Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PERCENTAGE
8)&"5(. ICU 0 0
S%<2"5(. ICU 6 12
E*)<2)15' 10 20
C(<&"(5 ICU 4 8
OT 2 4
OPD 0 0
8)&"5(. A(<& 11 22
S%<2"5(. A(<& 9 18
T,$(. 42 84
The aove tale sho's that in relation to the area of 'or,
experience maximum %// J& of nursing personnel had
experience in $edical 'ard and only 1J 'ere from BT.
TABLE:6 7 FREEUENC AND PERCENTAGE
DISTRIBUTION OF NURSING PERSONNEL
ACCORDING TO T9EIR PREVIOUS
INFOR8ATION
N H 50
PREVIOUS
INFOR8ATE8TIO
N ON TRIAGE
SSTE8
FREEUENC
PERCENTAGE
P)<#,11). 7 .1
P<"1$)& 8)&"( 35 83
E.)5$<,1"5
8)&"(
8 .<
T,$(. 50 100
The aove tale sho's that .1 J of the nursing
personnel had previous Information on triage
system from personnel media( 83 J had from
printed $edia and .<J from electronic media.
R)+<)#)1$"12 +)<5)1$(2) &"#$<"3%$",1 ,-
1%<#"12 +)<#,11). (55,<&"12 +<)6",%#
"1-,<*($",1
FIGURES:8
SECTION:II
PRE TEST LEVEL OF KNOALEDGE OF NURSING PERSONNEL ON
TRIAGE SSTE8
TABLE:7
8EANI 8EAN PERCENTAGE AND STANDARD DEVIATION OF T9E
PRETEST KNOALEDGE SCORE OF NURSING PERSONNEL ON
TRIAGE
SSTE8.
A R 23
SL.
NO
ASPECTS OF KNOALEDGE ON
TRIAGE SSTE8
8EAN 8EANJ S.D
I $eaning and Evolution of Triage 1.62 13.2 3.9320
2 Types( #oal P Function In ED /(.1 1/.9 3.8
3 $ethod of Triage System In ED 1.<9 /< ..=81
4
Triage components( Triage Process
and Aursing Process In Triage System
..8/ /9.<8 3.28/=
5 Importance and ene>ts of Triage
system in Emergency Department
1.28 <1 3.8
Bverall 11.44 13.0= 1.820.
The aove tale sho's that the maximum mean
percentage otained y the nursing personnel is <1 'ith
standard deviation of 3.8 in the aspects of Triage components(
Triage Process and Aursing Process in Triage System. The
minimum mean percentage is /< 'ith standard deviation ..=8 in
the aspect of $ethod of Triage System. The overall ,no'ledge
otained y the nursing personnel on triage system is 13.0=
'ith standard deviation 1.820.
TABLE:87 FREEUENC AND PERCENTAGE
DISTRIBUTION OF PRETEST LEVEL OF KNOALEDGE
OF NURSING PERSONNEL ON
TRIAGE SSTE8
NH50
SI.
N,.
L)6).
,-
=1,0.)&
2)
I1(&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
K50J
8,&)<($).'
(&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
50:75J
A&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
L75J
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
1. Pretest 48 96J 02 04J M M
The aove tale sho's that the maximum =<J nursing
personnel had inade5uate ,no'ledge 'hereas 31J of
nursing personnel had moderate ,no'ledge and none had
ade5uate ,no'ledge on triage system in emergency
department.
FIGURE ) 9
I Pretest 4no'ledge
SECTION III
POST TEST LEVEL OF KNOALEDGE OF NURSING
PERSONNEL ON
TRIAGE SSTE8
TABLE - 097 8EANI 8EAN PERCENTAGE AND STANDARD
DEVIATION OF T9E POSTTEST KNOALEDGE SCORE OF
NURSING PERSONNEL.
A R 23
SF.
AB
ASPE"TS BF 4ABEFED#E $EAA $EAA
J
S.D
. $eaning and Evolution of Triage 0.91 =< 3.08
/ Types( #oal P Function In ED 1.2/ =3.1 3.23
0 $ethod of Triage System In ED .<.01 =3.89 3.<<
1 Triage components( Triage Process
and Aursing Process In Triage System
1.=1 9/.00 3.</
2 Importance and ene>ts of Triage
system in Emergency Department
..99 =1 3.00
< Bverall 0..2/ =3.83/ /.19
The aove tale sho's that the maximum mean
percentage otained y the nursing personnel is =< 'ith
standard deviation 3.08in the aspects meaning and
evolution of Triage system. The minimum mean percentage
is 9/.00'ith standard deviation 3.</ of Triage "omponents
of Triage System. The overall ,no'ledge otained y the
nursing personnel in post test is =3... 'ith standard
deviation /.19.
TABLE:IO7 FREEUENC AND PERCENTAGE
DISTRIBUTION OF POST TEST LEVEL OF
KNOALEDGE OF NURSING PERSONNEL
N H 50
SI.
N,
.
L)6).
,-
=1,0.)
&2)
I1(&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
K50J
8,&)<($).'
(&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
50:75J
A&)G%($)
=1,0.)&2)
L75J
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
F<)G%)15'
P)<5)1$(2)
1. Posttest M M 03 06 18 =1
The aove tale sho's that the maximum% =1 J &
numer of nursing personnel had ade5uate ,no'ledge and
<J of nursing personnel had moderate ,no'ledge on triage
system in post test.
FIGURE :10
SECTION:IV
EFFECTIVENESS OF STRUCTURED TEAC9ING PROGRA88E
REGARDING ON TRIAGE SSTE8
TABLE:117 CO8PARISON OF PRE TEST AND POST TEST OF
KNOALEDGE SCORES A8ONG NURSING PERSONNELON
TRIAGE
SSTE8
N H 23
ASPECTS OF
KNOALEDGE
PRE TEST POST TEST BT;
VAFCE
8EAN SD 8EAN SD
$eaning and
Evolution of Triage
..</ 3.9320 0.91 3.08 ;.8.93
Types( #oal P Function
In ED
/..1 3.8 1.2/ 3.23 Z .=.2
$ethod of Triage
System In ED
1.<9 ..=81 .<.01 3.<< ;0=.8
Triage components(
Triage Process and
Aursing Process In
Triage System In ED
..8/ 3.28/= 1.=1 3.</ ;/8.32
Importance and
ene>ts of Triage
system in Emergency
../9 3.8 ..99 3.00 ;2.19
Bverall 4no'ledge ...11 1.820. 0..2/ /.19 ;/<.1=
;is signi>cantT AS6 is not signi>cant PY3.3. level
From the aove tale it is evident that in pre test the
overall mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith standard
deviation 1.82 and in post test of overall mean ,no'ledge
value is 0..2/ 'ith standard deviation /.19.
It is evident that the otained :t: value /<.1= is greater than
the tale value at 3.3. level of signi>cance. Therefore T
value is found to e signi>cant. It means there is gain in
,no'ledge level of nursing personnel. This study supports
the structure teaching programme on triage system( is
e*ective in increasing the ,no'ledge level of nursing
personnel. ?ence the null hypothesis framed for the study is
re@ected.
REPRESENTINGCO8PARISON OF PRE AND
POSTTEST 8EAN KNOALEDGE OF NURSING
PERSONNEL IN VARIOUS ASPECTS ON
TRIAGE SSTE8
R)+<)#)1"12 5,*+(<"#",1 ,- +<) (1& +,#$
$)#$ *)(1 =1,0.)&2) ,- 1%<#"12 +)<#,11). "1
6(<"%# (#+)5$# ,1 $<"(2) #'#$)*
P
VARIUS ASPECTS ON TRIAGE SSTE8 IN
E8ERGENC DEPART8ENT
FI#C!E )..
./3
.33
F
)
93
<3
)))))))))
m
i
L
/3
FIGURE :9
SECTION:V
TABLE :12 7 ASSOCIATION BETAEEN T9E LEVELS OF
KNOALEDGE
AIT9 T9EIR DE8OGRAP9IC VARIABLES
AR
.3
Bverall ,no'ledge
Demographi
cal variales
Inade5ua
te
,no'ledg
e
$oderatel
y
ade5uate
,no'ledg
Ade5ua
te
,no'led
ge
"hi
s5uare
H
/
value
Ao. Ao. Ao.
Age in
Gears
/3)/= M / 00
H
/
R1./
2
DfR/
03)0= M . .0
13)1= M M .
23)2= M M M
#ender $ale M M .<
HWR3.
80 Female M 0 0.
Profession
al
Iuali>cati
on
#A$ M / 02
H
/
R3.<
2
DfRl
-.Sc. Aursing M . ./
$.Sc. Aursing M M M
Total year
of
experienc
e
Y.3 M 0 13
H
/
R3.3
=
DfRl
.3)/3 M M 38
/.)03 M M M
X03 M M M
Area of
Experien
ce
$edical I"C M M M
H
/
R8..3
2
DfR8
Surgical I"C M M 3<
Emergenc
y
M M .3
"ardiac I"C M M 31
BT M M 3/
BPD M M M
Pediatrics M M 39
$edical Eard N . .3
Surgical Eard M / 38
Previous
informati
on
on Triage
system
Personnel M M 38
H
/
)..11
DfR/
Printed $edia M / 00
Electronic
$edia
M . 38
; 6 is signi>cant S 6 is signi>cant
The aove tale sho's that the otained Dt
/
value is more than the tale
value oth at 3.3. and 3.32 levels of signi>cance. Therefore the research
hypothesis is accepted and sho's that there is signi>cant association
et'een selected demographic variales 'ith the ,no'ledge scores of
participants.
6. DISCUSSION
This chapter deals 'ith the discussion in accordance
'ith the o@ectives and hypothesis of the study.
The statement of the prolem +A study to assess the
e*ectiveness of structured teaching program on ,no'ledge
regarding triage system of patient in emergency
department among nursing personnel in a selected hospital
at -huanes'ar.
OB@ECTIVES
.. To assess the ,no'ledge regarding triage system of
patient in Emergency Department among nursing
personnel on the asis of pre test score.
/. To develop a structure teaching programme on triage
system of patients in Emergency Department.
0. To conduct a structure teaching programme on triage
system of patient in Emergency Department among
nursing personnel in selected hospital at -huanes'ar
1. To evaluate the e*ectiveness of structured teaching
programme regarding triage system of patient in
Emergency Department y comparing pre test and pos
test ,no'ledge scores among nursing personnel.
2. To determine the association et'een the ,no'ledge
of nursing personnel regarding triage system of
patients in Emergency Department 'ith selected
demographic variales.
S)5$",1 I7 F"1&"12# <)2(<&"12 D)*,2<(+!"5
V(<"(3.) ,- 1%<#"12 +)<#,11). AGE7
The distriution of the su@ect y age revealed that
ma@ority of nursing personnel %83 J& elongs to the age
group of /3)/= years.
This >nding is supported y Susan %/332& 'ho
assessed ,no'ledge of nurses on selected aspects of
antepartal assessment of fetal 'elleing and found that
ma@ority of nurses 00 %11J& 'ere in the age group et'een
/. ) /2 years.
09
GENDER
Eith regard to gender of nursing personnel( ma@ority
of them %<9J& 'ere females and only 0/J 'ere males.
This >nding is supported y study done y Poornima
%/3.3& 'ho assessed ,no'ledge of sta* nurses on
prevention of Dengue fever has found that ma@ority of
nurses 10 %9<J& 'ere female nursing personnel and 8 %.1J&
'ere male.
0=
PROFESSIONAL EUALIFICATION
Eith regard to professional 5uali>cation of nursing
personnel( 8/J of them 'ere having general nursing and
mid'ifery and only /9J 'ere 'ith -.Sc %A& degree.
This study is supported y Sidduvasanthi %/3.3& 'ho
assessed the ,no'ledge of sta* nurses on pre operative
care of "A-# patients( has found that 2<J of nursing
personnel had #A$ and 11J had -Sc %A& as their
professional 5uali>cation.
13
TOTAL EARS OF EXPERIENCE
Eith regard to the total years of experience of nursing
personnel( ma@ority %91JX& of nursing personnel 'ere
having Y .3yrs years of 'or, experience.
This result 'as supported y a study 'hich 'as
conducted y Srinivas %/330& 'ho assessed the ,no'ledge
of sta* nurses regarding care of patient 'ith diaetic
mellitus and found that ma@ority of su@ects had Y.3years
of experience. :
AREA OF EXPERIENCE
Eith regard to the area of 'or, experience maximum
%// J& of nursing personnel had experience in $edical 'ard
and only 1J 'ere had experience in BT.As more numer of
nurses are 'or,ing in medical 'ard the participants 'ere
found more in $edical 'ard.
SOURCE OF PREVIOUS INFOR8ATION
Eith regard to the source of previous information .1
J of the nursing personnel had previous Information on
triage system from personnel media( 83 J had from printed
$edia and .<J from electronic media. $a@ority of nurses
follo' oo,s and @ournals to get information.
S)5$",1 II7 A##)##*)1$ ,- K1,0.)&2) .)6). ,- 1%<#"12
+)<#,11).
The maximum %=<J& nursing personnel had
inade5uate ,no'ledge 'hereas 31J of nursing personnel
had moderate ,no'ledge and none had ade5uate
,no'ledge on triage system in emergency department in
pre test. The overall mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith
standard deviation 1.82.
This study supported y Adosi( $'idimi E %/33=&
'ho assessed the e*ectiveness of planned teaching
programme on nurses ,no'ledge of pharmacology ehind
drugs they commonly administer( are found that the pretest
,no'ledge score 'as ./.12 'ith standard deviation 2.#
$ 2
S)5$",1 III7 E>)5$"6)1)## ,- +.(11)& $)(5!"12
+<,2<(**) ,1 =1,0.)&2) <)2(<&"12 $<"(2) #'#$)*
"1 E*)<2)15' D)+(<$*)1$.
The present study sho'ed that in pre test the overall
mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith standard deviation
1.82 and in post test of overall mean ,no'ledge value is
0..2/ 'ith standard deviation /.19. It is evident that the
otained :t[ value /<.1= is greater than the tale value at
3.3. level of signi>cance. Therefore :t: value is found to e
signi>cant. It means there is gain in ,no'ledge level of
nursing personnel. This study supports the structure
teaching programme on triage system( is e*ective in
increasing the ,no'ledge level of nursing personnel. ?ence
the null hypothesis framed for the study is re@ected.
This study 'as supported y $eena "hac,o%/338&
'hich revealed that the structured teaching programme 'as
e*ective in increasing the ,no'ledge of nurses on
thromolytic therapy as the computed +t+ value 'as
signi>cant at B.BSlevel.:
.
S)5$",1 IV7 A##,5"($",1 3)$0))1 $!) +,#$:$)#$
K1,0.)&2) #5,<)# 0"$! #).)5$)& &)*,2<(+!"5(.
6(<"(3.)#
The analysis 'as done for association et'een post
test level of ,no'ledge 'ith selected demographic
variales. It 'as evident that there 'as no statistically
signi>cant association et'een the ,no'ledge score 'ith
selected demographic variales.
This study is supported y $enon "D %/338& 'ho
conducted a study to assess the e*ectiveness of STP on
,no'ledge regarding care of patient 'ith head in@ury among
sta* nurses 'or,ing in selected hospital( -angalore and
found that there 'as no signi>cant association et'een
,no'ledge score 'ith selected demographic variale.
7. CONCLUSION
This chapter deals 'ith the ma@or >ndings of the study(
nursing implications( limitations and recommendations.
8A@OR FINDINGS OF T9E STUD
I. F"1&"12# <).($)& $, &)*,2<(+!"5 6(<"(3.)#
$a@ority of the nursing personnel %83 J&(elonged to
age of /. /=yrs
$ost of them %<9J & 'ere Females.
$a@ority of them %8/J& had #A$ as their professional
5uali>cation.
Aout 91J of nursing personnel 'ere having
experience Y .3yrs.
$a@ority of nursing personnel %//J& 'ere experienced
m medical 'ard.
$a@ority of them %83J& had previous information from
printed media.
II. F"1&"12# <).($)& to =1,0.)&2) ,- 1%<#"12
+)<#,11). ,1 $<"(2) #'#$)* "1 E*)<2)15'
D)+(<$*)1$
The maximum %=<J& nursing personnel had
inade5uate ,no'ledge 'hereas 31J of nursing personnel
had moderate ,no'ledge and none had ade5uate
,no'ledge on triage system in emergency department in
pre test. The overall mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith
standard deviation 1.82.
III. E>)5$"6)1)## ,- +.(11)& $)(5!"12 +<,2<(**)
,1 =1,0.)&2) <)2(<&"12 $<"(2) #'#$)* "1 E*)<2)15'
D)+(<$*)1$.
After the planned teaching programme to nursing
personnel .33J 'ere in the group of ade5uate ,no'ledge
and none of the patients 'ere in the group of moderate
,no'ledge and inade5uate ,no'ledge in post test.
The present study sho'ed that in pre test the overall
mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith standard deviation 1.82
and in post test of overall mean ,no'ledge value is 0..2/
'ith standard deviation /.19. It is evident that the otained
:t: value /<.1= is greater than the tale value at 3.3. level
of signi>cance. Therefore :t: value is found to e signi>cant.
It means there is gain in ,no'ledge level of nursing
personnel. This study supports the structure teaching
programme on triage system( is e*ective in increasing the
,no'ledge level of nursing personnel. ?ence the null
hypothesis framed for the study is re@ected.
S)5$",1 IV7 A##,5"($",1 3)$0))1 $!) +,#$:$)#$
K1,0.)&2) #5,<)# 0"$! #).)5$)& &)*,2<(+!"5(.
6(<"(3.)#
Association et'een post test scores of the nursing
personnel and demographic variale 'as calculated y
using chi)s5uare test.
The result sho'ed that the otained H
/
value is more
than the tale value oth at 3.3. and 3.32 levels of
signi>cance. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted and
sho's that there is no signi>cant association et'een
selected demographic variales 'ith the ,no'ledge scores
of participants.
I8PLICATIONS OF T9E STUD
The >ndings of this study have implications in various
areas of nursing namely nursing practice( nursing
education( nursing administration and nursing research.
N%<#"12 )&%5($",17
Aursing education help the sta* and student 'ith
ade5uate ,no'ledge to ful>ll their duties and
responsiilities in the nursing >eld. The study emphasi7e
the need for developing good teaching programme for
nurses on triage system in order to etter categori7ation
of patient in emergency department. Aurses should e
e5uipped 'ith updated ,no'ledge to care patients in
Emergency Department. A regular evaluation module
should e practiced to update their ,no'ledge.
N%<#"12 +<(5$"5)7
The >ndings of the study reveal that there is a need to
understand the reasons ehind the poor ,no'ledge among
nursing personnel on triage system. So nurse educators
need to ta,e responsiility to ma,e nurse:s ,no'ledgeale.
Aurses should e e5uipped 'ith updated ,no'ledge to care
patients in Emergency Department. The nurse educator
should have regular in)service teaching programme for
nursing personnel to update their ,no'ledge.
N%<#"12 (&*"1"#$<($",17
Aursing administration should ensure that periodical
conduction of training programme to nursing personnel to
improve their ,no'ledge. Aurse administrator must ma,e
sure that educational and informational material should have
consistent information 'hich can e displayed in Emergency
Department and also should organi7e seminars and
'or,shops on Triage system in Emergency Department to
improve ,no'ledge of nurses.
N%<#"12 <)#)(<5!7
This study 'ill e motivated for udding researcher to
conduct similar studies on large scale. The study 'ill e a
reference for research scholars.
LI8ITATION
Simple random sampling and only 23 nursing
personnel have ta,en participation 'hich limits the
generali7ation of the study.
Bnly one domain that is ,no'ledge 'as considered in
the present.
The ,no'ledge of the nursing personnel 'as assessed
only through structured ,no'ledge 5uestionnaire.
RECO88ENDATIONS7
Bn the asis of the study >ndings the follo'ing
recommendations 'ere made for further research.
The study can e replicated in di*erent setting.
The study can e done 'ith a large numer of sample.
A comparative study can e conducted et'een
,no'ledge and s,ills.
A true experimental study can e conducted 'ith
experimental and control group to assess the
e*ectiveness of structured teaching programme.
The chapter deals 'ith the o@ectives of the study( hypothesis(
methodology and ma@or >ndings of the study.
OB@ECTIVES OF T9E STUD
.. To assess+ the ,no'ledge regarding triage system of patient
in Emergency Department among nursing personnel on the
asis of pre test score.
/. To develop a structure teaching programme on triage system
of patients in Emergency Department.
0. To conduct a structure teaching programme on triage system
of patient in Emergency Department among nursing personnel
in selected hospital at -huanes'ar.
1. To evaluate the e*ectiveness of structured teaching
programme regarding triage system of patient in Emergency
Department y comparing pre test and pos test ,no'ledge
scores among nursing personnel.
2. To determine the association et'een the ,no'ledge of
nursing personnel regarding triage system of patients in
Emergency Department 'ith selected demographic
variales.
9POT9ESIS
?o. There 'ill e no signi>cant di*erence et'een pre test and
post test ,no'ledge scores of nursing personnel regarding triage
system of patient in Emergency Department.
?3/ There 'ill e no signi>cant association et'een post test
,no'ledge scores of nursing personnel 'ith their selected
demographic variale.
8.
8ET9ODOLOG
For this study conceptual frame 'or, is ased on
lud'ig von ertalan*y:s general system model. The
approach used for this study 'as evaluative research
approach. Pre experimental design 'as used. A total of 23
nursing personnel 'ho met the inclusive criteria 'ere
selected y using simple random sampling techni5ue. The
investigator introduced herself and aout the study(
otained consent from the participants and data 'as
collected.
The researcher used a structured 5uestionnaire for the
data collection. The tool consists of / parts.
P(<$:I: D)*,2<(+!"5 D($(
This part consisted of < items pertaining to the
demographic variales of the su@ects such as age( gender(
professional 5uali>cation( total year of 'or, experience(
area of experience( sources of previous information
regarding triage system in emergency department.
P(<$ ) II ) Assessment ,- K1,0.)&2)
Structured ,no'ledge 5uestionnaire 'as used to
assess the ,no'ledge of nursing personnel on triage system
of patient in Emergency Department. The 5uestionnaire
consists of 02 o@ective type 5uestions. Each 5uestion has 1
choices and participants need to select the correct one. The
5uestions 'ere developed as to cover the follo'ing topics 6
$eaning and Evolution of Triage
Types( #oals PFunction of Triage in Emergency
Department %ED&\
$ethods of Triage System in Emergency Department
%ED&
Triage components( Triage process and Aursing
process in Triage System In Emergency Department.
Importance and ene>ts of Triage system in
Emergency Department%ED&
The pilot study 'as conducted to >nd the
feasiility of the study on.8.././3.0 among .3 nursing
personnel 'ho ful>lled inclusion criteria at $edicare
?ospital( -angalore. The main study 'as conducted
from:/9Q.Q.1 to 2Q/Q.1 among 23 nursing personnel 'ho
'ere selected y random sampling techni5ue using lottery
method and the data analy7ed using descriptive and
inferential statistics.
8A@OR FINDINGS OF STUD
I. F"1&"12# <).($)& $, &)*,2<(+!"5 6(<"(3.)#
$a@ority of the nursing personnel %83 J&(elonged to
age of /.)/=yrs
$ost of them %<9J& 'ere Females.
$a@ority of them %8/J& had professional 5uali>cation
of #A$ .
Aout 91J of nursing personnel 'ere having
experience Y .3yrs.
$a@ority of nursing personnel %//J& 'ere experienced
in medical 'ard.
$ost of them %83J& had previous information from
printed media.
II. F"1&"12# <).($)& $, =1,0.)&2) #5,<) <)2(<&"12
$<"(2) #'#$)* "1 )*)<2)15' &)+(<$*)1$
The maximum =<J nursing personnel had inade5uate
,no'ledge 'hereas 31J of nursing personnel had
moderate ,no'ledge and none had ade5uate ,no'ledge on
triage system in emergency department in pre test. The
overall mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith standard
deviation 1.82.Since the ,no'ledge 'as found to e
inade5uateT a structured teaching programme 'as
conducted.
III. C,*+(<"12 +<) (1& +,#$ $)#$ =1,0.)&2) #5,<)
<)2(<&"12 $<"(2) #'#$)* "1 )*)<2)15' &)+(<$*)1$.
After the planned teaching programme to nursing
personnel .33J 'ere in the group of ade5uate ,no'ledge
and none of the patients 'ere in the group of moderate
,no'ledge and inade5uate ,no'ledge in post test.
The present study sho'ed that in pre test the overall
mean ,no'ledge value is ...11 'ith standard deviation
1.82 and in post test of overall mean ,no'ledge value is
0..2/ 'ith standard deviation /.19. It is evident that the
otained :t: value /<.1= is greater than the tale value at
3.3. level of signi>cance. Therefore :t: value is found to e
signi>cant. It means there is gain in ,no'ledge level of
nursing personnel. This study supports the structure
teaching programme on triage system( is e*ective in
increasing the ,no'ledge level of nursing personnel. ?ence
the null hypothesis framed for the study is re@ected.
IV. F"1&"12# <).($)& $, (##,5"($",1 3)$0))1 +,#$
$)#$ =1,0.)&2) #5,<) 0"$! #).)5$)&
&)*,2<(+!"5 6(<"(3.)#
Association et'een post test scores of the nursing
personnel and demographic variale 'as calculated y
using chi)s5uare test.
The result sho'ed that the otained H value is more
than the tale value oth at 3.3. and 3.32 levels of
signi>cance. Therefore the null hypothesis is accepted and
sho's that there is no signi>cant association et'een
selected demographic variales 'ith the ,no'ledge scores
of participants.
SU88AR
This chapter riefs the o@ectives of the study(
research hypothesis( methodology and ma@or >ndings of
this study.
9. BIBLIOGRAP9
.. Availalefrom6C!F6http6QQ'''.eniro.'ho.intQenih@QV.<Q3<Q.<\<\/3
.3\3<=3 \3<=9.pdf)saudiaraia
/. Availale from 6C!F 7!$$+7OO)1.0"="+)&"(.,<2O0"="OT<"(2)
0. Emergency $edicine Dournal./33<.Availale from 6C!F
http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpmcQarticlesQP$"/2<131<Q
1. Availale from 6 C!F6
http6QQem@.m@.comQcontentQ/<Q8Q191.astract
2. Availalefrom6C!F6http6QQ'''.emro.'ho.intQemh@QV.<Q3<Q.<\<\/
3.3\3<=3 \3<=9.pdf)saudiaraia
<. Availale from
6C!F 6http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpumedQ.32898/0
8. Availale from6 C!F6 http6QQ'''.emro.'ho.intQemh@QVl
<Q3<Q.<\<\/3.3\3<=3 \3<=9.pdf)saudiaraia
9. Polit F Dense(?ungler P -emaditte
2
Aursing !esearch principles
and method <
lh
edition(Philadetphia6lippincotT.===.P 089
=. Availale from 6C!F6
http6QQ'''.health.vic.gov.auQemergencyQgdocsQlitv.pdf
.3. Availale from 6 C!F6httpTQQ'''.c@em)online.caQv0Qn0Qpl=9
... Availale from6 C!F6 http6QQ'''.emro.'ho.intQemh@QVl
<Q3<Q.<\<\/3.3\3<=3 \3<=9.pdf)saudiaraia
./. Availale from 6C!F6
http6QQem@.m@.comQcontentQ/0Q./Q=3<.astract
.0. Availale from 6C!F6
http6QQ'''.health.vic.gov.auQemergencyQgdocsQIitrev.pdf
.1. Availale from 6 C!F6http6QQ'''.c@em)onVine.caQv0Qn0Qpl==
.2. Availale from 6C!F6
http6QQem@.m@.comQcontentQ/0Q./Q=3<.astract
.<. Availale from6 C!F6
http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpumedQ.9280=2=
.8. Availale from6 C!Fhttp6QQ'''.c@em)online.caQv=Qn1Qp/<3
.9. Availale from6C!F6
http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpumedQ.=</2219
.=. Arslanian( engoren ".D "ardiovascAurs./33=Dan)
Fe6/1%l&619)=
/3. Availale from6C!F6http6QQ'''. si',r]yahoo.com
/.. 4riemgsoontom,i@'( ?omcheon-( "homchai ".
Aeamsomoon E. Division of amulatory pediatric(
Department of pediatric(
//. Availale from
6C!F6http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpumedQ.8<2<<39
/0. Availale from 6C!F6 http6QQ'''.nci.nlm.nih.govQpumeoVl
..28/=1
/1. Availale from6C!F6http6QQ'''.nci.nIm.nih.govQpumedQl
./0=/20
/2. Availale from 6 C!F6 http6QQ'''.
nci.nlm.nih.govQpumedQ/3083822
/<. Availale from6
C!FThttp6QQ'''.scrid.comQdocQ/8003088Q"onsistency)of)
Triage)n)VictoriaJE/^Qo93J==s)Emergency)Departments.
/8. Vi@ayala,shmi S( !aman AV( Aursing Dournal Bf India. Aug
/33/
/9. Siddu VasanthiE*ectiveness of planned teaching
programme for sta* nurses regarding pre operative nursing
care of clients undergoing "A-# 6the !#?CS(-angalore6un
phiished $sc.nursing desertation6/3.3
/=. Thilagavathi.E*ectiveness of planned teaching programme
on ,no'ledge regarding iron de>ciency anemia among
high school girls6 the Dr.$#! $edical Cniversity(
Tamilnadu6 un pulished $sc.Aursing dissertation6 /33..
03. Crology department christisn medical college and hospital(
vellore( PTP given to pts a'aiting ESEF(/338Dune(Vol%0&(
0.. Dayalapatidar. e*ectiveness of planned teaching
programme( nightingale nursing times /33= $ayT Vol 2(%.&
/<)/=.
0/. Dournal of emergency nursing DEA oNcial pulication of the
Emergency Department Aurses Association. Gear /332(
voIume)0.(issue)0(page)10< to 11..
00. Availale from6 C!FT http6QQ'''.c@em)online.caQv=Qn1Qp/<3
01. Availale from6 C!FT
http6QQ'''.ahr5.govQresearchQesiQesi0.htm
02. -asavanthappa -T(Aursing !esearch(l
sl
edition(Daypee
pulisher(Ae' Delhi(/331.P1=(./8(/./(/93.
0<. Polit F Dense(?ungler P -emaditte(Aursing research
principles and methods <
th
08. Polit F(and "heryl Tatano -ec,(Aursing research principles
and methods(Fippincoott(Philadelphia(/331.P.1.<.
09. -ay 4 Susan.4no'ledge of nurses on selected aspects of
antepatal assessment of fetal 'elleing 'or,ing in selected
?ospital(-angalore.!#?CS./339.
0=. Poomima %/3.3& 'ho assessed ,no'ledge of sta* nurses
on prevention of Dengue fever in selected hospitals(
4olar(-angalore
13. Siddu VasanthiE*ectiveness of planned teaching
programme for sta* nurses regarding pre operative
nursing care of clients undergoing "A-# 6the !#?CS(-an
galore 6un pluished $sc.nursing desertation6/3.3
1.. Snnivas.A study to assess the ,no'ledge of sta* nurse
regarding care of patient 'ith D$.!#?CS./330(
1/. Daslin. E*ectiveness of self instructional module on selected
drugs used in critical care unit.!#C?S./332.
10. $eena chac,o.A study to assess the e*ectiveness of STP
on ,no'ledge regarding care of patient 'ith headin@ury
among sta* nurses 'or,ing in selected hospital
-angalore.-angalore !#C?S./338.
11. y $enon "D %/338& 'ho conducted a study to assess the
e*ectiveness of STP on ,no'ledge regarding care of
patient 'ith head in@ury among sta* nurses 'or,ing in
selected hospital( -angalore