Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 8

Emergency Towing Procedures

Further to information note IMCA M 10/05 (SEL 11/05, TCPC 08/05), IMCA has
been asked by the lead delegation in the IMO correspondence group dealing with the
emergency towing procedures initiative to comment on the e-mail below and the
following attachments.
No comments were received from members in relation to IMCA M 10/05.
Although a number of members might not consider that their vessels will be affected,
as their vessels will have dual redundancy, it should be borne in mind that their
vessels might be in the position of having to tow a vessel in difficulty. It would
therefore be helpful to have a workable emergency towing system on the vessel that
is to be towed. Members have this opportunity to take part in specifying what
procedures are proposed.
Please send comments to Philip.Wiggs@imca-int.com by 10 October 2005 for
inclusion in an IMCA response.


-----Original Message-----
From: Anneliese Jost
Sent: 23 September 2005 15:05
Subject: DE CG on emergency towing concepts

Dear colleagues,

Obviously it was quite a busy year such that hardly any comments have been
received with regard to my mail of April 19th.

Enclosed please find for your reference an up-dated version of my lists.

I will have to prepare a report for DE 49 to be submitted by November 18th.

Thus may I ask you to provide your comments by October 15th to enable me
to summarise the correspondence in due course?

Kind regards



AB
Information Note


DOCUMENT NUMBER

Marine Division
IMCA M 32/05

Training, Certification & Personnel Competence
IMCA TCPC 18/05

Safety Environment and Legislation
IMCA SEL 33/05



October 2005





Anneliese Jost
Bundesministerium fr Verkehr, Germany

Log in to the IMCA members-only website
to download guidance and information notes,
safety flashes, minutes of meetings and safety
promotional materials and to participate in
discussion forums with your industry colleagues.

https://members.imca-int.com
E-mail: member-information@imca-int.com
DE 48/25 - 34 -


I:\DE\48\25.doc
Completion of the item

13.11 Since work on the item has been completed, the Sub-Committee agreed to invite the
MEPC to delete the item from the Sub-Committees work programme.

14 MANDATORY EMERGENCY TOWING SYSTEMS IN SHIPS OTHER THAN
TANKERS GREATER THAN 20,000 DWT

14.1 The Sub-Committee recalled that DE 47 had noted information provided by Germany
(DE 47/24/1 and DE 47/INF.3) and IMCA (DE 47/24/3) and agreed that the item should be
included in the provisional agenda for this session where the above documents could be
discussed in detail. The delegation of Germany kindly volunteered to submit to this session a
composite proposal for draft amendments to SOLAS regulation II-1/3-4 on Emergency towing
arrangements on tankers, taking into account the comments and proposals made at DE 47.
Interested Members were invited to contribute to the preparation of the proposal.

14.2 The Sub-Committee had for its consideration the following documents:

.1 DE 47/24/1 and DE 48/14 (Germany), proposing draft amendments to SOLAS
regulation II-1/3-4 on Emergency towing arrangements on tankers, in order to
include a requirement for emergency towing procedures on ships other than
tankers with not less than 20,000 dwt and vessels with redundant propulsion
systems, e.g. offshore support vessels;

.2 DE 47/INF.3 (Germany), containing the results of an FSA study by Germany,
showing that the mandatory equipment of all merchant ships with emergency
towing systems (ETS), down to a size of 300 gross tonnage, appears not only
justified by the increased safety potential but also profitable in the long term;

.3 DE 47/24/3 (IMCA), outlining problems in the implementation of the proposed
draft amendments for offshore support vessels; and

.4 DE 48/14/1 (Japan), presenting the results of an FSA study by Japan, showing that
the mandatory application of the requirement for ETS for all types of ships of not
less than 300 gross tonnage has not been proven necessary.

14.3 In the ensuing discussion, there was general agreement that functional requirements, as
proposed by Germany in document DE 48/14, were acceptable, but that no mandatory hardware
requirements for mandatory emergency towing systems should be introduced. It was also agreed
that the text of the proposed draft SOLAS amendments (DE 48/14, annex 1) and the proposed
guidelines for the assessment of deck equipment to be used in emergency towing (DE 48/14,
annex 2) needed further consideration.

14.4 Consequently, the Sub-Committee agreed that the matter should be further considered and
established a correspondence group under the co-ordination of Germany
*
and instructed it to

* Co-ordinator: Dipl.-Ing. Anneliese Jost
Robert-Schuman-Platz 1
53175 Bonn, Germany
Tel: +49 228 300 4632
Fax: +49 228 300 3248/3429
E-mail: Anneliese.Jost@bmvbw.bund.de

- 35 - DE 48/25


I:\DE\48\25.doc
prepare a revised proposal for draft SOLAS amendments and related guidelines for the
assessment of deck equipment to be used in emergency towing, taking into account comments
and proposals made in plenary, and to submit a report to DE 49.

15 REVIEW OF THE OSV GUIDELINES

15.1 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 75, following a proposal by Australia
(MSC 75/22/2) had included, in the work programmes of the FP, COMSAR, NAV, DE
(co-ordinator) and SLF Sub-Committees, a high priority item on Review of the OSV
Guidelines, with three sessions needed to complete the item. The Sub-Committee further noted
that MSC 78, following a request by the SLF Sub-Committee, had transferred the co-ordinating
role for the item from the DE Sub-Committee to the SLF Sub-Committee, on the basis that most
of the provisions in the Guidelines address intact and damage stability matters.

15.2 The Sub-Committee had for its consideration document DE 48/15 (Secretariat), giving
background information on the item and containing the text of the parts of the OSV Guidelines
falling under the responsibility of the Sub-Committee, i.e. section 4 on machinery and electrical
installations and section 6 on life-saving appliances.

15.3 Following discussion, the Sub-Committee agreed to draft amendments to sections 4 and 6
of the OSV Guidelines, as set out in annex 9 and instructed the Secretariat to convey the draft
amendments to the SLF Sub-Committee for co-ordination purposes.

15.4 The Sub-Committee noted information by the observer from IMCA that they had
submitted a request for the inclusion of dynamic positioning (DP) systems in the
OSV Guidelines, to MSC 80 and agreed to keep the item on the work programme, pending a
decision by the Committee with regard to the IMCA request, since this might necessitate further
work by the Sub-Committee.

16 INSPECTION AND SURVEY REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCOMMODATION
LADDERS

16.1 The Sub-Committee noted that MSC 77 had considered a proposal by Canada
(MSC 77/23/1), in view of a number of accidents involving accommodation ladders resulting in
loss of life and injury, to develop amendments to SOLAS regulations I/7 and I/8 to require
inspections of the means of crew access to, and egress from, the ship, such as gangways and
accommodation ladders as part of the survey of the ships equipment. Subsequently, MSC 77
included, in the Sub-Committees work programme, a high priority item on Inspection and
survey requirements for accommodation ladders, with two sessions needed to complete the item.
DE 47 included the item in the provisional agenda for this session with a target completion date
of 2006.

16.2 The Sub-Committee noted that for amendments to SOLAS chapter I, as proposed in the
Canadian document, the explicit amendment procedure (acceptance by two thirds of the SOLAS
Contracting Governments) applies, which could potentially delay the entering into force of any
such amendments substantially and that it would, therefore, be advisable to consider preparing a
relevant new SOLAS regulation which could be placed in another chapter than chapter I,
e.g. chapter II-1 or XI-1.

16.3 In the following discussion, the Sub-Committee agreed that this was not mainly a design
and specification issue, but very much related to maintenance. It was established that a number
of national and international standards, including an ISO standard, addressing the matter, already
1



Amendments to chapter II-1, Regulation 3-4

Emergency towing procedures on ships


Explanation: Comments received so far:
1. Ships other than those specified in paragraph 5 not less than
[500] gt and constructed on or after [DD/MM/YYYY] shall
be equipped such that emergency towing can be arranged
without assistance by crew members. This regulation shall
not apply to ships with redundant propulsion systems, e.g.
offshore support vessels.
Proposed scheme of application:
- new ships
- > [500] gt
- without redundant propulsion
systems

Agreed 500 GT
Dead ship condition is the most difficult
to establish a emergency towing
connection.
2. An emergency towing procedure on board ships, including
an emergency towing analysis which was carried out taking
into account guidelines developed by the Organization
1
,
shall be kept on board for the information of the
Administration and for assisting owners and builders in
planning emergency preparation drills.
Requirement of towing procedure
in accordance with guidelines
Procedures are dependent of the
equipment used on board the vessel.
3. The emergency towing procedure shall be utilized in
communications between salvage operators and ship
officers, if and where necessary.
Use of towing procedure The captain should be familiar with
expressions used in order to establish a
connection.
4. Documented operating and maintenance procedures for the
equipment to be used in emergency towing shall be kept on
board and posted at an appropriate place.
monitoring of maintenance
Tankers of 2000 dwt and above
5. - 8. existing tanker requirement unchanged


1
Refer to guidelines to be developed by the Organization
2





Guidelines for the Assessment of Deck Equipment to be used in Emergency Towing
Preamble
Comments received so far:
These guidelines are to be used when designating deck
equipment for the use in emergency towing events. They are
developed to allow different ship types to make use of any
equipment available on board in such circumstances in lieu
of defining a specific mandatory equipment.
The aim of these guidelines is to develop a systematic
approach for assessment and use of equipment in emergency
towing condition. Upon occurrence of an emergency towing
need, the equipment and relevant particulars may
subsequently be communicated to a salvage operator on
scene to enable use making of dedicated equipment on
board the ship. The guidelines should cover emergency
towing scenarios leading to specifically designed procedures
on board of ships, dedicating equipment for use in
emergency towing and ensuring its maintenance.


A formalised communication contained in these guidelines
3



will be exercised to mediate any details at specific incidents.
These guidelines may also be used by coastal States
exercising emergency preparations.

[criteria to be developed]


Scenarios Also the different situations on board the tugs should be
taken in consideration.
Equipment,
including criteria to be confirmed for a dedication to
emergency towing
Most important is a strongpoint (FS and AS) in order to
fasten the emergency towing line.

Assessment
Checklist for formalized communication between
ship/salvage company

Questionnaire for data available before arriving of the
salvage vessel at the disabled ship.
Se attached document.

Correspondence Group on emergency towing procedures:


Australia

Rob Gehling
Maritime Safety & Environmental
Strategy
Australian Maritime Safety Authority
GPO Box 2181
Canberra City
A.C.T. 2601
Australia

rob.gehling@amsa.gov.au


Cyprus

Christos A. Atalianis
Cypprus High Commission
Maritime Section

93 Park Street
London W1K 7ET

dmslo@tiscali.co.uk


ITALY
Giuseppe Ruzzin
Via Giovanni da Verrazzano 12
16165 Genova

posidonia.ruzzin@posidonia.com


Japan

Koichi Yoshida
National Maritime Research Institute,
Japan (NMRI)
Vice-Principal Research Coordinator
Address:
6-38-1 Shinkawa, Mitaka City,
Tokyo 181-0004, JAPAN

koichiy@nmri.go.jp



Netherlands

Meindert Vink
Netherlands Shipping Inspectorate
+31(0)102668631

Meindert.Vink@ivw.nl



UK

John P Downie
Deputy Head International Liaison
Branch
Bay 2/24, MCA
Maritime and Coastguard Agency
tel 023 8032 9400
fax 023 8032 9364
GTN 1513 400(tel)

John_Downie@mcga.gov.uk


USA

Wayne Lundy
U.S. Coast Guard (G-MSE)
2100 Second Street SW
Washington, DC 20593-0001

WLundy@comdt.uscg.mil



IMCA

Philip Wiggs
Technical Adviser
IMCA, 5 Lower Belgrave Street,
London SW1W 0NR, UK
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7824 5520
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7824 5521

Philip.Wiggs@imca-int.com




Intertanko

Dragos Rauta
801 North Quincy Street, suite 200
Arlington, VA 22203

dragos.rauta@intertanko.com


ISU

Mike Lacey
Special Adviser to ISU
Shaw and Croft
Solicitors
115 Houndsditch
London EC3A 7BR

Mike.Lacey@shawandcroft.com



ICS

David Tongue, Marine Manager.
International Chamber of Shipping.
12 Carthusian Street,
London EC1M 6EZ.

Dir Tlf: +44 (0)20 7417 2862
Fax : +44 (0)20 7417 8872

david.tongue@marisec.org