Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Attorney at Law
466 Bloomfield Ave., Suite 200
Newark, NJ 07107
Name: CARMELA FLORES, MARIA
U.S. Department of Justice
Executive Ofce fr Immigration Review
Board of Immigration Appeals
Ofce of the Clerk
5107 leesburg Pike. Suite 2000
Fall s Church. Vrginia 20530
OHS/ICE Office of Chief Counsel - NYC
26 Federal Plaza, 11th Floor
New York, NY 10278
A 205-136-055
Date of this notice: 6/19/2014
Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-refrenced case.
Enclosure
Panel Members:
Adkins-Blanch, Charles K.
Manuel, Elise
Guendelsberger, John
Sincerely,
|o t
Donna Car
Chief Clerk
schwirzA
Useream: Docket
For more unpublished BIA decisions, visit www.irac.net/unpublished
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
&
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
|
w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Maria Carmela Flores, A205 136 055 (BIA June 19, 2014)
I
'
U.S. Depaent of Justice
Exe Oc for Imgton Rew
Dson o t Bd o Imgon A
FalCu Via 20530
File: A205 136 055 - Ne York N Date:
JUN 19
2014
I re: MA CA .A FORS a.k.a. M Caela Aas Flore
I RMOVAL PROCEEDIGS
APPEAL
ON BEHAF OF RSPONENT: Pasuale F. Ganet Esuie
APLICATION: Reopening
The respondent, a native and citien of El Salvador, was ordeed removed in absena on
Ocobe 19, 2012. On November 20, 2012, the respondent fled a moton to repe procdins,
which the Imigaton Judge dee on Jaua 11, 2013. The respondent fled a timely appeal
of t decision. Te appeal will be sustne, proceedings will be reopened and the rord wll
be remanded.
The Immigaton Judge denied the respondent's motion to repe fnding tat she fale t
eslish ection circsacs for her falure to appe at the hearing. Howeer, upon
review, we fnd t the toti of circumstaces presnte in this cse constitte exceptonal
crcmsace fr the respondent's falue to apper a he hering. Section 240(e)(l) of the Ac;
8 U.S.C. 1229(e)(l). The respondent's failure to appea was inadveent ad the result of a
good faith misae aising fom the loss of he heing notce durin a move and misinforaton
fom her cousel's ofce rather ta a atempt t avoid a heain. See, e.g., Singh v. IS, 295
F.3d 1037 (9t Ci. 2002)( the Cour fud exceptiona circumstaes were present were the
alien msunderstood te heng time ad could have presented a valid clam fr relief fom
deporaon). Acordingly, we will allow the respondent aother oppornity to appear fr a
heng.
ORER: The appeal is susained, the i absenta order is rescinded, the proceedings are
reopened, ad the recrd is remande to the Immigaton Judge fr fher proceeings.
FOR T BOA
I
m
m
i
g
r
a
n
t
&
R
e
f
u
g
e
e
A
p
p
e
l
l
a
t
e
C
e
n
t
e
r
|
w
w
w
.
i
r
a
c
.
n
e
t
Cite as: Maria Carmela Flores, A205 136 055 (BIA June 19, 2014)
I t
t. J.. -
r
In the Matter of: