What Is Energy Contracting - Task16 Discussion Paper Rev.3 - 131014

IEA DSM Task 16:
What is Energy-Contracting
(ESCo or Energy Efficiency Services)?
Concept, Definition and
Two Basic Business Models

Discussion Paper (Rev. 3)

Graz, October 2013
Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org

IEA DSM Task 16: What is Energy-Contracting?
Synopsis and Authors

Jan W. Bleyl - Energetic Solutions + Authors. For requests: EnergeticSolutions@email.de 2/18
Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
Synopsis and Authors
This report was developed within Task 16 Competitive Energy Services (Energy-
Contracting, ESCo Services) of the IEAs Demand Side Management Implementing
Agreement.
International Energy Agency
IA Demand Side Management (DSM)
Task 16 Competitive Energy Services
http://www.ieadsm.org

When citing from this document, please refer to it as follows:
Bleyl, Jan W. What is Energy-Contracting (ESCo or Energy Efficiency Services)? Con-
cept, Definition and Two Basic Business Models IEA DSM Task 16 discussion paper
Rev. 3, October 2013. Download available from www.ieadsm.org => Task 16

Authors:
DDI Jan W. Bleyl-Androschin
IEA DSM Task 16 Competitive Energy Services Operating Agent
c/o: Jan W. Bleyl - Energetic Solutions
A-8020 Graz, Lendkai 29, Austria or
D-76344 Leopoldshafen Frankfurterstr. 12, Germany
Tel.: +43-650 7992820
Fax: +43-316-811848-9
Email: EnergeticSolutions@email.de
With contributions from Task 16 national experts
(contact details on back cover).
IEA DSM Task 16 - Phase III builds on work, which was
previously led by Graz Energy Agency. Thank you GEA!
Energetic
Solutions
Jan W. Bleyl
Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org

Financing partners

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
Financing partners

Austria (until 06/2012)
Federal Ministry of Transport,
Innovation and Technology
www.bmvit.gv.at
www.energytech.at
Belgium
Federal Public Service
Economy, S.M.E.s, Self-Employed and Energy
DG Energy External relations
http://economie.fgov.be/
Finland (until 06/2009)
Tekes the Finnish Funding Agency for
Technology and Innovation
www.tekes.fi
India (until 06/2012)
Bureau of Energy Efficiency
Ministry of Power
www.bee-india.nic.in
Japan (until 06/2009)
Tokyo Electric Power Company
www.tepco.co.jp/en/index-e.html
Korea (since 07/2012)
Korea Energy Management Coorperation
www.kemco.or.kr
Netherlands
Agentschap NL Ministerie van Economische Zaken
www.agentschapnl.nl
Spain (since 07/2009)
Red Elctrica de Espaa
www.ree.es
Sweden (since 07/2012)
Swedish Energy Agency:
www.swedishenergyagency.se
Switzerland (since 07/2012)
Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE
www.bfe.admin.ch/

The project partners wish to explicitly thank the IEA DSM ExCo members of the
participating countries and their financing partners for their support.

IEA DSM Task 16: What is Energy Contracting (ESCo Services)?
Table of content, figures and tables

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
Table of content, figures and tables

Content
1 Motivation ......................................................................... 5
2 Energy-Contracting (ESCo or Energy Efficiency
Services) ........................................................................... 7
2.1 Differentiation and Definition of Energy Services Providers
and their Services ................................................................... 7
2.2 Definition and Concept of performance based EC ........................ 9
2.3 Two Basic Business Models .................................................... 11
2.4 Modular Scope of Services ..................................................... 12

List of Figures
Figure 1: What is Energy-Contracting? An integrated energy
efficiency service with outsourcing of risk, interfaces
and guarantees to an ESCo ................................................ 5
Figure 2: Energy service value chain, business models, typical
products and measures ................................................... 10
Figure 3: Scope of services of two basic ESCo models ........................ 11
Figure 4: Energy-Contracting: A modular energy service package
with guaranteed outcome for the client ............................. 12

List of Tables
Table 1 Differentiation of categories of energy service providers,
their services and remuneration ......................................... 8

Motivation

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
1 Motivation
"We will leave a steam engine free of charge to you. We will install these
and will take over for five years the customer service. We guarantee you
that the coal for the machine costs less, than you must spend at present at
fodder (energy) on the horses, which do the same work. And everything
that we require of you, is that you give us a third of the money, which you
save." [James Watt, 1736-1819]
The concept of Energy Performance Contracting was born early in the indus-
trial revolution. While motivation may have changed over time the search
for suitable business models for the implementation of innovative technolo-
gies is ongoing.
One of the most important and at the same time most difficult energy policy
and energy economics tasks continues to be the search for suitable delivery
mechanisms for energy saving potentials. The level of success is far from
satisfactory as the continuous increase in final energy consumption reveals.
Since the mid of this decade, Energy Services (ES) have climbed high on
political agendas and have even reached the headline of energy efficiency
legislation [2006/32/EC].
Technology
Suppliers, construction,
operation & maintenance
Energy Carriers
Gas, fuel oil,
solar, woodchips
Finance
TPF, equity, banks,
leasing, subsidies ...
Know-How
Managers, consultants,
engineers, architects,
E
n
e
r
g
y

S
e
r
v
i
c
e

C
o
m
p
a
n
y

(
E
S
C
o
)
Supply (MWh) or
savings (NWh)
incl. function,
performance +
price guarantees
Legislative Framework
Procurement, laws,
norms, technical rules
ESCo
Client
Source: after [Bleyl 2009]

Figure 1: What is Energy-Contracting? An integrated energy efficiency
service with outsourcing of risk, interfaces and guarantees to an
ESCo
Energy-Contracting (EC) is cited many times as a smart multi-purpose-
instrument, which will help to overcome market barriers for Energy Efficien-
cy (EE). While a number of obstacles can be overcome with the EC concept,

Motivation

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
the pros and cons, the realistic potentials, the limits and added values of
ESCo products in comparison to in-house implementation need further clari-
fication.
Most existing EC definitions
1
fall short with regard to important properties of
real EC projects such as outsourcing of risks to the ESCo, guarantees
for outcome and all inclusive cost of the measures implemented,
modularity of the service package or optimization according to pro-
ject cycle cost. These features constitute important quality attributes of
real ESCo products as opposed to simple energy services. And they may
constitute an added value compared to standard in-house implemen-
tation models.
Also the two basic business models either delivery of useful energy (En-
ergy Supply Contracting - ESC) or energy savings (Energy Performance
Contracting - EPC) and their implications are not distinguished well enough.
The goal of this discussion paper is to
develop a common understanding of the key features of real Ener-
gy-Contracting projects (c.f. definition in chapter 2.1),
increase understanding of Energy-Contracting as a tool and delivery
mechanism for implementation of energy efficiency: Pros and cons,
potentials, limits and added values of ESCo products in comparison to
in-house implementation,
differentiate between the two basic EC business models ESC and EPC,
which are both performance based,
contribute to common definition and standardization efforts.
We focus on some key features here, assuming that the reader has a basic
knowledge of the Energy-Contracting (EC, also labeled as ESCo- or Energy
Efficiency Service) concept
2
and building energy efficiency.
Given the complexity of the EC concept this has to be considered as work
in progress. Feed back, questions and further cooperation are highly wel-
come. Please contact the authors attention to Jan W. Bleyl (contact details
on page 2).

1
cf. [2006/32/EC], [Bertholdi et.al. 2007], [EN 15900], [DIN 8930-5], [GEFMA 540], [Satchwell et.al.
2010], [UZ 50], [VDMA 24198] this list is not exhaustive
2
For further basics on Energy-Contracting you may refer to e.g. www.contracting-portal.at,
[SenStad+BE 2002], [dena 2004], [Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008 u. 2008a], [dena 2009], [Eikmeier et.al.
2009] (this list is not exhaustive).

Differentiation and Definition of Energy Services Providers and their Services

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
2 Energy-Contracting (ESCo or Energy Effi-
ciency Services)
2.1 Differentiation and Definition of Energy Services
Providers and their Services
In the ESCo industry but also in the respective literature, a wide variety of
definitions are used, which reflect the different interests of the broad spec-
trum of stakeholders involved. However, for clarification and structuring
purposes it is helpful to classify different groups of service providers respec-
tively their services, distribution of project risks and remuneration schemes.
We propose to distinguish between three main groups of service providers
(without any intention to value them):
1. Consultancy (service) providers such as energy auditors, planning en-
gineers, CMVPs, accountants, lawyers and others who basically provide
advice. The consultants risks are typically limited to his professional in-
demnity insurance, while the project performance risk remains with the
client. Payments for consultancy-type services are commonly agreed
based on their inputs (hourly rates or lump sum); sometimes consult-
ants will also have a performance based component (share of savings
achieved) in their remuneration.
2. Technology suppliers of energy efficiency hardware (e.g. efficiency
technologies like re-lighting, CHP and solar components or systems) or
software (e.g. for energy accounting or management) and their re-
lated operation and maintenance services (e.g. servicing of burners,
technology maintenance services or software updates). They all supply
individual components for projects and are paid for the supply of these
components, but typically not their performance or outputs. The suppli-
ers risks are typically limited to product warranties and vendor liabilities,
but the project performance risk remains with the client.
3. ESCos who provide performance based Energy-Contracting (also
labeled as ESCo - or Energy Efficiency Services). The two basic busi-
ness models are: Energy Supply Contracting (ESC), which delivers units
useful energy measured in MWh and Energy Performance Contracting
(EPC), which provides energy savings, measured in comparison to a ex-
ante energy cost baseline. For both models, the ESCos remuneration
depends on the respective outputs of the services provided and not the
inputs (like fuels or person-hours) consumed, thus introducing an intrin-
sic interest for the ESCo to increase efficiency of the technologies de-
ployed and to reduce final-energy demand and related emissions.

Differentiation and Definition of Energy Services Providers and their Services

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
The key characteristics of the different service provider groups are summa-
rized in the following table:
Table 1 Differentiation of categories of energy service providers, their ser-
vices and remuneration
Energy
service
provider
categories Example services
Who bears
project per-
formance
risks?
Remu-
neration
scheme
1. Consultants - Audits by auditors
- HVAC planning by
engineers
- M&V plans by CMVPs
- Facilitaton by con-
sultants, EAs
- Legal advice by law-
yers
- Book keeping by ac-
countants
with client.
Consultant
risks limited
to profes-
sional in-
demnity in-
surance
Based on
input,
e.g.
hourly
rates or
lump
sum
2. Technology
suppliers +
related ser-
vices (mostly
technical)
- OEMs, technology
providers,
e.g. for HVAC, solar-,
CHP
systems or building
insulation
- EPCs, construction
companies
- software tools
with client.
Supplier risk
limited to
product war-
ranties, ven-
dors liabili-
ties
Based on
input,
e.g. price
of tech-
nologies
and ser-
vices
3. Real per-
formance
based ESCos
Performance based
services, e.g.
- Energy Supply Con-
tracting (ESC)
- Energy Performance
Contracting (EPC)
Technical
and eco-
nomical
perfor-
mance risk
with ESCo
Based on
output,
e.g. MWh
or sav-
ings
(NWh)
delivered
All three groups of service providers are needed to develop an ESCo indus-
try. At the same time their role in the value added chain and scope of ser-
vice, their degrees of risk acceptance as well as their business models and
remuneration schemes are notably different. By distinguishing between the-
se groups of service providers, the analysis and recommendations can be
targeted much better.

Definition and Concept of performance based EC

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
In many studies and statistics these groups are mingled, which may lead to
rather unspecific findings and recommendations. Also in terms of reporting,
e.g. in NEEAPs or ESCo registers, the numbers are not very meaningful, if
not distinguished between the groups of service providers proposed above.
Otherwise there is a risk to have high numbers of so-called ESCos regis-
tered, which do not correspond at all to the number of EPC projects imple-
mented or the number of offers a RFP for an ESCo project will induce.
The different categories of services also reflect clients different preferences
weather to buy individual components of an EE project (e.g. separate plan-
ning, construction, maintenance contracts) or to outsource a comprehensive
package to one service provider.
And last but not least this differentiation allows to delimit real, perfor-
mance based services, which includes assumption of technical and economi-
cal risks by an ESCo against standard, non-performance based services.
2.2 Definition and Concept of performance based EC
Most existing definitions fall short with regard to important properties of
real Energy-Contracting (EC) services such as outsourcing of commercial
and technical risks to the ESCo, guarantees for results and all inclusive
cost of the measures implemented or optimization according to project cycle
cost (cf. [2006/32/EC], [Bertholdi et.al. 2007], [EN 15900], [DIN 8930-5],
[GEFMA 540], [Satchwell et.al. 2010], [UZ 50], [VDMA 24198] this list is
not exhaustive). These features may constitute an added value in compari-
son to standard in-house implementation.
Therefore, in a narrow sense we define EC as:
Energy-Contracting - also labeled as ESCo- or Energy Service - is
a comprehensive energy service concept for executing energy ef-
ficiency and renewable projects in buildings or production facilities
according to minimized project cycle cost.
An Energy Service Company (ESCo) typically acts as a general con-
tractor and implements a customized efficiency service package
(consisting of e.g. design, building, (co-)financing, operation &
maintenance, optimization, fuel purchase, user motivation).
As key features, the ESCos remuneration is performance based, it
bears the commercial as well as the technical implementation and
operation risks and guarantees the outcome and all inclusive
cost of the services for the duration of the project
(after [Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008])
The EC service concept shifts the focus away from selling units of final en-
ergy (like fuel oil, gas or electricity) towards the desired benefits and ser-
vices derived from the use of the energy carrier (e.g. the lowest cost of
keeping a room warm, air-conditioned or lit). In other words: The ESCos
remuneration depends on the output of the services provided and not the

Definition and Concept of performance based EC

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
inputs (like fuels or manhours) consumed, thus inducing an intrinsic interest
for the ESCo to increase efficiency and to reduce final energy demand.
EC services are not about any particular technology or energy carrier. In-
stead EC is a flexible and modular efficiency tool to execute energy effi-
ciency projects, according to the goals of the facility owner. It is an instru-
ment to minimize life- or project cycle cost, including the operation phase of
the building.
Typically the ESCo serves as a general contractor and is responsible for co-
ordination and management of the individual components and interfaces of
the service package towards the customer. It has to deliver the commis-
sioned energy service (Megawatthours of useful energy or energy savings
(Negawatthours)) to the customer at all inclusive prices as displayed in
Figure 1:.
Figure 2: illustrates and energy added value chain from primary to useful
energy and energy saving services.
ENERGY
PERFORMANCE
CONTRACTING
(EPC)
=> NWh
e.g. climatized rooms:
Energy management,
controls, HVAC,
efficient lighting,
peak load management,
thermal insulation,
user motivaton
Energy savings
service
ENERGY
SUPPLY
CONTRACTING
(ESC)
=> MWh
Heat, steam, cooling,
compressed air ,
CHP plants,
Renewables, e.g.
solar systems ...
+ EE-measures?
Useful energy
service
Standard
ENERGY
SUPPLIER
(UTILITY)
Secondary/
final energy
Primary
energy
Heating oil,
electricity,
district heating,
biomass,
Crude oil,
natural gas,
coal,
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s

m
o
d
e
l
s
T
y
p
i
c
a
l

p
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
&

m
e
a
s
u
r
e
s
V
a
l
u
e

c
h
a
i
n
e
Source: after [Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008]

Figure 2: Energy service value chain, business models, typical products
and measures
ESCo products provide either useful energy (Energy Supply Contracting -
ESC) or energy savings (Energy Performance Contracting - EPC) to the end
user. And they achieve environmental benefits due to the associated energy
and emission savings as well as non-energetic benefits such as increase in
comfort or image gains.
The two business models are described in the next chapter.

Two Basic Business Models

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
2.3 Two Basic Business Models
The two basic ESCo business models can be distinguished, cf. Figure 3:.
They provide either useful energy (Energy Supply Contracting - ESC) or en-
ergy savings (Energy Performance Contracting - EPC) as outputs to the end
user. Both business models are performance based and result in a reduction
of final energy demand. And they achieve environmental benefits due to the
associated energy and emission savings as well as non-energetic benefits
such as increase in comfort or image gains. Two basic business models
1. At Energy Supply Contracting (ESC) efficient supply of useful ener-
gy such as heat, steam or compressed air is contracted and measured
in Megawatt hours (MWh) delivered. The business model usually in-
cludes purchasing of fuels and is comparable to district heating or co-
generation supply contracts. The scope of energy end-use efficiency
measures is usually limited to the energy supply side of the building
or enterprise, e.g. the boiler room. It can also be applied to energy
supply from renewable sources, e.g. solar ESC.
2. As for Energy Performance Contracting (EPC), the focus is on re-
ducing final energy consumption through demand side energy effi-
ciency measures. The scope is extended to the entire building or en-
terprise including measures such as technical building equipment, us-
er behavior or the building envelope insulation as indicated in Figure
3:. The business model is based on delivering savings compared to a
predefined baseline, also labeled as Negawatt hours (NWh).
Figure 3: illustrates a typical scope of services of the above mentioned En-
ergy-Contracting models.
Source: after [Bleyl 2008]
Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel
Energy Energy Energy Energy Supply Supply Supply Supply
Contracting Contracting Contracting Contracting (ESC)
=> M => M => M => MWh
Meter
Boiler
Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel Fuel
=> M => M => M => MWh
Meter
Boiler
=> M => M => M => MWh
=> M => M => M => MWh
Meter Meter
Boiler Boiler
Solar Solar Solar Solar Supply Supply Supply Supply- -- -Contracting Contracting Contracting Contracting
(Solar ESC) => M => M => M => MWh
Solar
Solar Solar Solar Solar Supply Supply Supply Supply- -- -Contracting Contracting Contracting Contracting
(Solar ESC) => M => M => M => MWh
Solar
Energy Performance Energy Performance Energy Performance Energy Performance
Contracting Contracting Contracting Contracting (EPC)
=> N => N => N => NWh
Energy Performance Energy Performance Energy Performance Energy Performance
Contracting Contracting Contracting Contracting (EPC)
=> N => N => N => NWh

Figure 3: Scope of services of two basic ESCo models
Most ESCo products are based on either one of the above business models.

Modular Scope of Services

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
2.4 Modular Scope of Services
Most energy efficiency projects differ in their contents and general condi-
tions. Therefore, it has proved to be necessary and sensible to adapt the
scope of services specifically to the individual project. This also means the
building owner can depending on his own resources define what compo-
nents of the energy service will be outsourced and which components he or
she carries out in-house (e.g. financing or ongoing on-site maintenance
provided by a caretaker).
The necessary components for implementing energy (efficiency) projects
are summarized in an energy service package with result guarantees given
to the client as displayed in Figure 4:
(Co-)Financing, Subsidies
Operat. &mainten.,
Troubleshooting,
Optimization,
User mvation
Project development,
Rough planning
Detailed planning,
Construction,
Commissioning
Energy-
Contracting
- a modular service
package incl.
outcome
guarantees
Outsourcing of
commercial
and technical risks
Function-,
performance- and
price guarantees
Added value
through
outsourcing:
=> Energy-Contracting is the guarantee, that the overall system
performs to specifications. Over the whole contract term.
Fuel + power purchase
Source: after [Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008]
M & V,
Quality assurance,
Controlling

Figure 4: Energy-Contracting: A modular energy service package with guar-
anteed outcome for the client
All the tasks shown in the figure, such as planning, construction and financ-
ing, as well as all the ongoing components of the service, such as operation
and maintenance, optimization, purchasing of fuel and quality assurance,
have to be covered by the building owner or the ESCo throughout the con-
tractual period.
In contrast to widespread opinions, the ESCo service package does not au-
tomatically need to include financing. Financing can be provided by the
building owner, the ESCo or a third financing partner, depending on who

Modular Scope of Services

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
can offer the better conditions.
3
In any case, the ESCo can be used as a ve-
hicle and facilitator for financing.
4

In the ESCos prices, all the expenditure items for the defined scope of ser-
vices throughout the contractual period must be included (all inclusive
prices). Correspondingly, project or life cycle costs (LCC) are calculated at
the Energy-Contracting model.
The functional, performance and price guarantees provided by the ESCo and
the outsourcing of technical and economic risks to the ESCo may constitute
an added value for the client, which should be considered at the comparison
with an in-house (do-it-yourself) implementation.

3
This view is also reflected in the Anglo-Saxon EPC markets, where two basic EPC models are differenti-
ated, mainly with regard to who finances the investment: Guaranteed Savings refers to a service
model without ESCo finance, whereas Shared Savings include financing in the ESCos service pack-
age.
4
This topic has been elaborated in more detail in [Bleyl+Suer 2006] or [Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008a].

References and Literature (selection)

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org

[2006/32/EC] Directive of the European Parliament and of the Coun-
cil on Energy End Use and Energy Services,
2006/32/EC as of 5 April 2006
[Bertholdi et.al. 2007] Paolo Bertoldi, Benigna Boza-Kiss, Silvia Rezessy
Latest Development of Energy Service Companies
across Europe - A European ESCO Update EC JRC In-
stitute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra 2007
[Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008] Bleyl, Jan W.; Schinnerl, Daniel Energy Contract-
ing to Achieve Energy Efficiency and Renewables us-
ing Comprehensive Refurbishment of Buildings as an
example in: Urban Energy Transition edited by Peter
Droege, Elsevier 2008
[Bleyl+Schinnerl 2008a] Bleyl, Jan W.; Schinnerl, Daniel in IEA dsm Task
XVI Opportunity Cost Tool, Comparison and Evalua-
tion of Financing Options for Energy Contracting Pro-
jects. A Manual for ESCo, ESCo customers and ESCo
project developers, download available from
www.ieadsm.org
[Bleyl 2009] Bleyl, Jan W. Integrated Energy Contracting (IEC). A
new Model to Combine Energy Efficiency and (Renew-
able) Energy Supply. IEA dsm Task XVI Discussion Pa-
per download available from www.ieadsm.org
[Bleyl 2011] Bleyl, Jan W. Conservation First! The New Integrated
Energy-Contracting Model to Combine Energy Efficien-
cy and Renewable Supply in Large Buildings and In-
dustry in ECEEE Summer Studies, paper ID 485,
Belambra Presqu'le de Giens, France June 2011
[Bundescontracting 2009] www.bundescontracting.at currently not online
[dena 2004] Deutsche Energie Agentur Leitfaden Energiespar-
Contracting Berlin 4
th
edition. December 2004.
[dena 2009] Deutsche Energie Agentur Leitfaden Energieliefer-
Contracting under preparation, publication planned for
2009.
[DIN 8930-5] Deutsches Institut fr Normung Klteanlagen und
Wrmepumpen. Terminologie Teil 5: Contracting Ber-
lin, November 2003.
[Eikmeier et al. 2009] Eikmeier, B., Seefeldt, F., Bleyl, J. W.; Arzt, C.:
Contracting im Mietwohnungsbau, Abschlubericht,
Bonn April 2009
[EN 15900] European Committee for Standardization (CEN/CLC/TF
189) Energy efficiency services Definitions and es-


Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
sential requirements draft under discussion. March
2009
[ESP 2009] Berliner Energieagentur Energiesparpartnerschaft Ber-
lin. Ergebnisse aus 23 Gebudepools nicht verffent-
licht Berlin 2009
[GEA 2009] Grazer Energieagentur GmbH, www.grazer-ea.at 2009
[GEFMA 540] German Facility Management Association Energie-
Contracting. Erfolgsfaktoren und Umsetzungshilfen
GEFMA 540, Ausgabe 2007-09
[IEAdsm 2009] Task XVI Competitive Energy Services of the IEA
(International Energy Agency) Demand Side Manage-
ment Implementing Agreement. Task flyer available
www.ieadsm.org
[IPMVP_2009] Efficiency Valuation Organization (EVO) International
Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol
(IPMVP) download available from http://www.evo-
world.org/index.php
[Satchwell et al 2010] Andrew Sactchwell, Charles Goldman; Peter
Larsen; Donald Gilligan; Terry Singer 2010 A Survey
of the U.S. ESCO Industry: Market Growth and Devel-
opment from 2008 to 2011 Lawrence Berkeley Nation-
al Laboratory, LBNL-3479E. June 2010
[SenStadt+BE 2002] Senatsverwaltung fr Stadtentwicklung des Landes
Berlin und Berliner Energieagentur Energieeinspar-
Contracting. Die Energiesparpartnerschaft. Ein Berliner
Erfolgsmodell April 2002.
[UZ 50] sterreichisches Umweltzeichen Richtline UZ 50 Ener-
gie-Contracting Wien 2003
[VDI 2067] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure 2067 - Wirtschaftlichkeit
gebudetechnischer Anlagen. Grundlagen und Kosten-
berechnung, Blatt 1 Dsseldorf 2000
[VDMA 24198] Verband Deutscher Maschinen und Anlagenbau Perfo-
mance Contracting. Begriffe, Prozessbeschreibung,
Leistungen VDMA 24198 Frankfurt/Main Februar 2000
[VfW 2009] Verband fr Wrmelieferung Der Verband fr Wrme-
lieferung in Zahlen Hannover 2009 download verfg-
bar unter www.energiecontracting.de
[Watt 1736-1819] Watt, James quoted after Wikipedia
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contracting as of 09-10-18

IEA DSM Task 16 Participating Countries and Contacts

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org

Austria
Energetic Solutions
Jan W. Bleyl (Operating Agent and NE)
Email: EnergeticSolutions@email.de
Tel: +43-650-7992820
Lendkai 29, 8020 Graz
Grazer Energieagentur GmbH
Daniel Schinnerl (NE until 06/2012)
Email: schinnerl@grazer-ea.at
Tel: +43-316-811848-15
Kaiserfeldgasse 13, 8010 Graz.
www.grazer-ea.at
Belgium
Fedesco Knowledgecenter
Lieven Vanstraelen (National Expert)
Email: lvanstraelen@energinvest.be
Tel: + 32-495-551 559
Royal Green House, Rue Royale 47
1000 Bruxelles www.fedesco.be.
Factor4
Johan Coolen (National Expert)
Email: johan.coolen@factor4.be
Tel: +32-3-22523-12
Lange Winkelhaakstraat 26
2060 Antwerpen, www.factor4.be.
Motiva Oy
P.O.Box 489, 00101 Helsinki
www.motiva.fi

Bureau of Energy Efficiency
Srinivasan Ramaswamy (NE 10/2009)
Email: srinivasan.ramaswamy@gtz.de
Tel: +91-11-26179699
Abhishek Nath (NE until 10/2009)
Email: abhishek@teri.res.in
Tel: +91-11-2617-9699
4th Floor, Sewa Bhavan, R.K. Puram
New Delhi -110066, India
www.bee-india.nic.in
Japan (Sponsor until 06/2009)
Japan Facility Solutions, Inc.
1-18 Ageba-cho Shinjuku-ku
Tokyo 162-0824, Japan
www.j-facility.com
Korea Energy Management Corporation
Industry Energy Management Department
Kim, Kil-Hwan (national expert)
Email: kimkh@kemco.or.kr
Tel: +82-31-260-4452
388, Poeun-Daero, Suji-Gu, Yongin-Si, Kyonggi-
Do, 448-994, Republic of Korea
www.kemco.or.kr
Netherlands
Escoplan
Ger Kempen (National Expert)
Email: g.kempen@escoplan.nl
Tel: +31-639-011339
Binnenhof 62-b 1412 LC Naarden
Essent Retail Services BV (until 06/2012)
Withuisveld 7, 6226 NV Maastricht
www.essent.nl


Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
Spain (since 07/2009)
Red Elctrica de Espaa
Dpto. Gestin de la Demanda
Andrs Sainz Arroyo (National Expert)
Email: asainz@ree.es
Tel. +34-91-650 20 12-2252
Paseo del Conde de los Gaitanes, 177
28109 Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain
www.ree.es
Hitachi Consulting (until 06/2012)
Borja Herrero Ruiz (National Expert)
Email: bherrero@hitachiconsulting.com
Tel. +34-91-7883100
Orense, 32, 28020, Madrid, Spain
www.hitachiconsulting.com
Swedish Energy Agency
Mattias Trnell (National Expert)
Email:mattias.tornell@energimyndigheten.se
Tel. +46-16 544 21 69
Fredrick Andersson (National Expert)
fredrick.andersson@energimyndigheten.se
Tel. +46 16 544 23 27
Kungsgatan 43, P.O. Box 310
SE-631 04 Eskilstuna
www.swedishenergyagency.se
Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE
Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy
and Communications
Markus Bareith
markus.bareit@bfe.admin.ch
Tel. +41 31 325 15 94
Mhlestrasse 4, 3063 Ittigen,
Postadresse: 3003 Bern
www.bfe.admin.ch

IEA DSM Task 16 Participating Institutions

Task 16
Competitive
Energy Services
www.ieadsm.org
IEA DSM Task 16 Participating Institutions

Austria
Energetic Solutions (since 07/2012)
Grazer Energieagentur (until 06/2012) www.grazer-ea.at

Belgium
Fedesco: www.fedesco.be
EnergInvest (since 07/2010): www.energinvest.fr
Factor4 (since 07/2010): www.factor4.be

Motiva Oy: www.motiva.fi

Bureau of Energy Efficiency: www.bee-india.nic.in

Japan (until 06/2009)
Japan Facility Solutions, Inc.: www.j-facility.com

Korea Energy Management Coorperation: www.kemco.or.kr

Netherlands
Essent Retail Services BV (until 06/2012): www.essent.nl
ESCOPLAN (since 07/2012): www.escoplan.nl

Spain (until 06/2012)
Red Elctrica de Espaa: www.ree.es
Hitachi Consulting (until 06/2012):
www.hitachiconsulting.com

Swedish Energy Agency: www.swedishenergyagency.se

Swiss Federal Office of Energy SFOE: www.bfe.admin.ch

Contact details are provided at the inside of the cover.
Energetic
Solutions
Jan W. Bleyl

What Is Energy Contracting - Task16 Discussion Paper Rev.3 - 131014

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

What Is Energy Contracting - Task16 Discussion Paper Rev.3 - 131014

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

IEA DSM Task 16:

Вам также может понравиться