0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
165 просмотров1 страница
The stability graph method is widely used in Canadian underground hard rock mines as a basis for open stope support design. This technical note proposes a new rock stress factor, A, which will reflect the impact of low confinement on critical face stability. Low compressive and tensile stresses in the critical face are common along the hanging-wall and footwall of relatively tall stopes created when mining using VRM, longhole open-stoping, and other similar methods.
The stability graph method is widely used in Canadian underground hard rock mines as a basis for open stope support design. This technical note proposes a new rock stress factor, A, which will reflect the impact of low confinement on critical face stability. Low compressive and tensile stresses in the critical face are common along the hanging-wall and footwall of relatively tall stopes created when mining using VRM, longhole open-stoping, and other similar methods.
The stability graph method is widely used in Canadian underground hard rock mines as a basis for open stope support design. This technical note proposes a new rock stress factor, A, which will reflect the impact of low confinement on critical face stability. Low compressive and tensile stresses in the critical face are common along the hanging-wall and footwall of relatively tall stopes created when mining using VRM, longhole open-stoping, and other similar methods.
New rock stress factor for the stability graph method
Hani S. Mitri a,n , Rory Hughes a , Yaohua Zhang b a Department of Mining and Materials Engineering, McGill University, 3450 University Street, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 2A7 b AMEC Americas Limited, Natural Resources/Oil Sands & Mining, 2020 Winston Park Drive, Suite 700, Oakville, Ontario, Canada L6H 6X7 a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: Received 16 October 2009 Received in revised form 1 September 2010 Accepted 10 September 2010 Available online 20 November 2010 1. Introduction The stability graph method is widely used in Canadian under- ground hard rock mines as a basis for open stope support design andis frequently used inthe mine planning phase as a tool to assess the viability of stope geometries and to determine maximum permissible spans. This method is well accepted due to its simplicity and suitability to a wide range of hard rock mining methods, requiring the use of sub-levels to access and extract the mining blocks. Based on the work of Mathews et al. [1], Potvin [2] revised the stability graph method using case studies from Canadian underground mines. Nickson [3] added further case studies and extended the method to address cablebolt support requirements in hard rock mining methods. Whereas the stability graph method is reliable in situations where the maximum induced tangential stress creates adequate compressive stress keeping the face in a state of connement, the method fails to reect the effect of low connement caused by lower compressive stresses and instances where tensile stresses are developed. These low compressive and tensile stresses in the critical face are common along the hanging-wall and footwall of relatively tall stopes created when mining using VRM, longhole open-stoping, AVOCA, and other similar methods. This technical note proposes a new rock stress factor, A, which will reect the impact of low connement on critical face stability. 2. Stability graph method This method uses the hydraulic radius of the critical face andthe modied stability number, N 0 , proposed by Potvin [2], to estimate the stability of unsupported andsupported underground openings; see Figs. 1 and 2, respectively. The hydraulic radius, HR, can be represented by the following equation: HR Length Width 2 Length2 Width 1 The modied stability number, N 0 , presentedby Potvin[2], is the product of four factors Nu Qu A B C 2 where Q 0 is an indication of rock mass quality, A incorporates the effects of induced stress, B accounts for the weakness due to the direction of the dominant joint system, and C takes into account the orientation of the critical face and the impact of gravity upon it. The value of Q 0 is based on the rock tunnelling index, Q, introduced by Barton et al. [4] as Qu RQD Jn Jr Ja Jw SRF 3 In the above equation, RQDis the rock quality designation, J n the joint set number, J r the joint roughness number, J a the joint alteration number, J w the joint water reduction factor, and SRF the stress reduction factor. The modied rock tunnelling index, Q 0 , sets the values of J w and SRF both equal to 1, which results in the following equation provided by Potvin [2]: Qu RQD JN JR J A 4 In effect, the parameters J w and SRF representing the effects of active stress on stability are replaced by the rock stress factor, A, withinthe modiedstability number, N 0 . The rockstress factor, A, in Eq. (2) has a value between 0.1 and 1 and is based on the ratio of the uniaxial compressive strength of the intact rock to the maximum induced tangential stress acting at the center of the critical face: Ratio UCS s 1Max 5 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijrmms International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 1365-1609/$ - see front matter & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.09.015 n Corresponding author. Tel.: +1 514 398 4890; fax: +1 514 398 7396. E-mail addresses: hani.mitri@mcgill.ca (H.S. Mitri), rory.hughes@mail.mcgill.ca (R. Hughes), benny.zhang@amec.com (Y. Zhang). International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences 48 (2011) 141145
STABILTY ASSESSMENT OF HEADRACE TUNNEL SYSTEM FOR PUNATSANGCHHU II HYDROPOWER PROJECT, BHUTAN - Estimation of Seepage and Water Leakage in Underground Tunnels