Frits Coerslaan 48 3571 AR Utrecht Introduction Old and Middle English British English 18 December 2012 610 words
Positive and Negative Forces in Beowulf Beowulf is one of the best known and most studied Old-English poems ever written. Beowulf has its popularity mainly to thank to the themes in the poem, themes that are still relevant today. It is not only the themes though, that make the poem so interesting, it is also the characters. Many of the characters have more depth than you would initially think. Wiglaf and Unferth are examples of such characters; they are usually depicted as positive versus negative. There is more to these characters than just that. Wiglaf and Unferth do not simply represent positive and negative forces in Beowulf. Wiglaf has a small, yet important part in the poem. He is one of the warriors who accompany Beowulf to his fight with the dragon. When the fight does not go well, all the warriors flee except for Wiglaf. Wiglaf is the perfect example of what a good warrior should be like. He is loyal to his lord and willing to lay down his life to protect Beowulf. Wiglaf shows responsibility and a will to protect the fate of the nation. Wiglaf values honour most of all: death is better / for all men than a life of dishonour (290-291). These are all positive characteristics. Wiglaf seems to do everything right and have every quality a warrior should have. Wiglaf, who becomes king after Beowulf, is not able to protect the country after Beowulfs death. It seems that this is because of the warriors cowardice in the dragon-fight. This shows weakness to other nations. However, Wiglaf reprimands the warriors and should be able to lead his people into battle. He also blames it on Beowulfs death: he himself did not know / through what his parting from this world must bring about (3067-3068). Wiglaf does not have the same control over the warriors and the people as Beowulf had. Other nations see this and Wiglaf is doomed. This proves that though Wiglaf is a good man and the odds are against him, his role in this poem is not merely positive. Unferth is a man who belongs to King Hrothgar. He first appears in the poem in the 2
mead hall Heorot when Beowulf arrives. Unferth insults Beowulf. With this he is not hospitable, as he is supposed to be. Beowulfs reply to Unferths insults shows that Unferth boasts without ever having lived up to this. Another code he breaks. Unferth is envious of Beowulf for living up to the boasts he dare not live up to. --for him was the venture of Beowulf, brave seafarer's, a source of great displeasure, because he did not grant that any other man ever glorious deeds the more on middle-earth heeded under the heavens than he himself(501-505) According to the poem Unferth killed his own brothers. This fratricide is a despicable thing to do, since loyalty is very important and Unferth has clearly not been loyal to his family. All these negative traits suggest that Unferth indeed represents negativity in the poem. However, Unferth changes during the poem. When Beowulf sets out to kill Grendels mother, Unferth finally admits that Beowulf is the better man of the two. Unferth even loans Beowulf his beloved sword, Hrunting. This shows that Unferth has grown for the better. He is not just the representation of a negative force. Wiglaf mainly represents a positive force in Beowulf and Unferth mainly represents a negative force. Wiglaf is the ideal warrior, loyal, responsible and has the interest of the nation at heart. In the end he is not able to reign as well as Beowulf though, and the nation falls under his command. Unferth is inhospitable, rude, envious and he has killed his own brothers. He seems to be a negative force. In the end Unferth changes and supports Beowulf and shows that he does gain some positive traits. In conclusion, though Wiglaf is a very good man and for the bigger part a positive force he does have his flaws. Unferth who seems to be a very negative person turns out to have some positive traits.
Works Cited Beowulf. The Norton Anthology of English Literature vol. 1. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2006. 41. Print.
3
VERKLARING: INTELLECTUEEL EIGENDOM De Universiteit Utrecht definieert het verschijnsel plagiaat als volgt: Van plagiaat is sprake bij het in een scriptie of ander werkstuk gegevens of tekstgedeelten van anderen overnemen zonder bronvermelding. Onder plagiaat valt onder meer: het knippen en plakken van tekst van digitale bronnen zoals encyclopedien of digitale tijdschriften zonder aanhalingstekens en verwijzing; het knippen en plakken van teksten van het internet zonder aanhalingstekens en verwijzing; het overnemen van gedrukt materiaal zoals boeken, tijdschriften of encyclopedien zonder aanhalingstekens of verwijzing; het opnemen van een vertaling van bovengenoemde teksten zonder aanhalingstekens en verwijzing; het parafraseren van bovengenoemde teksten zonder verwijzing. Een parafrase mag nooit bestaan uit louter vervangen van enkele woorden door synoniemen; het overnemen van beeld-, geluids- of testmateriaal van anderen zonder verwijzing en zodoende laten doorgaan voor eigen werk; het overnemen van werk van andere studenten en dit laten doorgaan voor eigen werk. Indien dit gebeurt met toestemming van de andere student is de laatste medeplichtig aan plagiaat; ook wanneer in een gezamenlijk werkstuk door een van de auteurs plagiaat wordt gepleegd, zijn de andere auteurs medeplichtig aan plagiaat, indien zij hadden kunnen of moeten weten dat de ander plagiaat pleegde; het indienen van werkstukken die verworven zijn van een commercile instelling (zoals een internetsite met uittreksels of papers) of die tegen betaling door iemand anders zijn geschreven. Ik heb de bovenstaande definitie van het verschijnsel plagiaat zorgvuldig gelezen, en verklaar hierbij dat ik mij in het aangehechte essay / werkstuk niet schuldig heb gemaakt aan plagiaat.