Table 1A.

School of the Respondents

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
MAMC 33 50.0 50.0 50.0
PLP 33 50.0 50.0 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0

Interpretation:
Table 1 shows the distribution of the respondents by school. It shows that 50% of the respondents are from
private school (MAMC) and 50% are from public school (PLP).

Analysis:


Table 1B. Age of the Respondents

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
17 1 1.5 1.5 1.5
18 9 13.6 13.6 15.2
19 38 57.6 57.6 72.7
20 9 13.6 13.6 86.4
21 4 6.1 6.1 92.4
23 2 3.0 3.0 95.5
27 1 1.5 1.5 97.0
33 1 1.5 1.5 98.5
34 1 1.5 1.5 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0


Table 1C. Gender of the Respondents

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Female 48 72.7 72.7 72.7
Male 18 27.3 27.3 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0


Table 1D. Respondents Family Monthly Income

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
less than 5000 4 6.1 6.1 6.1
5000 - 7999 8 12.1 12.1 18.2
8000 - 10999 15 22.7 22.7 40.9
11000 - 13999 7 10.6 10.6 51.5
14000 - 16999 5 7.6 7.6 59.1
17000 - 19999 7 10.6 10.6 69.7
20000 and above 20 30.3 30.3 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0


Table 1E. Respondents Monthly School Expenses

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
less than 1000 2 3.0 3.0 3.0
1000 - 4999 6 9.1 9.1 12.1
5000 - 9999 21 31.8 31.8 43.9
10000 - 14999 11 16.7 16.7 60.6
20000 - 24999 3 4.5 4.5 65.2
25000 and above 23 34.8 34.8 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0


Table 1F. Respondents Personal Monthly Expenses

Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
less than 1000 5 7.6 7.6 7.6
1000 - 4999 36 54.5 54.5 62.1
5000 - 9999 13 19.7 19.7 81.8
10000 - 14999 9 13.6 13.6 95.5
15000 - 19999 1 1.5 1.5 97.0
25000 and above 2 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 66 100.0 100.0


222222222222222
Basis of interpretation is the mean, if its value is;
Less than 1.80 not at all
1.80 2.59 low
2.60 3.39 moderate
3.40 4.19 high
4.20 and above very high

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Financial Stress of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I am experiencing financial
stress
33 1 5 3.30 1.159
moderate
Interpretation:
Table is the descriptive statistics of financial stress being experience by respondents from private school. It
shows that that they are experiencing moderate stress with a mean of 3.30.
Analysis:

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of Financial Stress of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I am experiencing financial
stress
33 1 4 3.15 .712
Moderate

Table 4. Independent Sample t-test of Financial Stress Between Private and Public School Respondents

School N Mean
Std.
Deviation t-value

p-value

Interpretation
I am experiencing financial
stress
MAMC 33 3.30 1.159
0.640
0.525 Not significant
PLP 33 3.15 .712
In testing the difference of two independent groups over a certain variable, the appropriate test is t-test. Table
shows that respondents between private and public school has no significant difference on their financial stress.
Both experience moderate level of financial stress with a t-value of 0.640 and p-value of 0.525.

Analysis:
For table 5 - 6
Basis of interpretation is the mean, if its value is;
Less than 1.80 strongly disagree
1.80 2.59 disagree
2.60 3.39 fairly agree
3.40 4.19 agree
4.20 and above strongly agree


Table 5A. Descriptive Statistics of Time Management of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I have less time to study 33 1 5 2.88 .992 Fairly Agree
I have poor attendance
record (tardiness and
absences)
33 1 5 1.73 .944
Strongly
Disagree
I am unable to meet
deadlines
33 1 5 2.03 .984
disagree
Time Management Mean 33 1.00 3.67 2.2121 .64452 Disagree
Interpretation:
Table 5A is the summary of descriptive statistics of time management of MAMC respondents. It shows that
respondents fairly agree that they have less time to study with a mean of 2.88, strongly disagree that they have
poor attendance record with a mean of 1.73, disagree that they unable to meet deadline. Respondents have mean
of 2,2121 on time management which can be interpreted as disagree, that is, they disagree that they have poor
time management.

Analysis:





Table 5B. Descriptive Statistics of Motivation of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I do not feel motivated to
study
33 1 4 2.21 .927
Disagree
I am unable to perform skills
correctly while on duty
33 1 4 2.00 .791
Disagree
I easily become
overwhelmed or exhausted
while on duty
33 1 4 2.09 .805
Disagree
Motivation Mean 33 1.00 4.00 2.1010 .73826 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.

Table 5C. Descriptive Statistics of Time Management of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I have difficulty in dealing
with my teacher/clinical
instructor
33 1 5 2.03 1.015
Disagree
I have difficulty in dealing
with other students
33 1 5 2.12 1.083
Disagree
I have difficulty in dealing
with patients
33 1 4 2.00 .968
Disagree
Relational Mean 33 1.00 4.00 2.0505 .86249 Disagree

Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.









Table 5D. Descriptive Statistics of Academics of MAC Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I cannot concentrate well in
class
33 1 4 2.42 .751
Disagree
I have difficulty
understanding & recalling
information during lectures
33 1 3 2.27 .674
Disagree
I cannot take exams on time
33 1 3 1.76 .751
Strongly
Disagree
I cannot attend hospital
duties due to financial
constraints
33 1 3 1.61 .747
Strongly
Disagree
I usually commit more errors
during duties
33 1 4 1.91 .805
Disagree
Academics Mean 33 1.00 3.20 1.9939 .56455 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.


66666666666666

Table 6A. Descriptive Statistics of Time Management of PLP Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I have less time to study 33 1 5 2.88 .927 Fairly Agree
I have poor attendance
record (tardiness and
absences)
33 1 5 2.15 1.149

Disagree
I am unable to meet
deadlines
33 1 4 2.45 1.092
Disagree
Time Management Mean 33 1.00 4.67 2.4949 .75056 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.

Table 6B. Descriptive Statistics of Motivation of PLP Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I do not feel motivated to
study
33 1 5 2.36 1.084
Disagree
I am unable to perform skills
correctly while on duty
33 1 4 1.91 .843
Disagree
I easily become
overwhelmed or exhausted
while on duty
33 1 5 2.42 .936
Disagree
Motivation Mean 33 1.00 3.67 2.2323 .72880 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.



Table 6C. Descriptive Statistics of Relational of PLP Respondents


N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I have difficulty in dealing
with my teacher/clinical
instructor
33 1 3 1.85 .712
Disagree
I have difficulty in dealing
with other students
33 1 4 2.06 .788
Disagree
I have difficulty in dealing
with patients
33 1 3 1.82 .683
Disagree
Relational Mean 33 1.00 3.00 1.9091 .66287 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.

Table 6D. Descriptive Statistics of Academics of PLP Respondents

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Interpretation
I cannot concentrate well in
class
33 1 4 2.03 .883
Disagree
I have difficulty
understanding & recalling
information during lectures
33 1 4 1.97 .770
Disagree
I cannot take exams on time 33 1 4 1.88 .857 Disagree
I cannot attend hospital
duties due to financial
constraints
33 1 4 1.76 .792
Strongly
Disagree
I usually commit more errors
during duties
33 1 3 1.67 .645
Strongly
Disagree
Academics Mean 33 1.00 3.20 1.8606 .63538 Disagree
Interpretation:
Same as on table 5A.



Table 7A. Independent Sample t-test of Time Management Between MAMC and PLP Respondents

School N Mean
Std.
Deviation t-value

p-value

Interpretation
I have less time to study MAMC 33 2.88 .992 0.000 1.000 Not significant
PLP 33 2.88 .927
I have poor attendance
record (tardiness and
absences)
MAMC 33 1.73 .944
-1.639
0.106 Not significant
PLP
33 2.15 1.149
I am unable to meet
deadlines
MAMC 33 2.03 .984
-1.658
0.102 Not significant
PLP 33 2.45 1.092
Time Management Mean MAMC 33 2.2121 .64452
-1.642
0.105 Not significant
PLP 33 2.4949 .75056
Interpretation:
Table 7A is the summary of t-test of time management between public and private school respondents. Since
the value of t are all less than 2, it suggest a non-significant difference on all the variables pertaining to time
management between private and public respondents. They experience the same on time to study, attendance
and meeting deadlines.

Analysis:

Table 7B. Independent Sample t-test of Motivation Between MAMC and PLP Respondents

School N Mean
Std.
Deviation t-value

p-value

Interpretation
I do not feel motivated to
study
MAMC 33 2.21 .927
0.610
0.544 Not significant
PLP 33 2.36 1.084
I am unable to perform skills
correctly while on duty
MAMC 33 2.00 .791
0.452
0.653 Not significant
PLP 33 1.91 .843
I easily become
overwhelmed or exhausted
while on duty
MAMC 33 2.09 .805
-1.551
0.126 Not significant
PLP
33 2.42 .936
Motivation Mean MAMC 33 2.1010 .73826
0.727
0.470 Not significant
PLP 33 2.2323 .72880






Table 7C. Independent Sample t-test of Relational Between MAMC and PLP Respondents

School N Mean
Std.
Deviation t-value

p-value

Interpretation
I have difficulty in dealing
with my teacher/clinical
instructor
MAMC 33 2.03 1.015
0.842
0.403 Not significant
PLP
33 1.85 .712
I have difficulty in dealing MAMC 33 2.12 1.083 0.260 0.796 Not significant
with other students PLP 33 2.06 .788
I have difficulty in dealing
with patients
MAMC 33 2.00 .968
0.882
0.381 Not significant
PLP 33 1.82 .683
Relational Mean MAMC 33 2.0505 .86249
0.747
0.458 Not significant
PLP 33 1.9091 .66287




Table 7D. Independent Sample t-test of Academics Between MAMC and PLP Respondents

School N Mean
Std.
Deviation t-value

p-value

Interpretation
I cannot concentrate well in
class
MAMC 33 2.42 .751
1.952
0.055 Not significant
PLP 33 2.03 .883
I have difficulty
understanding & recalling
information during lectures
MAMC 33 2.27 .674
1.701
0.094 Not significant
PLP
33 1.97 .770
I cannot take exams on time MAMC 33 1.76 .751
-0.611
0.543 Not significant
PLP 33 1.88 .857
I cannot attend hospital
duties due to financial
constraints
MAMC 33 1.61 .747
-0.799
0.427 Not significant
PLP
33 1.76 .792
I usually commit more errors
during duties
MAMC 33 1.91 .805
1.350
0.182 Not significant
PLP 33 1.67 .645
Academics Mean MAMC 33 1.9939 .56455
0.901
0.371 Not significant
PLP 33 1.8606 .63538









Table 8. Correlation of Financial Stress and Academic Performance of MAMC Respondents

I am experiencing
financial stress Interpretation
Time Management Mean Pearson Correlation .009
Not significant
Sig. (2-tailed) .961
N 33
Motivation Mean Pearson Correlation -.049
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .786
N 33
Relation Mean Pearson Correlation .078
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .666
N 33
Academics Mean Pearson Correlation .175
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .330
N 33
Interpretation:
Table above is the correlation of financial stress and academic performance of private respondents. It shows that
their degree of relationship is not significant (p-value greater than 0.05). That is, financial stress being
experience by students in private school has nothing to do with their academic performance in terms of time
management, motivation, relational and academics.

Analysis:

Table 9. Correlation of Financial Stress and Academic Performance of PLP Respondents

I am experiencing
financial stress Interpretation
Time Management Mean Pearson Correlation .089
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .622
N 33
Motivation Mean Pearson Correlation .131
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .468
N 33
Relation Mean Pearson Correlation -.014
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .938
N 33
Academics Mean Pearson Correlation .228
Not significant Sig. (2-tailed) .203
N 33