Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Prepared By:
Abdullah A. Al Beladi
Internship Engineer
Contract Number:
Dresser-Rand Job Number: 000000
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
2 PD&C RISK MATRIX AND RISK ASSESSMENT 4
3 SUMMARY OF CURRENTLY OPEN ISSUES 5
4 SUMMARY OF ISSUES 6
4.1 Turbine Generator Set. 6
5 ISSUE DETAILS 7
5.1 Turbine Generator Set. 7
9
6 PERFORMANCE SUMMARY - FOR CURRENT REPORTING MONTH 12
6.1 Plant Overall Performance 12
6.2 Steam Turbine Performance 13
6.3 Waste Heat Boiler Performance 14
A. APPENDIX - PD&C OVERVIEW 15
B. APPENDIX – RESOLVED ISSUES 16
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report covers the findings of October/November 2009 for New Haven Turbine Generator, the Energy
Recovery Plan Unit.
In general the unit running in a good condition with low risk issues need to be resolved. All the issues
were discussed in details.
The report discusses the overall plant performance, in addition to the machine performance such as
steam turbine and waste heat boiler.
Issues are categorized according to the PD&C Risk Matrix, presented below. An issue is assessed for
probability of failure and for consequences of that failure to determine the risk level – low, medium or
high. The risk level then points to the appropriate response priority for that issue.
The PD&C analysis process identifies anomalies in machinery performance, machinery condition,
controls and/or data problems. Any such finding is called an “issue”. As time goes on it is very important
to track issues in order to ensure that they do not get dropped and also to provide feedback to the PD&C
analysis team.
A history of issues that have been resolved is kept by the PD&C team. In time, this history along with
statistics on issues found constitutes useful information for reliability purposes.
STATUS
NEW Risk Level
DATE 1 2 3 TOTAL
Oct-09 0 0 4 4
Nov-09 0 0 1 1
4.5
4
3.5
Number of Issues
3 RL 1
2.5 RL 2
2 RL 3
1.5
1
0.5
0
Oct-09 Nov-09
Month
4 SUMMARY OF ISSUES
5 ISSUE DETAILS
250
240
220
200 200
180
160
150
140
120
100 100
80
60
50
40
20
0 0
09.10.16 09.10.23 09.10.30 09.11.06 09.11.13
Log Date
OPERATING HOURS: 1032.6 DATE: 2009.11.13 TIME: 15:00 SEQUENCE: 0
TE-214A Gen Temp (deg F) = 1 TE-214B Gen Temp (deg F) = 1
TE-214C Gen Temp (deg F) = 141 TE-214D Gen Temp (deg F) = 128
TE-214E Gen Temp (deg F) = 126 TE-214F Gen Temp (deg F) = 129
250
240
220
200 200
180
160
150
140
120
100 100
80
60
50
40
20
0 0
09.10.16 09.10.23 09.10.30 09.11.06 09.11.13
Log Date
OPERATING HOURS: 1032.6 DATE: 2009.11.13 TIME: 15:00 SEQUENCE: 0
TE-214A Gen Temp (deg F) = 1 TE-214B Gen Temp (deg F) = 1
TE-214C Gen Temp (deg F) = 141 TE-214D Gen Temp (deg F) = 128
TE-214E Gen Temp (deg F) = 126 TE-214F Gen Temp (deg F) = 129
280
260
250
240
220
200 200
180
160
150
140
120
100 100
80
60
50
40
20
0 0
09.10.16 09.10.23 09.10.30 09.11.06 09.11.13
Log Date
OPERATING HOURS: 559.6 DATE: 2009.10.24 TIME: 22:00 SEQUENCE: 0
TE-212 Brg Temp.DE (deg F) = 81 TE-213 Brg Temp. NDE (deg F) = 87
0.8 0.8
0.7
0.6 0.6
0.5
0.4 0.4
0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1
0.0 0.0
09.10.16 09.10.23 09.10.30 09.11.06 09.11.13
Log Date
OPERATING HOURS: 518.6 DATE: 2009.10.23 TIME: 5:00 SEQUENCE: 0
VE-303 Gen Brg Vib. (mils) = 0.03 VE-304 Gen Brg Vib. (mils) = 0.06
Probability: Low
Consequences: low
Risk Level: (3) Low
180
170
160
150 150
140
130
120
110
100 100
90
80
New Haven TG Set: Energy Recovery Plan: Feed Rate(Ton/Day) Vs Power (KW)
800
PARAMETER INFORMATION
Feed Rate: Ton/Day
No Data
700
PW-100 Gen Power Out: kW
0
600
PW-100 Gen Power Out
CURSOR INFORMATION
Operating Hours: 1032.60
500 Date: 2009.11.13
Time: 15:00
400 Sequence Number: 0
ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS
300
200
100
0
20 30 40 50 60
Feed Rate
New Haven TG Set: Energy Recovery Plan: Steam Flow(lb/hr) Vs Power (KW)
800
PARAMETER INFORMATION
FI-110 Steam Flow: lb/hr
7676.00
700
PW-100 Gen Power Out: kW
494.00
600
PW-100 Gen Power Out
CURSOR INFORMATION
Operating Hours: 852.60
*
500 Date: 2009.11.06
Time: 3:00
400 Sequence Number: 0
line
ase ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS
pb
rt u
300 Sta
200
100
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
FI-110 Steam Flow
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
11/1
11/2
11/3
11/4
11/5
11/6
11/7
11/8
11/9
10/14
10/16
10/21
10/23
10/30
10/15
10/17
10/18
10/19
10/20
10/22
10/24
10/25
10/26
10/27
10/28
10/29
10/31
11/10
11/11
11/12
11/13
11/14
11/15
Date
Output Parameter:
800
8.44E6
ADDITIONAL PARAMETERS
400
300
200
100
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000
Heat Input Parameter
• PD&C Description
Dresser-Rand’s field engineers and/or Customer X personnel capture data from each module
on a weekly basis. There is usually a compromise; the available data are generally fewer than
the optima. As a result, some operating characteristics and/or failure modes cannot be tracked
or predicted. These data are logged using log sheets, vibration scanners, unit control panels,
and other databases or spreadsheets. The data are sent to Dresser-Rand via email to
drpdc@dresser-rand.com. The Dresser-Rand Technical Support team reviews the data on a
weekly basis and will immediately contact Customer X with any major concerns. D-R takes the
weekly data and compiles them into monthly, more in-depth reports. Dresser-Rand Technical
Support will coordinate a monthly review meeting and conference call with Customer X, once
the report has been issued. This monthly report will be available in hard copy as well as pdf.
This aspect of the PD&C monitoring program is based on operating data from the control
system. The data sets are comprised of process pressures, temperatures, flow rates, machine
speeds, component temperatures (e.g. bearings), lube oil pressures and temperatures and any
other available parameter useful for condition or performance analysis.
The Dresser-Rand PD&C process evaluates these raw data inputs for trends and compares
them to allowable levels. Then various condition and performance indicators are developed
through relevant calculations. Such indicators are linked to specific performance measures,
such as a degradation of efficiency, or to certain mechanical faults, such as a bearing failure.
• Vibration Surveys
Monthly vibration analyses are performed to provide more information on the mechanical
condition of each unit. Various kinds of vibration data are collected at pre-selected points;
mostly at bearings, with readings collected in horizontal, vertical and axial directions. The
analysis tools produce detailed, high resolution spectra or signatures of the vibration at each
point.
With the assistance of the analyzer system, a rotating machinery engineer interprets these
signatures. The process involves:
- evaluating the overall or total level of vibration
- looking for energy at frequencies where specific faults will appear if present in the
machine
- evaluating the level of energy at these “fault frequencies”
- looking for trends or changes in the overall and fault frequency levels
- making a judgment call on the severity and risk associated with any anomalies detected
All of the previously resolved issues, not resolved during this reporting period, dating back to
the beginning of this PD&C contract are included in this section. To obtain any other
information regarding these past issues, please contact Dresser-Rand technical support at
drpdc@dresser-rand.com