Accurate Documentation of Sources

A list of references at the end of your document is not enough.

Background:
In engineering, design ideas are always based in someone's earlier work, so
documenting sources is important to put your work in context. It serves two
important purposes:

• proving you have some authority to back up your idea.

• giving appropriate credit to someone else for their ideas.

TWO KEY CONCEPTS

Documentation involves two parts: the Citation and the Reference List.

The Citation is a short code (in the middle of your document) that identifies an
idea or fact as borrowed from somewhere. Whenever you refer to information,
you must identify the source right then and there, so that your reader knows
exactly what information comes from which source.

The Reference List provides the complete information on each source at the end
of the document. This is sometimes called a bibliography, but unlike a formal
bibliography, a reference list includes only works to which you refer.

WHAT THIS SITE OFFERS

This website provides detailed information on the following documentation issues

-- with lots of examples:

• Principles of Documentation: What, When. and Why

• Plagiarism
• Principles of Citation
• Basic Examples
• Working Citations into your Text
• Principles of Referencing
• General Reference Templates
• Sample References

We cover the two most common documentation styles used in Engineering. Select
whichever one is more appropriate to your field:

AUTHOR-DATE STYLE IEEE

 Based on Chicago Manual of Style Standard Numerical Method
Used in Civil, Chemical, Industrial and Used in Electrical, Computer, and
Mechanical Engineering. Mechanical Engineering.

Return to Top

Last modified 08/19/2002 19:10:20 . Site designed and maintained by

Engineering Communication Centre Staff.

Related Sites:
Documentation Introduction | Author-Date Documentation Style | EWC
Bibliography Builder

1.2 IEEE Style Documentation

Before reading on, see this Guide to IEEE Manuscript Preparation (PDF format)

Whenever you refer to information that you took from another source, you must
identify the source right then and there, so that your reader knows exactly what
information comes from which source.

Citation IEEE Documentation comprises two parts: the citation and the
list of references.
• General
Structure The citation is a short code (within the body of the document)
• Specific which identifies an idea or fact the writer has borrowed from
Practices elsewhere. The list of references provides a complete and
detailed list (at the end of the document) of all the sources the
List of writer used. Go to the EWC Bibliography Builder IEEE
References VERSION for a utility that helps you format items for the list
of references.
• Sample
List 1. EWC Bibliography Builder IEEE VERSION for Books
2. EWC Bibliography Builder IEEE VERSION for Book
Articles
 3. EWC Bibliography Builder IEEE VERSION for
Periodical Articles

1.2.1 IEEE Citation - In- text practices

General Structure:
Substitution | Placement | Multiple References | Personal Communication | Other
notes | Direct Quotation | Paraphrase

The major difference between IEEE and other styles is that IEEE style encloses
citation numbers within the text of a paper in square brackets [1] rather than as
superscripts1 or in bracketed form (Jones 98) .
All other bibliographical information regarding the citation is reserved for the list
of references at the end of the document.

According to one technical writing expert, even though IEEE is

the most difficult style to learn, it is still the most valuable style
for aspiring engineers to pick up1.
According to one technical writing expert, even though IEEE is
the most difficult style to learn, it is still the most valuable style
for aspiring engineers to pick up (Jones 98).
According to one technical writing expert, even though IEEE is
the most difficult style to learn, it is still the most valuable style
for aspiring engineers to pick up [1].

1. Author-Name Substitution
IEEE style encourages substituting reference numbers for the name of the author
whenever appropriate. For example,

"As Smith, Wesson, and Williams demonstrate, the natural

course of microprocessor evolution will likely lead to
computers with . . . . "
"As [1], [2], and [3] demonstrate, the natural course of
microprocessor evolution will likely lead to computers with . . .
"
"According to Inose et al, current internet technology is still
years behind industry projections."
"According to [2], current Internet technology is still years
behind industry projections. . . "
2. NOTE: Only implement this strategy when possible: there are occasions in
which the author's name is necessary. When citing a theory commonly attributed
to one person,for example, identifying it with the author's name is often essential
 "To a large degree, quantum mechanics remains dependent
on [1]'s theory of relativity, which states that . . . "
"To a large degree, quantum mechanics remains dependent
on Einstein's theory of relativity, which states that . . . [1]"
3.

4. Citation Note Placement

Place note numbers directly after the reference rather than at the end of a clause or
sentence, unless the reference ends at the end of a clause or sentence. Place all
punctuation outside the square brackets, except commas used to separate multiple
references

"One study examined the mRNA levels of jun C, Jun B, and

Jun D in mouse tissues [2]."
"One study [2] examined the mRNA levels of Jun C, Jun B,
and Jun D in mouse tissues."
"Current Internet technology is still years behind industry
projections, one study suggested [2]."
5. NOTE: Placement of the citation can be important.
6. Example 1:
 ...some photographs [2] are not easily
reproduced.
 This sentence means that it is hard to reproduce the
photographs published by source [2]. The reader will assume that the writer has
actually tried to reproduce these photos.

Example 2:

 Some photographs are not easily

reproduced [2]
This means that source [2] claimed that it is hard to reproduce some
(unspecified) photos. The reader will assume that [2] tried to reproduce the
photos.
7. Multi-reference Citations
When more than one work is involved in the same citation, separate citation
numbers with commas and without any spaces. If a sequence of three of more
citation numbers occurs in the reference, use a single range separated by a
hyphen.

"Though unlikely, the same effects were reported by [2], [7],

[12]."
"Though unlikely, the same effects was reported by [2,7,12].
"Motion or centrifugation can speed up the diagnosis of some
viral infections [19-22] ."
8.
9. Personal Communication and Other "Nonrecoverable" Information
IEEE style manual states that you cite only published works, forthcoming
published works, and unpublished materials available to scholars in a library, a
depository, or an archive. For interviews or other "Non-recoverable" information,
not citation number is necessary. This does not mean that an attempt to identify
the author is unnecessary, but that it needs to be done in the text itself.

Example 1:

 "In a personal interview with Bill

Gates, he suggested that he would soon rule the world."
 This sentence contains information about the origin of the
reference, even without citation. If the sentence were "Bill Gates suggested that
he would soon rule the world," the reader would not know where that information
came from.
2. Content, Biographical, and Additional Bibliographic Notes
In the interests of brevity, IEEE discourages the use of content, biographical, and
additional bibliographic notes.

3. Direct quotation:

Previous studies did not address this issue, however,

because "[t]they neglected any effects of liquid
surface tension and viscosity, so that their results
are applicable only to the initial stages of droplet
impact, when these forces are negligible compared to
their inertial effects [at the time of impact]" [1].

o The above passage is an example of direct quotation. A specific

detail from the book was important enough that the writer reproduced it word-
for-word, and gave the appropriate credit to the original author.
o The writer here uses square brackets to indicate that the original
source differs slightly from this reproduction.
 In order to fit this quotation into the grammar of the main
sentence, the writer has changed the first letter of the original source from
uppercase to lowercase.
 Square brackets signify the addition of clarification
material to the quoted passage.
o If you quote more than three lines from an outside source, you
should indent the quoted material.
o Provide page number from which the quotation is drawn in your
citation in the reference list.

10. Paraphrase:
Single-shot flash photography yields better results
than fast-motion movies [12].
(The above passage is an example of effective paraphrasing)

 What the authors actually wrote was:

 A variety of high-speed ciné film and
short-duration single-shot photographic techniques
have been used to this end (see, for example,
Worthington 1908; Savic & Boult 1955; Watchers &
Westerling 1966; Toda 1974; Akao et al. 1980; Inada et
al. 1983). The method which has yielded the greatest
clarity is single-shot flash photography.

The writer has determined that only the comparison between movies and still
flash pictures is important enough to repeat, and rephrased the original source in
order to emphasize that comparison. Even though the writer does not use the exact
words, the paraphrased detail still comes from Chandra and Avedisian, who
listed six different sources to defend their point. An author who uses Chandra and
Avedisian's statement is ethically obligated to give them credit for the effort they
put into researching it.

o Without proper documentation, the statement would at best

function as mere opinion, and would be of little or no professional value; at worst,
you would be guilty of plagiarism.

1.1.2 IEEE Reference List

The second part of IEEE documentation is a list of references, which should

include a list of all sources used by the writer.

• Title: References (Placed Flush Left)

• Arrangement: Arrange the reference list by the order of citation, not by
alphabetical order.
• Spacing: Double-space both within an between entries
• Indentation: Place the number of the entry at the left margin, enclosed in
square brackets. Indent the text of all entries 2 or 3 spaces to the right of the
closing square bracket.
• Appendices: Each appendix should have its own reference list.

See the IEEE bibliography builder help file for more information about how to
reference:

1. General Help
2. How to Reference Books
3. How to Reference Articles
Sample List of References :

References
[1] D. Jones, Technical Writing Style, Toronto: Allyn and
Bacon, 1998.
[2] H. Inose and J.R. Pierce, Information Technology and
Civilization, New York: Freeman, 1984.
[3] D. Beer, R.F. Martin, and P. Fingle, Photosensory
Transduction, New York: Willey, 1993.
[4] W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum
Theory, C. Eckhart and F.C. Hoyt, Trans., Chicago:
University of Chicago Press,1930.
[5] W. Heisenberg, The Physical Principles of the Quantum
Theory, C. Eckart and F.C. Hoyt, Trans., 2nd.ed., New
York: Dover, 1949.
[6] Council of Biology Editors, Scientific Style and Format:
The CBE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers,
6th ed., Chicago: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[7] An Anonymous Critique of Computer Culture, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1997.
[8] J.L Spudich and B.H. Satir, Eds., Sensory Receptors
and Signal Transduction, New York: Wiley-Liss,1991.
[9] S.A. Selber, Ed. Computers and Technical
Communication: Pedagogical and Programmatic
Perspectives, Greenwich, Connecticut: Ablex, 1997.
[10] R.F. Follet and D. J Walker. "Ground water quality
concerns about nitrogen," in Nitrogen Management and
Ground Water Protection," Ed. R. F. Follet,
Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing Company Inc, 1989,pp.
1-20.
[11] K.A. Nelson, R.J. Dwayne Miller, D.R. Lutz, and M.D.
Fayer, "Optical generation of turntable ultrasonic
waves," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 53, no. 2, Feb.,
pp. 1144-1149.
[12] S. Chandra and C.T. Avedisian, "On the collision of a
droplet with a solid surface," Proc. R. Soc. Lond., vol A
432, pp. 13-41,1991.
[13] T. Land, "Web extension to American Psychological
Association style (WEAPAS)," [Online document], 1996
Mar 31(Rev 1.2.4), [cited 1996 Sept 14], Available
HTTP: http://www.nyu.edu/pages/psychology/WEAPAS

Return to Top

Last modified 08/19/2002 19:09:09 . Site designed and maintained by

Engineering Communication Centre Staff.

Related Sites:
Documentation Introduction | IEEE Documentation Style | EWC Bibliography
Builder

This webpage covers the aspects of citation listed at left below. To move directly
to information on the bibliography (also called references), click on the righthand
column:

• Principles of Citation • Principles of Referencing

• Basic Examples • General Reference Templates

• Working Citations into your Text • Sample References

Principles of Citation

Citations appear in parentheses in one of two places in your text:

• after any fact or phrasing that you have taken from an outside source.
• after the name of an author you are summarizing.

As the name of this style implies, the citation includes NAME and DATE, that is,
the last name of the author, and the date of publication. Sometimes the citation
will also need to include the page number(s) of the original source. So a basic
example looks like this:

(Author 19XX) or (Author 19XX:Page)

Or, to put a real face on it, a book or article by Neil Postman would look like this:

(Postman 1999) or (Postman 1999: 308)

Examples of Common Author-Date Citations

Note: Because the sample citations are hyperlinks to the sample bibliography,
they will appear to be underlined on most browsers. Ordinarily, citations should
not be underlined.
 Work by a Option 1: The name and the date of the source can be enclosed in
Single author parentheses either when the work is first mentioned or after the
information drawn from the source.
One influential study (Tung 1982) raised
the same question.

The results from studies that neglected the

effects of liquid surface tension and
viscosity only apply to the initial stages
of droplet impact,when these forces are
negligible (Tung 1982).

Option 2: When a writer mentions the author's name in the main

part of the sentence, the citation only needs the date.
An influential study by Tung (1982) raised
the same question.
More than When a source has two authors, include both names. You may
one author either spell out the word "and" or use the symbol "&", but be
consistent. If the work has more than two authors, use the name
of the first listed author, followed by "et al." which is an
abbreviation for the Latin phrase "et alias" ("and others").
Because it is Latin, the phrase should be italicized or underlined.
Note only "al." has a period after it.
A similar study endorsed photographic
evidence (Chandra and Avedisian 1991), but
some photographs (Akao et al. 1980) are not
easily reproduced.
Same When an author has written two articles in the same year, you
author(s), differentiate between them with "a" for the first, "b" for the
same year second, and so forth. If your paper refers only to one of these two
articles,you do not need any letters.
Worthington's ground-breaking first study
(1877a)was soon followed by a second
(1877b).
Personal Sometimes your sources will not be published documents. If you
interview use information from a telephone conversation, for example, cite
it just as you would any other source.
One mid-level computer programmer estimated
that she spends 25%- 30% of her time
writing reports and memos for her clients
(Jerz 1996).

Working Citations into your Writing

This section covers ways to use citations, and a caution about the position
of citations in your text. Essentially you can use citations in three ways:

• General Reference
• Paraphrase
• Direct Quotation.

General references, like all of the examples above, refer to the entirety of
a study rather than a specific page or concept. This is the most common
type of reference in technical writing.
Paraphrase typically involves the summary of a single part of another
author's work, for example:

Single-shot flash photography yields better

results than fast-motion movies (Chandra and
Avedisian 1991:15).

Note that the writer has included the page number here because the
information comes from a specific point in the original work. Chandra
and Avedisian's original looked like this:

A variety of high-speed ciné film and short-

duration single-shot photographic techniques
have been used to this end (see, for
example, Worthington 1908; Savic & Boult
1955; Watchers & Westerling 1966; Toda
1974;Akao et al. 1980; Inada et al. 1983).
The method which has yielded the greatest
clarity is single-shot flash photography.

The writer has determined that only the comparison between movies and
stillflash pictures is important enough to repeat, and rephrased to
emphasize that comparison. Even though the writer does not use the exact
words, the paraphrased detail still comes from Chandra and Avedisian,
who listed six different sources to defend their point. An author who
uses Chandra and Avedisian's statement is ethically obligated to give
them credit. Without proper documentation, the statement would at best
function as mere opinion, and would be of little or no professional value;
at worst, it would be plagiarism.

Direct quotation is not used much in technical writing, often only when
one is trying to show how stupid another writer is; however, occasionally,
you might encounter something written so well, you just have to quote it.
Here is a sample below:

Previous studies did not address this issue,

however, because "they neglected any effects
of liquid surface tension and viscosity, so
that their results are applicable only to
the initial stages of droplet impact, when
these forces are negligible compared to
their inertial effects [at the time of
impact]" (Pasandideh-Fard et al. 1996:650).

The writer took a piece of information directly from page 650, reproduced
it word-for-word, and gave appropriate credit to the original authors.
(Square brackets signify the addition of clarification material to the quoted
passage.)

A Word of Warning: Where you place the citation can have significant
impact on meaning. These two examples mean different things, even
thought the words are the same:

Example 1 Example 2

...some photographs (Akao et Some photographs are not

al. 1980) are not easily easily reproduced (Akao et
reproduced. al. 1980).

The left-hand sentence means Akao et al.'s photographs are hard to reproduce, whereas
the sentence on the right means that Akao et al. claimed that some other (unspecified)
photos are hard to reproduce. In the first instance, the reader will assume you tried to
reproduce Akao et al.'s photos, and in the second, the reader will assume that Akao at al.
tried to reproduce photos. So in positioning the citation, make sure it indicates what you
intend.

Next: Principles of Referencing - Making a Bibliography

Return to Top

Last modified 08/19/2002 19:10:11 . Site designed and maintained by

Engineering Communication Centre Staff.
HOW IT WORKS
You can generate a bibliography entry to paste into your word processor. The
bibliography builder gives you a form to fill in. At each step check the Help to be sure
you are entering the data correctly. Then simply press Submit. This feature requires a
browser with JavaScript and frames capability (such as Netscape Navigator 2.01 and
higher, and Internet Explorer 3.0 and higher).

Earlier sections of the Accurate Documentation web collection describe how, when, and
why you should document your work.

WHICH VERSION?
This popular utility is now available in two documentation styles. While nearly every
engineering discipline has its own documentation style, we have tried to provide two
basic and widely useful models. Either will enable you to create an accurate reference
list for books and articles. For other sources see the two parallel "How to Document"
pages.

1.1 Author-Date Style Documentation (Chicago Manual of Style)

Used sometimes in Civil, Mechanical, and Chemical Engineering as well as social

sciences, and humanities.

Take me straight to the Author-Date Style Bibliography Builder

1.2 IEEE Style Documentation (a citation-sequence system)

Used in Electrical and Computer Engineering as well as sometimes in Mechanical and

Chemical Engineering.

Take me straight to the IEEE Bibliography Builder

Last modified 08/19/2002 19:24:48 . Site designed and maintained by

Engineering Communication Centre Staff.

The Problem of Plagiarism

The word "plagiarism" comes from a Latin word meaning "kidnapper," because a
plagiarist is one who makes off with another person's ideas. Whether intentional
or unintentional, it is a breach of professional or academic trust, in which a person
takes credit for someone else's work.
Knowing how to plagiarize is an invaluable skill because it can

• speed up your writing

• eliminate your grammar worries
• get you kicked out of some of the nicest schools in the country.

Seriously, though, if you know how to do it, you know how to avoid it. And you
want to avoid it. The University of Toronto's position on plagiarism is clear. It
looks like this:

The Code of Behavior on Academic Matters (University of Toronto

Governing Council Secretariat, 1991) reads:
It shall be an offence for a student knowingly:

• to represent as one's own any idea or

expression of an idea or work of another in
any academic examination or term test or in
connection with any other form of academic
work, i.e. to commit plagiarism;
• to submit, without the knowledge and
approval of the instructor to whom it is
submitted, any academic work for which
credit has previously been obtained or is
being sought in another course or program
of study in the University or elsewhere;

• to submit any academic work containing a

purported statement of fact or reference to
a source which has been concocted; (B.1.d-
f)

That word "knowingly" doesn't get you out of trouble because the university
understands that as including "should have known." And any student who gets as
far as university, should know. And yes, students do lose their degrees over
plagiarism charges.

So how exactly do you do it? If you are like most students, it's what a priest might
call a "sin of omission," that is, you do it by leaving something out, rather than by
intentionally doing something.

Most often, the problem occurs when you do not include the citation in the
text of your paper. Citation is covered on our Documenting Sources site.
Citation comprises half of how you document your source. It is the half that is
most troubling for students because it raises questions:
• what do I have to cite?
• when do I quote?
• how can I impress the TA or prof with my ideas if I have to keep telling
where I got them?

This last question lies at the heart of plagiarism. None of us wants to look stupid.
The definition of plagiarism in the U of T code suggests how plagiarism makes us
look stupid:

Plagiarism is at once a perversion of originality and

a denial of the interdependence and mutuality which
are at the heart of scholarship itself, and hence of
the academic experience. (Appendix A, 2.p)

Rather than being a pervert, understand this: using sources adds value. It gives
ideas authority; it provides evidence. One of the major problems we see in
Engineering papers is a failure to give evidence. Sources provide evidence. Part
of how we look smart is by using sources correctly. We need to be able to decide
which authors to use, how to work them into our writing, and when we absolutely
have to quote. Also, and more importantly, your prof or TA will be more
impressed by your work if you can synthesize several sources; that means, you
draw conclusions and construct your own idea by putting the source together in a
new or interesting way.

If you're still looking for more on plagiarism, check out the University of Toronto
Advice on Writing site, where you can find the useful document on How Not to
Plagiarize. For a bigger picture see our site on Documenting sources. You might
also be interested in playing around with our Plagiarism Self-Test, a kind of on-
line quiz that helps you understand plagiarism better by looking at examples.

How Not to Plagiarize Documenting sources Plagiarism Self-Test