7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith

http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 1/6
Home
Q & A
Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence
#328
July 29, 2013
Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence
Dr. Craig, I am a long timer viewer, my wife and I personally enjoy your On Guard book and my kids
enjoy the What is God Like series. My question is one born from frustration dealing with a particular
atheist colleague of mine. I definitely affects others around me, including myself, and I can't find
anything in your books or website to help address this regarding the probably of God existing equals
zero.
He says that When you want to find out the probability of an event happening, you simple divide the
event by the total of all events. A simple example of this is the probability of rolling a 1 on a six-sided
die, which would be 1 (the event you want) divided by 6 (all possible events). So when you want to
know the probability that god exists, you simple divide the one you choose by all possible other events.
Since you have no proof that indicate any one god is more likely than any other god, this gives you an
infinite number of possible events. So doing the probability you get 1 divided by infinity which is
zero." When questioned that infinity is the incorrect constant to use he replied with, Ok, why isn't
infinity the right number to use? Do you have some proof for a specific god that nobody seems to know
about? If you don't, then how is any other god not just as likely? This isn't rocket science, it's basic
logic. Since I don't have to prove they exist, I can make up new gods all day long. When something is
unprovable it has a infinite set of like instances by default. Again, that's basic logic.
Jason
United States
While your question raises some technical issues in probability theory, to which Ill return at the end of
this answer, in all candor, Jason, given your familiarity with On Guard and other resources, answering
this question should have been easy for you! Look at p. 161 of On Guard:
Probabilities are always relative to some background information. . . . Now the atheist says Gods
existence is improbable. You should immediately ask, Improbable relative to what? What is the
background information? . . . The interesting question is whether Gods existence is probable relative to
the full scope of the evidence.
Had you asked that question of your friend, it would have been evident that he is considering no
background information at all! He seems to be talking about a sort of absolute probability of Gods
existence Pr (G) in abstraction from any background information B and specific evidence E. Thats a
pointless exercise. He seems to be imagining all the possible deities that could exist and asking, What
are the chances apriori that a certain one of these exists? How silly! Thats like inquiring about the
absolute probability that a certain person, for example, you, exists, given the infinite number of
possible persons there could be. Nobody is interested in such absolute probabilities, if there even are
such things. What we want to know, rather, is the probability of your existence or Gods existence
7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 2/6
relative to our background information and specific evidence: Pr (G|E & B).
Now in On Guard I give you four independent arguments for Gods existence that go to show that Pr
(G|E & B) >> 0.5. Thus, you should categorically reject your friends assertion that you have no proof
that indicate any one god is more likely than any other god. (How could you have missed this, Jason?
Thats what these arguments are for!) When he demands, Do you have some proof for a
specific god. . . ?, you should reply, Yes, I have evidence relative to which Gods existence is quite
probable. Then he has to deal with your arguments. He can no longer appeal to his apriori probability,
in the same way that someone denying your existence has to deal with the evidence of your existence.
That launches a discussion of the theistic arguments, which is exactly where you want to be!
As for the technical issues, when your friend asserts, If you don't [have evidence of Gods existence],
then how is any other god not just as likely? This isn't rocket science, it's basic logic, hes
presupposing a theory of logical probability which is highly controverted and is rejected by almost all
probability theorists today. I ran into this question in preparation for my last debate with Michael
Tooley several years ago. I consulted Timothy McGrew, Professor of Philosophy at Western Michigan,
who writes on probability theory. Tim explained to me that most theorists would deny that in the
absence of evidence the probability of Gods existence is to be computed as your friend suggests.
It is correct that in the complete absence of evidence there is a sort of symmetry of ignorance about
competing views. Wed have no idea which is true. But your friend interprets this to mean that the
competing options are all equally probable. And thats false. To see why, consider an illustration
provided by the mathematician Peter Walley of a closed bag of colored marbles. If you reach in and
draw a marble, what is the probability that the marble will be red? Walley says,
A nave answer is to say that, because there are two possible outcomes (red or non-red) and no
information to favour either, the probability must be 1/2 . . . . But one could apply the same principle to
the colors blue and green instead of red . . . and they cannot each have the probability 1/2 . . . . Any
precise assessment seems quite arbitrary.1
According to Walley, the correct answer is to say, I dont have any information at all about the chance
of drawing a red marble, so I do not see why I should bet on, or against, red at any odds.
Wally then provides a different model of probability which assigns, not precise values to different
alternatives, but intervals. For example, in the absence of any information about the color of the
marbles in the bag, the model assigns the vacuous probability of 0 to 1 of drawing a red marble, which
is just what it should be for a state of complete ignorance.
Applied to the existence of God, what this means is that in the absence of any evidence whatsoever, we
should simply have no opinion about whether or not God exists. There is no implication that the
probability of Gods existence is 0.
Your friends theory resembles Rudolf Carnaps Logical Foundations of Probability (1951), in which
Carnap attempted to formalize prior probabilities in terms of state descriptions and structure
descriptions of a system. McGrew comments,
The attempt to nail down prior probabilities in an objective manner using state descriptions and
structure descriptions does capture two of our intuitions: it permits learning from experience, and it
endorses the commonsense idea that in the utter absence of information, it would be rash to be very
confident of a complex contingent claim. But it also has many problems that have been well known
since the publication of Carnaps Logical Foundations of Probability in 1951. In particular, the
probabilities are relative to the language used in the description adding more predicates changes the
7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 3/6
probabilities, a fact that Carnap himself understood very well. There are other approaches to learning
from experience that do not suffer from this defect. To use this sort of artificial system to raise a
presumption against the existence of God is really rather comical.
So dont be fooled by your friends confident appeal to basic logic. Hes just blowing smoke.
Notes
[1] Peter Walley, Inferences from Multinomial Data: Learning about a Bag of Marbles, Journal of
the Royal Statistical Society B 58/1 (1996): 3-57, pp. 4-5.
by William Lane Craig
|
Submit your question to Dr. Craig
More Q & A
Receive our free Newsletter
Get Dr. Craig's newsletter and keep up with RF news and events.
Subscribe to Dr. Craig's newsletter
Support Reasonable Faith
Reasonable Faith on Twitter
Reasonable Faith on Google Plus
Reasonable Faith on YouTube
Reasonable Faith RSS Feeds
7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 4/6
Translations
News
RF Chapters
Calendar
Store
Donate
Search
Writings
Scholarly Articles
Articles published in peer-reviewed journals
Popular Articles
Intended for a general audience
Debates
Select transcriptions of Dr. Craig's debates
Q & A
Weekly question and answer
Media
7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 5/6
Video / Audio
Debates, Talks, and Interviews
Reasonable Faith Podcast
Conversations with William Lane Craig
Defenders Podcast
Class on Christian doctrine and apologetics
Current Events Blog
Audio commentary on current events
Forums
About RF
William Lane Craig
Mission
Testimonials
Press Kit
Newsletter
Links
RF Gear
Contact Us
Help
Support Reasonable Faith
Manage Donations
My Profile
Submit a Question for Dr. Craig
RF Mobile Application
for iOS: iPhone / iPad
for Android
RF Community
Forums
Facebook
Twitter
7/14/2014 Calculating the Probability of Gods Existence | Reasonable Faith
http://www.reasonablefaith.org/calculating-the-probability-of-gods-existence 6/6
Google+
YouTube
Reasonable Faith
About RF
William Lane Craig
Testimonials
RF Chapters
Press
Privacy Policy
Contact us
Reasonable Faith Translations
Copyright Reasonable Faith. All rights reserved worldwide. Reasonable Faith is a registered 501(c)(3)
non-profit organization.