i'e! a# the probabilit, to #ucce##-ull, coplete the ra'!o acce##
proce!ure 0ithi' the a@iu 'uber o- ra'gi'g co!e tra'#i##io'#.
>o'trol o+erhea! per #ucce##-ul ra'gi'g: !e-i'e! a# the ratio bet0ee' the o+erhea! o- the ra'gi'g co'trol
e##age# -or (2( o'l,3e.g. the !e!icate ra'gi'g re#ource allocatio'3 to the total ra'gi'g acce## pa,loa!.
6
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
+
1
1)
1"
1*
18
1+
2
21
22
23
2(
2)
2"
2*
28
2+
3
31
32
33
3(
3)
3"
3*
38
3+
(
(1
(2
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
!ppendi) 4.M2M $evices $eploy"ent Model
4&1. In&'o"e M2M $evices $eploy"ent
Table A-1 belo0 #ho0# I'-&oe (2( !e+ice tra'--ic paraeter#I4J.
Ta!"e '$1 In$(ome )2) *evices Traffic &arameters
Appliances0
&e$ices
A$erage
Message
1ransac!ion
)a!e0s
A$erage
Message
.i2e
"B%!es#
&a!e )a!e
"b0s#
*u'ber
3er
4o'e
&is!ribu!ion
4o'e
.ecuri!%
.%s!e'
1/600 20 0.2667 1 Poi##o'3
Elderl%
.ensor
&e$ices
1/60 128 17.0667 0.1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
)e+rigera!or 1/:600 :0 0.0667 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
(lo!es
Waser
1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
(lo!es &r%er 1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
&is,aser 1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
5ree2er 1/24K60K60 :0 0.0028 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
.!o$es06$ens 1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
Micro,a$es 1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
(o++ee
Makers
1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
1oas!er 6$ens 1/24K60K60 8 7.407e-04 1 Po##io'/?'i-
or
34E7 !o .M 2.4e-4 =7.6 0.02:4 2 Po##io'/?'i-
or
.'ar! Me!er 1.1e-4 2017 1.77< : Po##io'/?'i-
or
Table A-2 #ho0# the a+erage 'uber o- hoe# 0ithi' a cell i' the !i--ere't #ce'ario#I6J.
Ta!"e '$2 +verage (ome num!ers in a ce""
.cenario Ma8 (ell
)adius"'#
Min (ell
)adius"'#
9A$erage
nu'ber o+
o'es
,i!in cell
"Ma8#
9A$erage
nu'ber o+
o'e
,i!in cell
"Min#
-rban
"*e,
:ork
(i!%#
1000 <00 12077 :021
.ub/ 1<00 1000 104<6 4647
7
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
+
2
IEEE 802.16p-11/0014
urban
"Wasin
g!on
&.(.#
4&2. (ity (o""ercial M2M $evices $eploy"ent
I' table A-: #ho0# cit, coerial (2( !e+ice# tra--ic paraeter#I<JI8J.
Ta!"e '$# ,it ,ommerica" )2) *evices Traffic &arameters
Appliances/
Devices
Average
Message
Transact
ion
Rate/s
Average
Message
Size (Bytes)
Date
Rate
(b/s)
Distribut
ion and
arrival
Credit Machine
in grocery
0.0083 24 0.2667 Poi##o'3
Credit Machine
in shop
5.5556e-
4
24 0.0178 Poi##o'
Roaday Signs 0.0333 1 0.2664 uniform
Tra!c "ights 0.0167 1 1.3360 uniform
Tra!c Sensors 0.0167 1 1.3360 Poi##o'
Movie Rental
Machines
1.1574e-
5
152 1.4814e-3 Poi##o'
I' table A-4 #ho0# the cit, coerial -acitie# !eplo,e'tI6J.
Ta!"e '$- ,it ,ommeria" .acities dep"oment
Scenario
#u$ber
o%
grocery
stores/
$eter
2
#u$ber o%
shops and
restaurant/
$eter
2
#u$ber
o%
roaday
signs/
$eter
2

#u$ber
o% tra!c
lights/
$eter
2
#u$ber
o% tra!c
sensors/
$eter
2
#u$ber o%
Movie
Rental
Machines/
$eter
2
&rban
(#e 'or(
City)
2.0947e-4 0.0022 3.1647e-4 1.503e-5 1.503e-5 6.9823e-5
Sub)
urban
(*ashingt
on D+C+)
2.3122e-5 3.4988e-4 9.4325e-4 1.1442e-4 1.1442e-4 1.1561e-5
8
1
1
2
3
(
)
"
*
8
+
1
11
12
13
1(
2