Presented by Christopher McGregor , Head of Accident/Incident Investigation AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Event description Technical description Certification and Fuel Quality Operational aspects Conclusion Content Page 2 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Event Summary A330-300, Trent 772 Scheduled flight from Surabaya (Indonesia) to Hong Kong, 13/04/2010 During descent, approach and landing the aircraft encountered a loss of thrust control event affecting both engines Engine 1 remained at 70% N1, Engine 2, sub-idle An emergency landing was made at HKG, Aircraft landed at a ground speed of approx 240 knots, conf 1. On landing (bounce), the lower cowling of No. 1engine contacted the runway surface. The aircraft stopped 3,300m beyond threshold, on the runway. During the emergency evacuation there was one serious injury. Subject to a formal investigation led by the Hong Kong CAD Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 3 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Event Summary climb, cruise, top of descent Rome, 21-24 March 2011 EPR Fluctuations observed by the flight crew during climb 01:20 ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT ENG SLOW RESPONSE 01:58 FL340 ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT AVOID RAPID THR CHANGES ENG2 STALL ENG 1 CTL SYS FAULT 05:19 05:30 8000ft ENG 1 STALL, ENG 2 dropped to sub-idle and remained sub-idle for remainder of flight CAS starts to decrease below target 300kts A/THR disconnected TRA2 & TRA1 advanced but no thrust increase TRA1 set to climb notch, N1 increased from 35 to 45% but no decrease when TRA1 was set back to idle 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 4 ALT UTC UTC AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Descent 5500ft 05:36 TRA1 briefly set to MCT, EPR actual increases to 1.30 (N1 75%) and remains stuck at this level. CAS increases above 200kts 05:40 ENG2 re-start attempt but remains sub-idle CONF 1 selected CAS 212 knts TRA1 set to idle CAS stabilises at 220kts Significant sideslip ENG1 multiple stalls Airbrakes fully extended Landing gears extended at 233kts Side-stick nose down inputs CAS 236kts Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 5 ALT UTC AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Touch down Rome, 21-24 March 2011 05:40 CONF 2 selected at 234kts but only CONF 1 reached VFE warning triggered till touchdown Above ILS beam CAS 230 kts -1600ft/min Pitch zero Autobrake armed (low mode) Ground spoilers armed 05:42 500 ft Passing 80ft CAS 241kts (VFE + 35) -1000ft/min 800 ft RH crosswind 20kts Touch down 1,350m from threshold with 5 of right drift angle NLG and RH MLG bounce Nz +0.30g / +1.80g. Max manual braking Full reverse were applied Reverse #1 deployed Reverse #2 remained stowed. The aircraft stopped 3,300m beyond threshold, on the runway. 3300 m 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 6 ALT UTC GPWS triggered TOO LOW TERRAIN AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Event description Technical description Certification and Fuel Quality Operational aspects Conclusion Content Page 7 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Fuel FILTER HMU HP PUMP FOHE LP PUMP FILTER HP PUMP FOHE LP PUMP Fuel from aircraft fuel tank To engine combustor FMGEC (Autothrust) Throttle Lever Angle FADEC Thrust demand Aircraft airspeed Flight mode Main metering valve A330/Trent 700 Fuel Control Page 8 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Contaminants ranged from 5 to 40 microns Typical clearance 7 microns Main metering valve - contaminated Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 9 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Microspheres composition Microsphere composed of salt, water and Super Absorbent Polymer. Presence of Salt is Critical The presence of salt has resulted in a more dense and stable SAP structure in comparison to known SAP migration Dried microsphere with salt on surface Effect of absorbing water Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 10 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Failure to stop refuelling on delta pressure rise: Monitor elements damaged Training procedures not applied Refuelling continued after pressure rise Failure to follow Hydrant re-commissioning procs. Hydrant lines not flushed through fully Salt water contamination left in system Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Fuel Quality Assurance Failures WATER SALT No system for continuing analysis/surveillance No continuous analysis No inspection program No notification of system coming back on line Oversized Hydrant Dispenser Filter Monitors System optimised for 4 to 8 times typical refuel rates Page 11 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. HK CAD Recommendations 7.1 Recommendation 2010-1 The J uanda Surabaya Airport Development Taskforce) should, ......conduct an extensive review of the re-commissioning procedures of hydrant refuel system in accordance with the best practice in aviation fuel industry. 7.2 Recommendation 2010-2 The J uanda Surabaya Airport Development Taskforce should ensure the re-commissioning procedures are completed before resuming the hydrant refuelling operation for Stands No. 1 to 10 at WARR. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 12 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Event description Technical description Certification and Fuel Quality Operational aspects Conclusion Content Page 13 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Engine certification J AR-E E670 Industry standard MIL-E-5007 debris Largely hard particulates Majority 0-5micron Deliberately biased to cover debris size likely to be generated (a/c, pipelines etc) Engine cert defines quantity and size of contaminant to be tested. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 14 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Engine certification Requirements (filtered) 500 hours at 0.5gm/4500lt= 196gm total debris Requirement (unfiltered) Must be able to complete half the longest flight at a rate of 4.5gm/4500lt after filter blockage warning= 31.5gm total debris Nominal engine filter capability 40 microns max capability 10 microns. The filters (engine 1 and 2 did not go into bypass) hence no filter clog indication. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 15 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Fuel Quality Control Industry standards and guidelines exist, SIL28-094, (ASTM D 1655, DEF STAN 91-91) Aviation Fuel Quality Requirements for Jointly Operated Systems (AFQRJOS) International Fuel Quality Pool (IFQP) Standard, Joint Inspection Group (JIG) SAE 6401 Storage, Handling and Distribution of Jet Fuels at Airports (issue imminent), ...etc Rome, 21-24 March 2011 EASA: Part M, subpart C, AMC M.A.301-1c ....consumable fluids, gases, etc. uplifted prior to flight are of the correct specification, free from contamination and correctly recorded. Globally, self regulation has assured fuel quality and development of harmonised international standards 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 16 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Available technology to improve jet fuel quality Rome, 21-24 March 2011 Pressure sensing In line, real time, automatic operation Particle counters In-line full flow design No sampling errors Near-real time information Distinguishes/quantifies both solid particles and free water Automatic operation 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 17 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Way Forward Following Airbus and Operator request, IATA have agreed to take the lead and develop an oversite proposal to ICAO: Workgroups: Supply group: (All aspects from Refinery to Airport Storage) Storage group: (Airport Storage and Hydrant Systems) Provision group: (Vehicles, Pressure control and Into-plane) Proposals to be submitted mid 2011. Engine manufacturers requested to review FMU designs. Airbus have commissioned a laboratory to reproduce microsphere contamination to ensure effective testing of future FMU designs. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Page 18 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Event description Technical description Certification and Fuel Quality Operational aspects Conclusion Content Page 19 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Operational considerations new development Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference ENG 1(2) CTL SYS FAULT AVOID RAPID THRUST CHANGE Or ENG 1(2) SLOW RESPONSE With rapid and continuous EPR fluctuation indications on BOTH ENG Apply the following paper procedure: - A/THR.............................................................................OFF If EPR fluctuations on both engines stop: - ECAM PROC..................................................... APPLY - A/THR..........................................................KEEP OFF If EPR fluctuations on both engines continue: - FUEL CONTAMINATION PROC.......................APPLY Page 20 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Operational considerations new development Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference ENG 1 CTL SYS FAULT ENG 2 CTL SYS FAULT AVOID RAPID THRUST CHANGE Or ENG 1(2) SLOW RESPONSE Apply the following paper procedure: - A/THR.............................................................................OFF - FUEL CONTAMINATION PROC...............................APPLY Page 21 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Operational considerations new development Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference FUEL Contamination procedure (under review) A fuel contamination may result, in the worst case, in a loss of engine thrust control. Aim: Maintaining the thrust on one engine and Minimizing the thrust changes on the other, in order to prevent contaminant from blocking the mechanical devices of engine thrust regulation. LAND ASAP A/THR..................................................................KEEP OFF MAN THR............................................. SET and MAINTAIN Page 22 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Event description Technical description Certification and Fuel Quality Operational aspects Conclusion Content Page 23 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. Conclusions Fuel contamination traced to refuel dispenser On-ground technology available to improve level of protection at point of refuel. IATA Fuel Working Groups formed. Oversight recommendations to ICAO, mid 2011 Manufacturers engaged in further research and development, New operational guidance to assist flight crews Rome, 21-24 March 2011 17th Flight Safety Conference Continue to enforce established fuel quality procedures Page 24 AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS S.A.S. No intellectual property rights are granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof. AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks. Page 25