1

1
NASCC 2009- CSD Track
Design of an Industrial Crane
Building Session 5
CSD Presenter:
J im Fisher
2
Design of an
Industrial Crane Building
Session 5
Roof and Wall Design
Standing Seam Roof Considerations
J oist Design
Gravity
Uplift
Ponding
Girt Design (Endwalls and Sidewalls)
Rake Beam Design
Wind Column Design
OMF Lateral Bracing Design
2
3
Review of Design Criteria
4
Project Description
50 ton, top running crane, Class D
Quantity: 1 per aisle
Hook height: 45 ft
Roof type: Standing Seam on J oists
Wall type: R- panel with continuous Zs
Automatic Sprinkler System
3
5
Project Location
City: Sparks
State: Nevada
County: Washoe
Latitude:39.53
Longitude: -119.74
6
Codes and Standards
Building Code: IBC 2006
Minimum Design Loads For Buildings And Other
Structures (ASCE 7-05)
Building Department Contact: J ohn Smith
Date: J uly 6, 2008
Local Ordinances: None
Wind Speed: 90 mph
Wind Exposure: C
4
7
Local Code Requirements
Ground Snow Load: 15 psf
Frost Depth: 24 in.
Seismic Spectral Acceleration:
S
s
=1.476%g
S
1
=0.562%g
8
Loads
ROOF DEAD LOAD
Roofing (SSR) 2.0 psf
Insulation 1.0 psf
Roof Bracing 1.0 psf
J oists 3.0 psf
J oist Girders 3.0 psf
Columns 6.0 psf
MEP Allowance 3.0 psf
Miscellaneous 4.0 psf
Total 23.0 psf
WALL DEAD LOAD 3.0 psf
(Includes Girts)
5
9
Loads
ROOF LIVE LOADS
20.0 psf (reduceable)
SNOW LOADS
Ground Snow Load (P
g
): 15.0 psf
Importance Factor, I =1.0
Terrain Factor: C
Thermal Factor, C
t
: 1.0
Exposure Factor, C
e,
partially exposed: 1.0
Flat Roof Snow Load: P
f
=0.7(P
g
)(I)(C
e
) =10.5 psf <
20 psf, Use 20 psf
Building Category: II
10
Loads
SEISMIC LOADS
Spectral Acceleration, S
s
: 1.476%g
Spectral Acceleration, S
1
: 0.562%g
Occupancy Category: II
Site Class: D
Soil shear wave velocity, v
s
800 ft/sec
Standard penetration resistance, N 15 blows
Soil undrained shear strength, s
u
1500 psf
Importance Factor, I: 1.0
Seismic Design Category: TBD
6
11
Completed Design
OMF
Crane beams
Roof bracing
Sidewall bracing
Endwall bracing
Crane bracing
Various connections
12
Final OMF Design
W30X99
W14X99
W24X146
W36X231
7
13
Roof Bracing
14
Roof and Wall Design
Standing Seam Roofs
Spans
Slope
Diaphragm
Anchorage
Snow drift areas
8
15
Standing Seam Roofs
Advantages
The system is flexible and can accommodate the
building movements associated with the overhead
crane.
The roof can accommodate thermal movements
without slotting the roofing at screw locations. This is
particularly important when placing a metal roof on
open web steel joists. J oist seats are stiff laterally,
unlike cold-formed C or Z purlins, and do not roll as
the roof attempts to expand and contract due to
thermal loading.
16
Standing Seam Roofs
Disadvantages
First cost is greater than conventional roofs.
Limited diaphragm strength and stiffness.
Diaphragm strength cannot be relied upon to
transfer horizontal roof forces to the vertical
load resisting system. Other horizontal
bracing systems must be used.
9
17
Standing Seam Roofs
Spans: 5 ft
Slope: in./ft minimum
Diaphragm: Limited
Anchorage: One end
Snow drift areas: Add
secondary members
18
Joist Design
Gravity Loads
Wind Uplift
Ponding
Bridging
Strut Loads
Seat Depths
10
19
Girt Design
Cold-Formed Girts
Pressure and Suction
Maximum spans
Simple vs continuous span
Sag rods
OSHA requirements
20
Reference Material
11
21
Girt Design
Pressure and Suction Loads from IBC
For pressure, the girts are laterally braced by the
paneling. M
n
=S
e
F
y
=0.9, =1.67
For suction, the strength of the girts is
established using Rvalues from the AISI
Specification. M
n
=RS
e
F
y
=0.9, =1.67
Sag rods are often used when the span exceeds
30 ft.
22
Girt Design- AISI Specification
12
23
Girt Design- AISI Specification
24
Girt Design- AISI Specification
13
25
Girt Design- AISI Specification
26
Calculations
J oists
Girts
Rake Beams
Wind Columns
14
27
See Calculations Pages 5-1 thru 5-12
28
Bracing of Sidewall Columns
AISC 2005 Specification Appendix 6
Stability Bracing for Columns and Beams
No Beam columns
Nodal v. Relative Bracing
Beam Bracing
Nodal
Relative
Torsional
15
29
Relative Brace
A relative column brace system
(such as diagonal bracing or shear
walls) is attached to two locations
along the length of the column that
defines the unbraced length. The
relative brace system shown
consists of the diagonal and the
strut that controls the movement at
one end of the unbraced length, A,
with respect to the other end of the
unbraced length, B.
30
Relative Brace
16
31
Nodal Brace
A nodal brace controls the
movement only at the particular
brace point, without direct
interaction with adjacent braced
points. The two nodal column
braces at C and D that are
attached to the rigid abutment
define the unbraced length for
which K=1.0 can be used.
32
Joist Girder Bracing
Typical girder bracing
for stability and wind
uplift
17
33
Joist Girder Bracing
Typical girder bracing at plastic hinge locations
34
See Calculations Pages 5-13 thru 5-16
18
35
End of Session 5