Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
@ %/* 1$2
The anchorin. of the colu!ns into the foundations has been erfor!ed by e!beddin. the! into the
reinforced concrete bulbs of the infrastructure, on the hei.ht of a level 1base!ent2/ In order to establish
the hei.ht of the colu!n anchorin. 1e!beddin.2, the additional loadin. co!bination -ith the
increased seis! has been used 1e</ %2=
> P ; / *
* i
-here
*
@ %/A 1%2
The above condition 1e</ %2 assures the elastic behaviour of the connection of the colu!ns into the
foundations at the loads .iven by the seis!/
The non"linear static and dyna!ic analysis has been erfor!ed by !eans of D'AIN %DB ro.ra!,
-hich is a lane calculation ro.ra!, -hich allo-s for incursions in the elastic " lastic ran.e/ The
ro.ra! contains a finite ele!ent 1ele!ent ;2, -hich allo-s the develo!ent of lastic hin.es due to
the bendin. !o!ent and shear force/ Most of the calculation ro.ra!s used for the structure do not
contain this tye of finite ele!ent/ D'AIN %DB ro.ra!, bein. a lane calculation ro.ra!, for the
si!ulation of the satial behaviour of the structure, -as used Ctrain of fra!esC syste! -here the sa!e
dislace!ents of the fra!es -ere i!osed for each level/ In order to verify the concordance bet-een
the satial behaviour of the construction and the Ctrain of fra!esC !ethod, there have been reeated the
!odal analysis and the conventional forces calculation of the seis! action reviously deter!ined by
SPAN ro.ra!, usin. D'AIN %DB ro.ra!/ It resulted that the values of the vibration eriods of the
structure calculated -ith the t-o ro.ra!s are al!ost si!ilar/ After these calculation stes, there has
been si,ed the ho!o.enous structure -ith short lin+s and -ith lon. lin+s/
COMMENTS ON THE LATERAL RIGIDITY OF THE STRUCTURE
The studied alternatives, as results fro! table $, are the follo-in.=
1A2 Dual structure, co!osed of !o!ent resistin. fra!es 1M':2 B eccentrically braced fra!es 1>B:2
-ith short lin+ 1S#S, S#>2
1B2 Dual structure, co!osed of !o!ent resistin. fra!es 1M':2 B eccentrically braced fra!es 1>B:2
-ith lon. lin+ 1##S, ##>2
In both alternatives 1A and B2, there has been studied the ho!o.enous structure -ith lin+s -ith s!aller
section 1S#S, ##S2, resectively e<ual section 1S#>, ##>2 to the ones of the bea!s fro! the fra!e
sans -ithout bracin.s/ The follo-in. constructive solutions have been studied in order to analyse the
structures havin. reinforced concrete stabs 1table $2=
" 4o!o.enous lin+ B the rest of the structure0s bea!s in co!osite solution, !aintainin. the
di!ensions of the steel bea!s/
" 4o!o.enous lin+ B the rest of the structure0s bea!s in co!osite solution, -ith decreasin. the
di!ensions of the steel bea!s, -ith M
"
sBc
@ M
s
D e<uivalent co!osite bea!s/
" Co!osite lin+ B the rest of the structure0s bea!s in co!osite solution !aintainin. the di!ensions
of the steel bea!s/
" Co!osite lin+ B the rest of the structure0s bea!s in co!osite solution, -ith decreasin. the
di!ensions of the steel bea!s, -ith M
"
sBc
@ M
s
D e<uivalent co!osite bea!s/
In case of >B: -ith short lin+s, a decrease of the vibration eriod -ith $&/AE aears in the co!osite
solution in co!arison to the ho!o.enous solution/
In case of >B: -ith lon. lin+s, a decrease of the vibration eriod -ith $;/%E aears in the co!osite
solution in co!arison to the ho!o.enous solution/
/
TAB#> $
ANA#FS>D CAS>S
N
Li!" Be#$%&eg$e!'&
u'&i(e ) *i!"
Be#$ i! MFR Fir&'
$(e
+eri(
T1, & -
T.+e M#'e%
ri#*
Se/'i! M#'e%
ri#*
Se/'i! M#'e%
ri#*
Se/'i!
SLS
1
S0r'
T
M
7 / $ e <
Steel
4> &A*A
4> &**A
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
$,$(
SLS
1
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
$,**
SLS
2
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
$,$*
SLS
3
Steel
B
Concrete
4> &A*A
4> &**A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
$,**
SLS
4
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
$,$*
SLE
5
S0r'
T
M
7 / $ e <
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
Steel 4>A 7**
4>A AA*
Steel 4>A 7**
4>A AA*
$,$7
SLE
6
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
*,;;
SLE
7
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
*,;;
LLS
8
L!g
T
M
* / ) e >
Steel 4> A**A
4> &A*A
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
$,)A
LLS
19
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
$,$)
LLS
11
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $A*
$,%7
LLS
11
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
$,*;
LLS
12
Steel
B
Concrete
4>B A**
4>B &A*
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> A**A
4> &A*A
hr/c @ $%*
$,%$
LLE
13 L!g
T
M
* / ) e >
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A
Steel 4> 7**B
4> AA*B
Steel 4> 7**A
4> AA*A $,)%
LLE
14
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**B
4> AA*B
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
$,$*
LLE
15
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $A*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**B
4> AA*B
hr/c @ $%*
Steel
B
Concrete
4> 7**A
4> AA*A
hr/c @ $%*
$,*(
TAB#> $ 1cont/2
#e.end of the table
S#S D short lin+ -ith section s!aller than the one of the ad3acent sans0 bea!s
S#> D short lin+ -ith section e<ual to the one of the ad3acent sans0 bea!s
##S D lon. lin+ -ith section s!aller than the one of the ad3acent sans0 bea!s
##> D lon. lin+ -ith section e<ual to the one of the ad3acent sans0 bea!s
Steel D ho!o.enous section
Steel B Concrete D co!osite section
h
r/c
D thic+ness of the slab
The analysis confir!ed -hat the en.ineerin. ractice already +ne-, that the lateral ri.idity of the
eccentrically braced fra!es -ith short lin+s is .reater 1-ith 6E$&E2 than the one of the
eccentrically braced fra!es -ith lon. lin+s
COMMENTS ON NON%LINEAR STATIC CALCULATION
As re.ards all the analysed structures, -ith ho!o.enous or co!osite bea!s, the a!lification factor
of the conventional hori,ontal force roduced by seis!ic action 1
*
@ */$$ rad
Figure 1 =
S#S
ho!o.enous
solution
T
$
@ $/)A s
@ */*) rad
Figure 2 =
##S
ho!o.enous
solution
GRINZI OMOGENE HEA600,HEA550;BARA DISIPATIVA SCURTA HEA450,HEA400
Time : 3.000
H'INII OMOH>N>4>A7**, 4>AAA*G BA'A DISIPATI?A #UNHA4>AA**, 4>A&A*
Ti!e = )/***
T
$
@ $/$* s
@ */*(
rad
Figure 3 =
S#S
ho!o.enous short lin+ B e<uivalent co!osite bea!s
T
$
@ $/%7 s
@ */*%
rad
Figure 4 =
##S
ho!o.enous lon. lin+ B e<uivalent co!osite bea!s
T
$
@ $/$* s
@ */$* rad
Figure 5 = S#S
co!osite
short lin+ B
e<uivalent
co!osite
bea!s
T
$
@ $/%$ s
@ */*% rad
Figure 6 =
##S
co!osite
lon. lin+ B
e<uivalent
co!osite
bea!s
The follo-in. conclusions result fro! the non"linear static calculation 1fi./ %(2=
H'INIICOMPOIIT>4>AA**,4>A&A*8$Ac!GBA'A DISIPATI?A SCU'TA 4>A&A*,4>A&**
Ti!e = )/***
H'INIICOMPOIIT>4>AA**,4>A&A*1$%c!2GBA'A DISIPATI?A #UNHA4>AA**,4>A&A*
Ti!e = %/;6*
H'INIICOMPOIIT>4>AA**,4>A&A*GBA'ADISIPATI?ASCU'TA4>A&A*,4>A&**8$Ac!
Ti!e = %/;;*
H'INIICOMPOIIT>4>AA**,4>A&A*GBA'ADISIPATI?A #UNHA 4>AA**,4>A&A*1$%c!2
Ti!e = )/***
" the lastic hin.es aear u to
*
@*/*)% radM
all
@*/*% rad2 and shear base forces / As re.ards the !a5i!u!
value of the dissiate ener.y, its !a5i!u! value is roduced by the artificial accelero.ra! 1?rancea
$;(( sectru! " fi./ $&2
"The >l Centro $;&* 1fi./ $$2 and Me5ico City $;;A 1fi./ $%2 accelero.ra!s roduce s!all lateral
dislace!ents and rotations of the lin+s of @$)/* c! resectively