Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
,
.
,
'
C
'
.
s
1
.
)
:
:
l
"
C
c
0
1
.
)
Q
)
.
r
;
-
=
-
c
\
'
'
'
0
.
2
\
.
.
"
'
\
I
0
.
1
5
'
I
.
H
Q
)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
:
l
1
.
)
c
:
:
l
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
E
-
.
.
.
.
:
J
0
:
J
>
<
>
<
:
:
l
0
.
1
-
;
r
-
-
-
-
_
_
"
u
.
:
:
0
.
0
5
-
I
-
-
-
I
-
r
f
=
"
"
'
.
.
I
r
.
,
c
-
;
.
I
4
,
-
-
,
0
;
_
_
,
,
,
.
0
.
0
9
0
0
0
.
1
3
5
0
0
.
1
8
0
0
0
.
2
2
5
0
0
.
2
7
0
0
0
.
3
1
5
0
l
s
e
r
i
e
s
1
0
.
2
2
4
0
.
1
3
1
0
.
0
8
0
.
0
5
9
0
.
0
5
0
.
0
4
r
(
m
)
A
1
knowing the specification. The determining of the insulation layer thickness is also
done by trial and error. Based on these matters, the impedance of the prototype
transformer could not achieve as desired.
There are many ways to arrange the windings around the core. Arrangement of
windings in grounding transformers used in GSSs is indicated in fig 3.6. The two
sections of zigzag windings are arrange in one over other concentrically. Both
winding have same number of turns and wound using coil having same material and
same size. The inner most winding is the auxiliary winding. The two sections of
zigzag is arranged on the top of the auxiliary winding. Each winding is separated by
I
an insulating barrier to limit the impedance of the transformer.
Similar type of arrangement of windings was used in the prototype transformer. All
three windings were arranged in similar way. In addition to these three windings an
additional winding which is equal to the auxiliary winding in no. of turns, was added
be side the other windings in the core.
3.3.1 Simulation using prototype transformt!r
The prototype transformer was uged to analyze the induced voltages on the auxiliary
windings,
1. When the nominal voltages are applied to the primary zigzag winding and
2. When the fault currents are injected to the zigzag winding through the
neutral point.
In the second stage, to control the fault current flow through the windings, low
voltages were applied across the windings. Since the impedance of the prototype
._
transformer was considerably low (approx. 18 ohms), it was difficult to increase the
supply voltage beyond 30V. Therefore the maximum supply voltage that could apply
to the prototype transformer was 30V. For the comparison of results it is used the
same voltage range for the both stage one and stage two.
For the above two tests, three experiment setups were used.
35
a.) Experiment setup 1 - fig 3.7
All three phases were subjected to equal inphase currents, by short circuiting the
ends of primary windings (zigzag winding). The current of the loop was limited
by a rheostat. The induced voltages were measured for various current through the
short circuited zigzag winding.
b.) Experiment setup 2- fig. 3.8
The primary winding (zigzag winding) was supplied by controlled three phase
balanced supply and the transformer was loaded with a variable load to get the
primary currents equal to the current that observed in experiment setup 1. The
voltages induced at the auxiliary windings were measured at vacious load currents
by varying the supply voltage to the zigzag winding
c.) Experiment setup 3 - fig. 3.9
This setup combined the above two experiments. This measured the voltage
induced at the auxiliary winding when a inphase and equal currents are injected to
the three phases of the transformer zigzag winding while transformer is fed by the
nominal three phase voltage. The output voltage profile was inspected at the
auxiliary winding as observations.
...
...
....
37
Variac
Vnble
Resistor
'1'
....
Prototype Tl'80$fotmer
r .. . . . '
!
...
Fig 3. 7 Experiment Setup 1
38
i g z a g ~
7
lw:!Jiaty wdg 1
7
Auxilary wdg. 2
7
....
i
I
4
1 8
6
! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . . . . . . . . . _ _ _ ;
<
! :
I
o v
_ . . _
J
1
' l
l
I
I
I
. ;
J . . . _ _ . . _ - - - - - . . . - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - . . . . 1 .
l : , > e
3.4 Experiment results
3.4.1 Experiment setup 1 results
Normal3 phase test short circuited
Induced Voltages (V)
Auxiliary Winding - 1 Auxiliary Winding - 2
Supply V Current (A) R3 Y3 83 R4 Y4 B4
6.2V 1A 0.007 0.006 0.003 0.026 0.022 0.026
9V 1.SA 0.011 0.008 0.004 0.04 0.032 0.039
12.4V 2A 0.013 0.01 0.004 O.OS6 0.046 O.OSS
1SV 2.SA 0.018 0.014 0.006
O.<f1
O.OS6 0.068
19V 3A 0.021 0.01S 0.007 0.08S 0.066 0.08
22V 3.SA 0.025 0.017 0.009 0.101 0.076 0.092
2SV 4A 0.029 0.019 0.011 0.119 0.08 0.107
29.SV 4.SA 0.033 0.022 0.012 0.138 0.1 0.122
32V SA 0.038 0.023 0.01S 0.1SS 0.11S 0.133
Table3.1: Observations in the Experiment Results I
..
3.4.2 Experiment setup 2 results
Normal 3 phase test
Induced Voltages (V)
Auxiliary Winding - 1 Auxiliary Winding - 2
SupplyV Current (A) R3 Y3 83 R4 Y4 B4
6.2V 1A 0.12S 0.166 0.182 0.191 0.165 0.182
9V 1.SA 0.144 0.198 0.202 0.210 0.199 0.201
12.4V 2A 0.203 0.2S6 0.2S8 0.270 0.2S9 0.261
1SV 2.SA 0.294 0.299 0.296 0.319 0.319 0.311
19V 3A 0.354 0.3S9 0.355 0.378 0.378 0.371
22V 3.SA 0.420 0.414 0.409 0.440 0.432 0.423
2SV 4A 0.477 0.469 0.469 O.SOS 0.493 0.493
29.SV 4.5A 0.540 O.S1S O.S06 0.546 0.54S O.S33
32V SA 0.603 O.S67 O.S55 0.600 0.601 0.586
Table3.2: Observations in the Experiment Results 2
41
15
10
5
>
0
-5
-10
-15
15
10
5
>
0
-5
-1o I
-15
15
10
5
> 0
-5
-10
-15
R Phase
Time
.I
y phase
..
...
Time
B Phase
Time
Fig:3.1 0 Observations of Experiment 03
42
3.4.3 Experiment setup 3 results
The observed waveforms are indicated in fi g 3. 10
3.5 Analysis of Experiment Results
To observe the effect of fault current on the auxiliary winding at an earth fault, a
prototype of a grounding transformer with two auxiliary windings (with same number
of turns) was used.
The induced voltages in the auxiliary winding 1 and 2 were measured in experimental
setup 1 and experimental setup 2. The results are tabulated in table 3. 1. The
I
superimposed results are tabulated in table 3.2.
Fig. 3.11 shows the variation of induced voltages in two auxiliary windings, when
different voltages are applied to the primary (zigzag) winding. Curves 1 and 2 in Fig.
3.1 1 are almost identical. This implies that the voltage induced in the two auxiliary
windings in experimental setup-1 are equal. Curves 3 and 4 show some deviation
between them with the increase of supply voltage. This implies that some additional
voltage is induced in auxiliary windings in experimental setup 2 .
..
(Fig 3. 12 shows the induced voltage revel in two auxiliary windings as a percentage
of induced voltages at the respective auxiliary windings in experiment setup 1 ).
-.
43
0.700
0.600
0.500
do
! -' 0.400 +-
s
"1:
i
Q
i
> 0200
,00 I . . . ::
... .
0000 1 1 I I I I I I I
I- RYB1 - RYB2 - RYB3
Fig 3.11 Graph: Voltage induced in Aux. Winding against the injected current to
the neutral
Q
25.00
2000
.! 15 00
s
!
.s 10 00
.,_
5.00
. . . . . . .
1A
6.2V
Curr...t iVoltall"
--4---RYB2JRYB4 a-.g1 ayg2 J
Fig 3.12 Graph:% Voltage increased in Aux. Winding due to the injected
current to the neutral
44
Theoretically two conditions need to be satisfied to operate the grounding transformer
at an earth fault.
1. The zero sequence current flow through each winding ~ ) should be equal in
each phase.
2. The net flux induced in the limb by the zero sequence component of the current
flown through the windings should be zero.
Base on the experiment results on the prototype transformer there are two
conclusions.
. ~
~
1. There is a resultant voltage induced in auxiliary windings wound on each limb.
To induce a voltage there should be a net flux in the limb. Therefore the flow of
current through the primary windings in opposite direction is still creating a flux
in the limb.
2. The induced voltage in the auxiliary winding is different for two locations. i.e .
...
for location of auxiliary winding 1 and location of auxiliary winding 2 .
~
45