Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
PROPAGATION
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 1
Prerequisites for EMG4066
• Please drop this subject if you have not taken (or pass):
– ECT1026 – Field Theory.
– EMG2016 – Electromagnetic Theory.
– PEM1026 - Engineering mathematics II.
– PEM2036 - Engineering mathematics III.
• Assumed prior knowledge:
– Mathematics – Vector calculus, know what is gradient, divergence,
curl, Stoke’s Theorem, Divergence Theorem.
– Electrostatics – Coulomb’s Law, electric field, electric charge
distribution, electric potential, Gauss’ Law.
– Magnetostatic – Lorentz’s Force Law, Biot-Savart Law, magnetic
vector potential, Ampere’s Law, Faraday’s Law.
– Electrodynamics – Maxwell’s equations in time-domain and
frequency-domain (time-harmonic forms), uniform plane waves
propagation, refraction, reflection.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 2
EMG4066 Main Topics
• Antenna Basics (Dr Fabian Kung) (1.5 - 2 weeks).
• Antenna Types (Dr Fabian Kung) (0.5-1 week).
• Antenna Arrays (Mr Gobi Vetharatnam) (1 week).
• Introduction to RADAR systems (Mr Gobi Vetharatnam)
(1 week).
• Radio wave propagation (Dr Deepak Kumar) (2 weeks).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 3
Main References/Textbooks
• C. A. Balanis, “Antenna theory – analysis and design”, 3rd edition,
2005, John-Wiley & Sons.
• W. Tomasi, “Electronic communication systems – fundamental through
advanced”, 5th edition, 2003, Prentice Hall.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 4
EMG4066 Assessment
• Lab 10% (AP1 – Antenna measurements, AP2 – Radar
measurements at Applied Electromagnetic Lab, Level 3,
FOE Building).
• Assignment 15%.
• Mid-term test 15% (30 Nov 2009, 7-8pm, covers antenna
basics to antenna array).
• Final 60% (covers all topics).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 5
Antenna Basics
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 6
References
• MAIN REFERENCES:
• [1] D. K. Cheng, “Field and waves electromagnetic”, 2nd edition, 1989,
Addison-Wesley.
• [2] C. A. Balanis, “Antenna theory – analysis and design”, 3rd edition,
2005, John-Wiley & Sons.
• OTHER REFERENCES:
• [3] J. D. Kraus, “Antenna for all applications”, 2001, McGraw-Hill.
• [4] S. Ramo, J. R. Whinnery, T. Van Duzer, “Field and waves in
communication electronics”, 3rd edition, 1993, John-Wiley & Sons.
• [5] Pass year EMG4066 notes.
• [6] R. E. Collins, “Foundation for microwave engineering”, 2nd edition,
1992, McGraw-Hill.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 7
Agenda
1. Definitions, usage and types of antenna.
2. A quick review of Maxwell’s Equations.
3. Mechanism of electromagnetic (EM) radiation.
4. Finding the EM fields for antenna 1 - Potential theory for EM fields.
5. Finding the EM fields for antenna 2 - Dynamic EM fields from elemental
electric dipole and magnetic dipole.
6. Finding the EM fields for antenna 3 – Radiation Integrals and Radiated
EM fields for wire antenna.
7. Antenna in transmit mode - Radiated power density, radiation intensity
and antenna pattern.
8. More antenna parameters – Directivity, beam solid angle, gain, antenna
equivalent circuit.
9. Antenna in receiving mode and Reciprocity Theorem – Antenna
effective area.
10. Friis transmission formula for transmit/receive system.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 8
1. Definitions, Usage and
Types of Antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 9
What is an Antenna?
• An antenna is...
• That part of a transmitting system that is designed to generate
propagating electromagnetic (EM) waves in free space.
• The same structure can also be used to convert propagating
electromagnetic waves in free space into voltage and current at the
antenna terminals.
• A transducer between a guided wave propagating in a transmission line
and an electromagnetic wave propagating in an unbounded medium
(usually free space), or vice versa.
• Any conducting structure can launch/generate EM waves – or radiate –
but when the “structure” is designed to radiate efficiently with
directional and polarization properties suitable for the intended
application – that “structure” is called an antenna.
• An antenna can include purely metallic, purely dielectric or hybrid
structures.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 10
Usage of Antenna (1)
Horn antenna
connected to
rectangular
waveguide
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 11
Usage of Antenna (2)
• A pair of antenna used in a transmit/receive system, i.e. a wireless
communication system.
Electromagnetic
Antenna (EM) fields
I1
I2
V1 V2
TX RX
Far fields
Near fields
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 12
Types of Radiating Structures (Antennas)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 13
Types of Antenna (1)
I1 Monople antenna
V1
Proprietary
RF chipset
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 14
Types of Antenna (2)
I1 Dipole antenna
Folded dipole
V1
antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 15
Types of Antenna (3)
I1
Fractal patch
V1 antenna
Microstrip patch
Coaxial to waveguide
antenna adapter
I1 Rectangular
waveguide Slot antenna
V1
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 16
Types of Antenna (4)
I1
V1
Horn antennas
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 17
Types of Antenna (5)
V1
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 18
Types of Antenna (6)
Microstrip line
Folded dipole
antenna
Microstrip
patch antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 19
Types of Antenna (7)
Microstrip array
Front
Back
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 20
Types of Antenna (8)
Ceramic chip
antenna
Bluetooth chipset
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 21
Reasons for the Wide Variety of
Antenna Types
• Operating frequency.
• Power level (maximum voltage and current).
• Efficiency.
• Bandwidth or operating frequency range.
• Cost.
• Size.
• Gain.
• Technology.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 22
2. A Quick Review of
Maxwell’s Equations
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 23
Review of Scalar and Vector Notations
• Suppose we have a variable, call it A.
• If A is a scalar, we would just write as A.r
• If A is a vector, we would write as A or A .
• If A is a unit vector (a vector with a magnitude of 1), we would write as  .
• In 3D Cartesian coordinate system, A and  would be defined as
follows: x-component magnitude Magnitude of A
z r ) ) ) 2+A 2+A 2
Az A = Ax x + A y y + Az z A = Ax y z
A vector
A as depicted
in Cartesian
Unit vector along x-axis
coordinate ) ) ) Note: some books,
A Ax x + A y y + Az z
system Aˆ = like the textbook
A will use ax to denote
Ax 0 Ay = 1 )
( ) )
Ax x + Ay y + Az z ) unit vector in x-axis,
and similar notation
Ax 2 + A y 2 + Az 2 for unit vectors in y
x y and z-axis.
r
Another way to portray A: A = AAˆ = Aa A
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 24
Maxwell’s Equations (1)
• How the physical quantities of electric charge q, electric current I,
electric field E and magnetic field B (EM fields) behave and react in
space are dictated by a set of natural laws called the Maxwell’s
Equations.
• Maxwell’s Equations can be expressed in differential or integral form.
In differential form we use charge density ρv and current density J
instead of q and I. In this chapter we will predominantly use Maxwell’s
Equations in differential form.
• In either differential or integral form, the parameters in Maxwell’s
Equations are expressed as time-domain functions, since electric
charge q, electric current I, E and B fields can change with time (e.g.
they are function of time t) and location.
• However in linear dielectric medium, when the parameters dependency
on time is in sinusoidal form, the parameters can be expressed in time-
harmonic form, where the electric charge, electric current, E and B
fields are expressed as complex exponent in time or phasors.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 25
Maxwell’s Equations (2)
• Maxwell’s Equations tells us that the presence of electric charge
causes electric field (E) to appear in the surrounding space. It also tells
us that the presence of moving electric charge (current) produces
magnetic field (B) in the surrounding space.
• From the Lorentz Force Law, the electric field in turn produces a force
on electric charge and the magnetic field in turn produces a force on
moving electric charge.
• Finally Maxwell’s Equations also describe the phenomenon of
induction, in which time-varying electric field induces magnetic field,
and time-varying magnetic field induces electric field.
• These effects are summed up in 4 differential equations involving E, B,
q and I (or ρv and J).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 26
Maxwell Equations (Linear Medium) - Time-
Domain Form (1)
Each parameter depends on 4 independent variables
Faraday’s law r
Where: E = E x (x, y, z , t )xˆ + E y (x, y, z , t ) yˆ + E z (x, y, z , t )zˆ
r ∂
r r
∇ × E = − B (2.1a) H = H x (x, y, z , t )xˆ + H y (x, y, z , t ) yˆ + H z (x, y, z , t )zˆ
∂t r
r r ∂ r J = J x (x, y, z , t )xˆ + J y (x, y, z , t ) yˆ + J z (x, y, z , t )zˆ
∇ × H = J + D (2.1b) ρ v = ρ v ( x, y , z , t )
∂t
r Modified Ampere’s law Unit vector in x-direction
∇ ⋅ D = ρv Gauss’s law (2.1c)
x component In Cartesian coordinate system
xˆ yˆ zˆ
∂ = ∂E z − ∂E y ∂E x ∂E z ∂E y ∂E x
r
∇× E = ∂ ∂ xˆ + − yˆ + ∂x − ∂y zˆ
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂y ∂z ∂z ∂x
Ex Ey Ez
Gradient
Divergence ∂t
(
= − ∂ Bx x + B y yˆ + Bz zˆ ) ) )
∇F = ∂F x + ∂F yˆ + ∂F z
∂x ∂y ∂z
r ∂E x ∂E y ∂E z r r
ρ v If you still remember Vector Calculus, lim ∆V →0 1 ∫∫ E ⋅ ds
∇⋅E = + + = the Divergence is the limit of this operation: ∆V ∆S
∂x ∂y ∂z ε
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 28
Maxwell Equations (Linear Medium) - Time-
Domain Form (3)
• The physical meaning of Maxwell’s Equations:
Surface
Faraday’s Law : Integral form integration
r r r r ∂
r r B
∂
∇× E = − B ∫ E ⋅ dl = −
∂t ∫∫ B ⋅ ds
Differential form
∂t C Line S
integration Induced
This means circular electric field E can E field
be created by time-varying magnetic (circular)
field (the magnetic field changes in value and direction)
Modified Ampere’s Law:
r r r r r r ∂
r r I
∂
∇× H = J +ε E
∂t
∫ H ⋅ d l = I + ε
∂t ∫∫ E ⋅ ds E
Differential form C Integral form S conductor
θ
Magnitude Phase 2π
ω
• This can be expressed as complex exponent via Euler’s formula:
e jα = cos α + j sin α Phasor
We normally use small letter
and italic font to represent
time-domain variable { } {
v1 (t ) = Re Vo e j (ωt +θ ) = Re Vo e jθ e jωt }
• The term V1 = Vo e jθ is called the phasor, or time-harmonic form.
• Similarly, given a phasor, we can obtain the time-domain form as follows:
– Multiply the phasor with e jωt .
– Take the real part of the product.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 31
Review of Phasor (2)
• Why use phasor ?
• In many engineering problems we are only interested in the steady-
state sinusoidal response of a linear system, which can be conveniently
represented in phasor form.
• Moreover using the phasor notation simplifies the integral-differential
equations describing a physical system.
• In particular the differentiation and integration with respect to time t
becomes multiplication and division with jω respectively in phasor.
Time-domain ∂v → jωV Phasor/time-harmonic 1 V
quantity
∂t quantity ∫ vdt →
jω
• For more discussion on the theory of phasor analysis and Fourier
Transform, consult your pass year notes and textbooks on circuit and
signal analysis.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 32
Review of Phasor (3)
• Vector quantity such as E and H fields, J can also be expressed as
phasors provided all their components’ time dependency are
sinusoidal.
• For example for a sinusoidal E field:
r
E(x, y, z, t ) =
)
Ex (x, y, z)cos(ωt +θ )xˆ + Ey (x, y, z)cos(ωt +θ ) y + Ez (x, y, z)cos(ωt +θ )zˆ
• The
r phasor is given by:
E ( x, y , z )
Re E y e jθ e jωt{ }
= E (x, y , z )e jθ xˆ + E (x, y, z )e jθ y + E (x, y, z )e jθ zˆ
x y z
) ) )
= Ex x + E y y + Ez z
Normally straight and capital letter is used to represent phasor
• Notice that the phasor now depends on (x,y,z) only (it can also
depends on frequency ω), and it is also a vector.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 33
Maxwell Equations (Linear Medium) - Time-
Harmonic Form (1)
• For sinusoidal variations with time t, we substitute the phasors for E, H, J
and ρ into Maxwell’s Equations, the result are Maxwell’s Equations in
time-harmonic form. Where: r
Each parameter depends on 3 independent variables
∂ → jω E = E x (x, y, z )xˆ + E y (x, y, z ) yˆ + E z (x, y, z )zˆ
∂t r
r r H = H x (x, y, z )xˆ + H y (x, y, z ) yˆ + H z (x, y, z )zˆ
Faraday’s Law ∇ × E = − jωB (2.2a) r
r r r J = J x (x, y, z )xˆ + J y (x, y, z ) yˆ + J z (x, y, z )zˆ
Modified
Ampere’s Law ∇ × H = J + jωD (2.2b) ρ v = ρ v (x, y, z ) E – Electric field intensity
r
H – Auxiliary magnetic field
Gauss’s Law ∇ ⋅ D = ρ v (2.2c) D – Electric flux
Gauss’s Law
r B – Magnetic field intensity
for magnetic ∇⋅B = 0 (2.2d) J – Current density
field
ρv- Volume charge density
Constitutive εo – permittivity of free space
relations (≅8.85412×10-12)
µo – permeability of free space
(4π×10-7)
εr – relative permittivity
For linear medium µr – relative permeability
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 34
3. Mechanism of
Electromagnetic (EM)
Radiation
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 35
Self-Sustaining EM Fields
• Maxwell’s Equations show that time-varying E field can induce
solenoidal H field.
• Similarly time-varying H field will induce solenoidal E field.
• It is this symmetry nature of time-varying EM fields which result in self-
sustaining EM field in free space. When the variation with respect to
time is sinusoidal, this self-sustaining EM field is usually called a
propagating EM wave or radiowave.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 36
Example 3.1 – Radiation from Dipole
Antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 37
Example 3.2 – Radiation from Horn
Antenna Driven by Rectangular Waveguide
• To be shown during lecture (hand-drawn).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 38
4. Finding the EM fields for
Antenna 1 - Potential Theory
for Electromagnetic fields
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 39
Introduction
• In the last section we only explain the possibility of generating a self-
sustaining EM fields from time-varying currents in an antenna.
• In this section systematic procedures for finding the approximate
expressions for the electric and magnetic fields from an antenna is
presented.
• From our knowledge of Maxwell’s Equations, it is obvious that to find
the EM fields, we need to know how the current and charge are
distributed and change with time in an antenna.
• However to find the EM fields directly via Maxwell’s Equations in it’s
original form is difficult, since E and H fields being vectors, has three
components each, that brings the total unknowns to six.
• A more systematic approach to finding the E and H fields is to write the
fields in terms of a auxiliary (or secondary) quantity, traditionally called
potentials. Express the potentials in terms of charge and current, and
obtain the EM fields from the potentials.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 40
Maxwell’s Equations Under Static Condition (1)
• In static case the EM fields, J and ρv are constant with respect to time t,
they are no longer function of time, i.e. frequency is zero, ω = 0.
r r
E ( x , y , z , t ) → E ( x, y , z )
• Maxwell’s Equations under static condition degenerate to the following
form: r
r r Electrostatics
∇ × E = − j ωB ∇×E = 0 r
r r r For linear medium r r ∇ × E = 0 (4.1a)
∇ × H = J + jωD with ω → 0 ∇×H = J r
r
∇ ⋅ D = ρv
r
∇ ⋅ D = ρv
( )
∇ ⋅ εE = ρ v (4.1b)
r r
∇⋅B = 0 ∇⋅B = 0 Magnetostatics
r r
We observe that: ∇ × H = J (4.2a)
• There is a symmetry between the Electrostatics and r
Magnetostatics equations. ( )
∇ ⋅ µH = 0 (4.2b)
•The E and H fields are no longer interconnected
(decoupled).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 41
Electrostatic, Charge and Scalar Potential
(1)
• We have learnt in field theory and basic EM theory that under
electrostatic condition, an auxiliary quantity called Electric Potential (V)
can be defined, and it is related to electric field E.
Electric potential Poisson’s Equation for
(Energy needed to bring
Electrostatic (under linear
1 Coulomb of positive r
charge from a reference point E = −∇V (4.3) homogeneous medium)
to the observation point
under electric field) 2 ρv Electrostatics
r r ∇ V=− εo in terms of V
Electrostatics
V = −∫ E ⋅ d l (4.4)
r
∇×E = 0
V(R ) = ∫∫∫
1 ρv '
r dv
( )
∇ ⋅ εE = ρ v
4πε o
Volume D
r
Potential at observation
point, reference at Solution to Poisson’s
infinity Equation
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 42
Electrostatic, Charge and Scalar
Potential (2)
• A diagram should clear up any confusion with regards to the notations
of finding electric potential V from a given charge distribution.
V(R ) = ∫∫∫
1 ρv '
R r 4πε o r dv
Volume D
ρv(r’)
r’ A distribution of
electric charge, ρv
Volume D
x
y
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 43
Magnetostatic, Current and Vector
Potential (1)
• In a similar manner we have also learnt that static magnetic field can also
be expressed in terms of another auxiliary quantity, called magnetic
vector potential A.
Magnetic vector
r r potential
H = µ1 ∇ × A Vector Poisson
(4.5) Equation for A
r r r r r r
Magnetostatics ∫ A ⋅ d l = ∫∫ µH ⋅ d s
Closed surface S
2
∇ A = −µ o J
r
( )
∇ ⋅ µH = 0 (4.6)
r r r r
A(R ) = ∫∫∫
µo
∇×H = J
4π
J
r dv '
Volume
Solution to vector Poisson’s
Equation
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 44
Magnetostatic, Current and Vector
Potential (2)
• Similar to Electrostatic we can find the vector potential A from a given
current distribution.
J(r’)
r’
A distribution of
electric current, J
Volume D
x
y
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 45
Summary- Potentials in Electrostatics
and Magnetostatics
• From electrostatics and magnetostatics we have seen that E and H
fields can be expressed in terms of potentials, called scalar potential V
and vector potential A respectively.
r
E = −∇V (4.3)
r r r r
B = ∇×A or H = µ1 ∇ × A (4.5)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 47
Potentials in Electrodynamics (2)
• Therefore under electrodynamics E and H can be expressed as:
r r
E = −∇V − jωA (4.8a)
Potentials formulation
r r in electrodynamics
H = µ1 ∇ × A (4.8b)
• As usual V and A are the scalar and vector potentials respectively, but
these now apply to a system with electric charge and electric current
that varies with time, e.g. in a sinusoidal fashion.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 48
Wave Equations for Potentials (1)
• Also recall that under electrostatics and magnetics both V and A fulfill
the scalar and vector versions of the Poisson Equations, repeated
again: 2 ρv
∇ V=− ε (4.4)
r
2
r
∇ A = −µJ (4.6)
• This can be extended to electrodynamics condition. For instance
putting (4.8a) for E into Gauss’s Law of Maxwell’s Equations:
r r
( ) (
∇ ⋅ εE = ε∇ ⋅ − ∇V − jωA = ρ v
r
)
( )
⇒ ∇ V + jω ∇ ⋅ A = − 1ε ρ v
2
(4.9a)
This is a 2nd order linear partial
differential equation.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 49
Wave Equations for Potentials (2)
• In a similar manner using the modified Ampere’s Law in Maxwell’s
Equations, a ‘constraint’ for A in the form of 2nd order PDE can be
obtained:
r r r r
( 2 2
) (
∇ A + µεω A − ∇ ∇ ⋅ A + jµεωV = −µJ ) (4.9b)
• As usual we observed that (4.9a) and (4.9b) are coupled PDEs,
containing both A and V terms. We would like to decouple them.
• At this juncture we should pause and ponder the reason we use
potential formulation. Note that we manage to reduce the complexity of
the problem slightly, instead of 6 parameters (3 each for E and H fields
in 3D space), we manage to reduce the unknown parameters to 4 (3 for
A and 1 for V in 3D space).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 50
Wave Equations for Potentials (3)
• Now take note that equations (4.8a) and (4.8b) do not uniquely define
V and A. We are free to impose extra conditions on V and A as long
as nothing happens to E and H.
• The extra conditions on V and A are called Gauge Transformation (see
reference books for more info).
• Here I just wish draw your attention to a theory on vector field, the
Hemholtz Theorem which states that to uniquely define a vector field (A
in this case), one needs to define both it’s divergence and curl.
• Here we have already define the curl of A in (4.8b). Now let’s impose
further condition on A, in the form of: r
∇ ⋅ A = − jωµεV (4.10)
This is called the Lorentz’s Gauge,
note that many type of gauge can be defined.
r
For example ∇ ⋅ A = 0 is called the
Coulomb’s Gauge.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 51
Wave Equations for Potentials (4)
• With the Lorentz’s Gauge, equations (4.9a) and (4.9b) can be
decoupled and we finally obtained the following PDEs for the potentials
under electrodynamics condition:
2 2
∇ V + k V = − ε1 ρ v (4.11a)
2
r 2
r r
∇ A + k A = − µJ (4.11b)
r
∇ ⋅ A = − jωµεV (4.11c)
and k = ω µε (4.11d)
• The above is what we called the Wave Equations for Potentials in
Electrodynamics.
• Note with the Lorentz Gauge, E and H fields can be specified entirely in
vector potential A. r r r
jω
E = − k 2 ∇ ∇ ⋅ A − jωA ( )
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 52
Solutions for Wave Equations for
Potentials (1)
• Now we would like to know the solutions for wave equations (4.11a)
and (4.11b).
• Here we do not have the space to outline the procedures of finding the
expressions for V and A that fulfill equations (4.11).
• The motivated reader can refer to the standard electromagnetic books
or to the excellence texts by:
– [4], Chapter 12.
– C.A. Balanis, “Advanced engineering electromagnetics”, 1989 John
Wiley or [2].
– [1], Chapter 7 (this is presented in time-domain).
• In summary, the solution to (4.11) for V and A, expressed in terms of
charge and current density can be obtained using “Green Function
Theorem” for Partial Differential Equations (PDE).
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 53
Solutions for Wave Equations for
Potentials (2)
• The solutions to (4.11) for dynamic case are quite similar in form to the
Electrostatic and Magnetostatic case: Note that under static
ρ v (r ') condition, (1.9a) and
V ( x, y , z ) = ∫∫∫ (4.12a)
1 − jkr
4πε r e dv' (1.9b) reduced to the
solutions for electrostatics
r r
J (r ')
and magnetostatics.
A ( x, y , z ) = ∫∫∫
µ − jkr
4π r e dv' (4.12b)
• Contrast (4.12a) and (4.12b) with the expressions for V and A for
electrostatics and magnetostatics.
• In time-domain (4.12a) and (4.12b) can be expressed as:
ρ v (r ',t − cr )
V ( x, y , z , t ) = 1
4πε ∫∫∫ r r dv' (4.13a)
These are called the
r J (r ',t − cr ) Retarded Potentials
A( x, y, z , t ) = ∫∫∫
µ
4π r dv' (4.13b)
Integration z
domain for dv’ Observation point
P(x,y,z)
R r
ρ v (r ' )
ρv(r’)
V ( x, y , z ) = 4πε
1
∫∫∫ r e − jkr dv'
r’ A distribution of
electric charge, ρv or
ρ v (r ',t − cr )
x
y
V ( x, y , z , t ) = 4πε
1
∫∫∫ r dv'
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 55
Main Ideas
• What equations (4.12a) and (4.12b) say is that if we know the charge
and current distribution in a system, we can predict the potentials and
subsequently the electromagnetic fields at any observation point.
• When there is a change in the charge or current distribution, this will
affect the potentials/fields at the observation point. However the affect
will not be immediate, but delayed by a factor of r/c in time-domain or kr
in frequency domain for each point source.
• We can explain this physically by noting that a ‘signal’ cannot travel
faster than the speed-of-light.
• Thus in general, if we know the charge and current in a structure,
we can predict the EM fields with time retardation taken into
account, and this is the basis of finding the radiating fields from
an antenna.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 56
5. Finding the EM fields for
Antenna 2 - Dynamic EM
Fields from Elemental
Electric Dipole and
Magnetic Dipole
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 57
Short Electric Dipole
• Consider a Short Electric Dipole (since this structure produce mainly
electric field in it’s vicinity) with oscillating current flowing along it’s axis.
Electric charges exist at both ends to fulfill the charge continuity principle.
• The short, or elemental electric dipole is also called a Hertzian dipole, and
it is a form of antenna.
“Short” here means ∆l < 0.1λ
+ Point charges at
both ends, ±q(t). Q∆l = Electric dipole moment
∆l
Electric current flows uniformly
- along conductor, which is very thin, i(t).
i (t ) = I o cos(ωt ) or I = I oe j 0 (5.1a)
Io
i (t ) = ± dq
or Q=±
dt
jω (5.1b)
Time-domain Frequency-domain
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 58
Potentials for Elemental Electric Dipole
• Consider an elemental electric dipole oriented as shown. From (4.12),
the potentials at the observation point is then given by:
z ∆l = ∆z
P(observation point)
r
R r
A(R ) = ( )zˆ = A zˆ (5.2a)
µI o ∆z e − jkr
4π r z
r1 r2 V (R ) = Q
4πε
( )− ( ) (5.2b)
e − jkr1
r1
Q
4πε
e − jkr2
r2
NOTE:
r’ The parameters r1 and r2 can be expressed
Elemental
electric dipole in terms of r, ∆z. We will not do that now
as potential V can be written in terms of A
(4.10), so it is not needed. We will see very
x soon that V is not needed at all as the
y elemental electric dipole is normally not
used alone.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 59
EM Fields from Elemental Electric Dipole
• For simplicity assume that r’=0, thus R = r and the dipole is at the center
of the origin.
• The vector potential A can be written in spherical coordinate system as:
r z
A(r , θ , φ ) = Ar rˆ + Aθ θˆ + Aφφˆ
= ( Az cos θ )rˆ + (− Az sin θ )θˆ
P
• Using the relation between A and H, at point P: θ
r r
H(r ) = µ1 ∇ × A (5.3a) r
Instantaneous
E field
Vertical
Plane
• In between reactive near field and far field is the radiating near field.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 62
Near and Far Fields (2)
No abrupt changes in
Radiating near
the field
field (Fresnel)
configurations are
region (kr > 1)
Rnear noted as the
boundaries are
Antenna crossed – but there
Rfar are distinct
differences between
the fields
Reactive near field
region (kr << 1)
Far field (Fraunhofer) region
(kr >> 1)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 63
Near and Far Fields (3)
• For reactive near field:
r
H (r ) ≅ − I4o π∆z k 2 sin θ [ ]φˆ 1
( jkr )2
(5.5a)
r
E (r ) ≅ − I4o π∆z ηk 2 2 cos θ [ ]rˆ −1
( jkr )3
I o ∆z
4π ηk 2 sin θ [ ]θˆ
1
( jkr )3 (5.5b)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 64
Why Consider Elemental Electric Dipole?
Long
thin
conductor
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 65
Elemental Magnetic Dipole
• A current loop is called a Magnetic Dipole (because it produce
magnetic field mainly). If the loop area is very small, it is called
elemental magnetic dipole.
• When the current within the magnetic dipole is time-varying, the
resulting H field in it’s vicinity is also time-varying and this induces a
propagating EM wave. z
Current Observation
loop with θ point P
area a
Io r
x φ
y
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 66
EM Fields for Elemental Magnetic Dipole
• Using similar procedures, e.g. finding the A of the current loop, and
then using expressions (4.8a) and (4.8b) with reasonable
approximation, one can show that the far-field E and H for the
elemental magnetic dipole are given by [1]:
r
H (r ) ≅ − ωµ4πηo m sin θ [ kr ]e − jkrθˆ (5.7a) Area
r m = Ioa
E (r ) ≅ ωµ4πo m k sin θ [1r ]e − jkrφˆ (5.7b)
r
E (r )far -field Magnetic dipole
• As in the electric dipole, r =η moment
H (r )far -field
• Examination of (5.6) and (5.7) reveals that electric and magnetic dipole
have the same pattern function and are in both space and time
quadrature. This means it is possible to combine electric and magnetic
dipoles to form an antenna that produces circular polarization EM
wave.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 67
Concluding Remarks
• Every antenna structure can be decomposed into many short electric
and magnetic dipoles.
• Thus understanding the EM field of these elemental radiating structures
is important.
• Due to time constraint, we shall not discuss much on elemental
magnetic dipole. We shall only consider in detail antenna whose
structure can be decomposed into many elemental electric dipole.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 68
6. Finding the EM fields for
Antenna 3 - Radiation
Integrals and Radiated EM
Fields for Wire Antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 69
EM Fields from General Wire
Structures (1)
• Consider a long conductor oriented along z direction.
• By segmenting it into short segments of ∆l, the total EM fields can be
written using superposition principle and (5.3a), (5.3b):
z
θ1
segment 1 r1 P
Long r2
segment 2
r3
thin segment 3
conductor r
k2
N
H (P ) ≅ − 4π ∑ I oi sin θ i
i =1
[ 1
jkri
]
+ ( jkr1 )2 e − jkri ∆z φˆ
i
∆z r ηk 2
N
i =1
1
i
[
E (P ) ≅ − 2π ∑ I oi cos θ i ( jkr )2 + ( jkr )3 e ∆z rˆ
1
i
− jkri
]
2
N
i =1
1
[
− 4π ∑ I oi sin θ i jkri + ( jkr )2 + ( jkr )3 e ∆z θ
ηk 1
i
1
i
− jkri ˆ
]
segment N
0
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 70
EM Fields from General Wire
Structures (2)
• In the limit when N→∞ or ∆z→0, the summation operation becomes
integration: We need to know
this!
r
H ( P ) = − 4π
k2
{∫ I (z )sin(θ (z ))[
L
0
o
1
jkr
] }
+ ( jkr1 )2 e − jkr dz φˆ (6.1a)
r ηk 2
E ( P ) ≅ − 2π {∫ I (z )cos(θ (z ))[
0
L
o
1
( jkr )2
] }
+ ( jkr1 )3 e − jkr dz rˆ (6.1b)
− ηk 2
4π
{∫ I (z )sin(θ (z ))[
0
L
o
1
jkr
]
+ ( jkr1 )2 + ( jkr1 )3 e − jkr dz θˆ}
• Of course to be able to use equations (6.1a) and (6.1b) effectively to
predict the EM fields created by a thin, long conductor, we need
information of the electric current distribution along the conductor.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 71
Far Field for General Wire Structures
• In general we are more interested in the far EM field for a structure, as
the far field represents the radiation field.
r
H ( P ) = − 4π
k2
{∫ I (z )sin(θ (z ))
0
L
o
1
jkr e − jkr dz φˆ} (6.2a)
Radiation Integrals
r ηk 2
E ( P ) ≅ − 4π {∫ I (z )sin(θ (z ))
0
L
o
1
jkr
}
e − jkr dz θˆ (6.2b)
• The above integral, representing far-field E and H in terms of the
current in the conductor are called the Radiation Integrals.
• An important observation above is that the ratio of |E| over |H| for far
field is a fixed constant, called the Wave Impedance:
r
E (P )
r =η (6.3)
H (P )
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 72
Example 6.1 – Far Field for Dipole
Antenna
• We would like to find the far field for a dipole structure as shown below.
• The determination of the exact current distribution on the dipole
conductors subjected to Maxwell’s Equation is a very difficult boundary
value problem even if the wire is assumed to be perfectly conducting.
• Usually numerical method like Method of Moments (MoM) and Finite
Element Method (FEM) is employed to find the exact current distribution
(see [2]). z
Dipole
h
i(t)
x
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 73
Example 6.1 Cont…
• For our purposes the knowledge of the exact current distribution on the
linear antenna is not of prime importance. A good estimate will give us
considerable useful information on the radiation characteristics of the
antenna.
• Here we assume a sinusoidal current distribution on a very thin, straight
dipole. Such a current distribution constitutes a type of standing wave
over the dipole and is a good approximation.
z Common sense tells
I (z ) = I m sin k (h − z ) us that current magnitude
must be large here and
Current
approach zero at the tips
phasor I m sin k (h − z ) z > 0 of the conductor
=
I m sin k (h + z ) z < 0
i(t)
x
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 74
Example 6.1 Cont…
• Using (6.2b): r ηk 2
E ( P ) ≅ − 4π {∫ −h
h
I ( z )sin (θ ( z )) jkr
1
}
e − jkr dz θˆ
h I sin (k (h − z ))sin (θ ( z )) 1 e − jkr dz
ηk 2 ∫0 ˆ
m jkr
= − 4π 0 θ
+ ∫ I m sin (k (h + z ))sin (θ (z )) jkr
1
e − jkr dz
z
−h
P (observation
point)
θ r
i(t) R
z
x
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 75
Example 6.1 Cont…
• The integration is still difficult to perform, we can make further
assumption by noting that since R >> h, the angle θ can be considered
constant along the dipole.
• Furthermore r and R can be assumed to be parallel.
z
r ≅ R − z cos θ
θ r
This term can be ignored
i(t) R without incurring much error
z
x
h sin (k (h − z ))
∫0
1 − jk ( R − z cosθ )
r jk ( R − z cosθ )
e dz ˆ
ηk 2 I m sin θ
E ( P ) ≅ − 4π 0 θ
+ ∫ sin (k (h + z )) jk ( R −1z cosθ ) e − jk ( R − z cosθ )dz
−h
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 76
Example 6.1 Cont…
• Therefore h sin (k (h − z )) 1 e − jk ( R − z cosθ )dz
ηk 2 I m sin θ ∫0
r jkR ˆ
E ( P ) ≅ − 4π 0 θ
+ ∫ sin (k (h + z )) jkR 1
e − jk ( R − z cosθ )dz
−h
h sin (k (h − z ))e jk ( z cosθ )dz
jηkI m sin θ − jkR ∫0 ˆ
= 4πR e 0 θ
+ ∫ sin (k (h + z ))e jk ( z cosθ )dz
−h
= jηkI m sin θ − jkR h
2πR e {∫ 0
sin (k (h − z )) cos(kz cos θ )dz θˆ }
r
E (P ) ≅ [ jηkI m
2πR e − jkR
]{ cos ( kh cosθ )− cos kh
sin θ
}θˆ (6.4a)
• Using (6.3):
r
H (P ) ≅ [ jkI m
2πR e − jkR ]{ cos ( kh cosθ )− cos kh
sin θ
}φˆ (6.4b)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 77
Example 6.1 Cont…
• For the special case of half-wavelength dipole, 2h = λ/2, the far fields
become:
r
( )
E 1 λ P ≅ 2πR e
2
[
jηkI m − jkR cos ( π2 cosθ ) ˆ
sin θ
]{ (6.5a) }θ r
r ) ˆ E (P ) ˆ
H 1 λ (P ) ≅
2
[ jkI m
2πR e − jkR
]{cos ( π2 cosθ
sin θ
}φ = η φ (6.5b)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 78
7. Antenna in Transmit
Mode - Radiated Power
Density, Radiation Intensity
and Radiation/Antenna
Pattern
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 79
Radiated Power Density (S)
• For application involving antenna, we are only interested in the EM
fields at the far-field condition.
• We can see that the E and H fields are perpendicular to each other
under far-field condition, and their vector product produces a positive
power flow from the antenna, according to Poynting Theorem.
• The time-average power density (e.g. power per unit area) of the EM
fields in a direction n (where n is a unit vector) is given by:
r r
{
S = 12 Re E × H * ⋅ nˆ } (7.1)
Denotes complex conjugate
• For antenna, we are usually interested in S at various direction, with n̂
equals to the radial direction in spherical coordinate system.
• When equation (7.1) is applied to far field of a radiating structure with
nˆ = rˆ , the resulting S is called the Radiated Power Density.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 80
Radiated Power Density for Hertzian Dipole
• For the Hertzian Dipole, the radiated power density is given by:
r r
{
S = 12 Re E × H * ⋅ nˆ }
= I o 2 ∆z 2
32π 2
ηk 4
( )Re[(e
(sin θ )2
k 2r 2
− jkr − j π2
e )(
ˆ jkr j π2 ˆ
θ × e e φ ⋅ rˆ )]
= I o 2 ∆z 2ηk 2 (sin θ )2
32π 2
( ) W/m
1
r2
2
• Or
S (θ , φ , r ) = I o 2 ∆z 2ηk 2 (sin θ )2
32π 2 ( ) W/m
1
r2
2 (7.2)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 82
Example 7.1 – Radiation Pattern of
Short Electric Dipole
z S (θ , φ , r ) = S o (r )F (θ , φ ) W/m 2
where
I o2 ∆z 2ηk 2
S o (r ) = F (θ , φ ) = (sin θ )
2
2 2
32π r
θ
When φ is constant
(E-plane pattern)
When θ is π/2
(H-plane pattern)
x φ
y
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 83
E-plane and H-plane
• Is defined only for single linear polarized antenna.
• The radiation pattern that contains the electric field is called the E-plane
cut or E-plane pattern.
• Automatically the other plane, which contains the Magnetic field is
called the H-plane.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 84
Solid Angle
• A Solid Angle is like an angle in 3 dimension. It is defined as shown
below, with a unit of Steradian.
Solid Angle Ω = A
r2
Steradian (4.4)
• A sphere has a solid angle of 4π Steradian.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 85
Radiation Intensity (U) (1)
• In describing the radiation property of the antenna another parameter is
often used to complement the radiated power density S.
• We know that S represents the time-average power per unit area
along the observation direction. It is a scalar quantity.
• A parameter, known as Radiation Intensity (U) can be used in place of
S, it is equivalent to time-average power per unit solid angle along
the radial direction only.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 86
Radiation Intensity (2)
• The radiation intensity U is formally defined as:
= Power
Area = ( Power
Area
)r 2
= r 2
S (θ , φ ) (7.5)
r2
• U (θ,φ) has the benefit of being a scalar quantity AND independent of
observation distance, provided the EM field is in Far-Field mode.
• U (θ,φ) is usually used in place of F(θ,φ) to describe the radiation
pattern of an antenna.
• Here we will use either one, distinguished by their respective symbols.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 87
Total Radiated Power
• The antenna can be considered as at the center of the coordinate,
being enclosed by a sphere.
• The total radiated power (Prad) from an antenna can be computed by
integrating the radiated power density or radiated intensity over all
direction on the sphere. Sphere
Prad = ∫∫ S (r ,θ , φ ) ⋅ dA = ∫∫π U (θ , φ )⋅ dΩ
A sphere enclosing 4 r dA
the antenna
2π π
=∫ ∫ U (θ , φ )sin θdθdφ (7.6) Antenna
0 0
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 88
Example 7.2 – Total Radiated Power by
Hertzian Dipole
• The radiation intensity U of Hertzian Dipole is:
I o 2 ∆z 2ηk 2 (sin θ )2
U (θ , φ ) = 32π 2
W/Steradian
• Thus
2π π
Prad = ∫ ∫ U (θ , φ )sin θdθdφ
0 0
2π π I 2 ∆z 2ηk 2
=∫ ∫ o
32π 2
(sin θ )3 dθdφ
0 0
I o2
=
2
[
80π 2 ( ∆λz )
2
] (7.7)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 89
Exercise 7.1
• (a) Find the radiated power density and radiation intensity of a half-
wave dipole.
• (b) Sketch it’s radiation pattern.
• (c) Also find it’s total radiated power.
Radiated power density and intensity of half-wave dipole, using (6.5a) and (6.5b):
r r*
S dipole = 1
2
(
E × H ⋅ rˆ ≅ ) [ jηkI m
2πR e − jkR
][
− jkI m
2πR e jkR
]{ sin θ
} (θˆ × φˆ ⋅ rˆ)
cos ( π2 cosθ ) 2
⇒ S dipole = 4π 2 R 2
{
ηk 2 I m 2 cos ( π2 cosθ )
sin θ
}2
U dipole = 4π 2
{
ηk 2 I m 2 cos ( π2 cosθ
sin θ
)
} 2
F(θ,φ)
So(R)
ηk 2 I m 2 2π π cos (π cosθ ) 2
2π π
ηk 2 I m 2
⇒ Prad = 1.219 Evaluated using numerical
Oct 2009
2π integration
© Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 90
Exercise 7.1 Cont…
• The radiation pattern of half-wave dipole.
When φ is constant
(E-plane pattern) When θ is π/2
The dotted blue line is the (H-plane pattern)
E-plane pattern for Hertzian
Dipole, for comparison.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 91
Example 7.3 – Radiation Pattern for a Horn
Antenna
3D pattern
This is the spatial
distribution of
power radiated –
Side lobes also called power
pattern
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 92
Major Lobe and Minor Lobe
• Major lobe is also called main lobe.
• Defined as “the radiation lobe containing the direction of maximum
radiation”.
• In certain antennas, such as multi-lobed or split beam antennas,
there may exist more than one major lobe.
• Minor lobe - A radiation lobe in any direction other than that of the
major lobe.
• When its adjacent to the main lobe its called side lobe.
• Side lobe level – maximum relative directivity of the highest side
lobe with respect to the maximum directivity of the antenna.
• Back lobe – refers to a minor lobe that occupies the hemispheres in
a direction opposite to that of the major lobe.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 93
Example of Radiation pattern lobes
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 94
8. More Antenna Parameters
- Directivity, Beam Solid
Angle, Gain, Antenna
Equivalent Circuit.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 95
Directivity
• A commonly used parameter to measure the overall ability of an
antenna to direct radiated power in a given direction is the Directivity.
• Directivity is defined as the ratio of radiation intensity in the direction of
interest over the average radiation intensity.
U (θ , φ ) U (θ , φ ) U (θ , φ )
D(θ , φ ) = = Prad = 4π (8.1)
U average 4π
Prad
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 96
Beam Solid Angle
• Beam Solid Angle (ΩA) is the solid angle through which that all the
power would be radiated if the radiation intensity U equals the
maximum value over the beam area ΩA.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 97
Gain
• Another useful measure describing the directional properties of an
antenna is the Gain. It is defined as [2]:
U (θ , φ ) U (θ , φ )
G (θ , φ ) = Pin
= 4π (8.5)
4π
Pin
where Pin = Total input (accepted)
power into the antenna
U (θ , φ ) U (θ , φ )
G (θ , φ ) = 4π = 4π ≤ D(θ , φ ) (8.6)
Pin Prad + Ploss
• Under lossless condition the Gain and Directivity will be equal.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 98
Radiation Resistance
• A useful measure of the amount of power radiated by an antenna is the
Radiation Resistance (Rrad).
• The Radiation Resistance of an antenna is the value of a hypothetical
resistance that would dissipate an amount of power equal to the
radiated power Prad when the current in the resistance is equal to the
maximum current along the antenna.
• Naturally a high Radiation Resistance is a desirable property for an
antenna.
2π π
Prad = ∫ ∫ U (θ , φ )sin θdθdφ = 12 I m2 Rrad (8.7)
0 0
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 99
Equivalent Circuit for Antenna
• Usually the voltage across the antenna and the current into an antenna
are not in phase. Thus we can model the antenna as a complex
impedance at a particular frequency.
ZA = Antenna impedance
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 100
Example 8.1
• Find the Directivity, maximum Directivity, Beam Solid Angle and
Radiation Resistance for the Hertzian Dipole.
I o 2 ∆z 2ηk 2 (sin θ )2
U (θ , φ ) = Directivity:
32π
I o2 ∆z 2ηk 2
2
Do = D(θ , φ )max = 3 8π
2 ΩA = = 8.378
3
80π 2 2 ∆z 2
Radiation
Resistance Prad = 12 I o2 Rrad = I o2 ∆z 2ηk 2
12π ≅
2
Io ( λ )[ ] Watt
⇒ Rrad = ∆z 2ηk 2
6π ≅ 80π 2
[( ) ]
∆z 2
λ
Ohm
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 101
Exercise 8.1
• Find the Directivity, maximum Directivity, Beam Solid Angle and
Radiation Resistance for the long Dipole (Half-wave dipole).
⇒ GD (θ , φ )dipole = 1.641 [ ]
cos ( π2 cos (θ )) 2
sin θ
Max value is 1
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 102
Polarization of an Antenna
• In a given direction from the antenna, the polarization of the wave
transmitted by the antenna.
• Polarization of a wave describes the shape and locus of the tip of the E
field vector at a given point in space as a function of time.
• General locus is ellipse – elliptically polarized.
• Under certain conditions – ellipse becomes a circle – circular
polarization, or straight line – linear polarization.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 103
Polarization of a Wave
• When E field is traced in clockwise direction – right-hand polarization,
otherwise left-hand polarization.
• Note that polarization rotation is opposite the direction of rotation of E
field as a function of distance at a fixed point in time.
• Common usage is with linear polarization, vertical and horizontal.
• Both antenna and wave polarization must match for maximum power
transfer.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 104
Polarization and Propagation Direction
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 105
Example of Polarization Mismatch
Horizontally
polarized E field Vertically
polarized E field
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 106
Example 8.2 – Classification of
Radiation Pattern
Omni-directional
Omni-directional pattern
Omni-directional pattern
pattern
Directional
pattern
Directional
pattern
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 107
9. Antenna in Receiving
Mode and Reciprocity
Theorem – Antenna
Effective Area.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 108
Reciprocity Theorem for Antenna (1)
• The discussion until now generally implied that the radiating system
was to be used as a transmitting antenna, exciting EM waves in space
from some high frequency energy source.
• The same system useful for transmission are also useful for reception,
and it will be seen that the quantities already calculated (such as the
radiation pattern, directivity, antenna impedance for transmission) are
also the useful parameters in the design of a receiving system.
• In transmitting antenna, a generator is applied at localized terminals,
and waves that are set up propagate in space approximately as
spherical wavefronts.
• In receiving antenna, a wave coming in from a distant transmitter
approximates a portion of a uniform plane wave, and so sets up an
applied electric field on the antenna system, quite different from that
associated with the localized sources in the transmitting case.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 109
Reciprocity Theorem for Antenna (2)
• Reciprocity Theorem for antenna systems provides the ties between
the transmit and receive phenomena and it states that:
– The antenna pattern for reception is identical to that for
transmission.
– The input impedance of the antenna on transmission is the internal
impedance of the equivalent generator representing a receiving
system.
– An Effective Area (Ae) for the receiving antenna can be defined, and
by reciprocity, is related to the Directivity.
• Due to the scope of this subject, we are not able to go in depth into the
proof of the above statements. The Reciprocity Theorem for antenna
originates from the same theorem for EM fields in linear medium (see
[6]).
• The motivated student can refer to references [1], [2] or [4] for more
details.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 110
Reciprocity Theorem for Antenna (3)
• The equivalent circuits for transmit (TX) and receive (RX) antenna.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 111
Transmit and Receive System (1)
• Based on Reciprocity Theorem, and using the equivalent circuit of an
antenna, a transmit/receive (TX/RX) system can be modeled as shown.
I1
I2
To load ZL2
V1 V2
RX
TX
I1 I2
Linear 2-port
V1 ZL2 V2
network
V2 = Z 21 I1 + Z 22 I 2
I1
I2
To load ZL2
V1 V2
TX RX
I1 I2
Z22
+
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 113
Effective Aperture (Ae) (1)
• From the equivalent circuit above for TX/RX system, the power
2
dissipated at load ZL is given by PL = 12 I 2 RL .
• The power removed by the RX antenna can be thought of as an
Effective Area (Ae) multiplied by the average Radiated Power Density
at the antenna.
PR = S average Ae (9.2)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 114
Effective Aperture (Ae) (2)
• The role of TX and RX antenna can be reversed, thus each antenna
has an effective area.
I1
I2
To load ZL2
V1 V2
Forward condition Ae2
RX
TX
I2
I1
To load ZL1
V1 V2
Ae1 Reverse condition
RX
TX
I1 I2
Z11
+
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 115
Ratio of Ae to D
• By considering the equivalent circuit for ‘forward’ and ‘reverse’
condition and using the definition of Ae, we can show that, when the
antenna is matched to the load (i.e. ZL2 = Z22*, ZL1 = Z11*):
Ae1 Ae 2
=
D1 D2 (9.3)
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 116
10. Friis Transmission
Formula for
Transmit/Receive System
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 117
Power Captured by RX Antenna in
TX/RX System
• Consider a RX/TX system, separated by distance R.
• Assume both antenna are at the direction for maximum sensitivity (e.g.
max radiation intensity).
R
I1
I2
To load ZL2
V1 V2
RX
TX
Radiated power density
PRX = Ae 2 S 21 from antenna 1 (TX) to Transmit power
antenna 2 (RX). from Antenna
• Thus S 21 = UR212 U 21 = D1 ( )
Pt 1
4π
1 (TX)
Ae 2 Ae1
PRX = 2 2 Pt1 (10.1) Radiation intensity
from antenna 1 (TX) to
Directivity of Antenna 1
Rλ antenna 2 (RX).
Effective Area of
Antenna 1
4πAe1
D1 = λ2
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 118
Friis Transmission Formula
• Another version of equation (10.1) in the form of Directivity is:
D2 D1λ2 (10.2)
PRX = Pt1
(4πR )2
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 119
Example 10.1
• 100W is fed into a TX antenna, with the RX antenna at a distance of
10km away. Assume both TX and RX antenna as half-wavelength
dipole, operating at a frequency of 879 MHz.
– (a) Determine the received power at the RX antenna output.
Assume both antenna to be impedance matched, pointed to each
other at their maximum radiated intensity direction.
– (b) Repeat part (a) if both antenna has a radiation efficiency of 90%.
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 120
RADAR
• A RADAR (Radio Detection and Ranging) is a TX/RX system in which
the TX and RX antenna are at the same location and pointing towards
the same direction. Sometimes the TX and RX antenna consist of just
one antenna.
Pt
Si = 2
DTX
4πR
Pt TX
R
RX 1
Sr = 2
(Siσ s ) Object
4πR
Object ASSUMED to
scatter the incident EM wave
Plane wave isotropically (D=1)
from TX antenna
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 121
RADAR Equation and Cross Section
• Assume both TX and RX are same type of antenna, or same antenna,
thus DTX = DRX = D.
• From (10.2) with D1 = 1 (for the object) and D2 = D, the receive power
Pr at the RADAR is then:
Dλ2 Dλ2 Pt D
Pr = ( S σ ) = ⋅ σ ⋅
(4πR )2 i s (4πR )2 s 4πR 2
D 2 λ2σ s
⇒ Pr = P (10.3)
(4π ) R
3 4 t
Oct 2009 © Fabian Kung Wai Lee & Gobi Vetharatnam 2009 122