Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
= 2.93
S = 1.29
Z
cal
= (
)/ (/n) = 1.87
At 5% level of significance, follows Z distribution Z
0.05
=1.645
Since Z
cal >
Z
tab
, the null hypothesis is
rejected or not accepted. So at 5% level of significance, it can be
said that Mobile phone helps us with improving relationship.
Fig-1: Respondents view towards improving relationships.
From this study it is revealed that 32% respondents are unimportant ,23% respondents are
somewhat important ,17% respondents are important ,15% respondents are very important,
another 13% respondents are extremely important on Relative advantage of cell phone positively
somewhat
important
16.12%
important
29.03%
very important
22.58%
Extremely
important
12.90%
Unimportant
19.35%
H1
14
influences the customer. So, most of the respondents identified that mobile phone adoption
intensity is positively associated with improving relationship.
02. Ho: Mobile phone adoption is associated with enhancing communication.
HA: Mobile phone adoption is not associated with enhancing communication.
I want to test the null hypothesis
H
O:
= 2.5
H
A:
2.5
n = 31
Since the sample size n > 30 so, I may use Z - test.
Here
= 3.48
S = 1.34
Z
cal
= (
)/ (/n) = 4.08
At 5% level of significance, follows Z distribution Z
0.05
=1.645
Since Z
cal >
Z
tab
, the null hypothesis is
rejected or not accepted. So at 5% level of significance, it can be
said that Mobile phone adoption is associated with enhancing communication.
Fig-2: Respondents view towards enhancing communication.
unimportant
9%
somewhat
important
15%
important
18%
very important
27%
extremely
important
31%
H2
15
From this study it is revealed that 17% respondents think unimportant, 25% respondents are
somewhat important, 20% respondents are very important, 14% respondents are extremely
important. So, most of the respondents identified that mobile phone adoption intensity is
positively associated with enhancing communication.
03. H0: Mobile phone help us to strong our social ties.
HA: Mobile phone does not help us to strong our social ties.
I want to test the null hypothesis
H
O:
= 2.5
H
A:
2.5
n = 31
Since the sample size n >30 so, I may use Z - test.
Here
= 3.12
S = 1.43
Z
cal
= (
)/ (/n) = 1.72
At 5% level of significance, follows Z distribution Z
0.05
=1.645
Since Z
cal >
Z
tab
, the null hypothesis is
rejected or not accepted. So at 5% level of significance, it can be
said that Mobile phone help us to strong our social ties.
Stomewhat
important
22
important
18%
very important
24%
extremely
important
21%
unimportant
15%
H3
16
Fig-3: Respondents view towards social tie.
From this study it is revealed that 21% respondents are unimportant ,15% respondents are
somewhat important ,24% respondents are neither important nor unimportant ,18% respondents
are very important, another 22% respondents are extremely important. So, most of the
respondents are neither important nor unimportant that mobile phone adoption intensity is
positively associated with improving social ties.
04. Ho: Mobile phone sometime enhances crime.
HA: Mobile phone does not enhance crime.
I want to test the null hypothesis
H
O:
= 2.5
H
A:
2.5
n = 31
Since the sample size n >30 so, I may use Z - test.
Here
= 2.93
S = 1.43
Z
cal
= (
)/ (/n) = 1.72
At 5% level of significance, follows Z distribution Z
0.05
=1.645
Since Z
cal >
Z
tab
, the null hypothesis is
rejected or not accepted. So at 5% level of significance, it can be
said that Mobile phone sometime enhances crime.
17
Fig-4: Respondents view towards enhancing crime.
From this study it is revealed that 34% respondents are unimportant, 25% respondents are
somewhat important, 20% respondents are important, 12% respondents are very important,
another 9% respondents are extremely important. So, most of the respondents identified that
mobile phone adoption intensity is negatively associated with enhancing crime.
05. Ho: Mobile phone adoption is associated with health related problems.
HA: Mobile phone adoption is not associated with health related problems.
I want to test the null hypothesis
H
O:
= 2.5
H
A:
2.5
n = 31
Since the sample size n >30 so, I may use Z - test.
Here
= 3.25
S = 1.45
Z
cal
= (
)/ (/n) = 2.88
At 5% level of significance, follows Z distribution Z
0.05
=1.645
somewhat
important
9%
important
12%
very important
20%
extremely
important
34%
unimportant
25%
H4
18
Since Z
cal >
Z
tab
, the null hypothesis is
rejected or not accepted. So at 5% level of significance, it can be
said that Mobile phone adoption is associated with health related problems.
Fig-5: Respondents view towards health related problem.
From this study it is revealed that 23% respondents are unimportant ,32% respondents are
strongly unimportant ,15% respondents are neither unimportant nor unimportant ,17%
respondents are unimportant, another 13% respondents are strongly unimportant. So, most of the
respondents identified that mobile phone adoption intensity is associated with health related
problem.
Somewhat
important
13%
important
17%
very important
15%
extremely
important
23%
unimportant
32%
H5
19
Ending part
Conclusion
Mobile phones have an effect on the way that individuals function in society, and while there has
not been a lot of research on the effects of mobile phone use, it has both positive and negative
consequences. Mobile phones in their small time in existence have changed the way in which
individuals are interacting with each other. Mobile phones have provided avenues for individuals
to stay connected on a new level that does not depend on space or time, but is readily accessible
at anytime, anywhere. Mobile phone has allowed social networks and relationships to be
strengthened as well as new relationships formed and have also allowed individuals all over the
world that, without the mobile phone would never have access to all of the networks, access
information that they do through the mobile phone.
Even within such an ostensibly regular people of mobile phone users Kumasi Polytechnic
community use of mobile phones and their attitudes toward their mobile phone usage and in
terms of the levels of integrating mobile phones into their lives.
20
Furthermore, majority of the respondents of IUBAT campus believe that mobile phones have
positive impact on society and have contributed to easy and quick access and transfer of
information, enhancing communication and improving relationships as well as societal ties. On
the other hand about 60% of respondents also have the perception that mobile phones have
negative influence on society and this includes enhancing crime, diversion of attention and health
related problems. While it has provided a new avenue to social networking and interactions, the
change in the space and time concept has also had a negative effect as well.
In addition, many of us have likely experienced a situation where we have been in the presence
of a mobile phone user who is engaging in some form of rude behavior that lacks respect for the
individuals around them. Mobile phones have changed the way that individuals socially interact
and individuals are communicating more through text messages and mobile phones than face-to-
face, changing our social environment. Individuals have become enveloped in their mobile
phones and less aware of their social surroundings, missing out on possible new social
interactions. Mobile phones have become part of their lives and they actively use the phones to
keep in touch with people and manage their time efficiently. Though this study is limited in
sampling and cannot be generalized to any larger population, it is interesting to discover that
such distinct attitudinal differences exist among the mobile phone users. Mobile communication
technologies are advancing rapidly. For example, mobile phones with Internet access and
multimedia capabilities are becoming common in all parts of the world. With advances in
technology come changes in users attitudes toward those technologies. These generate new
social and cultural phenomena. These social and cultural phenomena may change the way
technology evolves as well as our behavior and the society at large.
Recommendation
Children should not use cell phones that are under age. If user of cell phone is below 18
or he/she is not mature enough to handle a cell phone should be use by those to whome
its necessary. Who have important purpose of using it.
Should raise awareness among the students. Teacher and media can do the part here.
21
SIM registration should be mandatory, so that no one will dare to do crime through cell
phone.
Web page OR fan page can be developed to aware them socially.
Cell Phone Company can provide basic information about using cell phone and how it is
harmful to us.
Cell phone is easy way to communicate with people but communication purpose should
be meaningful.
Too much talk over the cell phone can be harmful for health. It sometimes causes
headache. It could also create some other physical problem. So, too much conversation
over cell phone should be avoid
Cell phone also create problem like boys irritate girls over cell phone which is a social
problem. Also cell phone has been use by terrorist group in their activities. This is threat
for our society. So, cell phone use should be sharply observed by authority.
Reference
Adriana Bianchi and Dr. James G. Phillips 2007). Positive contribution of mobile phones
tosociety. Mobile government consortium international
Alexia C (2009). Cellular phones influence(s) and impact(s) on social interactions and
interpersonal relationships.
Choi S (2006). A double-edged Mobile Phone and Smart Mob. [On line]
http://next.joins.com/article/? NID=365 Computers in Human Behaviors. 1182-1187.
Fortunati L (2002). "The Mobile Phone: Towards New Categories and Social Relations."
Information, Communication & Society 5(4):513.
Koo and Parks (2010)"Mobile Media and Communication: Some Important Questions."
22
(Saylor 2012)The Role of the Telephone in Economic Development.Telecommunications
Policy,4(4):278-286
Wahiduddin Mahmud, Academic Publishers, 1992.
Appendix part
23
Questionnaire
Dear Sir /Madam
We are the students of BBA Program in College of Business Administration of International
University of Business Agriculture and Technology (IUBAT). As part of completion our
Business Research course we are conducting a survey on social changes because of cell phone.
We would like to have your valuable opinion on it. The information will be used for study
purpose only. All responses will be of course, treated anonymously and confidentially.
Respondents Profile:
Gender of the Respondent Male Female
Age (In years) 15-30 30-40 above 40
Education Under Graduate Graduate Others (Please specify) .
Profession Student Teacher
1. Do you know about the disadvantages of cell phone?
Yes No (Tick please)
[If No, please brief the reason below and stop interviewing]
...
...............
2. Do you believe that cell phone can hamper in the education related issue?
Yes No
[If No, please brief the reason below and stop interviewing]
...
...............
3. Cell phone cans create negative impact on health.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
4. Cell phones provoke crime activities.
24
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
5. Cell phones improve the relationship.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
6. Cell phones make the social ties stronger.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
7. Cell phones enhance the communication with others.
Strongly Disagree Disagree Agree Strongly Agree
8. What type of changes cell phone brings in the society?
a.
b.
c.
d.