Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

ESL Writing Profile: INGL 3103 (087) Fall 2014

Date: / Topic:

SCORE RANGE CRITERIA COMMENTS

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Knowledgeable* clear formulation of thesis and conceptual
framework* moves clearly from theory to application*
17-15 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Can move from theory to application* material relevant to assigned topic* thesis
should be more clearly developed
14-10 FAIR TO POOR: Limited development of thesis* limited knowledge of subject* inadequate knowledge
of topic* several ideas unacknowledged or plagiarized
9-0 VERY POOR: Unacceptable development of topic* non-substantive* Ideas unacknowledged or plagiarized

INDEPENDENT/CRITICAL THINKING
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Critical and independent thought demonstrated
17-15 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Ability to provide independent commentary* Adequate independent
commentary
14-10 FAIR TO POOR: Needs to develop more independence of thought* Little independent thought* Frequent
dependence on plot summary and/or borrowings.
9-0 VERY POOR: No independent thought* Excessive use of plot summary* Plagiarized*

ORGANIZATION AND FORMAT
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Cohesive* Logical Sequencing
17-15 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Somewhat uneven* Loosely organized but main ideas stand out* Occasional
errors in format and/or documentation*
14-10 FAIR TO POOR: Ideas disconnected or confused* Lacks logical sequencing* Excessive borrowings,
little synthesis* Frequent errors in format/documentation
9-0 VERY POOR: No organization* No format/ documentation

DETAILS-SUPPORT
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Thorough explanation or analysis of supporting details* Secondary
criticism integrated with own thesis* specific
17-15 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Well supported* adequate support from primary and secondary sources but more
analysis needed* tendency to be too general
14-10 FAIR TO POOR: Inadequate use of supporting details* Secondary criticism not integrated with own
material* Secondary criticism taken from unreliable online sources* Secondary criticism
unacknowledged/plagiarized* too general
9-0 VERY POOR: Not substantive* plagiarized.

VOCABULARY AND LANGUAGE USE
20-18 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: Sophisticated range* Effective sentences* Occasional errors
17-15 GOOD TO AVERAGE: Adequate range* Some errors of vocabulary/grammar/ spelling/ punctuation
14-10 FAIR TO POOR: Limited range* frequent errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/function,
articles, pronouns, prepositions, fragments, run-ons, punctuation, paragraphing, spelling* Unacknowledged or
plagiarized phrases often used
9-0 VERY POOR: Frequent errors of word/idiom form* No mastery of sentence construction* Little knowledge
of English Vocabulary* Dominated by errors* Dominated by unacknowledged or plagiarized phrases

TOTAL GENERAL COMMENTS