Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
<,
"
1000
c
500
h: t .a mm
h = 1 2mm
250 200 '50 100 50
Radius Imrn]
Concrete slabs
Stressnbbons
Boltedplates
Art iculated
bearing
W Elast ic modulus of t he section (= 2' l/h)
R Radiusof t he saddle
As shown in the equation above, the bend-
ing st ress is indirectly proportional to the saddle
radiusand directly proportional to the ribbon
depth. In order to reduce the bending stress, the
saddle radius should be as great aspossible wi th
t he thinnest possible ribbon depth. The required
saddle radiuscan be determined for a material
wi th a yield strength of f
yd,
depending on the sag,
ribbon dept h and width, loading and span as
follows:
The saddle length must be chosen so that
the band never reachesthe edge of the saddle
under variable loading to avoid folding. There-
quired lengt h for a saddle above an intermediate
pier isgiven asfollows:
L=2 it Ra/360
where
a =adeadload+ 2lw. =arctan (4f/ I) + 2t:.a
2t:. a = The changein angle of the ribbon at the
saddle due to live loading and erecti on tolerances.
Stress nbbon
Theadvantageof high-st rength materialsis
evident in the equation above. Not only can bands
of high-strength materialswithstand higher
stresses, theyare also thinner. Thisleadsto a
reduction of bending stresses and saddle size.
The image below left showsthe required saddle
size with respect to type of band and magnitude
of t he bending st ress.
Lateral bracing
All stress ribbonsare suscept ible to dynamic
excitat ion due to their light weight. The ribbons
t hemselves exhibit very low material damping
characteristics, which can result in t he structure
oscillat ing wi dely. Thebridge's dynamic behaviour
can be improved by creating a prestressed con-
crete ribbon t hat isrigid in bending, or by adding
massto the st ructure. For thisreason, heavy
concrete slabs are usedfor t he bridge deck in the
Saddle size
86 Taking Lightness to the Limit Anchoring of the ribbons
Cable Stiffening
==-
Reductionof sag
Additionalmass
Bendingstiffness
Additional cables
Stiffeninggirder
Pforzheimand Rostock bridgesto add massand
decreasethe deflections of thest ructure under
variable loading. Fort unately, t he natural damping
characteristicsof non-structural membersmay be
exploited to add damping. Chain link guardrails
have been proveneffectiveby dissi pating the
dynamic energy of the structure into heat energy
through friction in the guardrail filling. TheGlacis
Bridge hasshown that a chain link guardrail can
doublethe damping of the structure [fib guidelines
2005] The imagesto the left show the fivemost
important methodsfor reducing t he deflectionsof
suspended ribbons. By adding additional structural
elements that arenot part of the suspended
ribbon, bridgeswith cable girdersand stiff ening
t russescan be considered separate st ruct ural typo-
logies.
Carbon f ibre ribbons
The advantagesof high-st rength materials
mentioned abovewould inclinea designer to
choosethe highest-strength material currently
available, carbonfibre. Carbon fibre iscurrently
used in the aviation indust ryand racing carsdueto
its high strength- 10t imeshigher than normal
st ructural steel - and its low weight - onefift h of
that for steel. In st ructural engineering, carbon
fibre hasst rangely enough found litt le application
or applicat ion asreinforcementof existing
reinforced concrete st ructures.
A test bridge project using carbon fibre
ribbonswasthereforecarried out at t heTechnical
University Berlin. Thestructurewasdesigned
accordingto the current codes and standards. The
struct uredemonstratesthat a ribbon t hicknessof
only 1 mmissuff icient to support a span of 15 m.
In order to reduce t he dynamic oscillations
of thisext remely lightweight bridge, additional
mass isadded to the bridge in theformof 10 cm
deepconcrete slabs. This isthe starti ng point for
further research at t heTUBerlin, on " intelligent"
damping systemsthat would allow very lightly
decked, and therefore lively struct ures, to be
efficiently "quieted" - wit hout the additional mass.
Carbon fibrematerialscouldthen be used optimally
in the st ruct ural design.
Test bridge at the Technical University Berlin
Eibl, Josef and Klemens Pel le, Zur Bcrcchnung von Spannba nd-
hruckcn . Hache I hinge-band er , Dusseldorf,
Ost er, Han s, Fu13gangerhrucketl von Jiir g Sc-hlaich lind Rud ol f BlT-
ger mann, Exhibiti on catalogue, 199 2
Schl aic-h, Jorgand Stephan Engt'!smann , St ress Ribbon Co nc-ret e
Bridgt. ' s, Str uct ura l Fnginecring lntcrna tion al, 4, Novem ber 1996
Schlaich, f\.\ ikc ct ai. , Gu ide line s for the (k sign of foot br idges, lib,
federat ion int crn ati on alc du bcton , bullet in p , l ausanne, Nove mber
200)
Stras kv, Jir i, Str ess r-ibbon and cable-supporte d pedes tr ian br idges,
TbornasI clford, London,
87
88 Taking Lightnessto the Limit
The footbridge connects two very different parksover a highway
Schiller Footbridge in Stuttgart, Germany, 1961
68.6m 24 m
Leo nhardt , Fritz and Wolfhart
Andr a, FuBgangersteg tiberdie
SchillerstraBe in Stuttgar t, in:
Bautechnik , 1962
Schlaich, Schuller, ' 999,
pp. 17)- 174
Aft er th e Second World War, Fritz Leonhardt's attempts to create
light and slender structures quickly set a high standard for structural
design . Th e rel evance of the ideals of lightness and slend erness to German
cult ure were explicitly laid out, but these ideals th e opposit e the Nati onal
Socialist monumental aestheti c. Steel , and later pre stressed concrete ,
enabled th e engineers to embody the lightweight ideal in structural
design. The Enz Footbridge is a wonder ful example ofthis (see P: 62) .
Th e engineers in the office of Leonhardt & Andra would not rest until
they had reduced th e depth of the deck slab from )2 to )0 em. The
structural syst em of th e cable-stayed bridge is well suited to this desire:
by decreasing th e distance between cable suppor ts, the deck can be made
more slender as the bending moments ar e redu ced . Fritz Leonhardt' s
greatest goal was to make the deck as slender as possible, although he
never explicitl y discu ssed the aesthetic rationale of th e ideal of slenderness
in design . The angular cont our s of the cable-st ayed structure did not,
however, guarantee respect for Leonhardt's second design maxim: elegance.
Ther e are two types of cable-stayed bridges. In the "har p" arrange-
ment, the stay cable s ar e parallel t o one another. Fritz Leonhardt built
th e first cable-stayed bridge with a harp arr angement in (9)2 in th e
Diisseldorf family of bridges . The architect Fri edrich Tamms insisted on
th is cable arrangement, which cont inues to shape the skyline of Diisseldorf,
in particular th e Ob erkasseler , th e Theodor-Heuss, and the Rheinknie
Bridges. Fritz Leonhardt referred to the fan arrangeme nt as the most
"nat ural and technically effect ive" cable arrangement , as can be seen in
th e footbridges in Stuttgart and Mannheim.
I S5m I
Typical 1970s blocks of flats required pedestrian accessto the city centre . The deck widens around the pylons. 89
o
56.5 rn
6.4 rn
Dornecker, Ar tur; Eberhard
vollc.cI and Wilhelm Zelln er, Die
Schriigkahclbriicke fUr FuOganger
iiber den Neckar in Mannheim, in:
Beton- und Stehlbau, 2 and 3. 1977.
pp. 29 -35 and
Keller, Giorgio, Ponte pedonalc
strallato suI Necker a Mannhcirn . in:
L'industria haliana del Cemento,
11,1982 , pp. 817-82S"
1390 m 56.5 rn
Neckar Footbridge at the Collini Centre in Mannheim, Germany, 1973
The structure consists of a nat deck girder suspended from two
stay cable planes to each edge. The stay cables (parallel wire strand) are
individually anchored at the top of the steel pylons. The longitudinal
distance of 9 to 10 m between stays, enables the deck girder con consist
of a trapezoidal section only 60 cm deep in reinforced concrete. The
stiffening girder is haunched in the longitudinal and transverse
directions. The girder has a depth of 1.2 m at the pylons. An expansion
joint is provided at the midspan, and the bearings at the base of the
pylons are fixed in translation by free to rotate. The joint in the midspan
allows the bridge deck to expand but nevertheless transfers shear forces
and torsional moments. The cross section of the st eel pylon is merely Ixl m
at the base. The depth of the pylon cross section increases in longitudinal
direction to 1.4 m at the head of the pylon to make room for the cable
anchorages. The wide Flood plane of the Neckar and main span of 139.6 m
may have contributed to Leonhardt's choice of a fan arrangement for the
stay cables, but the brittle, linear appearance of the bridge does not
bring elegance to mind. The Neckar footbridge does not have a modelled
appearance, despite the widening of the deck at the base of the pylon.
The visual impression remains linear, comparable to a line drawing.
90
27m
Taking Lightness to the Limit
51. 1 m
27.2 m
Footbridge in Rosenstein Park, Stuttgart, Germany, 1977
Jorg Schl aich worked as a you ng engineer in th e office of Leonhardt
and Andra, t he bi rthplace of lightweight const r uctio n. In t he early 1970 S,
th e offi ce was working on th e constructi on of a t ent roof for the Ol ympi c
spor ts halls in Munich. Jor g Schlaich - a partner in the office since 1970 -
devel oped int o a structural engi nee r with except ional curiosit y, fant asy
and disrespec t for th e conventi onal wi sdom. As part of a provincial garden
show, a redevelopment of a cit y zone , left barren by traffi c planning, was
ordered . Pedestrians we re to be able to cross over a multi-lane mot or way
and t ramline from a park to the popular spa. This led to the creat ion of
t he fir st contemporary self-anchored susp ension bridge. The deck gi rder,
a concre te slab, is fixed at one abut me nt but fre e in hori zontal transl at ion
at t he opposite abutment. A lifting of the deck is blocked at thi s abut me nt .
The main cabl es (fully locked coil st rand d = 75 mm) ar e anchored at each
ofthe deck 's corner points. A continuous saddle is provided at the head
of th e pylon without clamping. The anchorages of the cables ar e merged
into th e deck, making insp ection and maintenance diffi cult . The mast is a
simple square cross section of four welded plat es to avoid high costs. This
footbridge was built as a cable truss bridge, with th e surface slabs laid
di rectl y on the st r uct ural cables .
Schleich, Jiirg and H. Bcichc.
Ful1gangerhriicken tiber die
Bundesgartenschau 1977 in
Stuttgart, in: Beton - und Stahl-
bctonbau , ' , 1979 , pp. IH6
Two in one: cable trussandsuspension bridge 91
92 Taking Lightness to the Limit
Bridge at Max Eyth Lake near Stuttgart, Germany, 1989
3.1 m
114m
The const r uct ion of the cable suspension bridge marked t he parting
of Fritz Leonhardt and Jorg Schlaich, who founded an offi ce with Rudolf
Bergermann in 1980. The bridge crosses high above the Neckar and con-
nects a residential zone near the river with the Max Eyth Lake recr eational
area. At one bank, a narrow path conti nues up a st eep hillside vineyar d.
The wide floodplains of the Neckar extend to the other bank. Jorg Schlai ch
designed a suspension bridge with 20 to 25 m high mast s (round hollow
ste el , d= 7" mm, t = 40 -50 mm) th e deck passes in front of th e mast and
joins the vineyard path. To the other side, th e deck splits just before th e
mast . To th e left th e approach spirals down to a path parall el to t he river -
bank, to the right directly to th e lake. Leonhardt felt that th e mast should
stand to the side of the deck. The light cur vat ure of the bridge can easily
be viewed from atop the deck and engrains the visual appearance of the
structure. With a span of "4 m, th e deck is merely 30 em deep. The mast
to th e side of th e flood plain supports half of th e br idge as well as the
appr oach; to the Vineyard side , the mast onl y supports one half of the
bridge and it passes directly t o an abutment . The mast to th e vineyard side
is back-st ayed with two cables anchored to th e hill side. The hangers are
incl ined along the length of the deck, which helps to stiffen the deck
girder . The railing consists of a wire net simply clamped to cabl es run-
ning parallel to the edge of th e deck, one of whi ch serves as the handrail.
The main cabl es and backstays are full y locked coil strand (d = 106 mm)
and the hanger s ar e thin st ainless helical st rand
(d = 16 mm) . Prefabricated deck elements wer e susp end ed from the main
cables starting at the mid span during erect ion. These segments were in
th e form of aU. Aft er the rebar of the ind ividual segments was welded
tog ether, the remainder of th e deck was concrete d in situ to crea te a
continuous slab. This procedure mad e it possible to erec t the structure
without the use of formwork but required a very high level of geometric
and te chnical pr ecision.
Schlatch, Jorg and E. Schurr.
FuBgangcrbruckebei Stuttgart,
in: Beton- und Stahlbetonhau,
8, '990 , pp. 191-198
The first suspension bridgewith a curved deck-Ji qhtweiqht and logical lydesigned to the lastdetai l 93
94 Taking Lightness to the Limit
A main spanof 252 m- oneof the longest suspension footbridgesin Europe
The res ervoi r in Vranov, near the 1930 border between Austria and
t he Cze ch Repu bli c, is a popular vacat ion area in t he summer. Th e br idge
repl aces a ferry and supports wate r and gas lines bet ween the t own
centre with it s hot el s and rest aurants and the beach the ot her side of the
river. The deck is a slende r slab with a 2)2 m main span and two 30 m
approach spans .
]iri St rasky is an ext re mely exper ienced pedestri an bridge designer.
Hi s first st ress ribbons appe are d in the 1970S in the former Czec ho-
slovakia, made of pr efabri cat ed concre te segme nts and pr estressed
t end ons as th e ten sion eleme nt. Seven of these DS-L Bridges were built
between 197 9 and 19 85. His susp en sion bridge over the Vranov Reservoi r
in southern Mor avia is pot ent evide nce th at suspension bridges ar e
rel evant st r uct ures for spans less than 1000 m. With a main span of 2)2 m,
th is footbrid ge slende r footbridge is one of the longest in th e world. The
deck of th e st r uct ure is 3. 4 m wid e and only 40 cm deep. Th e technical
curiosity of thi s br idge: part of th e hor izont al component of the
suspension cable is anchored in the deck, thereby reducing t he costs of
Strasky , '00, the abut ment anchorage .
30m I 2S2 m
Suspension Bridge in Vranov, Czech Republic, 1993
30m
9.6 m
Solid anchorblocks 95
\ "
96 Taking Lightness to the limit Steel cables combined with a reinforced plasti c deck
Halgavor Bridge in Bodmin, Cornwall , UK, 2001
The Halgavor Bridge sout h of Bodmin in Cornwall is one of the fir st
bridges made from fibr e-reinforced plastic s in the UK. The bridge was
required to cross a heavily used highway and was to cause minimal
di sruption t o the traffic below and need minimal maintenance. In addition,
the bridge would be used as a bridlewa y, the wast e from whi ch cre ates a
highl y cor ros ive environment. These requirements led the engineers of
Flint & Neill from London, known for their exper ime nt at ion, to suggest
a carbon fibr e-r einforced plasti c as the mat eri al for the superstructure
due to its lightweight , cor rosion resistance and durability.
Th e suspension cabl es and mast of the st r uct ure with its 47 m span
ar e in st eel. The hanger cables have a radial arrangement . They and the
1.8 m high wire net railings are in stainless steel. The railings are so high
due to th e bridleway. At the bottom of th e railing, wood en blinders ar e
provided. Th e 3.) m wide fibr e-reinforced deck consist s of two channel-
shaped, )0 cm deep edge beams and a 37 mm deep composite sandwich
plat e. The plat e is suppor te d by secondary transver se and longitudinal
girders . The st iffness of the deck is det ermined by the lower Young's
modulus of the handmade edge beams (E =12 , 8 0 0 Nzrnrn") . The machine
produced sandwich pan els have higher st iffness (E = 22 , 0 0 0 Nzrnm") . Th e
deck is flexible enough to be monolithically connecte d t o the side
abut me nts without cre at ing high st ress fro m const raining forces und er
t emper ature loading.
Th er e ar e no codes and ver y few guidelines for the design of fibr e-
rein for ced plasti cs, so t esting was required t o ver ify th e st r uct ural
integ r ity. The bearing st re ngt h of th e bolt ed anchor age of the hanger int o
the deck was confir med by testing. The dynamic respon se of the st r uct ure
was closely monitored befor e its inauguration. Th e damping effects of the
wooden blinder s, the flexible sur facing of recycled tyres, and the chain
link railin g wer e suffici ent to hamper dynami c oscill at ions.
The erec t ion of the deck was car r ied out in one night with th e 31m
long mids ection of the bridge was hung fr om the susp ension cables . The
bridge was opened to the public in July 2001. Shou ld t hese plastic bridges
truly have lower maintenance cost s and erec t ion time, we will surely see
mor e of them in the future.
Fir th I. . Cooper D. ,
Material s for New hrid ges
- li alga\'Or Bride UK, in:
Str uctura l Engineerin g
Intern at ional , May 20 0 2, SEl12:2
579 m
47 m
3.7 m
Pedestrian, cyclist, horsesand their riders
97
98 Taking Lightness to the Limit
68m
Bridge over the Rhone in Sierre, lies Fal con, Switzerland, 1998
In the Rhone valley, th e convers ion of the industrial society is just
as diffi cult as it is anywh er e el se, in spite of a more ver satile eco nomy.
Abandoned indu strial zones must be r ehab ilit at ed and conver te d to
counter act th eir det eri orat ion . In Sicrre, t he lies Falcon are just such an
indust r ial zone t hat is being revert ed piece by piece to a more natural
environme nt, wit h a hik ing trail that crosses t he Rhone and join s a st eep
hi llside. An asymmet r ically suspended, 3.6 m wide bridge ent ices hik er s
to cross. The incl ined , 26.36 m high pylons make a power ful architect ural
gest ure. Over th e next few years , th e hiking path will be completed up
the hill side - until t hen th e br idge seems unmot ivat ed and without a rol e.
It is st r iking t hat t he enginee rs of Daun er , Joli at & associes usc t he
nort hern abut me nt as cent ral design const ra int and int egrat e it into t he
hiking trail. The sole problem of th e anchorages' pot ent ially over power ing
visual impact is elega ntly solved . Well -conceived detai ls for t he railing
and t he change in dec k surfacing at t he br idgehead along wit h t he precise
exec ut ion produce a coherent st r uct ure with a span of 68 m and a t ota l
lengt h of 88. 45 m. The t ensioning of t he suspe nsion cable crea tes light
arching of t he deck. Du e to changes in temper ature, t he bri dge is st iffer
in wint er and more flexible in summer - but always sufficiently stable.
One unique feature is th e black beam that join s and st abi lizes the two
mast s. Hop efully the hiking t rail will soo n be complete d and the bridge
will soon car ry pedestrians afte r nin e years as a ghost bridge.
Fromanindustrial area to natural environment
The bridge currently ends in no man'sland, a hiking trail will beadded shortly
99
21 m
26.4m
100 Taking Lightness to the Limit Load test ing of the foot bridge in Sassnitz
Dynami cs, vibrations In the German language, the termfor struc-
t ural engineersisStatiker, and the structural analy-
sis and calculationsof a project are referredto as
the Statik. These expressions refer to the field of
static mechanics, the dominant field of mechanics
that structural engineershandle. In the analysisof
most st ruct ures, t he loading that actson the struc-
ture isconsideredto bestationary, which means
that the structure isconsidered to deform only
slight ly, and not to vibrate. Increasingly lightweight
and slender structuresare being built as high-
strength materialsbecome more readi ly available.
Thisoft en produces more aesthetic designswhile
conserving resources. Lightweight structures, how-
ever, arelivelystruct urest hat exhibit larger deflec-
t ionst han heavystruct ures, and are generally
susceptibleto dynamic excitation.
While staticsare largelysuff icient for analy-
sing a heavystone arch, t hedynamic behaviour of
a lightweight footbridge must beconsideredcare-
fully. Not all phenomena in t he dynamicsof st ruc-
turesare completely understood. Recently, several
landmark pedestrianbridgeshaveexhibited spirited
dynamic oscillations, resul ting in much press
coverageand the subsequentinstallation of
damping devices. It isno surprise that the dynamic
behaviour of pedestrian bridges hasbecome the
maintopic of many bridge conferences. A chapter
of t his book istherefore devotedto t he dynamics
of pedestrianbridges.
Generally speaking, it isthe loading of the
pedestrian themselves, and more rarely wind
loading, that excites bridgestructuresto large
oscillations, or sometimesto collapse. Two
spectacular bridge collapses in England (Broughton
Bridge near Manchester, 1831)andFrance (Angers,
1850) due to synchronized marching of soldiers
haveled to t he common practiceof soldiersto
break step while crossing a bridge. Thiscan be
seenon the notice on the Albert Bridgein London
("All troops must break step when marching over
t his bridge"), and in the current German road
t raff ic regulations.
Frequencies
Thedesignof the structuredependson the
resonance (fromthe Latin, resonare:to echo) of
the structure. A good example of thisisa swing.
Step frequencies of pedest rians Loading behaviour
FplG IkN]
Deckwit h inclined hangers 101
1.5
15 vs Is
[Hz] [rn/s] [m]
slow pace 1.7 1.0 0.60
normal pace 20 1.5 0.75 as
fast pace 2.3 2.3 1.00
normal running 2.5 3. 1 125
t [kNI
spnntmg > 3.2 5.5 1.75
02 0.4 0.6 08
4m I
75 m
Millennium Bridge, London, UK, 2001
168 The Call for Symbols
r-----------.,..",.-,'' O''-- -,.._- __
"Pedestrians only. No motorcycles, pedal cycles, scooters, roll er -
skates, roll erblades or skateboards" - so reads the sign at the ent rance to
th e Mill ennium Bridge in London. The list of those who may not use the
st r uct ure is long, which provokes th e question of why this may be. The
bridge was closed just a few hours after its spectacular opening in Jun e
2000 due to vibrations. However, th e structure was the product of adept
design: the change in the ent ire urban zone charact er ized by Herzog &
de Meuron' s conversion of the old power plant into th e Tate Mod ern is
further symbolized by a footbridge . The new millennium brought a con -
nection between the south side of the river and the city centre ; the pic-
tures above demonstrate the chall enge facing many footbridges as part of
its rol e as a landmark and in urban renewal: they must provide a response
to compl et ely differ ent urban situation s at each shore. The offices of
Fost er Associat es and Arup were able to meet this challenge with their
competition laureat e, slend er structure.
The first bridge built in London since Tower Bridge in 1894 - and
the first pedestrian bridge - was requi red to be techni cally refined in the
pr esence of th e new millennium. The bridge is 330 m long with a cent ral
span of 144 m and a deck width of 4 m. It has been referred to as "prob-
ably the most delicate susp ension bridge of our time". The shallow cable
sag accentuates this effect . The ratio of span to sag is here 60, wher eas
for a normal ratio for suspension bridge is IO! This gr eatly affects its cost,
due to the much higher cabl e forc es . The inclination of th e hangers
makes the bridge suscept ible to lateral oscillations . Th e bridge was
closed, as mentioned above, due to high lat eral vibration through
pedestrian excitation (see "sailor's roll", P: 101) . The problem dis -
appeared only after th e installation of numerous damper s.
Connections and vibration dampers
Wells, Pearman , 2002, pp. 86-89;
Millennium Br idge, London:
problems and solutions, in: The
Structural Engineer. 17 April
200 1, 11. 8 vol . 79
The viewfromtheTate Modern, theapproach ramps becomean observation deck - span 144 rn, total length 370 m, cablesag 2.30 m 169
170 The Call for Symbols
The contrasting formof each side of the bridge isanessential part of the design
36 4m
5.4 m
db dcutsche bauzeitung. 20 0 3,
pp. )8-45
1.1 m
0.7 m
Memorial Bridge in Rijeka, Croatia, 2003
In Rijeka, some 50 km sout h of Tri este, Ital y, this bridge serve s as
memorial to the recent viol ent hi story of th e Balkans. The reserved sym-
boli sm of th e br idge shapes a piece of th e urban environment without be-
coming too visually brazen . The approach that begins in th e historic cit y
centre cont inues over the river to th e former port, whi ch has been mad e
into a cit y park. The structure is 47 m long with a free span of 35.7 m.
The vertical 3.15 m and 1.15 m wid e upright con cr et e slabs proj ect to a
height of 12m. The deck consists of a closed box section in steel , an alu-
minium plat e surfacing, and railings from safety glass with wood en hand-
rails . A specially designed cr ane was used to place th e 150 t deck; th e ebb
of the tid e help ed to allow th e deck to pass below two exist ing st r uct ures .
The concre te pil es below th e abutments exte nd 17m int o th e soil. Parti -
cular attenti on was paid to the details and surfacing.
The structure reminds one of the small but famous st one br idge
from 1566 in Mostar, whi ch was sens elessl y destroyed during the 1993
Balkan War; it was re constructed for symbolic reasons and inaugurated
in 2004.
Symbolic bridgescan almost only beimagined wit htheatrical lighting systems
171
172 The Call for Symbols
l
I I
IF
3.2 m
Footbridge over Lake Zurich near Rapperswil , Switzerland, 2000
Walther Bieler is a timber const r ucti on specialist ; without intimate
knowledge of th e mat eri al , one should not attempt to build such a br idge.
The 84 1m long wooden footbri dge over Lake Zurich was inte nded t o re-
vit alize the cent ur ies old pilg r image Route of St James. It should be said
thi s goal has been met given th e sometimes t en thousand daily visit ors,
most of whom are not pilgrims. The path is an event , th e bridge is not
expressive, simply a reserved sign of the extraordinary path. Seati ng and
viewing sills denote th at ped estrians mu st stop and look ar ound: th e sur -
roundings ar e simply beautiful. 233 oak piles support th e 2.4 m wid e deck.
The pil es wer e driven into t he lakeb ed and then cut to th e appropriate
height ; the lengths vary between 9 and 16 m, with diameters of 36 to 70
ern, and they ar e spaced 7.,) m apart . The deck lies approximatel y I. ') m
above the lake and consists of steel secti ons that ar e hot -dip galvaniz ed
and powd er coate d with a mi caceous iron or e. The sections lie transver se
to the deck on th e pil es. Continuous t imber beams lie 1 em apart from
one another and ar e stabilized every 2.,) m by st eel bra cket s. With its
asymmetric profile, th e footbridge causes the user to take a more suit-
able, slower pace . No lighting is provided for t he footbridge, as wildlife
ar e protect ed in this nature re serve .
The pilgrim'spathway with a high wall toward theprotected natural sanctuary
173
174 The Call for Symbols Arches - 1888vertical, 1997 inclined
Butterfly Bridge in Bedford, UK, 1997
Cr eating a symbolic gesture with a footbr idge is not limited to ur-
ban situations, where a fun ctional improveme nt of an urban zone is t o be
expressed. A footbridge can send a symbolic message even in th e most
beautiful natural or garden enviro nment. The ar chitect s of Wilki nson
Eyre and the engineers of Jan Bobrowski and Partner s won the 199 .S" com-
petition for thi s footbr idge, beating 78 competi t ors. A park and a festival
site re quired that 32m of the Ouse be bridged ; it could have been done
more simply, but that's not t he point . The two inclined arches t r uly re -
semble insec t wings from afar. As one app roa ches, the arches seem to
lure passers -by with an invit ing, sympat hetic gesture. They are not
connec te d overhead , leaving t he sky open above the deck. The design is
complet ely arbitrary, and refl ects the adjac ent brid ge by J.J. Webster ,
built in 1888. Both ar ches ar e st able due to th eir rig id fixati on at the abut-
ments. The bending moments transferred t o the abutments from each
side cance l one another out and do not load the superstructure. The hori-
zonta l for ces from the hangers at each side are also equal and opposed.
Th e presence of the bridge is further accentuated by th e professionally
developed lighting design, a requir ement for all such symbolic bridges . Pearce, 20 02, pp. 200- 20 3
32 m
176 The Call for Symbols View towards Weil am Rhein
Rhine Bridge inWeil amRhein, Germany, and Huningue, France, 2007
248m
Stairsand rampsonthe Weil amRhein sidewith aviewt oward Huningue 177
A st r uc t ure bridging a border between t wo co untries is by nature
symbolic. In Europ e, st ill searching for politi cal identit y, suc h struc -
t ures are co nsi dered par ti cul arl y important and wor t h any additional
effor t to make t he m suita ble for their ro les. T he Rhine Bridge in Kchl -
hcirn (see p. lOS) demon strat es the diffic ulti es t hat ar ise wh en func t iona l
re quirements are pr ior iti sed above design . In Weil am Rh ein , a co mpe -
tition was held to a footbridge between Fra nce and Germany to prov ide
acc ess to a sho pping centre and re place fer r y t r affi c across t he r iver.
Feichtinger Architects with Leon hard t , Andra an d Par t ner we re awar-
de d t he commission. T heir project was a steel arc h bri dge wi t h a span of
230 m over t he Rhi ne. The bridge deck acts as a t ension member, so t hat
ess ent ially on ly ver t ical forc es wo uld be t ran sferred t o th e abut me nts.
Th e position oft he st r uc t ure is set fr ee by the visual ax is of the asy mme-
tric arc h st r uct ure. The asy mmetry is obvious : the northern arch is
recogn izabl y heavier and co nsis ts of t wo hexagon al t ub e sec t ions; the
circ ular t ub e of the sout hern arc h leans on the northern one. The form
of t he arch was corrected according t o aes t hetic criteria. T he origina l
parab ol ic form was consi de red too steep, so t he quar ter point s of th e
arch wer e r ai sed by 40 ern -- it now appears rounder and softer, and more
steady and qu iet when viewe d at an angle. The abut ment s of most such
lar ge bridges ar e ext raordina r ily solid : th e design pr esent ed by Di etmar
Feicht inger and Wol fgang Strobl from Leonh ar dt , Andra and Partner
ca lled t he arc h to be set upon a spat ial truss where t he piers di sapp ear in
t he wat er below. This sys te m solved the sole pr ob lem of find ing a
balance riverbank path ways and bear ings. The approach on the French
side has a lift for whe elc hair user s.
T he span of 230 m makes t his bri dge t he current wo rld r ecord -
holder for arch footbridges, and the ri se of only 23 m was a co nsiderable
engineer ing cha lle nge. The bridge was built in a manner similar to the
Passerell e Simone de Beauvoir in Par is (see p. (44) . The sections of the
br idge nea r t he abutments were built as cant ile ver s, and the 10 0 0 t
ce ntral segment was lifted int o pl ace and suspende d from the cantilevers .
The Rhine was cl osed on II November 2006 for a single ni ght for t he
ere ct ion of t he ce ntral secti on.
The bridge is a symbol of cross-border coexistence ; the r equire-
men t s of both t he Ge rman and Fr en ch co des and standa rds had to be
r espected in the plan ning . The par t icipant s suffe re d under the di scord
of bu reaucr acy.
178 The Call for Symbols
Destroyed Church, Kassel, 1987
Tadashi Kawamata, Bridge and
Archives, Bielefeld, 200J
Temporary Bridge in Mayland, Germany, 2003
At the request of the Moyland Palace Museum, where brothers
Franz Joseph and Hans van der Grinten keep their important collection
of works by their friend Joseph Beuys, Tadashi Kawamata designed the
temporary footbridge for the exhibition Bridoeand Archil-es, which ran
from II May to 26 October, 2003. In cooperation with the engineer
Werner Wiegand and the students of the Dusseldorf Art Academy,
Tadashi Kawamata built a bridge connecting the first floor of the palace
with the gate fortification building that housed the exhibition. The result
was a fascinating, transparent but voluminous footbridge, supported by
a steel structure with suspension system clad in timber. As the structure
only existed for the summer and early autumn of 2003 , the project was
documented in drawings and a series of photographs by Leo van der Kleij,
who has photographed Kawamata's work for years.
The Japanese artist Tadashi Kawamata continues to examine interi-
or and exterior spaces with his forms from timber planks - similar to
pick-up sticks, they seem random, but of course are not . The structure
echoes his project Destroyed Churchin Kassel 1987 . Kawamata's bridges
perform their obvious function while expanding the spatial experience.
The influences of Walter Benjamin's passage works are noticeable.
Thered arch wasalso spectacularly set in scene at night
179
1 m
23.5 m
The fir st Archit ela urwoche was held in Munich 12- 21 Jul y 2002 : th e
publi c was t o be made awar e t hat th e examinat ion of ar chit ecture is im-
por t ant for e\ 'er yone , It was clear t hat some t hing mu st he st aged in th e
publ ic space in t he ce nt ra l ex hibit ion ar ea . Ar chite ct Pet er Hai merl and
engineers Biel meier & Wenzl create d a fir e-r ed arch footbri dge based on
a con cept hv Matthi as Cast orph, r ising from street level to t he fir st floor
of t he cx hihit ion hal l.
Glued t imh er beams - si milar to a bow - we re used for t he sup-
porti ng spine of t he st r uct ure . The cross sect ion (lI Ox 30 em) is constant
along th e tota l length and can be shor t ene d t o any length . This is impor-
t ant as, after th e Archit ekt urwoch e , t he hr idge was to provide a cr oss ing
wit h a span some 7 m shorter over t he Ri edb ach cree k in Viechtach.
A suppor t ing st r uct ure wit h galvan ized rectangular profil es made t hi s
possihlc.
Temporary Bridge for Archit ekt urwoche A1, Munich, Germany, 2002
Play Stations
Man is only wholly a man when he is playinq. Friedrich Schiller, Letters Upon the Aesthetic Education of Man
Moveable bridges are not modern inventions. Already long before
Van Gogh, traffic systems and routes had to be bridged so that neither
traffic flow interfered with the other. Building bridges at an elevation
that allowed clearance for ship masts would be absurd. A second reason
would be the fear of attackers: the ancients already had drawbridges for
their fortresses.
Faustus Verantius (1551-1617) was also naturally familiar with the
problem of moveable bridges (see p. 34). Trade boycotts and military
strategy led Napoleon to go an easily reversible route at the end of the
r Sth century: during the construction of the Grand Canal du Nord that
was to connect the Rhine and Maas between Venlo and Neuss, and then
in the direction of Antwerp, Napoleon had II moveable bridges con-
structed. However, he then annexed and controlled the Dutch ports,
making the bridges unnecessary. The Pont Transbordeur in Marseilles
is legendary, a transporter bridge from 1905.
There are many situations in which there is no other choice than to
lift, rotate or flip a bridge. These days, this cannot really be accom-
plished without the aid of a mechanical engineer, when public bridges
have to be moveable, and preferably by remote control. The movement
becomes a spectacle, but comes with a certain technical investment and
normally costs more than a fixed bridge. There seems to be no limit to
the inventiveness of the mechanical engineers, especially when they are
working in cooperation with structural engineers and architects.
The selected projects considered here are only a fraction of the design
possibilities of small footbridges.
One aspect that a book can unfortunately demonstrate only indi-
rectly, and that plays an important but often overlooked roll in the de-
sign of moveable bridges: their noise. They clap, grind, squeak, crack,
snap, buzz - as with barking dogs, the loudest bridge is usually the
smallest. The noise and movement are an allure for the designer. The
bridge becomes a type of toy - as everything that moves and makes noise
creates enjoyment and wakes the child in anyone.
182 PlayStations
Many shipspass through t he bridge portal daily.
Folding bridgeat Firth of Kiel, Germany, 1997
It is a pri vilege for a city t o be on th e wat er and be th e site of int er -
nat ionally recogni zed saili ng events . On the ot her hand, wat erways sub-
ject t o high traffic can be as mu ch as a swat h through th e urban fabri c as
a highway or railway. The challenge is to make a vir tu e of necessit y. Kiel ,
a beautiful cit y on the Balti c Sea, is divided into east and west by t he
Fir t h of Kiel. I n the early ' 990S, the Scandi navian ferries wanted t o move
to th e less sought-afte r easte rn area, they firs t waited for a bridge t o be
const ru cte d [ 2 0 m over th e wat er leading west. To allow fer r ies and
yachts t o pass, the br idge was required t o be effor tl essly moveable. The
head of th e plann ing offi ce sugges t ed a folding br idge wi th three sect ions.
This was const r uct ed by the engineers ofSchlaich Bergerma nn and Par t -
ner and the ar chi tec ts von Gerkan Marg und Partner. In the closed posi-
tion, th e bridge is a classic, one-sided cable- st ayed br idge with a 26 m
span and a wi dt h of" m, suppor te d t o each side by two cables . Th e deck
has ar t iculat ions at the t hird points of t he deck and can th er efore fold
t ogether as th e cables are tensioned upward . This not only makes the mo-
vement of the bridge int er esting, but also decr eases the surface ar ea for
wind loading. To ensure a robust, low-maintenance syste m - the bridge
must open about ten times a day - a simple pull ey syste m was devel oped
rather th an a complex hydraulic or elect romec hanical syste m. During
opening, all th e moveable cables , th e main stay cables and an add iti onal
cable for t he movement of the front of th e superst r uct ure, are cont rolled
by one cable reel turning at a consta nt rat e. This does not need to be syn-
chronized wi t h ot her systems. The rest of t he movement is cont ro lled by
a second cable roll r unning at a constan t torque, whi ch pulls both pylons
back so th at the folded br idge has enough clearance. It is an astonis hingly
simple system for such a complex foldi ng mot ion. Openi ng or closing of
t he br idge ta kes about two minutes.
Leicht, wei t , 2004 . pp. 26o- 26J;
Knippers. Jan andSchleich,
Jorg. FoldingMechanism of
the Kiel Horn Footbridge,
Germany, in: Structura l
Enginl'ering lntcr national ,
1, 20 0 0 , p. ) 0
Mechanical engineers are necessary for the design of such structures 183
Fro m th e beginning, th e const r ucti on of the bridge was acc ompanied by
local politi cal ar guments th at are always detriment al to th e work of de-
sign engineers. The innovation th at is at t he heart of th e str uct ure unl or-
tunat ely played littl e role in th e debate .
85m 8.3 m 8.9m 9.7m 124 ml
184 Play Stations The suspension cable liftsthe deck upward, the shipping clearance isthereby increased by 8.1 m
Katzbuckel Bridge in Duisburg, Germany, 1999
Europe's largest inland port consists of a wid e, ent angled network
of harbour bas ins that exte nd into industrial zones. As part of the conver -
sion of an industrial zone, an interior harbour was to be bridged to con-
nect the park of the historic cit y cent re with a new park ar ea. The foot -
bridge was to be 3.5 m with a span of 74 m, and be able to be lifted to
allow large ships to pass. A suspension bridge, designed by Schlai ch
Bergermann and Partner, is suspend ed from four 20 m high st eel tube
masts (d=419 mm). The movement of the deck takes advant age of th e
principl e th at the vertical sag of a taut cable decreases gr eatly as a result
of a small horizontal displacement of its bearings . Shortening of the back-
stay cabl es by 3m with hydraulic cyli nders causes the top of the masts to
tilt 1.7 m to the out side . This in turn causes the bridge deck to ri se 8.10 m,
creati ng a Katzbuckel - the German t erm refers to the bowing of a eat 's
spin e. The increased cur vat ure of the deck would normally produce
large bending moments - so the deck is conceived as a seri es of shor t ar t i-
culate d members acting similarly t o chai n links. The deck becomes 3.65
m longer as it is pulled upward. Additional deck eleme nt s are pulled from
a chamber in th e abutment as the structure ris es. The movement appears
spec t acular, as it should. A lighting syst em was developed t o emphasize
the motion of the deck - unfortunately th is has been out of operation for
some t ime .
73.7 m
Leicht , wei t, 2004, pp. 264-267
Articulation requires appropriatedetailing 185
186 Play Stations
The bridge can beinclined within seven minutesto allow shipsto pass
Millennium Bridge in Gateshead, UK, 2001
This spectacu lar st r uct ure complet es a series of bridges construc-
t ed over th e cent ur ies over t he Tyne between Gat eshead and Newcastl e.
The Millennium Bridge was to be somet hing speci al and to st and out
again st t he det erior ati on of th e r iverbank area. A cur ved bridge deck
with par aboli c arch creates an impressive form. The fact that th is form
is moveab le cre ates th e true spectacle : th e m span, m pair of
arches ro t ate about a common abutment . The 30 m wid e shipping lane
has a clearance of m.
The architect s of W ilki nson Eyr e and t he engineers of Gifford &
Partners beat ot her compet it ors with t hei r idea of two ar ches - one
forming th e deck, t he other th e supporting arch - rot ating about t he
suppo r t to provide th e necessary ship clearance . Th e opening is cer t ainly
a spect acle , but th e closed bridge is also impressively beautiful. The
erect ion of t he bridge can be viewed on th e Int ernet. A 90 m long Asian
Hercu les II swimming crane transported th e st r uct ure 8 km from it s
manu fact urer to th e const r uct ion site, where it was pl aced preci sely t o
th e mi llimetre. The st r uc t ure is not exactl y economi cal: due to t he
expe nses of t ranspor t , t he engi ne of rotat ion and th e bearing, th is bridge
becom es the most expe nsive of all expe nsive bridges.
Cont r ar y to a balanced bridge wit h a count er weight , which is easy
t o move, th e Millennium Bridge required heavy mot ors that were able t o
push as well as pull, as t he cent re of gravity of t he struct ure moves over
t he axi s of ro t at ion. The hydraulic jacks at both abutments can each
cr eate a compr ession for ce of 10, 000 KN and a t ension force KN,
all owing th e st ru ct ure to ope n even under heavy wind.
Such an incre dible mach ine , whi ch is cons t antl y in serv ice, cannot
simply be hidden in th e dark of night . From th e beginn ing, th e engines
we re th erefore part of th e light ing system that th eatrica lly accentuates
t he arch st r uct ure and its refl ecti ons in th e wat er below.
Curran. Peter , Gat cshccd
MUll-onium Bridge, UK,
in: St r uctural Enginc(' ring
International, 4.. 2001, pp. 214 -2 16
The bridgemovement isanevent; the abutment, an engine room
8.2 m
187
188 Play Stations The bridge girder islifted by 32cables
Coupure Bridge in Bruges, Belgium, 2002
For onc e, it was not th e new millennium th at called for a reno va-
tion of an urban zone. Bruges was el ect ed th e 2002 Cultural Capital of
Europe and used th e opportunity to cr eat e a continuous network of paths
for cyclists and pedestrians throughout the city of canals . As part of thi s
proj ect , a bridge was necessary over th e Coupure Canal. The structure
was to be moveab le to allow ships from the city to cro ss to the Ghent-
Ost end Canal via the Coupure Can al. The Swiss engi nee r Jiirg Con zett
design ed a vertical lift bridge with a lightweight 2.5 m wide deck for pe-
destrians and cyclists . The deck plat e is suspended from two stationary
steel tubes 6 m above the deck, wh ich can rot at e about their axes. In
order to lift the superstructure, the 17hanger cables to each side are wound
around the steel tubes like to a coil. The bridge can be opened with little
for ce, as the deck onl y moves up and down and stays in place. The sup-
ports for the tubes at the top of th e plate-shaped pillars have an elasti c
pr ecamber at the midspan. Two bearings are th erefore necessary parallel
to t he longitudinal axis of th e deck at the head of each pilla r. The outside
bearing pulls the tube downward th er eby creating the precamber. To ro-
tate th e tube, it had to be complet ely straight . Th e elastic restraint at the
capit als of the pillars was the on ly way to avoid defl ections of the tubes.
The sleeves that hous e the hanger cables during rotation ar e welded with
double fillet welds to both sides and a wat ertight connection to th e sup -
porting tube. The motors ar e hous ed in the two southern pillars and are
hidd en under moveable cover ings. This bridge form seems primal , with
th e mechanics of it s movement . The material chos en for the pilla r s and
th e surfacing is remini scent of th e Flemish building t radition. The
Coupurc Bridge shows its yout h mostly in the fine execut ion of detail.
2.9m
4.75 m
Struct ur e as Space, 2006 ,
P: 24 1and p. 298
dh deutschc bauzeitung. !l. rooj,
pp.46-n
The bridge acts like a ratati on switch and rotates along wi t h the pedestrians on the deck. 189
Ryck Bridge in Greifswald, Germany, 2004
Volkwin Marg and Schl aich Ber germann and Partner design ed th e
Ryck Bridge in th e mus eum por t as a sma ll swing bridge. The marit ime
charac te r of t he st r uct ure, wi th it s high mast and two dia gon al st iffeni ng
spa rs, is inconspi cuou sly inco r po rate d int o it s sur ro und ings. The ce nt r al
m, moveable portion of th e bridge is st iffene d by two incl ined t ension
stays - t o pr ovid e th e necessar y st rengt h when open and subjec t t o
cant ilever ing moment s. T he tension me mbe rs are design ed so th at no
bearing forces du e to sel f-weight ar e transferred t o th e fixed brid ge
approach. Only aft er t he applicat ion of suppleme ntary live loads do ver t i-
cal beari ng forces appea r at t his int erface . The tension rod s are sus pe n-
ded from a ste el tube mast , which is fixed t o th e deck and create s an ax is
of rot ati on . The deck, mast and ten sion rod s rot at e abo ut t he foo t ing and
are suppor te d by a rotati ng assembly. Thi s asse mbly t r ansfers all forces
in op en and closed sta tes to th e st eel re inforce me nt at th e head of th e
pier and onwa r d t o th e pil es below. Two incli ned spars anc hore d int o t he
qua y wall sta bili ze th e head of th e mast. Th e spars act as th e backst avs of
a cable -st ayed brid ge when close d. When th e bridge is open and t he deck
swung to th e side, t he spa rs and mast crea te a sta ble t r ipod - and on e of
t he spars is subject to compression . A hyd rauli c cyli nde r with elect ro nic
cont ro l pro vides th e moto r.
a i'8fS
190 Play Stations
Rolling Bridge in London, UK, 2006
At noon ever y Friday, t his small bridge is unroll ed in th e middle of
London but in a hidden site . On Nort h Wharf St reet in Paddington, a
gentlema n arr ives with a compute r cont ro l and sets th e bridge in motion
with a simple touch of a button. It is th e work of arc hite ct s Heatherwick
Studio and th e enginee rs SKM Anthony Hu nt s. In a geome trically ingen-
iou s moti on, sta r t ed by very qui et hydrauli cs, th e bridge roll s out over
like a small cate r pilla r over a span of 12 m. To ope n the bridge, a sma ll
pi ece of th e handrail is elevate d over each of th e seven suppo r t ing ele-
ments. Th e arti st ic ide a, knowledge of civil engi neer ing and st r uctura l
design are re markably united in th e project.
The bridge is used often, but for which pap er ships th e br idge is
op en ed every Fr iday at noon rem ain s a myst ery. Decad ent ? No, th e child
in all of us loves to pl ay and such ext r avagance is a welcome diversion .
The motion of th e bridge remains in th e memor y as some t hing extraordi -
nary. The designer obviously spared no pains for such a st r uct ure .
Smooth bridge motion requiresanexcessiveattention to detail
191
192 Play Stations
Leer, Bascule bridge, D, 2006
Moveable Bridges Moveable bridgesarenow much morethan
the military drawbridgesof the past. Themedieval
drawbridgesthat protected castles and fortresses
havebeenreplaced by bridgesthat performthe
more peaceful function of enablingdifferent flows
of traffi c to cross.
Moveable bridgesareoften over waterways,
andarethe typical solutionwhen providing the
necessary clearance for traffic passing below
would meana very expensi ve high bridgewit h
complicated ramps, stairwaysor lifts. In these
cases, moveable bridges may be moreeconomical,
in spiteof increased constructionand maintenance
costs, which areoften twicethosefor a fixed
bridgewit h the same geometry.
Moveable bridgesareone of the most fasci-
nating fieldsof construction, asstructural and
mechanical engineering isnecessary for the system
changes during opening. This leads to an inter-
disciplinary design process. Asfootbridgesare often
lighter than their roadand railwaycounterparts,
they areeasier to move. This section discusses the
many typesof movement for the structuresand
the challenges involvedin designingsuch bridges.
Bascule bridge wit h armof balance Bascule bridge Greifswald, Wiecker Bridge, 1887 193
I [
Types
The classic moveable bridgesarethe draw-
bridge and bascule bridges. A drawbridge will
often bedesignedwit h an armof balance.
A counterweight isused for thisaswell asfor t he
bascule bridgesystem, sothat the bridge'scentre
of gravity coincideswith the axisof rotation for all
positions of the structure. The mechanism of rota-
tion thus hasonly frictional forcesto overcome, so
that t hese bridgesmay even be moved by hand.
The superstructureof t he drawbridgewith
an armof balanceisa simply supported beam. In
theclosed state, the bridge deck restson t hefar
abutment and in the open stateislifted fromthe
abutment by tension membersat eachside of the
deck. Asa function of the dominant traffic flow, a
light overbalance isprovided so that the struct ure
wi ll automatically open or close if necessary.
A locking mechanism isthereby necessary for
every stateof rotation. The Dutch drawbridgewas
made famousby Van Gogh's painting. The Wieker
Bridge in Greifswald, Germany isopened by hand.
The structurewas built and 1886and isstill in ser-
vice. A morecontemporary exampleist he Amts-
grabenBridge built in 1997 in Berlin K6penick.
Bascule bridgesalsorotate about a horizon-
tal axis. This horizontal axis liesnearthe bridge's
cent reof gravity, thereby dividing the bridge into
a fore and an aft arm. Basculebridgesareoften
moved by a downward motion of the aft span.
The fore span isoften longer t han the aft, which is
often designedwith a counterweight to minimize
the energy of rotation. The moment of rotat ion
from t heaft span under full liveload cannot ex-
ceed the dead load moment of the fore spa n so
that t he bridge will not suddenly open. Theabut-
ments must be quite wide and deep to provide
enough space for t he rotation of the counter-
weight. Theflood protection of t hecounter-
weight chamber must betaken into account in
the design. The opening of t he bascule bridge
doesnot interfere wit h any neighbouring surface
in plan.
Descriptionsof the many variat ionsof bas-
culebridges can befound in the lit erature. The
many ot her types of moveable bridge can only be
cursorily described here.
- Swing bridge: Rotation about a vertical
axiscreatessymmetrical loading of the foundat i-
on. Thisadvantage must beweighed up against
the additional surfacenecessary for the st ruct ure
(see p. 189).
- Vert ical lift bridge: Thissystem does not
require a change in structural system, simplifying
the design of the foundations. A simply supported
girder is lift ed up. Theoret ically, pedestrianscan
stay on the bridgewhile it opens. Thegreat disad-
vantage of t hisst ructure is itslimited vertical clea-
rance. Thiscan beavoided by having the bridge
lowered to t he keel depth of the ship, asopposed
to lifting the structure. Thissolut ion isuncommon
due to increased corrosion protection and polluti-
on of the deck. TheKatzbuckel Bridge in Duisburg
(see p. 184) isthistypeof structure.
- Rolledand sliding bridges: These are
seldomused due to large space requirements.
- Folding bridges: These structures require
little additional space. Due to the complicated
mechanical mechanicsnecessary, they are seldom
used (see p. 182).
194 Play Stations Swing
- ---
\
\
-- -
VerticaI lift
I
I
Transporter Pontoon Folding
- Telescoping bridges: These aresimilar to
thefolding bridges. These aremostly seen asair-
port fingers. Theengineersat Atelier Oneplanned
a43 mlong telescoping bridgefor the Rolling
Stones' 1997Bridges to Babylontour (see p. 243).
Passenger bridges: These are used for
the passage from the quay to a ship. These canbe
verti cally movedat the free end to adjust to the
water level.
Portable bridges: These areoft en pon-
toons used for temporarystructures, oft en military,
in areaswit h poor soils. To allow shipspass, a sec-
tion of the bridge must be detached and floated to
the side. Temporary bridgescanbe made solightly
with moderncomposite materials that they can be
flown in by helicopter. A curiousexample isthe
Back Pack Bridge (see p. 231)
Transporter bridges: Seldom useddue to
their limited capacity.
Thechoice of moveable bridge typeisdeter-
mined by the local framework condit ions. The re-
quiredclearance dictateshow much the opened
bridge must keep free in the vertical direction as
well asthe horizontal distanceto the banks. The
frequencyof opening will havean influenceon the
typeof motor. Some bridgesarerequired to be
opened several timesdaily under full wind loads
and in anyweat her situation, while many are
opened only a few timesa year. In situations
wherecorrosivesaltwater maycomeinto contact
with the bridge, it maybeadvantageousto sitethe
motor compartment well abovethewater level.
Secondary responsibilitiesmust alsobetaken into
account: If the bridge's movement isto be
dramaticallyset in scene, the planner isfree to
demonstrate technical advances in the control,
mechanical and material technology, andtryout
new bridge forms. Thebridgeson the pages 182
to 191 areexamplesof this.
Thedesigner isgenerallyfree in the choice
of building materials, alt hough most decks areof
lightweight material in order to save the demands
on the motor and t he counterweight. Grid decks
have the advantage of providing natural drainage
and allow t he wait ing pedestriansto view through
the deck while opened.
Steel ismost oft en used asa counterweight due
to shortageof space, assteel requireslessvolume
t han the moreeconomical concrete, t he density of
which isa third of that of steel.
Design (Motor, Loads)
Moveablebridgesmust of course bede-
signed for all st rengt h and service requirements in
all positions: open, closed, and in transition. Wind
loading isoften high on the structurewhile it is
open. Swingandvertical transport bridgesmay be
subject to live loadswhile in motion. The driveme-
chanism, locking mechanism and controlsmust be
designed, aswell asmechanical bearingsor pulley
ropes. These components are outside of the realm
of experience for the designer of a fixed bridge.
Dynamics, mechanical tolerances, and phenomena
such asplay and wear makethedesignof a move-
able bridge a highly challenging experience.
Several drivemechani smsareoften installed
in large bridges: a main drivesystem, a supplemen-
tary drive systemfor rare casesof capacity over-
load, and a manual drive systemfor repairsand
emergencies. Usually, the mechanismisdesigned
only for the movement of the bridge, and is not
loaded in the closed position when the bridge sits
on fixed bearings. The locking devices alsorequire
a drivesystem. Asmentioned for bascule bridges,
changes in struct ural system occur during motion.
For systemswith two cantileversmeetingat the
centre of the deck, pins may be used to transfer
shear between cant ileversand avoid off set of the
deck sections.
All early bridgeswere moved by hand.
Hydraulicdriveappeared in the beginning of the
19t h century. Electric motors have beenused since
the beginning of t he20th century. Pneumatic or
combustion enginesare not known to be used.
Hydraulic drivestoday work wit h oil pressure cylin-
ders, ascanbe seen in bucket excavators. The
hydraulicpower unit canbesafely sitedon landin
a machine room. The bridge merely housesthe
hydraulic cylindersand piping. Itsmotion iscon-
t inuousand noiseless. A similar spatial separation
between drive unit and motor isnot possiblefor
electrically driven systems. Theelectric drive unit is
housed on the bridgeand t ransfers power by
cables, gears, belts, cog-railsor shafts. Thisallows
a greater distance of motion. With an elect ric drive
system, thereis no danger of leakage in the
Arching Telescopi ng Tilt ing bascule Passenger br idge Swing bridge 195
I'
r-
1-----------\ \
I"
\
:--J
<J-- -(>
==1
FtU
hydraulic t ubing. Precision landing of t he deck is
ext remely difficu lt due to temperature expansion,
wi nd and dynamic loading. The to lerances of the
st ructure must be chosen generously enough to
prevent Jamming. At t -ie same t ime, t he bridge
must be locked in the closed state so that there
is no play, and to avoid impact s at t he bearings
leading t o increased wear. A distinction must be
made between standing and floating cables.
By the regularly moved and dynami cally loaded
floating cables, fat igue leads to cable failure at
loads well below the stat ic breaking st rength .
The mechanical engineer ing standa rds require
t hat cables be replaced according t o service life,
type and level of loading, diameter cable and
bending radius.
There is a danger of t he user becoming
caught in the bridge or falling from t he deck
during opening and closing. It is for these reasons
t hat ow ners and codes often require barriers,
gates, and optica l and audio warn ings. These
necessary elements can great ly aff ect the visual
impact of the structu re and must be taken int o
account at the earliest stages of design. It must
also be determ ined who wi ll operate t he bridge .
Boat captains may t hemselves disembark and
operat e smaller, seldom frequen ted bridges above
canals. A bridge keeper is necessaryin crit ical
cases.
The planner and owner should consider
allowing the cont ractor to opt imize the drive sys-
t em, and to invit e tende rs f or the design of t he
mechanical system. This allows Important det ails
to be worked out toge t her wi t h a mechanical
consultant in the const ruct ion documents phase.
It must however clearly be laid out in the specif i-
cations t hat not only t he mechanical aspects of
t he contracts be f ulfi lled but also t he formal -
opt ical and acoustic - requirements . In any case,
wit h the mult itude of challenges ment ioned
above, t he struct ural engineer may quickly f ind
his or her limits, and wo uld be advised to Invite a
mechanical engineer int o t he design t eam. This
previously rare coope rat ion opens up a great
poten t ial fo r innovatio n.
Fischer, Manfred, Stahlhau-Handbuch, Band2, Stahlkonst r uktioncn,
Kalil,
Dietz, Wilhelm, Dcr Bruckcnbau, Handbu ch der
Ingenicurwissenschaftcn, II. vol. , 4. Abteilung Bewcglichc Bruckcn.
Ld pzig, 1907
Schatz, Lllrike, Bcwcglichc Fuf3gangcrbrut'k('n, Dipl omarbcit , lick,
University of Stuttgart, September 200 1
Schlaich, Mike ct al.. Guidel ines for the design of foothri dges, fib,
federation internationalc du bct on , bullet in p , Lausanne ,
November 20 0 5'
Landscape, Gardens
If this isn't nice, what is? Kurt Vonnegut, Timequake
Gardens, parks and landscapes remain the reserve of pedestrians,
where motorized traffic has no place. But not all pedestrians are the
same: strollers enjoy ambling along beautiful flowers, walkers escape
the city, and hikers audaciously explore the most removed areas. Every
now and again, a footbridge creates a moment of personal reflection.
The demands on such structures could not be more different. Bridges in
parks are seen as manmade ornaments that should theatrically emphasize
the surrounding natural beauty a tradition continuing since the r Sth
century. In an open landscape, more reserve is required to avoid
dominating the surrounding environment. In high-altitude regions, the
bridge plays a role of assistance to the experienced climber. One must be
free from a fear of heights to cross a deep mountain canyon as the deck
slats clatter under one's feet and a sole cable at chest height provides
safety. As in many high alpine regions, this should only be recommended
for experienced climbers.
Patent remedies should be avoided for bridges in beautiful natural
environments just as for more urban structures. Every site wants to
have its material, topographic and atmosphere qualities analysed and not
have the spirit of the place degraded. All materials timber, stone, con-
crete, steel, glass can be appropriate on their own or in combination.
Every structural form wants to be accounted for -- in its pure form or as
a hybrid. The erection of such structures far from traffic is generally
spectacular, whether they are built using a cableway or a helicopter.
The choice of materials can depend on what can be locally found and is
therefore least expensive.
The seasonal change can more readily affect such structures. Some
bridges are closed in the winter or placed in storage. It is therefore re-
commended to gather information on the structure before any bridge visit.
198 Landscape, Gardens The detailing here also deserves noti ce
Bridge over the River Esk, Scotland, UK, 20th Century
Trails off th e beat en track , normally only visite d by th e occasional
sheep, are a dime a dozen in Engl and and Scotland. The River Esk is in a
region that seems to have evade d building regulations. This sma ll bridge
is in an idyll ic setting, which many nature lovers would defend agains t
th e int r usion of modern civilizat ion or large numbers of tourist s. How
our phot ographer ca me across th e st r uc t ure in these surro unding is a
myst ery, and sho uld st ay one.
Simple, quickl y co ns t r uc te d bridges are life-saver s in areas subj ect
t o natural cat ast ro phes. Toni Ruttimann, "Toni EI Sui zo", has ded icat ed
the last 20 years to th ese st ruct ures. Wi t h the hel p oflocal workers, he
has co ns tr uc te d more than 3 00 bridges wit h spa ns of up to 260 m in areas
suc h as Ecu ad or and Ca mbo dia. Hi s sus pe nsion bridges are built almost
co mpletely wit h don at ed mat erial s, suc h as tubes fro m pip elines given by
oil drilling co mpa nies and r ecycled cables fro m Swiss cable ca rs .
TheRiver Esk near Invermark in Angus, Scotland 199
200 Landscape, Gardens
Glass Bridge in a Private Garden near Nice, France, 2003
A m high canyon was to be br idged on pri vat ely own ed pr operty
in the Haut e Pr ovence. Th e st r uct ure was not to be mor e than just a li ne
in the land scape; the English owner found his arc hi tec t whil e reading a
glass magazin e. The structure was required t o bridge m in a zone ver y
diffi cult to access . Ar chitect Renat e Fehling and engineer Johannes Liess
thought of a footbridge in glass wit h a coherent form crea te d with small ,
easy-t o- t ranspor t elements. Th e res ult: a steel box sect ion curve d in a
radius of 33 m, with a suspension st r uct ure below th e deck that is in one
line in the hori zontal plan. Glass plat es ( 830 x 24 10 mm) cant ilever out
from th e box sect ion consist ing of t hree pan es of glass, one 20 mm TSG
and t wo 12 mm HSG. Should the main pan e fail, th e two remaining ones
would gua rantee the stability of the st ru cture. Asimple sta inless steel
rod with a diamet er of 16 mm serves as a railing. Th e theatri cal approach
to th e deli cat e glass crossi ng is create d wit h the roughl y hewn stone
sur facing at the abut me nts.
Str ucturally, th e footbridge is a par tially fixed , suspen ded torsional
beam on two support s. The beam is st abi lized be th e spatial suspension
syste m below the deck . Th e cant ilever ing beams cause a rotation in one
dir ection and th e suspension syst em crea tes rotation in th e opposit e
direction. Th e construct ion of the abutments was diffi cult . The str uct ura l
design was not carried out under th e normal standards and codes, as it
was considere d an ar twork rath er than a bridge t o suppor t pedestrian
traffic .
Abridgeas a workof art: glasswalkwaywithunilateral railing 201
15 m
202 Landscape, Gardens
Bridge andpark benchcombined into one
Park Bridge in Baruth, Germany, 2004
The small Mark Brandenburg t own Baruth lies abo ut 50 km sout h of
Berli n. The zu Solms famil y had Pet er -Joseph Len ne build th e park ther e
in 1838 . The famil y fled to Sout h Afri ca fro m the Nazis, and since then
the local farmer s have suffere d from land drainage and the Park has r un
t o seed. In 204 , design competi t ions wer e held for five new 6 to 8 m long
bridges on th e site as part of a cultural proj ect. The timber bridge showed
here was th e fir st of th ese st r uct ures.
The idea behind thi s wooden sculpture is sur pr isingly simple. For m
and st r uct ure ar e not directl y related to one anot her, as it seems t o have
been mad e from a lightweight formabl e foil pull ed up from th e deck .
This form is cre ated by rigid oak slat s, making the st r uct ure very stable.
The slats are create d from 48 mm thi ck oak planks that wer e sawed using
a t empl at e and fixed t o the st r uct ure below with st ainless ste el bolt s.
Ever v t enth plank is anchore d down. The wood has qui ckl y t aken on a
silver -grey patina, but thi s change in colour docs not affect its st r uct ural
sta bilit y.
Ther e is a wonderful view of th e park from th e seat ing area on the
br idge. This st r uct ure signifies the begi nni ng of small, draping park
br idges that lat ch on to th e traditi on of Kew or W6rlit z with th eir
theatricality and rel at ion to nature.
3m
Thesilver grey wooden boards become part of the parklandscape 203
204 Landscape, Gardens
Park Bridge in Sophienholm, Denmark, 1993
The Soph ienholm Park north of Co pe nhagen plays a unique rol e in
th e hi story of Dani sh gar dens . The park began in the ixth centur y as a
romantic garden in th e st yle of Ramee, but th e park has had many owner s
since and has see n many changes . Sophienholm was built as th e count ry
seat ofTheodor Holmskjold in 1] 69, and ser ves today as an exhibit ion
hall for modern art . The arti st s I-1 ein Hei nsen and th e arc hitect Torben
Schonherr creat ed a new obser vati on pl atform for the park in 1993. This
small br idge was created as part of this ex pansion in coope rat ion with
th e engi nee r Eri k Reit zel. It connects th e main path with t he obs ervation
platform, where one can enjoy a lovely view of th e sea and obser ve a ste el
sculpt ure from many differ ent angl es .
The bridge has a spiral of mo re than 1400: all for ces and tension,
compre ssion, shear, bending and torsion moment s mu st be taken int o
account in th e design . It is debatable whether th e st r uc t ure is a bridge or
a sta ir way - as with Jii rg Co nzet t's Second Tr aver siner Footbrid ge, we
will classify it as a bridge.
Takenouchi, Kyo, The Aesthetics
of Dani sh Bridges, Kopcnhagcn,
1995"
Ring girder andstairway Inone- the bridging of the embankment protectsthe vegetation and sets the stairway in scene
205
206 Landscape, Gardens Not a ski-jump, but rather a secure pathway to the observation point
Observation Bridge in Aurland, Bergen, Norway, 2006
Visit or s t o the Gra nd Canyon ar e led aro und a horseshoe -shap ed
observat ion plat for m br idge cant ilever ing 22 m out above t he canyon. It
can be conside red a failure in t erms of efficient st r uct ural design , as it
ignores the fundamenta ls of ring girder mechanics (as explained in th e
t echn ical overview on p. II6). In Bergen in sout hweste rn Norway, the
number of t ourist s may not be comparable to t he Gra nd Canyon, but th e
view of the fjords are simply t erri fic. Todd Saunders and Tommie
Wilhel msen won t he compet it ion for th is observat ion platform 600 m
above the Sognefjord. The 4-m wid e footbr idge leads 30 m out from solid
ground and could not be more dramati c. The massive railings to th e side
give the user a sense of tot al security; but one may feel a sense of vertigo
as the view st raight ahead lead s t o a void. The swee p of th e bridge is
reminisce nt of a ski jump, and the visitor has to recogn ize the bar ely
notic eable glass barrier at th e end befor e feeling safe and enjoying the
view. Th e bra vest visi tors lean over the glass bar ri er and enjoy th e view to
the bott om . The struct ure is deSigned for heavy wi nds and a snow load of
7 m - Nod e Engi neers from Ber gen wer e th e engineers.
33.6m
/
Sovereign interplay between security andabyss
----_._-
4.3 m
207
208 Landscape, Gardens Steel trusswit h timber cladding
Resting Station in Lillefjord, Norway, 2006
The Germa n expression for the sayi ng "t he grass is always greener
on th e ot her side" lite rally t ran slat es t o "happiness always lies on th e
ot her side of the ri ver ". As if the t her e were not sufficien t beaut y on th is
side , the st ruct ure br idges a r iver not for a pure joy of hiking, but so th at
the visitors can reach an attract ive wate rfall. The park station is a combi-
nati on of seat ing, brid ge, t oil et s, litter bi ns and protecti ve st r uct ure built
by th e Nor wegian Highway Author it y, Pushak ar kite kter merged all of
th ese clements int o a complete st ru ctural sculpt ure , stretc hing over th e
wat er like a lizard . Th e building, br idge and seati ng banks seem as if t hey
ar e product of one holi sti c model , even though the exte r ior ste el truss
dominat es the visual image. The spat ial un it y is create d as the wooden
surface th at covers the building and acts as cladding for the ste el t r uss,
The bank s are not treat ed as furniture and are par t of t he br idge pathway.
The depth of th e recta ngular st eel tubes making up th e st eel t ru ss varies
between 80 and 260 em.
It is striki ng t hat the separat ion between struct ure and envelope
can be useful even for simple t ypes of foot brid ges t hat appear t o be a sing-
le st r uct ure .
185m
A small paradise- still to befound in Europe. Lillefjord 209
h
H
H
H
210 Landscape, Gardens The endof the bridge can hardly beseen - the pathleads to the unknown
Bridge in the protected landscape MaggiaValley, Switzerland, 1997
Th e Maggia Valley is still an insid ers' tip for hikers - but you are no
longer completely alone in this Swiss valley. The bridge in Giumaglio
spans 230 m over the entire floodplain of the river, so that hikers do not
di sturb th e enviro nment below. The transparency of the structure is
imperative, so as disturb the view through the valley as little disturbed as
possible.
The inh erently simple structure, by Fabio Torti I Andreotti &
Partners, Locarno, was conceived in three sections each with a fre e span
of 82.8 m. A long suspension bridge with a sufficiently braced walking
surface, three thin cabl es as railing and handrails to protect pede strians
from the worst, and ever y now and again a bracing guy - that's it. This is
pr ecisely the allure of the bridge: it does not dress itself up in an attempt
to compete with the beauty of the landscape. The bridge swings of
course, so you can' t be squeamish. Hopping and jumping create move-
ment in the st ructure, but the bridge' s flexibility makes it very stable .
The view downward steers one's attention to different sections of
th e floodplain. The structure is similar to the walkways above archaeo-
logical sites; it protects the natural surroundings whil e offering views of
the beauty and complexity of the environme nt. One cannot see both
ends of the bridge from any point of th e deck, so that one idyllic surprise
after another awaits the user.
Vegetation and landscapechange constantly below the bridge, theview below alow the hiker to experiencethis 211
212 Landscape, Gardens
Second Traversiner Footbridge, Viamala, Switzerland, 2005
Aft er th e first Tr aver siner Foot br idge was dest r oyed by a falli ng
boulder (see p. 122 ) a second bri dge was built only two years lat er with
help of communal and privat e investment : the Viamala hiking t rail is too
beauti ful to st op her e. The new sta irway bridge, with a free span of 56.6 m,
connec ts the trail. Th e diagonal length of t he bridge is 61.2m and t he
main suspension cable is 95 m long.
Inspired by th e t opography, the Jiirg Conze t t and Rolf Bachofner
decided on a pr estressed cable truss in two parallel and vertical plan es.
The challenge : the two cable anchorages are at different height s and the
deck leads from a lower approach upwards to th e oppos ite cli ff. Diagonal
cables ar e st ressed between the main suspension cables and th e deck. To
find t he form of the cable, th e positi on of the cable clamps, and th e
lengt h of th e secondary cables , we require the help of graphic str uct ural
analysis and a Cre mona diagr am . Jiirg Co nzett is well ver sed in these
matt er s, in the t radition of Swiss enginee r ing. Erec t ion procedures: a
t emporary cableway was const r ucted t o transport con cr et e for th e abut -
ments , t he cable and the pr efabr icat ed br idge deck segments from a
for est trail to t he const r ucti on site 50 m above. The lower abutment to
the sout h was concrete d fir st , afte r whi ch t he northern abutment was
complete d to ser ve as anchorages for the main suspension cables. The
mass of the abut me nt s, incr eased wit h soil ballast , works as a counte r-
weight to the cable forces . A sect ion of rock was used at the nor thern
abutment t o aid in anchor ing t he cables . The t hird abutment at the
sout hern end of the bri dge deck was on ly required to transfer ver tical
compression forces to t he soil below.
The two main suspensio n cables (Galfan-coate d spira l st rand,
d=36 mm diameter) ar e anchored in the abutments. A spelte r soc ket is
provided at each end of the cables, whi ch are st ressed with stee l plat es
Structure as Space, 2006 ,
p. ree f
Dechau, Wtlfr tcd,
Traversinersteg. Fot ografisches
Tagebuch, BerlinlTiibingcn, 2006
A not to berecreated, magical stage- the cablestructure before loading inJuly 2005 213
56.6 m
and shi ms to t he abutment using hydr auli c oil jacks. Two expe rie nced
cable exper ts carefully insta lled t he cable clamp s t hat join th e diagonal
cables (d=lo mm) t o th e suspension cables . Precision is requ ired here, as
any differ ence bet wee n calc ulat ed cable forc es and site execut ion would
change th e final geo me try. Trans verse girders in st eel, 3.6 m long, are
suspended from t he diagonal cables. Ten parall el lami nat ed larchwood
beams ( 14 0 x 220 mm) are laid longitudinally betwee n t he transverse
gir ders . These beams provide sufficient st iffness to prev ent unpleasant
dynamic osci llations . Th e main cables ar e also prest ressed t o create
addi t iona l compression forces in t he woo den deck. Bracing from diagonal
steel t ension rods in conjunct ion wit h t he wooden beams guarantee t he
lat eral sti ffeni ng effects of th e deck. Also not iceable in t he sectio n: t wo
sma ll bea ms are also bolt ed to t he two inner laminat ed beams to serve as
attachments for th e sta irs.
The positi on, height and design of the railings greatly affect t he
overa ll design of a foot bri dge of thi s scale. The handrail is at a height of
on ly I m, but the compressed longitudinal girders at both edges of t he
deck block an immediate view of t he depths below.
This is ] iirg Conzctr's t hird br idge in t he Viamala - after the Pu nt
da Sura nsu ns and t he Travers iner Footbri dge I. The structures could
hardl y be more different ; it is almost as if hi s command of so many st r uc-
t ura l systems is like th at of a gifte d linguist's command of seven langu a-
ges. Most bridge designers stay true t o one struct ura l form th roughout
t heir career. This is not t he case wit h ]ii rg Co nzett, who has no fear of
t he spectac ular. His readi ness to st udy th e complex ity of seemi ngly
simple challenge of a footbr idge has, in t he Viamala, led the design of a
scarcely reprod ucible work of struct ural ar t .
214 Footbridges
It is good to collect things, but It IS better to take walks. 1-1I,01Olt France
Nothing - no picture, no description - can replace personal obser-
vation. The abundance of footbridges we have been able to see in the last
several years can no longer be stuffed between two book covers to invite
you to visit. But we want to deprive the reader of as few of these beauti-
ful bridges as possible. The bridges described here briefly have been se-
lected subjectively - as has the rest of the book - and are arranged alpha-
betically according to country, and then sorted by city name. The index
of names and places on page 250 should ease the search for the structures
and travel arrangements.
216 Footbridges
III Footbridgein Feldkirch, Vorarlberg
A, 1989
Engineer : Bollinger + Grohmann, Fra nkfur t
Arc hitect : Mar tin Hauslc, Feldki rch
Gi rd er bridge fro m a spat ial tr uss with a
triangul ar sec t ion, lighting int egrated into th e
handr ail
Total lengt h: 44 m
Maximum spa n: 36 m
Width: 4m
Mat erial : st eel
Lit erature : Wettbewerbe , 90 /9 1, pp . 41-44
Schma l, Pet er C. (ed.) , workflow: St r ukt ur -
Archite kt ur, Basel, 2002, pp . 98-101
Kapfinger, Otto, Briicke iiber di e Ill, in : Bau-
kunst in Vor ar lberg seit 1980. Ein Fiihrer zu 260
sehenswer ten Baute n, Ost fild ern , 2003
Erich Edegger Footbridge in Graz
A, 1992
Pedestrian and cycle bri dge over t he Mur
River between Schloss be rg - and Mariahilfer-
pl at z
Engineer : Harald Egge r, Obelbach
Architect : Domenig & Wallner, Gr az
Simple girder with suspe nsio n syste m below
deck and cant ilever ing ends , integrated light ing
Free span: .H. 8 m
Wi dt h: 4 .4 m
Mat erial: steel, Railing: fully t empered glass
with sta inl ess steel handrails
Lit erature : Brichaut, Fiona , Graz, Er ich
Edegger Steg, in: Innovat ions in St eel. Bridges
around th e world, 1997, p. 13
We lls , Mat th ew and Hugh Pearman,
30 Brucken, Munich , 2002, pp. 104-107
Pear ce , Mar t in , Br idge Builders, London, 2002,
pp. 72-77
Mur Footbridge near Murau in Styria
A, 1995
Covere d timber bridge between ra ilway sta t ion
and th e city cent re over t he River Mur
Engineer : Co nzet t Bron zini Ga r t ma nn, Chur
Ar chitect : Marcel Meili , Markus Pet er
Ar chitekten , Zurich
Cove re d timber bridge with a cent ra l laminated
timber
Tot al length : 89.3 m
Free span: 47. 2m
Width: 3. 4 m
Mat erial : spr uce, lar ch
Lit era ture : Schlaich, Mike (ed.) , Murst eg
Mura u, Austri a (199,) , in : Guidel ines for th e
de Sign of footbridges, fib, Lausanne, Nove mber
200" p. 11,
Ar ch it ektur Akt uel l, 12, 199,
wcrk, bauen + wohn en, 12, 199,
Pearce, Martin, Bridge Bui lders, London, 2002
Moh sen, Most afavi (ed .), St r uct ure as Space,
London, 2006, p.70
217
Altfinstermunz Bridge in Nauders
A, 1472, destroyed 1875, rebuilt 1949
Bridge in th e upp er Inn valley, th e temporar y
reconstruction lies +m higher than th e or igina l,
a re con struction of th e or iginal bridge was car -
ri ed out in ' 9+9
Two bridges wit h a cent ra l fortifi cation tower ,
drawbridge to th e left , and cove re d suspension
bridge to th e ri ght
Tot al length: 37 m
Maximum span: Ostbruckc : 19 m
Maximum width : Ostb ru ckc: 3 m
Mat eri al : timber , Fortifi cation t ower : Masonr y
l.it er ature : Caramelle , Franz, Hi stori sche
Briickenbauten in Nord- und Osttirol , in :
lndusrr icar chaoloyi c Nord -, Ost -, Siidtirol und
Vorarlber g, Innsbru ck, ' 992 , P: 82
Bridge over River Rosanna, Strengen
A,1765
Brid ge in th e St anz er Valley, or iginally used to
con nec t farms on th e r ight bank of th e River
Rosanna, r enovat ed in ' 975
Covered wo od en bridge with doubl e trapezoi -
dal kin g post truss, con structed without iron
connec ti on element s with timber shingling at
th e west ern side
Tot al length: , 8 m
Maximum span: ' 3. 5 m
Width: I .sm
Mat erial: timber
Lit erat ur e : Cara me lle , Fr anz , Hi storische
Brii ckenbaut en in Nord- und Osttirol, in :
Industricarchaologi e Nord-, Ost -, Siidtirol und
Vorarlberg, Inn sbruck , '992, p. 89
Mucha , Aloi s, Hol zbruckcn , Wi esbaden , 1995
Ziesel, Wolfdi et ri ch , Dream Bridges/Traum-
brucken, Vienna, 200 +, pp . '3 2-'+'
Fr6disch Bridge in Sulz, Vorarlberg
A,1999
Brid ge connec t ing th e communit ies of Sulz and
Zwi schen wasser (Muntlix) for ped estrians and
cycl ists
Engineer: M + G Ingen ieure , Feldki rch
Arch itect : Marte.Marte Architekten , Weiler
Steel trough bridge from ste el plate, exte nsion
of an ex ist ing mason ry bridge
Tot al length: +6 m
Fr ee span: +' m
Width : Pedestrian lane 2.3 m, Road way 3.2 m
Mat erial : wea t hering st eel (Z shape from 30
mm thi ck plat e), Railing: weathering st eel (ver-
ti cal plat e of Z shape d profil e ser ves as
balu strade)
Zollamt Bridge in Vienna
A, 1900
Footbridge over a r ailway bridge and th e Wien-
flu ss
Enginee r : Martin Paul, A. Biro
Ar chitect : Jos ef Hackhofer, Fri edrich
Ohman n
Ar ch bridge
Free span: 31.3 m
Width: 7.6 m
Mat eri al: steel
Lit erature: Pauser , Alfr ed, Bru ckcn in Wi cn .
Ein Fuhre r durch di e Baugeschi chte, Vienna/
New York, 2005
218 " l r t res
Hackinger Footbridge in Vienna
A, 1994
Footbr idge over multi -lane arteri al road and
the Wi enfluss canal near the Hiitteldorf tram
stat ion. Th e st r uct ure br idges the Wi enfluss
canal and connec ts t he rjth and 14th di strict s in
Vienna.
Engineer : Wolfdi etrich Zi esel , Vienna
Archite ct : Henk e-Schreieck Architekten,
Vienna
Lightweight st eel structure, mostl y t ension-
load ed member s
Total length: 64 m
Maximum span: 26 m
Width: 4.5 m
Mat erial: steel, glass
Literature: Zi esel , Wolfdietrich, Dr eam
Bridges/Traumbriicken , Vienna, 2004,
pp.142- 155
Erdberger Footbridge in Vienna
A, 2003
Bridge over the Danube Canal near th e Erdber-
ger Linde
Engineer : Alfred Pauser , Vien na
Archi t ect : Zeininger Ar chitekten , Vienna
Frame st r uct ure fro m indi vidu al compre ssion
and t en sion clement s
Total length: 85 m
Maximum span: 53 m
Width: 3.7 m
Mat erial: t imber
Literature: St einmetz , Mark , Architektur
neues Wi en , Berl in , 2000
Bridge over the Ourthe in Hatton
8,2003
Bridge between Hotton Island and th e cit y
cent re
Engineer: Ney & Partner s, Brussels
Archi t ect : Zi ane, Liege
Shallow ar ch bridge
Total length: 30 m
Free span: 26 m
Width: brid ge deck: 2m
Mat erial: Ar ch: ste el , Deck girder : ste el grid
Lit erature: Conco urs Const r uct ion Acier 2004 ,
in: Staal -Acier , 5, 2004, p. 200
Bridge in Woluwe Saint-Pierre
8,2002
Footbridge over th e Avenu e de Ter vure n
Engineer: Ney & Partner s, Brussels
Architect: Pierre Blondel , Brussels
Deck ar ch hri dge with the deck int egr ated to
the side of the arch, walk abl e arch, asymmet r ic
cross sect ion
Free span: 70 m
Width: 2x 3 m
Mat erial : ste el, Sur faci ng: timber
Literature: Moritz, Benoit, Passer ell e Avenue
de Tcr vuren. Woluwe Saint Pierre, in: A+, I,
2002, pp . 74-75
Concours Co nstr uct ion Aci er 2002, in: Staal -
Acier, 2002, p. 198
219
Footbridge in Basel -Bi rsigtal
CH, 1865
Foothridge in th e Birsig vallev under th e Doren
bach Viaduct , one of th e oldest remaining st eel
foothridges in Switzerland
Lattice st r uct ur e
Mat eri al: iron
Lit erat ur e : Fed eral Roads Office (pub. ) ,
Hist or ische Vcr keh rswege, Bern, 2004 , p. 6
Chapel Bridge in Lucerne
CH, c. 1365
Bridge in th e cit y cent re of Lucern e ,
or iginally part of t he ci t y fortificati on
Co vered frame gir der, major fire i n 1993, rehu-
ilt acco rding t o origina l design
Tot al length : originally 285 m, shor te ned sever -
al times in th e 19th cent ur y t o 202m
Maxi mu m span : 9.3 m
Width: 3.2 m
Mat er ial : Piers: sands to ne, Frame and longitu -
dinal girders : oak, Roof: silver fir and spruce
Lit er at ure : Pantli, Hein z, Kapellbr iicke und
Wasserturm, in : Den kmalpfl ege im Kanton
Luzern 1994, [ ah rbuch der Hist ori schen
Gesellschaft Luzern, 1995, pp . 70-74
Flur y-Rova, Mori t z et al. , Kapellbr uckc
und Wassert urm. Dcr Wi ederaufbau einc s
Wahrzeichens im Spiegel der Restauri er ung
und For schung, Lucerne, 1998
Graf, Bernhard, Of Swi ss Heroi c Deed s. The
KapellBridge in Lucern e, in: Bridges t hat
Cha nged th e World, Miin chen, 2002, pp . 34-35
220 Footbridges
..
Bhutan Bridge near Ovronnaz
CH,2005
Bridge over t he Illgraben between upp er and
lower Valai s, ent rance to pfynwald nat ure
reser ve
Suspe nded dec k st r uct ure modell ed aft er
Bhutanese br idges
Fr ee span: lJ4 m
Wi dt h: 1 m
Mat er ial : st eel, Deck: t imber ,
Abut ment : concrete
Fibre-reinforced Plast ic Footbridge
in Pontresi na
CH, 1997
Footbridge over th e River Flaz
Enginee r : Otto Kiinzle, Zurich
Truss bridge, with bolt ed connec t ions at one
span and glued connec t ions at t he adjacent span
Total length: 2) m
Moveable sec t ion: 2 x 12. ) m
Width: 1. 9 m
Material: fibr e-reinforced plast ic
Lit erature: Kell er, Thomas and Otto Kiinzle ,
Ur s Wyss, Ful3gange r br iicke Pontresina in
GFK, in: SI+A Schwei zer Ingen ieur und Ar chi -
tekt , 12, 1998
Kell er, Thomas, Toward s Struct ural Forms for
Co mposite Fibr e Mat er ials, in : Struct ura l
Engi neer ing Int er nat ional , vol. 9 , November
1999, pp. 297-30 0
Ganggel ibrugg in 51. Gallen
CH, 1882
Footbr idge in Rcchen , earl ier footbridges con-
tinually destroyed by flooding, renovat ed in
192) and 1936
Suspe nsion bri dge
Fr ee spa n: 6). 7 m
Widt h: 1. 2 m
Mat eri al : iron
Lit erat ure: Stad elma nn, Wern er, St . Galler
Brii cken, S1. Gallen , 1987, pp. 4 6-47
Ruinaulta Bridge in Trin
CH, planned 2007
Footbridge over the Rhi ne gorge connec t ing
t he Tri n railway st at ion with the Ruinaulta
Nat ura l Monument
Engineer : Walt er Bieler, Bonadu z
Suspe nsion bridge, deck as a hori zont al vieren-
deel girder
Tota l lengt h: 98 m
Maximum span: 74 m
Width: qm
Mat er ial: Pylon and Cab les: stee l, Br idge deck
and handrail: lar ch
1.
221
Pa sserelle SOl, Val Soj in Tieino
eH, 2006
Wood en bri dge oyer th e Soja River in Bleni otal,
repl aces a metall ic struct ure th at was dest royed
duri ng floo d ing in August 2003
Engineer : Laub e, Biasca
Archite ct : Martin Hugli , lr agn a
Co mpress ion ar ch to minimi ze forces and
cos ts , [ivc arches lying on e oyer anot he r
free span: 22 m
Wi dth : I.2 111
Mat eri al : laminat ed timber, Sur facing: lamina-
t ed ti mb er plat e sur faced with bitumen ,
Abut ment : conc rete
Literat ure : Lignum (pub.) , 18Ingeni eurholz -
bautcn, Zuri ch, Febr uary 2007, pp . 20-21
I{ugli , Mar tin , Einfacher geht Briickc nbau
woh l nicht mehr, in: baucn mi t hol z, s, 2007 ,
pp . 18-21
Sch\\Tizer Hol zbau 7, 2007
Milk Bridge in Vals Platz
CH, planned 2008
Moveable bridge over th e Valser Rhine in t he
ce ntre of Vals Plat z
Engineer : COI1Zett Bron zini Gartmann, Chur
Simple girder with a box sect ion, bridge can be
lift ed during flooding, st r uc t ure works as a
fr ame
Total lengt h : 23 111
Fr ee span: 21111
Width: 1. 1 m
Mat eri al : steel
Expo-Bridge in Yverdon-Ies-Bains
CH,2002
Two par allel bridge t o t he Swiss r egiona l cx hib-
ti on Expo 2002
Engineer: St aubli , Kurath & Partner, Zurich
and Swl ssfiber, Zur ich
Ar ch it ect: Diller Scofidio + Renfro, New York
Co nt inuous girder, all memb ers translucent
Total length: 2 x 120m
Free span: 12 m
Width : 2, S m
Mat eri al: fibregl ass, Pier s: st ee l: Railing: t rans-
lucent , lit from bel ow
Lit erature : Oer Wolkenst eg, in : Fiberglas, sup-
plement to Hochparterre 4 , 2004 , Zurich , p. 21
Ent wic klunge n im Ber eich Faserkuns ts to ffe im
Bauwesen an der Zurcher Hochschule in
Winterthur, in : Der Bauingenieu r, 12 , 2ooS
Bridge over the Vltava in Prague-Troja
CZ,1986
Th e stress ribbon bridge connect s th e Pragu e
Zoo and th e Stromovka Park
Engineer: ]i ri St ras kv, Pragu e
Tot al length: 249 m
Maximum span: 96 m
Width: 3. 8 m
Mat erial : concrete
Lit er ature : St ras ky, [iri , Stress ribbon and
cable -suppor ted ped estrian bridges, London,
2ooS, p 76
222 Footbridges
Bridgein Bad Homburg von der H6he
D, 2002
Urban footbridge above the Hessenring high-
\\'ay
Engineer: Schlaic h Ber germ ann und Partner,
St uttgart
Cable-st ayed bri dge wi th st one mast, deck plat e
suspended by 16 t ension rods
Total length: 76 m
Free span : 46 m
width: 6.9 m
Mat erial : Mast : Nero Assoluto, an igneous rock
Gabbro
Liter atu re: Russell , Lisa, Footbridge Awa rd s
2005", in : Brid ge Design and Engineer ing, vol.
11 , 4' , 2005"
Bridge over the AShighwaynear
Baden-Baden
D, 1996
Pedestrian and cycle bridge
Engineer : Ingenieur gruppe Bauen, Karl sruhe
Simple girder, fabricated next to the auto bahn,
lift ed int o place du ring a jc-mi nute br eak in
traffi c
Free span: 40 m
Mat erial : st eel
Foot bridge in Bensheim
D,2006
Pedestrian and cycle br idge over th e Highways 3
and 47 connet ing the sout hern cit y cent re wi t h
t he western sect ion of the city
Engineer : Schlaich Ber ger mann und Par t ner,
St uttgart
Archi t ect: Heinz Frassine, Bensheim
Arch bridge with column-suppo r te d ramp
Free span: 30.3 m
Width: 2.5" m
Mat erial : Arch: ste el, Deck girder: reinforced
concre te
Gericke Footbridge in Berlin-Mitt e
D, 1915, 1949
Footbrid ge at the tram stat ion Bell evue over the
Spree River , or iginally called BellevueFootbridge
Engineer : Br uno Moh r ing
Longitudinal system: Frame wit h two ar tic ula-
ti ons serving as an arch syst em with suspend ed
deck; Tr ansverse syste m: Girder gr id wi t h re-
inforce d concret e plat e
Tot al lengt h: 5"6. 8 m
Free span: 5" 2m
Width : 5" m
Mat erial: Superstruct ure: ste el,
Surfaci ng: mast ic asphalt, Abutment : concrete
with li mestone
Lit er ature : Senator fur Bau- und Wohnungs-
wesen (pub.), Gerickest eg uber di e Spr ee, in :
Fu13gangerbr ucken in Berlin, Berlin, ' 976,
pp . 24- 25"
223
Abtei Bridge in Berlin-Treptow
D, 1916
Foothridge over th e sout he rn tributary of th e
Spree connec t ing Tr eptow Park with
Abt ci Island
Eng ineer : St adt ischc Vcrkehrsbauamt
:\eukolln
Deck arc h hridge, arc h huilt between t wo
tower st r uct ures
Tot allcngth: ' 0 0 rn
Fr ee span: m
\Vidth : l .R m
Mat eri aI: rei nforced concrete ,
Reinforcem ent : wr apped cas t orin tubes
Gotenburg Footbridge, Berlin-Wedding
D,1957
Bridge over the Panke forming an extension of
t he Gotenburger road, connecti ng th e par k
areas at eac h ri verbank
Simple compos ite gir de r, sinuso ida l guardrail
filling
Tot al length: ,6.' m
Free spa n:
Wid th : 2,R m
Mat erial : st ee l, rei nforced co nc re te, Sur facing:
masti c aspha lt, Railing: steel
Lite rat ure: Senato r fur Bau- und Wohnun gs-
wcsen (pub. ), Elsens teg in Ne uko lln, in : Fu li-
gangerbr iicken in Berlin , Berlin, 197 6 , pp . H -H
Nordpol Bridge in Bochum-Hamme
D, 1999
Footbrid ge at t he entrance t o th e Westpark in
Bochum
Enginee r : Boll inger + Grohmann, Frankfurt
Ar chitect : HeggeI' HeggeI' Schl ei ff Plane r + Ar -
chite kte n, Kassel
Lying truss gir de r, dia gon al tuhes as bra cing,
inte ract ive lighting system
Free span: 100 m
Width: 2. 2 m to 3.8 m
Material: Superstructure and Pier s: steel, Sur -
face : grating, Railing: cant ileveri ng full y t em -
per ed glass
Lite rat ure : Schmal, Pet er C. (cd .) , wo r kflow:
Struktur - Ar chitcktur, Basel , 2002, pp .
Murkenbach Bridge in B6blingen
D, 1995
Foo tbridge in th e city park
Engi nee r : Decker Ingeni eur-Gesellschaft , Bob-
lingen
Ar chitect: Jan son + Wol frum/ Ar chitektur +
St adtpl anung, Muni ch
Simple gi rde r wi th pl atform
Total len gth: 14. 8 m
Free span : ' 3.5 m
Width : 2. 8 m
Materi al : laminated timber fr om larch planks
on ste el cross beams
Lit erature : Janson, Alban and Sophie Wolf-
rum, Garten und Landschaft , 7,1996 , P: 4' 1'.
224 Footbridges
Bridge in Brandenburg an der Havel
D,2 001
Foot bridge over t he Jacobsgraben canal
Enginee r : lngenieurgemeinschaft Hartel &
Schier meyer, Bad Oeynhausen
Land scap e ar chitect: Uwe Tiet ze & Partner ,
Berlin
Simple gir der
Tot al lengt h: 24 .2 m
Free span: 22.5 m
Width: 2.9 m
Mat eri al : St r uct ural member s and railing: hot
dip galvanized steel, Surfacin g: Bongossi tim-
ber
Port Bridge Vegesack in Bremen
D, 2000
Pedest r ian bascul e brid ge bet ween AIt-
Vegesack and th e newly buil t Ar eal Haven Haft
Engineer : Aru p, Du sseld or f
Designer : Designlabor Bremerhaven , Bremer -
haven
Closed bridge works as a cont inuous girde r.
Bascul e moti on uses th e elbow lever t echnique,
integrated lighting
Total lengt h: 42 m
Width: 3.5 m to 7 m
Material: steel, conc rete , Deck sur face: perfo-
rate d st ainless st eel plat e
Zoo Bridge in Dessau
D, 2001
Bridge oyer t he Ri ver Mulde , connec t ing th e
city cent re wi t h th e zoo
Engi neer: Ste fan Polonyi & Par t ner, Co logne
Ar chitect : Kist er Scheit hauer Gross, Co logne
Tubul ar arch with suspended cur ved deck
gi rder
Tot al length: 133m
Fr ee spa n: 111. 3 m
Width: 2.8 m
Mat erial : st eel
Lit er ature: Bund esingen ieurk ammer (pub.) ,
lngen ieurbaukunst in Deutschl and . Jahrbuch
200312004 , Hamburg, 2003 , pp . 102-104
Footbridge in Duisburg
D,1958
Cable-st ayed br idge for the world expost ion
1958 in Bru ssels, t ransported aft er the ex posit i-
on t o the Du isbu rg Zoo, cur rently connec t ing
the Univer sit y campus with the Muhlheimcr
For est
Ar chitect : Egon Eicr rnann, Sep Ruf
Unil at erally suppor ted deck with a single asym-
metric mast.
Total length: 65 m
Maximum span: 43.5 m
Width: 4 m to 4 . 4 m
Mat eri al : Deck and abut me nt : reinfor ced conc-
ret e, Mast , cables and railing: ste el
Lit erature: Walt her, Rene, Schragse ilbr ucken,
Lausanne/Dussel dorf, 1994, pp. 154, 157
225
Essinger Bridge, Essing, Alt rnuhl Valley
D,1986
Footbr idge over th e Main -Danube Canal
Engineer : Ingeni eurburo Bruninghoff und
Rampf, Ulm
Architect : Buro fur [ngeni eur-Architektur
Richard J. Dietri ch , Traunste in
Timber st ress ribb on brid ge
Tot al length : 190 m
Maxim um span: 73 m
Width : \ . 1m
Mat eri al : timber , Railin g: larch timber with
Niro-ste el guardra il fill ing
Lit er ature: Briininghoff', Hein z, The Essing
Timber Bridge, Germany, in : St r uct ura l
Enginee ring Int ern at ional, vol. 3, Mai 1993
Di etrich , Richard J. , Faszi nat ion Br iickcn , Mu -
nich , ' 998, pp . 206-2 1J
Well s, Matthew and Hugh Pearman,
\0 Briicken, Muni ch , 2002, pp . 140-143
Iron Bridge in Frankfurt
D, 1869, 1946
Footbridge over th e River Main
Truss brid ge
Total lengt h: 173. 6 m
Ma xim um span: 82.5 m
Wid th : 5.4m
Material : steel
Literature: Gorr, Wol fram , Fra nkfur ter Bru -
ckcn. Schl eus cn , Fahr cn , Tunnels und Brucken
des Main , Frankfurt, 1982, pp. " 5-138
Mack ler, Chr isto ph, Fra nkfurte r Bruckcn , in :
Jahrbuch fur Ar chit ektur 1984 . Das neue
Fra nkfur t II, Berlin , 1984, pp.61-98
Moll , Rein er , Alt stahlschweiBen und Nicte n im
Zuge der Grunderneuerung des "Eisern en Ste -
ges" in Frankf ur t am Main , in: Der Stahlbau ,
vol. 66, Janu ar y ' 997, pp . I -II
Holbein Footbridge in Frankfurt
D,1990
Footbr idge between cit y cent re and the Sach-
se nhauser Mus eum bank
Enginee r: Koni g und Heunisch Planungs-
gesell schaft , Frankfurt
Arch it ect: Albert Speer & Partner , Frankfurt
Suspensi on bridge , staged lighting
Tota l lengt h: 214 m
Maximum span: 142m
Width: 2.4 m
Mat erial : steel
Lite rature : Ch r istian Bartenbach, Umlenk- und
Spiegelwerftechnik: Hohlbeinsteg, in : Werk,
Baucn + Wohnen, Oktober 1994
Setzepfandt, Wo lf-Christ ian , Arc hit ektur-
fuhr er Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, 2002, p. 85
Serieof bridges in Hamburg
D, Project
Footbridges between Will y-Brandt-StraBe and
th e Zoll Canal
Engineer : Werner Sobek Ingenieur e,
Stuttgart
Ar chitect : Jan Stormer Partner , Hamburg
Cont inuous box girder, 30 round columns ar e
cont inued above t he de ck pr oviding bridge
lighting.
Total length: 200 m
Maximum span: 40 m
Width: 2.3 m to 4 .2 m
Material : st eel
226 Footbridges
Skywal k in Hanover
0, 1998
Pedestrian walkway between Laat zen railway
st atio n and the Exp o 2000 grounds
Engi nee r : RFR Ingeni eure, St uttgart
Architec t: Schulitz + Partner Ar chitekten ,
Braun schweig
Doubl e tube with one storey-high struct ure
Total length: 338. 4- m
Maximum span: 28m
Width: 8.8 m
Mat eri al: ste el , Facade: bent glass
Liter ature: Karl J. Habermann and Helmut C.
Schulitz, Werner Sobek, Stahlbau Atl as, Mu-
nich, 1999, pp. 22S, 336 -339
Meyer , Lilr, Freakshow. Die Archi te kt ur der
Expo, in : db deutsche bauzeitung, 6, 2000,
pp. 60- 69
Pear ce, Martin, Bridge Builder s, Lond on , 2002,
pp.lso-IB
Expo Bridges in Hanover
0,2000
Four bridges on the Han over Expo grounds
Engi neer : Schlaich Bergermann und Partner ,
Stuttgart
Ar chitect : Gerkan Marg & Partner ,
Hamburg
Cabl e-stayed bridges, all bridges on a grid
Of7s
m x7
s
m
Greatest total length: East ern bridge 13S m
Gr eat est span: Southern bridge 4-S m
Greatest width: Cent ra l bridge 4-S m
Material : steel, cast ste el, Deck plat e: perma-
nent plat e in rei nforce d concre te , temporary
plat e from surfaced lar ch t imb er planks
Literat ure : Tor res Arcila, Martha, Bridges -
Ponts - Brucken, Mexi co City, 2002,
pp.4-72-4-81
Cr uvelier, Mark, Footbr idges of th e world's
fair s, in: Footbridge 2002, Par is, pp. 104--105
Nesse Bridgein Leer
0,2006
Brid ge over th e trade port connecti ng the his-
t ori c city cent re and pedest ri an zone wi th th e
newl y const r ucte d Nesse grounds
Engineer : Schlaich Bergermann und Partner ,
St ut tga r t
Cable-st ayed bridge with bascul e centre, deck
bent in plan
Total length: 82m
Length of the bascul e section: 2x7 m
Width: 3m to r m
Mat erial : Bascul e sect ion: steel, Deck girde r :
composit e, Abutment : reinfor ced concrete
B6rstel Bridge in Lehne
0,2000
Pedestrian and cycle bri dge over the Ri ver
Werre
Engin eer : Schlaich Ber germ ann und Partner,
Stuttgart
Ar chitect : Claus Bur y, Frankfurt
Stress ribbon bridge with concre te ar ch
Total length: 96 m
Maximum span: 35 m
Width: 3.Sm
Mat erial : Ar ch: reinfor ced concrete, Deck:
pr est ressed concre te
227
Footbridge in Minden
0, 1994
Pedest r ian and cycle br idge oyer the Ri ver We-
Sl' r
Eng ineer : Schlaich Berger mann un d Partner,
St uttgart
Suspension bridge wit h reinforced co nc re te
deck pl at e, inclined mast s
Span: around 105 m
Width: j . 6 m
Mat er ial : ste el
Lit erat ur e : Pearce, Martin, Bridge Builders,
Lon don, 2002 , pp . 174--177
Torres Arcila, Martha, Bridges - Pon t s >-
Br iicken, Mex ico Cit y, 20 0 2, pp. 4-38-4-4-1
Footbr idge in Mun ich
0,1985
Footbridge oyer t he Mi t tl erer Ring
Engineer : Ingen ieurbii ro Suess und Sta ller,
Gr afelfi ng
Ar chit ect : Biir o fiir Ingenieur -Architekt ur
Ri chard J. Diet r ich, Trauns t ein
Spati al cable suspension , suspension st r uct ure
from t r iang ular cr oss sec t ion
Fr ee span: 69 m
Width: j.5m
Mat eri al: Super st r uct ure, cables: st eel
Literatur: Det ail , 5, 1987
Diet ri ch, Ri chard J. , Fasz inat ion Br iicken , Mu -
ni ch , 19 9 8, pp. 214--219
St ahl-Informat ions-Zent r um (pub.) , Hange-
sei lbr iicke in Mii nchen , Deu t schl an d ( 1985) , in :
Dokument at ion P7. Fufl gangerbriicken aus
Sta hl, Dusseld or f, 20 04-, p. 24-
Bridge to the Wiesn grounds, Munich
0,2005
Pedestrian and cycle bridge oyer t he Bayer stras-
sc
Engine er : Chr ist oph Ackermann Ber at endes
Ingenieurbii ro fiir Bauwc sen , Munich
Architect : Ackerma nn und Partner Ar chitek-
ten , Munich
Hybr id polygonal arch bridge
Fr ee span : 38 m
Width: 4-m
Mat eri al : steel , hi gh- stren gth st ee l
Lit erature: Brii ckenbauen mit ncu cn Werkst of-
fen: Die Fuflgangerb r iicke iiber die Bayerstrafle
in Mii nchen , in : St ahlbau, Octo ber 2005,
pp. 729 - 734-
Packer, Jeffr ey A. and Sil ke Wil lib ald (eds) ,
Tubular St r uc t ures XI, London, 2006
Footbr idge in Oschat z
0,2006
Bridge oyer t he Ri ver Dollnitz, st at e bot ani ca l
exposit ion 20 0 6
Engine er : Silvio Weiland and Di rk Jesse, Tech -
ni cal Uni versit y Dresden
I
Bridge consist ing of ten U-spa ced prefabri cat ed
conc rete seg ment s, each r eceiying six pres-
t ress ed st eel tendon s
Tot al len gth : 9 . 1m
Fr ee span: 8. 6 m
Width: 2.5 m
Depth: deck plate and sides: 3 em
Mat erial: conc re t e wit h t extil e fibre r einfor ce-
ment
Lit erat ure: Cur bach, Manfred and Silvi o Wei -
land, Fer t igt eilbriicke fii r die Landesgarten-
schau 200 6 in Oschatz aus t extilbeweh rtem Be-
ton , in : BFT, vol. 70 , 2, 20 04-, pp . 102-103
228 Footbridges
Ladenberg Bridgein Potsdam
0,2001
Bridge over a port ion of a newl y dug city canal
in t he cent re of Potsdam
Engineer: Fichtner + Koppl, Rosenhei m
Ar chi tect : Biiro fiir Ingenieur -Architekt ur
Richard j . Die t ri ch, Trau nst ein
Simple girder, seri es of st eel girders wi t h lenti -
cular suspension system
Free span: 13m
Width: 3 m
Mat eri al : steel, Surfacing: t imb er
Lit erature: Diet r ich, Ri chard j ., Faszination
Briicken, Muni ch, 1998, Pl" 266- 267
Di etrich, Richard j. , Eine neue Briicke in Pot s-
dam, in: Umr isse - Zeit schr ift fiir Baukult ur,
2,2001 , p. 42
Dragon'sTail Bridgein Ronneburg
0,2006
Pede strian and cycle bridge over the Gessent al
River near Ronnebu rg/ Gera for t he federal bo-
ta nica l expositi on 2007
Engi neer : Ficht ner + Koppl , Rosenheim
Ar chi tect : Biiro fiir Ingeni eur -Arch itektur
Richard j . Diet rich, Tra unstein
Timber st ress ri bbon br idge wi t h three spans
Total length: 2E m
Maximum span: 65 m
Width: 2.5 m to 3.8 m
Mat er ial: Stress ri bho n: lami nat ed ti mb er
blocks, Pier s: st eel tubes, Substruct ure :
concrete
Literat ure: Keirn , Mario, Briicken bau mit Sinn
fiir gesta lteri sche Qualitat , in: VDI -Na chrich-
ten , 10November 2006
Werner, Hartmut , Langst es Span nband
Europas, in: bauen mit hol z, II , 2006, Pl" 6-[(
Mahlbusen Bridgein Rostock
0,2002
Pair of ste el bridges for the Int ern at ional Bota -
nical Exposit ion 2003
Enginee r: Schlaich Berger mann und Part ner,
St utt gart
Lands cape architect : W ES & Partner Land-
schaft sar chit ekt en, Hamburg
Conti nuous beam girder bridge wit h two main
gir ders , st eel girde r bridge
Tot al length: 35.5 m and 48 m
Maximum span: 25.5 m and 2x 24 m
Widt h: 4. 4 m
Mat eria l: ste el, concre te
Literat ure: Decha u, Wilfri ed, Die IGA in Ro-
st ock, in: db de uts che bauzeit ung, 8, 2003, p. 24
Schlaich, Mike, Die FuBgangerbriicken auf der
Int ern at ionalen Gar tenausst ell ung IGA 2003 in
Rostock, in: Bauingenieur, 10, 20 3, p. 441
StieberValleyBridge in Rot h
0, 2002
The bridge crea tes t he shor tes t pos sible con-
nectio n bet ween the rai lway st at ion and th e city
cent r e
Engineer : Gra d Ingen ieur planungen ,
Ingol st adt
Ar chitect: Vogel + Par t ner, Mun ich
Int egral st eel box gi rder fixed to abut ments , de-
flect s lat er ally und er t emperature loads.
Tota l length: 170 m
Maximu m span: 36 m
Width: j m
Mat erial: mechanically gah-anized and coated
ste el
Liter at ure: Habermann, Kar l j ., Schragseil -
br iicke in Roth, in: db deut sche bauzeitung,
5,
20
3, Pl" 54-
61
Grad, j ohann, Stieber ta lbrii cke in Roth /
Bayern, in: Stahlbau, 12, 20 3, Pl" 868-871
229
Bridge in Schnaittach
D, 2002
Entrance br idge to Roten burg Ca stl e
Engineer : Ingenieu r - Bii ro Ludwig Viczens,
Eckenta l
C;irder br idge wit h t ran sverse frame for rai -
li ngs, hist or ic st r uc t ures are r efl ect ed in mo -
der n ti mb er const r uc t ion
Tot al lengt h: 24.4 m
W idth : l .6 m
Mater ial: Super structure and substr uct ure :
lami nated larch timber , st ee l, Foundat ion: r e -
ill1()ITed conc re te
Literat ur e : Viczcns, Ludwig, Briickenschl ag
zur Festung, in: baucn mi t hol z, [2, 200 2,
pp. 17-20
Queen Mary' s Bridge near Schwangau
D, 1866, rest ored 1978
Br idge over the Poll at' s Ca nyon wit h a view of
Neuschwanst ei n
Engineer : Hei nri ch Ger ber (1832- 1912)
Ri vet s steel truss, t he ori gina l t imber foot -
br idge was replaced in 1866 by a freely span ning
iro n st r uct ur e, rai lings arc or igina l
Fr ee span : 34.9 m
Mat eri al : iro n, Surfaci ng : ti mber
Tower Bridge in Singen amHohentwiel
D, 2000
Foo t br idge for t he Sta te Botan ical Exposition ,
connects t wo portions of t he city par k
Engineer : Baust atik ReIl ing, Singen
Landscape ar ch ite ct : Micha el Pal m,
Weinhei rn
Covered ti mb er truss bridge with stairway t o-
wer as continuo us gir der on three supports
with a cantilever, prefabricat ed in the wo rks hop
in two segment s
Total lcngt h: 43.5 m
Fr ee spa n: 28.2 m
Width: 2.2 m
Mat eri al : t imber
Literat ure : Fu Hgiingerbr iicke in Singen, in :
Detail, 3, 2001, pp . 446-449
Gede ckt e Fachwerkbriicke mit Turm , in:
bauen mit hol z, Novembe r 2000, pp. 12 -14
Pragsattell and II in Stuttgart-Nord
D, 1992
Br idges for t he Internati on al Bot anical Exposi-
ti on 1993 over t he Heilbr onner St ra lle
Engi neer : Schlaich Berg erman n und Par tner,
St uttgart
Architect : Planu ngsgruppe Luz, Lohrer, Egen -
hofcr , Schlaic h, St uttgart
Bri dge I :
Concrete footbridge suppor te d by steel tube
arch , bra nching st eel pi ers
Free span: 52m
Width : 4 .5m
Mat erial : steel , co ncr et e
Br idge 11 :
Branching co lumn br idge
Tota l length: 83.9 m
Wi dth: 4m
Mat er ial : steel , co ncrete
230 Footbridges
Footbridge in Stuttgart-Vaihingen
D, 1992
Footbridge over th e Allmandring on t he
Un iversit y of St uttgart campus
Engineer: Ingenieurburo Lachenman n,
Vaihi ngen an der Enz
Ar chit ect : Kaag + Schwa r z, St uttgart
Cable-t ensioned polygonal ar ch bridge, eleven
br idge segme nts with articul at ed conne ct ions
Fr ee span: 34 m
Width: 3.2m
Mat eri al : steel
Literat ur e: Kaag, Werner an d Rudolf Schwarz,
Fuf3gangersteg in Stuttgart , in: archplus ,
11 8, 1993, p. 33
Kaag, Werner and Gust! Lachenmann, Fuf3gan-
gerst eg in St ut t gar t -Vaihingen, in : arc hplus,
124h 25, 1994, p. 70
Lachenmann, Gust l, Fuf3gangers teg iiber den
Allmandring in St uttgar t / Vaihingen, in: Stahl -
bau, II, 1994 , pp . 337-342
Kaag, Werner and Rudolf Schwarz, Fuf3ganger-
steg in St uttgar t, in: Deta il , 8, 1999,
pp . 1459-1461
Schlaich, Jor g and Mat thias Schu ller, Ingen i-
eur baul- uhrer Baden -Wii rttemberq, Berlin,
1999, pp . 196-197
We lls, Matthew and Hugh Pear man ,
30 Brii cken, Miinchen , 2002, pp. 108-1II
Heilbronner Strar5e Bridge in Stuttgart
D,1992
Bri dge for th e Int ernat ion al Botanical Exposi -
t ion 1993 near Nordbahn hof
Engi neer : Schlaich Bergermann und Partn er,
St uttgart
Ar chi t ect : Planungsgr uppe Luz, Lohr er,
Egen hofer, Schlaich , St uttgart
Back- and sel f-anchored sus pensio n bridge
Tota l lengt h : 125 mh30 m
Width: 5 m
Mat eri al : st eel, concrete
Lit erat ure : Schlaich, Jorg and Matthias Schul-
ler, Ingen ieurbauFuhrer Baden -Wiirtternberg,
Berli n, 1999, pp. 190-191
Footbridge in Stuttgart-Pragstrar5e
D, 1992
Cablen et Footb r idge for t he Int ern at ion al
Bot ani cal Expos it ion 1993
Engineer : Schlai ch Bergermann und Partner,
Stuttgart
Ar chitect : Planungsgruppe Luz, Lehrer ,
Egenhofer, Schlaich, St ut tga r t
Cablenet footbridge , an inversely arranged
cablenet support s th e footbridge
Fr ee span: ca. 75 m
Width: 3. 1m
Mat erial : Cablenet : steel
Lit erature : Schlaich, Jorg and Matthias Schul-
ler, Ingen ieurb auFii hrer Baden-Wii rtt ember g,
Berlin, 1999, pp . 188-189
231
La-Ferre Footbridge in Stuttgart-
Zuffenhausen
D,2001
Ped es t ri an and cycle bridge over the Halde n-
rain st raBe
Engi neer : Pet er und Lochner , St uttgar t
Ar chitect: 'asp' Ar chitekt en St uttgar t
Fra me bridge, t he deck axis is a ci rc ular ar c in
plan with a radius of 53.7 m, integral bridge
wit hout bearings or joint s
Tot al len gth: IIR.5 m
Maximu m span : 2R.5m
Width: J.5 m
Mat erial: r einforced co nc re te, Pi ers: cas t st eel,
st e-el. Rail ing: st ainless ste el
Lit erature : Pete r, Jiirg and Matthias Schuller ,
FuB- und Radwegbriicken iibcr di e Haldenrain-
st r al3e in St uttgar t , in : Bet on- und Stahl -bet on -
bau , Novembe r 2002, pp . 609 - 614
Footbridge in Waiblingen
D,1 978
Bridge over t he Ri ver Rcms between Groller
Er lcninsel and Br uhlwiescn
Enginee r : Ingeni eu rbii r o Leonhardt und
And ra , Stut tgar t
Ar ch bridge
Tot al len gth : 39 m
Fr ee span: 28 m
Width : 3.7 m
Materi al : Superst ructure : reinforced conc re t e,
Surfacin g: urethane sur facing, Railings : st eel
Lit er ature : Leonhardt , Fritz, Brii cken /Bridges,
St uttga rt , 1994, p. 97
Schl ai ch, Jorg and Matthi as Schulle r, Ingeni -
eurba ul- uhrer Baden -Wiirttemberg, Berlin,
1999, pp . 216-217
Footbridge in Waiblingen
D, 1980
Footbridge between Grol i er and Kleiner Erlen-
inscl
Eng ineer : Ing enieu rbiiro Leonhardt und
Andra, Stuttgart
Arch bridge
Tot al length: 23m
Free span: 18m
Width: 2.4 m
Material: Supe rs t r uct ure : reinforced co ncre te ,
Surfa cin g: urethane surfacing, Railings: ste el
Backpack Bridge
D,1999
Foldabl e bridge, can be erec ted by a singl e
person
Architect : Ma ximilian Ruttiger, Unterwossen
Dynamic folding st r uc t ur e , fits in the boot of an
est ate car
Fr ee span : 10 m
Weight : 38 kg
Mat er ial : aluminium
Lit er ature : Kalt enbach, Fr ank , Rucksack-
Bru ckc, in : Detail, 8, 1999, pp.1442-1443
232 Faathr Jges
Bridge in Assens
DK, 1850
Bridge on th e Brahesbor g gro unds
Suspension bridge
Free span: 22 .9 m
Mat eri al: ir on , Surfacing: t imb er
Liter at ure: Cort r ight , Robert S., Bridging th e
World, Wi lsonville, 2003, p. 114
Pont Veil in Alfarras
E,2007
Bridge over th e Nog uera Ribaporcana
Some remnant s of th e or iginal bridge remained
and wer e incorporated int o the const r uct ion of
the new st r uct ure ; an ar ch br idge in th e older
sect ion, t he newer secti on is a cont inuous gir -
der and an arch br idge with suspended deck
Mat er ial : Origin al remn ants: st one , New
st r uct ure: st eel
Bridge in Andoain, Basque Country
E, 2005
Bridge over the Or ia, connec t ing the city cen-
tre wit h a recr eat iona l area
Engineer : Pedelt a, Barcelona
Simple gi rder, frame st r uct ure
Tot al length: 68 m
Wi dth: 3. 6 m
Mat eri al : weathering st eel , Abut ment: rein-
for ced concre te
Lit erature: Sobrino, Juan A. and Javier Jordan,
Two examples of innovati ve design of foot br id-
ges in Spain, in: Footbridge 2005" . znd Int ernati -
onal Confere nce, Dec. 6-8, 2005", Venice,
proceedings, pp. 223-224
Bridge in Bilbao
E.1 997
Footbrid ge in fro nt of th e Guggenh eim
Museu m on th e Abandoibar ra Pr omenade
Engi neer : 10 0M, Bilbao
Architect : Frank O. Gehry and Associat es,
Los Angeles
Free span: (3) m
Width: 7.3 m
Mat eri al: ceme nt, concrete and expanded poly-
st yrene
Liter ature: van Bruggen , Coosje and Frank O.
Gehr y, Guggenh eim Museum Bilbao, Ost fil-
dern, 1997
233
Pasarela Padre Arrupe in Bilbao
E, 2003
Footbridge over th e Ner vion to th e
Uni vcrsidad de Deusto
Engin eer: IDEAM, Madrid
:\ rchitect: Estudio Guad iana, Madrid
(;irder bridge, fold ed sec t ion with ste el rib st if-
kners, integrat ed lighting system
Totallcngth : 14.2. m
Maximum spa n: 84 m
\Vidth : 4 .1 m to II m
Mat eri al : sta inless st eel , Interior cladding: La-
pacho t imbe r
literature : Millanes Mato, Franci sco, La nou-
velle pa sserell e d'Abandoibarra devant Ie musce
Gu ggenheim, Bilbao, in : Bull et in ouvrages
mct all iqucs, 3, 20 0 4 , pp. 26 - 4 9
l.uro Inox (pub.). Trogbrucke in Bilbao,
Spani en, in: Fuflgangerbrucken aus Ede lst ahl
Rostfrci , Lux embourg, 20 0 4 , pp . 18 - 20
Iron Bridge in Girona
E,1877
Footbrrdpe over th e Onyar in th e Pcscaterics
district , al so known as Pont de les Pei scateries
Velles
Engineer : Gu stav e Eiffel , Pari s
Tr uss girder
Material : iron
Literature: Asen sio, Paco, Gu stave Alexandre
EilTel, Dusseldorf, 200 3, pp. 38 -43
Pont d'en Gomez in Girona
E,1916
Bridge also known as Pont de 10 Princeso
Archi t ect : LUIs Holrns
Mat erial : reinforced concrete
Lit erature: see p. 55
Pasarela de Sant Feliu in Girona
E,1996
Footbridge over th e Onyar, connec t ing the ol -
dest city section ne ar Sant Feliu church and De-
vesa Park
Eng ine er : Pcdelta , Bar celona
Architect : Blazqucz -Guantcr Arquit cctes,
Gi rona
Simple girder frame structure
Fr ee span : m
Width:
Material : weathering st eel, Abutment : rein-
forced concrete
Lit er ature : Gomez -Pulido, M. Dolores and
Juan A. Sobrino, Sant Feliu Footbridge in Giro-
na , Spain, in : Footbridge 2002, Nov. 20 -22 , 2002,
Pari s, proce edings, pp .
Schlai ch , Mike (ed .), Saint Feliu Footbridge ,
Spain ( 19 9 6 ), in : Guidelines for the design of
footbridges, Lausanne, November p. Il6
234 Footbr dges
Footbridge in L1eida
E, 2001
Bridge over a roa dway and t wo railway tracks
approximat ely 2 km out side of Lleid a
Engi neer : Ped el t a, Barcelona
Arc h bridge wit h t wo ar ches and t ension cords .
The ent ire bridge was prefabr icat ed and li ft ed
and set int o posit ion on sit e.
Free span: 38 m
Width: 3 m
Material : fibr eglass, Ramps and piers : rein-
for ced concrete
Lit erat ur e : Go mez-Pulido , M. Dolores and
Juan A. Sobrino, A Ne w Glass-Fibre Rein -
forced -Pl ast ic Footbr idge, in: Footbridge 20 02.
Design and dynamic behaviour of footbridges,
Nov. 20 -2 2, 20 02, Pari s, proceedings ,
pp . 187-188
Bridge over the Guadalentin in Lorca
E, 2002
Foot br idge in th e cit y cent re
Engine er : Ca rlos Fernandez Casado , Madrid
Arch bridge wit h suspe nde d deck
Fr ee span: 86 m
Width: 2 x 4 m
Material : st eel
Bridge over the Manzanares in Madrid
E,2003
Footbridge in th e city cent re
Eng ineer : Carlos Fernandez Casado, Mad r id
Cable-s t ayed br idge
Fr ee span: 147 m
Width: 3 m
Mat erial : steel
San Juan de la Cruz Bridge in Palencia
E, 2004
Brid ge over th e Ca r r ion, connect ing th e Islas
Dos Agu as spo r ts cent re
Engineer : Fheco r Ingen ieros Co nsulto res,
Madr id
Cable -st ayed br idge, cur ved br idge deck, no
addit ional r amps despite elevat ion differen ce of
th e two brid geheads
Fr ee spa n: 7 0. 7 m
Width: 3 m
Mat erial : Brid ge gir de r: st eel
Lit eratu re : Ra mo Mar ti n, Jose, Pasar ela sob re
el ri o Car r ion en Palencia, in : Un a r eflexion so -
bre el proyect o de pu entes y pasar elas sobre r ios
en eI ambit o urbano, pp . 2-4
III Congreso de ingenierla civil , territorio y
medic ambient e : Agu a, Biodi versidad e Inge-
ni eria, Zaragoza, 2;- 27 October 20 0 6
235
Bridge in Pontevedra
E,1997
Bridge oyer t he Lcr ez
Enginee r : Fhecor Ingeni ero s Co ns u ltorcs,
Madr id
Arch brid ge with sus pe nde d walkway, bridge
was const r uct ed par all el to th e ri verbank and
rot at ed into it s fi nal positio n using t wo boat s.
Fr ee span: 82. , m
Widt h: + m
Mat eri al: steel
Bridge in Puente la Reina, Pamplona
E, 11 th century
Footbr idge at t he delt a of th e River Robo in
Arga as a pat hway for t he pilgrims tr avelling to
Santiago de Co rnpost el a, also know n as
Puente de los Peregrinos
Brid ge wi t h six ar che s
Lit erat ure : Gr af, Bernhard , Wh ence ther e is
only on e rou t e. Puent e la Reina: t he Pil grims'
Bridge, in: Bri dges th at Changed t he World,
Mu nic h, 2002, PI" 26-27
PontTrencat in Sant Celoni
E, 2003
Renovation of a me die val bridge ove r th e Tor -
dera, destroyed du r ing t he Napoleonic Wars
Enginee r : Alfa Pol aris, Sant Vicen c de Montalt
Arc h brid ge , box sect ion, int egrate d lighting
system
Tot al lengt h: 72m
Maximum span: 2+ m
Width: 3.+ m
Mat eri al : weat hered ste el, concr et e
Lit er atur : Font , Xavi er, Rest aurati on of th e
Pont Tr enca t ( Broken Bridge) , in: Foot bri dge
2005. znd Int ernat ional Conference, Dec. 6-8,
200" Ven ice, proceedings, PI" 11 9-120
Russell , Lisa, Foot br idge Awa r ds 2005, in:
Br idge Design & Engineer ing, +1, 2005,
PI" 35-+9
Pasarela Vallparadfs in Terrassa
E, 2007
Br idge near th e r ecently ren ovat ed park in th e
cit y cent re
Engineer : Pedelt a, Bar celon a
Cont inuo us girder over four suppo r ts , simple
piers ser ve as supports.
Gesamt langc : 100 m
Fr ee span : 3 x 33m
Mat erial : ste el , Bridge gi rder : st eel and conc -
r et e, Abu t ment : r ei nforced conc re te
736
r:ootl:Jrldges
Bridge in Zaragoza
E, 2002
Foot br idge over th e int er-cit y highway Ronda de
la Hispanidad connect ing t wo park areas
Engineer : Ca rlos Fernandez Casado, Madrid
Arch bridge wi t h incl ined ar ch and cent r al deck
Free span: 56 m
Width: 4m
Mat erial: steel
Literature : Astiz, Migu el A. and Miguel A. Gil,
Javier Manterol a, The Ronda de la Hi span idad
pedes t ria n br idge in Zar agoza (Spain), in:
Tubular Str uct ures X, Oxford, 2003, pp . 25-32
Schlaich, Mik e (cd.) , Footbridge acros s th e
"Ronda de la Hi spanidad" , Spai n (2002), in:
Gui del ines for th e design of footbri dges, fib ,
Lausanne, November 2005, p. 127
Expo Bridge in Za ragoza
E, planned for 2008
Multi -st orey footbridge over th e Ebro, ent ra nce
to th e Worl d' s Fair 2008
Engineer: Ar up , Madrid
Architect: Za ha Hadid Ar chit ect s, Londo n
Co mbinat ion of box gi r der and t ru ss beam
Total lengt h: 270 m
Maximum span: 123 m
Width: II m t o 30 m
Material : St ru ct ure : ste el, Exter ior cladding:
fibr eglass conc re te , Surfaci ng : shot cre te
Lit eratur: Ar regui, Ines, Expo Saragosse 2008,
in : Le Co urrier d' Espagn e, August 2006
Pabell on Pu ente, in : Ar chitectur a y critica,
7,2006
Foot bridge inAgen
F, 1841, renovated 2002
Bridge over th e Garonne
Arc hi tect : Ca binet d ' Ar ch it ecture Stephane
Brassie, Agen
Back anchor ed suspension bridge wit h diagon al
hangers
Total length: 263m
Maximum spa n: 174.3 m
Width: 2.3 m
Mat eri al : Mast and cables : st eel
Lit eratur : Passerelle d' Agen : le sauvet age d'un
ouvrage hist orique, in: Chanti ers de Fr ance,
Mar ch 2003, pp. 22-23
Petit , Sebast ien, Deux r ehabilita tio ns nova-
trices, in: Travaux, November 2003, pp . p -5)
Lecinq , Ben oit and Sebastien Petit, Rescue
Mi ssion , in : Civil Engineering Magazin e ,
Januar y 2004
Passerelle de la Fraternite. Aubervilliers
F,2000
Ped est ri an and cycle bridge over th e
Canal Saint -Denis between Q uai Jean -Mari e
Tj ibaou and Quai Adrien Agn es
Ar chit ect : Mimram Ingen ier ie , Pari s
Arch br idge
Free span: 44 m
Materi al : Arch: st eel, Abutment and
platforms: reinforced concre te,
Surfaci ng: t imber
Lit eratur e : Footbridge ove r th e Canal Saint -
Den is, in : Bridge Design & Engineer ing, 29,
4 , 2002
Mehu e, Pierre, Deux siecles de passerell es
metalliqucs, in: Bull etin ouvrages mct all iques,
2, 2002
237
Pont de Gresin. Bellegarde-sur-Valserine
F,1 947
Footbr idge oyer th e Rhone . Origina lly t here
were numero us bri dges here, the most rec ent
was dest royed in 1940 ; a renovat ion of th e cu r-
rent bri dge is planed for 2007
Back-anchored suspensi on br idge wit h t russ stif-
fening girder
Tota l length : 137 .8 m
Span : 114 . 2 m
Widt h: J m
Mater ial: st eel
Passerelle Mataro in Creteil
F, 1988
Also known as Pont Oudry-Mesfy
Archit ect : Santiago Ca latrava, Zuri ch
Arc h br idge , suspende d deck
Total lengt h: 120 m
Maximu m span : H m
Mat eria l: st ee l
Lit eratu re : Ca lat rava , Santiago , Des bow-
st rings originaux, in: Bull et in an nue l de
I'AFGC, Januar y [9 9 9 , pp. S9 -6[
Fr ampton , Ken net h, Ca lat rava Bridges, Basel,
Footbridge in Dole
F, 2005
Bridge oye r t he Doubs
Eng ineer: Quadric, Montl uel
Arch itect: Alai n Spielmann Ar ch itecte, Pari s
Susp ension br idge with two vertica l mast s,
simple gi rder
Free span: 70 m
Wi dth: 3 m
Mat erial: metal
Lit eratu re: Ga nz, Hans-Rudolf, Dole Deli ght ,
in: Bri dge Des ign & Engineering, November
Cele Footbridge in Figeac
F, 2003
Bri dge oyer th e Celc
Arc hit ect : Mimra m Ingcnieri e , Pari s
Tr uss arc h
Tota l len gth : 4 2 m
Fre e spa ns : 2 x 2[ m
Wi dt h: 3 m t o 5 m
Lit erat ure : Brocard , Mau r ice , CAin des Grands [996, pp. 4 4 -53 2005, p. 13
Pon ts , Peronn as, 19 9 1 Mo nte ns , Serge , Cre tci l . Passcrel!e en
bow-string, in: Les plu s beaux pant s de Fr ance ,
Pari s, 200 [ , p. 121
238 Footbridges
Holzarte Bridge near Larrau, Pyrenees
F,1920
Footbr idge over th e Olhadubi River canyo n
Suspe nsion bridge
Passerelle du Commerce in Le Havre
F,1969
Pedetrian and cycle bridge ove r th e Bassin du
Comme rce, also known as Pont de 10 Bourse
Archite ct : Guillaume Gill et
Assymme tric cab le -st ayed br idge , A-shaped
pylon
Tot al lengt h : 105 m
Maximum spa n: 73.4 m
Width: 5.5 m
Lit er at ure : Gr attesat , Guy, Ponts de Fr ance,
Pari s, 1982, pp . 266-267
Walther, Rene, Schr iigseilbr iicken, Lausa nn e/
Dii sseld orf, 1985, p. 160
Bridge in Meylan
F,1980
Footbridge over th e Iser e
Engineer : Ca mpeno n Bernard Co nst ruct ion,
Boulogne-Bill ancourt
Arc hit ect : Cabinet Arsac
Cable-st ayed bri dge wit h upside down Y-shaped
pylon
Total length : 119 m
Maximum spa n: 79 m
Width: 6.7 m
Mat eri al : Cables: ste el, Deck : prestressed co n-
cre te , Pylon s: reinforced concrete
Lit er ature : AFPC (pub.) , Passerell e de Meylan
( Isere) , in: Bull et in 1980-81-82, pp. 397-403
Walther, Ren e, Schragse ilbr ucken, Lausanne/
Diisseldorf, 1985, p. 167
Marrey, Bernard, Les Ponts Mod ernes - 20e
siec le, Pari s, 1995, pp . 213 -214
Passerelle Debilly in Paris
F,1900
Bridge for th e 190 0 World's Fair between Rue
de la Manutetion and Quai Branl v, r en ovat ed
1991
Engi neer : Amedee Alb)', Andre-Louis Lion,
Jean Resal
Ar ch brid ge with two ar t iculatio ns and inter -
medi at e deck girder
Total lengt h: 120 m
Maximum span: 75 m
Width: 8 m
Mater ial: st eel
Lit erature : Ga illa rd, Mar c, Quais et Ponts de
Pari s, Amiens, 1996, P: 169
Poiss on, Jer om e, Passer ell e Debilly, in : Les
Ponts de Paris, Paris, 1999, p. 223
Monten s, Serge , Passer ell e de Bill)', in : Les plus
beau x ponts de Fra nce, Pari s, 2001, p. 115
239
Granite Footbridge in Pari s-La Defense
F, expected September 2007
Footbridge at th e Societ e Generalc Towers con -
necting t he square of t he Grande ATche with th e
new TOl I T Granite in Na nte r re
Engineer : Schlaich Bergermann un d Par tn er,
Stu ttgart
Archit ect : r:eicht inger Archit ec tes , Pari s
Unil at er all y suspe nded cu r ved cable-stayed
br idge with inver t ed syst em , r uns par all el to
th e glazed facad e of t he Societe Generate, a 1.8 m
high glass plat e offers wind prot ecti on for t he
ped estr-ians
Fr ee span: 88 m
Width : 4-., m
Mat er ial : ste el, Wind protection and raili ngs:
impr int ed glass
Lit erature: La passerell e Gra nit e en chant ier,
in : l. c Monit eur des Tra vaux Publ ics et du Bati -
ment , 8 Sept ember 2006 , P: 20
Passerelle Bonnets Rouges in Rennes
F, 1994
Brid ge some ,00 m nort h of t he TGV st ation
Eng ine er: Groupe Alto , Gent illy
Ar chit ect : Fra ncois Deslaugi ers , Mar seille
Fold ing bridge , motor sit uated bet ween th e bo x
secti on girders of t he bri dge deck
Totallcngt h: 4-0m
Fr ee span: 12 m
Lengt h of cant ilever: 8 m
Width: 3.5 m
Mat eri al : st ainles s steel
5arre Bridge in 5arreguemines
F,2001
Pedest r ian and cycle brid ge over t he Ri ver Sar -
re conne ct ing t he cit y ce nt re wit h t he
Casi no park
Engi neer : Jean-Louis Michot ey, Mi chel
Virlogeux
Ar chit ec t : Alain Spielmann Arch it ect e, Paris
Self-anchored, asymmetric susp ens ion bridge
wit h single mast , di agon al hangar s
Total length : 9 0 m
Max imum span: 54-. 4- m
Mat er ial : ste el, rei nforce d concr ete
Lit er ature : Mi chot ey, Jean-Loui s und Alain
Spielmann, Michel Virlogeux, La passer ell e de
Sar re guemines, in: Bull eti n ouvrages metall i-
ques, 1,20 01 , pp. JI6 - 127
Duclos, Thi er ry, La passer elle de Sar re-
guemine s, in : Bull etin ann uel de I'AFGC,
Januar y 20 0 1, pp . 59 - 63
Passerelle du Francs Moisins, St Deni s
F,1 998
Ped estrian an d cycle br idge over t he Canal
Saint -Den is as par t of urban proj ect to revit ali -
ze th e cana l bank
Architect : Mi mram Ingeni er ie, Par is
Ar ch bri dge
Free span: 4-3 m
W idth : 3.5 m to 5 m
Mat erial : ste el
Lit er atur e : Passerelle sur Ie canal de Saint -
Denis , in : L'aci er pou r const r uire, Oktober
19 9 8
Mimra m, Mar c, Passerell e pictonne au-dessus
du canal de Saini -Denis, in : Bull et in pont s
metalliqucs, 19 9 9
Mehu e , Pierre , Deux siec les de passerell es
met alliques, in : Bull etin ouvrages metalliques ,
2, 2002
740 FC'otbr dqes
Passerelle du Barrage in Saint-Maurice
F, 1997
Footbridge over the Marne River between the
road Fernand Saguet de Maison- Alfort and a
promenade
Archit ect s: Mimram Ingeni eri e, Pari s
Arch bridge with doubl e ar ch and three braces,
depth of th e box sect ion minimi zed at the
cent re of th e bridge
Total length: 110 m
Free span: 3 x 37 m
Width: 3.) m to 7 m
Mat erial : Arch: ste el
Literature: Passer ell e sur Ie barrage de Saint-
Maurice, in: L'acier pour const r uire, Oct ober
1998, pp. 36-37
Mimram, Mar c, Passerelle de Saint-Maurice.
Maisons-Alfort, in : Bull etin ponts metalliques,
' 9, ' 999
Passerelle des Deux Rives in Strasbourg
F,2004
Bridge connect ing both sides of th e park for the
border cross ing 2004 Gardening Exhibit ion
Engineers : LAP Leonhardt Andra und Partner ,
Stuttgart and Mim ram Ingeni er ie, Par is
Deck with a slope of up t o 18 percent , less st eep
bridge for pedestrians and cyclis ts
Total lengt h: 390 m
Fre e span: 183.4 m
Width: walkway: 2.5 m, Bike path: 3 m
Mat erial: st eel
Liter ature: Morgenthal, Gui do and Reiner
Saul, Verbindend es Element der grenziibergrei-
fend en Gartenschau, in: Stahlbau-Nachri cht en,
' , 2004 , pp . 9-1/
Passerelle PSOin Toulouse
F,1988
Bridge over a beltway with an asymmetric
st r uct ure, or iented according to th e land scape
Ar chitect s: Mimram Ingeni eri e, Pari s
Console bridge with doubl e cur vat ure
Free span: 7S m
Mat erial : Deck girder : st eel plat e, Surfacing:
timber
Footbridge Parc du Val Joly nearTrelon
F,1980
Engineer s: Arcora, Ar cueil
Ar chit ect : Michel Marot
Back anchored suspension bridge, th in bridge
deck
Free span: 56 m
Width: 2.5m
Material : Cables: st eel, Surfa cing: wood,
Railing: t extile membran
Literature: Baus, Ur sul a, Super be.
FuBgangerbriicke im Pare du Val Joly, in:
db deutsche bauzeitung, 7,1 989, P: 92
241
Mobius Bridge in Bristol
GB, scheduled 2009/ 10
Ped est r ian and cycle bridge between Finzel s
Reach and Cas tle Park
Engineers : Buro Happold, London
Arc hit ects: Hak es Associates Ar chitects ,
London
Truss gir de r
Free spa n: 60 m
Width : 2.7 m to 3m
Material : st ee l, Railing: glass, Handrail : st eel
Lit er ature : Landmark bridge gains planning
per mis sion , in : BSEE Building Services and
Environment al Engin eer, 28Jul y 2005
Mobius Bridge, Bri stol , in : Aro, Novembe r/
December 2005, p. 18
Dryburgh Abbey Bridge in Dryburgh
GB, 1818, 1872
Footbridge over th e Tweed, original bridge
coll apsed and was repl aced in [872
Engineers : John und Willi am Smith
Suspension bridge with cable stays
Maximum spa n: 79 m
Width: 1.4m
Lit er atur e : Stevenson , Rob ert , Description of
Suspen sion Brid ges, in : Edinburgh Philosophi -
cal Journal , vol. 5 , [0, 182[
Tr oit skv, M. S., Cable -Staye d Bridges. Theory
and design, Lond on, [977
Fernand ez Trovano, Leonardo, Tierra sobre el
agua. Vision hi storica univer sal de los puent es,
Madrid, 1999 , pp. 661-6 62
Shakkin' Briggie in Edzell
GB, c. 1900
Footbridge over th e Ri ver North Esk, Scotland
Chain suspen sion bridge, lat er braced with
cant ilever ing transverse gir ders ; four chains at
eac h side
Span : around 30 m
Width : around 1.2m
Millers Crossing Bridge in Exeter
GB,2002
Ped estrian and cycle bridge over th e Exe
between Exeter and Exwick
Engineers : Engine eri ng Design Group, Devon
Co unty Council , Exet er
Asymmetri c cable-st ayed bridge , tufted form,
mill st one acts as counte r we ight
Fr ee span : 54 m
Width: 3 m
Mat erial : Pylon, bridge gir der and cables: steel,
Mill stone : granite, Abutment : reinforced con-
cre t e
242 Footbridges
Pier 6 Airbridgein Gatwick
UK, 2005
Bridge between Pier 6 and th e Nor t h Air po r t
Terminal
Engineer : Arup, london
Archite ct : Wilkinson Eyr e Ar chitect s,
london
Tr uss girder, bridge was pr efabricat ed at the
limits of the airport grounds and assembled and
erec te d within t en days on site
Tot al length: 197 m
Free span: 128 m
Maximum width: II.S m
Mat erial : steel, glass
literature: Gatwick Pier 6 Air Bridge, in : New
St eel Const r uctio n, Jul y 2006 , P: IS
Gat wick Airport , new footbridge linking Pier
Six, in: Th e Architect s' Journal , 24 June 2004,
pp 4-S
Union Chain Bridge in Horncl iffe
UK,1820
Bridge cross ing the Tweed River and connec-
ting England and Scot land
Engineer : Sir Samuel Brown
Back anchore d chain suspension bridge
Maximum span: 112 m
Width: s.sm
Material : Bridge girder and chain: wrought
iron, Surfacing: timber
literature: Stevenson, Robert, Description of
Suspension Bridges, in: Edinburgh Philosoph i-
cal Journal , vol. S, 10 , 18 21
Prade, Marcel , l es grands ponts du monde.
Ponts remarquables d' Eur ope, Poit iers, 1990
Pi con , Ant oin e (ed.) , L'ar t de l' ingcni eur, Pari s,
1997, pp -" .>23-S25
Mill er, Gordon, Uni on Chain Bridge, in: Co n-
fere nce Report of th e Institution of Civil Engi-
neers 159 , May 2006 , pp. 8 8 -95
Sackler Crossing Bridgein Kew
UK, 2006
Foot br idge over a lake in the Royal Bot anic
Gardens
Enginee r : Buro Happold , l ondon
Designer : John Pawson, l ond on
Footbridge spanning in th e longitudinal axis
Tot al lengt h: 70 m
Free span: 70 m
Width : 3 m
Mat eria l: Walkway: granite, Railing: bronze,
Substructure: ste el
liter atu re: Russell , lisa, Route Mast er , in:
Bridge Update, January 200 6
Walk on wat er at Kew, in: Th e Obser ver, 14
May 2006
landscape: John Pawson' s bron ze-railed br idge
is in the tradition of landscape int er ventions at
Kew, in: Archit ecture Today, Jun e 20 0 6 , p. 77
Bridge in Kingston-upon-Hull
UK, scheduled 2008
Bridge over the Hull connec t ing the city cent re
with the development plans on the east side of
the r iver
Engineer : Alan Baxt er & Associates, l ondon
Archit ect: McDowell + Benedetti, l ondon
Wing bridge with m long cant ilever
Free span : 6 0 m
Width: 2 m t o 4 . 5 m
Mat eri al: epoxy coated steel, Surfacing: Epoxy
with mineral aggregat e, Scating and terrace:
timber
literature: Taking a turn on the ri ver, in: bd
Building Design , 12 May 20 0 6
Boom town, in: Building, 12 May 20 06
Swinging bridge clinches competit ion, in: Plan
Magazine, June 200 6
243
NewTelford Bridge in London
UK, 1994
Footbridge in Saint Kath erine marina, or igina l
constr uct ion in 1829 , part s of whi ch r emain
alongside th e modern st r uct ure
Engineer : Morton Partnership , London
Roll bridge
Mat erial: st eel
St Saviour's Dock Bridge in London
UK,1996
Footbridge over hi storic St Saviour' s Dock
Enginee r: Ramboll Whitbybi rd, London
Ar chit ect : Nicholas Lacey & Partners,
London
Cable -st ayed bridge
Tota l length: 34- m
Maximum span: 15.2 m
Lit er ature : Pearce , Martin, Brid ge Build ers ,
London , 2 0 0 2 , p. ' 39
Bridges to Babylon in London
UK,1996
Bridge of for th e Rolling Stones Tour
connect ion th e main stage with an side st age in
th e middle of th e Millennium Dome
Engineer : Ateli er One, London
Designer: Th e Mark Fisher Studio, London
Tempora ry, moveabl e bridge structure, bridge
is mounted to th e main st age , whi ch ser ves as
a count er weight , in closed position, th e side
stage serves as a support.
Fr ee span: 43 m
Width: 2 m
Mat eri al : ste el
Lit erature : Lyall , Sut herla nd, Ingeni eur-Bau-
Kunst. Di e Kon struktion der neuen Form,
Stuttgart , 2002, pp . 1I0 -117
South Quay Bridge in London
UK,1997
Footbridge at th e Canary Wharf grounds
Engine er: Jan Bobrowski & Partners, London
Ar chitect : Wilkinson Eyre Ar chitect s,
London
Asymmetric cable stayed bridge, di agonal
hangers
Fr ee span: 180 m
Width: 6 m
Material : st ee l
244 Footbr dges
Floating Bridge in London
UK, 1999
Bridge at the West India Quay in London
Docklands
Enginee r : Ant hony Hunt Associ ates , Lond on
Archit ect: Fut ure Syste ms, London
Moveable floati ng bridge
Total length: 80 m
Free span: 15" m
Width: 2. 4 m to 3. 6 m
Mat erial : Pier s and supports: stee l , Bridge
gir der : aluminium
Liter ature: Field, Marcus, Docklands-Br iicke
199 6 , in : Fut ure Syst ems . Baut en und Proj ekt e
195"8- 2000 , Heidelberg, 199 9, pp. 84-91
Well s, Matthew and Hugh Pearman,
30 Brucken, Muni ch, 2002, pp. 9 0- 95"
Watan abe, Eiichi , Float ing Brid ges. Past and
Pr esent , in: St r uct ural Engineering Int ernatio-
nal, vol. 13, May 2003, pp. 128- 131
Plashet School Footbridge in London
UK,2001
Footbridge connect ing th e t wo buildings of th e
Plashet Grove School
Engi nee r: Techniker, London
Archit ect : Bird s Portchmouth Russum
Architects , London
S-for m cur ved br idge, spanning over
asymmet r ically formed br idge, me mbrane
roofing
Free span: 67 m
Width: 2. 2 m
Mat erial : ste el and Teflon , Membrane: PTF E-
coate d fibreglass
Liter atu re: Ful3giingerbr iicke in London , in:
Det ail , 5", 200 1, pp. 864-867
Pearce, Martin, Bridge Builder s, London, 2002 ,
pp. 30-3 5"
Wells, Matthew and Hugh Pearman,
30 Briicken, Munich, 2002, pp. 4 8-B
Hungerford Bri dge in London
UK, 2003
Two bridges one on each side of the Charing
Cross Rail Bridge, connect ing Lond on's Sout h
Bank wi t h the West End
Engineer : WSP Group, Lond on
Architect : Lifschut z Davidson Sandilands,
London
Conti nuours girder, inclined mast, deck
suspended by cables
Total lengt h: 315" m
Width: 4 m
Mat erial : Mast s and cables: steel , Bridge girder :
rein for ced concrete , Surfacing: st one til e,
Railing: poli shed st ainless st eel
Bel lmouth Passage in London
UK, Proj ect
Two bridges in Canar y Whar f on the Isle of
Dogs
Engineer : Techni ker , London
Archit ect : Birds Portchmouth Russum
Archit ect s, London
Moveable brid ge, Sout h bridge: Two part swing
br idge, Nor t h brid ge: bascul e bri dge
Free span: Sout h bridge: 32 m , Nor t h bridge:
23 m
Wid th: Sout hbridge: 3 m to 10 m, Nor th
br idge: 1.6 m t o 4 .5" m
Mat erial : Nor t hbr idge: ste el folded st r uct ure
245
Lockmeadow Bridge in Maidstone
UK, 1999
Bridge adjacent to t he Archbishop's Palace
Engineer: Flint & Neill Par tnershi p, London
Archit ect : Wil kinson Eyre Archit ects ,
London
Cable stayed bridge, int egrat ed light ing syste m,
deck as slender as possible to mini mi ze t he
impact on the sur roundings
Tot al length: 80 m
Free span: 4 5" m
Width: 2.I m
Mat eri al : Cable and mast : st eel , Bridge girder:
alum inum
Litera ture : Firth, lan , Tale of Two Br idges, in:
Th e Str uctural Engineer, vol. 80, 2002,
PI" 26 -3 2
Pearce, Mart in, Bridge Builders, Lond on , 2002,
pp. 216-221
William Cookworthy Bridge, St Austell
UK,2005
Bridge over Bodmi n Road
Engine er : Sust rans, Loddiswell
Architec t : David Sheppard Architects ,
Er mington
45"0 mm deep box girder
Free span: 25" m
Widt h: 2.5" m
Material: weatheri ng ste el
Liter ature: Bridge, St . Auste ll, Cornwall David
Sheppard Architects, in: Archit ect ura l Review,
December 2005", PI" 68 - 69
Trinity Bridge in Salford
UK, 1995
Foot br idge connec t ing Salford and Manchest er
Archit ect : Sant iago Calatrava , Zurich
Asymmetric cable-st ayed brid ge, incli ned mast
Tot al length : 78.5" m
Free span: 54 m
Wid t h: 6 m t o I I m
Mat er ial: st eel
Literature: Sharp, Denni s, Landmark li nk .
Architect ura l design of a cable stay bri dge in
Salford, England , in: Arc hit ectural Review,
March [9 9 6
Frampton , Kenneth (ed.), Calatrava Bridges,
Basel , 1996, pp. [88 -[95
Jod idio, Philip, Sant iago Calatrava , Cologne,
199 8 , pp. [48-[5[
NorthbankBridge in Stockton
UK, Project
Pedestri an and cycle br idge over the Tees near
t he city cent re
Engine er: WSP Group, London
Architect: Lifschut z Davidson Sandi lands,
London
Cable stayed bri dge with t wo asymmetric
consoles, bridge girder const r ucte d as a frame,
int egrat ed light ing
Maxi mum span : 27.5 m
Mat eri al : Console: concrete, weathering steel
246 Footbridges
Bridge in Cascine di Tavola
1,2003
Footbridge over the Filimortula, or ignal bridge
destroyed by retreating German troops in 1944
Engineer: Alessandro Adil ard i, Pr ato and
Lor enzo Frasconi, Prato
Back-anchor ed suspension bridge, cables fixed
to the ends of the mast
Free span: 18.4 m
Width: 2.6 m
Material: ste el , Surfacing: timber
Literature: Oper e 09 - Rivista Toscana di
Architettura, vol. 3, June 2005
Trepponti in Comacchio
1, 1634
Footbridge in the city cent re at the confluence
of three (or iginally five) canals, also known as
Pont e Pallott a, rebuilt several times
Architect : Luca Dan ese di Ravenna
Arch bridge, five wit h stai r ways leadin g to
a high platform, flanked by two tower s
Mat erial : Pietra d'lstria, a typ e of stone
Literature: Cor t r ight , Robert 5., Bridging the
World, Wilsonvill e, 2003, P: 181
Passerella Rari -Nantes in Padua
I, Project
Pedestrian and cycle bridge between th e Via
Isonzo and the Via Vitt ori o Veneto
Engineer : Enzo Siviero , Padua
Archit ect : Progeest , Padua
Arch bridge with two ar t iculatio ns
Free span: 75 m
Width: 4 m
Material : ste el , timber
Passerella Olimpica in Turin
1,2006
Bridge over railway platforms between the
former Mercati Gener ali and the Lingotto
Architect /Engi nee r : Hugh Dutton Associes,
Pari s
Arch br idge with 69 m high arc h, suspended
deck
Total length: 385 m
Maximum span: 150 m
Width: 4 .3 m
Material : Arch: st eel
Literature: Aydemir, Murat , Olympic ar ch
gives Lingotto a lift , in: Bridge Design &
Engineer ing, vol . 12, March 2006, p. 16
Beidel er , Juli en and Philippe Donnaes, L'arc
sous toutes ses formes, in: Le Moniteur des
Travaux Publi cs et du Batiment, 30 Mar ch 207,
pp.64-70
247
Bridge in Venice
1,1963
Ent rance to the Palazzo Quer ini Stampalia,
near Campo San Marco
Engineer : Pier o Maschi ett o
r\ rchitc ct: Carlo Scar pa , Venice
Arch br idge
Free span: 8 m
Width: 1.6 m
Mat erial : Arch and railin g: iron, Several
st airs: st one, Surfacing and hand rail : timber
Ponte PiazzaIeRoma in Venice
I, under const ruction
Bridge over the Canal Gr ande connec t ing t he
railway stat ion with the Piazzale Roma
Archit ect : Sant iago Ca lat rava, Zurich
Tot al length: 94 m
Free span: 77 m
Mat eri al: steel , glass
Nesciobrug in Amsterdam
NL,2006
Pedestrian and cycle br idge over the new
suburb of IJburg over Amsterdam's Rhin e
Cana l
Engineer : Ar up, Lond on
Architec t : Wilkinson Eyre Architects, London
Suspension bridge with one main cable, curved
bridge girder
Tot al length: 790 m
Free span : 168 m
Width : Walkway: 2m, Cycle path : 3.) m
Mat er ial : Bridge: st eel, Approach
ramp s: concret e
Dunajec Footbridge, SromowceNizne
PL,2006
Foot bri dge over the Sromowce Nizne in Poland
and Cc r vcnv Klastor in Slovakia
J
Enginee r: Most y Wroclaw Design and Resear ch
Offi ce, Wr oclaw, Jan Biliszczuk
Cable-stayed bridge
Tot al length: 1) 0 m
Maximum span: 90 m
Width: 3,) m
Mat erial : Pylon , half frams and wind
protecti on : steel, Deck girder: laminat ed
timber, Sur facing: stone pine timber
Liter ature: Russell , Lisa, Elegant footbri dge
connects bord er resorts, in : Bridge Design &
Engineer ing, vol. 12 , December 2006, p. 8
248 References
References
The bibliographic references for individual
bridges and themes are given on the pages
concerned.
AMOUROUX, Dominique and Betrand
Lemoine, L'age d'or desponts suspendusen France
1823-1850, APC nouvelle serie, 1981
BAUERNFEIND, C. M., Briickenbaukunde,
Stuttgart, 1872
BIELER, Walter, Taler mit Holz iiberspannen.
Holzkonstruktionen im Briickenbau, in : archithes e,
32,6, 2002, PP. 30-33
BILL, Max, Robert Maillart, Zurich, 19H
BILLINGTON, David P., Robert Maillart, Zurich /
Munich, 1990
BILLINGTON, David P., The Art <fStructural
Design: A Swiss Legacy, Princeton, 2003
BISI, Luigi , 1ponti inferro italiani nell'ottocento,
in : Casabella, 469,1981
BLAKSTAD, Lucy, Bridge- The Architecture <f
Connection, Basel/London, 2002
BOGLE, Annette , Peter Cachola Schmal and
Ing eborg Flagge (cds), Leicht, weit. Light
Structures. jorg Schlaich, Rudo!fBergermann,
Exhibition catalogue, Munich, 2003
BONATZ, Paul and Fritz Leonhardt, Briicken,
Konigstein im Taunus, 1952
BROCKSTEDT, Emil, Die Entwicklung des lnpe-
nieurholzbausam Beispiel der bolzemen Briicken im
Zeitraum von 1800-1940, Braunschweig, 1994
BROWN, David, Briicken, Munich, 1994
BRunWILER, Eugen and Christian Menn, Stahl-
betonbriicken, Vienna/New York, 2003
BRUNNER, JOSEF, Beitragzur geschichtlichen
Entwicklung desBriickenbaues in der Schweiz,
PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Bern, 1924
BUHLER, Dirk, Briicken, Munich, 2004
CARAMELLE, Franz, HistorischeBriickenbauten
in Nord- und Osttirol, in : Industriearchaologie
Nord-, Ost-, Siidtiro] und Vorarlberg, Inns-
bruck, 1992, pp . 79-95
CORTRIGHT, Robert S., Bridgingthe World,
Wilsonville, 2003
DAIDALOS, Briicken/Brulqes, Gutersloh, 57, [995
DEHN, Frank, Klaus Holschemacher and
Nguen V. Tue (eds), Neue Entwicklungen im
Briickenbau. Innovationen im Bauwesen, Beitrage
aus Praxis und Wissenschaft, 2004
DESCZYK, Di eter, Horstpeter Metzing and Eck-
hard Thiemann, Berlin und seine Briicken, Berlin,
23
DESWARTE, Sylvie and Betrand Lemoine,
L'architecture et les ingenieurs. Deux siecles des
realisations, Paris, 1997
DIETRICH, Richard J ., Faszination Briicken,
Munich, 1998
EVERT, Sven, Briicken. Die Entwicklung der Spann-
weiten und Spteme, Berlin, 2003
FEDOROV, Sergej G., Wilhelm von Traitteur. Ein
badischerBaumeisterals Neuererin der russischen
Arcbitelaur 1814-1832, Berlin, 2000
FERNANDEZ TROYANO, Leonardo, Bridge
Engineering. A Global Perspective, London, 2003
FIRTH, Ian, NewMaterialsfor Modern Footbridges,
in : Footbridge 2002, pp . 174-186
FOOTBRIDGE 2002, Design and dynamic
behaviour of footbridges, International
Conference, November 20-22, 2002, Paris,
proce edings
FOOTBRIDGE 2005, znd International
Conference, December 6-8 , 2005, Venice,
proceedings
FRAMPTON, Kenneth, Anthony C. Webster and
Anthony Tischhauser, CalatravaBridges,
Basel/ Boston / Berlin, 2004
FUCHTMANN, Engelbert, Stahlbriickenbau,
Munich, 2004
GERLICH, Franz, Briicken in Tirol, Innsbruck
(1956)
GRATTESAT, Guy, Porus de France, Paris, 1982
GRAF, Bernhard, Bridges that Changedthe World,
Munich/London/New York, 2002
GRUNDMANN, Friedheim, Hamburg- Stadt der
Briicken, Hamburg, 2003
GRUNSKY, Eberhard, Von den Arifangendes
Hdnqebriickenbaus in Wesifalen, in : Westfalen, 76,
1988 (1999), pp. 100- 159
HOLGATE, Alan, The Work <fjorg Schlaich and his
Team, Stuttgart/London, 1997
JURECKA, Charlotte, Briicken. Historiscbe
Entwicklung - Faszination der Tecbnik, Vienna/
Munich, 1986
KAHLOW, Andreas, Briicken in der Stadt . Der
Potsdamer Stadtkanal und seine Briicken, Potsdam,
2001
KEMP, Emory L., Links in a chain. The development
<fsuspensionbridges 1801-1870, in : The Structural
Engineer, 8, [979, pp.2H-263
KILLER, Josef, Die Werke der BaumeisterGruben-
mann, Basel/Boston/Stuttgart, [985 (I: Zurich
1941)
KNIPPERS, Jan and Don-U Park, Briicken aus
glaifaserverstarktenKunstst1Jen, in : db deutsche
bauzeitung, 5, 20 3, pp. 75-80
KURRER, Karl -Eugen, Geschichte der Baustauk,
Berlin, 2002
LAMBERT, Guy (ed.) , LesPonts de Paris, Paris ,
1999
LEONHARDT, Fritz, Ingenieurbau. Wissenschaitler
planen die Zukurift, Darmstadt, 1974
LEONHARDT, Fritz, Briicken /Bridges,
4: Munich, 1994
LEONHARDT, Fritz and Karl Schachterl e,
Die Gestaltunq der Briicken, Berlin, 1936
MAGGI, Angelo and Nicola Navone (eds) ,john
Soane and the Wooden Bridges<fSwitzerland: Ar-
chitecture and the Culture<fTechnologyfrom
Palladioto Grubenmanns, Exhibition cataloque,
Archivio del Moderno, Mendrisio, 2003
MARREY, Bernard, Les Ponts Modernes -
18e et 1ge siecles, Paris, 1990
MARREY, Bernard, Les Ponts Modernes -
20e siecle, Paris, 1995
MEHRTENS, Georg, Der DeutscheBriickenbau im
XIX. jahrhundert, Berlin, 1900, Reprint: Dussel-
dorf, 1984
MEHUE, Pierre , Deux steeles de passerelles
metalliques, in: Bulletin ouvrages metalliques ,
2,2002, pp. 10-39
MELAN, Joseph, Eiserne Bogenbriicken und Hdnqe-
briicken, Leipzig, 1906
MELAN, Joseph, Der Briickenbau, vol. 1,
Leipzig, 1922
MENSCH, Bernd and Peter Pachinke (eds),
leicht und weit - Briicken im neuen Emschertal,
Exhibiti on cat alogue , Obcrhausen, 2006
MONTENS, Serge , l.cs plus beaux ponts de France,
Pari s, 200 [
MUCHA, Aloi s, Holzbriicken. Statische Systeme,
Konst rukti otisdetail s. Beispiele, Wi esbaden and
Berlin ,
lV\ URRAY, Peter and Mary Anne St even s,
l.i vinq Bridges. The Inhabited Bridqe: Past, Present
and Fut ure, Muni ch / New York, [996
MUSTAFAVl , Mohsen (cd .) , Structure as Space.
Engineering and Archirecture in the Works ifJiirg
Conzett and his Partners, London, 2006
NELSON, Gilli an , Highland Brid8es, London,
[ 9 9 0
O STER, Han s, Fuss8iin8erbriicken vonJor8 Schlaich
und RudolfBer8ermann, Exhi bit ion cat alog ue ,
Stuttgart , [992
P.\USER, Alfred , Briicken in Wien. Ein Fiihrer
durch die Bauqeschichi c, Vienna /New York, 200 5"
PEARCE, Mart in , Brid8e Builders, London, 2002
PELKE, Eberhard , Wi el and Ramm and Klaus
St iglat , Geschichte der Briicken. Zeit der lnq enieure,
Ger mersheim, 200 3
PETERS, Tom Frank, Transitions in Enqineerinq.
Guillaume Henri D'!four and the Early 19th Century
Cable Suspension Bridoes, Basel/Boston, [987
P[ CON, Antoine , Navier and the Introduction if
Suspension Bridqes in France, in : Construct ion
Hi stor y, vol. 4 , [988
PLOWDEN, David , Brid8es, Ne w York /London,
1974
PRADE, Mar cel, l.es ponts monuments hi st oriqu es,
Poiti crs, [986
RI CHARDS, J.M . , The National Trust Book OJ
Bridqes, [984
RUKWIED, Hermann , Briickeniisthetik , Berli n ,
1933
RUSSEL, Lisa, Footbridqe Awards 2005, in :
Bridge Design & Engineering, vol. n , 41, 2005" ,
PI" 35"-49
R()DER, Georg Ludwig Augu st, Practische
Tr arstelluna der Briickenbaukunde nach ihrem8anzen
UmJ an8, 2 vol s, Darmstadt , l82l
SCHLAICH, Jorg and Matthi as Schulle r ,
Inqeni eurbaui- iihrcr Baden-Wiirttemberg, Berlin,
1999
SCHLAICH, Jiir g, Briickenbau und Bauhuuur, in :
Di e alte St adt , 3[,2004, NO 4 , PI" 24[ -246
SCHLA[CH, Mike (ed .), Guide lincsi or the
desiqn ifJootbrid8es, fed eration inte rnat ionale du
bet on , bulletin 32, Lau sanne , Nov. 2005"
SCHLAICH, Mike , LastJall Fussvolk. Ausserqewohn -
li che Fussqdnq erbriicken aus aller Welt, in :
db deut sch e bauzeitung, 6, 200[ , pp. 105- [1 2
SERRES, Mich el , I.'art des ponts: homo pont!fex,
Paris, 2006
SIV[ERO, Enzo, 1/ ponte e I'ar chit euura, Ci tta
Studi Edizione , Milano, [9%
SPERLICH, Martin (ed .) , Uberbriicken, in : Dai-
dalo s 57, Berlin, [995"
STADELMANN, Werner , Holzbriicken in der
Schwei z ; Chur, [990
STADELMANN, Werner, St. Galler Briicken,
St. Gallen, [987
STEINMAN, Da vid B. , A Practi cal Treatise On
Suspension Brid8es, 2, 1929
STiGLAT, Kl aus , Briicken am We8' Friihe Briicken
aus Eisen und Beton in Deutschland und Frankrei ch,
Berlin, [996
STlGLAT, Kl au s, Bouinqenieure und ihr Werk,
Berlin, 2004
STRASKY, Jiri, Precast Stress-Ribbon and Suspen-
sion Pedestrian Bridqes, FlP Symposium, Kyoto,
[993, vol. 2
STRAS KY, Jiri , Stress ribbon and cable-supported
pedestrian brid8es, London, 2005"
STRAUB, Han s, Die Geschicbt e der Bauinoemeur-
kunst , Basel , 1992
TORRES ARCILA , Mar tha, Brid8es - Ponts :
Briicken, Mexico City , 2002
TRAUTZ, Martin, Eiserne Briicken in Deutschland
im 19. Jahrhundert, Dusseldorf, [99[
TRAUZETTEL, Ludwig, Briickenbaukunst , in :
Unendlich schon. Das Ga rtenrei ch Des sau-
W orlitz, Unesco Er be , Berl in, 2005
TROJANO > FERNANDEZ TROYANO
VD!. GES. BAUTECHNIK im Verein Dt . Ingeni -
eure (pub.) , We8bereiter der Baut echn ik : herausra-
gende Bauiriqenieure utul technische Pioni erleistun-
gen in ihr er Zeit, Dusseldorf, [990 (ser ies
r ep rint 1983-1989)
WAGNER, Ro semarie and Ralph Ege r mann , Die
ersten Drahtkabelbriicken, Mi tteilungen des SFB
64 , vol. 87, Stuttgart , 1985
WALTHER, Ren e, Schriigseilbriicken, Lau sanne /
Dusseldorf, [994
WELLS, Matthew and Hugh Pearman,
30 Briicken, Miinchen , 2002
WERNER, Er nst, Die ersten Ketten- und Drahtseil-
briicken. Technikgeschichte in Einzeld arstellun-
ge n , 28, Dusseldorf, 1973
249
WHI TNEY, Charles S., Brid8es- A Study in Their
Art, Science and Evolution, New York , 1929
WIRTH, Hermann, Technik. Zeupnisse der
Produkt ions- und Verkehrsqeschichte, Berlin /
Leipzi g, 1990
WITTF OHT, Hans, Building Bridoes, Dusseldorf,
[9 84
WITTI'OHT , Hans, Briickenbauer aus Leidenscheift,
Dusseldorf, 2005
ZUCKER, Paul, Die Briicke. '1J'pologie und
Gcscbi cbie ihrer kiinstlerischen Gestauunq, Berlin,
[9 21
INTERNETSOURCE
www.structurae .com
www.bridjjemei st er.com
250 Architects, Engmeers
Architects, Engineers
A BERNET HY, J ame s 47
A CKERMANN, C h r istoph 22 7
ACKERMAN N, Kurt 108
ACKERMANN UND PARTNER A RCHIT EKTEN 22 7
ADILARDl , A le s san d ro 246
AFAssOCIADOS 14 0
ALAN BAXTER & ASSOCI ATES 242
A LBERT, Julius W ilhelm 42
ALBERT SPEER & PARTN ER 2 2)
ALBERTI, Le on Ba ttista 22
A LBY, Amede e 23 8
AMMANN, O t h mar H erm ann 4 9
AN DR EOTTI & PARTNERS 2 10
A NTHONY H UNT A SSO CIAT ES 244
APARICIO, A n g el C. 14 6
ARNODI N, Ferdi nand 181
A RSAC 23 8
A RUP, ave N iq u i st ) 9 , 6 6
A RUP 224,236, 242,247
A RUP > aVE A RUP & PARTNERS
A RZADUN, F e rnan do H
asp A RCHIT EKTEN 231
ATELI ER ONE 243
AUMULLER, Britta 20 2
BACHOFNER, Rol f 212
BALDI SCH W I LER , Bl a s ius 24
BALM ON D, C eci l 140
BANDHAUER, C h ristian Gottfrie d H e inrich 34
BAZAI N E, P i e r r e- Dom i n iqu e 4 0
BEDNARSKI > STUDIO B EDNAR SKI
BER DO LY ET Dur-ouv 40
BER GERMANN, Rudol f 9 2
B ETANCOURT, Augusti n
BI ELER , Walte r 132, 17 2, 220
BI ELMEI ER & W ENZL 179
BILISZCZU K, J AN 247
BI LL, M a x )6
BIRDS P ORTCH MOUTH R USSU M 244
BIRo, A. 217
BLAZQ U EZ-GUANTER ARQUITECT ES 233
BLONDEI. , Pie rre 218
BOBROWSKI > J AN BOBROWSKI & PARTN ER
BO LLI NGER + G RO HMANN 2 16 , 223
BONATZ, Paul ) 9 , 62 , 64
BRASSI E, Stephane 236
B RIX, Adol p h Fe rdi nan d W e nzeslaus 4 8
BROWN, Si r Samuel 36,242
B RUNI NGHOFF UND R AMPF I NGEN I EU R E 2 2)
BRU N EI. , Is a m bard King d o m 36
BRUNS, A . 38
BUCKMI NST ER F ULLER, Ri chard 71
BURKHARDT, Berthold 28
B URY, C laus 226
CALATRAVA, Santiago 136 , 163 ,164- 16 7 , 237 , 24 ) , 247
CAMPEN ON BER NARD C ONSTRUCTION 238
CARLOS F ER NANDEZ C ASADO III , 234, 236
CESSART, Loui s A lexan dre d e 26
C HALEY, J o seph 41
CHABLAIS ET P OFF ET 1)0
CHAMBER S, William 28
C IVIL ENGIN EER INGS SOLUTIONS 17 0
CONZ ETT BRONZIN I G ARTMANN 8 o , 122, 18 8 , 212,
216 ,221
CONZ ETT, J ii r g B
C ORAY, R ichard )2
C ROZET & J OUR DAN 4 0
C ULMANN , K arl )2
D A PONTE, A n tonio 1) 8
D ARBY I , Abrah a m 26
D AR BY III , Abraham 26
DASHWOOD, Francis 28
D AU N ER , J OLI AT & AS SOCI ES 98
D AVID R OW ELL ENGI N EERS 4 7
D AVID S HEPPARD A RCHITECTS 24)
D ECK ER I NGENI EURGESELLSCHAFT 223
D ESLAUGI ERS, Francois 239
DELESSERT, Benj amin 4 2
D ESIGN L ABOR B RE ME RHAVEN 22 4
D EVON C OUNTY COUNCIL 24 1
DICK, Rud ol f 17
DI CK BAU ER, F rank 1)2
DI ETRICII , Richard 22),227,228
DILLER S COFIDIO + R EN FRO , 22 1
D I LLON, J a cque s 26
D ISCHINGER , Franz )9, 6 4
DOMENIG & WALLNER 216
D OMI NGO F ERRE A RCH IT ECTS 14 6
DOSWALD , Cor n el 8
DREDGE, J a m e s 36
D R EW RY, C har le s St uart 4 6
DUFOUR, G u i llaume H enri 41,42,44
D YCKE R HOFF & WIDMAN N ) 4, 6 4, 130
EGGER , H a r al d 2 16
E I ERMAN N, Egon 224
EIFFEL, G u s tave 40, 233
E SSEX, J a m e s 22
E RDMANNSDORFF, Friedrich W il helm von 28
ESTUDIO G UADIANA 23 3
ETH ERIDGE, William 22
F EI CHTI NGER ARCH IT EKTEN 144,163,167,239
F EICHTINGE R, Di e t mar 177
F EEG E & G OTTHAR D )4
F EHLI NG, R e n ate 200
FHECOR I NGEN I ER OS C ONSULTORES 23 4 , 23)
F ERNANDEZ TROYANO, Le onard o 10 6
F ICHNTER + KOPP L 228
F IN K, Albe rt 138
F INLEY, J ame s 36
F I NSTERWALDER, Ulrich )9,64, 72, 82 , 130
Fmsco 126
FI RT H, I an > FLINT & N EIL L
F ISCHER VON ERLACH, J oha n n Bernha r d 34, 38
F LI NT & N EILL PARTN ER SH I P 96, 110,136, 1)4,24)
FOHL, Klaus 8
FONSECA, Ant o n io Ada o cia 14 0
F OSTER ASSOCIATES 16 8
F R ASCONI , L orenz o 246
FRANK O . G EHRY AND ASSOCIATES 232
FRASIN E, H einz 222
FREI OTTO> OTTO
FR EYSSI NET, E uge ne 62
FUTU RE SYSTEMS 24 4
Fus s, N i kolaus 4 0
GEESI N, R on 15 6
GENI NAS CA D El . FORTRI E 150
GERBER, H ei nri ch 22 9
GERKA N M ARG & PA RTNER 18 2, 226
G I HORD & PART NERS 18 6
( ; ILL ET, G ui llau m e 238
I NGENI EURP LANU NGE N 228
CRA NI CH ER, Gu st av 38
ClUJ'!' & PARTNER 126
GROUPE A LTO 239
GRUBE N;\ IAN N, J ohanne s 23
GRUBENMANN, H ans Ul rich 23, 159
H ACKHOfER , Jo se f 2 17
Hxn m, Zaha 14 9 , IS8 , 236
H ART EL & SCH I ER MEYE R 224
I-L\u s u-:, Martin 2 16
H AL\I ER L, Peter 179
I-l AKES ASSOCIATE S 241
H A,\ DI , Thorst cn 202
H APPO LD, BURo 24 1,242
H AZARD s \ YHI T E 42
H FATH ERWI CK ST UDIO 19 0
H EGGER H EGGER SCH LEIFI' 223
H EI NSEN, Hein 20 4
H ENK E- SCHR EI ECK ARCH ITE KTEN 2 18
H EN NEBI QU E, Francois 55
H ESSE, Lu dwig Ferd i nand 4 8
H OAR E, H enr y 28
H OUI S, Luis 55 ,2B
HOSSDORF , H einz 8 0
Hucr .r, M art in 22 1
HUGH DUTTO N ASSOCI ATES 246
HU NT, A n t h o ny > ANTHONY HUNT A SSOCIATES
!DE A M 233
!DaM 232
ifb F RO HLOH STAFFA KiiHL EC KE R 134
I NGENI EURGRUPPE BAUEN 22 2
J AN BOBROWSKI & PART NER S 174, 243
J AN ST()RlIIER PARTNER 225
J ANSO N + 'vVOLERIL\1 2 2
J ESSE, Di rk 227
J O H NSON, Phil ipp 60
Jus s ow, H e inri ch C hr is top h 33
K AAG + SC H WARZ 230
K AUFMAN N, H ermann 15 2
K AWAl\I ATA, T adashi 178
KIRCH ER ,
K IR KLAND , A lexan d e r 36
KI STER SCHE ITHAUER GROSS 224
KLENZE, Le o von 38
K NI GH T, Marti n 8
K NIPPERS H ELBIG I NGENI EURE
KO EN EN, M athias 54
KONI G UND H EU NI SCH 22 5
KU BLER U ND LE IBBRA ND 4 8
Kii NZLE, O tto 220
KU PPLER, J ohann G eorg 34
LACH ENM AN N, G ust! 230
LAM BOT, J o seph Loui s
L AP L EONHARDT A NDRA UNO PARTN ER 8 8 E., 90,
13 1, 176, 23 1, 240
LAUB E I NGENI EU R E 22 1
LAUGI ER , M arc Antoi ne 2 1
LEE, R icha rd 46
L EN l': E, Peter J o s e ph 32,202
L EO NH ARDT, Fr it z 49,59 ,62 ,92
LI ESS, J ohanne s 200
LI FSCHUTZ DAVIDSO N SAN DI LANDS 13 8,244, 245
LI GNUM C ONSULT A NGER ER & PA RT NER 153
LI ON, A n d re- Lou is 238
L OD O LI , Carlo 2 1
L ()S CHER, Carl Imm anuel 34
L OHM ER , Ger d 62,64
LUTZ, LOHRE R, EGENHOEER 229,23
M +G I NGENIEURE 2 17
M AI LLART, Robert 56,60, 124
M ALI NOWSKY, M AR C > G RO UPE ALTO
M ANTERO LA, J a vier III , 13 6
> CARLOS F ER NANDEZ CASA DO
MA RG, Volkwin 18 9
MAROT, M ichel 24 0
M ARTE, MARTE A RC HITEKTEN 2 17
M ARTI N, G e org e 36
M ASCHI ETTO, Pi ero 247
M ASON O RDl SH , R ol and 3 6
M AYR LUDESCH ER
M cDOW ELL + BENEDETTI 242
M EH RTENS, G e org 38, 48
M El LI PETER ARCHITEKTEN 2 16
M EN N, C h r is t ian 72
MI CH OTEY, J e an- L ouis 239
MIMRAM I NGENI ERI E 23 6 , 23 7,239,24 0
MIMRAM , Marc 14 2
MI TI S, Ignaz von 39
M OHRI NG, Bruno 222
M OGORAY, A n dre 44
M O NI ER , J o se ph 54
M ORANDI , Ric c ardo 60
M ORSCH , E m i l 55
M O RTON PARTN ERSHI P 243
M ORY, Hans 72
M OSTY W ROCLAW D e sign and R e s e a r ch Office 247
NAV I ER, C la u de H enri 4 2,44
N ERVI , Lui gi 60
N EY & PARTN ERS 218
N ICHOLAS LACEY & PARTN ERS 243
NODE ENGINEERS 206
OHMAN N, Friedrich 217
ORDl SH, R owland M a s on 36
OTTO, F RE I 4 9
aVE ARUP & PART NERS 140, 16 8
251
252 Architects, Engineers
PALLADIO, A n drea 22, 158
PALM, M ichael 229
PAUL, Marti n 2[ 7
PAUSER, A lfred 2[8
PAWSON, J ohn 242
P EDELTA 232,233,234
P ERRONET, Je a n R odolphe 20
P ETER UNO LOCHNER 23[
PLAGNIOL, Brun o 4 2,43
P OLARI S, A lfa 235
POLONCEAU, A ntoine Remv 26
P OLONYI > STEFA N P OLONYI & PARNTER
P RI TCHAR D, Thomas Farnol 26
PROGEEST 246
PUSHAK AR KTE KTE R 208
Q UADRIC I NGENI EU RE 237
R AMBOLL WHITBY BI RD
> W HITBY, BIRD & PARTN ERS
R EDPATH & BROW N 36
R EIT ZEL, Erik 204
R ELLI NG BAUSTATIK 229
R ENNI E, J ohn 26
R ESAL, J e a n 238
R FR RI CE FRANCIS RI CHI E [44, 226
RIIl ERA, J Os e Eugen io 166
RI COLAI S, R o b ert Le 160
RI EBENBAUER, J ohann 153
RITTER , Karl Wilhelm 52, 56
RI TTER, J o s ef 24
R OEBLI NG, J ohann August 38, 4[ ,42
R UTTI GER, M a ximili an 23 I
R UETTI MANN, T oni 198
RUF, Se p 224
SAUERZAPFE, Martin '34
SAUNDERS, Todd 206
SCARPA, Carlo 24 7
SCHLAICH BERGERMANN u nd PARTN ER
78,79,90 ,92,108,112, [ [ 4 , [82 -[85, 189 ,
222,226,2 27,228,229,230,239
SCHLA ICH, J org 49 ,71 , 90 , 92, [3[, [60
SCHONHERR, Torben 204
SCHULITZ + PARTNER 226
SCK ELL , Fri e drich Ludwig von 32
SEGUIN, Marc 4 2
SEGUIN, Jul e s 4 2
SIVI ERO, Enzo 246
SKM ANTHONY HUNTS [90
SM EATON, J ohn 54
SMITH, J o hn 36, 47, 24 [
SMITH, W i lliam 36, 47,241
SOANE, Si r J ohn 22
SOBEK > W ERNER SOBEK I NGENI EURE
SPEER > ALBERT SPEER & PARTNER
SPIELMANN, A lai n 237,239
STAUBLI, KU RATH & PARTNER [ 24 , 221
ST EFAN POLONYI & PAR NTER 224
STIGLAT, K lau s 59
ST ORMER > J AN STORMER PART NER
STRASKY, J i ri 76 , 94, [36, 22[
STROBL, Wolfgang [77
STUDIO BEDNARSKI 76
SUESS UNO STALLER I NGENI EURE 227
S USTRANS 245
T AMMS, Frie d rich 88
T ECHNIK ER 24 4
T ELFORD, T homas 36
T HE M ARK F ISHE R ST UDIO 24 3
T ODT, Fritz 59
T ORROJ A, Eduar do 68
TORROJA, J ose Antoni o 68 , 166
T ORTI , Fabi o 210
T RAI TTEUR, W ilhelm von 4 0
TRI EST, Fe rdi n a n d von 32
T ROYANO, Le onardo F ER NAN DEZ
> FE RNANDEZ TROYANO, Le onardo
U W E TIETZE & PAR NTER 224
VERANTIUS, FAUST US 38
VIFQUAIN, J e an Baptiste 39, 4 4
VICAT, Loui s -Jo s eph 4 2, 54
VI EZENS, Lu dwig 229
VIRLOGEUX, Michel 239
VOGEL + PARTNER 228
WALTH ER, R ene 72, 80 , [30
WAYSS, G u stav Adolf 54
W EBSTER, 11 174
W EIL AND, Si lvio 227
W EISZ, H . 74
W ENAWESER, O tto 74
W ERN ER SOBEK I NGENI EURE 225
W E S & PARTNER 228
W I EGAND, W erner [7 8
WHITBY, BIRD & PARTNERS '36, 156, 24 3
WI LH ELMSEN, T ommie 206
W IL KIN SON EY RE 110, '36, 154, 156 , 163,
174 , 186,24 2,243,24 5,247
W IL KINSON, J ohn 26
WOLFENSB ERGER, Rudo l f 74
WSP Gr-ou e 24 4 , 245
Z EININGER ARCHITEKT EN 2 [8
Z IAN E 218
Z I ESEL , Wolfdietrich 2 [7
3 LHD [ 70
Index of Places
ACHBE RG 49
A(;E:--I 236
AUARRAS 23 2
A .\ \S TE R DA:' \ 24 7
A:--IDOAIN 231
ANG ERS 41,1 0 0
A:--INOKAY 4 3
AR DEZ ' 3, P
A SSE:--I S 2 )2
AUBERYIl.I.IERS 236
BAD HO .\l BU RG VON DER H OH E 222
B.-\DEN -BADE N 222
BAMBERG 38
BARCEl. O NA
Las Glorias Bridge 10 6
Port Bridge 14 6
BARUTH 202
BASEL 219
B ED FORD 174
B FI . I. H ; ARDE- SUR- VAl. SER I N E 2 37
B ENSH EIM 2 22
B ER G EN 206
B ERLI N
.tbtei Bridge 223
Brid,qe in the Chatl ott enburq Pare 32
Gericke Footbridge 222
Gothenbura Footbri dqe 223
Lion Bridqe 48
B ERLI N K O P ENI C K 19 3
BERN E 39
B ERWI CK 36
BI LBAO
Campo de Volancin Bridge 166
Museum Bridge 232
Pasarela Padre Arrupe 233
Ponce da Ribera H
BIRCHERWEID 7 2
B O CHUM
Nordpol Bridge 223
West Park Bridge I 12 , I 19
BO DMI N , C ORNWALL 96
BO BLI N G EN 2 2 3
BOUDRY 1) 0
BRAN DEN BURG AN DER HAV EL 224
BR EM EN
Bridge by G. Wayss H
Port Bridge Vegesack 224
BRIST OL 241
BRUG ES 18 8
C AM BR IDG E 22
C ASC INE I)J T AVO LA 246
C HAZELET )4
COALBROOKDALE 26
C OI M BRA 14 0
COMACC H IO 246
CONWA Y C AST LE 36
CORCAPOLO ) 2
C R ETEI L 23 7
D EIZI SAU 121
D ESSAU 2 24
D OLE 2 37
D OREN-A LBERSCHWENDE )1
DRYIlURGH 36,241
DUSSELDORF ) 4
DUISBURG
Expo Bridge 22 4
Katzbuckel Bridge 184
DUMFRI ES 3 6 , 4 7
DURHAM 66
E DZEl. 1. 24 1
EGG )0
ESSI NG 2 2)
ESSLINGEN > M ETTI NG EN
EXETER 241
F ELDKIRCH 2 I 6
FI G EAC 237
FRANKFURT
Holbein Footbridge 2 25
Iron Bridge 225
FRASCO 52
FRAU ENFELD I J2
F REDR I KSTAD 126
FREI BURG 130
FRI BOURG 44
F RoJAc H 1S3
GA ISSAU 1)2
GATESHEAD 18 6
G ATWI CK 242
G EN EVA 44
> LI GNON-LoEX
GIRONA
Iron Bridge 233
Pasarela de Sant Feliu 233
Pont d'en Gomez 0 de la Princesa H, 2 3 3
GIU,\l AGLlO, M AG GI A-TAL 2 10
G LASGOW 36
GRAZ 2 16
GREIFSWALD
Ry ck Bridge 189
Wiecker Bridge 19 3
GROS SENHAIN 134
GRENOBLE 4 0
HAMBURG 22)
H ANO VER
Expo Bridqes 226
Skywalk 226
H ENGSTEY 49
H ERI s Au 24
H ITTI SAU 23,51
Kumma Bridge 159
H ORN CLIFF 242
H OTTON 218
HU NI NGUE 1]6
253
254 Index of Places
I LKLEY 4 6
I N VERCAULD 47
I NVERMARK 198
K ASSEL 32
KEHLH EIM 108
Kzw 24 2
K E\V G ARDEN S 28
KI EL 182
KI N GSTO N-UPO N -HULL 24 2
LADHOLZ 56
LAER /MESCH EDE 38
LA NGEN-BuCH 51
L ANGEN ARGEN 49
L ARRAU 238
LAVE RT EZZO 20
L EER 19 2,2 26
L E HAVRE 238
LIGN ON-Lo EX 74
L I LLE FJ O RD 208
LI NGENAU 50
L LEIDA 234
L OHN E 226
L ONDO N
Bellmouth Passaqe 244
Brids e at th e Royal Victor ia Dock 138
Bridpes t o Babylon 24 3
Floatmq Brids e 244
Huns eiford Bridse 244
Millennium Bridse 10 1, 168
Nell' Te!ford Brids e 24 3
Plashet School Footbri dqe 24 4
Rollins Brids e 19 0
Roy al Ballet School Brids e 154
Science Museum Brids e 156
South Qyay Bridoe 24 3
St Sav iour's Dock Bridge 24 3
LORCA 234
LUCCA > VAGLI 0 1 SOTTO
LUCERN E 219
LYON 44
Passerelle du CollCse 44
Passerelle Saint Georqes 44
Passerell e Saint Vincent 4 4
MAIDSTO N E
Lockmeadow Brids e 24 5
St ress Ribbon Bridse 76
M ADRI D
Brids e over the ,Hanzanares 234
Bndqe over th e M3 0 mot onvay 68
Glorias Cat alano Footbr idqe I 19
MANCH EST ER
Brough t on Bridse 10 0
Merchant s Brids e 136
M AN NH EIM 89
M ELRO SE 36
M ETTI N GEN 120
M EYLAN 238
MIDDLET O N , C U M BR IA 35
MI NDEN 227
M O YLAN D 178
MUNICH
Bridqe in t he Deut sches Museum I 16, I 19
Bridoe t o th e Wiesn s rounds 227
Temporary Bridpe.for Architekt urwoche A1 179
Footbridqe over th e Mi ttle rer RinS 227
MURAU 216
MURCI A 111, 216
N AU DERS 217
NESSENTAL 56
N ICE 200
N IE N BU RG 38
N U REMBE RG 38
OBERHAUSEN-RIPSH ORST 120
O FF EN BACH 54
OVRO NNAZ 220
OSCHATZ 227
OXFORD 2 2
PADUA 24 6
PALEN CI A 234
PARIS
Passerelle Buttes- Chaumont 40
Passerelle Debil ly 26, 238
Passerell e Simone de Beauvoir 144
Passerell e So!ferino 14 2
Pont des Arts 26 , 27
PARIS- L A DEFENSE 239
PASSY 4 2
P EEB LES 36 , 46
P FAFFIKO N > BIRCHERWEID
PFORZHEIM 78
P O NTEVEDRA 235
P ONTRESI NA 220
P OSTBRIDGE, Dartmoor 2 I
P OTSDAM 228
PRAGUE 22 1
P U ENTE LA R EI NA 235
R APPERSWI L 17 2
R ENNES 239
RIJ EK A 170
R IPOLL 164
R O NGELLEN > T R Av ERsI NA T OBEL
R O N N EBURG 228
R OST O CK
Mahlbusen Bridqe 228
Nort h Brids e 79
R OTH 228
SA INT - MAU R ICE 24 0
SA I NTES 54
SALFOR D 245
SA NT C EL O N I 235
SA R R EGUEM I N ES 239
SASSNITZ 15, 114 , 116
S CHAFFHAUSEN 23
S CHNAITTACH 229
SCH WANGA U 229
S I ER R E 9 8
S INGEN AM HOH ENTW IE L 229
SOPIf IEN HOLM 20 4
SRO MOWCE N IZNE 247
ST A USTE LL
ST D ENI S 239
ST FORTUNAT 43
STGALLIN 23
Bridge orer the Sitter 17
Ganggelibrugg 22 o
ST PETERSBURG 40
STA .vIS
STUN 1M K UBEl 24
STOCKTON 245
STRABOURG 240
STlITTGART
Bridge at iV/ax Evt]: Lake 92
Bridge on the University o.fStuttgart 23 0
Cannst atier Footbridge 131
Footbridge i n Rosenstein Park 90
Heilbronner StraJ3e Bridge 230
l.a Feru: Footbridge 23 1
l.owent or Footbridge 230
Praqsaucl Footbridges I and 11 229
Schiller Footbridge 88
STOURH EA D 28
STRENGE N 24,2 17
S ULZ 217
S URANSU NS 80
SW .-\N SEA 110
T AI N 4 3
TA RR STEPS Ex MOOR 12,2 1
TERRASSA 2E
TH US IS
TOULOUS E
l'asserellc des 4
Passcrcllc PSG 240
TouRNo N 4 3
T IUVERSINA TOBEl ., R O N G El LEN
Travcrsincr Footbridge I 122
Traversincr Footbridge II 2 I 2
T 1U'.LON 240
T HI N 2 2 0
VAG LI DI SOTTO 9,60
VAIHI N GEN 62
VALSOJ /Tici no 221
VALS 22 I
V ENI CE
Palazzo Q!1erini Siampaqlia 247
Ponte Ptarrale Roma 247
V ENT 82
VIENNA 39
Erdberger Footbridge 2 18
Zollamt Bridge 2 I 7
f-lackinger Footbridge 218
VRANOV 94
W AIl BlI N G EN
Rems Footbridge I 23 I
Rems Footbridge II 231
W EI LAM R HEIN 176
W EI M AR 38
W EST WYCOMBE 28
W ETT ER 49
WETTINGEN 23
WI ESBAD EN 64
W INCH 34
WI N C H EST ER, AVINGTONPA RK 28
WI N T ERT H U R 124
WINTERTHUR- Wi.iLf LlNGEN 56
WISSEK ERKE 39
W6R LITZ 28
W OLUWI, SAI NT-PIERRE 218
Y VER DO N - l ES- BAI N S 22 1
ZARAGOZA
Bridge overthe inter-city highway 236
Bridge Pavilion at the Expo 15 8 , 236
255
Picture Credits
P: 22, Old Wa lton : archi ve ; Pl' : 2" Grubcnm ann :
Maggi / Navone, 200 3; p. H, fr om left : Faust o Vera ntio ,
Reprint, Muni ch , 19 6 , ; Fischer von Er lach , Entwurf cinc r
histori schcn Archi te kt ur ; Pet er s, 1987; P' )6 and P: 42 left :
Pctcr s, 20 0) ; P: 4 0, St Pet er sburg: Ur sula Baus; P'
Chazc lct: Klaus St iglat, Kar lsruhe ; Offenb ach : Jorg
Rcvmendt , Darmst adt ; Du sseldorf: Stiglat, 19 96 ; Bremen,
Toulouse, Sai ntcs : arch ive; P' Bill, 19 , 5; P: 6,. left :
Dvw idag-Rcport ; P: 6H- 69: Chr ist ina Diaz Moren o, Efrcn
Garc ia Gr inda , Madrid ; P: 71, left ; Rene Walth er : P' 82,
ri ght ; Leonh ardt , 1994; P: 87; Inst. F. Massivbau, TU
Berfin : p. 103: archive; pp. 106-107: Mike Schl aich: P: II I :
Ca rlos Fernandez Casado; p. 116, r ight : Dcu t sc-hcs Museum
Muni ch, phot ographi c service, Beato Harr er ; P: 11 8: Jiirgen
Schmidt ; p. 120 left , P: 121 : Sc- hlaic-hRC'rgermann un d
Par t ner ; PI" 116-127: Gr iff, Fircc-o: rp. 140 -141: Chr ist ian
Richt cr s, Mun ste r; pp . Nick \ Vood, Lond on ; pp .
James Morri s, London; p. Rendering Zaha
Hadi d; P: 16" left; Svcn Wor ner. Stuttgart ; r ight : Fret Ot to,
rinding Form, II. ; PI" 170-171; JU ID, Zag reb; p. 17H: Leo
van del' Klcij ; 1'. 179: Flor ian l iol zhcrr , Muni ch ; P' IH8; Jiirg
Con zett , Chur; P: ,89, ce nt re; Schlaich Bcr gcrmann lind
Partner; P: 19J, Wrecker Bridge : Brigitt e Braun ; PI" 100-
101: Philippe Ruault , Nantes; pp. 204-105: Er ik Reit zel : PI"
206-207: Todd Saunde rs; pp . 208-209: Pushak arkit ckt cr ; PI"
116-147, Graz: HelmutTezak; Naudcrs : Vcrcin Alttinster miinz;
Strengen: Mucha, Alois, Holzbruc-kcn, Wicsbadcn/Bcrlin ,
1995; Vienna, Erdbcr jjcr Foot hridge : Alfred Pauscr: Horton
and Wol uwc Saint -Pier re: [can-Luc Dcru (Daylight); Lucern e:
Kantonal c Denkmalpflepc Luzcrn ; l' ontrcsina: Otto Kunz]r-;
Trin: Walter Bieler; Val Soj: Martin Hugli;Yvcrdon.lcs-Batns:
Beat Widmer: Prag: Jir i St rasky: Bad Homhurg, Hanover, Expo
Bridges, Paris-La Defense: Schleich Ikrgermann uncl Partn er ;
Baden-Baden: Ingenieur gruppe Baucn, Karlsruh e; Berlin ,
Ger icke Footbridge und Gothe nburg Foothridge: Senator fUr
Bau- und \Vohnungswescn t pub.). l:uf3gangcrb riicken in Berl in,
Berlin , 1976; Hohlingcn: Janson +\Volfrum ; Brandenhurg
an del' Havel: Llwc Tiet ze l.andschaftsarchitcktcn: Bremen:
Torstcn Wildc-Schr ot cr; Essing, Potsdam, Ronncbu rp: Richard
J. Dietrich; Hanover, Skywalk: Schullt z + Part ner Architcktcn;
Lehne: Claus Bur )'; Oschat z: Mike Schlaich; Schnaitt ach:
Ingenieur-Ruro LudwigViczr-ns: Singen am Hohcnt wicl:
Michael Palm; Backpack Bridge: Maximilian Riitt iger; Asserts:
Cor tr ight , Br idging the World , 200J; Andoain, Llcida, Tcrrassa:
Pcdelta : Lcrca, Madr-id, Zaragoza: Car los Fernandez Casado ;
Palencia. Pcnt cvcdra : Phccor Ingenieros Consultorcs; Agen:
Gcrr it de Vos; Aubcr-villicr s, Belkgarde-sur -Valscrtnc, Mcylan:
Jacques Mossot (www.s tr uct urac. dcu Crctr -i l: Ger ard Mct ro n
(www.st ructurac.dc}; Dole, Sar rcgucrnincs: Alain Spielmann
Architcct c; Figeac, St Den is, Saint-Maurice, Toulouse;
Mimram Ingenierie; l.arrau: hom c.pl anct .nl/ r- br uit oza :
Lc Havre; Mar -rev, Lcs Pont Modcrn cs, Paris 1995"; Rcnncs:
Marc Malinowskv.Trclon: Gro upe At-cora; Exeter; Clive
Ryall; Gat wick, London , Sout h Quay Bridge : Wilkinson
Eyre Architect s; Kcw: Kcw Gard ens; Kingston-upon -Hull:
Mcl rowell + Benedetti; London, Bridges to Babylon:The Mark
Fisher St udios; London, Plashct Schoo l f oothr idge : Nicholas
Cane; London , Hungerford Bridge: Ian Lamhot ; Stoc kton:
Lifschut z Davidson Sandilands; Cascinc di Tavola: Alessandro
Adilardi; Comacchio: phot ographic archi ves of t he commune of
Comrnacchio; Padua: Lorenzo Attoli co; Tur in: Michel Dcnancc;
Venice, Palazzo Qu erini Stampalia: Christian Hell: Venice, Ponte
Piazzalc Roma:Tobia Zor dan; Amsterdam: Ar up; Sromowcc
Nizne: Pawcl Hawr vszkow
All ot her photographs; Wiifri cd [)c chau, St uttgar t
\\"\\'\\'.wiIfr icd -dech au.de
Authors: Ursula Baus, Mike Schlaich
Phot ographer : Wilfr ied Dcchau et al.
Layout : Moniteurs , Sibylle Schlaich; frei04 publizistik , Ur sula Baus
Translation into English: Chr is Rieser, NewYork ; RtchardToovey, Berlin
English Proofreading: Monica Buckland, Basel
Library of Congress Cont rol Number 200793 1248
Bibliogra phic information published by the Ger man National Libr ar y
The Ger man National Librar y lists this publi cation in the Deut sche Nationalbibliografie;
detailed bibliographic data an.' available on the Int ern et at http. v/ dnb.d-nb.de.
This book is also available in a Ger man language edition ( ISBN 978 -3-76 41-8138-7) .
This 'work is subject to copyright. All right s are reserved, whet her the
whole or part of the material is concer ned, specifically the rights of
tr anslation , reprint ing, re-use of illustrat ions, recitation, broadcast ing,
reprodu ction on microfilms or in other ways, and storage in data bases.
For any kind of use, permi ssion of the copyright owner must be obtained.
2008 Birkhauscr Verlag AG
Basel ' Boston ' Berlin
P. O. Box IB, CH-40 I0 Basel, Switzerland
Par t of Springer Science +Business Media
www.birkhauscr. ch
Print ed on acid-free paper from chlor ine-free pulp. TCP 00
Lithography: Flori an Hoch, Stuttga r t
Printed in Italy
ISBN 978-3-7643 -8139-4
Kindl y suppor ted by
Max Bogi Stahl- & Anlagenbau, Neu markt
Pfeifer Setl- und Hcbetcchnik GmbH, Memmingen
Vallourec & Mann esmann Tubes, Dusseldor f