Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 12

Suspension of disbelief

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Jump to: navigation, search

It has been suggested that Central conceit be merged into this article. (Discuss)
Proposed since July 2013.

This article is written like a personal reflection or opinion essay that states the
Wikipedia editor's particular feelings about a topic, rather than the opinions of
experts. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (June 2013)
Suspension of disbelief or willing suspension of disbelief is a term coined in 1817 by the poet
and aesthetic philosopher Samuel Taylor Coleridge, who suggested that if a writer could infuse a
"human interest and a semblance of truth" into a fantastic tale, the reader would suspend
judgement concerning the implausibility of the narrative. Suspension of disbelief often applies to
fictional works of the action, comedy, fantasy, and horror genres. Cognitive estrangement in
fiction involves using a person's ignorance or lack of knowledge to promote suspension of
disbelief.
The phrase "suspension of disbelief" came to be used more loosely in the later 20th century,
often used to imply that the burden was on the reader, rather than the writer, to achieve it. This
might be used to refer to the willingness of the audience to overlook the limitations of a medium,
so that these do not interfere with the acceptance of those premises. These fictional premises may
also lend to the engagement of the mind and perhaps proposition of thoughts, ideas, art and
theories.
[1]

Suspension of disbelief is often an essential element for a magic act or a circus sideshow act. For
example, an audience is not expected to actually believe that a woman is cut in half or transforms
into a gorilla
[2]
in order to enjoy the performance.
Contents
[show]
Coleridge's original formulation[edit]
Coleridge coined the phrase in his Biographia Literaria, published in 1817, in the context of the
creation and reading of poetry.
[3]
Chapter XIV describes the preparations with Wordsworth for
their revolutionary collaboration Lyrical Ballads (first edition 1798), for which Coleridge had
contributed the more romantic, Gothic pieces including The Rime of the Ancient Mariner. Poetry
and fiction involving the supernatural had gone out of fashion to a large extent in the 18th
century, in part due to the declining belief in witches and other supernatural agents among the
educated classes, who embraced the rational approach to the world offered by the new science.
Alexander Pope, notably, felt the need to explain and justify his use of elemental spirits in The
Rape of the Lock, one of the few English poems of the century that invoked the supernatural.
Coleridge wished to revive the use of fantastic elements in poetry. The concept of "willing
suspension of disbelief" explained how a modern, enlightened audience might continue to enjoy
such types of story.
Coleridge recalled:
... It was agreed, that my endeavours should be directed to persons and characters
supernatural, or at least romantic, yet so as to transfer from our inward nature a human
interest and a semblance of truth sufficient to procure for these shadows of imagination
that willing suspension of disbelief for the moment, which constitutes poetic faith. Mr.
Wordsworth on the other hand was to propose to himself as his object, to give the charm
of novelty to things of every day, and to excite a feeling analogous to the supernatural, by
awakening the mind's attention from the lethargy of custom, and directing it to the
loveliness and the wonders of the world before us ...
[4]

The notion of such an action by an audience was however recognized in antiquity, as seen
particularly in the Roman theoretical concerns of Horace, who also lived in an age of increasing
skepticism about the supernatural, in his Ars Poetica.
Examples in literature[edit]
Suspension of disbelief is sometimes said to be an essential component of live theater, where it
was recognized by Shakespeare, who refers to it in the Prologue to Henry V:
"[...] make imaginary puissant [...] 'tis your thoughts that now must deck our kings [...]
turning accomplishment of many years into an hourglass."
See also dramatic convention.
In popular culture[edit]
According to the theory, suspension of disbelief is an essential ingredient for any kind of
storytelling. With any film, the viewer has to ignore the reality that they are viewing a two-
dimensional moving image on a screen and temporarily accept it as reality in order to be
entertained. Black-and-white films provide an obvious early example that audiences are willing
to suspend disbelief, no matter how unreal the images appear, for the sake of entertainment. With
the exception of totally color blind people (See: Achromatopsia), no person viewing these films
sees the real world without color, but they are still willing to suspend disbelief and accept the
images in order to be entertained.
Suspension of disbelief is also supposed to be essential for the enjoyment of many movies and
TV shows involving complex stunts, special effects, and seemingly unrealistic plots,
characterizations, etc. The theory professes to explain why a subset of action movie fans are
willing to accept the idea that, for example: The good guy can get away with shooting guns in
public places (without getting in trouble with the local law-enforcement himself), never running
out of ammunition (Rambo movies), or that cars will explode with a well-placed shot to the gas
tank (numerous action movies use this trope/plot element).
Suspension of disbelief is also needed when a character is not supposed to age over the course of
a series (because of being a vampire or be eternal/immortal because of some quirk/trait/power of
the character) but the actor eventually does as seen in Angel and Highlander. Likewise, the
various Terminators played by Arnold Schwarzenegger are supposed to be standardized units
from the same assembly line, but the original cyborg in 1984's The Terminator looks noticeably
younger than the cyborgs with the "same" organic covering that appear in the 1991 and 2003
sequel movies.
In the three CSI series, it is frequently implied that forensic test results are received immediately
after said tests are performed; in reality, it can take several months to get results back, it is
inconvenient to the plots to show the necessary waiting period. To advance the plot, a suspension
of disbelief is necessary, and viewers must accept that the waiting period has passed or that there
is no waiting period to begin with. As well, in real life, crime scene investigators are not
responsible for the wide array of police duties that the show's characters typically carry out
(investigation, arrest, interrogation, etc.); they limit themselves to forensic and lab work; these
series would have audiences believe that crime scene units are solely responsible for entire
investigations, including the arrest.
Also another suspension of disbelief is having an episode of a TV show (or a movie) set in a
foreign country and have all the actors portraying citizens of said country speak another language
entirely and fluently (example: a setting in Germany during the Third Reich where people
dressed as German citizens and German officers speak fluent English).
All sorts of story-telling involving puppets or cartoon characters demand suspension of disbelief
on the part of the audience, since it is obvious that the "people" seen are not real living persons.
On the Muppet Show, the rods controlling Kermit's arms are clearly visible, but the audience is
expected to ignore them.
Animations and comics[edit]
One contemporary example of suspension of disbelief is the audience's acceptance that
Superman hides his identity from the world by simply donning a pair of glasses, conservative
clothing, and acting in a "mild-mannered" fashion. Not only is the disguise so thin as to be
ridiculous, but also in the TV series, Adventures of Superman, this absurdity was carried to an
extreme. Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen constantly suspected Clark Kent of being Superman, yet
when obvious evidence was right in their faces such as times when Clark was missing his
glasses they never saw the resemblance. (Noel Neill and Jack Larson, in DVD commentary,
said their standard answer when questioned about this was, "We wanted to keep our jobs!")
Some find it strange that while some audience members took issue with the flimsiness of
Superman's disguise, they didn't take issue with the idea of the existence of a superbeing whose
only weakness was kryptonite. One arguing from the theory of suspension of disbelief would
contend that while Superman's abilities and vulnerabilities are the foundational premises the
audience accepted as their part of the initial deal; they did not accept a persistent inability for
otherwise normal characters to recognize a close colleague solely because of minor changes in
clothing.
Gary Larson discussed the question with regard to his comic strip, The Far Side; he noted that
readers wrote him to complain that a male mosquito referred to his job sucking blood when it is
in fact the females that drain blood, but that the same readers accepted that the mosquitoes live in
houses, wear clothes, and speak English.
Video games[edit]
Video games are also said to require suspension of disbelief. Often realism is compromised even
in games that set out to be realistic, either intentionally to not overly complicate game mechanics
or due to technical limitations.
Some games based on Spider-Man have the comic hero swinging around a city with his webs
sticking to nothing but the sky. Many sandbox games enable the player to control a character
continuously who is not required to, for instance, eat, drink, use toilets, or sleep. A character may
be able to drive a vehicle continuously without ever needing to refuel, or be able to sustain
inexplicably high levels of injury and recover without even medical attention.
Fighting games often feature magical elements, such as characters who can throw fireballs,
which has become a staple of traditional fighting games.
[5]

Other video games feature instant death upon falling into water instead of giving the player a
chance to swim out before drowning (such as a few episodes of Grand Theft Auto and many
others). In contrast, some games show falling into water as completely safe when in reality the
impact would be lethal (most notably in Banjo-Kazooie). Also, in many video games
(particularly RPGs), a character will say the same phrase over and over indefinitely when
repeatedly talked to. Some video games begin with a tutorial in which the player is taught how to
play. These are often woven into the story, for example a character in the game might say to the
player, "Press the triangle button to jump! Walk up to a crystal to save your game! Don't forget
to use the 'select' button to change your weapons!" and so forth. In the fictional context of the
game world, such sequences make no sense. A humorous poke at this character-given tutorial is
present in Super Paper Mario, where the character Bestovius refers to a 'greater being' (the
player) who will understand the tutorial being given.
The Metal Gear series is famous for its suspension of disbelief, partially due to its postmodern
style that emerged with the release of Metal Gear Solid in 1998, sealing itself with Metal Gear
Solid 2 in 2001. The games use an assortment of humour; breaking the fourth wall; speculative
fiction; and extraordinary and unusual events, many of which go unexplained and unquestioned
by the characters. These are done for both the purpose of innovative gameplay as well
imaginative characters and story, unrestricted by science and logic.
A commonly seen example throughout the series is the example of the radio support team, who
will give control and interface instructions through conversation with the player character. For
this reason, the radio support team, who are all legitimate characters, work also as gameplay
advisors seemingly aware that they're inside a video game. This helps with the suspension of
disbelief as the game is no longer restricted by the attempt of the author to simulate reality.
Examples in politics[edit]
It was used by Hillary Clinton during the United States' 2008 presidential election preliminaries.
Clinton apparently considered General Petraeus' reports on Iraq to be unbelievable or not factual,
and used the phrase "suspension of disbelief" loosely, in this case, implying such to be a
requirement to accept his statements.
[6][7]

Psychology of Suspension of Disbelief[edit]
Psychological critic Norman Holland points to a neuroscientific explanation. When we hear or
watch any narrative, our brains go wholly into perceiving mode. They turn off our systems for
acting or planning to act. With them go our systems for assessing reality. We believe. We have,
in Coleridge's second, more accurate phrase, poetic faith. Thats why humans have such
trouble recognizing lies. We first believe, then have to make a conscious effort to disbelieve.
Only when we stop perceiving to think about what we have seen or heard, only then do we assess
its truth-value. Watching a movie or reading a story, if we are really into the fiction,
transported, in the psychologists' term, we are, as Immanuel Kant pointed out long ago,
disinterested. We respond aesthetically, without purpose. We just enjoy. We dont judge the
truth of what were perceiving, even though, if we stop being transported and think about it, we
know quite well its a fiction.
[8][9]

Suspension of disbelief has also been used within a mental health context by Frank DeFulgentis
in his book Flux. It is an attempt to describe the phenomenon of forgetting irrational thoughts
associated with cases of OCD. In the book, the author suggests 'suspending disbelief' as opposed
to forcing ourselves to forget; similar to how one would put a virus in quarantine. We can
thereby allow ourselves to be absorbed in the activities around us until these irrationalities vanish
on their own accord.
Criticisms[edit]
As in the examples of Superman's powers and Gary Larson's cartoon, it is unclear that
suspension of disbelief correctly describes an audience's perception of art. If the theory were to
be true, the individual events of suspension would appear to be highly selective. (It would appear
that one chooses to suspend disbelief for the ability to fly, but not to suspend it for myopic co-
workers.)
Aesthetic philosophers generally reject claims that suspension of disbelief accurately
characterizes the relationship between people and "fictions." Kendall Walton notes that, if
viewers were to truly suspend disbelief at a horror movie and accept its images as true, they
would have a true-to-life set of reactions. For instance, audience members would cry out, "Look
behind you!" to an endangered on-screen character or call the police when they witnessed an on-
screen murder.
[10]

However, many of these criticisms simply fail to notice that Coleridge's original statement came
in a restrictive clause. The formulation "...that willing suspension of disbelief for the moment
which constitutes poetic faith," of necessity implies that there are different sorts of suspension of
disbelief and specifies that poetic faith is one instance of a larger class. One need not choose to
believe that a character in a horror film is a real person in order, for example, to choose to
believe that the character is looking at the building seen in the following reverse-shot. More
often than not, both beliefs would be equally false.
Not all authors believe that suspension of the disbelief adequately characterizes the audience's
relationship to imaginative works of art. J. R. R. Tolkien challenges this concept in his essay "On
Fairy-Stories", choosing instead the paradigm of secondary belief based on inner consistency of
reality. Tolkien says that, in order for the narrative to work, the reader must believe that what he
reads is true within the secondary reality of the fictional world. By focusing on creating an
internally consistent fictional world, the author makes secondary belief possible. Tolkien argues
that suspension of disbelief is only necessary when the work has failed to create secondary
belief. From that point the spell is broken, and the reader ceases to be immersed in the story and
must make a conscious effort to suspend disbelief or else give up on it entirely.
See also[edit]
555 (telephone number)
Aestheticization of violence
Deus ex machina
Dramatic convention
Fourth wall
Paradox of fiction
Suspension of judgment
The Tommy Westphall Universe Hypothesis
Verisimilitude (literature)
References[edit]

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this
article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged
and removed. (December 2007)
1. Jump up ^ Welkos, Robert W. (15 April 1993). "From 'King Kong' to 'Indecent Proposal,'
audiences have been asked to buy a premise that can make or break a film". The Los Angeles
Times. Retrieved 2010-10-24.
2. Jump up ^ Botos, Tim (21 August 2008). "Gorilla Girl sideshow act hangs on despite changing
times". GateHouse News Service; Patriot Ledger. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
3. Jump up ^ Safire, William. On Language; Suspension of Disbelief. New York Times. 7 October
2007.
4. Jump up ^ Coleridge, Biographia Literaria, 1817, Chapter XIV
5. Jump up ^ "Your Turn: We don't need another Hero". Sydney Morning Herald. 3 February 2010.
Retrieved 2010-02-22.
6. Jump up ^ Lake, Eli (12 September 2007). "Clinton Spars With Petraeus on Credibility". The
New York Sun (Washington, D.C.). Retrieved 7 November 2010.
7. Jump up ^ Hillary Clinton (11 September 2007). HILLARY CLINTON: PETRAEUS REPORTS
REQUIRE WILLING SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF (excerpt from the Hearing on the Petraeus
Report) (streaming video) (Television) (in English). CSPAN. Event occurs at 0:25. Retrieved 7
November 2010. "Despite what I view as your rather extraordinary efforts in your testimony both
yesterday and today, I think that the reports that you provide to us really require the willing
suspension of disbelief."
8. Jump up ^ Holland, Norman (2008). "Spiderman? Sure! The Neuroscience of Disbelief".
Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 33 (4): 312-320. Retrieved 28 April 2014.
9. Jump up ^ Holland, Norman. brain.com "Literature and the Brain". http://www.literatureandthe
brain.com. PsyArt. Retrieved 28 April 2014.
10. Jump up ^ "Fearing Fictions", Kendall L. Walton, JSTOR (The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 75,
No. 1 (01-1978), pp. 527). Retrieved 3 January 2007.
External links[edit]
Coleridge's Biographia Literaria, Chapter XIV, containing the term
[hide]
v
t
e
Narrative

Character
Antagonist
Antihero
Archenemy
Characterization
Deuteragonist
False protagonist
Focal character
Foil
Protagonist
Stock character
Supporting character
Tritagonist
Narrator
Character arc

Plot
Clich
Climax
Conflict
Dialogue
Dramatic structure
Exposition
Plot device
Plot twist
Reveal
Subplot
Trope
Kishtenketsu

Setting
Utopia
Dystopia
Alternate history
Fictional location
o city
o country
o universe

Theme
Leitmotif
Moral
Motif

Style
Diction
Figure of speech
Imagery
Literary technique
Narrative mode
Stylistic device
Suspension of disbelief
Symbolism
Tone

Form
Fable
Fabliau
Fairy tale
Folktale
Hypertext
Flash fiction
Legend
Novella
Novel
Epic
Parable
Play
Poem
Screenplay
Short story
List of narrative forms

Genre
Adventure
Comic
Crime
Docufiction
Epistolary
Erotic
Fiction
Fantasy
Historical
Horror
Magic realism
Mystery
Paranoid
Philosophical
Political
Romance
Saga
Satire
Science
Speculative
Superhero
Thriller
Urban
Western
List of literary genres

Narrator
First-person
Second-person
Third-person
Stream of consciousness
Unreliable

Tense
Past
Present
Future

Related
Audience
Author
Fiction writing
Creative nonfiction
Literary theory
Narrative structure
Narratology
Rhetoric
Screenwriting
Storytelling

Literature portal

<img src="//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAutoLogin/start?type=1x1" alt="" title=""
width="1" height="1" style="border: none; position: absolute;" />
Retrieved from
"http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Suspension_of_disbelief&oldid=616977142"
Categories:
Fiction
Plot (narrative)
Narratology
Hidden categories:
Articles to be merged from July 2013
All articles to be merged
Use dmy dates from May 2013
Wikipedia articles needing style editing from June 2013
All articles needing style editing
Articles needing additional references from December 2007
All articles needing additional references
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Special:Search Go

Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikimedia Shop
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Espaol
Esperanto
Franais
Galego
Italiano

Nederlands
Portugus
Simple English
Edit links
This page was last modified on 14 July 2014 at 23:22.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy
Policy. Wikipedia is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-
profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Mobile view

Вам также может понравиться