Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
(b) (5 points) Suppose a R satises 0 a < for every > 0. Prove that a = 0.
[Hint: Consider 2
1
a.]
Suppose a > 0. By the Lemma proved below, it would follow that
a > 2
1
a > 0. (*)
But our hypothesis would in turn imply that a < 2
1
a (taking = 2
1
a);
the two inequalities together contradict (P10). It follows that a cannot be
positive, and hence, that a = 0 as claimed.
Lemma: If a > 0, then (*) holds.
Proof: We have
2
1
a + 2
1
a =
_
2
1
a
_
(1 + 1) by (P6) and (P9)
= a
_
2
1
2
_
by (P1) and (P8)
= a by (P6) and (P7).
It follows from part (a) above that
2
1
a > 0. (**)
Applying Lemma 1 and (P2) to (**) yields
a = 2
1
a + 2
1
a > 0 + 2
1
a = 2
1
a. (***)
Combining inequalities (**) and (***) proves the claim.
continued on page 3
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 3 of 16
Page intentionally left blank for scratch work.
continued on page 4
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 4 of 16
(2) (a) (5 points) Given a nested sequence of nonempty closed intervals
I
1
I
2
I
3
Prove that
n=1
I
n
= .
Since each interval I
n
is closed and nonempty, we can write I
n
= [a
n
, b
n
] for
some real numbers a
n
b
n
. Moreover, since I
n
I
n+1
, we have a
n
a
n+1
and b
n
b
n+1
for all n N. It follows that
b
n
a
k
k, n N.
Indeed, if k n we have a
k
a
n
b
n
, while if n k we have a
k
b
k
b
n
.
Now let A = {a
n
: n N}. This is clearly non-empty and bounded above
(e.g. by b
1
), so by (P13) there exists a least upper bound, . I claim that I
n
for every n N:
a
n
because is an upper bound on A; and
b
n
because is the least upper bound.
Thus,
n=1
I
n
. In particular, the intersection is nonempty.
(b) (5 points) Let J
n
=
_
a
n
4
n
,
a
n
+ 1
4
n
_
for every n N, where a
n
is dened recursively by
a
1
= 1 and a
n+1
= 4a
n
+ 1. Prove that the set
n=1
J
n
consists of a single real number.
[Hint: you do not need to determine this number or establish an explicit formula for a
n
.]
Ill do this in two steps: rst, Ill show that the intersection is non-empty, and
then Ill show that it cannot contain more than a single element.
To show that the intersection is non-empty, by part (a) it sufces to show that
the intervals J
n
are nested. In other words, we must show that J
n
J
n+1
for
every n N. This is equivalent to proving that
a
n
4
n
a
n+1
4
n+1
and
a
n
+ 1
4
n
a
n+1
+ 1
4
n+1
Neither of these is particularly hard to prove. Heres a proof of the rst one:
a
n+1
4
n+1
=
4a
n
+ 1
4
n+1
=
a
n
4
n
+
1
4
n+1
>
a
n
4
n
.
Onto the second inequality:
a
n+1
+ 1
4
n+1
=
4a
n
+ 1
4
n+1
<
4a
n
+ 4
4
n+1
=
a
n
+ 1
4
n
.
Thus we have shown that the intervals are nested, so by part (a) we conclude
that the intersection is non-empty.
Now pick any two elements c and c
in
n=1
J
n
. Then c, c
J
n
for every n N,
whence |c c
| 4
n
for every n N. This implies that |c c
| = 0 (e.g. by
problem 1(a) of this exam), which in turn is only possible if c = c
. In other
words,
n=1
J
n
cannot contain two different elements. Since we know this set
does contain at least one element, we conclude that it must contain exactly
one element.
continued on page 5
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 5 of 16
(c) (5 points) Recall from part (b) that a
1
= 1 and a
n+1
= 4a
n
+ 1 for every n N. Prove
that
a
n
=
4
n
1
3
n N.
We prove this by induction on n.
Base case: When n = 1, we have
4
1
1
3
= 1, so the claim holds in this case.
n n + 1: Suppose a
n
=
4
n
1
3
for some n N. Then
a
n+1
= 4a
n
+ 1 = 4
4
n
1
3
+ 1 =
4
n+1
4
3
+ 1 =
4
n+1
1
3
.
Thus if the claim holds for n N, it must also hold for n + 1.
By induction, we conclude that the claim holds for all n N.
(d) (5 points) From part (b), you know that
n=1
J
n
consists of a single real number. Deter-
mine this number (with proof).
Combining the result of part (b) with the proof of part (a), we see that we can
write
n=1
J
n
= {} where is the supremum of the set A =
_
a
n
4
n
: n N
_
.
Moreover, from part (c) we know
a
n
4
n
=
1
3
1
3 4
n
.
Claim: = 1/3.
Proof: It is clear that 1/3 is an upper bound of A, so it sufces to show that it
is the least upper bound.
Suppose b is any upper bound of A. This means that b
1
3
1
34
n
for every
n N. It follows that
1
3
b
1
34
n
for every n N. Thus if
1
3
b 0, problem
1(a) implies that
1
3
b = 0. We conclude that
1
3
b 0. This shows that 1/3
is the least upper bound, as claimed.
continued on page 6
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 6 of 16
Page intentionally left blank for scratch work.
continued on page 7
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 7 of 16
(3) (5 points) Suppose that
__
3
2
1
n
, 2
n
_
: n N
_
f
where f is a function. Prove that f is not continuous on [1, 2]. (You may refer to any
theorems covered in lecture or the textbook.)
First, note that 3/2 1/n [1, 2] for all n 2. It follows that for every n 2,
f attains the value 2
n
somewhere in the interval [1, 2]. In particular, f must be
unbounded on this interval. By Theorem 7-2 of Spivak, we conclude that f cannot
be continuous on [1, 2].
(4) (5 points) Explain why the existence of
2 cannot be proved using only (P1)(P12). You
may refer to any theorems proved in lecture or in the textbook (i.e. you may state any
theorems you need without proving them). Your explanation can be quite short, so long as
it is convincing.
All of the properties (P1) (P12) are satised by Q. This means that any theorem
deduced from (P1) (P12) would have to be true in a universe consisting entirely
of rational numbers! And in such a universe
2 wouldnt exist (since we proved
in lecture that
2 Q). Therefore, there cannot possibly be a way to deduce the
existence of
2
< 0 and f(2) =
1
(2)
2
> 0
By Theorem 7-1 of Spivak, we conclude that f has a root in the interval
[, 2].
(b) (3 points) Prove that f(x) has innitely many positive roots.
Note that for any natural number n, we have
f
_
(2n 1)
_
=
1
(2n 1)
2
2
< 0 and f(2n) =
1
(2n)
2
> 0
Thus again by Theorem 7-1, for each n N there exists c
n
[(2n 1), 2n]
such that f(c
n
) = 0.
Finally, I claim the set {c
n
: n N} is innite. It sufces to prove that all
the c
n
s are distinct (because then we have a 1-1 correspondence with N).
Suppose m and n are distinct natural numbers. Without loss of generality,
we may assume that m > n. Then mn 1, whence we have
c
n
2n 2(m1) < (2m1) c
m
.
In other words, weve shown that n < m implies that c
n
< c
m
. In particular,
all the c
n
s must be distinct, so there must be innitely many of them.
continued on page 9
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 9 of 16
(c) (5 points) What is lim
x
f(x)? Give an proof that your answer is correct.
Claim: lim
x
f(x) = 0
Proof: Given > 0. For all x > max
_
1,
2
_
, we have
|f(x) 0| =
sin x
x
+
cos x
x
2
| sin x|
x
+
| cos x|
x
2
by the triangle inequality
1
x
+
1
x
2
1
x
+
1
x
since x > 1 implies that
1
x
< 1
< since x >
2
continued on page 10
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 10 of 16
(6) (a) (5 points) Prove that if a function f is continuous and non-zero at a, then f is non-zero
in a neighbourhood of a.
By denition of continuity, there exists a > 0 such that
|f(x) f(a)| <
|f(a)|
2
for every x (a , a + ). It follows that for all x in this neighbourhood of
a, we have
f(a)
|f(a)|
2
< f(x) < f(a) +
|f(a)|
2
. ()
If f(a) < 0, the upper bound of () shows that f(x) <
f(a)
2
< 0 for every x in
a neighbourhood of a. Similarly, if f(a) > 0, the lower bound of () shows
that f(x) >
f(a)
2
> 0 for every x in a neighbourhood of a. Either way, f(x) is
non-zero for all x (a , a + ).
(b) (5 points) Suppose that a function f is continuous on all of R and satises f(x) = 0 for
all x Q. Prove that f(x) = 0 for all x R.
Suppose f(a) = 0 for some a R. By part (a) there exists > 0 such that
f(x) = 0 for all x (a , a + ). Recall that Q is dense in R, so there must
be a rational point q (a , a + ). But f(q) = 0, which is a contradiction!
Therefore no such a can exist. In other words, f(a) = 0 for every a R.
continued on page 11
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 11 of 16
Page intentionally left blank for scratch work.
continued on page 12
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 12 of 16
(7) (a) (5 points) Prove that
|a| |b|
|a b| for all a, b R.
By triangle inequality, we see that
|a b| +|b| |a|,
which immediately implies that |a| |b| |a b|. It follows (by exchanging
a and b) that |b| |a| |b a|. Since |a b| = |b a|, we conclude.
(b) (5 points) Prove that if f is continuous at a, then |f| is continuous at a.
Given > 0, by denition of continuity there exists > 0 such that
|f(x) f(a)| <
for all x (a , a + ). By part (a), we have
|f(x)| |f(a)|
2
+ 2n
_
= 1 and sin
_
2
+ 2n
_
= 1.
Since sin x is continuous, the IVT guarantees that (for any n Z) there exists
a real number
n
_
2
+ 2n,
2
+ 2n
_
such that sin
n
= y. Now pick n sufciently large (positive or negative) so
that both
1
2
+ 2n
I and
1
2
+ 2n
I
Then
1
n
I as well, and f
_
1
n
_
= y by construction. This shows that every
value between 1 and 1 is attained by f somewhere in [c, d].
continued on page 14
Final Exam MATA31H3 page 14 of 16
(c) (5 points) Let g : R R be dened by
g(x) =
_
_
x if x =
1
4
,
3
4
3
4
if x =
1
4
1
4
if x =
3
4
.
Prove that g is not continuous at 1/4.
To prove this, we must show that lim
x1/4
g(x) = g(1/4). There are several ap-
proaches; perhaps the easiest is to determine the limit.
Claim: lim
x1/4
g(x) = 1/4.
Proof: Given > 0. Then for all x such that
0 < |x 1/4| < min{, 1/4} ()
we have g(x) = x (since () implies that x = 1/4 and x = 3/4). Therefore, for
all x satisfying (),
|g(x) 1/4| = |x 1/4| < .
This concludes the proof.