PARAMETRIC CYCLE ANALYSIS OF TURBOFAN ENGINES

PROPULSI PESAWAT TERBANG

AE 3212













AGUSTINUS DIMAS 13608039



FAKULTAS TEKNIK MESIN DAN DIRGANTARA
JURUSAN AERONOTIKA & ASTRONOTIKA
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2011

INPUTS : M
0
, T
0
, , C
P,
h
PR
, T
t4
,
c
,
f
,
OUTPUTS : F/
0
, f, S,
T
,
P
,
O
, FR
EQUATIONS :

)
()

)
()

)]

)
Specific Thrust

)]
Fuel/air Ratio

)

Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption

( ) (

)

Thermal Efficiency

Propulsive Efficiency

)

Overall Efficiency

Thrust Ratio

Gambar 1 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: specific thrust


Gambar 2 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

c
specific thrust
0.5
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
8
12
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

c
thrust specific fuel consumption
0.5
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
8
12

Gambar 3 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: fuel/air ratio


Gambar 4 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: thermal efficiency

0.022
0.024
0.026
0.028
0.030
0.032
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
f

c
fuel/air ratio
f
20
30
40
50
60
70
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

c
thermal efficiency
T

Gambar 5 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: propulsive and overall efficiencies


Gambar 6 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for
f
=2 and M
0
=0.9: thrust ratio

20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

P




(%)

c
propulsive and overall efficiencies
0.5
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
8
12
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
FR

c
specific thrust
0.5
1
1.5
2
3
4
5
8
12

Gambar 7 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for =5 and M
0
=0.9: specific thrust


Gambar 8 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for =5 and M
0
=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

160.00
180.00
200.00
220.00
240.00
260.00
280.00
300.00
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

c
specific thrust
1.2
1.5
2
3
3.5
4
4.5
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

c
thrust specific fuel consumption
1.2
1.5
2
3
3.5
4
4.5

Gambar 9 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for =5 and M
0
=0.9: propulsive efficiency


Gambar 10 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for =5 and M
0
=0.9: overall efficiency

45
50
55
60
65
70
75
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

P
(%)

c
propulsive efficiency
1.5
2
3
3.5
4
4.5
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0
(%)

c
overall efficiency
1.2
1.5
2
3
3.5
4
4.5

Gambar 11 Ideal turbofan performance versus
c
, for =5 and M
0
=0.9: thrust ratio

0
2
4
6
8
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
FR

c
thrust ratio
1.2
1.5
2
3
3.5
4
4.5

Gambar 12 Ideal turbofan performance versus
f
, for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: specific thrust


Gambar 13 Ideal turbofan performance versus
f
, for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1 2 3 4 5 6
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

c
specific thrust
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
12
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
1 2 3 4 5 6
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

c
thrust specific fuel consumption
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
12

Gambar 14 Ideal turbofan performance versus
f
, for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: propulsive efficiency


Gambar 15 Ideal turbofan performance versus
f
, for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: thrust ratio

40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
1 2 3 4 5 6

P
(%)

c
propulsive efficiency
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
12
0
1
2
3
4
5
1 2 3 4 5 6
FR

c
thrust ratio
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
12

Gambar 16 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: specific thrust


Gambar 17 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: thrust specific fuel consumption

100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

c
specific thrust
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
12.00
14.00
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

c
thrust specific fuel consumption
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5

Gambar 18 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: propulsive efficiency


Gambar 19 Ideal turbofan performance versus , for
c
=24 and M
0
=0.9: thrust ratio

30
40
50
60
70
80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12

P
(%)

c
propulsive efficiency
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
0
1
2
3
4
5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
FR

c
thrust ratio
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5

Gambar 20 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=2: specific thrust


Gambar 21 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=2: thrust specific fuel consumption

0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

M
0

specific thrust
0.5
1
2
5
8
10
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

M
0

thrust specific fuel consumption
0.5
1
2
5
8
10

Gambar 22 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=2: propulsive efficiency


Gambar 23 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=2: overall efficiency

0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

P
(%)

M
0

propulsive efficiencies
0.5
1
2
5
8
10
T
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0
(%)
M
0

overall efficiency
0.5
1
2
5
8
10

Gambar 24 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=2: thrust ratio

0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
FR
M
0

thrust ratio
0.5
1
2
5
8
10

Gambar 25 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=3: specific thrust


Gambar 26 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=3: thrust specific fuel consumption

0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
F
/

0

[
N
/
(
k
g
/
s
e
c
)
]

M
0

specific thrust
0
0.2
0.5
1
2
5
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
S
[
m
g
/
(
N
.
s
e
c
)
]

M
0

thrust specific fuel consumption
0
0.2
0.5
1
2
5

Gambar 27 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=3: propulsive efficiency

Gambar 28 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=3: overall efficiency

0
20
40
60
80
100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

P
(%)
M
0

propulsive efficiencies
0
0.2
0.5
1
2
5
T
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

0

(%)
M
0
overall efficiency
0
0.2
0.5
1
2
5

Gambar 29 Ideal turbofan performance versus M
0
, for
c
=24 and
f
=3: thrust ratio
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
FR
M
0

thrust ratio
0
0.2
0.5
1
2
5