Discrete event simulation uses basic built in behavior of bout benefits of how to measure and how to

govern dynamic design dilemma into growing upon nap networking architectural structures
based upon define dynamic loop judgments {define, measure, analyze, improve, control, define}
Mylene Sylvestre && Susanne Weber
(draft copy September 02
sd
2014 ::: email to : susanne.weber!mail.com"
Discrete event simulation has focussing up battleground of measurable metric reality fashion flows and
wrapping up point overviews of responsible request engines.
In fact, primordial dynamic design that has been involving within discrete event simulation deals with
theological loop structures {define, measure, analyze, improve, control, define}. Although, scaring choosy
safe udgment ury, returns higher valuable processing of human advancing soul satisfaction and adust
human desirable wishes and aim obects. !ecause, balance is theological symbolic sign of ustice around the
whole world, an automatic defined loop has been created that is equal to {sha"e, quiver, sha"e}.
#urthermore, applied ustice symbolism around theological hierarchy homes of society aspects and effects,
requires translation techniques of desirable recording perfection and e$pertise environments belong to any
unify unit %how to measure principles& and intentional issues of consumable use %how to govern
functionalism&, whereby money investments and financial obects are the real responsive e$citing engines
udge human persons and thin" up their life styles.
Indeed, historic storing processing provo"es oining in pair dynamics of choosy contest bout and under
custom's seal root(roof reality fashion flow. )ven though, surround scene shows burrow translation
symbolism and supporting synchronization of applied thread(tas" ob scheduling. *hus, ob scheduling is a
focussing up advances that are responsible returns e$citing surround symbolism inside supporting society.
*heological aspects of any systematic symbolism across applied thread(tas" ob scheduling deals with
translation techniques and cabling customization of #droit be$avior of transition translation traceability %oins
in pair desi!n &!ot driven symbolism to overdrive somet$in! for furt$er description' belon! to &wait for ($old
dar) *+ w$en (retrievable processin! of clear metric of y+ is ac$ievable' usin! ((metric, nap", (wa)e up, !row
upon", (custom, event", ($andle, $old"+ set
#or much of its long history, astrology has developed as a technology, through empirical observation,
adoption of useful techniques, and the discourse of ideas. +i"e other technologies, it is a discipline designed
to meet specific needs. ,racticing astrologers today are more concerned with offering quality services to the
people they help than they are with the search for universal truths, which has been the thrust of modern
science. Although many astrologers believe that there is undiscovered science in what they do, most are
satisfied to develop the technology without scientific e$planation. #or them, astrology wor"s well within the
limits of its applications. As long as the astrological discourse continues, they believe astrology continues to
improve. -owever, many scientists today are unwilling to accept astrology as a technology. .ome of the
most vocal critics have demanded unambiguous demonstrations that would e$plain astrology as a universal
science. /therwise, they insist that astrology, regardless of its practical functions, must simply be wrong.
0ormally, researchers would try to reverse(engineer an unfamiliar technology to simple essentials in order to
discover how it is supposed to wor" and how it can be tested. 1et there has been no concerted effort to do
this with astrology.2 *here are difficulties in measuring the long(term cycles and comple$ issues that
astrology handles. #or e$ample, a .aturn cycle lasts 34 years and a 0eptune cycle is 256 years. )vents that
are measured in such long(term cycles seem distinctly at odds with scientific measurements, which are
typically in cycles per second. 1et despite these long(term cycles, astrology depends on accurate timing and
has a preference for unusual events, both of which have made it hard to test. *hese e$treme requirements
bring with them the question of theory, which is whether scientific methods have the capacity to encompass
astrological precepts without entering into areas of uncertainty where established scientific beliefs would be
questioned. As can be seen by the strange inconsistencies in quantum mechanics for e$ample, the re(
e$amination of e$isting scientific beliefs can be deeply perple$ing. 1et this is the very stuff of inquiry upon
which science itself depends. *herefore, the use of ran"ing and rating methods greatly elevates the sensitivity
of correlation testing, even for small effect sizes. Although small effect sizes might be due to chance
fluctuations or un"nown artifacts, these possibilities rapidly diminish with each successive ran" that goes in
the predicted direction. *he e$ample studies ust mentioned, for sports achievement and reddishness of hair
color, which were properly designed with ran"ing methods, have demonstrated statistically significant
eminence effects in the predicted direction in peer reviewed studies. !ecause each of these tests have been
successfully replicated numerous times, and have been publicly discussed for over twenty years without
falsification, they can be considered to demonstrate evidence of astrological effects.7 8ore tests of different
astrological theories, modeled on these e$emplary tests, need to be performed to ascertain what current
science could support.
A category of behaviors that could unify these familiar e$amples has not emerged into the paradigm of
normal science, even though in light of the -ermetic ma$im they conceptually suggest a type of symmetry
that might somehow arise from the natural e$pansion of space. 9iven the reliance upon statistical reality and
the erosion of conventional cause and effect within the quantum worldview, these unusual behaviors seem to
suggest a necessary category of associated natural processes that might be described as cosmological
symmetry. .imply stated, the behaviors of microcosms accompany the behaviors of their macrocosms and
vice versa, albeit in different although complementary ways. *hus, the e$perience of cosmic symmetry, as
interpreted by the -ermetic ma$im, does not need to be as obvious as it is in holographic and simple fractal
images, nor would it always be easy to find the boundaries that separate the inner from the outer. Also, the
great diversity of astrological e$pressions suggests that the effects of this symmetry could be compounded or
negated in different comple$ combinations. 1et in principle, within a cosmic environment, changes at one
boundary should symmetrically and synchronistically complement changes at another boundary. Implicit in
this view is that the operational effects of a relationship between the micro and macro worlds would be
understood through observation, evaluation, and inference, the same as in any empirical science. Although
the implicated complementarity of cosmic symmetry in action might be far less conspicuous than the
classical symmetries that we are already familiar with, it could be ust as prevalent in nature.
:ating and ran"ing methods enhance the sensitivity of correlation effects and have the added advantage of
reducing artifacts and bias. *hese sensitive correlation methods are suggested by the ancient ma$im ;the
stars incline< they do not compel,; and they should be applied in all astrological research or reasons given for
why they are not. It is argued that "ind(type tests, which have been repeated hundreds of times and are
widely assumed to be evidence against astrology, are actually tests of non(astrological artifacts. *hese
artifacts, which relate to the general practices of giving advice, have been unfairly selected in these tests to
the e$clusion of astrological features. .cientific studies of astrology need to be based on conscientious test
designs that incorporate measurements of tendencies or eminence, which separate astrological effects from
artifacts.
=eighted methods that separate effects from artifacts should be applied in all astrological research, or
reasons given for why they are not. /therwise, there is no scientific assurance that the e$periments have not
been biased or that the criteria for success have been so narrowly defined that the result could be interpreted
as supporting the astrological hypothesis that ;the stars do not compel.;