Early Childhood Development Interventions and Cognitive Development of
Young Children in Rural Vietnam 1 Koichiro Watanabe, 2 Rafael Flores, Junko Fujiwara,* and Lien Thi Huong Tran* Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 and *Save the Children JapanVietnam Ofce, Hanoi, Vietnam ABSTRACT Little is known about the long-term benets of interventions that aim to promote early childhood development programs. The goal of this research was to determine whether an early childhood development intervention added to a nutrition intervention during preschool ages had lasting effects on the cognitive develop- ment of school-age children in communes of Thanh Hoa province in rural Vietnam. The study focused on a total of 313 children aged 6.58.5 y (grades 1 and 2 in primary school) in 2 communes that were exposed to nutrition intervention or nutrition and early childhood development (ECD) intervention from 1999 to 2003. Measurements of height and cognitive test scores (Ravens Progressive Matrices Test) were collected from the children; household characteristics were determined by interviews with mothers. Longitudinal analysis was performed by integrating the data with that collected from the same children in past surveys. Signicant effects of the ECD intervention compared with the nutrition intervention were detected. The benecial effect of ECD intervention on the cognitive test scores was large for the most nutritionally challenged children whose height-for-age Z-scores declined or remained in the stunted range. The ndings help provide useful insights into the development of an effective integrated model of ECD and nutrition intervention for children in rural Vietnam. J. Nutr. 135: 19181925, 2005. KEY WORDS: child development growth nutrition Vietnam In 2004 it was estimated that 162 million preschool chil- dren, or 33% of children 5 y old in developing countries, were stunted [height-for-age Z-scores (HAZ) 3 2] (1). The negative effect of malnutrition on child survival has been well documented. For example, children who are underweight have an 2- to 8-fold higher risk of death than those who are better nourished (2). Malnutrition in early childhood impairs func- tional performance in adulthood; this impairment may be physical as well as cognitive. Economic losses due to the physical and cognitive losses are substantial. Malnutrition in childhood decreases intellectual potential and productivity in adulthood. Furthermore, physical losses in adulthood also have intergenerational effects on child health and nutrition (3). Improving the physical and cognitive development of children in lower-income communities will have far-reaching effects throughout the less-developed world. Effective program de- signs for nutrition and early childhood development need a clearer understanding of their effects on physical and cognitive development. The negative effect of malnutrition on cognitive develop- ment has been demonstrated in multiple locations around the world. Some cross-sectional studies found associations be- tween chronic malnutrition, marked by stunting, and poor cognitive function among school-age children (46). These studies include one in Vietnam, although it did not control for poverty. Other longitudinal studies showed that height-for-age during infancy was strongly associated with cognitive perfor- mance in late childhood (7). The positive effect of nutrition interventions on cognitive development has also been shown. Several supplementation studies suggested the potential for greater cognitive develop- ment through improved nutrition at early ages in populations with endemic undernutrition (814). Although not conclu- sive, it is generally agreed the rst 3 y of life constitute the most vulnerable period, one in which nutritional status is of particular importance (15). Several studies reported evidence of long-lasting benets from early supplementation on cogni- tion when the children reached school age (11,14). The ben- ets of supplementation during early childhood on cognitive development may not be apparent at school age, but they are present by adolescence through interaction between schooling and nutritional improvement (11,16). What is much less documented, less well understood, and thus a subject of considerable, sometimes acrimonious debate, is whether adding an early childhood development (ECD) intervention, dened as preschool-based activities and parent- ing education, to a nutrition intervention in communities in which growth stunting is endemic can improve cognitive performance. Because a majority of the children served by 1 Supported by Joint Japan World Bank Graduate Scholarship Program and Save the Children Japan. Any opinion, ndings, conclusion, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reect the views of the supporting agencies. 2 To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: watanabe@savechildren.or.jp. 3 Abbreviations used: ECD, early childhood development; GEE, generalized estimating equation; GLM, generalized linear model; HAZ, height-for-age Z- score; NERP, nutrition education rehabilitation program; PDI, positive deviance inquiry; WAZ, weight-for-age Z-score. 0022-3166/05 $8.00 2005 American Society for Nutritional Sciences. Manuscript received 7 December 2004. Initial review completed 26 January 2005. Revision accepted 24 May 2005. 1918
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
existing ECD programs in many of the developing countries belong to the age group 12 y away from entry into primary school, the effects of ECD interventions for this age group should be investigated. Hence, the objectives of the present study were to assess the existence of and potential effects of an ECD project during the preschool years (ages 45 y) on the cognitive development of school-age children in rural com- munes in Vietnam where a nutrition project was implemented when the children were 03 y old. We hypothesized that the cognitive development of chil- dren participating in the ECD project would improve more than that of nonparticipating children. Nutritional status and cognitive development of the children are often confounded by the household environment, such as economic conditions, age, and education level of the mothers; these were taken into account in our assessments. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Population and setting. Data from 2000, the most recent data available, showed that the prevalence of stunting (HAZ 2) among children 5 y old in Vietnam was 36% (17). Thanh Hoa province is located in the north central region, where the prevalence of stunting among children 5 y old in 2000 was 40%, among the highest in the country (18). Save the Children Japan implemented a nutrition intervention using Positive Deviance Inquiry (PDI) for 2 y from 1999 to 2000 at 5 communes in Vinh Loc district, Thanh Hoa province, targeting all the children aged 036 mo in the communes. The PDI approach identies successful child-caring practices of poor families who have well-nourished children (19). The intervention communes were se- lected on the basis of 4 criteria set by the implementing organization: high prevalence of child malnutrition, poor socioeconomic condi- tions, absence of prior or current participation in the national nutri- tion program, and the existence of leaders interested in the project. The main components of the nutrition intervention included bi- monthly growth monitoring for all children and 9 sessions of a 12-d nutrition education rehabilitation program (NERP) conducted every month by local health volunteers in their hamlets, targeted for severely malnourished children [weight-for-age Z-score (WAZ) 3]. Approximately half of the families participated in at least 1 NERP session, where they learned nutrition- and health-seeking behaviors and fed the children locally available nutritious foods. In addition, antenatal care services, home gardening, and a savings and credit program were promoted to help strengthen and sustain the nutritional benets. Of the 5 communes, 2 were followed up with an early childhood development (ECD) project for 2 y during 20022003, targeting children of preschool age (45 y old). The 2 communes were selected because they had less access to quality preschool services. Although the majority of the children aged 45 y in the 2 communes attended preschool at baseline, the attendance and the quality of preschool teachers in the 2 communes were lower than those in the other 3 communes. The ECD intervention strengthened existing center- based preschooling through material support and teacher training on child-centered teaching methods. It also supported parental behaviors through 1-d training sessions for fathers and mothers separately every month on 10 different topics concerning child care and development. In addition, the interventions included the establishment of a small local library for parents and promoted play corners in the homes of participating children. Anthropometric measurements of height and weight were col- lected for all of the participating children in 3 surveys conducted in 1999, 2000, and 2001; at that time, mothers were interviewed about their behavior and knowledge of child care. The present study focused on primary school children living in the project communes who were aged 6.58.5 y in 2004 and were exposed directly to 1 or both of the 2 different interventions from 1999 to 2003. Sampling. Two communes were selected as samples for this research and represent the 2 study populations. The rst commune represents those populations exposed only to the nutrition interven- tion; the second commune represents those exposed to both the nutrition intervention and early childhood development. The main selection criteria for the 2 communes were similar socioeconomic conditions and ecologic characteristics. Baseline data on wealth rank- ing, ethnic composition, and ecologic characteristics collected from the district in 1998 were used to identify the sample communes. We studied nearly all of the children (431 of 474) listed in the sampling frame of children aged 6.58.5 y in the 2 communes. The sampling frame was established on the basis of the data collected in past surveys, which were updated by the most recent census records available at the Commune Peoples Committees. The criteria for eligibility for the sampling frame were that the children had been living in the commune since 1998, were currently registered in the same commune, and were between the ages of 6.5 to 8.5 y. Data collection. Standing height was measured to the nearest 1 mm with a standard technique that used the infant/child/adult height measuring board (Shorr Production) (20,21). The survey team was trained in anthropometry standardization exercises conducted by a senior program ofcer of Save the Children Japan, to avoid interob- server measurement bias. Ravens Colored Progressive Matrices test was used to measure the cognitive performance of the children. The test measures the ability to develop new insights and information from what is already per- ceived or known (22). This test was used to assess the cognitive ability of children in several international studies in developing countries such as Guatemala (11), Kenya, Egypt, and Mexico (5). The test generally has had high internal consistency and retest- reliability (0.8); factor analytical studies showed that the test is a good indicator for Spearmans g-factor (23). The standard version of Ravens Progressive Matrices consists of 5 scales (AE), with 12 items in each scale. Each item contains a gure with a missing piece, below which alternative pieces are placed to complete the gure. Each set involves a different principle for obtaining the missing piece; within a set, the items are arranged in increasing order of difculty. Accord- ing to the instructions given by the trainer, Ravens Colored Matrices version was administered. The Colored Matrices version, consisting of 3 scales, Test-A (12 items), Test-B (12 items), and Test-AB (12 items), is designed to assess with greater precision the intellectual processes of young children (22). The same approach was taken in similar research conducted in Guatemala (11). Because the test has not been standardized locally, interpretations of the scores were made only through comparisons of the group mean scores within the study population. Field workers administered the test one-on-one for each individual child, taking 15 min per test per child. A trainer, afliated with the Research and Training Center for Community Development in Hanoi, conducted training on the test methods and use of materials made available by the Center for this research (24). To minimize examiners biases, children were assigned randomly to eld workers, and no information was provided to the eld workers regarding interventions, nutritional status, and socio- economic level of children. The workers were trained repeatedly on skills and attitudes against biases throughout the test administration. The training included trial test administration, which conrmed agreement between the test results obtained by the workers and the trainer. In addition, selected information was gathered on maternal char- acteristics (age, education, number of deliveries, occupation), house- hold characteristics (number of children and family members, pres- ence of grandparents in the household), and childcare (preschooling history) through interviews with mothers, conducted by eld workers in Vietnamese. Data on household monthly income were collected from commune-level secondary data sources. A questionnaire was developed in English, translated into Vietnamese, and pretested in the eld before revisions and completion. The research team consisted of 16 eld surveyors; 4 were assigned exclusively for the Ravens tests and 2 for anthropometric measure- ments. They worked in 2 groups under the supervision of a team leader. Half of the eld workers were recruited for short-term work as main surveyors from universities or nongovernment organizations, whereas the remaining workers were recruited from local partners as assistants to the main surveyors. They had previous experience with data collection in rural Vietnam and were trained in data collection COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAMESE CHILDREN 1919
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
techniques before doing eld work. The eld workers were assigned specic data collection tasks that were xed throughout the duration of the survey to minimize interobserver errors. Data management and analysis. Names and dates of birth of mothers and children were obtained from the demographic record book held in the hamlet and surveys conducted previously in the communes by SC Japan. Then they were cross-checked at registration points in the survey sites, double-checked by eld workers before measurements were taken, and nally checked by the team leader after data collection. All data collection forms were reviewed by the team leader each evening and any discrepancies were discussed. Data collected in the eld survey were entered into EPI Info 2000 (CDC) immediately after collection. The 2 main outcome variables were HAZ and Ravens test scores. Heights were compared with the international National Center for Health Statistics/WHO/CDC reference standards (25) and converted to HAZ using Epi Info 2000. Ravens test scores were calculated by summing total correct answers across the 3 scales. All data were entered into Epi Info 2000 and analyses were performed using SAS 8.0 (SAS Institute) (26). For data analysis, the present datasets were merged with the data of previous surveys, which included weight/height of children at earlier ages, household characteristics, and child feeding/caring prac- tices of mothers. Bivariate analyses were performed using t tests for continuous variables and 2 tests for categorical variables. The gen- eralized linear model (GLM) was used to assess effects of interven- tions on HAZ and Ravens tests scores. Similarly, generalized esti- mating equations (GEEs) were used to assess the effects on proportions. The GLM and GEE models control for potential con- founders to compute adjusted mean scores and proportions of each effect group for comparison. P-values 0.05 were considered signif- icant. Human subjects and ethical considerations. The project was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board before the present research was launched. Written consent was received from parents of the children who voluntarily participated in the research. Field workers were trained in ethical considerations and were under strict orders not to discuss information pertaining to subjects with members of the community or with other non- project-related persons. All of the data collected in the research were kept condential and used only for aggregated data analysis with anonymity. RESULTS Characteristics of subjects. Of the 431children studied, 313 or 73% were matched with baseline data obtained in 1998 to construct a longitudinal data set. The remaining 118 chil- dren were excluded from the data analysis. Main characteris- tics of the studied children did not differ signicantly from those excluded. Characteristics of the 313 study participants are summarized in Table 1; each intervention had similar age and sex structures. Children ranged from 77 to 102 mo of age with group means of 9193. The mean number of children per family was small (1.5) and the majority of mothers had 2 children (95%). Mothers were young (mean age 33 y) and their education level was low; more than one-third had com- pleted only primary school. Farming was the primary occupa- tion of mothers in the communes (9798%); 23% of children lived with their grandparents. Most of the household variables were similar for the 2 interventions. They differed from each other, however, in maternal education (P 0.05), child age (P 0.01), parity (P 0.02), and number of children (P 0.01). The ECD-and-nutrition intervention commune had fewer children per household, they were younger, and their mothers had less education. Those variables were controlled for in multiple variable analyses. At baseline, children in the ECD-and-nutrition interven- tion commune did not differ nutritionally from those in the nutrition-only intervention commune on anthropometric in- dicators measured (Table 2). Some of the key feeding practices as well as prenatal care reported by mothers were poorer for the ECD-and-nutrition commune. Compared with nutrition-only mothers, ECD-and-nutrition mothers were less likely to have had 3 prenatal checks (26 vs. 53%, P 0.01) and started giving complementary food nearly 1 mo earlier (3.9 vs. 4.6 mo, P 0.02). Nutritional status in terms of linear growth at baseline and at the time of the 2004 surveys was compared for all 313 children by GLM and GEE, which detected a signicant decrease in the proportion of stunting over the 5 y from baseline to 2004 for both of the interventions; the adjusted proportions of stunted children (2 HAZ) was reduced by TABLE 1 Characteristics of subjects and their households by study group 1,2 Variable Intervention P-value ECD and nutrition (n 141) Nutrition only (n 172) Age of child, mo 93.4 6.6 90.9 7.3 0.01 Age of mother, y 32.7 5.6 33.3 5.5 0.35 Household income, 3 1000 dong 91 19 89 18 0.55 Household expenditures, 3 1000 dong 447 186 422 198 0.29 Size of family, n 4.7 1.2 4.8 1.1 0.44 Parity, n 2.3 0.8 2.6 1.0 0.02 Male sex, n (%) 74 (52.5) 83 (48.3) 0.46 2 children, n (%) 42 (29.8) 76 (44.2) 0.01 Has a younger sibling, n (%) 32 (23.0) 50 (30.3) 0.15 In 1st grade, n (%) 44 (31.2) 79 (45.9) 0.01 Mothers education primary school, n (%) 67 (48.2) 61 (37.0) 0.05 Mothers occupation, farmer, n (%) 130 (97.0) 160 (97.6) 0.77 Living with grandparents, n (%) 31 (23.0) 38 (23.3) 0.94 Had preschool experience, n (%) 135 (100.0) 160 (99.4) 0.36 1 Values are means SD or n (%). 2 P-values for continuous variables were calculated by Students 2-sided t test. P-values for categorical variables were calculated using Pearsons 2 . 3 1 US$ 16,000 Vietnamese dong. WATANABE ET AL. 1920
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
16% (P 0.01) and 13% (P 0.01) for the ECD-and- nutrition and nutrition-only interventions, respectively (Ta- ble 3). Severe stunting was decreased only for the ECD-and- nutrition children, with a reduction of adjusted proportions 3 HAZ of 7.8% (P 0.01). Overall, children in the ECD-and-nutrition intervention had a slightly larger reduc- tion in the proportion of severe stunting. However, there was no difference in the adjusted mean HAZ scores between the nutrition-only and ECD-and-nutrition intervention com- munes at baseline as well as in the 2004 surveys, indicating no additional effects of ECD interventions on the nutritional status of children. Second, scores on the Ravens tests were modeled with GLM to assess the main effects (Table 4). The results showed that test scores were signicantly higher for the ECD-and- nutrition than for the nutrition-only intervention group (ad- justed mean scores 16.5 vs. 14.9, P 0.05). The difference in the scores was particularly greater among stunted children (adjusted mean scores 16.8 vs. 12.8, P 0.01). Test scores of stunted and nonstunted children differed for the nutrition- only intervention (adjusted mean scores 17.0 vs. 12.8, P 0.01), whereas almost no difference was detected for chil- dren exposed to the nutrition-and-ECD intervention. Additional models were also applied to assess whether initial height, change in height, and their interactions modi- ed the effects (Table 4). Adjusting for initial height did not change the effect, showing that the effects were not biased by the different distributions of stunting at baseline in the 2 groups. Further adjustment for change in height and the in- teractions between the change and initial height slightly re- duced the difference in scores between the interventions (P 0.06). Even after this adjustment, however, the effect of the ECD intervention on cognitive test scores among stunted children remained signicant (P 0.01). Finally, scores on the Ravens tests were modeled with GLM to compare how changes in the nutritional status of children from baseline to 2004 affected cognitive test scores between the 2 interventions (Table 5). Nutritional status at baseline and in 2004 were cross-tabulated to form 4 groups: drop (HAZ dropped from 2 to 2), remained stunted (HAZ stayed 2), never stunted (HAZ stayed 2), and catch up (HAZ improved from 2 to 2). Adjusted differences in cognitive test scores between the groups were detected only for the nutrition-only intervention (P 0.0010.06). Mean scores from the 4 groups (Fig. 1) illustrate the dose-response relation between the change in nutritional status over time and cognitive test scores for the nutrition-only intervention commune, which was not present for the ECD-and-nutrition intervention. DISCUSSION This study examined the effects of an early childhood development project for children aged 45 y on the cognitive TABLE 2 Nutritional status and key maternal behaviors at baseline and 2000 surveys in school-aged children previously exposed to ECD-and-nutrition or nutrition-only intervention 1,2 Variable Intervention P-value ECD and nutrition (n 141) Nutrition only (n 172) WAZ 1.93 0.84 1.89 0.77 0.68 HAZ 1.59 1.22 1.54 0.98 0.70 WHZ 3 1.19 0.75 1.20 0.69 0.88 Underweight (WAZ 2), n (%) 70 (49.7) 81 (47.1) 0.65 Stunting (HAZ 2), n (%) 53 (37.6) 54 (31.4) 0.25 Wasting (WHZ 2), n (%) 16 (11.4) 19 (11.1) 0.93 Premature birth, n (%) 11 (7.9) 15 (9.1) 0.71 Smaller at birth, n (%) 62 (44.6) 60 (36.4) 0.14 3 antenatal care visits, n (%) 36 (25.5) 91 (52.9) 0.01 Stop breast-feeding, mo 17.7 4.8 18.6 6.7 0.16 Start complementary feeding, mo 3.9 1.9 4.6 3.1 0.02 Participation in NREP, n (%) 62 (44.6) 91 (55.2) 0.07 Participation in growth monitoring, within 3 mo, n (%) 97 (71.3) 87 (54.7) 0.01 1 Values are means SD or n (%). 2 P-values for continuous variables were calculated by Students 2-sided t test. P-values for categorical variables were calculated using Pearsons 2 . 3 WHZ, weight-for-height Z-score. TABLE 3 Anthropometric status of children exposed to ECD-and-nutrition or nutrition-only intervention, at the 2004 survey and change over 5 y 1 Variable Intervention Difference 2 ECD and nutrition (n 141) Nutrition only (n 172) P-value 2004 Mean HAZ 1.42 0.74 1.36 0.83 0.12 0.18 % 2 HAZ 21.3 18.0 4.8 0.30 % 3 HAZ 0.7 4.1 3.1 0.19 Change 3 Mean HAZ 0.17 1.00 0.18 0.84 (% 2 HAZ) 16.3* 13.4* (% 3 HAZ) 7.8* 1.2 1 Values are means SD or %. 2 Differences between interventions were adjusted for initial height at baseline, household income, and age of the child. P-values were calculated using the GLM for continuous variables and GEE for pro- portions. 3 Change between baseline and 2004. P-values were calculated using McNemars tests. * Different from baseline, P 0.05. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAMESE CHILDREN 1921
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
development of the children who were previously exposed to a nutrition intervention at the age of 03 y. We collected measurements of heights and cognitive test scores of children when they reached school age in the 2 intervention communes in rural Vietnam. Overall, children exposed to Save the Chil- drens ECD interventions had signicantly better scores on Ravens progressive matrix tests than their counterparts who experienced only nutrition intervention. Effects were particu- larly large for currently malnourished children. Overall, the current level of stunting among school-age children who were exposed to the Save the Childrens nutri- tion program was 20% in terms of the proportion of children 2 HAZ. Age-specic nutrition status by height-for-age is not available for this age group in Vietnam. A recent national survey reported the prevalence of undernutrition among chil- dren 610 y old as 27% nationally and 28% for rural regions (27). Although these data provide only an overview, it could be argued that nutritional improvement has occurred in these TABLE 4 Mean Ravens test scores of children exposed to ECD-and-nutrition or nutrition-only intervention, by current nutritional status 1 Variable Intervention Difference ECD and nutrition Nutrition only n Score n Score Unadjusted All 141 16.6 5.4 170 16.1 6.1 Normal 2 111 16.7 4.9 140 17.0 5.5 Stunted 3 30 16.1 7.2 30 11.8 6.9 Adjusted for confounders 4 All 128 16.46 0.58 152 14.91 0.56 1.55* Normal 101 16.10 0.53 124 17.03 0.48 a 0.93 Stunted 27 16.82 1.03 28 12.80 1.02 b 4.03* Adjusted for initial height 5 All 128 16.62 0.59 152 15.08 0.57 1.54* Normal 101 15.96 0.54 124 16.96 0.48 a 1.01 Stunted 27 17.28 1.07 28 13.20 1.05 b 4.08* Adjusted for initial height and change in height 6 All 128 16.68 0.60 152 15.17 0.61 1.51 Normal 101 15.91 0.55 124 16.91 0.50 a 1.00 Stunted 27 17.44 1.14 28 13.43 1.19 b 4.01* 1 Values are means SD for unadjusted data and SEM for adjusted data. * Different between the interventions, P 0.05. 2 HAZ 2. 3 HAZ 2. 4 PROC GLM was applied to compute least-squares means for different interventions, adjusted for household income, maternal education, childs age, and the presence of grandparents. Means in a column without a common letter differ, P 0.05. 5 Adjusting for initial height in addition to 4. 6 Adjusting for change in height from baseline to 2004 and its interaction with initial height, in addition to 5. TABLE 5 Mean difference in Ravens test scores of groups by nutritional status change in school-aged children previously exposed to ECD-and-nutrition or nutrition-only intervention Variable Intervention ECD and nutrition Nutrition only n Coefcient 1 SE 95% CI n Coefcient 1 SE 95% CI Unadjusted (reference group catch up) Drop 6 0.35 2.53 (4.63, 5.33) 8 7.78* 2.23 (12.12, 3.39) Remained stunted 24 0.73 1.56 (2.34, 3.79) 22 5.88* 1.56 (8.96, 2.81) Never stunted 82 1.63 1.22 (0.77, 4.03) 108 1.54 1.14 (3.77, 0.70) Catch up 29 32 Adjusted 2 (reference group catch up) Drop 4 1.03 2.85 (6.65, 4.59) 8 7.16* 1.56 (11.43, 2.90) Remained stunted 23 1.53 1.52 (1.46, 4.52) 20 5.40* 1.15 (8.46, 2.34) Never stunted 75 0.62 1.22 (1.78, 3.01) 96 2.15 2.85 (4.42, 0.11) Catch up 26 28 1 Coefcients from linear regression models in which the Ravens test score is the dependent variable; coefcients represent the mean decit in the Ravens test score relative to the reference group. * Different from the reference, P 0.05. 2 PROC GLM was applied, adjusted for household income, maternal education, childs age, and the presence of grandparents. WATANABE ET AL. 1922
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
communes. The difference was not signicant, however, be- tween the 2 communes in terms of the amount of change over time in mean HAZ scores. Those results indicate that there were no additional effects of ECD interventions on the nutri- tional status of children. With the nutritional improvement program, the nutritional change among children exposed to nutrition-only interven- tions had a linear association with cognitive development. This nding, consistent with other studies that detected sig- nicant associations between cognitive performance among school-age children and their current or early nutritional sta- tus (57,11), suggests that continuing malnutrition is detri- mental to the cognitive development of children. Children exposed to Save the Childrens ECD interven- tions had signicantly better test scores than their counter- parts who experienced only the nutrition intervention. Differ- ences in test scores between stunted and nonstunted children were minimal among children who had ECD interventions, whereas they were signicantly larger in the nutrition-only intervention commune in which better-nourished children had higher scores than malnourished children. Signicant effects of the ECD intervention were thus most noticeable for currently malnourished children whose test scores were signif- icantly higher than similarly malnourished children who were exposed only to the nutrition intervention. Furthermore, additional analyses controlling for initial height, change in height over time, and their interactions did not alter the ndings without the adjustments, suggesting that the effect of the ECD intervention was separate from the effects on physical growth. All of this evidence supports the protective effect of ECD intervention against the negative cognitive effects of growth failure; it is possible that the effects of Save the Childrens ECD intervention compensated for the loss caused by poor physical growth in the earlier years. Reviews of early childhood development programs for chil- dren in low-income families in the United States reported evidence that the programs produced large effects on IQ dur- ing the early childhood years and sizable persistent effects on school achievement (28). Those included longitudinal studies, which found signicant positive effects on IQ scores (29,30), achievement test scores (2932), school repetition (29,32), attendance (33), and special education (2931). For popula- tions in developing countries with endemic undernutrition, many studies assessed the effects of food supplementation on the cognitive development of children. In contrast, very few examined the additional effects of psychological stimulation. A longitudinal study in Cali, Colombia assessed the effects of integrated interventions of varying duration, consisting of nutrition supplementation, health care, and an early education program, on the cognitive development of preschool children aged 4284 mo who were chronically malnourished. The results showed that nutrition supplementation alone before initiation of the preschool program had no effect on psycho- logical development measured by various intellectual ability tests at several ages from 4 to 7 y, whereas the combined interventions of nutrition and early education had larger ef- fects if they were started earlier and lasted longer (34). The study design, however, did not allow us to compare the effects of nutrition supplementation alone with the combined inter- ventions of supplementation and stimulation. Another study in Bogota, Colombia compared the effects of supplementation only, stimulation only, supplementation and stimulation, and no intervention on cognitive development of children aged 036 mo. It detected clear effects of nutrition supplementa- tion on the cognitive performance of children as measured by the Grifth test. However, no added benets of psychological stimulation were found (12). Evidence concurrent with this studys ndings was provided by a study of stunted Jamaican children, aged 924 mo, who were randomly assigned to nutrition-only, stimulation-only, nutrition-and-stimulation, and control groups (10) After the 2-y intervention, the benets from a combination of supple- mentation and stimulation were additive, and the children receiving both treatments caught up to the nonstunted control group in developmental levels. A follow-up study of those children at 7 y of age showed small, but signicant, global benets of the interventions (9). That study indicated a plau- sible mechanism that the lower activity levels of undernour- ished children may not affect their development when they are in a stimulating environment. The greater effect of the combined interventions in im- proving both physical growth and psychological development than the effect of either one alone may be explained by their interactions at 3 different critical points: at the child level, between the child and his or her family or caregivers, and in the design and delivery of programs (35). At the level of the child, the negative cognitive effects of growth failure were evident, as shown in the nutrition-only commune in this study, which was protected by exposure to the ECD interven- tion. Psychosocial stimulation programs, although improving cognition, would also have positively affected physical growth (36), which was not detected in this study. This was possibly due to the late timing of the ECD intervention (ages of 45 y). Effective timing and duration of ECD interventions warrant further investigation. As illustrated by similar studies in Co- lombia (32), the effects of psychological stimulations were larger if the interventions were applied earlier and for a longer period. A follow-up study on younger children aged 03 y at the time of this study, who were exposed to the ECD inter- vention at younger ages and for a longer period, may provide useful insights. At the level of interaction between child and caregivers, better-nourished children tend to be more active and explor- atory and more able to elicit parental interaction. ECD inter- FIGURE 1 Mean test scores by change in nutritional status be- tween baseline and 2004 in school-aged children previously exposed to nutrition-only intervention or nutrition-and-ECD intervention. Values are means and SEM, n 313. The 4 groups are dened as follows: 1) Drop HAZ 2 at baseline and 2 in 2004, 2) Stunt HAZ 2 at baseline and in 2004, 3) Norm HAZ 2 at baseline and in 2004; 4) Up HAZ 2 at baseline and 2 in 2004. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAMESE CHILDREN 1923
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
vention may have stimulated parents to acquire more respon- sive behaviors toward malnourished children than parents with nutrition-only intervention. This study, however, cannot provide information to further examine the critical points due to lack of data on parental behaviors and child-parent inter- actions. It is of interest to determine which components of the ECD interventions worked most effectively on child-parent interactions. The ECD interventions combined the center- based approach with the parental support component, which cannot be separated in this study design. The preschool-based activities could have stimulated active learning and social interactions between the child and his or her environment, and the parental education component may have enhanced parents knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding child care at home. The nonverbal cognitive ability measured by Ravens Col- ored Progressive Matrices test is dened as eductive, which refers to the ability to make meaning out of confusion. It is not within the scope of this study to detail the interpretation beyond the one summarized by Raven that eductive ability, compared with other cognitive abilities, is promoted when parents involve their children in their own attempts to make sense of difcult situations (37). This aspect of ability has relevance in assessing effects of ECD interventions. However, we can by no means assume that Ravens progressive matrix is the single best tool with which to assess cognitive develop- ment in rural Vietnam. It would have been preferable to perform several other tests that have been used for different purposes in studies measuring childrens cognitive perfor- mance. School test scores and teacher ratings were of partic- ular interest because the effect is modied by access and quality of education at preschool and primary schools. Never- theless, the study provided a unique example of the utility of Ravens tests in assessing the cognitive development of chil- dren in developing countries. We acknowledge several other limitations to this study in addition to the points raised above. Unlike intervention trials using direct high-energy food supplementation or intensive provision of psychological stimulation, this study involved interventions designed for a real-life project with a primary focus on behavioral changes in feeding and child-care prac- tices by parents as well as the community. The absence of data on the key behavioral factors did not allow us to investigate intermediate variables. If the Ravens test had been conducted at baseline, it would have provided stronger evidence that the differences could be attributed to the ECD intervention. Larger samples randomly selected from the entire project com- munes would have provided a statistically more valid estima- tion of measurements. Measurements of potential confounders, particularly regarding educational opportunities available for children and mothers, would have helped to better explain study outcomes and interpretations. The optimal study design was beyond the resources of this study. In summary, this study documented evidence that during a period of nutritional change, children who failed to catch up in linear growth are likely to lose the opportunity for cognitive betterment in the early primary school years if appropriate interventions are not given. The ndings suggest that early childhood program interventions for preschool-age children (45 y) increase the potential for cognitive development, particularly for malnourished children, whose growth failure prevents proper cognitive development. All of these ndings support the importance of an integrated program of nutrition and ECD to optimize the potential for holistic development of children in an equitable manner. The Government of Vietnam, in collaboration with inter- national donors, has initiated efforts to develop an effective integrated model of ECD and nutrition for preschool children. Save the Children is expanding its ECD program to have a wider scope with particular focus on the northern mountain- ous regions where people belonging to an ethnic minority live. These regions have fallen behind during the current trend of widening regional disparity, and children there suffer from chronic poverty and inferior access to health and education services, as well as food insecurity. Such a context allows these disadvantaged children to lose their chance for physical and intellectual development. It is here that the contributions from nutrition and ECD programs are expected to be most important. It is recommended, therefore, that the effects of the integrated nutrition and ECD interventions be examined fur- ther through community intervention trials. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank the following people who contributed to the success of this study: eld survey team members of Save the Children JapanVietnam Ofce, who participated in the data collection; Tuan Tran, Thach Duc Tran, and Van Ha of Research and Training Center for Community Development, who provided training and tools for the Ravens tests and other technical assistance. LITERATURE CITED 1. The United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition (2004) The 5th Report on the World Nutrition Situation. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 2. Black, R. E., Morris, S. S. & Bryce, J. (2003) Where and why are 10 million children dying every year? The Lancet 361: 22262234. 3. The United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition (1992) The 2nd Report on the World Nutrition Situation, Vol. I. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Hall, A., Khanh, L. N., Son, T. H., Dung, N. Q., Lansdown, R. G., Dar, D. T., Hanh, N. T., Moestue, H., Kho, H. H. & Bundy, D. A. (2001) An association between chronic undernutrition and educational test scores in Vietnamese chil- dren. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 55: 801804. 5. Sigman, M., Neumann, C., Jansen, A. A. & Bwibbo, N. (1989) Cogni- tive abilities of Kenyan children in relation to nutrition, family characteristics, and education. Child Dev. 60: 14631474. 6. Moock, P. R. & Leslie, J. (1986) Childhood malnutrition and schooling in the Terai region of Nepal. J. Dev. Econ. 20: 3352. 7. Mendez, M. A. & Adair, L. S. (1999) Severity and timing of stunting in the rst two years of life affect performance on cognitive tests in late childhood. J. Nutr. 129: 15551562. 8. Freeman, H. E., Klein, R. E., Townsend, J. W. & Lechtig, A. (1980) Nutrition and cognitive development among rural Guatemalan children. Am. J. Public Health 70: 12771285. 9. Grantham-McGregor, S. M., Walker, S. P., Chang, S. M. & Powell, C. A. (1997) Effects of early childhood supplementation with and without stimulation on later development in stunted Jamaican children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66: 247 253. 10. Grantham McGregor, S. M., Powell, C. A., Walker, S. P. & Himes, J. H. (1991) Nutritional supplementation, psychosocial stimulation, and mental devel- opment of stunted children: the Jamaican Study. Lancet 338: 15. 11. Pollitt, E., Gorman, K. S., Engle, P. L., Martorell, R. & Rivera, J. (1993) Early supplementary feeding and cognition. Monogr. Soc. Child Dev. 58: 1102. 12. Waber, D. P., Vuori-Christiansen, L., Ortiz, N., Clement, J. R., Chris- tiansen, N. E., Mora, J. O., Reed, R. B. & Hererra, M. G. (1981) Nutritional supplementation, maternal education and cognitive development of infant at risk of malnutrition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 34: 807813. 13. Chavez, A., Martinez, C., Soberanes, B., Dominguez, L. & Avila, A. (1994) Early Nutrition and Physical and Mental Development in Mexican Rural Adolescent Families. International Center for Research on Women, Washington, DC. 14. Pollitt, E., Watkins, W. E. & Husaini, M. A. (1997) Three-month nutri- tional supplementation in Indonesian infants and toddlers benets memory func- tion 8 y later. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66: 13571363. 15. Grantham-Macgregor, S. M., Fernald, L. C. & Sethuranman, K. (1999) Effect of health and nutrition on cognitive development in children in the rst years of life. Food Nutr. Bull. 20: 5375. 16. Li, H., Barnhart, H. X., Stein, A. D. & Martorell, R. (2003) Effects of early childhood supplementation on the educational achievement of women. Pediatrics 112: 11561152. 17. General Statistic Ofce and Vietnam Committee for Protection and Care for Children (2000) Analysis of Result of Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey II. General Statistic Ofce of Vietnam, Hanoi, Vietnam. WATANABE ET AL. 1924
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d
f r o m
18. National Institute of Nutrition & UNICEF (2003) Vietnam 20002002: A Review of the Nutrition Situation. National Institute of Nutrition and UNICEF, Hanoi, Vietnam. 19. Sternin, M., Sternin, J. & Marsh, D. (1998) Designing a Community- Based Nutrition Program Using the Hearth Model and the Positive Deviance ApproachA Field Guide. Save the Children, Westport, CT. 20. United Nations (1986) How To Weigh and Measure Children: Assess- ing the Nutritional Status of Young Children in Household Surveys. Department of Technical Cooperation for Development and Statistical Ofce, New York, NY. 21. Infant/child/adult height measuring board [Online]. Shorr Productions. http://www.shorrproductions.com [accessed December 4, 2004]. 22. Ravens Colored Progressive Matrices [Online]. Campbell Thomson & McLaughlin Ltd. http://www.jcravenltd.com/applications.htm [accessed Decem- ber 4, 2004]. 23. Court, J. H. & Raven, J. (1995) Manual for Ravens Progressive Ma- trices and Vocabulary Scales. Oxford Psychologists Press, San Antonio, TX. 24. Attawell, K. (2003) International Longitudinal Research on Childhood Poverty: Practical Guidelines and Lessons Learnt from Young Lives. Young Lives, London, UK. 25. World Health Organization (1995) Physical Status: The Use and Inter- pretation of Anthropometry: Report of a WHO Expert Committee. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 26. SAS 8.0 [Online]. SAS Institute Inc. http://www.sas.com [accessed De- cember 4, 2004]. 27. National Institute of Nutrition (2003) 2000 General Nutrition Survey. Medical Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam. 28. Barnett, W. S. (1995) Long-term effects of early childhood programs of cognitive and school outcomes. The Future of Children 5: 2550. 29. Campbell, F. A. & Ramey, C. T. (1994) Effects of early intervention on intellectual and academic achievement: a follow-up study of children from low- income families. Child Dev. 65: 684698. 30. Levenstein, P., OHara, J. & Madden, J. The Mother-Child Home Program of the Verbal Interaction Project. In: As the Twig Is Bent: Lasting Effects of Preschool Programs (Consortium for Longitudinal Studies), pp. 237263. Erl- baum, Hillsdale, NJ. 31. Jester, R. E. & Guinagh, B. J. (1983) The Gordon Parent Education Infant and Toddler Program. In: As the Twig Is Bent: Lasting Effects of Preschool Programs (Consortium for Longitudinal Studies), pp. 103132. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 32. Palmer, F. (1983) The Harlem Study: effects by type of training, age of training, and social class. In: As the Twig Is Bent: Lasting Effects of Preschool Programs (Consortium for Longitudinal Studies), pp. 201236. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 33. Seitz, V., Rosenbaum, L. K. & Apfel, N. H. (1985) Effects of family support intervention: a ten-year follow-up. Child Dev. 56: 376391. 34. Mckay, H., Sinisterra, L., Mckay, A., Gomez, H. & Lloreda, P. (1978) Improving cognitive ability in chronically deprived children. Science (Washington, DC) 200: 270278. 35. World Health Organization (1999) A Critical Link: Interventions for Physical Growth and Psychological Development. Department of Child and Ad- olescent Health and Development. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. 36. Super, C. M., Herrera, M. A. & Mora, J. O. (1990) Long term effects of food supplementation and psychosocial intervention on the physical growth of Colombian infants at risk of malnutrition. Child Dev. 61: 2949. 37. Raven, J. (2000) The Ravens Progressive Matrices: change and sta- bility over culture and time. Cognit. Psychol. 41: 148. COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT OF VIETNAMESE CHILDREN 1925
b y
g u e s t
o n
M a y
2 2 ,
2 0 1 2 j n . n u t r i t i o n . o r g D o w n l o a d e d