Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STRESS
RELV'D
Fig. 3 Fatigue-crack initiation data
AK(MPo m"
2
)
20 50 100
A 3 6 LASER WELDS
SASE
WELD
HAZ
"AS
REC'D.
X
AS
WELDED
a
0
STRESS
RELV'D.
5 /
- /
X
4
BASE METAL
TREND LINE
J I l l l l l
I O"
4
10 2 0 50 IOO
STRESS-INTENSITY RANGE, AKl KSI a/Hi)
Fig. 4 Fatigue-crack propagation data
speci men thi ckness, W is t he speci men
wi dt h measur ed f r om t he l oad line, and a
is t he crack dept h measur ed f r om t he
l oad line.
The t heor et i cal elastic stress concen-
t r at i on f act or (K
t
) can be cal cul at ed by
t aki ng t he rat i o of <r
max
/o-
n
f or a gi ven
speci men geomet r y and l oad range. For
t he speci men used in this i nvest i gat i on, as
shown in Fig. 1, using p = 0. 094 i n. (2.4
mm) , t he f act or was K
t
= 3.75.
The f at i gue-crack i ni ti ati on dat a gener-
at ed in this st udy are pl ot t ed in Fig. 3,
whi ch is a semi l ogari t hmi c pl ot of AK/ -v/p*
versus cycl es-t o-i ni t i at i on (IM). The cur ve
of t he base met al t r end line is shown f or
r ef er ence purposes. Run-out poi nt s are
shown at 3 X 10
6
cycl es. Despi t e some
degr ee of scatter in t he dat a, whi c h s not
unusual in wel dment s, t he base met al and
t he post wel d heat t r eat ed wel d met al
and heat af f ect ed zone materi al s exhi bi t
similar f at i gue-crack i ni ti ati on behavi or . In
most i nstances, t he as- wel ded wel d met al
and HAZ materi al s exhi bi t somewhat
superi or f at i gue-crack i ni ti ati on per f or -
mance (l onger life). This di f f er ence
bet ween as- wel ded and post wel d heat
t r eat ed materi al s may be due t o benef i -
cial compr essi ve resi dual stresses f r om
t he wel di ng process.
Fatigue-Crack Propagation
Fati gue-crack pr opagat i on dat a are
shown in Fig. 4, whi ch is a l ogari t hmi c pl ot
of crack g r o wt h rat e ( da/ dN) versus
stress i ntensi ty range (AK). Agai n, as in t he
pr evi ous dat a pl ot , t he base met al t r end
line is shown f or r ef er ence pur poses. As
discussed earl i er, bot h speci men t ypes
wer e used. The bl unt - not ch speci men
was used f or all t he dat a in t he as- wel ded
condi t i on and f or some of t he ot her dat a.
The base met al dat a bet ween 23. 89 and
27.09 ksi x/in". (26.25 and 29. 77 MPa/ v/ m)
wer e gener at ed wi t h this speci men, whi l e
t he r emai nder of t he base met al dat a was
gener at ed wi t h t he shar p- not ch speci -
mens. The dat a f or HAZ not ched speci -
mens in t he PWHT condi t i on bet ween
32.97 and 42. 88 ksi \ / i n . (36.23 and 47. 12
MPa \ / m) and t he dat a f or wel d not ched
speci mens in t he PWHT condi t i on
bet ween 24. 12 and 34. 94 k s i \ / F- (26. 50
and 38. 39 MPav' r n) wer e also gener at ed
wi t h t he bl unt - not ch speci men.
The crack pr opagat i on dat a show t he
same or der i ng of f at i gue behavi or as was
seen in t he crack i ni ti ati on dat a, i.e.,
similar results f or t he base met al and
post wel d heat t r eat ed wel d met al and
HAZ materi al s, and superi or per f or mance
( l ower crack gr owt h rates) in t he as-
wel ded wel d met al and HAZ materi al s.
Such crack gr owt h r et ar dat i on in wel ds
has been obser ved el sewher e and is
at t r i but ed t o compr essi ve resi dual
stresses i nt r oduced by wei di ng (Ref.
12).
Conclusions
Based upon t he results of this st udy, it
appears t hat t he f at i gue pr oper t i es of
wel d met al and heat af f ect ed zones in
ASTM A36 steel wel dment s are equal or
superi or t o t hose of t he base met al .
However , a wo r d of caut i on is in or der
here. The f at i gue behavi or of st ruct ural
wel dment s is pri mari l y cont r ol l ed by f ac-
t ors whi ch lie beyond t he scope of this
i nvest i gat i on, namel y, not ches, di scont i -
nuities and resi dual stresses, whi ch can be
dependent on wel dment geomet r y and
wel di ng pr ocedur es (Ref. 13). However ,
t he results of this st udy pr ovi de assurance
that laser beam wel di ng pr oduces A36
steel wel dment s wi t h basic f at i gue pr op-
erties t hat are as sound as t hose of t he
base mat eri al .
References
1. Metzbower, E. A. 1981. Laser welding.
Naval Engineer /ournal 93(8):49-58.
2. Met zbower, E. A., and Moon, D. W.
1982. Laser beam welding of ASTM A36 steel.
Lasers in Metallurgy, pp. 255-262. Warren-
dale, Pa.: American Institute of Mining, Metal-
lurgical and Petroleum Engineers.
3. Met zbower, E. A., Moon, D. W. , and
Fraser, F. W. 1982. Mechanical behavior of
laser beam weldments. Trends in Welding
Research in the United States, pp. 563-577.
Metals Park, Ohi o: American Society for Met-
als.
4. ASTM A36-81a. 1982. Standard specifi-
cation for structural steel. 1982 Annual Book of
ASTM Standards, Part 4:1-4. Philadelphia, Pa.:
American Society for Testing and Materials. .
5. Saxena, A., and Hudak, S. J., Jr. 1978.
Review of extension of compliance informa-
tion for common crack growt h specimens.
International journal of Fracture 14(5):453-
468.
6. ASTM E 647-83. 1984. Standard test
method for constant-load-amplitude fatigue
crack growt h rates above 10
- 8
m/cycle. 1984
Annual Book of ASTM Standards 03.01:711-
731. Philadelphia, Pa.: American Society for
Testing and Materials.
7. Yoder, C. R., Cooley, L. A., and Crooker,
T. W. 1981. Procedures for precision measure-
ment of fatigue crack growt h rate using crack-
opening displacement techniques. Fatigue
Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analy-
sis, ASTM STP 738, eds. S. ). Hudak, Jr., and
R. |. Bucci, pp. 85-102. Philadelphia, Pa.: Amer-
ican Society for Testing and Materials.
8. Novak, S. R. 1983. Corrosion-fatigue
crack initiation behavior of four structural
steels. Corrosion Fatigue: Mechanics, Metallur-
gy, Electrochemistry and Engineering, ASTM
STP 801, eds. T. W. Crooker and B. N. Leis, pp.
26-63. Philadelphia, Pa.: American Society for
Testing and Materials.
9. Yoder, G. R., Cooley, L. A., and Crooker,
T. W. 1985. Observations on a fracture
mechanics approach to fatigue crack initiation
in Ti-6AI-4V. Fracture Mechanics: Sixteenth
Symposium, ASTM STP 868, eds. M. F. Kannin-
en and A. T. Hopper, pp. 392-405. Philadel-
phia, Pav American Society for Testing and
Materials.
10. Rolfe, S. T., and Barsom, J. M. 1977.
Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures., p.
212. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
11. Wessel, E. T Clark, W. C, ]r and
Wilson, W. K. 1966. Engineering methods for
the design and selection of materials against
fracture. DDC Report AD 801001, Defense
Documentation Center.
12. Kapadia, B. M. 1978. Influence of resid-
ual stresses on fatigue crack propagation in
electroslag welds. Fatigue Testing of Weld-
ment, ASTM STP 648, ed. D. W. Hoeppner,
pp. 244-260. Philadelphia, Pa.: American Soci-
ety for Testing and Materials.
13. Reemsnyder, H. S. 1978. Development
and application of data for structural steel
weldments. Ibid. 3- 21.
50-s | FEBRUARY 1986