Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Introduction
Woodrow Wilson, "the father of self-determination," stressed over and again the
strong analogy between religious commitment and patriotism. One's "nation" is the
meaning and legitimacy; the sort of thing that gives final purpose and direction to life.
There are all sorts of ceremonial and ritualistic celebrations associated with national
life. Above all, a nation is supposed to be something one will die for, if need be.1
narrow as being a member of one particular family. Although self-identity may seem
to coincide with a particular human being, identities are actually much wider than
that. They are also collective -- identities extend to countries and ethnic communities,
so that people feel injured when other persons sharing their identity are injured or
killed. Sometimes people are even willing to sacrifice their individual lives to
1
“Religious Nationalism and Human Rights”By David Little.: This paper was originally published by
Gerard F. Powers, Drew Christiansen, SJ, and Robert Hennemeyer (eds.), Peacemaking: Moral and
Policy Challenges for a New World (Washington, DC: U.S. Catholic Conference, 1994), pp. 84-95.
David Alexander 2
example. People who share the same collective identity think of themselves as having
Some identities people have are nested within each other, usually compatibly, as is
the case for geographic identities within a country. For example, one can identify
both with Chia-yi and Taiwan. However, some identities may compete with each
other, as occurs in wars of secession. In the 1950s and 1960s people living in what
was then Yugoslavia felt pride in having stood up to the Soviet Union in 1948 and in
creating a new economic system. Yet in the 1990s, most people in Yugoslavia felt that
their identities as Serbs, Croats, Slovenes, Muslims, or Bosnians were more salient
general, the paper proceeds to present the historical development of Taiwan Identity
and the contemporary crisis of the same. After brief description of some secular
attempts to address the crisis, the role of religion in national identity formation is
touched on the way to specific focus on biblical, theological and ecumenical resources
available to Taiwan’s Christians and churches as the crisis is faced. The paper
Sources of Identity
David Alexander 3
Identities are constructed on the basis of various traits and experiences. Many of
minimal importance. Many people in the United States ascribe great importance to
skin color, claiming that having any African ancestry, even removed by several
2
Kriesberg, Louis. "Identity Issues." Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess.
Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2003
<http://www.beyondintractability.org/m/identity_issues.jsp>.
3
Chen Shui-Bian, “Paving the Way for a Sustainable Taiwan” The Taipei Times, 20 May 2004
David Alexander 4
Taiwanese. This is in contrast to those who come here from China for business,
To most people in the world, the leaf-shaped island situated just 100 miles off
China's south-eastern coast is known as Taiwan. But for the island's residents, the
issue is not that simple. Taiwan's official name is the Republic of China (ROC), and in
the world's sporting, political and economic circles it goes under a variety of awkward
titles. In the World Trade Organisation Taiwan is referred to as the Separate Customs
tournament held in Taiwan, the island's team, despite the fact that it was playing on
The concept of national identity is bitterly contested here. While the struggles to
formulate and sustain a common national identity in other countries are primarily
regarded as domestic affairs, the creation of a Taiwanese national identity has led to
both international tensions and domestic controversies. It all started with the civil war
over ideologies in China, pitting the nationalist against the communist forces, which
ended with the defeat of the nationalist government of the KMT and the
transformation of mainland China into a communist state and society. The People’s
Republic of China views Taiwan as a renegade province after the defeated nationalists
4
“Dancing with the enemy” Jan 13th 2005 From The Economist print edition
5
Taiwan's identity crisis, BBC News Friday, 17 May, 2002
David Alexander 5
escaped to the island. At the same time the KMT government in Taipei, which
continued to lay claim to the whole of China, also regarded the people living in
and a separate independent state. The DPP, that has Taiwanese independence as a
plank within its political platform, attracted enough supporters to win the presidential
elections in 2000 and 2004. China is alarmed and threatens to launch a military attack
should Taiwan declare independence. That this has divided the Taiwanese people
between pro-independence and pro-status quo groups can be seen from recent
national and local elections. Unless there are fundamental changes in Beijing’s
attitude the issue of Taiwan’s national identity will remain contested, particularly as
the development of a separate Taiwanese identity will only become stronger over
time.6
6
“Identity and Ideology” Presented at the Asia Society-The National Intelligence Council 2020
Project. 5-7 May, 2004.
David Alexander 6
Taiwan has not been governed from Beijing since the end of the 19th century
when Japan took control of the island after the Sino-Japanese war. After World War II,
Taiwan's people hoped they might be liberated, but instead they and their land were
placed into a trusteeship under Chiang Kai-shek and his KMT party which was
When the KMT lost the war and fled from China to Taiwan in 1949, the Chiang-led
dictatorship empowered the small minority of newcomers over the island's existing
suppression of local languages and cultures and the actual massacre of thousands in
1947. This was followed by nearly 40 years of government by martial law. Only since
the liberalization that began in 1987 and accelerated in the 1990s have Taiwanese
been free to discuss their history. Taiwanese intellectuals have applied themselves to
7
“One China, One Taiwan” Ellen Bork Weekly Standard December 19, 2005
David Alexander 7
period, the share that called themselves Chinese fell by more than half, to under 10
percent. But losses by the DPP in the December 2005 municipal elections have fanned
speculation that KMT leader and former Taipei mayor Ma Ying-jeou will be a
formidable candidate in the next presidential election, in 2008, tipping Taiwan's China
policy back toward the KMT's traditional reunification position. It is too soon to tell.
Ma's own career owes much to his association with the "new Taiwanese" identity. For
example, at a rally during the 1998 Taipei mayoral campaign (in which Ma beat Chen
Taiwanese that he was a "new Taiwanese," a sure sign that he recognizes the power of
that identity among his constituents. In fact, after his party's recent electoral triumph,
Ma quickly disavowed the notion that his victory reflected "the people's stronger
inclination toward the mainland," adding, "I do not see it that way."8
identities co-exist, and they often don’t even realize they carry multiple identities; 2)
Identification is a process, and people's identification can and does change both
8
Ibid.
David Alexander 8
discovered that even for the most die-hard supporters of unification, there is evidence
showing the development of their Taiwan identity, even though they may not be aware
of it or may try to deny the process; and 4) There is a visible generational gap in terms
between 1945 and 1967) still consider themselves as purely "mainlanders", 42.9% of
younger mainlanders (born between 1967 and 1981) regard themselves as simply
"Taiwanese", even though their definition of "Taiwanese" differs from that offered by
supporters of independence.9
identification, Corcuff has found that an increasing number of them have come to
accept that the formation of a Taiwan polity with separate sovereignty from the PRC
Identity and ethnicity have been sensitive topics in Taiwan, but few studies in
political science deal with this issue in an objective manner and from the perspective
9
“Personal identity in Taiwan is based more on a native Taiwanese/mainlander distinction and how
individuals deal with an increasing degree of "Taiwanese consciousness." One Sunday noon, as I was
leaving the Kaohsiung mosque, I stopped to buy red bean cakes from an elderly woman at the front
door. Her weathered face was broad and solid like many that I have seen in Xi'an or Beijing, and she
spoke with a heavy mainland accent. I asked where she is from. "I'm Taiwanese," she said. "We've been
here for 50 years." I then asked where she was born. "That doesn't matter," she said. "We're Taiwanese
now." I apologized for questioning too much, saying I was only curious since I have lived in China for
two years and traveled to many places. I have also visited mosques in several Chinese cities. Only then
did she come out as a woman from Jiangxi.” Scott Simon
<http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Fac/Adler/Reln270/dokuhebi@hotmail.com>
David Alexander 9
2002, said: "We want to correctly and clearly be able to identify who we are. That
means our name should be Taiwan and not the Republic of China."11 His emphasis on
the nation’s name is but one part of a wider set of criteria suggested by Taiwan’s
10
MING-YEH T. RAWNSLEY , review of Feng he ri nuan. Taiwan Waishengren yu guojia rentong de
zhuanbian by Stéphane Corcuff, China Perspectives No. 53, May - June 2004, p. 80
11
Taiwan's identity crisis, BBC News Friday, 17 May, 2002
12
Cooperation and Symbiosis for a Healthy Taiwan: My Political Ideals Premier Frank Chang-ting
Hsieh www.gio.gov.tw 1 June 2005
David Alexander 1
0
greater feeling of Taiwanese identity has caused the Taiwanese to identify with and
work for a better future for Taiwan. But despite this feeling of commonality, most
Taiwanese do not see a provocative reason for disrupting already precarious relations
with China, especially since Taiwan's de facto status is that of an independent country.
Taiwan's current state, that of an independent nation in reality but not in name, is
frustrating. The thought of reunification with t China, no matter how close the cultural
ties, is an outrage to me. How can a liberal, democratic society join fascist
characteristics? The Taiwanese people don't want to do it. At the same time, how can
Hearkening back to the link between religion and patriotism noted by Woodrow
Wilson quoted in the introduction to this paper, one turns to Taiwan’s Christians and
churches wondering if anything addressing the crisis can be found there. Does the
church have anything to say, and if so, in what idiom should the message be couched?
One link between nationalism and religion has to do with the impulse of the
modern nation to monopolize "the legitimate use of physical force within a given
13
Annie Chen “Identity Crisis”, Columbia Political Review, December 2002
David Alexander 1
1
naturally concerned with the matter of establishing the legitimate use of force. In the
"God" is described, among other things, as the supreme political and legal ruler. As
believed to exercise authority so as to control and punish all unjust and unlawful use
restrain and ultimately to subdue violence. St. Paul's approval of the use of the sword
earthly coercion. And it must not be forgotten that the message of the New Testament
Buddhism as well, which exhibits a strong preference for nonviolence and monastic
universal king, as righteous ruler and embodiment of justice. Moreover, there is in the
David Alexander 1
2
tradition provisional allowance for the use of force by Buddhist kings on their way to
establishing dominance.
So religion can be seen as typically concerned to set ultimate standards for the
use of force and the conduct of political and legal affairs. This is a subject of deep
sacred significance. It lies at the heart of religious belief and practice. It is not hard to
understand why religion would come to play the important role it does in the process
But indicating why religion and nationalism sometimes go together does not
suggest that they always must go together. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Buddhism
are complicated affairs, with all sorts of different themes and counter-themes. The
persuasion, distinctly cut against the violent parochialism and ethnocentrism so often
associated with nationalism. Still, we cannot ignore the reasons for a possible affinity
cultural conception was declining in importance. In the West, this process was heavily
correlated to the Reformation, before which Western religious perceptions were all the
same and unified. But in the new era the homogenous structure was fragmented. Since
14
David Little. op. cit.
David Alexander 1
3
then the Christian world has fragmented and Protestantism has grown. In Anderson’s
identities. The rise of vernacular languages eclipsed the use of Latin, which had long
been the monopoly of the Church as a sacred language. This diminished the
importance of religion in general, and of the church in particular. The void was filled
up by national identity.15
The church must connect all it does to the missio Dei, and articulation of that action
is best done when the church acts out of mandates found in the Bible. But the Bible,
Narratives, codes and metaphors can be found therein to both support and work
Canaan after wandering for forty years in the wilderness, might best be avoided.
Though they may provide metaphors and motifs abundantly useful, they have been
tainted by their use by the Afrikaners who established Apartheid in South Africa.
Following the transfer of colonial control of South Africa from the Netherlands to
Britain in 1814, the descendants of the original European colonists there, by that time
15
Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism
(London, 1983, 1991).
David Alexander 1
4
known as Afrikaners, abandoned the Cape area in 1836. They set out for the
Transvaal region in the north to establish their own republic. This movement north
became known as the "Great Trek." In their minds it "forms the national epic--formal
proof of God's election of the Afrikaner people and His special destiny for them."16 As
They were followed by the British army, like that of Pharaoh, and
everywhere were beset by the unbelieving black “Canaanites” Yet
because God's people acted according to His will, He delivered them
out of the hands of their enemies and gave them their freedom in the
promised land.
Many Afrikaners died during the trek. Others were killed in battles with Africans.
The decisive battle was at Blood River on December 16, 1838. 10,000 Zulu warriors
attacked the trekkers. Over 3,000 Zulus were killed. No Afrikaners died. The
Afrikaners attributed their victory to God's intervention. They said it was a covenant
God made with them. They established their own republic, but continued to be in
conflict with the British over land and minerals. The Afrikaners defeated the British
in 1880-1881 in the first Anglo-Boer War. The second Anglo-Boer War ended with
Afrikanerdom." Old Testament stories, especially from the Exodus and Promised
16
T. Dunbar Moodie, The Rise of Afrikanerdom: Power, Apartheid, and the Afrikaner Civil Religion
(Berkeley: University of California Press,1975), p.3.
David Alexander 1
5
Land traditions, were prominent. They were guiding images for their self-
understanding.17
2) In a similar fashion, the story of the priest Phineas, from Numbers 25, must be
eschewed, not because of any intrinsic value or lack of value in the story itself, but
because of how it has been used and tainted by racists in the USA. A group calling
themselves “Phineas Priests” are right wing White supremacists; most follow the
racist ideology known as Christian Identity. They believe in violence to defend their
interpretation of God's law. They have been involved in numerous bank robberies and
murders, as well as, abortion clinic attacks (bombings and assassinations). They are
violently opposed to abortion (although some think it is fine for non-whites). The
organization at all. There are no meetings, nor membership cards. One does not join
the Priesthood; he is "called" to it. Note the 'he', for women are not allowed to
become Phineas Priests. One becomes a Phineas Priest not by adopting a set of
beliefs, but by taking action, often violent. In other words, a Phineas Priest is by his
very existence required to become a terrorist. The epigrammatic story of the group
describes how an Israelite man "enters into an unlawful union with a woman from
another tribe (the Midianites) and brings down the wrath of Yahweh (God)"upon the
17
Apartheid and the Promised Land Afrikaners and the "Great Trek http://gbgm-
umc.org/umw/joshua/apartheid.html
David Alexander 1
6
Israelites. One outraged tribesman by the name of Phineas kills the race-mixing
couple and thus appeases God. Today’s “Phineas Priests” claim that this action by
provides the justification asserted by Phineas Priests for directing retribution against
One need not despair. Though numerous stories from the scriptures have lost
their appeal because of how they have been used, there remain many that can shed
1: Ruth: Though she was a Moabite, yet after living in the family of Elkanah and
Naomi for many years, she came to identify with them, their land and their faith. This
might be a story for those whose roots are more recently connected to China, and give
2: David and Goliath I Samuel 17:1-51: The little one, confident in something
grander than himself or his opponent, wins victory. Taiwan’s faith in democratic
systems and values can and will over-ride the dominant ideology of China?
3: Athaliah and Joash II Chronicles 22:10- 23:15: The KMT is cast in the role of
the usurper queen and Taiwan Identity in the role of the rescued child Joash who was
raised in secret until he was revealed and Athaliah was overthrown. The story ends
18
Larry Richards, “Domestic Terrorism:Phineas Priests” http://www.jdo.org/pin.htm
David Alexander 1
7
poorly, though. For Joash falls into some of the same sins as Athaliah and is, in turn,
wonderful, loses his mind, and only recovers his position and self when he
acknowledges the supremacy of God. This is a story of hope for the KMT, which, if it
should only come to its senses and acknowledge the need to operate democratically,
might win the support of the people of Taiwan. Like Nebuchadnezzar previous to his
insanity, the KMT does know how to run a country. The absence of an experienced
hand in Taiwan’s administration these past 6 years has not been good for the nation.
But the insane king (the KMT) cannot be trusted until it renounces its pride and bows
to democratic ideals. Nebuchadnezzar did. That is hope for Taiwan and its KMT.
5: The Valley of Dry Bones Ezekiel 37: When the breath of the Lord blows on the
dry bones, they are united, enfleshed, and come to life as a mighty army. There is
hope for Taiwan Identity, which suffers and has become “dry” because of assaults by
KMT ideology for 60 years and the corruption of those who came to power vowing to
uphold it. We need a new breath, from something higher than ourselves.
6: The Prodigal Son Luke 15: After squandering his inheritance in wild living, he
came to himself and returned to his father. After the people of Taiwan have
squandered their inheritance as “Taiwan People” in chasing after China, America and
David Alexander 1
8
Mammon, they may come to themselves and be received again into the bosom of the
Elisha was a powerful prophet in Israel, but his death is reported in II Kings
without fanfare. Unlike his mentor Elijah, who ascended to heaven in a whirlwind,
Elisha dies and is buried, but the contents of verse 21 suggest that he was not defeated
by his death. His bones in death continue to perform what his body did in life.20
When some Israelites went to the graveyard to inter the body of an un-named man
and were surprised by raiding Moabites, they rolled hurriedly rolled back a stone
which covered the entrance to the nearest cave-tomb and placed the dead man’s body
inside. The tomb they carelessly chose chanced to be Elisha’s, and when the body
touched the bones of the prophet, lying there on the tomb floor, the dead man was
restored to life.21 The narrator of II Kings used this story to stress a theme earlier
taken up in I Samuel 2:6, “The Lord kills and brings to life; he brings down to Sheol
19
II Kings 13:20-21
20
Robert L. Cohn, 2 Kings, (Collegeville, Minnesota: The Liturgical Press, 1999) pp. 88-89.
21
The Interpreter’s Bible, vol. III (Nashville: Abingdon, 1954) p 258.
22
Leah Bronner, The Sories of Elijah and Elisha, (Leiden:E. J. Brill, 1968) pp 121-122.
David Alexander 1
9
retreat. Too much faith had been invested in the idea that problems could be solved by
individuals and parties. Those individuals and parties have been found incompetent to
govern and nearly as corrupt as the “pro-China-Identity” forces that they replaced.
The problem is not the idea of Taiwan identity. The problem is the manners by
which the Taiwan Identity has been twisted and utilized in the quest for office, wealth
and power. The blatant racism evident in the 2004 campaigns must be condemned.
The metaphor offered by Elisha’s life-giving bones calls us to the basic foundations of
Taiwan Identity, people who adopt a land and come to be formed and shaped by their
experience here. The “pro-Taiwan-Identity” forces must forsake what threatens to kill
them (the racism, infighting and corruption of the past 15 years) and find again the
animating spirit of the movement which originally gave it power. This is not a call for
retreat, or for reaction, but for re-examination of roots and growth of new
developments based on what is found there. Much the same as the 16th Century
of Christianity based on its Biblical roots, so also does the movement for Taiwan
Identity need to be resurrected based on its original texts and a conviction that this
David Alexander 2
0
land is a gift of God to all who live here. In that way, “Taiwan Identity” as a
movement will “touch the bones of its prophet” and come to life again.
“Identity-shaping requires critical understanding of both the gospel and one’s own
culture.”23 Part of the crisis of Taiwan Identity is that the people of Taiwan have not
well understood the gospel AND we have forgotten or neglected our own cultures. In
process of identity shaping within the context of Taiwan when, in adopting its own
By this confession, the PCT claimed to identify with ALL the inhabitants of the
land, affirming people, not government, as the subject of history.25 The challenges to
the civitas, the polis, and the church itself call for becoming rooted in the land and the
cultures of its peoples so that the gospel can take on local shape and colour, cease to
Identification with the land and the people who dwell here is a difficult struggle
23
Huang Po-ho, “A Theology of Chhut Thau-thin” in From Galilee to Tainan, ATESEA Occasional
Paper No. 15, (Manila: ATESEA, 2005) p. 45.
24
http://www.pct.org.tw/2003faith.html & http://www.pct.org.tw/english/faith.htm
25
Huang Po-ho, Ibid.
David Alexander 2
1
because the peoples of Taiwan have become accustomed to being ruled from outside
taking its direction, if not directly through outside church and mission authorities then
neither be muted nor hushed. They will continue to be part of the wider milieu of faith
in which Taiwan’s churches and Christians live and move and have our being. What
needs to be made constructed available are local forms of being Christian. These local
theological, organizational and artistic motifs for churches in their social, religious
and liturgical lives must arise from the grass-roots of the church.
This is not a call for a “back to the Bible movement.” Church history is rife with
such movements. They create new denominations and further fragmentation. Taiwan
has a surfeit of denominations and divisions. The Bible will play an important role in
the formation of a Christianity that identifies with all the inhabitants of this land, but it
Identity in which the factors of race, gender, physical environment and weakness
comes into play when economics are considered, so one cannot neglect the
proletariat, the peasantry, and those engaged in piscatorial industry nor the retired
soldiers who came from China after the Second World War.
background, are not necessarily devoid of the Spirit of the One True God. God is the
creator of the entire cosmos, the Lord of History. The creation and preservation of
Taiwan is part of God’s creating and preserving activity. God is active and present in
the history and culture of Taiwan. When theological work includes recognition of the
acts of God in history and culture, then it can uncover the redemption of God in all
An Ecumenical Angle
Konrad Raiser, the former General Secretary of the World Council of Churches,
proposes a model based on the Greek word oikos which is as inclusive as can be
managed, “One Household of Life”. Using the framework of relationships rather than
that of history, this paradigm expands the concept of the oikumene to the entire
inhabited earth, not just to all of the CHURCHES on the earth.27 For Raiser,
26
Huang Po-ho, No Longer A Stranger (Tainan: Taiwan Church Press. 199?) Chapter 3, Paragraphs 28-
30 (In Chinese).
27
Konrad Raiser, Ecumenism in Transition, (Geneva: WCC, 1999) Chapter 4.
David Alexander 2
3
ecumenism is a matter of the whole EARTH, not the whole CHURCH. The struggle is
for the unity of humankind, not merely of Christian humans and their churches.
Within this household relationships are formed and the ecology of the earth is
included. Such a model might be useful for Taiwan Identity as well. It must
encompass all inhabitants, and all the inhabited land of Taiwan. It is not just for the
Christians, but for all people, and not just for all people, but for all that lives here. The
result would call for a community of people operating by principles of justice, living
in peace, and committed to the integrity of the created land of Taiwan and all of its
inhabitants.
Christians are a small minority of Taiwan’s people, but we have the potential to be
a creative and powerful minority in constructive ways in our society.28 The inward
directed and the public faces of Taiwan’s churches have manifested concern with
peace” are mottoes found painted on the walls around many churches in rural and
urban Taiwan. Both the mottoes and the walls set the churches off from the
Churches need give up neither belief nor Jesus in order to speak to the issues of
Taiwan Identity. They must, however, tear down the walls and become open spaces,
28
Huang Po-ho, “Christians in Taiwan: Oppressed Majority and Alienated Minority People of God,
Peoples of God”, in From Galilee to Taiwan, op. cit. p. 25.
David Alexander 2
4
like the temples in their neighborhoods. The issues addressed must be those which
impact upon the lives of Taiwan’s people in their multiple personal and public
context.” A church which celebrates its Lord in organizational, liturgical and artistic
forms alienated from the soil upon which its building sits is a church which will not
“Taiwan Christians” need not lose their Christianity, as did the “German
Christians” under Nazi rule in the 1930’s and 1940’s. But, in addition to their being
Christians, Taiwan’s believers must retain and celebrate being people of Taiwan, an
themselves or whose ancestors have come to live here and identify with this land.
“Apartheid and the Promised Land Afrikaners and the ‘Great Trek’” http://gbgm-
umc.org/umw/joshua/apartheid.html
Bork, Ellen. “One China, One Taiwan” Weekly Standard December 19, 2005
Bronner, Leah. The Sories of Elijah and Elisha, (Leiden:E. J. Brill, 1968)
Chen Shui-Bian, “Paving the Way for a Sustainable Taiwan” The Taipei Times, 20
May 2004
Huang Po-ho, From Galilee to Tainan, ATESEA Occasional Paper No. 15, (Manila:
ATESEA, 2005)
Kriesberg, Louis. "Identity Issues." Beyond Intractability. Eds. Guy Burgess and
Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Posted: July 2003 <http://www.beyondintractability.org/m/identity_issues.jsp>.
Little, David “Religious Nationalism and Human Rights” in Peacemaking: Moral and
Policy Challenges for a New World Gerard F. Powers, Drew Christiansen, SJ, and
Robert Hennemeyer (eds.), (Washington, DC: U.S. Catholic Conference, 1994), pp.
84-95.
Moodie, T. Dunbar. The Rise of Afrikanerdom: Power, Apartheid, and the Afrikaner
Civil Religion (Berkeley: University of California Press,1975), p.3.