But Is It Art? Constantin Brancusi vs. the United States Posted by MaryKate Cleary, Collection Specialist, Department of Painting and Sculpture Have you ever puzzled over a work of art that bears little or no resemblance to its title? In 1926, the disparate relationship between an artwork and its textural description led to one of the most significant clashes of art and law in history: the case of Brancusi v. United States. Constantin Brancusi (18761957) was born in Romania, but from 1904 he lived and worked as a sculptor in Paris. He was preoccupied by the theme of the bird, culminating in the sculpture Bird in Space, of which he made 15 versions in marble and bronze and a number of plaster casts. (MoMAs 1928 bronze version is shown at left.) Brancusi sought to convey the essential nature of a bird, elegantly soaring upward in flight, without the need for traditional representational forms. In 1926, Brancusi created a sculpture of Bird in Space (now in the collection of the Seattle Art Museum) and sent it from Paris to New York City for an exhibition of his work at the Brummer Gallery (curated by his great friend and advocate Marcel Duchamp). Although the law permitted artworks, including sculpture, to enter the U.S. free from import taxes, when Bird arrived, Behind the Scenes Collection & Exhibitions Events & Programs Film MoMA PS1 Viewpoints Artists Design Family & Kids MoMA Teen Takeover Tech This Week at MoMA Videos Log In Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API! Constantin Brancusi. Bird in Space. 1928. Bronze, 54 x 8 1/2 x 6 1/2 (137.2 x 21.6 x 16.5 cm). Given anonymously officials refused to let it enter as art. To qualify as sculpture, works had to be reproductions by carving or casting, imitations of natural objects, chiefly the human form (source: Rowell). Because Bird in Space did not look much like a bird at all, officials classified it as a utilitarian object (under Kitchen Utensils and Hospital Supplies) and levied against it 40% of the works value (source: McClean). Bewildered and exasperated by this assessment, Brancusi launched a complaint in court in defense of Bird in Space.
Edward Steichen. Brancusis Bird in Space. 195758. Gelatin silver print, each 10 3/16 x 10 1/4 (25.8 x 26 cm). Gift of the photographer The initial question before the court was whether Brancusis work adequately resembled that which it was supposed to imitate, as indicated by its title. Passing that test would make it a sculpture (and therefore art) and exempt it from customs duties. The task of the trial became, however, how to define sculptureand, for that matter, art. Testimony was provided by a number of experts, including the sculptures owner, Edward Steichen, an artist and future director of MoMAs Department of Photography, as well as British sculptor Jacob Epstein and Brooklyn Museum Director William Henry Fox. During his testimony, the art critic Frank Crowninshield was MOST VIEWED RECENT POSTS FACEBOOK TWITTER FOLLOW US LINKS on Facebook on Twitter on foursquare on YouTube on Flickr on iTunes U via RSS Feed Find more in the Archives Sign Up Create an account or Log In to see what your friends are doing. MoMA | The Collection | Pablo Picasso. Les Demoiselles d'Avignon. Paris, June-July 1907 252 people recommend this. MoMA | Museum of Modern Art 17 people recommend this. MoMA | This May Be the Last Time 140 people recommend this. Facebook social plugin About INSIDE/OUT Privacy Policy Have ideas or feedback? E-mail us at inside_out@moma.org. Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API! A page from America, March 13, 1927 asked by the court what it was about the object which would lead him to believe it was a bird. He responded: It has the suggestion of flight, it suggests grace, aspiration, vigour, coupled with speed in the spirit of strength, potency, beauty, just as a bird does. But just the name, the title, of this work, why, really, it does not mean much (Rowell). Ultimately, the court was persuaded that its definition of what constituted art was out of date. The decision of Judge J. Waite read, In the meanwhile there has been developing a so-called new school of art, whose exponents attempt to portray abstract ideas rather than imitate natural objects. Whether or not we are in sympathy with these newer ideas and the schools which represent them, we think the facts of their existence and their influence upon the art worlds as recognized by the courts must be considered (Rowell). In the 90 years since Constantin Brancusi first conceived Bird in Space, our understanding of what constitutes an artwork, and for that matter, who can occupy the role of artist, has become broader and more inclusive. How do you recognize what is and is not a work of art? Does an artworks title help you interpret an artwork? Is a title necessary to give the artwork meaning? MoMAs version of Bird in Space will be on view in the fifth-floor Painting and Sculpture Galleries beginning Friday, July 25. Tags: MoMA collection, Sculpture, Constantin Brancusi MORE Comments Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API! * required information Name* E-mail address* Your comments* Spam check* Submit JULY 25, 2014, 4:14 P.M. I love this sculpture because it projects elegance, simplicity and I like the way it cuts the atmosphere around it with accuracy and uniqueness. It also projects a sensation of being light like a bird. The color is so fancy and classy; the texture makes it smooth so that it can blend easily in the air just as a bird would do it. Thanks for showing this beautiful artwork. Posted by Marisol Sanmiguel JULY 26, 2014, 1:07 P.M. Very good, concise analysis of the legal issues of this case. I like your writing, Mary! Posted by Nick Connery Leave a Comment
Please enter the text in the image. Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API! 11 WEST 53 STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10019 (212) 708-9400 CONTACT US 2014 THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART PRIVACY POLICY E-News E-Cards Mobile Site Press Visitor Information Choose a language Explore German Expressionism: Works from the Collection Every purchase supports The Museum of Modern Art. Alibis: Sigmar Polke 1963 2010 PopRally Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API! MoMA ABOUT MoMA CALENDAR JOIN BUY TICKETS Does your business need professional PDFs in your application or on your website? Try the PDFmyURL API!