0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
45 просмотров18 страниц
Impacts of adverse effects of climate change to farming communities can be reduced by availing climate forecasts to farmers. The needs and demand for climate information vary according to the production systems and hence the usability of forecasts depends on the characteristics of the farmers. Downscaling seasonal forecasts promises to deliver benefits of seasonal forecasts for smallholder farmers in the semi arid, districts of kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo in Kenya.
Impacts of adverse effects of climate change to farming communities can be reduced by availing climate forecasts to farmers. The needs and demand for climate information vary according to the production systems and hence the usability of forecasts depends on the characteristics of the farmers. Downscaling seasonal forecasts promises to deliver benefits of seasonal forecasts for smallholder farmers in the semi arid, districts of kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo in Kenya.
Impacts of adverse effects of climate change to farming communities can be reduced by availing climate forecasts to farmers. The needs and demand for climate information vary according to the production systems and hence the usability of forecasts depends on the characteristics of the farmers. Downscaling seasonal forecasts promises to deliver benefits of seasonal forecasts for smallholder farmers in the semi arid, districts of kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo in Kenya.
TITLE: Effects of Seasonal Forecasts on Farm Decision Making for Small Holder
Farming systems in Semi Arid Parts of Kenya
Authors *W N Githungo a , R G Kinuthia b , K Kizito c , KPC Rao d
AFFILIATION INSTITUTIONS Kenya Meteorological Department a Email: william_ndegwa@yahoo.com
University of Nairobi b email: rgkinuthia@gmail.com;
Kenya Agricultural Research Institute c email: kwenakizito@yahoo.com
International Centre for Research in Semi Arid Tropics ICRISAT d email:
k.p.rao@cgiar.org
ABSTRACT Impacts of adverse effects of climate change to farming communities can be reduced by availing climate forecasts to farmers to enable making of informed farming decision and adaptation. The needs and demand for climate information vary according to the production systems and hence the usability of forecasts depends on the characteristics of the farmers and their geographical location. Meteorological services in the Greater Horn of Africa (GHA) region issue seasonal climate forecasts on regular basis as part of their operations. The lack of a comprehensive profile of users of the forecast has left a gap between the information that is useful to farmers and what is actually provided for public consumption. Difficulties in interpreting and applying the forecasts include, mismatch between the variables in the forecasts and the operational needs of farmers and simple lack of comprehending what is entailed in the forecasts. Downscaling seasonal forecasts to local scales, promises to deliver benefits of seasonal forecasts for smallholder farmers in the semi arid, districts of Kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo in Kenya for improved on-farm decision-making. Key Words: climate, downscale, information, farming, decision-making
1 INTRODUCTION Seasonal climate forecasting can increase preparedness and lead to better social, economic and environmental outcomes within agricultural production systems,. The production of rain- fed crops in semi-arid tropics exhibits large variation in response to the variability in seasonal rainfall. There are several farm-level decisions such as the choice of cropping pattern, whether to invest in fertilizers, pesticides, the choice of the period for planting, plant population density for which the appropriate choice (associated with maximum production or minimum risk) depends upon the nature of the rainfall variability or the prediction of climatic variables for a specific year. The purpose of this paper is to describe the framework used by a team of researchers implementing the research project Managing risk, reducing vulnerability and enhancing agricultural productivity under a changing climate to assess the potential in the use of downscaled climate forecasts in agricultural decision-making and to summarize what was learned in the research process. Climate forecasting is one of many risk management tools that play an important role in agriculture decision-making. Agrawala et al. (2001) has decried the fact that only a few examples of seasonal climate forecasts are being used successfully by vulnerable groups, despite international efforts to improve societal responses. OBrien et al. (2000) has indicated that one of the primary reasons for this scenario is that forecast information does not specifically target vulnerable groups, which results in poor availability of information and therefore a barrier to ease of access to the information. The forecast information is often not tailored to suit target farmers in content and delivery style, which means that they may end up not being able to access it even if it was availed to them (Patt, 2001; Broad et al., 2002). In the Greater Horn of Africa (GHA), region, seasonal climate forecasts are more widely available at present than they were a decade ago. Dialogue between producers of information, researchers and different categories of decision makers has been enhanced by outreach activities through the GHA Climate Outlook Forums (GHACOF) and the Kenya Meteorological Departments awareness and sensitization services. However, gaps still exist between information provided and specific information desired by decision makers. The challenge eliminating this gap rests with both the providers of information, who do not always understand the users needs, and users of the seasonal predictions, whose capacity for interpretation and comprehension of the forecasts is low. Despite the availability of relatively reliable forecasts from the Kenya Meteorological Department, farmers seldom use this information for farm level decision- making (Hansen, 2002; Hammer et al., 2001,). This is mainly due to lack of adaptability of the information to the local needs and difficult in accessing the information on time and in a format that farmers can easily understand. This gap is mainly caused by lack of capacity for interpretation and use of the forecasts (Hansen et al, 2009). Providing location specific and easy to understand climate forecasts can therefore enhance farmers capacity to use climate forecasts to manage risk. Downscaled and location-specific forecasts may assist small holder farmers in taking proper decisions at the farm level.
2 OBJECTIVES The broad objective of the project was to develop an effective method for communicating seasonal climate forecast information to small scale farmers. Specific objectives include: (i) To enhance farmers knowledge on available climate information and their ability to anticipate extreme climate events; (ii) To enhance farmers capacity for observing climatic parameters and their use in guiding farm activities; and (iii) To build farmers capacity to interpret probabilistic seasonal forecasts for purposes of on-farm decision making. 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 3.1 Traditional Strategies to Manage Climatic Risk From historic time, to date, the climatic considerations have always remained key to the settlement patterns and development trend of humankind. Throughout human history, societies have expected seasonal changes similar to the local historical averages and a certain amount of variation around these averages, but, despite their efforts to forecast these variations, they have not typically counted on much skill in predicting them. Thus, they have conditioned themselves to expect climatic surprises and only hope to to deal with the impacts reactively. The newly developed scientific skill in climate forecasting may fundamentally change the ways social systems cope with or react to climatic variation by reducing the magnitude or frequency of climatic surprises through provision of forecast information that enable adequate lead time to prepare for climatic events.
Climate variability has a major influence on agricultural production in smallholder farming systems of Kenya. Most communities in arid and semi arid parts of Kenya are predominantly agro-pastoralists and climatic variability has a direct bearing on their livelihood support opportunities with rainfall being the most important climate parameter. Over the years, smallholder farmers in Kenya had their climate monitoring methods, which were passed on from generation to another generation Nyakwada et al., (2003). The indicators used for prediction included the environment around them such as plants, birds, animals, insects, stars, the moon, winds, clouds, lightning patterns and heat and humidity. Indigenous knowledge and tradition still play a role in climate risk management in Kenya. Farmers in Ukambani community (Kitui, Mwingi, Machakos, and Makueni) of Kenya, where the project is being implemented, have indicated up to twenty (20) rainfall indicators used at different stages of any given rainfall season. Detailed explanations of various seasonal indicators among various Kenyan communities are well documented by Nyakwada et al., (2003). 3.2 Seasonal Climate Forecasts Growing understanding of ocean-atmosphere interactions and advances in modeling the global climate systems now provide a usable degree of predictability of climate several months in advance for many parts of the world (Goddard et al. 2001). Combined with the ability to systematically quantify agricultural management responses via simulation analysis, the enhanced understanding and modeling of climate issues offers an opportunity to improve climate risk management (Meinke and Stone 2004). Integrating seasonal climate forecasting with agricultural system analysis can increase its effectiveness (Hammer et al. 2000; Meinke et al. 2001). The recent improvement of seasonal climate forecasts has meant that forecasts on how much rain to expect over the season, and predictions of seasonal variability of rainfall are now widely available. The seasonal forecast is based on the fact that lower-boundary forcing, measured by sea surface temperatures, drives future atmospheric perturbations (Murphy et al. 2001). These boundary conditions evolve slowly and so enable predictions of rainfall to be made (Palmer and Anderson 1994). Seasonal forecasts are probabilistic Fig 1 and rainfall is often forecasted as the chance of being above normal, below normal or near normal. The normal amount of rainfall is the middle third (tercile) of the average rainfall for the past number of years of rainfall data used to develop the forecast. The forecast is usually issued for a period of one to three months and suggests the probability of a given amount of rainfall expected over that period. The forecast gives an indication of date of onset and cessation of rain. The forecast however does not give much weight to the temporal distribution, such that if the amount of rainfall forecast were to fall over a few days, the seasonal forecast would still be correct but the impact could be catastrophic (Agrawala et al. 2001). It is this probabilistic nature that needs to be given attention in dissemination of forecast information so that farmers do not assume it to be deterministic. In the agricultural sector, forecasts have provided information for agricultural decisions relating to dryland farming, irrigated farming and livestock management (Marshall et al. 1996; Hammer et al., 2000). The types of decisions making that seasonal forecasts can support include both operational short-term decisions, and tactical and strategic longer-term decisions. A strategic decision for smallholder farmers might be to maximize total crop yield. The accompanying operational decision might involve deciding what variety of crop to plant in order to achieve maximum yields. A forecast for below-normal rainfall could encourage drought-resistant seeds to be planted instead of long-maturing varieties that require more moisture and might fail completely without adequate moisture. If the forecast provides better than best-guess information about the rainfall in the succeeding season, it allows better decision making and maximization of conditions (Walker et al. 2001). The opportunity to manage variation is a strength of seasonal forecasts that is just as important as decreasing negative impacts of climatic variability. The most useful forecast information, according to the farmers, are the early warning on anticipated poor season, the commencement of the season and adequacy of anticipated rains (Phillips et al, 2001). It is probable for people living in low rainfall zones that seasonal forecasts for wetter years are of greater value than warnings of a poor season (Phillips, 1998). Above all the forecast should be stated and presented in a language and in terms that the target end users understand Unganai (2000)
3.3 Current State of Seasonal Climate Forecasts in Kenya The seasonal forecast issued by the Kenya Meteorological Department is based on the consensus seasonal rainfall forecast developed by ICPAC. The forecast is based on considerations of the prevailing atmospheric-oceanic conditions and an ensemble of seasonal climate forecasts generated by leading global climate prediction centres; European Centre for Medium Range Forecasts (ECMWF), UK Meteorological Office (UKMO), International Research Institute (IRI), and the regional IGAD Climate Prediction and Applications Centre (ICPAC). This consensus forecast is produced as part of the GHACOF process, and is based on discussions by many interested parties. Consensus on the long-term prospects of each rainfall season is established through regional climate outlook fora. The fora attracts climate experts from global and regional climate prediction centers. The seasonal climate forecasts are based on empirical diagnostic analyses with Global Sea Surface Temperature (SST) anomaly patterns, the sate of El-nino Southerly Oscillation (ENSO), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), Indian Ocean Dipole (IOD) and upper level stratospheric winds such as the Madden J ulian Oscillation (MJ O), being the main predictors. The forecasts are issued in terciles i.e. below normal, normal and above normal with the probability of rainfall being in each of three categories as the forecast. These forecasts are are normally issued for relatively large homogeneous rainfall regions (over 9000km 2 ) extending over three month periods. The probabilities indicated are weights of expected climate categories of above normal, normal and below normal.
The definition of the boundaries between the forecast regions is a process of this discussion. The forecast is composed of categorical information of rainfall performance during the season for large regions (the least is over 9000km 2 ). This is indicated in terms of above- normal, normal and below -normal categories. The categories are further described by weights indicating the probability of occurrence of each category of forecast. This probabilistic categorization is what users find difficult to interpret and understand. Down- scaling the seasonal forecast is the process of interpreting the indicated probabilities into categories of rainfall amount which users could find easier to comprehend or understand.
Current seasonal climate forecasts do not provide adequate information required for farm level decision making. For example theres no information about the intra-seasonal character of the rainfall season i.e. the extent of wet/dry periods within the season. The demarcation of areas is often difficult for users located on the border line of the forecast spatial coverage since the forecast changes drastically each time. Besides, There is limited understanding of climate forecasting science among agricultural practitioners and extension agents and this makes it difficult for smallholder farmers to interpret and use forecasts on their own. A typical example of a seasonal forecast is shown in the figure 1. This covers the period between October and December 2009. The national weather forecasts in Kenya are disseminated through radio/TV, printed press, and the internet. Experience has shown that radio broadcasts are the most efficient means of communicating climate forecasts to rural communities in the country, while the Internet is least efficient method of climate forecast dissemination.
4 MATERIALS AND METHODS 4.1 Farmers Climate Information Requirements Assessments based on surveys and focus group discussions on stakeholder climate information needs was carried out in the Kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo districts of semi arid Eastern Kenya to investigate the utilization of climate information in agricultural management. The assessments were done to determine the way the terminology used in information dissemination and precision of the information influence decision-making. The following were identified as information requirements for decision making in on-farm agricultural management: Onset date for the main rains, quality of the rainy season or total amount of rainfall, cessation date for the main rains, temporal and spatial distribution for the main rains, timing and frequency of rainy and dry periods or wet and dry spells and agronomic recommendations in terms of which crop varieties to grow. 4.2 Downscaling: Quantifying Probabilistic Seasonal Forecasts of Estimated Rainfall Amounts to Local Scales Statistical downscaling involves the application of relationships identified in the observed climate, between the large and smaller-scale, to climate model output. It assumes that the relationships between predictors (large-scale variables) and predictands (small-scale surface variables) do not vary under climate change conditions. The process required to adapt model outputs to end-user demands is complex. The FACT-FIT agro-climatological toolkit was used for down-scaling the seasonal forecast issued by the Kenya Meteorological Department. The FACT-FIT agro-climatological toolkit utilizes a technique based on Monte Carlo simulation for adjusting existing mean climatologic statistical parameters of rainfall to match forecast information. The resultant new parameters define the probability of events for the forecast interval and are used to quantitatively perform adjustments to describe climatologically derived probability distribution of rainfall in proportion to the forecast probabilities Barnston et al., (2000). This technique, termed the Forecast Interpretation Tool (FIT), estimates new distribution parameters defining the probability distribution for the forecast interval. This distribution can be used to predict the likelihood of specific events during the forecast interval at specific stations or for rainfall fields so long as there is a reasonable climatological distribution. Details of the methodology and approach for seasonal estimation of rainfall are document by Husak et al (2010). The toolkit allows the users to generate probability maps, indicating locations that are likely or unlikely to attain critical rainfall amounts (thresholds). Fig 2 shows downscaled rainfall amounts for Kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo districts in Eastern Kenya for the March to May season in the year 2009. The threshold is set based on long term climate averages of the relevant location or specific crop water requirements. The maps generated are used to determine geographical areas that are at risk of experiencing significant rainfall amount deficit or surplus or increased likelihood of drought or flood occurrence depending on the areas specific climatic vulnerability. Farmers are more comfortable interpreting indicative rainfall amounts rather than probabilistic categories of forecast. Applying this process to the seasonal forecasts for two seasons each year in March April May (MAM) and October November December (OND) seasons for the years 2008 and 2009, helped to develop downscaled climate information for Kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo districts.Tables 1 and 2 show the respective seasonal forecast and corresponding rainfall amounts in the three districts. The downscaled seasonal forecast and identified suitable localized agriculture practices for the season are compiled into an agro-advisory bulletin for each location. 4.3 Integrating Seasonal Forecasting In On Farm Decision Making The project prepared the participation of farmers in two phases: The first socialisation phase began in late 2007 and focused on increasing farmer knowledge on climate and the use of seasonal forecast information to develop a cropping strategy. Farmer group leaders were trained on interpretation of probabilistic seasonal forecasts with a special ttention being given to leaders of farmer groups who would be expected to train other farmers, especially in geographic locations with low literacy levels. The second phase covered the year 2008 and 2009 and it mainly focused on operation and capacity-building for farmer groups to integrate climate and forecast information into their farming activities. In order to prepare for the implementation of the two phases, agricultural extension agents were trained by staff from Department of Meteorology to act as intermediaries/trainers. Topics covered in the training for the extension staff included:
1) Elements of weather and climate including the difference between weather and climate 2) Rain formation processes 3) Understanding terminologies used in seasonal forecasting 4) Understanding probability concepts 5) Use of climate forecast information in planting strategies 6) Quantifying the economic benefits of using climate forecast information
Farmers in the project research area grow a mixture of fast maturing maize, pigeon pea, green grams, sorghum and millet as their staple crops. The community members already have access to the seasonal rainfall forecasts developed at the bi-annual Greater Horn of Africa Climate Outlook Forum (GHACOF). The GHACOF forecasts are downscaled to national level and disseminated, by the Kenya Meteorological Department through radio and print media, with the former being the preferred mode of dissemination. The forecasts contain categorical probabilities of rainfall estimates for the two crop growing seasons in the study area: long rains season (MarchMay- MAM) and short rains season (OctoberDecember- OND). These categorical estimates are in the form of probabilities for rainfall totals falling in the ranges of below normal (a range defined by the 10 driest of the past 30 seasons), normal, or above normal (a range defined by the 10 wettest of the past 30 seasons). Beginning in February 2008, a series of seasonal participatory climate forecast workshops in each project site were held, designed to assist the group of farmers in each study site to better understand the forecast and to be able to apply it to their farm management decisions. The workshops took place in a location chosen by the farmers but always were held in the homes each of the farmers on rotation basis. Often the meeting lasted 2 -3 hours, and was conducted in English and Kiswahili and interpreted into the local language. The workshops followed a common format, designed to assist farmers in applying the forecast information:
They were were asked to comment on the previous seasons rainfall data, and whether it was in tandem with their recollection of the forecast. The forecast performance was measured against rain-gauge records on farmers fields and compared with farmers own historical knowledge of local rainfall quantities and estimates of actual ranges of rainfall. Farmers were then asked to comment on the success of their management practices in the past year, given the rainfall received. Farmers were asked to offer their insights into the coming years rainfall, based on their interpretation of local traditional rainfall indicators. The forecast for the coming season was explained to farmers, in terms of the probabilities for below-, about-, and above-normal rainfall levels. The forecast was downscaled, using the FACT-FIT agro-climatological toolkit. The information used to generate the forecast was explained in simple terms and questions were encouraged, including a discussion on El Nino phenomenon. And finally, a discussion was facilitated between farmers and the local agricultural extension service officers on the appropriate farm management practices for the coming year, taking into account the forecast, the local indicators and available planting seed. 4.4 Traditional practice and Prudent Preparation and Decisions of a Growing Season in Kitui, Mwingi and Mutomo Districts Farmers decisions for various farm operations in the three study districts is so much influenced by the conventional local practices in the region for each of the two seasons - long rains season or the short rains season. There exists knowledge on potential actions/responses and approaches for each of the two seasons among the locals in the study area 4.4.1 Traditional Allocation of Resources in Different Seasons Farming Practices
During the March, April May (MAM) season, farmers concentrate on drought resistant and fast-maturing crops such as green grams, maize and also tend to increase the herd size livestock. The acreage under crop is low compared to the short rains season. Onsets of the rains determine the crop species and variety to be sowed, while planting depths are also determined by the amount of rainfall received before planting.
During the October December season (OND), the most reliable rain season, there is increase in acreage and planting of late maturing crops and agro-forestry species. The converse is true. Should the farmers anticipate bad season, based on traditional indicators, they plant less acreage and resort to fast-maturing crops like in MAM season. Crops for this season include maize, pigeon peas, beans, dollicos, cotton, pumpkins, and establishment of pastures restocking of livestock and spraying against ticks. Soil/water conservation During OND season the main soil and water conservation activity is rehabilitation of water harvesting facilities, while during MAM season farmers in Kitui and Mutomo districts concentrate in establishment and construction of water harvesting structures. In Mwingi district, soil/water conservation establishment is done in J une-early October. In some areas, soil/water conservation works is done in J an-Feb Nutrient management During J une J uly August September (J J AS) season application of manure in preparation for OND season is the main nutrient management activity. Use of inorganic fertilizers is practiced during actual planting in OND season.
In general, the traditional practices used as the baseline measurement for prudent decisions by farmers and which were considered to be highly influenced by climate information as analyzed in this paper include: (i) Choice of crop and variety, where farmers would be expected to invest in crops which optimize output in good seasons or minimize risk in low rainfall seasons (ii) Level of investment in land, where farmers are expected to increase/decrease land under crop during wet/dry forecast (iii) Investment in farm input, where farmers make choice concerning farm iputs that are sensitive to climate information such as seed species and variety and soil and water management practices. The observed trend is increase in use of chemical fertilizer during wet season and decrease of the same during anticipated dry season and increase in use of manure during anticipated dry season and decrease in use of the same during anticipated wet season, and (iv) Acqusition of Credit, where farmers would be expected to go for financing of farm inputs during good seasons. Only one group (Kaveta FFS) had an internal credit facility mechanism which according to group by-laws was only accessed for farm related activities, and the same was monitored. 5 RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS
The use of forecasts was associated with varied decisions made by individual farmers results of which have been analyzed below for each season. 5.1 March-April-May season 2008
This was the first season of the project to tests farmers capability and acceptance of use of season forecast information in on-farm decision making. Indications show that only 12% of the farmers in Kitui and 8% in Mutomo used the decisions suggested in the agro- meteorological bulletin developed by the research team. The season forecast indicated normal to below-normal rainfall, yet several farmers, did not show signs of utilizing drought resilient crops or varieties. Fig 3 shows the land utilization for the various seasons, low land utilization was recorded during the March May 2008. 5.2 October-November-December season (OND) 2008
This was the second season of trials of the integration of seasonal forecasts in on-farm decision making. Forecast indication showed normal to above normal rainfall. Farmers were enthusiastic and went out and increased land under crop and invested in seeds and fertilizer Fig 4 shows the mount of fertilizer used by farmers in Kitui district, while Fig 5 shows the amount of fertilizer used by farmers in Mutomo. The season was however disappointing as it turned out that the actual temporal distribution of rain was bad and the season was characterized by long dry spells which caused water stress on the crops resulting in crop failure. 5.3 March-April-May season (MAM) 2009
The MAM 2009 season was the third season of the project in the field. The meteorologist had a hard time explaining the outcome of the previous season, and also gaining confidence of farmers given the failed forecast of OND 2008. However this was one of the seasons which had greater success in risk management actions among farmers. Forecast indications of below-normal rainfall were well interpreted in the downscaled rainfall amounts via the FACT-FIT toolkit. It was clear among the participating farmers that the season was going to be dry and probably a severe drought. Farmers responded positively to the forecast information by restraining investments, and went for low risk investments such as less land on crop, use of farm yard manure in place of chemical fertilizer. Farmers in Mutomo increased the amount of land on millet and sorghum which are more drought tolerant crops. 5.4 October-November-December season 2009 The OND 2009 season was greatly pronounced over the media as an El Nino year. Farmers eagerly awaited the seasonal forecast information from the meteorological department to enable them confirm their expectations. The forecast indication of near-normal to above- normal rainfall for all the locations of the study sites was well received by the farmers. Farmers reacted positively to forecast and invested greatly in land, labour and farm inputs. Conspicuous during this season was the heavy investments in chemical fertilizer, unlike in all the previous seasons.
Farmers expected huge gains from their farm activities. Most farmers went for greater investments in form of high yielding crop varieties and hybrid seeds. There was a problem however in the distribution of rain in Mwingi and Mutomo districts, with long dry spells in between rainfall episodes causing water stress on crops.
Credit is one aspect of agriculture which opens up financial risk. Fig 6 shows the credit acquisition of farmers in Kitui. Many authors have regarded farmers as risk averse. Credit is the most liquid investment a farmer may make, however despite the perceived risk, credit acquisition among the farmers in Kitui have also been observed to follow a similar trend as responce to climate information. Approximately 87% of the farmers in Kitui, acquired credit during the OND 2009 season when the forecast indicated above normal rainfall influenced by El Nino phenomena. It is a big deviation when compared to the previous seasons when only 24% acquired credit in OND 2008 when there was an indication of above-normal rainfall. The fact that the above-normal forecast was associated with El Nino may have motivated farmers to react positively. 6. CONCLUSIONS Seasonal forecasts benefit farmers most when they give them the opportunity to take advantage of good weather conditions. Downscaled seasonal forecasts can make the difference between optimizing on climate opportunities and risk management in arid and semi arid areas. Final evaluation of farmers confirmed long held opinion that integrating the effectiveness of climate and forecast information into their cropping strategies had not been effectively achieved. The key challenges identified were translating climate information into user-friendly language for farmers and integrating this into effective adaptation to climate change and variability. Utilization of land during the four seasons of the project had some distinct impressions of forecast guided decision making. Forecast information had greater influence on decisions of amount of land put on various crop types and seed varieties. Seasonal forecasts benefit farmers most when it provides opportunity to take advantage of climate conditions. Onset of rain and expected rainfall amounts is most important information for arid and semi arid lands. Downscaling climate information may be expensive, but it provides an informative approach for seasonal forecasts and farm-level decision making. Capacity building among farmers and extension agents on interpretation and use of seasonal forecast is necessary in order to reap the benefits of seasonal forecasts.
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The project Managing risk, reducing vulnerability and enhancing agricultural productivity under a changing climate is supported by the Climate Change Adaptation in Africa (CCAA) program, a joint initiative of Canadas International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the United Kingdoms Department for International Development (DFID). The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of DFID or IDRC.
8 REFERENCES Agrawala S, Broad K and Guston D H (2001) Integrating climate forecasts and societal decision making: challenges to an emergent boundary organization Science, Technology and Human Values 26 45477 Barnston A, He Y, Unger D. 2000. A forecast product that maximizes utility for state-of-the- art seasonal climate prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 81(6): 12711279.
Broad K, Agrawala S. The Ethiopia food crisis: uses and limits of climate forecasts. Science. 2000;289:16931694.
Goddard L, Barnston A, Mason S. 2003. Evaluation of the IRIs net assessment seasonal climate forecasts: 1997-2001. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 84(12): 17611781. Gregory J . Husak,a J oel Michaelsen, Phaedon Kyriakidis, J ames P. Verdin, Chris Funk, and Gideon Galu (2010) the forecast interpretation tool a monte carlo technique for blending climatic distributions with probabilistic forecasts, International J ournal of Climatology Hammer, G.L., Hansen, J .W., Phillips, J .G., Mjelde, J .W., Hill, H.S.J ., Love, H.A., & Potgieter, A.B. (2001). Advances in application of climate prediction in agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 70, 515553. Hammer G L (2000) A general systems approach to applying seasonal climate forecasts in Hammer G, Nicholls N and Mitchell C eds Applications of seasonal climate forecasting in agricultural and natural ecosystems the Australian experience Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 5165 J ames W. Hansen. Realizing the potential benefits of climate prediction to agriculture: issues, approaches, challenges. Agricultural Systems 74 (2002) 309330 Meinke, H., Baethgen, W.E., Carberry, P.S., Donatelli, M., Hammer, G.L., Selvaraju, R. and Stckle, C.O., 2001. Increasing profits and reducing risks in crop production using participatory systems simulation approaches. Ag Systems, 70: 493-513. Meinke, H. and Stone, R.C., 2004. Seasonal and inter-annual climate forecasting: the new tool for increasing preparedness to climate variability and change in agricultural planning and operations. Climatic Change, in press. Nyakwada W- Ocholla A B C, Mango C, Onyango M, . Musembi D.K, Nyakwada C (2003), The traditional rainfall indicators used to monitor and predict rainfall in Kenya, Drought Monitoring Centre, Nairobi, DMCN Report OBrien K, Sygna L, Nss L O, Kingamkono R and Hochobeb B (2000) Is information enough? User responses to seasonal climate forecasts in Southern Africa CICERO report no. 200003 Palmer T N and Anderson D (1994) The prospects for seasonal forecasting a review paper Quarterly J ournal of the Meteorological Society 120 75593 Patt A, Gwata C. Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Global Environ. Change. 2002;12:185195. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00013-4 Phillips, J .G., 1998: Comparing Optimal Use of ENSO Forecast Information in two socioeconomic contexts. Invited Talk at the American Association of Geographers Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, March 1998. Phillips, J .G. et al, 2001: Current and Potential Use of Climate Forecasts for Resource-poor Farmers in Zimbabwe. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, USA. Impact of El Nino and Climate Variability on Agriculture. ASA Special Publication no. 63 Roncoli, C, C J ost, P Kirshen, M Sanon, KT Ingram, M Woodin, L Some, F Ouattara, BJ Sanfo, C Sia, P Yaka and G Hoogenboom (2009). From accessing to assessing forecasts: an end-to-end study of participatory climate forecast dissemination in Burkina Faso (West Africa). Climatic Change 92:433-460. Unganai, L.S., (2000): Application of long range rainfall forecasts in agricultural management: a review of Africas experiences. Proceedings of the International Forum on Climate Prediction, Agriculture and Development, International Research Institute for Climate Prediction Wilks DS. 2000. On interpretation of probabilistic climate forecasts. J ournal of Climate 13(11): 19651971.
Ziervogel, G (2004). Targeting seasonal climate forecasts for integration into household level decisions; the case of smallholder farmers in Lesotho. The Geographical J ournal, Vol. 170, No 1, pp 6-21 18 ibid
Table 1 Categorical Forecast and Corresponding Downscaled rainfall amounts for Kitui
SEASON Forecast category Category of Estimated rainfall Amounts for the Season Probability of Occurrence of indicated amounts Actual Rainfall amounts received for the Season (as monitored by farmers) MAM 2008 normal to below normal 240 -280mm 70% 80% 340.3 OND 2008 Near normal to above normal 280 -300mm
40% - 50% 227 MAM 2009 Below normal 150 240mm
60% - 70% 203.6 OND 2009 Near normal to above normal
260 -300 20% - 40% 596
Table 2: Categorical Forecast and corresponding downscaled rainfall Amounts for Mutomo
SEASON Forecast category Category of Estimated rainfall Amounts for the Season (downscaled by FACT-FIT) Probability of Occurrence of indicated amounts Actual Rainfall amounts received for the Season (as monitored by farmers) MAM 2008 normal to below normal 100 -200mm 10% -30% 140.3 OND 2008 Near normal to above normal 260 -280mm 40% - 60% 341.4 MAM 2009 Below normal 200 -260mm 20% - 40%
70.7 OND 2009 Near normal to above normal 240 -280mm 50% -60% 291.6
Figure 1 GHA Seasonal Climate Forecast MAM 2009
Figure 2 Downscaled seasonal forecast Kitui District MAM 2009
Figure 3 Land Under Crop in Mutomo
Figure 4 Amount of Fertilizer used by Farmers in Kitui
Figure 5 Amount of Fertilizer used by Farmers in Mutomo
Figure 6 Proportion of Farmers Seeking Local Credit in Kitui