2005 The Medicine Publishing Company Ltd 21 PSYCHIATRY 4:5
Developmental psychopathology is a relatively modern term for a discipline with a long heritage. Pre-eminent among its early proponents was Sigmund Freud. Freud realized that what others chose to sideline as abnormal in the sense of being beyond comprehension according to the usual principles of psychological functioning might instead have great value in revealing some profound and remarkable things about the workings of the human mind. It was not simply that he exhorted us to attend to disguised expressions of personal meaning in neurotic or psychotic clini- cal features, nor simply that he introduced radical new ways to detect and analyse such meanings through free association and the analysis of patterns of interpersonal relation (transference) between patient and therapist. It was also that he set his clinical observations in developmental perspective, giving us a fresh view of the development of mental disorder and, beyond this, the nature of psychological development itself. What is developmental psychopathology? The principles of developmental psychopathology are simple. In order to identify the processes of typical development and to trace the trajectory of normal mental growth, one needs to encompass a picture of how those processes and that trajectory can go awry. And in order to understand how psychopathology arises, one needs to see how development normally unfolds and pinpoint where and how the course of psychological integration and growth has been derailed. This approach presents a fundamental challenge to anyone who studies the human mind. The problem is to decide how narrow or how broad a domain of psychological functioning one needs to encompass within a given explanation. It certainly makes life simpler if one chooses to exclude such phenomena as perversions or persecutory experiences as beyond the pale of psychological explanation. Freud made a different choice. Meaning in madness Freuds investigative stance was to try to find meaning in mad- ness and to seek a coherent psychological story of development for abnormal functioning. This approach promises to show us new things, precisely because certain goings-on in the mind that are too subtle or too familiar to attract notice in typically developing indi- viduals may be writ large in cases of psychopathology. In Mourning and Melancholia, 1 for example, Freud suggested that if one listens to the melancholic person (or, as he insisted, a particular class of melancholic person), what one hears is not merely someone who feels worthless and despicable, but in effect two figures in relation to one another. One of these is indeed downcast and oppressed, the object of scathing criticism and scorn; but then there is the other figure, a disguised but insistent tyrant, a berating internal object who occupies a platform within the mind from which to unleash a condemning, hateful tirade upon the self. The patient is both implicated in, and subject to, each of these figures and the sado-masochistic exchanges in which they are embroiled. As if this were not revolutionary enough as a picture of severe depression, Freud took us further in offering a developmental account of how this unhappy relation of oneself at war with oneself comes into being. It does so through identification, a process by means of which highly conflictual and ambivalent relations with someone become interiorized (as the developmental psycholo- gist Vygotsky would have expressed it) in such a way that a part of the personality assumes the role of the attacked, and another part assumes the role of the attacker. How an internal world develops What Freud gives us in this scenario is a vision of how pathology is the lived-out expression of human relationships instantiated within an individuals mind. He also shows how the development of personality proceeds through the internalization of patterns of relations with others, coloured and distorted by ones own feelings and experiences feelings and experiences that depend upon the time in an individuals life when the internalizations are taking place. The foundations of personality are laid in early childhood, and the experiences of infants and young children are not like those of adults, perhaps especially because young children do not have the same framework of reality within which to adjust and correct their perceptions and experiences. Largely on the basis of her work with very young children who were free to play, Melanie Klein elaborated a picture of develop- ment in which a young child is prone to experience the world in terms of fairy-tale or nightmarish transactions among people. 2
Sometimes the people are less than fully human figures (known as part-objects) that embody functions of people such as feeding or withholding or satisfying or invading. Young children might identify with such figures, experiencing themselves to have their characteristics (as in play), or they might need to establish defen- sive relations towards them. Klein delineated two positions, or stances, that young children can occupy in relation to the world- as-experienced: the paranoidschizoid position is characterized by black-and- white, beatific or threatening relations of a kind that induce feelings of bliss, or of persecution and threat of annihilation in the depressive position, by contrast, the world seems more Psychodynamics and developmental psychopathology Peter Hobson Peter Hobson is Tavistock Professor of Developmental Psychopathology in the University of London, London, UK, based at the Tavistock Clinic and the Institute of Child Health, University College London. He trained in psychiatry at the Maudsley Hospital, London, has a PhD in experimental psychology from the University of Cambridge and is an Associate Member of the British Psychoanalytical Society. His research interests are focused on the pivotal importance of interpersonal relations for human psychological development, with special reference to autism. PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES 2005 The Medicine Publishing Company Ltd 22 PSYCHIATRY 4:5 coherent and forgiving, and figures are more like whole people towards whom the child feels yearning and concern, and in relation to whom the predominant anxiety is that of harming or losing a valued and depended-upon person. From a developmental perspective, concern and caring towards others, as well as stability in the way that others are experienced, are developmental achievements. They occur only if the young child receives the sensitive attention and containment of at least one caregiver. When this is not available, abnormality may arise as the expression of maldeveloped offshoots of a developmental process that we all share. In other words, the potential for abnor- mality including the paranoidschizoid or perverse is within all of us. Contemporary research This contribution will now consider how such perspectives on mental and interpersonal functioning, for so long caricatured and derided by scientists, are being elaborated through systematic con- trolled studies of attachment, the transgenerational transmission of pathology through interpersonal relations, and autism. The case of borderline personality disorder Although formally recognized as a syndrome according to a set of co-occurring clinical features (Figure 1), borderline personality disorder may have a variety of manifestations both across and within individuals. No wonder that the condition attracts a range of psychiatric diagnoses, including depression and even atypical psychosis. There is little evidence that it has a genetic or other constitutional basis, but substantially more evidence that factors such as childhood separations and maltreatment play an aetiologi- cal role. Yet, until recently, the scientific evidence for this being a disorder rooted in adverse early experiences in essence a disorder of interpersonal relations has been circumstantial. That situation is changing. Take the issue of attachment, for example. In recent years, research has extended from studies of children to investigation of the mental representation of attach- ment in adults. In the Adult Attachment Interview developed in the USA by Dr Mary Main, individuals are interviewed about their own childhoods and give descriptions of their relationships with caregivers and experiences when they suffered illness, separation or trauma. Transcripts are coded not so much for what partici- pants say, but the ways in which they organize their thoughts and feelings effectively, their defensive strategies towards painful memories. Some people are Free to Evaluate their attachments, talking coherently even when they report unhappy events. Others are Dismissing and terse, for example describing how things were just normal, even when there are indications that they were very difficult or traumatic. It has emerged that a third category, that of Enmeshed Pre- occupied, where participants are unable to give a coherent account of their experiences of childhood and instead tend to vacillate in viewpoint, is especially characteristic of women with borderline personality disorder. In one study, for example, borderline women contrasted with matched depressed women in being fearful, con- fused and overwhelmed in relation to attachment experiences, and moreover unable to integrate memories of trauma and loss without becoming disorientated. 3
In a further study of similar groups of adult women, Hobson 1 The syndrome of borderline personality disorder Five or more of the following: Frantic efforts to avoid real or imagined abandonment A pattern of unstable and intense interpersonal relationships Identity disturbance Impulsiveness in at least two areas that are potentially self- damaging Recurrent suicidal behaviour, gestures or threats, or self- mutilating behaviour Affective instability Chronic feelings of emptiness Inappropriate, intense anger Transient, stress-related paranoid ideation or severe dissociative symptoms et al. 4 videotaped psychotherapy assessment interviews and asked blind raters to evaluate participants ways of experiencing the psychotherapist and/or other people (as reported) by scoring a set of descriptors that reflected features of Kleins paranoidschizoid and depressive positions. For example, excerpts of the videotape were rated for whether the patient experienced others (including the therapist) as persecutory, self-preoccupied, and/or unavailable, or as more benign and helpful. The results showed not only that such clinical features clustered in the way that Klein had described, but also that paranoidschizoid features were significantly more characteristic of the women with borderline personality disorder than those with depression. Borderline personality disorder is thus characterized both by what attachment theorists call Enmeshed Preoccupied forms of mental representation, and by many features of what Klein called paranoidschizoid functioning. These fragmented and conflictual patterns of thinking and feeling can be evaluated within affected individuals minds, and as they are lived out in their relationships. Not only this, but one can observe what appear to be the effects of such relations on the infant offspring of mothers with the disorder. In a recent study, 5 a large majority of 1-year-old infants of mothers with borderline personality disorder were found to be disorgan- ized in their attachments, a pattern of relatedness that often leads to untoward relationships and sometimes psychopathology later in life. 6 Here we see how interpersonal relations are not only shaped by, but potentially shape, internal workings of the mind that may become manifest in psychiatric disorder. The case of autism There is a danger that psychotherapists who study autism will be tarred by the brush of those such as Bettelheim (an Austrian-born psychoanalyst) who have claimed that the disorder is psychogenic. In fact, a substantial number of child psychotherapists and ana- lysts who have devoted time to studying the condition highlight the childrens constitutional abnormalities. For example, Mahler 7
made prescient observations of how children with autism are unable to use their mothers as beacons of emotional orientation, a description that has found ample confirmation in recent quasi- PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES 2005 The Medicine Publishing Company Ltd 23 PSYCHIATRY 4:5 experimental studies of the childrens limited propensity to perceive and learn from adults ways of reacting to objects and events in the world. 8 One of the most powerful insights that autism can give us is what happens to development when certain processes basic to human functioning across the lifespan processes that have been documented and explored by dynamic psychotherapists are missing or weak from early in life. In other words, autism may draw attention to the nature and implications of foundational interpersonal processes, not only for social but also for cognitive development. On the one hand, autism is like borderline personality disor- der in being a syndrome, a constellation of clinical features. In autism, the most important are impairments in social relatedness and communication, and in creative flexible thinking (Figure 2). Kanner 9 suggested that the children have an inborn disturbance of affective contact with others. But is it possible that even such striking impairments in thinking and flexibility might stem from primary interpersonal disorder and moreover from disturbances in affective contact? It is indeed the case that autism may not only enable us to see how interpersonal engagement is vital for the development of a broad range of cognitive as well as social abilities, but also that a specific mechanism of social engagement the mechanism of identification described in the writings of Freud plays a critical role. Identification: how might evidence about identification, or the lack of it, emerge from experimental studies of children with autism? Hobson and Lee 10 tested matched groups of 919-year- old children with and without autism for their ability to imitate a person demonstrating four novel goal-directed actions on objects in two contrasting styles. In one condition, the demonstrator made a toy policeman-on-wheels move along by pressing down on its head either with his wrist cocked or with extended index and middle fingers. The results were as follows: the children with autism were perfectly able to copy the demonstrators actions, for example in pressing down the policemans head to make him move. How- ever, they contrasted with control participants insofar as very few adopted the demonstrators style of acting upon the objects. Instead 2 The syndrome of autism Qualitative impairment in social interaction Impaired eye gaze, gestures, facial expressions Failure to share experiences, or develop relationships with peers Qualitative impairment in communication Delayed and idiosyncratic language development Inability to sustain conversation Restricted patterns of interests and activities Inflexible adherence to routines and rituals Repetitive motor mannerisms of adopting the wrist or two-finger approach to activating the toy, for example, most of them pressed down on the policemans head with the palm of a hand. Therefore, there seemed to be a contrast between childrens ability to observe and copy intended actions per se relatively intact in autism and the propensity to identify with and thereby imitate a persons expressive mode of relating to objects and events in the world. Another feature of the results distinguished between participants with and without autism. One condition involved the demonstrator holding a pipe-rack against his own shoulder in order to strum it with a stick, either harshly or gently. A substantial majority of the control participants identified with the demonstrator and posi- tioned the pipe-rack against their own shoulders before strumming it. By contrast, most of the children with autism positioned it at a distance in front of them, on the table. They failed to imitate the other persons self-orientated action in such a way that the action became orientated to their own (rather than the copied persons) self. Moreover, participants who copy the self/other-orientation of actions are also more likely to direct sharing looks (but not checking or orientating looks) to the tester. It seems there is a quality of interpersonal engagement that entails being moved into the position of the person-related-to, and in which one identifies with the others subjective state and makes this ones own, that is relatively lacking in children with autism. Intersubjective engagement is pivotal for development Autism is revealing what psychotherapists have long claimed to be the case. In order to be able to think, one needs to be able to relate to other people as whole, independent sources of attitude. Both self-reflective awareness and creative symbolic thinking are intimately tied up with interpersonal processes, and in particular, being able to relate to other peoples relations with oneself and the world. When such processes are impaired, a relative lack of self-consciousness and concrete, inflexible thinking may result. Children with autism are often oblivious to the effect they have on others, and relatively empty when it comes to seeing themselves in relation to other people. They are often unable to symbolize in play, and what symbolic play they do produce is mostly sterile and repetitive, just as their language is often restricted in flexibility and sensitivity to context. The developmental psychopathology of autism is thus far more relevant to psychotherapy than one might suppose: it is showing us the pivotal role of truly intersubjective relations, and the role of identification within those relations, in human cognitive as well as social development. Conclusion From the outset, psychodynamic psychotherapy has been at the cutting edge of an approach that now enjoys the rather grand title of developmental psychopathology. More recently, research that employs investigative techniques quite different from those of psychoanalysis, but that follows the tradition of drawing typical and atypical development into close relation with one another, has begun to provide new evidence for certain specifically psy- chodynamic concepts (such as identification) and claims about the patterning of mental life in cases of psychopathology. In this domain there is mutual enrichment between psychotherapy and developmental research. PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES 2005 The Medicine Publishing Company Ltd 24 PSYCHIATRY 4:5 REFERENCES 1 Freud S. Mourning and Melancholia (1917). In: Strachey J, ed. Standard Edition of the Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth, 1957. 2 Klein M. Notes on some schizoid mechanisms. Int J Psychoanal 1946; 27: 99110. 3 Patrick M, Hobson R P, Castle D, Howard R, Maughan B. Personality disorder and the representation of early social experience. Dev Psychopathol 1994; 6: 37588. 4 Hobson R P, Patrick M P H, Valentine J D. Objectivity in psychoanalytic judgements. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 173: 1727. 5 Hobson R P, Patrick M P H, Crandell L, Garcia-Perez R, Lee A. Personal relatedness and attachment in infants of mothers with borderline personality disorder. Dev Psychopathol; in press. 6 van Ijzendoorn M H, Schuengel C, Bakermans-Kranenburg M J. Disorganized attachment in early childhood: meta-analysis of precursors, concomitants, and sequelae. Dev Psychopathol 1999; 11: 22549. 7 Mahler M S. On Human Symbiosis and the Vicissitudes of Individuation. Madison, CT: International Universities Press, 1968. 8 Sigman M D, Kasari C, Kwon J H, Yirmiya N. Responses to the negative emotions of others by autistic, mentally retarded and normal children. Child Dev 1992; 63: 796807. 9 Kanner L. Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Nerv Child 1943; 2: 21749. 10 Hobson R P, Lee A. Imitation and identification in autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1999; 40: 64959. FURTHER READING Hobson P. The Cradle of Thought. London: Pan Macmillan, 2002. (A book that fills out the arguments and evidence of this contribution.) Practice points A great deal can be learnt about the origins of psychopathology from considering typical and atypical development in relation to one another There are new sources of evidence for psychodynamic processes that characterize certain forms of personality disorder The study of autism sheds light on how development of the mind depends on interpersonal experiences, and identification between young children and other people Research on the transmission of psychological difficulties from parents to their infants promises to elucidate sources of psychopathology early in life