Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
, while in
Al
13
-NO
3
? Fe(2), Al
13
-NO
3
? Fe(5) and Al
13
-NO
3
?
Fe(10) the signal is centered at 12.8 A
)
and lower width at average height (FWHM de 1.2 2h). The
broad signals that characterize the solids modied in the
absence of ultrasound (FWHM between 1.5 and 2.0 2h) are
probably associated with the heterogeneity in the distribu-
tion of pillars in the interlamellar space.
Indeed, the use of ultrasound in the intercalation stage
probably increases the matter transport (exchange of spe-
cies), and improves the dispersion and homogenization of
the suspended solids (by collision effect). These chemical
effects produced by ultrasound are derived from the phe-
nomenon called cavitation, which includes the creation,
expansion and destruction of small bubbles when the liquid
is irradiated with US, locally generating high temperatures
and pressures [10, 35].
As for the H
2
-TPR proles (Fig. 3), the reductibility of
the Fe species in natural clay (6.89% Fe) and modied
clays was analyzed. The calcined natural bentonite evi-
dences three reduction peaks at around 478, 567 and
691 C. The signal at 478 C corresponds to the reduction
of a-Fe
2
O
3
to the Fe
3
O
4
surface iron oxide; the signal at
567 C is associated with the reduction of Fe
3
O
4
to FeO,
and the signal at 691 C is related to the reduction of FeO
to Fe metal [36, 37].
Bentonite modied with Al and AlFe shows the same
three signs of reduction of calcined natural bentonite.
However, the reduction associated with the three events of
maximum hydrogen consumption is achieved at lower
temperatures (around 465, 545 and 673 C), on the grounds
that, as a result of pillaring, the access to the active species
of the material is increased, making it easier to reduce.
Given that the bentonite pillared with the AlFe mixed
system contains a very low amount of Fe (see Table 1), it is
not possible to see signicant changes in the proles of H
2
-
TPR, except for B-AlFe(10) without US where a slight
shoulder at the rst signal appears, probably corresponding
to the reduction of the surface iron oxides.
For the clays modied with AlFe and Al in the presence
of ultrasound, the three signs of reduction appear at slightly
Table 2 Chemical analysis, mass ratios of Si/Al and Si/Fe and cation exchange capacity (CEC) of natural bentonite and modied clays
Sample Si (%) Al (%) Fe (%) Si/Al Si/Fe CEC (meq/100 g) Compensated charge (%)
B-nat 24.91 11.02 6.89 2.26 3.62 46.4
B-Al without US 22.13 13.91 5.16 1.59 4.29 15.4 66.8
B-Al with US 20.47 15.22 5.08 1.35 4.03 10.4 77.6
B-AlFe(2) without US 22.39 14.24 5.71 1.57 3.92 15.4 66.8
B-AlFe(2) with US 22.30 15.00 5.50 1.49 4.05 12.9 72.2
B-AlFe(5) without US 22.08 13.38 5.62 1.65 3.93 17.6 62.1
B-AlFe(5) with US 21.57 13.45 5.39 1.60 4.00 13.9 70.0
B-AlFe(10) without US 22.58 13.87 5.64 1.63 4.00 16.9 63.6
B-AlFe(10) with US 22.38 14.04 5.56 1.59 4.03 13.4 71.1
Effect of Ultrasound on the Structural and Textural Properties of AlFe Pillared Clays 667
1 3
lower temperatures (between 3 and 8 C) than those
observed for clay modied without ultrasound. It is possible
that the use of ultrasound in the stage of intercalation makes
the iron species in the modied clays more accessible.
H
2
-TPR proles were mathematically processed by
Gaussian deconvolution (GRAMS/AI 7.02 Thermo
Galactic program) to semiquantitatively determine the rate
of species associated to each reduction event. The area
ratio for the rst and second reduction signals (A
2
/A
1
) is
practically equal in all of the solids evaluated.
However, when comparing this relationship and the
H
2
-TPR prole of the solids synthesized in this work with
an equivalent solid obtained by the conventional method
(2% clay suspension and a pillaring solution diluted with
10% Fe molar), denoted as B-AlFe(10) conven, it is clear
that there are differences. It is possible to suggest that in
the solids synthesized with and without the use of ultra-
sound, the iron introduced in the clay is preferentially
associated with the alumina pillar (signal 2) and not as iron
oxide (cluster) on the external surface (signal 1).
Since as the rst sign of reduction is associated with the
reduction of surface iron oxides, the B-AlFe(10) conven
solid shows the maximum consumption of hydrogen at a
lower temperature, because all the iron used in the syn-
thesis of the pillaring agent is in contact with the clay, and
iron oxides probably appear on the outer surface of the
solid (cluster) [31].
Adsorption isotherms of clays modied with Al and
AlFe, with and without ultrasound during the intercalation
(Fig. 4), show an increase in the capacity of adsorption
compared with natural bentonite. The isotherm of natural
bentonite is a type II [37, 38], and is an adsorption of a
nonporous or macro-porous solid with a heterogeneous
texture [39], while isotherms of clays modied with Al and
AlFe are type I, characteristic of microporous solids [38].
200 400 600 800 200 400 600 800
A
2
/A
1
=1.05
B-AlFe(10) without US
A
2
/A
1
=1.22
B-AlFe(10) with US
A
2
/A
1
=1.30
B-AlFe(5) without US
A
2
/A
1
=1.32
B-AlFe(5) with US
A
2
/A
1
=1.24
B-AlFe(2) without US
H
2
c
o
m
s
u
p
t
i
o
n
(
a
.
u
)
A
2
/A
1
=1.25
B-AlFe(2) with US
H
2
c
o
m
s
u
p
t
i
o
n
(
a
.
u
)
A
2
/A
1
=1.22
B-Al without US
A
2
/A
1
=1.24
B-Al with US
A
2
/A
1
=1.20
B-nat (calcined)
Temperature (C) Temperature (C)
A
2
/A
1
=0.55
B-AlFe(10) conven
Fig. 3 H
2
-TPR proles of
calcined natural bentonite and
modied clays
4 8 12 16
0
1250
2500
3750
5000
6250
B-AlFe(10) with US d
001
=18.2
B-AlFe(10) without US d
001
=15.2
B-AlFe(5) with US d
001
=18.2
B-AlFe(2) with US d
001
=17.3
B-AlFe(5) without US d
001
=15.7
B-AlFe(2) without US d
001
=15.6
B-Al with US d
001
=17.2
B-Al without US d
001
=16.1
B-nat d
001
=13.8
I
n
t
e
n
s
i
t
y
(
a
.
u
)
2 theta
Fig. 2 XRD of natural bentonite and modied clays
668 N. R. Sanabria et al.
1 3
The surface area was determined by the models of
Langmuir [38] and modied BET [40, 41], and the external
surface area and micropore volume through the t curves (t
statistical thickness between 3.5 and 5.0 A
) using the
HarkinsJura [42] equation (Table 3).
In general, the pillaring process with Al and AlFe leads
to changes in the texture of the solids regarding the starting
clay, greatly increasing the total surface area, microporous
area and micropore volume. The addition of iron in a low
nominal rate in the synthesis (2 and 5% molar) leads to
higher surface area values. B-AlFe(5) with and without US,
shows the highest values of total surface area and micro-
porous surface, with the latter accounting for 74 and 70%
of the total area. These results support the proposal
Marinkovic et al., stipulating that clays modied with the
mixed AlFe system have a higher thermal stability than
those pillared only with Al, generating more microporous
structures [43].
On the other hand, when the nominal iron content is
higher (10% molar), the textural properties of the pillared
clay are very similar to those of clay modied only with
aluminum, indicating that such nominal ratios do not favor
the formation and stability of the pillar.
It is important to emphasize that in all cases the values
of the microporous area and micropore volumes for clays
modied with AlFe and Al in the presence of ultrasound
are superior to those obtained when the intercalation is not
assisted by ultrasound. Such a result conrms the benets
of acoustic radiation during the intercalation stage, since it
promotes the exchange of species, dispersion of the mix-
ture and, therefore, the homogeneous distribution of the
pillars, allowing to obtain solids with excellent textural
characteristics.
The textural properties of bentonite pillared with Al and
AlFe through the conventional methodology (diluted
pillaring solution, clay suspension at 2% and longer syn-
thesis times) are lower [31] than those of the solids
modied in this work, demonstrating the viability of using
concentrated suspensions of clay-pillared agent, as well as
the benets of the use of ultrasound in the intercalation,
achieving a signicant decrease in the volume of water and
in the synthesis time to obtain successfully modied solids.
0
20
40
60
80
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
P/Po
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
P/Po
V
o
l
u
m
e
a
d
s
o
r
b
e
d
(
c
m
3
S
T
P
/
g
)
B-nat
B-Al without US
B-AlFe(2) without US
B-AlFe(5) without US
B-AlFe(10) without US
0
20
40
60
80
V
o
l
u
m
e
a
d
s
o
r
b
e
d
(
c
m
3
S
T
P
/
g
)
B-nat
B-Al with US
B-AlFe(2) with US
B-AlFe(5) with US
B-AlFe(10) with US
Fig. 4 Nitrogen adsorptiondesorption isotherms of natural bentonite and modied clays
Table 3 Textural characterization of natural bentonite and modied clays
Sample S
Langmuir
(m
2
/g) S
BET-Remy
(m
2
/g) S
External
(m
2
/g) S
micropore
(m
2
/g) V
micropore
(cm
3
/g)
B-nat 43.7 43.3 41.6 1.7 0.0006
B-Al without US 60.7 58.6 24.0 34.6 0.0123
B-Al with US 118.7 115.5 36.2 79.3 0.0285
B-AlFe(2) without US 81.1 81.2 28.6 52.6 0.0186
B-AlFe(2) with US 119.7 121.9 28.8 93.1 0.0330
B-AlFe(5) without US 129.6 128.1 38.2 90.0 0.0319
B-AlFe(5) with US 161.5 159.7 33.3 126.4 0.0447
B-AlFe(10) without US 75.7 74.9 27.8 47.1 0.0167
B-AlFe(10) with US 113.9 114.6 25.6 89.0 0.0315
Effect of Ultrasound on the Structural and Textural Properties of AlFe Pillared Clays 669
1 3
3.3 Catalytic Activity in the Oxidative Reaction
of Phenol in an Aqueous Medium
The results of the catalytic reaction of clays pillared with
AlFe show the benecial effect of the introduction of Fe
in the solids, both in the conversion of phenol (Fig. 5) and
in that of the total organic carbon, TOC (Fig. 6). These
solids reach a 100% phenol conversion after 2 h of reac-
tion, while the BAl solid reaches this point after 3 h. The
calcinated B-nat- only reaches 37.8% phenol conversion
after 4 h of reaction.
All pillared clays show conversion values of total
organic carbon much higher than those of natural bentonite.
The TOC conversion percentage for solids modied with
AlFe ranges between 37 and 48%, being higher for the
B-AlFe (5) solids with US and B-AlFe(2) with US.
Comparing the catalytic results of these solids (synthe-
sized in a concentrated medium) with those of the solids
synthesized using the conventional method (2% clay and a
diluted pillaring solution) [25, 3032] signicant differ-
ences in the conversion of phenol and TOC are not found,
especially since the solids in this work contain smaller
amounts of Fe. This last aspect has great advantages, since
the amount of Fe leachate into the reaction is much lower
(between 0.16 and 0.18 ppm of Fe).
In likewise manner, as evidenced in the results of dif-
ferent techniques used for characterization, the use of
ultrasound during the intercalation of clay is desirable, and
it leads to more active and selective materials being
obtained in the phenol oxidative reaction in a diluted
aqueous medium.
4 Conclusions
The synthesis of clays pillared through the mixed AlFe
system in a highly concentrated medium, assisting the
intercalation with ultrasound, allows a considerable
0
20
40
60
80
100
0 60 120 180 240
Time (min)
P
h
e
n
o
l
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
(
%
)
B-nat (calcined)
B-Al without US
B-Al with US
B-AlFe(2) without US
B-AlFe(2) with US
B-AlFe(5) without US
B-AlFe(5) with US
B-AlFe(10) without US
B-AlFe(10) with US
Fig. 5 Phenol conversion of
calcined natural bentonite and
modied clays at 25 C
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0 60 120 180 240
Time (min)
T
O
C
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
(
%
)
B-nat (calcined)
B-Al without US
B-Al with US
B-AlFe(2) without US
B-AlFe(2) with US
B-AlFe(5) without US
B-AlFe(5) with US
B-AlFe(10) without US
B-AlFe(10) with US
Fig. 6 TOC conversion of
calcined natural bentonite and
modied clays at 25 C
670 N. R. Sanabria et al.
1 3
decrease in the volume of water and the synthesis times
compared with the conventional methodology.
The Fe introduced into the clays is preferentially asso-
ciated with the alumina pillars and not with surface Fe
oxides (cluster). This is related to the high stability of the
active phase in the reaction medium.
The addition of small quantities of Fe in the synthesis of
the pillaring agent (2 and 5% molar) favors the formation
of larger and better distributed pillars, which determines
the good catalytic performance of these solids in the oxi-
dative reaction of phenol in a diluted aqueous medium.
Sonication favors the formation of larger and better-
distributed pillars, generating very microporous structures
that are active and selective in the reaction of phenol
oxidation.
Acknowledgments The authors are grateful for the nancial sup-
port offered by projects DIB (code 202010012015, and
202010012019) of Universidad Nacional de Colombia Sede Bogota.
References
1. Barrer RM, MacLeod DM (1955) Trans Faraday Soc 51:1290
2. Schoonheydt RA, Pinnavaia T, Lagaly G, Gangas N (1999) Pure
Appl Chem 71:2367
3. Bergaya F, Aouad A, Mandalia T (2006) In: Bergaya F, Theng
BKG, Lagaly L (eds) Handbook of clay science, vol 1. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, ch. 7.5
4. Fetter G, Heredia G, Velazquez LA, Maubert AM, Bosch P
(1997) Appl Catal A 162:41
5. Diano W, Rubino R, Sergio M (1994) Microporous Mater 2:179
6. Salerno P, Mendioroz S (2002) Appl Clay Sci 22:115
7. Molina R, Moreno S, Poncelet G (2000) Stud Surf Sci Catal
130:983
8. Sanchez A, Montes M (1988) Microporous Mesoporous Mater
21:117
9. Storaro L, Lenarda M, Perissinotto M, Lucchini V, Ganzeria R
(1998) Microporous Mesoporous Mater 20:317
10. Katdare SP, Ramaswamy V, Ramaswamy AV (1999) Catal
Today 49:313
11. Perez A, Centeno MA, Odriozola JA, Molina R, Moreno S (2008)
Catal Today 133135:526
12. Katdare SP, Ramaswamy V, Ramaswamy AV (2000) Micropo-
rous Mesoporous Mater 37:329
13. Singh V, Sapehiyia V, Kad GL (2004) J Mol Catal A Chem
210:119
14. Fetter G, Hernandez V, Rodriguez V, Valenzuela MA, Lara VH,
Bosch P (2003) Mater Lett 57:1220
15. de Andres AM, Merino J, Galvan JC, Ruiz-Hitzky E (1999)
Mater Res Bull 34:641
16. Aouad A, Mandalia T, Bergaya F (2005) Appl Clay Sci 28:175
17. Barrault J, Abdellaoui M, Bouchoule C, Majeste A, Tatibouet
JM, Louloudi A, Papayannakos N, Gangas NH (2000) Appl Catal
B 27:L225
18. Lee WY, Raythatha RH, Tatarchuk BJ (1989) J Catal 115:159
19. Bergaya F, Hassoun N, Gatineau L, Barrault J (1991) Stud Surf
Sci Catal 63:329
20. Carriazo JG, Guelou E, Barrault J, Tatibouet JM, Moreno S
(2003) Appl Clay Sci 22:303
21. Guelou E, Barrault J, Fournier J, Tatibouet JM (2003) Appl Catal
B 44:1
22. Ksontini N, Najjar W, Ghorbel A (2008) J Phys Chem Solids
69:1112
23. Palinko I, Molnar A, Nagy JB, Bertrand JC, Lazar L, Valyon J,
Kiricsi I (1997) J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 8:1591
24. Palinko I, Lazar K, Kiricsi I (1997) J Mol Struct 410411:547
25. Carriazo J, Guelou E, Barrault J, Tatibouet JM, Molina R, Mo-
reno S (2005) Catal Today 107108:126
26. Barrault J, Tatibouet JM, Papayannakos N (2000) C R Acad Sci
Paris Serie IIc Chem 3:777
27. Furrer G, Ludwig C, Schindler PW (1992) J Colloid Interface Sci
149:56
28. Sanabria N, A