Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
t
Time, t
S
t
r
a
i
n
,
Experimental data
Best fit
Fig. 3. Typical creep curve
for a given value of stress .
TAM 224/CEE 210 Creep of Metals and Polymers 103
10.4. Analysis of Results
1. Prepare plots of strain as functions of time t for
each of the two materials tested by your group.
Note that the strain is given by
( ) , t
l
l
=
0
where l is the recorded change in length of the
specimen and l
0
is the measured gage length.
Label each curve with the appropriate value of
stress . The stress is given by
= =
P
A
W
A
10 0 .
,
where W = Mg. See Fig. 4.
2. Determine for each stress level the steady-state
creep rate
&
ss
(in sec
1
), by calculating the slope of
the best-fit line for each specimen:
&
ss
=
t
.
For best results, use a common time interval t
for all four stress levels, and let this time interval
begin at the same time relative to the time at
which the load was increased.
3. Then, collecting the experimental data for
&
ss
and
corresponding values of (in MPa) for a given
material in Table 2, plot log
&
10
ss
vs. log
10
. The
plot will have the general appearance of Fig. 5.
There will be two such plots, one for each
material. An expanded scale may be necessary for
the log
10
axis.
1
4. For each material, examine the apparent depend-
ence of log
&
10
ss
on log
10
. If the relation
appears to be a linear one (as suggested in Fig. 5),
then determine the constants B and m in the Dorn
(1954) creep relation
2
&
ss
= B
m
(1)
by noting that, if Eqn. (1) holds, then
log
&
log log
10 10 10
ss
= + B m . (2)
Show your calculations for B and m. If the relation
appears to be a nonlinear one, then determine the
apparent variation in m (that is, the range of
values of slope of the log
&
10
ss
vs. log
10
curve)
from low stress levels to high stress levels.
1
See also How to Prepare and Interpret Graphs at the beginning
of the lab manual. The use of regular log-log paper is not
recommended in this lab because there may be a much
larger variation in log (
&
)
10
ss
than in log ( )
10
.
2
The Dorn creep relation is actually of the form
&
/
ss
=
A e
m H RT
,
where H denotes an activation energy, R is the universal
gas constant, and T is the absolute temperature. If T =
constant, then one may set B A H RT = exp( ) .
Time, t
S
t
r
e
s
s
a
n
d
s
t
r
a
i
n
=
1
=
2
=
3
=
4
1
.
2
.
3
.
4
.
Strain response
Fig. 4. Straintime curves
for an incremental-stress creep test.
1
log ()
Experimental data
Best fit
m
10
l
o
g
(
)
1
0
s
s
.
Fig. 5. Experimental determination of power-law
exponent m for creep.
104 Behavior of Engineering Materials TAM 224/CEE 210
10.5. Points for Discussion
Note.Your lab instructor will indicate which of the
following questions are to be addressed in your report.
1. Discuss the consequences of a large m value.
2. Comment on the similarities and differences
between the creep behavior of lead and that of the
polymer you worked with.
3. Discuss any differences in the mechanisms of
creep between the two materials.
4. Determine if your results are consistent with
published data for these and other materials. (See
Marks Handbook (1987), for example.)
5. State whether the measured creep rates appear to
be in the steady-state creep region. If not, discuss
possible causes and indicate potential limitations
of the experiment.
6. Discuss the observed dependence of the creep rate
on temperature. Is this observation consistent
with the Dorn relation for creep? (See footnote on
previous page.)
7. For the lead specimen, determine the probable
dominant creep mechanism, based on the infor-
mation provided in Fig. 6. With what certainty
can you predict the steady-state creep rate for lead
at a stress level of, say, one-tenth the smallest
value considered in your experiment?
8. Look up the melting point T
m
and shear modulus
G for lead in suitable references, and determine
whether your experimental creep data for lead are
consistent with Ashby and Joness deformation-
mechanism diagram for metals (1981). (See
Fig. 7.) Note that all temperatures must be
absolute (degrees Kelvin).
9. Determine if your polymer behaves in a linear
viscoelastic manner. A linear viscoelastic material
has the property that, under the application of a
log[Stress, ]
l
o
g
[
C
r
e
e
p
r
a
t
e
,
]
s
s
Grain-boundary
diffusion
Power-law creep
(dislocation climb)
Yielding
Yield
stress
m = 1
3 < m < 8
m > 8
.
Fig. 6. Relation between creep exponent m and
possible deformation mechanisms in metals.
(After Ashby and Jones, 1981.)
Temperature, T/T
S
t
r
e
s
s
,
/
G
0 0.3 0.5 1
10
10
10
10
Yielding
Melting
Elastic
deformation
only
Diffusional flow
Dislocation
creep
Grain
boundary
Bulk
Bulk
5
4
3
2
m
Fig. 7. Deformation-mechanism diagram for metals.
(After Ashby and Jones, 1981.)
Stress,
Strain,
Instanta-
neous
elasticity
Time, t
(t)
Delayed
elasticity
Strain
recovery
Fig. 8. Creep compliance curve for a standard linear
viscoelastic solid.
TAM 224/CEE 210 Creep of Metals and Polymers 105
step increase in stress , the material will exhibit
a time-dependent incremental strain response
( ) t that is proportional to . This linearity
implies also that the incremental creep rate
&
( ) t
will be proportional to , and therefore that the
creep exponent m as determined in this lab should
have the value unity. It is particularly important,
in making this determination from your data, that
the time interval over which the creep rate is
determined occur at a consistent time after the
application of each incremental stress.
10. Determine, if possible, whether your polymer
exhibited any of the following characteristics:
instantaneous elasticity, delayed elasticity, and
strain recovery. Refer to Fig. 8, where these effects
are illustrated for the so-called standard linear
solid. A standard linear solid is a model
consisting of two springs in series, with a dashpot
across one of the springs, as shown in the figure.
Note that real viscoelastic behavior, even if it is
observed to be linear, is rarely explained in terms
of such a simple model. However, this is the
simplest model that exhibits all three of these
characteristics.
10.6. References
Ashby, M. F., and D. R. H. Jones. 1981. Engineering
MaterialsAn Introduction to Their Properties and
Applications. Oxford: Pergamon, Chapters 17-20.
Avallone, E. A., and T. Baumeister III, eds. 1987.
Marks Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers,
9th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Section 5.1. See
discussion of creep.
Callister Jr., W. D. 2003. Materials Science and Engi-
neeringAn Introduction, 6th ed. New York: Wiley,
Sections 8.148.17.
Dorn, J. E. 1954. Some fundamental experiments on
high temperature creep. Journal of the Mechanics
and Physics of Solids 3: 85-116.
Flinn, R. A., and P. K. Trojan. 1990. Engineering Mate-
rials and Their Applications, 4th ed. Boston:
Houghton Mifflin, 176-183, 430-431, 513, 690-691.
Notes
106 Behavior of Engineering Materials TAM 224/CEE 210
Table 1Creep data
Measurement or property Material
Quantity Symbol Units Lead
Specimen dimensions
Gage length l
0
mm
Width w mm
Thickness t mm
Cross-sectional area A mm
2
Applied loads
1 Initial mass M
1
g
2 Incremtl mass g
3 Incremtl mass g
4 Incremtl mass g
5 Incremtl mass g
Test date: Team(s): Students name:
Table 2Summary of creep results
Material
Stress,
(MPa)
Creep rate,
&
ss
(sec
1
)
log ( )
10
(MPa)
log (
&
)
10
ss
(sec
1
)
m B
Lead*
*Note: for lead, the values of m and B may or may not be constant over the whole range of strain rates considered.
Date: Team(s): Students name:
Printed 7/9/03