Sheet1

Date Posted Docket #/

File Format
Description
Date initiated Type of case Decision Self represented appellant
07/09/14 H039428
[PDF] [DOC]
Gillespie v.
Svale del
Grande
4/17/14 CA6
Case Details
03/15/13 civil trial court order denying arbitration reversed no
06/25/14 G047358
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Vargas
4/11/14 CA4/3
Case Details
08/31/12 cr affirm no
06/25/14 F066645
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Nasser
3/10/14 CA5
Case Details
01/07/13 cr affirm no
06/25/14 B245901
[PDF] [DOC]
Ybarra v.
Apartment
Inv. &
Management
Co. 3/13/14
CA2/2 Case
Details
12/19/12 civil Order denying motion to compel arbitration reversed no
Page 1
Sheet1
06/25/14 A135553
[PDF] [DOC]
Cheroti v.
Harvey &
Madding
4/10/14 CA1/1
Case Details
05/25/12 civil Order denying motion to compel arbitration reversed no
06/19/14 B243204
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Prado
3/6/14 CA2/5
Case Details
01/12/12 cr Affirm in part, reverse in part, remanded no
05/21/14 G048951
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Lara
3/4/14 CA4/3
Case Details
01/12/12 cr Affirm no
05/15/14 H038508
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Espinoza
1/31/14 CA6
Case Details
06/29/12 cr Reversed and remanded no
Page 2
Sheet1
04/30/14 C063037
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Uy
12/31/13 CA3
Case Details
09/21/09 cr affirm as modified as to one defendant, reverse convictions second defendant no
04/09/14 B239519
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Hubbard
12/31/13
CA2/1 Case
Details
02/23/12 cr All convictions reversed, court directed to dismiss charges no
03/26/14 H039330
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Moran
12/16/13 CA6
Case Details
02/15/13 cr We strike the probation condition requiring appellant to not enter the premises or adjacent parking lot of any home depot store in California. no
Page 3
Sheet1
03/26/14 H037246
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Miller
12/20/13 CA6
Case Details
08/12/11 cr Affirm no
03/19/14 D063945
[PDF] [DOC]
So. Coast
Framing v.
WCAB
12/9/13 CA4/1
Case Details
05/24/13 civil workers comp order annulled no
03/12/14 B253237
[PDF] [DOC]
In re Murray
12/23/13
CA2/8 Case
Details
09/25/13 cr habeas corpus granted judgment reversed as to resentencing no
Page 4
Sheet1
03/12/14 B244602
[PDF] [DOC]
In re Mark R.
12/16/13
CA2/7 Case
Details
10/15/12 juvenile delinquency affirm, reverse second restitution no
02/26/14 G046736
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Vega
12/23/13
CA4/3 Case
Details
04/03/12 cr reversed for resentencig no
Page 5
Sheet1
01/29/14 G046681
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Brambila
10/31/13
CA4/3 Case
Details
03/23/12 cr Affirm no
01/22/14 E054970
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Zarate
11/5/13 CA4/2
Case Details
11/15/11 cr affirm, sentence vacated, remanded for resentencig no
Page 6
Sheet1
01/22/14 B229255
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Stratis
10/21/13
CA2/5 Case
Details
12/01/10 cr life sentence without possibility of parole reversed, remanded for resenting no
01/15/14 A135892
[PDF] [DOC]
Friends
College San
Mateo v. San
Mateo Co.
9/26/13 CA1/1
Case Details
07/02/12 civil Affirm no
12/18/13 G047080
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Mallett
10/1/13 CA4/3
Case Details
04/19/12 cr remanded for resentencing no
Page 7
Sheet1
12/11/13 G047277
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Zapata
9/20/13 CA4/3
Case Details
08/14/12 cr Affirm in part, reverse in part, remanded no
Page 8
Sheet1
12/11/13 B236152
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Banks
8/28/13 CA2/2
Case Details
09/22/11 cr affirm with modifications no
11/26/13 H038316
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Trujillo
8/22/13 CA6
Case Details
05/11/12 cr Judgment order of probation is reversed remanded no
Page 9
Sheet1
11/26/13 E056160
[PDF] [DOC]
Gonzalez v.
Metro Nissan
of Redlands
9/12/13 CA4/2
Case Details
04/27/12 civil reversed, remanded to grant defendants motion to compel arbitration no
11/13/13 E054516
[PDF] [DOC]
B. H. v. Co. of
San
Bernardino
7/25/13 CA4/2
Case Details
09/08/11 civil Affirm, Summary judgment granted on immunity claims no
Page 10
Sheet1
10/16/13 B235766
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Adderly
6/26/13 CA2/3
Case Details
09/02/11 cr Habeas corpus petition denied no
10/16/13 A136960
[PDF] [DOC]
In re Pulido
7/15/13 CA1/1
Case Details
10/30/12 cr habeas corpus petition granted, sentence vacated remanded for resentencing no
10/03/13 B232880
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Martinez
4/15/13 CA2/6
Case Details
04/28/11 cr Affirm no
Page 11
Sheet1
10/03/13 A135206
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Broyles
7/29/13 CA1/2
Case Details
04/02/12 cr Affirm no
09/26/13 A128197
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v.
Blackwell
6/20/13 CA1/5
Case Details
04/08/10 cr sentence vacated, remanded for resentencing no
09/19/13 B233833
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Cortez
5/30/13 CA2/8
Case Details
06/15/11 cr conviction reversed for one defendant, affirm defendant no
08/29/13 B235015
[PDF] [DOC]
Tract 19051
HOA v. Kemp
5/15/13 CA2/4
Case Details
03/02/12 civil attorney fees reversed no
Page 12
Sheet1
08/21/13 B224505A
[PDF] [DOC]
P. v. Mauricio
5/30/13 CA2/8
Case Details
05/11/10 cr sentence reversed, remanded for resentencing no
Page 13
Sheet1
Name of JusticeSupreme Court Review petition initiated Supreme Court Review granted Votes ordering review
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN 05/19/14
07/09/2014 deferred
until another case
resolved Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Ikola 05/22/14
6/25/2014: The
petition for review is
granted, and the above-
entitled matter is
transferred to the
Court of Appeal,
Fourth Appellate
District, Division
Three, with directions
to vacate its decision
and to reconsider the
validity of the
enhancement imposed
in this case under
Penal Code section
667, subdivision
(a)(1). (Cal. Rules of
Court, rule 8.528(d);
see People v. West
(1984) 154
Cal.App.3d 100, 107-
108; People v. Smith
(2003) 110
Cal.App.4th 1072,
1080, fn. 10.)
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Kane 04/22/14 06/25/14
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Ashman-Gerst 04/22/14 6/25/2014 The petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation of Los Angeles, S204032 (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 14
Sheet1
Margulies 05/21/14
6/25/2014 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of a
related issue in
Sanchez v. Valencia
Holding Company,
LLC, S199119
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Thompson 04/07/14 6/18/2014 The petitions for review are granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending the finality of our disposition of a related issue in People v. Chiu, S202724 (filed on June 2, 2014) - Cal.4th
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
THOMPSON 04/14/14 5/21/2014 The petition for review of defendant David Gonzales Lara is denied. The People's petition for review is granted. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in People v. Conley, S211275
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN Grover concurring and dissenting 03/07/14
05/14/2014
Respondent's petition
for review is granted.
Further action in this
matter is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of a
related issue in In re
Alatriste, S214652
and In re Bonilla,
S214960
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 15
Sheet1
Mauro 02/03/14
04/30/2014 Defendant
Uy's petition for
review is granted, and
further action in his
case is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Gutierrez and
Moffett,
S206365/S206771
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)) or
pending further order
of the court.
CANTIL-
SAKAUYE,
C.J.,
BAXTER,
A.J.,
WERDEGAR,
A.J., CHIN,
A.J.,
CORRIGAN,
A.J., LIU, A.J.
(Received
05/02/14)
ROTHSCHILD 02/11/14 04/09/14
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
ELIA, 01/16/14 03/26/14
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 16
Sheet1
Premo, J
Untimely
petition for
review
02/04/2014
03/26/2014 The court
having been advised
that defendant Todd
Russell Miller died on
January 20, 2014, the
petition for review is
granted and the cause
is transferred to the
Court of Appeal,
Sixth Appellate
District, with
directions to enter an
order in Case No.
H037246 permanently
abating all
proceedings with
respect to defendant
upon verification of
the death and to
require the Superior
Court for Santa Clara
County to enter an
order to that effect in
Case No. C1081125.
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
MCINTYRE 01/24/14 03/19/14
RUBIN 01/30/14
03/12/2014 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending our
decisions in People v.
Moffett, S206771,
and People v.
Gutierrez, S206365
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ
Page 17
Sheet1
PERLUSS 01/23/14
03/12/2014 The
People's petition for
review is granted.
Further action in this
matter is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of a
related issue in Luis
M. v. Superior Court,
S207314 (see Cal.
Rules of Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court.
Appellant's petition
for review is denied
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Aronson 01/23/14
02/26/2014 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Conley, S211275
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court.
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 18
Sheet1
Rylaarsdam 12/11/13
01/29/2014 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Centeno, S209957,
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court. Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Hollenhurst, Miller concurring and dissenting 12/09/13
01/21/2014 The
People's petition for
review is granted.
Further action in this
matter is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Conley, S211275
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court.
Defendant's petition
for review is denied.
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 19
Sheet1
Kumar, Turner and Mosk concurring and dissenting 11/20/13
01/21/2014 The
People's petition
01/21/2014 People's
petition for review
and defendant
Christopher Stratis's
petition for review are
both granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of related
issues in People v.
Moffett, S206771,
People v. Gutierrez,
S206365, and People
v. Banks, S213819
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Sepulveda 11/05/13 01/15/14
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Moore 11/13/13
12/18/2013 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Conley, S211275
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ
Page 20
Sheet1
Rylaarsdam 10/22/13
12/11/2013 The
People's petition for
review is granted.
Further action in this
matter is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of a
related issue in People
v. Conley, S211275
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court.
Defendant's petition
for review is denied. Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 21
Sheet1
Ferns 10/07/13
12/11/2013 Petitioner
Matthews' petition for
review is granted.
Review is confined to
the following issues:
Was the evidence
sufficient to establish
that Matthews was a
"major participant"
within the meaning of
Penal Code section
190.2, subdivision
(d)? Does the true
finding on the special
circumstance violate
due process? (U.S.
Const., 5th & 14th
Amends.; Cal. Const.,
art. I, 7, 15;
Enmund v. Florida
(1982) 458 U.S. 782.)
Petitioner Banks'
petition for review is
denied. Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Elia 09/30/13 11/26/13
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ
Page 22
Sheet1
Richli 10/22/13
11/26/2013 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending
consideration and
disposition of a
related issue in
Sanchez v. Valencia
Holding Co., S199119
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court. Votes:
Cantil-Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard, Baxter,
Werdegar, Chin,
Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Ramirez 08/30/13 11/13/13
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Page 23
Sheet1
Klein
08/02/2013
defendant and
appellant
08/05/2013
people and
respondent
10/16/2013 The
People's petition for
review is granted.
Further action in this
matter is deferred
pending consideration
and disposition of
related issues in
People v. Gutierrez,
S206365, and People
v. Moffett, S206771
(see Cal. Rules of
Court, rule
8.512(d)(2)), or
pending further order
of the court.
Submission of
additional briefing,
pursuant to California
Rules of Court, rule
8.520, is deferred
pending further order
of the court.
Defendant's petition
for review is denied. Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ
Dondero ############
10/16/2013 The
petition for review is
granted. Further
action in this matter is
deferred pending our
decisions in People v.
Moffett, S206771,
and People v.
Gutierrez, S206365
Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ
Perren
10/02/2013 The
petition for review is
granted. The matter is
transferred to the
Court of Appeal,
Second Appellate
District, Division Six,
with directions to
recall its remittitur in
People v. Martinez,
B232880, and to refile
its opinion in that
case.
Page 24
Sheet1
Richman 09/09/13
10/02/2013 The
petition for review is
granted. The matter is
transferred to the
Court of Appeal, First
Appellate District,
Division Two, to
permit it to reconcile
its opinion with the
abstract of judgment
and the minute order
of sentencing,
including the
imposition of any
mandatory
enhancement under
Penal Code section
667, subdivision
(a)(1)
Votes: Cantil-
Sakauye, C.J.,
Kennard,
Baxter,
Werdegar,
Chin, Corrigan
and Liu, JJ.
Needham
03/16/2012 Petition
for review denied
01/09/2013
SCOTUS
dated Jan. 7,
2013 - "The
motion of
petitioner for
leave to
proceed in
forma pauperis
and the
petition for a
writ of
certiorari are
granted.
02/26/2013
The Supreme
Court of the
United States
has granted
defendant's
petition for
writ of
certiorari,
Flier, Grimes dissenting
07/09/2013
defendant and
appellant
07/10/2013
people and
respondent
The People's petition
for review is granted.
Appellant Bernal's
petition for review is
denied. Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
SUZUKAWA, 06/25/13 8/28/2013 The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Is a prevailing homeowner entitled to attorney fees under Civil Code section 1354 in an action by the homeowners association to enforce its governing documents as those of a common interest development when the homeowner prevailed because it was later determined that the subdivision was not such a development and its governing documents had not been properly reenacted? Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 25
Sheet1
Bigelow
02/29/2012 Review
denied 12/4/2012 On
October 29, 2012, the
United States
Supreme Court
vacated this court's
opinion filed on
November 28, 2011.
Therefore, the
remittitur issued on
March 7, 2012, IT IS
HEREBY ORDER
RECALLED.
8/21/2013 Petition for
review granted in
Supreme Court.
7/14/2014 The above-
entitled matter is
transferred to the
Court of Appeal,
Second Appellate
District, Division
Eight, with the
directions to vacate its
decision and to
reconsider the cause
in light of People v.
Gutierrez (2014) 58
Cal.4th 1354.
Page 26
Sheet1
Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 27
Sheet1
Page 28
Sheet1
Page 29
Sheet1
Page 30
Sheet1
Page 31
Sheet1
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 32
Sheet1
Page 33
Sheet1
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 34
Sheet1
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 35
Sheet1
Page 36
Sheet1
Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ
Page 37
Sheet1
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Corrigan and Liu, JJ.
Page 38