Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
In Abhidhamma, there are twele dierent types o immoral
consciousness. O them, the irst eight are based on attachment
or lobha.
1
1he three charactestics o demerit, namely lobha
,attachment or greed,, dosa ,anger,, and moha ,bewilderment,,
are similar as obstacles to Nibb"na. So only the wise understands
them as hindrances and stries to detach themseles rom them.
Greed prevents people from performing meritorious
deeds, such as giving, because the main characteristic of
greed is attachment (up!d!na). It compels us to grasp more
Ajahn Sumedho, Now is the Knowing,P.31, Amar"ati Publications 1989
1 Ven. N"rada Mah" 1hera, A Manual o Abhidhamma p.22.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 15
and more. \hen we grasp more and more, unaware o it
ourseles, we are attached to the world. It is because o
ignorance o the act o impermanence that we go ater mirages
and deceptions, and are caught up in illusions o attachment with
pererted iews ,ipall"sa,.
In this modern society, people are awully attached to worldly
things such as electrical items and shiny ornaments. 1heir
indiidualism leads them to acquisitieness.
loweer, in the midst o this senseless, materially inclined
world, things oer no consolation. 1hereore, it is eident that
man cannot be satisied through acquisitieness. Buddhism
teaches us to be simple with ew desires, by not being greedily
attached to things at all, animate or inanimate. Lradication o
greed and attachment is the only way to be contented or
satisied.
b). Difference between 1anh! and Up!d!na
1anh" ,craing, is the eighth link in the ormulation o the
Dependent Origination ,Paticca samupp"da,, which is the
doctrine o the conditionality o all physical and psychical
phenomena. Dependant on eeling, craing arises ,edan"
paccay" tanh",. According to early Buddhism, tanh" is craing. It
is the chie root cause o suering and o the eer-continuing
cycle o rebirths. 1his certainly is a multiaceted term.
Up"d"na is, as mentioned here, a three-dimensional term
which represent attachment, clinging, and grasping. 1hese three
terms denote three phases o up"d"na. Dependant on tanh",
up"d"na arises ,tanh" paccay" up"d"nam,. Reerring to the two
terms, tanh" means craing, or haing strong desire or a certain
thing, which proides pleasant eeling ,Piyarupe s"rajjati,. \hen
one is touched by a pleasant eeling, i one delights in it,
16 At t achment and Det achment
welcomes it, and remains holding on to it, then the underlying
tendency to lust lies within one ,abhinandati, abhiadati,
ajjhos"ya titthati tassa r"g"nusayo anuseti,
1
.
1ouched by a pleasant eeling, i one gets attached to it,
clings to it, then stries to grasp it with the arising o this is
mine` ,eso mama, this I am` ,esohamasmi, and this is mysel`
,eso me att",-ego concept-that is up"d"na. I one sees things as
they actually are with proper wisdom, one becomes disenchanted
with them, is able to be dispassionate towards them. 1hen, he
sees them in this light: this is not mine` ,netam mama,, this I
am not` ,ne so aham asmi,, this is not my sel` ,ne so me att",.
According to the Mab! attbiaaoava vtta o the Ma;;biva
^i/!,a,
2
this so-called man with the ie aggregates aected by
clinging, are dependently arising. 1he desire, indulgence,
inclination, and holding based on these ie aggregates aected
by clinging is the origin o suering ,chando "layo anunayo
ajjhos"nam, so dukkha samudayo,. 1he Buddha, in short, said
that the ie aggregates aected by clinging are suering
,sankhittena pancup"d"nakkhandh" dukkh",. I one does not
grasp things as one`s own and eradicates the I` concept
,up"d"na, completely one can achiee the Lnlightenment
,Anup"d"na,.
c). Conditaional Link of Attachment which Leads
to Being (Bhava)
Paticcasamupp"da is a basic teaching o Buddhism. 1he
doctrine itsel is deep and proound. Dependent origination`,
Dependent arising`, Casual conditioning`, Casual genesis`,
Conditioned co-production`, Casual dependencies`, are some
1 M.N. 148 Sutta
2 M.N.28 Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 1
Lnglish equialents. 1he Buddha expounded this teaching o
casual conditioning in the Mab! ^ia!va vtta o the Digba
^i/!,a. It is a deep and complex doctrine. By not understanding,
and not penetrating this doctrine, beings hae become entangled
as in a knotted ball o thread or hae become like munja grass
and rushes, unable to pass beyond the woeul states o existence,
or Sams"ra, the cycle o existence.
1
,Gambhiroc"yam Ananda
paticcasamupp"do gambhir"abh"so ca, etassa Ananda
dhammassa ananubodh" appattiedh" eamayam paj"
tant"kulakaj"t" gul"gundikaj"t" munjababbaja bhut" ap"yam
duggatim inip"tam sams"ram n"tiattati.,
2
!bev tbi. i., tbat cove. to be,
!itb tbe ari.ivg of tbi., tbat ari.e.,
!bev tbi. i. vot, tbat aoe. vot cove to be,
!itb tbe ce..atiov of tbi. tbat cea.e..
1hat is the principle o causal conditioning.
1his conditionality goes on oreer whether Buddhas are
born or not in the world. ,Upp"d"" 1ath"gat"nam anupp"d""
1ath"gat"nam thit"a s" dh"tu dhammatthitat" dhamma
niy"mat" idappaccayat",.
3
1he explanation o this unique
doctrine o dependent origination is ound in the Kivarea a,ivg
,S.N.,, where a clear illustration and eriication in multiarious
aspects too are oered.
According to the |avi.! vtta o the av,vtta ^i/!,a, all
actiities are in causal relation to the sixold sense spheres, and
to name and orm ,n"ma rupa paccay" sal"yatanam,. So, again to
1 Piyadassi 1hera. 1he Spectrum o Buddhism. P.13.
2 D.N. 15 Sutta P.55
3 S.N. II. Nid"na Samyutta
18 At t achment and Det achment
grasping with craing ,tanh" paccay" up"d"nam,. 1he two links
o dependent origination are o the utmost signiicance or being
,bhaa,. Being` or becoming`, means not only being a human
being but also any kind o being ,animate things,. But we should
understand that there is no being without consciousness
,inn"na,.
1hereore, in accordance with Buddhism, one's
consciousness plays the ital role in the process o sams"ra or
cycle o existence. 1hat is why the Buddha always taught
Dhamma with the centralization o consciousness. le taught
that mind is the orerunner o all mental states ,mano
pubbangam"dhamm",. Lerything is mind made, whether it is
good or eil. Beings are born to this world because o being
greedily attached ,up"d"na, a mental condition. Buddhism, in
many Discourses, teaches the adantages o being detached rom
animate or inanimate things. lor instance, the Metta vtta or
Karavi,a Metta vtta o Mivor .vtbotogie. clearly requires that we
not be attached to amilies ,Kulesu ananugiddho,.
\hen one is greedily attached to amilies, one is always
placed in an extreme position o diiculty and as a result, one
cannot maintain one's mental indierence, or equanimity.
Lquanimity ,upekkh", is a main teaching o Buddhism.
Attachment, either personal or impersonal, paes the way to
ignorance ,aijj",, which preents one rom understanding what
is good or eil, what is merit and what is demerit, what is right
and what is wrong. 1hereore, we should be wise enough to be
detached rom the world and equanimous as ar as possible.
Neertheless, here, I should emphatically say that reulsion is
the other extreme. So attachment as well as reulsion should be
understood ery clearly and categorically. Understanding
detachment paes the way to the realization o Nibb"na through
upekkha or equanimity.
Becoming` in the K"m" world ,sense sphere,, becoming`
in the Rupa world ,sphere o orm,, and becoming` in the
Arupa world ,sphere o the ormless,, are the three worlds o
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 19
becoming` ,1ayo me bhikkhae bha" k"mabhao, rupabhao,
arupabhao ayam uccati bhikkhae bhao,.
1
Again, it is stated
that birth is the birth o dierent kinds o beings into the arious
realms o sentient existence, their being born, their origination,
their being conceied, and their coming into existence, the
maniestation o their aggregates o being, the acquisition o the
sense bases. 1his is birth ,y" tesam tesam satt"nam tamhi tamhi
sattanik"ye j"ti sanj"ti okkanti abhinibbanti khandh"nam
p"tubh"o "yatan"nam patil"bho ayam uccati bhikkha j"ti,.
2
1hrough these lines, we can understand that birth means the
appearance o the skhandhas or the ieold aggregates o
existence.
d). Pa"cakkhandha and Pa"caup!d!nakkhandha
(1he Iive Groups and Iive Grasping Groups)
1he ie groups are not suering. 1he Buddha neer taught
that the ie groups are suering ,pancakkhandh"dukkh",.
Neertheless, ie grasping groups are suering
,pancup"d"nakkhandh" dukkh",. 1hose ie are namely:
Rupup"d"nakkhandho -Grasping group o corporeality
Vedanup"d"nakkhandho -Grasping group o eeling
Sannup"d"nakkhandho -Grasping group o perception
Sankh"rup"d"nakkhandho -Grasping group o mental ormation
Vinn"nup"d"nakkhando- Grasping group o consciousness
1 S.N.II.2.2
2 M.N.141 Sutta
20 At t achment and Det achment
1hese are the ie aspects through which the Buddha has
summed up all the physical and mental phenomena o existence,
and which appears to the ignorant man as his Lgo or personality.
\hen we philosophically and psychologically analyze these ie
aspects, we can understand that the eeling or edan"` is the
aectie dimension. Perception and consciousness or sann"`
and inn"na` are the cognitie dimension and mental
ormation is the conatie dimension, to wit:
Vedan" " Aectie dimension
Sann" -Vinn"na " Cognitie dimension
Sankh"ra " Conatie dimension
As stated earlier, haing ie khandhas or groups is neither
harmul nor the cause o suering. Suering arises because o
attachment ,up"d"na,. A being` means the one who is attached
to the ie aggregates o existence ,"satto, isatto, laggita
m"naso,. In the Abhidhamma, both the mind and matter that
constitute this complex machinery o man are microscopically
analyzed. As the inest lower o Buddhist thought, the Special
Dhamma, Abhidhamma aoids both pluralism and monism
through the teaching o analysis and synthesis. 1hese ie groups
o existence are analyzed into 81 actors. 1here are only these 81
irreducible actors o dhamma existing in the world. Apart rom
these 81 actors, there is no permanent entity. 1hese irreducible
actors are in the orm o soul` but they are interdependent.
1hereore, it is clearly understood that there is no soul ,atta,.
1he 1eaching o Abhidhamma is o utmost importance because
it helps us to understand the concept o soullessness in
Buddhism.
Ior the realization of Nibb!na one should intuitively
penetrate the five grasping groups and should realize the
three main characteristics of existence, namely
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 21
impermanence (anicca), unsatisfactoriness (dukkha), and
soullessness (anatta).
All beings are born and die. 1here is death because o birth.
Death is unaoidable to beings` born to this world. Ior the
cessation of death, birth should cease. 1he Buddha
comprehended the dhamma of the cessation of birth. He
realized that the way of cessation of birth is the only way to
detachment (anup!d!na). 1he Buddhas are born in society,
lie in society, but are detached rom worldly things. 1he simile
o the lotus is the best example gien to explain them in the
Canonical 1eaching. 1he adjectie used to show the main
characteristic o the Buddha is unattached`,anupalitta,. His
1eaching for the 4S years of his ministry is out and out not
to be attached to but be detached from the whole world,
which does not mean physically detached and isolated. One
should lie in society and moe in society but be mentally
detached, rom all sorts o deilement ,kilesa,.
e). 1he Iour Kinds of Clinging (Up!d!na)
1here are our kinds o clinging or attachment ,up"d"na, in
Buddhist Scriptures. 1hose our are classiied according to the
degree o craing. 1hey are:
Sensuous clinging ,k"mup"d"na,
Clinging to iews ,ditthup"d"na,
Clinging to mere rules and rituals ,silabbatup"d"na,
Clinging to the personality belie ,atta"dup"d"na,
1
\hen we consider the aboe our as described in the
canonical texts, it is clear that each one o these describes a type
o bondage o man. 1he 1eaching o the Buddha is not to be
1 Ny"natiloka 1hera, Buddhist Dictionary P 215, and see. S.N.II.2.2. and A.N. II.10.
22 At t achment and Det achment
bound to the sensuous orm or the ormless worlds, but to be
released rom all kinds o bondage o man. According to the
Covevaivv of Pbito.ob, by Shew Zan Aung, the term Up"d"na`
means irmly grasping`. In the same work, Zan Aung shows
the interpretation gien in the Commentary. It says that the term
is explained to mean that which is tenaciously or irmly grasped
as a snake does a rog ,bhusam "diyanti amuncit" ganhantiti
up"d"nam,
1
.
\e, human beings are born to this sensuous sphere and rom
birth to death we strie to acquire more and more things. It is
only a wise man who understands the danger o grasping or
attachment, stries to get rid o suering ,dukkha,. 1his is the
clear path or the cessation o suering.
O the our clingings, the irst is clinging to sensuous things.
1he world we lie in itsel, is called k"maloka`. \e all hae lust
or material and immaterial things, which is considered as sense-
desire by way o basic sense-desire or all the worldly
conditions.
2
1he indiidual or the personality perceies things
not as they really are, but through his persistent and unquenched
lust or sense-desire.
\hen one perceies something, one stries to irmly grasp it
because o one's desire is to possess it as one`s own. 1hat is the
starting point o the dierent orms o suering. 1he person,
who is attached to sense pleasures, is likened to a wet, sappy
stick`placed in water. It can no longer be used to light a ire, so
the one, who is addicted to sense pleasure, is unable to attain the
incomparable sel-awakening` ,anuttar"ya sambodh"ya,. In the
same manner, attachment to sense pleasures destroys the
mind's ability to think clearly and objectively. 1hereore,
1 Shew Zan Aung, Compendium o Philosophy -199
2 1he Path o Purity ,P1S, P.683
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 23
one should gie up one's boundless desire or the sake o the
realization o Nibb"na.
In this context, we must ery clearly understand that the
existence o Sense-bases and Sense data are not up"d"na
,attachment,. It is only when one grasps something through
one's consciousness by responding to sense bases and sense
data, that eeling, craing, and attachment arises respectiely.
Buddhism teaches us the way to puriy our consciousness. I
one's consciousness is pure, as pure as a lotus, such
consciousness is no doubt detached rom all types o sensuous
pleasure in the world ,K"mesu anupalitto,. So haing merely six
internal sense-bases and six-external sense bases does not push
one into the cycle o rebecoming ,rebirth,, and the mundane
world.
J. K!ma Up!d!na (sensuous clinging)
K"ma up"d"na or sensuous clinging is explained together
with ditthup"d"na, silabbatup"d"na and atta"dup"d"na in, 1he
Path o Puriication` ,1i.vaabivagga,, written by Ven.
Buddhaghosha and also, in the .bbiabavva Cbavari/a, it is
explained iidly and categorically in detail.
1
Grasping o sensuous things is k"mup"d"na. \hile we are
liing in this world, we are compelled to grasp things as i they
are permanent. But, Buddhism teaches us that eery thing is
impermanent ,anicca,.
Attachment to sense pleasure ,k"mup"d"na,, means the sense
object ,atthu k"ma,, as well as, the desires in it ,kilesa k"ma,.
1 1he Path o Purity, Chapter xii & 1he Abhidhamma Chandrika
24 At t achment and Det achment
1hereore, these are the subjectie and the objectie aspects o
attachment.
1
Attachment, greed, lust, desire, and coetousness are some o
the synonyms o k"ma. Once the Buddha said, lrom lust
springs grie and ear, but or those who are wholly ree rom
lust, there is no grie and ear`.
2
In modern society, some psychologists and sociologists hae
recognized that there are two major causes or conlict in
society. As analyzed, the two are fear and necessity, both o
which are predominantly lust embodied. lor the resolution o a
conlict, one should comprehend these two major causes.
\hat our modern educationists say is partly correct, but we
can deinitely say that their deinition is an incomplete one. 1his
is because they see the result and label it as necessity`, but the
cause is hidden. 1he cause or the necessity is lust` or
attachment to possession as one`s own`. So now, it maniests
that eery conlict arises because o one`s fear and lust.
People want more and more things to embrace as their own.
1hey can neer be satisied with what they earn working rom
dawn to dusk. 1hey are discontented, always suering rom
arious kinds o mental and physical ailments.
1he personality that could be microscopically classiied into
mind and matter proes that there is no permanent entity within
onesel. 1here is also nothing to be attached to in this body,
either mentally or physically.
Apart rom the ie aculties o existence, there are no
irreducible substances, which we sometimes think o as leading
1 Jayasuriya \.l., 1he Psychology and Philosophy o Buddhism
2 Dhammapada 215 Vrs
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 25
to a soul. In Buddhism the soul theory is completely denied and
the whole world is reduced into three main characteristics.
1hese are:
Impermanence ,anicca,
Unsatisactoriness ,dukkha,
Soullessness ,anatta,
People grasp things as their own because o their ignorance
and craing. 1hese two principal causes are the piots upon
which the wheel o the birth cycle turns.
Attachment and reulsion are two extremes, being an
extremist how can one be happy in this lie and the lie ater
death. Buddhism inariably emphasizes the need to be detached
rom both extremes.
Being detached ,ieka,, one can be tolerant and understand
what is right and what is wrong, what is good and what is bad,
and what is wholesome and what is unwholesome, and see all
things in the world as they really are.
1he Buddha said, 1hose who can immediately understand
reality can see the bliss o Nibb"na as Nibb"na` ,Nibb"nam
nibb"nato abhij"n"ti,. 1he one who attains ull Lnlightenment is
no longer in the habit o practicing either attachment or
reulsion. le is certainly detached rom all kinds o sensuous
pleasures in the world. \e know that it is the consciousness,
which is coordinated and integrated, yet not the sense base either
internal or external corresponding with or reacting to each other.
1he mind experiences their range and sustenance ,mano nesam
gocara isayam paccanubhoti,, which means that the mind
gauges their nature.
Now, we are aware that one should not be detached rom the
whole o actiities in society or the realization o the Dhamma.
Buddhism teaches us to moe in society while comprehending
the Dhamma in society itsel. In spite o the belie o some
26 At t achment and Det achment
people, the world is not a bad place to lie in. Both good and
bad are in society. 1hereore, one should not be either optimistic
or pessimistic regarding this matter. 1he Buddha adises us to
gie up all sorts o isms` and iews` and een the Dhamma
or the attainment o Nibb"na. In the .tagaaavava vtta o the
Ma;;biva ^i/!,a the Buddha said, Kullupamam bhikkhae
dhammam desiss"mi nittharanatth"ya no gahanatth"ya`.
1o conclude rom this concept, we can state that when one is
steeped in attachment or reulsion one is bound to the world,
and when one is gradually detached rom the two extremes o
attachment and reulsion one can ery soon attain the bliss o
Nibb"na.
2. Ditthi Up!d!na.
Ditthi up"d"na means, speculatie iews`. It is stated in the
1ext, Dhammasangani` ,vaabi.t P.,cbotogicat tbic., as ollows:
1here is no such thing as alms or sacriices or oerings,
there is neither ruit o good or eil deeds. 1here are no such
things as this world` or the next`. 1here are no such things as
mother` or ather`, or beings springing into birth` without
them. 1here are in the world, no recluses or brahmins who hae
reached the highest point who hae attained the height, who,
haing understood and realized by themseles along both this
world and the next, make known the same`.
1
1hese heretical iews are ten in number as stated in many
discourses. 1he Dhammasangani itsel, explains that all kinds o
iews lead to opinions ,ditthigatam,, to a wilderness
,ditthigahanam,, to a puppet show ,ditthiisukam,, to sculing
,ditthi ipphanditam,, to etters ,ditthisamyojanam, and the grip
,gaho, and tenacity o it ,patiggaho, and the inclination towards
1 Buddhist Psychological Lthics p.1215
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 2
it ,abhinieso,, being inected by it ,par"m"so,. 1his by-path
,kummaggo, is a wrong path ,micch"patho, and an institution o
wrong iews ,micchattam titth"yatanam,.
According to the rabva;!ta vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a, there
were 62 wrong iews in the 6th century B.C in India, all o which
can be philosophically placed into the two ollowing groups:
1hey are annihilationism and eternalism - ,Ucchada"da and
Sassata"da,.
Buddhism denies these iews and encourages the attainment
o samm"ditthi or right iew. Samm"ditthi is the irst step o the
Lightold Path ,atthangikomaggo,.
\rong iew always proides an unwholesome and unpleasant
atmosphere. But, right iew is the opposite. 1he Buddha
preached the Dhamma 45 years or the purpose o establishing
right iew or right understanding, as a basis or lie. \hen we
read the Canon, we ind in many Suttas such as |!ti vtta o the
Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, telling us that man`s irst eort is to guide
himsel along the correct path, letting himsel or hersel realize
what is right and what is wrong.
\ith the arising o wrong iews, the unwholesome things not
yet arisen arise, and the unwholesome things already arisen are
brought to growth and ullness. As its repercussion, the
wholesome thoughts not yet arisen are hindered in their arising,
and the wholesome thoughts already arisen disappear, and at the
dissolution o the body, it passes into a way o suering.
1
People or beings are wandering in Sams"ra with a strong
personality-belie ,sakk"yaditthi,. It is the irst o the ten etters
,samyojana, through which beings are bound to the world. On
the other hand, ego-illusion ,atta-ditthi,, eternity belie ,sassata-
ditthi, and annihilation belie ,uccheda-ditthi,, are also
1 A.N. I. 23 Sutta
28 At t achment and Det achment
considered wrong iews. 1he Buddha, the Perect One, is
completely ree rom any theory or iew ,ditthi,. le has seen
what reality is, and also what is corporeality, and how it appears
and disappears. le has seen what eeling is and how it appears
and disappears. le has seen what perception is and how it
appears and disappears. le has seen what mental ormations are
and how they appear and disappear. le has seen what
consciousness is and how it appears and disappears. le has no
inclination to the ainglory o I` and mine`. Casting out all
imagination, he has won complete delierance through the
extinction o deilements or procliity to the same ,anusaya,.
In the .ttba/a 1agga o the vtta ^i!ta, a prominent place
has been gien to the rejection o speculatie iews. 1he so-
called wrong iews` are called ixed destiny`
,niyatamicch"ditthi,. 1hey are said to be the grae oenses,
resulting in the ten unwholesome courses o action ,dasa kamma
patha,.
\hen we urther examine clinging or attachment to iew
,ditthup"d"na,, we can understand that it is a ery dangerous
thing, and could be a turning point in one's religious and social
lie. Attachment to wrong iew is as harmul as intoxicants.
During the time o the Buddha, there were a multitude o
religious iews and against such a background, Buddha arose as
the moon in the sky o Indian society, where a galaxy o stars
,Sangha, also twinkled around the moon.
1he Buddha neer wanted to establish another iew or ditthi
or add more to the popular 62 iews elaborated in the rabva;!ta
vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a. 1he Buddha always stroe to establish
what is called truth`, which is eer present in society but
unortunately concealed by the dust o ignorance and craing.
Some senior contemporaries o the Buddha such as Ajitha
Kesakambala, asserted that any belie in good action and its
reward is a delusion. le neer belieed what is called good and
bad ,ethics,. At death, man would become disintegrated into
the elements`, he said.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 29
But the Buddha through his sublime teaching, perpetually
awakened the people rom the deep slumber o wrong iews. le
adised people to see things as they really are. 1he Buddha neer
wished man to cling to any particular iew. le neither
appreciated clinging to right iews nor to wrong iews.
1he Buddha inestigated the human thought and taught the
way to the eradication o all sorts o iews. 1he great
philosopher, N"garjuna, who introduced M"dhyamaka
philosophy`, said, in his amous work Mvta M!ab,ava/a K!ri/a,
that he, in compassion, pays his obeisance to the Buddha since
he preached Dhamma or the elimination o all sorts o
erroneous iews.
,Sara drustiprah"n"ya - yah saddharmamadesayah
Anukampamup"d"ya - tam namasshy"mi Gautamam,
1
1he Buddha taught us to be igilant in the present and strie
to understand the Dhamma by analyzing and inestigating
careully. At this stage, we should be ery careul because
analysis leads to pluralism and synthesis leads to monism. I it is
so, we hae also unwittingly gone to an extreme and hae
embraced another iew. 1he Buddha rejected this wholly.
In society, there are two predominant iews: Right iew and
wrong iew. Right iew leads to the proper path while the latter
to a wrong road. According to the contemporaries o the
Buddha, such as Ajitha Kesakambala, there were ten wrong
iews. le pointed them out in his teaching as ollows:
Natthi dinnam - 1here is no use o giing
Natthi yittham -1here is no use o oering
Natthi hutam - 1here is no use o liberality
1 Mula M"dhyamaka K"rika, chapter 24. 30 Vrs
30 At t achment and Det achment
Natthi sukata dukkhat"nam kamm"nam phalam ip"ko -
1here is no ruit or result o good and bad actions
Natthi ayamloko -1here is no present world
Natthi paroloko - 1here is no world beyond
Natthi m"t" - 1here is no result o supporting mother
Natthi Pit" - 1here is no result o supporting ather
Natthi satt" opap"tik"-1here are no spontaneous beings
Natthi loke uddham samana br"hman"- In the world there
are no recluses and Brahmins who hae deeloped their
minds.
1
loweer, the Buddha opposed them and clearly pointed out
their contradictions. Ajitha's explanation was a negatie one,
while the Buddha's was a positie one. 1he Buddha himsel said
that the right iews explained by him led to the right path, which
is the Noble Light-old Path. ,Ariyo atthangiko maggo,. 1he
right iew is the irst link o the Light-old Path. In this context,
according to the accaribbavga vtta o the av,vtta ^i/a,a, right
iew means penetratiely understanding the lour Noble 1ruths
,dukkhe n"nam dukkha samadaye n"nam dukkhanirodhe n"nam
dukkha nirodha g"mini patipad"ya n"nam ayam uccati bhikkhae
samm"ditthi,.
2
Right iew is to be cultiated and deeloped,
which ends in the extinction o lust, hatred and illusion ,bh"it"
bahulikat" r"gainaya pariyos"n" hoti, dosa inaya pariyos"n"
hoti, moha inayapariyos"n" hoti,
3
and the realization o the
Dhamma.
1 D.N. S"mannaphala Sutta
2 S.N. xL.1.8. & M.N. 141 Sutta
3 S.N. xL. 1.4.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 31
Once, the Buddha stated that those ten wrong iews ,micch"
ditthi, are een more serious oenses than the ie heinous sins
leading to immediate punishment. ,Panc"nantariya kamma,
namely, matricide, patricide, the murder o an Arahant, shedding
blood o a Buddha, and creation o a schism among the
brotherhood ,Sangha,.
People behae in society according to their iews. \hen they
are ull o wrong iews, we should not expect a righteous way o
lie rom them. 1hey might do anything toward the destruction
o society. On the other hand, when they hold right iews, we
neer expect anything wrong or any eil actiities rom them.
1hereore, right iews are ery signiicant or the betterment o
society.
3. Silabbata Up!d!na.
Attachment or clinging to mere rules and rituals is a popular
practice in many religions. In Buddhist scriptures, it is called
Silabbatup"d"na. 1he Dhammasangani, the book o vvveratiov
of Pbevoveva in .bbiabavva, explains it in Pali as ollows:
1attha Katamam Silabbatup"d"nam, itobahidd" samana
br"hman"nam silena suddhiatena suddhisilabbatena suddhitiya
eerup" ditthi ditthigatam ditthigahanam ditthikant"ro ditthi
ipphanditam ditthi samyojanam gaho, patiggaho abhinieso
par"m"so kummaggo micch"patho micchattam titth"yatanam
ipariyesagaho idam uccati silabbatup"d"nam`.
1he translation is gien as ollows: 1he theory held by
recluses and Brahmins, |who are| outside our doctrine, |thinking|
that, holiness is gotten by rules o moral conduct, that holiness is
gotten by rites, that holiness is gotten by rules o moral conduct
and rites, 1hat kind o iew, this walking in mere iew, this
jungle o iews, this wilderness o iews, this disorder o iews,
shuling o iews, etters o iews, the grip and tenacity o them,
the inclination towards them, the being inected by them. 1his
by-path, wrong road, wrongness, this sectarianism this inerted
grasp, this is called the clinging to rules and rituals`.
32 At t achment and Det achment
1his deinition appears to be airly clear rom the statements
in many Suttas too. In seeing reality, the Buddha rejected mere
rules and rituals and practiced a way o lie that relected wisdom
and restraint. \hen we think o our day-to-day actiities, we can
understand the consequences o taking things to extremes.
According to the teaching o the Buddha, he neer approed or
assented to the taking o any extreme. In his irst sermon itsel,
the Buddha categorically denied the two extremes, which lead to
sensual indulgence and sel-mortiication. I we examine the
history o philosophy, we can understand that the inest lower
o truth bloomed in between two extremes, i.e. in the middle.
1his dialectical teaching can be realized by studying the
philosophical teaching o the Buddha, Plato, and Marx, in detail.
1he Buddha introduced the middle path aoiding the two
extremes while Plato and Marx introduced the Ideal State and
socialism respectiely. 1aking extreme positions means that one
becomes biased. Mere ditthi or iews always lead us to the
wrong path. Mere grasping o Views is a ery unsae step in
one's lie. One o the seen stages o puriication ,isuddhi, is
puriication by knowledge o what is path and what is not path`
,magg"magga nanadassana isuddhi,. 1his knowledge o
puriication helps one to understand the right path. \e should
not also orget here that the third knowledge o puriication is
also the puriication o iews ,ditthiisuddhi,.
Silabbatup"d"na or clinging to mere rules and rituals is the
third actor o the ten etters ,dasasamyojana,. 1he people who
blindly ollow a religion may practice rules and rituals in order to
ulill their secular lie. loweer, they do not know what is right
and what is wrong in the real sense.
listory reeals to us that in eery early society there has been
some sort o rules and rituals or the purpose o placating the
deities. Len in pre-Buddhist Sri Lanka, there hae been many
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 33
cults.
1
In India, this type o rules and ritual were practiced rom
the Vedic period to the end o the Upanishad period. Most
people o that time practiced arious kinds o seere austerities.
Other people o this time were practicing almost animalistic
behaiors such as goatishness ,ajarta, and the laziness o the ox
,go-rta,. 1he Buddha neer adocated these seere austerities
or the realization o Nibb"na at all, and he neer wanted to
create more rules or monks to ollow. \hateer rules were
promulgated by the Buddha relect a gradual deelopment o
monastic rules. le did not want to enorce a seere code o law
as that o Manu.
2
1he Buddha always emphasized equanimity
,Upekkh", in his teaching.
4. Attav!dup!d!na
Now, let us exam the clinging to personality belie
,atta"dup"d"na,. Atta means sel, ego or personality in
Buddhism. But it is a mere conentional expression. 1his term
atta` is o course a controersial term in religions. Some
religions o the world irmly beliee that there is a permanent
entity within us and it transmigrates rom birth to birth. 1hat
eerlasting substance is called atta` in Pali, and "tman` in
Sanskrit.
In Vedic philosophy this doctrine o "tman` ,soul, is highly
emphasized and it aers that there are three types o "tman
namely,
a. Microcosmic soul - Ji"tman
b. Macrocosmic soul - Param"tman
1 Ven. \alpola Rahula 1hera, "listory o Buddhism in Ceylon " and Adhikaram L.\. "Larly listory o
Buddhism in Ceylon"
2 Don Peter \ l A .Buddhist and Benedictine Monastic Lducation Page
34 At t achment and Det achment
c. Cosmic soul - Vis"tman
lor the attainment o salation, one should comprehend
these three types o souls. According to this teaching, salation is
nothing but uniication with Brahma or the Creator God.
loweer, in Buddhism, the Buddha categorically described
the doctrine o soul as being a noxious concept, which preents
the realization o Nibb"na. On one occasion, Ven. S"ti suggested
that there was a permanent soul, which transmigrates rom birth
to birth. But, the Buddha rejected it and clearly said that there is
no soul or any substance |which is| unchanging. In the acca/a
vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a
1
the Buddha replying to Saccaka
said, 1he ie grasping groups are subjected to change,
thereore, there is no soul within the ie aggregates o
existence`. linally, Saccaka had to admit it. Later on, he became
a dedicated deotee o the Buddha.
1his concept o atta` or soul` is rejected een within the
three characteristics o existence in Buddhism, to wit:
Impermanence, unsatisfactoriness, and non-soul.
Attachment to ego-belie is one o the our perersions,
,attasann",. In the Dhammasangani, attachment to the
personality belie is described as ollows, \hen in this world
the ignorant aerage man who perceies not the Noble Ones
and who comprehends them not, nor is trained according to the
doctrine o noble men, as regards:
1. 1he sel as bodily shape or
2. as haing bodily shape or regards
3. bodily shape as being in the sel, or
4. the sel as being in bodily shape or regards
1 M.N. 35 Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 35
5. the sel as eeling or
6. as haing eeling or regards
. eeling as being in the sel or
8. the sel as being in eeling, or regards
9. the sel as perception,
10. as haing perception or regards
11. perception as being in the sel or
12. the sel as being in perception or regards
13. the sel as synergies or
14. as haing synergies or regards
15. synergies as being in the sel or
16. the sel as being in synergies or regards
1. the sel as consciousness or
18. as haing consciousness or regards
19. consciousness as being in the sel or
20. the sel as being in consciousness.
1hen, this kind o opinion, this walking in opinion, this jungle
o opinion, wilderness o opinion, disorder o opinion, shuling
o opinion, this etter o opinion, the grip and tenacity o it, the
inclination towards it, the being inected by it, this by-path,
wrong road, wrongness, this sectarianism, this inerted group,
this is called the theory o the sel.
1
1hese twenty kinds o ego-iew with regard to the groups o
existence are called, the clinging to the personality belie`
1 Psychological Lthics, ,Pali 1ext Society London, 121. P.301
36 At t achment and Det achment
,sakk"yaditthi,. One cannot be a stream-enterer as long as
s/he is in possession of the personality belief. 1hereby, we
can now understand that atta"da is one o the greatest
attachments, which is in other words a major hindrance to the
realization o Nibb"na.
\hen we consider those our ,4, kinds o clinging urther, we
can understand how rigorous and igorous the sense o
perersion is. AS stated earlier according to the commentary,
attachment or up"d"na means irmly grasping`.
\e human beings are born to this world and grasp the world
as i it is our own. Seeing through the eyes, we hasten to grasp
things as i they are our own. learing through the ears, we
hasten to grasp sounds, likewise, by smelling, tasting, and
touching, we hasten to grasp things, as they are real and our
own. 1hrough all these, we practice either attachment or
reulsion. \hen we like a particular sort o thing, we want to
posses it and we strie to attach to it or grasp it. On the other
hand, i we do not like it, we strie to reject it. 1here we practice
reulsion. 1hese two are the extremes.
In many Suttas, the Buddha has clearly pointed out that both
extremes should be aoided by the wise. 1he best example is
gien in the Mah" atiattb!va vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a.
1
1he
Buddha said, 1his is the only way Bhikkhus, or the puriication
o beings` ,ek"yano ayam bhikkhae maggo satt"nam
isuddhiy",.
In this Sutta, emphasizing the our contemplations, namely,
contemplation on the body, eeling, consciousness, and
Dhamma, the Buddha instructed one to contemplate the body in
the body, eeling in the eeling, consciousness in consciousness,
and mental objects in mental objects. 1his is in being ardent,
1 D.N. 22 Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 3
clearly comprehending, mindul, and haing oercome
coetousness and grie in this world ,"t"pisampaj"no satim"
ineyyaloke abhijjh"domanassam,.
Here in this context, the term abhijjh!domanassam is
very important because abhijjh! is covetousness or
attachment, its counter part is domanassa or revulsion.
1hereore, the Buddha's adice here is to oercome both
attachment and reulsion. 1hat is the path prescribed by the
Buddhas or emancipation. It is the only way. \hen one is
neither attached nor repulsed, one can experience equanimity,
which is a uniersal characteristic, that is the complete cessation
o deilements. Buddhism teaches that lie is a grasping process
o phenomena ,dhamma,, which is also causally related and
interdependent. Dhamma has to be realized, experienced, and
comprehended by the indiidual. lor this realization, we hae to
turn inward and begin by understanding things as they really are.
1he Buddha adised us to be mindul in our daily actiities
or the realization o Nibb"na. I we contemplate the ourold
contemplation, which leads to the seen actors o
enlightenment, we can realize Nibb"na aoiding both attachment
and reulsion.
Atta"dup"d"na is, in other words, sakk"yaditthi. It is the
irst o the ten etters ,sanyojana,. 1he Buddha rejected a
permanent entity within ourseles and proed the theory o
soullessness. At the ery outset, he preached on soullessness in
the .vattata//bava vtta o the av,vtta ^i/!,a
1
or the ie
disciples. Len in the discourse o the snake simile
,.tagaaavava vtta,,
2
he explained the same doctrine o
soullessness.
1 S.N. xxii.59 & Vinaya 1.13.14
2 M.N. 22. Sutta. See also Anatta and and Nibbana by Nyanaponika.
38 At t achment and Det achment
f). Upadi and Upadhi
In early Buddhist Suttas, we come across the aboe two
terms, Upadi and Upadhi. 1he dierence between the two does
not clearly come out in the context and thereore a clear
exposition is needed or a better understanding o the Dhamma.
1he Buddha taught the dhamma or the well-being o both
gods and men. 1oday there is a tendency in human society to
seek the Dhamma through books and meditation. 1he central
teachings o the Buddha could be condensed into three
principles, the Dependent Origination, the 1hree Characteristics
o Lxistence, and the lour Noble 1ruths. 1hese central
1eachings could be discoered in the analysis o one's own ie
aggregates o existence ,pancakkhandha,. 1he aboe is meant
when the Buddha said, It is in this athom-long body with its
consciousness riend, that I declare lies the world and the cause
o the world, and the cessation o the world, and the course o
action that leads to the cessation o the world.`
1
So, according to
the teachings o the Buddha, one should understand dhamma
and een the nature o the world through these ie aculties, in
other words, within name and orm ,N"marupa,.
\hen we look into this matter, we can ery well understand
that the term upadi` means the aggregates i.e. ie khandhas. In
order to coney the real meaning o attachment ,up"d"na,, we
should irst realize the dierence between the two terms Upadi
and Upadhi. 1he Pali 1ext Society's dictionary makes it almost
synonymous. But, when we study the terms in many discourses,
speciically, in the vtta ^iata, and the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, we can
see the dierence clearly.
Upadi is always used in conjunction with Sesa
beginning Sa or anu, which then becomes Sopadisesa
1 S.N. 1.ii.3.6. ,Rohitassa Sutta,
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 39
(Sa+upadisesa) or Anupadisesa (Anu+upadisesa).
Sometimes, we even come across the word Nirupadisesa
in some texts.
As said preiously, Upadi means khandha ,aggregates,. So the
term saupadisesa` or sopadisesa` relates to the meaning that
the khandhas or the aggregates are still remaining, and in the
same way the term anupadisesa`, proides the meaning that no
more aggregates are remaining. 1he term Upadi` could be
easily perceied in our canonical texts to depict the meaning o
the ie grasping groups. 1his connotation is ery clearly and
categorically described in the M!gavai,a vtta o the Ma;;biva
^i/!,a
1
as ollows:
lor a long time, indeed, I hae been derauded, deceied,
and cheated by this mind or grasping. I grasped ater material
shape itsel... ater eeling itsel... ater perception itsel... ater
the habitual tendencies themseles always grasping. I grasped
ater consciousness itsel too. Conditioned by grasping ater
these, there was becoming or me, conditioned by becoming
,existence,, birth, conditioned by birth, old age, and dying, grie,
sorrow, suering, lamentation, and despair, come into being.
1his is the origin o this whole mass o anguish.` ,Digharatt"ni
ata bho aham imin" cittena nikato, ancito paladdha, aham hi
rupamyea up!diyam!no up!diyim. Vedanamyea
up!diyam!no up!diyim. sannanyea up!diyam!no up!diyim
sankh"reyea up!diyam!no up!diyim inn"nam yea
up!diyam!no up!diyim tassa me up"d"napaccay" bhao,
bhaapaccay" j"ti, j"ti paccay" jar" maranam sokaparidea
dukkha domanassa up"y"s" sambhaanti eametassa kealassa
dukkhakkhandhassa samudayo hoti-M.N.p.52,.
According to the oregoing statement o the Buddha, one can
understand that the term Upadi` is used in order to explain the
1 M.N. 5 Sutta
40 At t achment and Det achment
ie aggregates or the grasping groups which make one a slae o
craing ,1anh" d"so,.
On another occasion, the Buddha said, Monks, i one clings
he is M"ra`s bondsman, i he clings not he is released rom the
Lil One` ,up!diyam!no kho bhikkhu baddho m"rassa
anup!diyam!no mutto p"pimatoti,.
1he said clinging or attachment, in this Sutta, is also
attachment to the ie grasping groups. It is in the |avi,ati vtta
o the av,vtta ^i/!,a
1
where the Buddha explained this sort o
attachment as lokamisa or the bait o all the worlds. le
expressed that we should reject the bait o all the worlds in order
to attain the inal peace ,Lok"misam pajahe santipekkho,.
1hose who are o the iew that all is pleasing to me` as well
as those who are o the iew that all is not pleasing to me` and
also een those who are o the iew that part is pleasing to me,
part is not pleasing to me` are equally wrong, because they are
obstinately holding to a sort o iew, they are adhering to it, were
to say 1his is indeed the truth, all else is alsehood` ,idamea
saccam moghamannam,. 1he Buddha says in this Sutta,
2
addressing Aggiessana, that there are three eelings, a pleasant
eeling, a painul eeling, and a eeling that is neither painul nor
pleasant. I one eels one o these three eelings, one can only at
that time eel that particular eeling. 1hereore, he is entirely
deoid o the other two. In the same way, the Buddha
expounded that an instructed disciple o the Ariyans turns away
rom all kinds o iews, both attachment and reulsion. 1urning
away rom these extremes is dispassion, being dispassionate, he
can be ree rom all kinds o bonds. le is reed and
comprehending. le has done what was to be done, does not
1 S.N. 1.1.1.3 Sutta
2 M.N. 4 Sutta ,Dighanaka Sutta,
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 41
concur with anyone, and does not dispute with anyone. le
makes use o the common phrases o the world without
adhering to them ,Na kenaci samadati na kenaci iadati yanca
loke uttam tena oharati apar"masan ti ,M. N. p.500,.
In the .v!tbaivai/or!aa vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a,
1
iidly
and categorically it is explained by Ven. S"riputta to
An"thapindika, the householder, while he was on his sickbed.
Ven. S"riputta says,
louseholder! \ou must train yoursel thus ,you must
think,, I will not grasp ater ision and so, will hae no
consciousness dependent on ision. 1his is how you must
train yoursel, householder, you must train yoursel thus: I
will not grasp ater hearing... smelling... tasting... body...
mind material shapes... sounds...smells... taste... touch...
mental objects, and so, will hae no consciousness
dependent on material objects. 1his is how you must train
yoursel householder.
,1asm"tiha te gahapati, eem sikkhitabbam: na cakkhum
upadiyiss"mi. Na ca me cakkhunissitam inn"nam
bhaissatiti. Lam hi te, gahapati sikkhitabbam. 1asm"tiha
te gahapati eam sikkhitabbam: Na sotam upadiyiss"mi.
Na ca me sotanissitam inn"nam bhaissatiti. Lam hi te
gahapati sikkhitabbam. 1asm"tiha te gahapati... gh"nam...
sikkhitabbam. 1asm"tiha jiham... sikkhitabbam.
1asm"tiha k"yam... sikkhitabbam. 1asm"tiha manam...
sikkhitabbam. 1asm"tiha... rupam sikkhitabbam.
1asm"tiha. saddam... 1asm"atiha... gandhan.
1asm"tiha. rasam... 1asm"tiha. photthabbam.
1asm"tiha... dhammam. naca me. Lam hi te gahapati
sikkhitabbam. -M.N.259 P,.
1 M.N. 143 Sutta
42 At t achment and Det achment
In this context too, we can proe that the term upadi has
been commonly and airly used to coney the meaning o
attachment to the ie aggregates o existence.
\e shall now come to the other orm o the term upadhi.
1his also can be coneniently ound in our Buddhist Canonical
1exts`. 1he term upadhi` is always used to bring out the
meaning o attachment to material property or material things.
According to the 1eaching o the Buddha, beings are born again
and again in the sams"ra because o attachment to both material
and immaterial things in the world. 1he term to denote this
meaning is conspicous in the ollowing erse rom the vtta
^i!ta.
Upadhi hi narassa nandan"
Na hi so nandati yo nirupadhihi ,Vr. 33,
It means, Acquisitions are joyul or man, whoeer is without
acquisition does not rejoice. 1hen, again, the next erse o the
same context proides its counter part as ollows:
Upadhi hi narassa socan"
Na hi so socati yo nirupadhi hi ,Vr. 34,
1he meaning: Acquisition is grie or man. \hosoeer is
without acquisition does not griee`. 1hrough these erses, we
can understand that the term upadhi has been used in the
Canon to indicate material goods. \hen we urther examine the
term in the vtta ^i!ta itsel, we come across more instances
about the acquisition o material goods. \hereer the term is
used the meaning is the same i.e. attachment. 1here are many
contexts in the Canonical 1eaching where this latter term is used
to denote attachment to material things. In erse 364, o the
vtta ^i!ta, it is stated that one who dispels his passion and
desire or attachment does not ind anything o the essential` in
acquisitions. Na so upadhisu sarameti-Ad"nesu Vineyya
chandar"gam` But, he would wander properly |without
attachment| in the world ,avv! .o to/e aribba;e,,a,.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 43
According to the Sabhiya Sutta o the Sutta Nip"ta the
Buddha preached to Sabhiya, and at the end, being so delighted,
Sabhiya the \anderer, expressing his pleasure said, \ou are the
Buddha, you are the 1eacher, you are the Sage who oercame
M"ra. laing cut o the latent tendencies, haing crossed oer,
you hae brought these people across. Acquisitions that lead to
rebecoming hae been by-passed by you and your !.ara.
,underlying tendencies,, hae been torn asunder. \ithout
grasping, you hae eliminated ear and dread like a lion`.
1
1his
statement also brings out the meaning o upadhi, as
acquisitions, which lead to rebecoming.
\hateer miseries are described by arious ways and means
in the worldby worldly people through their languages, they all
came into existence with acquisitions, which lead to rebecoming
as their cause. 1hereore, the Buddha instructs, One who
knows, should not make acquisitions, considering that there is
rebecoming and the arising o misery`.
2
1he Buddha in his many
discourses ery clearly has pointed out that misery arises because
o ignorance, and the remedy, he explained throughout 45 years,
is to be wise and igilant. le preached his doctrine to the wise
and showed them how to be wise, because his philosophy guides
one to wisdom. 1he ultimatum or the summum bonum o
Buddhism is the attainment o Perect \isdom.
On another occasion, Venerable Vamgisa was staying with his
tutor, the Venerable Nigrodhakappa. On one occasion, at this
time, disaection arose within him and lust harassed his heart. In
blaming himsel and contemplating within himsel, he uttered:
1 Sutta Nipata 545 & 546 Vrs
2 Sutta Nipata 28 Vr
44 At t achment and Det achment
People always cling to things they touch, perceie, see, and
hear, but the one who suppresses them with his \ill and is
unaected, not adhering to anything, anywhere, that wise person
is called a Seer.`
,Upadhisu jan" gadhit"se
Ditthe sute patighe ca mute
Lttha inodaya chandamanejo
\o ettha na limpati tam muni m"hu, ,S.N.1.iii.1.2. Sutta,.
In this context, things mean material things such as, wealth
and property. 1he Pali term Upadhi` here, reers to the
attachment to things`, what we touch, perceie, see, and hear
etc. 1hese six internal and external bases were discussed aboe
with the term Upadi`.
So, it is now clear that both Upadi and Upadhi gie the
same meaning to attachment but there is a clear distinction
between the two terms, through which the ormer elaborates
attachment to ie aggregates o existence, while the latter one
explains attachment to wealth and property ,material things,.
1hese two kinds o attachment are neer recommended by the
Buddha. Attachment, whether it is to material things or
immaterial things is rejected by the Lxalted One.
It is because o the detachment or the abandonment rom all
sorts o attachment or clinging, that one can be Lnlightened. As
I mentioned earlier, detachment or the abandonment o all sorts
o attachment has been elucidated as Upadhiviveka in some
discourses. In greater discourse to Malunkyaputta,
1
it is said in
Pali katamoca Ananda Maggo Katam" patipad" pancannam
orambh"giy"nam samyojan"nam pah"n"ya. Idha Ananda
bhikkhu upadhiieko akusal"nam dhamm"nam pah"n" sabbaso
1 M.N. 64 Sutta , Malunkyaputta Sutta,
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 45
k"ya dutthull"nam patippassaddhiya iiccea k"mehi iicca
akusalehi dhammehi saitakkham saic"ram iekajam
pitisukham pathamajjh"nam upasampajja iharati`, which
explains, that an uninstructed ordinary person who turning into
the path and getting rid o the ie lower etters ,orambh"giya,,
aloo rom clinging ,upadi,, by getting rid o the unskilled state
o mind by allaying bodily impropriety, aloo rom pleasures o
senses, enters and abides in the irst absorption, which is
accompanied by initial thought and discursie thought, is born
o alooness and rapture and is joyul.
\ith all this eidence, it is proed that the two terms are
harnessed in the canonical teachings to bring out the meaning o
attachment. 1he term Upadi, is mostly used in order to
explain attachment to the ie aggregates o existence. 1he six
senses and their respectie external data are explained as
attachment to the material things in the external world in term o
upadhi.
1hus, this explanation brings us to an end o our brie surey
o the two terms Upadi` and Upadhi`. Now, let us examine
the concept o attachment as it seres in the teaching o
Abhidhammic philosophy, a later deelopment o Buddhist
thought.
g). Up!d! and Anup!d!.
In Abhidhamma the concept o attachment is described in
the third chapter which is known as analysis o matter. In this
chapter, there are 28 elements or matters, which are classiied
mainly into two groups namely:
Mah"bhuta 4 ,the undamental material elements,
Up"d"ya 24 ,deriatie or secondary material properties,
\hen we obsere the latter classiication o the 24 types o
deriaties, we can come to a decision that the deriaties which
dependent on the our undamental elements, show a ery clear
background to the explanation o attachment.
46 At t achment and Det achment
In the course o discussion o attachment and detachment
,Up"d"na and Anup"d"na, it is undoubtedly necessary to clear
out the meaning o Up"d" and Anup"d" which come across in
Buddhist metaphysics i.e. .bbiabavva. In the chapter o analysis
o matter, the term Up"d" is dealt with clear distinction o
matter. Up"d" means deriaties as stated preiously.
Up"d" rupa or deriaties are again diided into two groups
as nippanna ,concretely produced, and anippanna ,non-
concretely produced,. 1here are 14 nippanna and 10 anippanna.
O the two groups, the ormer is ery important in the sense
o deriaties. 1hey are arranged into pairs as ollows: 1. up"d"
and anup"d", 2. up"dinna and anup"dinna, 3. up"dinnup"d"niya
and anup"dinnu-p"d"niya, 4. sanidassana and anidassana, 5.
sappatigha and appatigha, 6. indriya and naindriya, . mah"bhuta
and na mah"bhuta, 8. innatti and na innatti, 9. cittasamutth"na
and na cittasamutth"na, 10. cittasahabhu and na cittasahabhu,
11.cittanupariatti and na cittanupariatti, 12. ajjhattika and
b"hira, 13. ol"rika and sukhuma, and 14. dure and santike.
1
I we are aware o the 24 deriaties, we can then easily
understand their role in the sense o up"d"na or attachment. 1he
deriaties are classiied as, 1. 1he sensitie parts o the ie
organs ,pas"darupa, i.e. eye, ear, nose, tongue and body, 2. 1he
sense-ields, which sere as supports or the sense-cognition to
arise ,gocararupa,. 1hese sense ields are: color, sound, odor, and
taste, 3. Masculinity and emininity which are collectiely called
bh"arupa, 4. 1he seat o consciousness ,hadayaattu,, 5.
Psychic lie ,Jiitindriya,, 6. Nutritie essence, which sustains the
physical body ,"h"ra,, . Space ,"k"sa or pariccheda, 8.
Communicating and understanding o intention ,innatti,, 9.
Changeability o rupa ,ik"rarupa,, 10. Characteristics ,lakkhana,.
1 Karun"d"sa \. Buddhist Analysis o Matter P.102
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 4
\hen one considers all these orms o matter one by one,
one can clearly comprehend that any sort o matter is not in the
process o distorting one's mind, but because o one's
attachment, one becomes ignorant. I we study urther, it is
understood that the ie sensitie parts o the organs are not
craing. 1he composite eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body consist
o our essentials, which sere as bases or the concomitant
subjects or the senseields. Mere existence o the ie bases and
the respectie sense-data do not produce deilements nor are
they connected to each other. It is with the support o one's
consciousness ,inn"na, that one can see, hear, smell, taste, or
touch as a communicatie basis or grasping.
1he rest o the deriaties namely: Bh"a, ladaya, Jiita,
Ah"ra, Pariccheda, Vinnatti, Vik"ra, and Lakkhana are sered in
this connection as supportie elements or clear correspondence.
lrom what we hae obsered so ar, it should become clear
that the so-called being or satt"` is nothing more than the ie
aggregates ,groups, o existence or material and mental
phenomena.
All 24 deriaties gie help or better cognizance. 1he person
who is uninstructed, grasps with what he can cognize and as a
result, he becomes a slae o craing. Abhidhamma teaches us
that the up"d" or deriaties those that take hold, are dependent
upon the our primary elements`. 1ogether with these our
primary elements, so-called being comes into existence.
1he ie Nik"ys themseles hae alluded to the dangers o
Up"d" or Up"d"na, the clinging to the whole world. Apart rom
this, Abhidhamma through its teaching o elements reeals that
grasping or attachment to anything brings misery in the whole
circle o Sams"ra. 1hat is why the teaching o anup"d" or
detachment is to be practiced by onesel, with the idea o
eradicating deilements.
I one keeps away rom grasping one can be content, because
he can comprehend that he is ree rom bondage and iews.
48 At t achment and Det achment
1hat is what Buddhism teaches rom the beginning to the end in
its philosophy.
h). Up!dinna and Anup!dinna
According to the implication o the Abhidhammic
classiication o matter, these are two terms in the
Dbavva.avgivi. It is stated in P"li atthi rupam-up"dinnam, atthi
rupam-anup"dinnam` which means, that there is matter within
Up"dinna ,internal matter, and Anup"dinna ,sometimes internal
and sometimes external,. 1he term Up"dinna is in the positie
sense, while the latter is in the negatie.
It is explicitly explained in the Dhammasangini, that there are
two types o matter namely, interior and exterior. Matter, which
is interior, is Up"dinna. Lxterior is sometimes Up"dinna, then at
times is Anup"dinna. ,\am tam rupam ajjhattikam tam
up"dinnam. \am tam rupam b"hiram tam atthi up"dinnamatthi
anup"dinnam,.
Up"dinna produces the meaning o that which has been
appropriated or clung to because they hae been acquired as a
ruit o kamma motiated by craing and wrong iew. 1he
matter, rupa, which are clung to are the ie institutions namely,
eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body ,cakkh"yatanam, sot"yatanam,
gh"n"yatanam, jih"yatanam, k"y"yatanam, and then the matter
o external sense-data are gien as ollows, in the
Dhammasangani in P"li. Itthindriyam, purisindriyam,
jiitindriyam, yam a panannampi atthi rupam kammassa katatt"
rup"yatanam sadd"yatanam gandh"yatanam ras"yatanam,
potthabb"yatanam, "kasadhatu, "podhatu, rupassa upacayo,
rupassa santati, kabalink"ro "haro, idamtam b"hiram
up"dinnam`.
It consists o the eight indriya-rupas, namely, the ie sense-
organs, the two aculties o sex, and the aculty o lie.
It should be noted here, that according to the classiication o
matter in the Dhammasangani, what is called up"dinna rupa`
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 49
comes into being through the action o Kamma ,kammassa
katatt",.
1here is another group o Up"dinna, which is sometimes
Up"dinna, and sometimes anup"dinna. It consists o eleen
items namely, the our mah"bhuta, rupa, gandha, rasa, "hara,
"kasadh"tu, upacaya, and santati. 1hese items represent the type
o matter with which the indriya-rupa are also associated.
Lenthough the indriya-rupa are dierent rom this group, they
cannot exist independently or without being supported by the
our elements ,Mah"bhuta,. Again, the our elements cannot
exist independently rom the our up"d"rupa, namely: rupa,
gandha, rasa, and "hara.
1here is another group o matter in the Dbavva.avgavi that
which is inariably anup"dinna. It is the negation o up"dinna. It
also consists o eight items, namely, two innatti ,k"yainnatti
and aciinnatti,, the triad o lahut", mudut", and kammannat",
jarat", aniccat", and sadd" ,Sadd"yatanam, k"yainnatti, rupassa
lahut", rupassa mudut", rupassa kammannat", rupassa jarat",
rupassa aniccat"... idam tamrupam bahiram anup"dinnam,.
O this classiication, the irst ie are described elsewhere in
the Dhammasangani in the category o cittasamutthana.
1
loweer, the two terms Up"dinna and Anup"dinna, as I
comprehend, are widely expressible terms, and een the meaning
is perhaps, ungraspable within the context o .bbiabavva and
.bbiabarvaKo.ba.
Pro. \. Karun"d"sa, an erudite Abhidhammic scholar, abun-
dantly and analytically exposes the discrepancies o the two
terms as depicted both in the Abhidhamma and in the
.bbiabarvaKo.ba in his great work vaabi.t .vat,.i. of Matter.
2
In
1 Dhammasangani P.60-3
2 Karun"d"sa \. Buddhist Analysis o Matter Chapter 6
50 At t achment and Det achment
his inaluable work, he points out the opinion gien by Pro. De
la Valee Poussin regarding the two terms Up"dinna and
Anup"dinna. It is said, that the two terms are coneying the
same sense as Up"tta and Anup"tta in .bbiabarvaKo.ba 1his
analysis comes in Verse Number 10 o Chapter 1 ,Abhidharma
Kosha,.
According to the description gien, there are two types o
matter which may be classiied into two groups, 1. By color
,Varna, and 2. By orm ,samsth"na,, or into twenty groups such
as blue, red, etc., or long, round, etc. ,rupam didha
imshatidh"...,. 1he elaboration o Up"tta and Anup"tta could
be seen in the category o sound ,sadda, o which there are eight
kinds ,shabdastashtaidhah rasah,. 1hose eight are two kinds o
speech or communication artiicially produced by beings with
the aid o elements. ,Up"tta mah"bhuta hetuka, and two kinds o
speech produced naturally by the great elements without the aid
o beings such as that o trees, riers etc. ,anup"tta mah"bhuta
hetuka,.
Lach o these our can be pleasant or unpleasant ,manojna or
amanojna,. 1hus, it all becomes eight types. It must be
comprehended here, that the .bbiabarvaKo.ba implies the two
terms Up"tta and Anup"tta in order to represent attachment or
clinging to the inward and outward matter o the so-called`
beings. Now, I wish to suggest that the two terms gien in the
.bbiabarvaKo.ba ,up"tta and anup"tta, are, in this sense, more
similar to the terms Upadi and Upadhi respectiely, which
were examined in the preceding discussion.
\ith the idea o clear understanding these two terms, I
suppose, we are now in a better position to come to a surey o
its usage in the Suttas. \hen we look into this matter in clear
perception, we can easily and reasonably understand the
interpretation gien to Up"dinna and Anup"dinna in the context
o original Suttas.
1he discourse o the analysis o the elements ,Dbatvribbavga
vtta, in the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, coneys the meaning o the term
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 51
Up"dinna as an element o extension ,pathai,, an element o
liquid ,"po,, an element o radiation ,tejo,, an element o motion
,"yo,, an element o space ,"kasa, and the element internal
,ajjhattika,, as well as external ,b"hira,.
1
1he same description is
also gien in the Mab! attbiaaoava vtta and Mab! Rabvtoraaa
vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a.
2
Ven. Ny"natiloka deines it ,Up"dinna, as karmically acquired
corporeality or matter clung to by Kamma, in his amous work,
vaabi.t Dictiovar,.
3
\ith concern as to the aboe mentioned explanations, we
can catch a glimpse o an idea about the two terms with regard
to attachment and detachment`. 1he term Up"dinna bends
more to attachment while the Anup"dinna is more to
detachment with reerence to our topic.
i). Sopadisesa and Anupadisesa.
In the oregoing study o attachment, ocusing speciically to
being ,satt",, we considered about ie groups o existence and
ie grasping groups o existence.
Len beore the emergence o Buddhism in India, the then
prealent religious currents such as Lternalism and Nihilism
taught some sort o delierance to their ollowers. \e know well
that there were six renowned teachers at the time, who were
contemporaries o the Buddha yet senior to him. 1hey, through
their teachings prescribed a way o emancipation and
delierance.
1 M.N. 140 Sutta
2 M.N. 1. 28 Sutta
3 Ny"natiloka, Buddhist Dictionary. See. Up"dinnarupa
52 At t achment and Det achment
Prince Siddh"rtha, as a seeker o truth, neer denied their
teachings but inestigated more and more, and as a consequence
o his unlimited obseration and experimentation he could,
through introersion, comprehend what is called Nibb"na or the
highest goal. Literally, Nibb"na means extinction o craing,
,nir-"na,, i. e. extinction o greed, extinction o hatred, and
extinction o delusion. In other words, it is the ultimate and
absolute delierance rom all uture rebecoming, old age, disease,
and death, rom all suering and misery.
1he particular two terms oaai.e.a and .vvaai.e.a are
always used in conjunction with Nibb"na, which then becomes
Sopadisesanibb"na or the negation Anupadisesanibb"na. 1hese
two terms are elaborated in many Suttas in the Canon.
Sopadisesanibb"na is the ull extinction o deilements i.e.
Nibb"na with the groups o existence ,ie aggregates, still
remaining. 1his takes place at the attainment o Arahantship or
perect loliness. Gotama the Buddha attained
Sopadisesanibb"na at the oot o the Bo tree at Buddhagaya in
India on a lull Moon Day o Vesak. Nibb"na without groups
remaining is called Anupadisesanibb"na. 1his is the termination
o the existence o the psycho-physical process. It takes place at
the death o the Arahant.1he Buddha passed into
Anupadisesanibb"na ,Parinibb"na, at Kusinagar, India at the age
o eighty ,80,.
Being an Lnlightened One, the Buddha spent 45 years
teaching and preaching what he comprehended through his
intuitie wisdom. 1he Buddha pronounced that it is an
achieement open to anyone who earnestly stries or perect
purity and wisdom. 1here hae been Buddhas in the dim past
and there will be Buddhas in the uture at the proper time, when
conditions are aorable. All past the Buddhas had attained this
state o Nibb"na and the Buddhas in the uture, too, will attain
the same state o Nibb"na. Now, it is appropriate to study the
discrepancy within the two states o Nibb"na. Delierance,
according to Buddhism, comes not rom belie in others or
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 53
through supposed supernatural agencies but through insight won
entirely by the indiidual's own eorts.
Ater realizing Nibb"na as Nibb"na, he or she remains in
communion with the aggregates. le or she then experiences that
happiness o Nibb"na known as Sopadisesanibb"na, which
produces the reedom or purity o a mind deeloped in ull
knowledge.
1
It should be emphatically stated here that the one
who attains ull Lnlightenment experiences the bliss o Nibb"na
during his lietime. It is not ater death.
Ater the elimination o all sorts o deilements, he lies in
society without Up"d"na or Attachment to any thing in the
world. le does not hae the ie grasping groups
,pancup"d"nakkhandh", but only the ie aggregates
,Pancakkhandh",, namely, rupa ,body,, edan" ,eeling,, sann"
,perception,, sankh"ra ,olitional ormation,, and inn"na
,consciousness,. le knows the ie aculties as ie aculties. le
does not cling to them. le does not acquire merit or demerit
,ormations,. As he is ully awakened, he is always on the alert
with ull wisdom and compassion.
Anup"disesanibb"na or Anupadisesaparinibb"na takes place
at the end o an Arahant's lie. \ith the inal dissolution o the
bodily elements, he attains the State o Nibb"na` without any
substratum o elements where there is no more cause or
rebecoming. Once the Buddha stated, 1ath"gatassa kho
br"hmana "yatim gabbhasseyy" punabbha"bhinibbatti pahin"
ucchinnamul" t"l"attukat" ana bh"akat" "yatim
anupp"dadhamm"`.
1his means that the Buddha is the one who is not destined to
another kind o rebecoming. Indeed brahmin, he is the one
1 Ven. Para"hera Vajiragn"na Mah" 1hera, Buddhist Meditation page .46-469 , Published by Gunasena &
co. Ltd colombo 1962
54 At t achment and Det achment
whose uture conception in a womb, whose rebecoming in a
uture becoming, are destroyed and cut o like a palm-tree at the
root, so utterly done away with that they can come to no uture
existence.
1
What is detachment?
1he word detachment simply denotes the absence o
attachment, but the Buddha categorically denied both
attachment and reulsion. 1hose who neither attach ,cling,
grasp, nor repel rom anything in the world, are called
detached`. 1hey are none other than the Arahants.
Detachment is synonymous with non-attachment the term
has existed in the Lnglish language rom at least the 19th
century. It was meant in usage, simply to detach rom
institutions such as colleges. loweer, we should not orget the
name o Aldous luxley who aced death as braely as he aced
lie according to his doctor, Dr Max Cutler. It was luxley
himsel, who coined the noun non-attachment` in 193 to
denote speciically an attitude o disinterestedness in material
things - and an attitude o detachment in the ace o material
loss, alongwith an attitude o interestedness in charitable actiity.
1he word is now in the Ofora vgti.b Dictiovar,, denoting
unconcern or uninolement with material things.
In regard to the teaching of the Buddha, the term
detachment denotes a deep and profound meaning which
includes the absence of both material things and mental
defilements such as, the underlying proclivities concern to
the defilements (anusaya).
1he terms detachment`, non-attachment`, and
unattachment` occur in the Canonical discourses. 1hey always
1 Vinaya Vol.1. P.6
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 55
reer to detachment rom deilements. 1he Pali equialent to
detachment is Anup"d"na`. \e come across expressions such
as, anup!d!parinibb!yi, anup!diyanto idhav!huramv!,
and anup!d!ya !savehi cittam vimucci etc.
\hen we surey the Buddhist scriptures, we can ind some
inter-related expressions gien within the same contexts. O
these, the term Vieka`, is ery signiicant. Only those who
are detached from all sorts of defilements have Absolute
Viveka or Detachment. 1he term Vieka`, in general, would
mean leisure` in Lnglish.
In Buddhist texts, the word has been genuinely used in the
sense o detachment.
1
1he classic example is gien in the
Dbavvaaaa erse 5 it reads thus:
Ann" hi l"bhupanis" - ann" nibb"na g"mini
Lametam abhinn"ya - bhikkhu Buddhassa s"ako
Sakk"ram n"bhinandeyya -iekamanubruhaye`
,One goal that is sought is the quest or worldly gain, and
quite another is the path to Nibb"na. Clearly understanding this,
let not the monk, the disciple o the Buddha, be carried away by
worldly acclaim, but deelop detachment,.
1he aboe example gies rise to understanding both ways,
one o which is the search or worldly gain, while the other is the
way to Nibb"na. It instructs us to be aloo rom the path o
worldly gain and to strie to practice detachment that leads to
Nibb"na. In this erse, the word Vieka` has been used, in the
sense o detachment.
According to the Mab! ^iaae.a, Vieka or detachment is o
three kinds:
1 Llizabeth J.larris. "Detachment and Compassion in Larly Buddhism". Pg.3. BodhiLeaes, 141
56 At t achment and Det achment
1. Bodily detachment ,k"ya ieka,
2. Mental detachment ,citta ieka,
3. Detachment rom the aggregates o existence ,upadi
ieka,
1
1he 1vrata/a vtta o ^iaae.a explains the three detachments
in Pali as ollows:
i. Katamo K!yaviveko?
Idha bhikkhu iittam sen"sanam bhajati, arannam
rukkhamulam pabbatam kandaram giriguham sus"nam
ana pattham abbok"sam pal"lapunjam. k"yena ca iitto
iharati, So ekogacchati. Lko titthati. Lko nisidati. Lko
seyyam kappati, Lko g"mam pind"ya paisati. Lko
patikkamati. Lko raho nisidati. Lko cankamam adhitth"ti.
Lko carati iharati iriyati attati paleti y"peti, ayam
k"yaieko.
ii. Katamo cittaviveko?
Pathamam jh"nam sam"pannassa niaranehi
cittamiittam hoti.Dutiyam jh"nam sam"pannassa itakka
ic"rehi cittam iittam hoti. 1atiyam jh"nam
sam"pannassa pitiy" cittam iittam hoti.Catuttham
jh"nam sam"pannassa sukhadukkhehi cittam iittam hoti.
Ak"s"nanc"yatana sam"pannassa rupa-sann"ya patigha
sann"ya n"nattasann"ya cittam iittam hoti.
Vinn"nanc"yatanam sam"pannassa "kasananc"yatana-
sann"ya cittam iittam hoti. Akincann"yatanam
sam"pannassa inn"nanc"yatanasann" cittam iittam hoti.
Neasann"-n"sann"yatanam sam"pannassa
"kincann"yatana sann"ya cittam iitam hoti. Sot"pannassa
1 Mah" Niddesa , 1uataka Sutta P.341
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 5
sakk"yaditthiy" icikicch"ya silabbata-par"m"sa
ditth"nusaya iittam hoti. Sakad"g"missa ol"rika
k"mar"gasamyojana patighasamyojana ol"rika
k"mar"ganusaya patigh"nusaya tadekatthehi ca kilesehi
cittam iittam hoti. Anag"missa anusahagata k"mar"ga
samyojana patighanusaya tadekatthehi ca kilesehi cittam
iittamhoti. Arahato rupar"ga arupar"ga m"na uddhacca
aijj" m"n"nusaya bhaar"g"nusaya aijj"nusaya
tadekatthehi ca kilesehi bahiddh" ca sabbanimittehi cittam
iittam hoti ayam cittaieko.
iii. Katamo upadi viveko?
Upadhi uccanti kiles" ca khandh" ca abhisamkh"r" ca
upadhiieko uccati amatam nibb"nam, yo so sabba
samkh"ra-samato sabbupadhi patinissaggo tanhakkhayo
ir"go nirodho nibb"nam. Ayam upadhi ieko ,pp 341-
342,.
1he aboe P"li passages describe the meaning o the three
Vieka respectiely. 1he irst one ,k"yaieka,, is abiding in
solitude ree rom alluring sensuous objects. laing gone orth
one may practice detachment being isolated in each and eery
constant actiity o lie, abiding on a heap o hay, in the open
space, in the orest, cemetery or on top o a hill or else under a
tree. 1hat is how he who practices bodily detachment dwells. In
many Suttas o the Buddhist scriptures, we see that there are
many ollowers o the Buddha, as well as, the ollowers o his
contemporaries, who hae spent most o their time in isolated
places such as orests, hills, and cemeteries.
It was then a well-accepted act that the best place or the
deelopment o one's mind is the orest, this is why people went
to the orest to search or the truth. \e should understand ery
well that truth does not preail only in the jungle. It is to be
ound in society, in the midst o people also. It is true, that when
58 At t achment and Det achment
we go to a orest to meditate we can be natural and concentrate
on particular objects within ourseles undisturbed.
I suppose, it would not be out o place here or me to present
some o my personal experiences in orest lie. lrom my early
days o lie as a monk, I was eager to practice meditation.
Although I had a desire to practice meditation in a orest
hermitage, since I was a noice, I had doubts and also was not
yet permitted to go to a orest hermitage. Ater the G.C.L. A,L
examination, I was determined to practice meditation by mysel.
Day by day and year by year, I stroe to abstain rom
whateer was harmul to my health and my aspiration. Always, I
firmly accepted that the purified life is the best life and also
that human-life is the best in the world system.
linally, I receied an opportunity to go to a orest or the
irst time in my lie in1992. It was at Kekanadura M"tara, where
I spent about 20 days in deep concentration. Aterwards, I went
to 1hailand to practice meditation urther. Ater returning to Sri
Lanka, rom time to time, I went to 1alagala meditatin center in
lorana, \atagala lorest lermitage in Matale, and the
Bambaragala lorest lermitage in Kurunegala.
I wish to disclose here that the most attractie and serene
places were Kakanadura, Bambaragala, and \atagala or
seclusion, because they are exclusiely orest hermitages. \hen I
was in these places, I spent days and nights engaged in
meditation. At times, een snakes, such as the cobra came close
to me and made a strange sound. 1hese days were some o the
more signiicant, unorgettable, and unique in my lie.
\hat I need to stress here is that the lie one leads in a orest
or jungle is completely natural, and there are no unnecessary
sensual burdens. loweer, as I clearly understood it, man is
man's own enemy even in the forest. \hateer natural
sounds made by beings such as birds, monkeys, squirrels, and
snakes, were not so disturbing to me, as much as, the mutterings
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 59
and chattering o those men who had come illegally to cut the
trees down.
1hereore, within my own experience in this context, I can
say with assurance that one should be aloo and separated rom
people, in order to comprehend the real nature o the Dhamma.
1his is the real and actual physical detachment, I hae noted
here. lurther, I re-airm that to be bodily detached ,k"ya ieka,
one must lie in the orest both physically and mentally.
Otherwise, though the body is in the orest, the mind may
remain in the city or at one's home.
Now, let us examine what is citta ieka or mental
detachment. It is the inner-detachment rom sensuous things.
1he oregoing passage regarding the mental detachment briely,
but clearly and accurately, shows the mental process, which
marks the path rom worldly lie to Nibb"na.
Citta or mind, as the Buddha stated in his 1eaching, precedes
all mental states. \e know ery well that eerything in the
unierse is in continuous motion een as we study this subject
right now.
1his including: plants, man, and other beings, who are also in
motion. 1his means, not only liing beings but also the earth as a
unit, the sun, the moon and all the stars are constantly keeping
to their respectie motions. Mind is the only organ that can
discern these motions. As each and eery motion is discernible
to the mind, the sense organs merely assist the mind to discern
them.
1
According to the teachings o the Buddha, heart is the seat o
mind.
2
loweer, mind is not merely conined to one's heart. It is
1 Ranasinghe C.P. 1he Buddha`s explanation o the Unierse P. 88
2 See.Dhammpada Vr.3
60 At t achment and Det achment
spread throughout one's body as the lie aculty. Mind is a
continuous process o on going consciousness through the sense
bases o objectie orms, respectiely. It is a part o perception
o any kind, be it eye, ear, nose, tongue or mind. lor example,
the mere existence o the physical-eye and the object do not
pae the way or perception o the object. It is only through the
projection o consciousness that one can see things or beings.
1his is the result o a conluence o the three ,eye, object, and
consciousness, etc.,.
Buddhism through many ways and means teaches how to
deelop one's mind in order to attain ull state o wisdom. 1he
Buddha haing realized the true nature o mind awakened his
disciples also to realize their own minds, especially by practicing
contemplation o consciousness ,citt"nupassan",. It is one o the
our oundations o mindulness. 1he other three are namely,
the contemplation o body ,k"y"nupassan",, contemplation o
eeling ,edan"nupassan",, and contemplation o mind objects
,Dhamm"nupassan",.
\hen one is ully alert one can lie in society by practicing
these lour loundations o Mindulness`. Addressing the
monks, the Buddha expounded in the Satipatth"na Sutta, as
ollows: 1his is the only way, bhikkhus, or the puriication o
beings, or the oercoming o sorrow and lamentation, or the
destruction o suering and grie, or reaching the right path, or
the attainment o Nibb"na, namely, the lour loundations o
Mindulness` ,ek"yano ayam bhikkhae maggo satt"nam
isudhiy" sokaparidda"nam samatikkam"ya dukkhado-
manass"nam atthangam"ya n"yassa adhigam"ya nibb"nassa
saccikiriy"ya yadidam catt"ro satipatth"n",.
1
lor the culmination o intuitie wisdom one should hae a
turning inward o the mind. \hen one continues mindul
1 D.N. 22. Mah" Satipatthana Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 61
inhaling and exhaling or a considerable time uninterrupted, one
can deelop the state o one- pointedness or sam"dhi. laing
dwelt within this serene concentration, one can then become
aware o the two extremes, attachment and reulsion. Len
then, one could realize detachment, grasping neither extreme but
dwell in the middle. 1hat is what is called citta ieka`.
Now let us understand what is called upadi ieka`. In this
context, we should irst remember that the term Upadi ,with
a short ending,
1
denotes ie grasping groups. Upadhi, ,with a
long ending, denotes attachment to material things. Preiously, I
described that any thing in the world, animate or inanimate, that
becomes an attachment is a bondage or hindrance to the
realization o Nibb"na. Lery one intends to clear away such
bondage and enter the city o Nibb"na, though it is not a city or
a place. It is a particular state o mind, which dawns within us, in
this ery lietime itsel. \hen one is completely released rom
the bondages o attachment o Upadi`, one can experience
what is called Detachment or Vieka`. 1hat is what is called,
|aai 1ire/a in this context, i.e. neither attachment nor
reulsion.
Lobha, Dosa, Moha, & Alobha, Adosa, Amoha.
1be Covevaivv of Pbito.ob, states, that there are six roots or
causes ,hetu, or the arising o a particular consciousness. 1hose
six are negatiely, greed, hatred, and delusion, and positiely,
generosity, loing kindness, and wisdom, respectiely.
According to the Abhidharmic classiication o citta, there are
18 classes o consciousness which are called Ahetuka because
they are deoid o the aboe six causes ,hetu,. 1he remaining 1
classes o consciousness are called Sahetuka because they are
1 \e came across in some places where the term Upadhi` also has been used to denote the ie aculties
o existence but in rare occasion
62 At t achment and Det achment
based on the six causes or roots as stated in the preious
paragraph. In this context, we should not orget that the aboe
18 classes o consciousness themseles are also not deoid o
productie causes ,Nibbattaka hetu,.
Greed, hatred, and delusion are the root causes o all sorts o
unwholesome actiities, thereore, they are known as Akusala
mula, in Abhidhamma. 1he remaining three, greedlessness
,generosity,, hatelessness ,loingkindness,, and non-delusion
,wisdom, are known as Kusala mula because they are the root
causes o wholesome actiities. 1hereore, each o the six is ery
important or the realization o the Dhamma.
1hese six roots are described ery well in the Sutta, the
Vinaya, as well as in the Abhidhamma. In keeping with the
discourses, we can say that one should eradicate all these six
roots or the realization o Nibb"na, as these are the basis or
Anup"d"na.
\hen we think o problems, that hae arisen indiidually, and
socially in the many orms o dukkha, we can understand that all
those problems are based on the aboe sixold roots. It is
because o the structures o selishness that we are attached to
the world. As long as we hae attachment ,up"d"na,, we cannot
get rid o dukkha or suering. \hen we analyze our personal
dukkha using the principle o dependent origination
,paticcasamupp"da,, we see that it is linked with our own sel-
centeredness or selishness. Similarly, when we examine social
problems we ind that they are rooted in social selishness. 1his
selishness is because o attachment. One does not concern
about others happiness or well being, but always about onesel,
one's amily, or one's group only. Such selishness comes rom
craing ,tanh", and attachment ,up"d"na,. Attachment in any
orm is to be aoided in order to realize what is 1ruth, Nibb"na.
a). Lobha (greed)
1his is the irst one o the three unwholesome roots
,akusalamula,, R"ga ,lust,, and tanh" ,craing,, being synonyms.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 63
In this present system o lie, greed sprouts up day by day, in an
unprecedented manner, because o the lack o mindulness, and
wisdom. People more and more hoard wealth and property or
uture use. Unortunately, they donot get the maximum use o
these things as they might die unexpectedly, but on the other
hand, being greedy equates to being selish. \hen one is selish,
the indiiduals or the society can neer expect a beneit or
charity rom them. Selish or greedy people are ery anti-social
and could be compared to a well in a orest rom which people
cannot obtain water or their daily needs.
Greed makes many problems o a personal-kind as well as o
a social-kind een more intractable. Consequently, we can see
the amassing o wealth is spreading in the world while poerty is
increasing rapidly. 1oday most o our people are in a rat race to
earn more and more money by any means. 1hey are competing
with each other and as a consequence o this that human alues
and norms are not respected in society.
As discussed so ar, greediness is unwholesome. People
commit more and more unwholesome deeds ,akusala kamma,,
thereore, they deiate away rom the path o Nibb"na. 1his is
how greed keeps people away rom Nibb"na.
b). Dosa (hatred)
1his is the second unwholesome actor. It also keeps people
away rom the path o Nibb"na. Once the Buddha said, latred
is neer appeased by hatred`. In order to appease hatred one
should practice non-hatred or metta. People deelop hate when
they cannot get something they want or wish to attach to, but
they are not aware that hatred is an extreme. Aersion is a
synonym or hatred.
\hen we do not like some one or some thing, we then
become angry but it is not the Dhammic way o lie. One should
understand the real situation o things in the world. I we are
wise enough to see things as they really are in the world, there is
nothing to grasp or repulse. Dosa or anger is also a powerul
64 At t achment and Det achment
deilement to be completely eradicated by the wise or the
realization o Nibb"na. Synonymous terms or the word anger
are aersion, ill-will, and wrath. \hen one is angry, one might
wish to strike, harm, destroy, or kill. loweer, we should be ery
careul to understand that all these things are destructie and
unwholesome. \e always become inoled in unwholesome
actions ,akusala kamma, because o our delusion.
c). Moha (delusion)
1he best-known synonym or moha is aijj" ,ignorance,.
Beings are born again and again in Sams"ra and suer oer and
oer again, as human beings or other beings, because o the
existence o ignorance. As long as we hae ignorance, we cannot
realize the state o Anup"d"na, Detachment.
1he Buddha preached the Dhamma or the cessation o
ignorance. 1he direct opposite o ignorance is wisdom and
Buddhism is based on wisdom. Once, the Buddha said that
his Dhamma is not for fools but for the wise
,pann"antass"yam dhammo n"yam dhammo duppannassa,.
\hen one is led by delusion or ignorance, one cannot see
things as they are, but sees things as permanent and belonging to
onesel, but this is not the reality in the world. 1he wise can
understand that there is nothing permanent in the world.
Deluded people are always deiating rom the Lightold Path
while the wise ollow the Path` properly. It is because o
delusion or ignorance o the Dhamma that people become
aerse or attached. 1hereore, attachment, aersion, and
delusion are unwholesome and always make our minds impure.
1he teaching o the Buddha is to extirpate those three roots. le
adised us to cultiate mindulness in order to puriy our minds.
Puriication o mind is needed or our daily actiities and or the
realization o Detachment ,Anup"d"na,. lor this purpose, the
Buddha prescribed the deelopment o 1he lourold
Contemplation` and 1he 1hree Roots o \holesome Actions`
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 65
namely alobha ,greedlessness,, adosa ,hatelessness,, and amoha
,non-delusion or wisdom,.
1he cultiation o these three: non-greed instead o greed
,alobha,, non-hate instead o hate ,adosa,, and true
understanding instead o delusion ,amoha,, brings about
Detachment, Anup"d"na. \hen one practices alobha, he
deelops generosity, when one practices adosa, he promotes
loing kindness, and when one practices amoha, he deelops
wisdom. 1he aim o the Buddha's teaching is the deelopment
o wisdom and attainment o nibb"na. 1he one who has
deeloped wisdom in this manner is called bhuripanna`
,Arahant,
1
. 1his is Anup"d"na achieed.
\e can easily comprehend the way one becomes attached to
things or people or other beings. \hen one is meditatie and
mindul suiciently, one would be able to mark how the
consciousness is unctioning. \e hae ie senses and our mind
or consciousness is always ready to receie a message rom
anyone o these. As we perceie something through the senses,
our consciousness decides to respond to it either negatiely or
positiely. I the response is negatie, we do not want to take it
as our own so we reuse it instead, this is reulsion. On the other
hand, i the response is positie, we like it and strie to grasp it
as our own, that is attachment.
Both o these lead to tendencies, which make us unhappy and
repelled. As long as we are under the inluence o ignorance
,moha,, we are susceptible to attachment and reulsion. But i
we can practice critical awareness at eery moment, we can
understand it and make it better. 1his is why sel-awareness is so
important in the teaching o the Buddha. Ior one's daily life,
one should meditate even if only for a few minutes and
1 S.N. ii.2.2. & Su.N. 348
66 At t achment and Det achment
keep up constant awareness as far as possible. 1hose who
are wise, practice the Dhamma in their daily lie silently and are
well aware o their thoughts. 1hey spend a ery simple but noble
lie in the world amidst all the ormidable phenomena, such as
disease, decay, and death.
As said earlier, both attachment and reulsion are not
endowed with the Dhamma, because the Dhamma represents
the Miaate !a, or Miaate Patb. 1his \ay or Path is impartial and
suitable or all liing beings to ollow. Aoiding the two
extremes, one must wisely understand Anup"d"na or
detachment as detachment. I one takes detachment` to an
extreme, this would be a wrong iew or opinion, in turn, leading
to the incurable disease o clinging itsel. As mentioned the
noun, non-attachment, was coined by luxley ,193, to
denote detachment or non-clinging to things. loweer,
detachment has a deeper meaning. \hile in 1hailand, in 1995, I
had some discussion with 1hera"da monks on this topic. 1hey
also accepted that the term, detachment`, gies much deeper
meaning than non-attachment. One should not come to a hasty
conclusion by mere reading or hearsay, but should be igilant
and wise to understand and experience reality in the world.
According to Buddhist scriptures, this term has been used to
denote a certain state o mind, which characterizes calmness,
serenity, and equanimity. 1hereore, one should be keen to
understand it clearly according to the context: Detachment is
not only being detached from attachment but also being
detached from aversion or revulsion. Non-attachment` on
the other hand, does not bring out the meaning o being at rest,
seclusion ,ieka,.
1
1 Ven. Ny"natiloka, Buddhist Dictionary, Published by Singapore Buddhist Meditation centre. 198.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 6
In the irst absorption, it reads in Pali, Viiccea k"mehi
iicca akusalehi dhammehi saitakkam saic"ram iikajam
pitisukham pathamajjh"nam upasampajja iharati.`
1
lere the word Viicca` means detachment. Viiccea
k"mehi` reers to bodily detachment. Viicca akusalehi
dhammehi` reers to detachment rom karmically unwholesome
things, which are mental detachment.
1he word iekajam` reers to the arising |o rapture|
rom detachment o the ie hindrances namely: Sensuous desire
,k"macchanda,, ill-will ,y"p"da,, sloth and torpor
,thinamiddha,, restlessness and scruples ,uddhaccakukkucca,,
and skeptical doubt ,icikicch",. As the word detachment` is
ery subtle in meaning, it should be understood by being
indierent. It is achieed not by one's emotions, but by
knowledge and wisdom.
1he word describes the type o state o mind, which is
neither attached to anything nor repulsed by anything, calmness,
coolness, and serenity o mind are apparent in this state.
In other words, this is the state o Nibb"na, which is
ineable. 1hese characteristics are beyond words, extra-erbal.
Language is not suicient to express such supreme qualities
within ourseles.
2
\e beliee that erbal knowledge cannot describe the inal
meaning o Anup"d"na. 1here are many instances in the canon,
which proe that some monks and lay people hae realized
impermanence through wisdom, and attained Nibb"na by seeing
or perceiing the slightest thing such as the alling o a lea or
1 D.N. 2 Sutta , S"mannaphala Sutta,
2 Asanga 1ilakaratne. Nir"na and Ineability ,A study o the Buddhist theory o reality and language,
P.103
68 At t achment and Det achment
drying up o water etc. 1hat is the realization. 1his experience is
quite inexpressible. \e do not need to go ar to understand this
act, stated aboe. lor instance, can we express erbally the taste
o a cup o tea, not really! 1hereore, by this example, we can
conclude that language is not powerful enough to express
our experience, especially what results from the
development of our mental faculty.
1he Buddha himsel said that he uses language without
getting inoled, only or the purpose o general conentions.
1
1hereore, we can clearly understand that moha` or delusion
is the root cause or attachment, as well as, reulsion. It is
because o these three, we are entangled in the web o
deilements by either the clinging or aersion in our daily lies.
Anup"d"na, ieka, or detachment is not an extreme like
clinging or aersion, it is a state o calm detachment` - a very
positive state.
##########
1 D.N. I. Page 202.
CHAP1LR 1WO
PRINCL SIDDH#R1HA AND HIS
UNAIDLD IN1UI1IVL WISDOM
i). His Birth and Mindfulness
In the preceding chapter, we deoted time to examine the
meaning o attachment ,Up"d"na, and detachment ,Anup"d"na,
in general. In this chapter, we hope to discuss Privce iaab"rtba
ava bi. .ecvtar tife, rbicb tea to bi. ivtvitire vvaiaea !i.aov.
Considering some later exaggerations in Buddhist Literature, our
attempt here is to oer some critical analysis, ocusing on the
1ripitaka. Special attention will be gien to the Sutta Pitaka.
It is a act, that there are exaggerations in literature. In
Buddhism, een in the 1ripitaka 1ext, embellishments can be
ound. Neertheless, the real teachings o the Master are eer
glistening like gems in the midst o pebbles. I we are mindul
and sel critical, we can perceie the truth. 1he Buddha, in his
discourses clearly pointed out the need to be critical een about
the Buddha`s own claim to be a Sel-Awakened One` or not,
,Vimamsakena bhikkhae bhikkhun" parassa cetopariy"yam
0 At t achment and Det achment
aj"nantena 1ath"gate samannesan" k"tabb", samm" sambuddho
" no " iti inn"n"y"ti,.
1
In the scriptures, we do not come across a continuous
account o the lie o the Buddha. In order to introduce tales o
the Buddha`s preious births, commentarial literature tells us o
incidents rom the Buddha`s lie that are releant to a particular
J"taka story only. 1he commentator o the Buddhaamsa
speciies the arious places, where the Buddha kept his Rainy
Retreat` during the rainy seasons in the irst twenty years o his
Ministry.
\e can collect data about the Buddha`s lie rom the Sanskrit
works also, as they gie a quite similar narration to the lie o
Siddh"rtha and the Buddha much like the P"li accounts. 1he
Mab!ra.tbv and the atitari.tara,a are two such Sanskrit works.
As in the Pali Scriptures we do not get a continuous account
o the Buddha`s lie, we will hae to examine ery careully some
Suttas o the Sutta Pitaka in a comparatie assessment. In many
Suttas, there are reerences to the Buddha's lay lie. In order to
understand this earlier potion o the Buddha's lie, we can
examine the .ri,aari,e.ava vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a irst.
According to this Sutta, the great renunciation is not as we
hae traditionally been told. ,1here is neither Channa nor
Kantaka etc,. It is said that the Buddha, in the time beore
gaining enlightenment, let home and went orth while ery
young as his unwilling parents were weeping and wailing. 1he
Buddha said, Being young, my hair coal-black, possessed o
radiant youth, in the prime o my lie, although my unwilling
parents wept and wailed, haing cut o my hair and beard,
haing put on yellow robes I went orth rom home into
1 M.N. I.4 Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 1
homelessness`.
1
,Daharoa sam"no susu k"lakeso bhadrena
yobbanena samann"gato pathamena ayas" ak"mak"nam
m"t"pitunnam assumukh"nam rudant"nam kesamassum
oh"ret" k"s"y"ni atth"ni acch"det" ag"rasm" anag"riyam
pabbajim,.
Chronologically, Prince Siddh"rtha was born in 623 B.C. to a
King in Northern India o the warrior race o Sakyans, bearing
the amily name o Gotama.
2
Accepting the date o his birth, he
then went orth in 594 BC, attained Lnlightenment in 588 BC,
and passed away into Parinibb"na in 543 BC. loweer, we
should not orget that scholars hae not yet reached the
conclusion o these acts because o the lack o archaeological
and historical eidence. It is most likely that he, prince
Siddhartha, was born in the 6
th
century BC in India, though there
is no conormity amongst scholars on this matter. 1here were six
teachers, who were senior contemporaries o the Buddha, by
names: Niganthan"tha putta, Makkhaligos"la, Pakudhakacc"na,
Ajithakesakambala, Sanjaya Bellatthi putta, and Purana Kassapa.
\hen considering the description o the birth o Prince
Siddh"rtha, there are apparent exaggerations within the literature,
howeer, we cannot draw a strict line between literary
embellishments and Canonical accounts.
3
Our aim here is to ind
some acts that are more reliable. Undoubtedly, in the Buddhist
literature, there are some interpretations and conceptions which
are supernatural and beyond empirical eriication, but we
should try to relate to the world in which we lie. Prince
1 M.N. I.26 Sutta
2 Jayasuriya \.l. 1he Psychology and Philosophy o Buddhism- P. xiii. Published by \MBA Colombo-
1963
3 Ldward J 1homas ,1he lie o Buddha. P.1
2 At t achment and Det achment
Siddh"rtha was born to this world as a human being. I we can
accept this act, we must discuss things on this basis.
In any religious teaching, there is, to a certain extent, a
growth o apocryphal additions as well as supernatural accounts
o the Masters. In the teaching o the Buddha, we come across
such things like miracles at birth and death. In this matter, I am
also reluctant to accept some o the exaggerated accounts about
his birth and death. 1he Buddha himsel did not like to perorm
miracles during his lietime. Once, he thoroughly rebuked a
certain monk or such actiities.
1
Although miraculous perormances are unpalatable to
modern society, some miracles at the eent o the Supreme
One`s birth and death may hae been possible. 1hese are not
things orced by gods or demons but certain natural changes in
the world. In some Suttas, we ind these miraculous things
occurring in the lie o the Buddha. In the Mab!aa!va vtta o
the Digba ^i/!,a,
2
the Buddha explained some natural laws
,dhammat", pertaining to the Bodhisatta Vipassi who arose in
the world ninety-one eons ago, and the same natural laws as they
apply to the Buddhas Sikhi, Vessabhu, Kakusanda, Konagamana,
Kassapa upto and including himsel, Buddha Gotama, extending
or a period o thirty-one eons.
In his explanation, the Buddha gae all the ollowing: 1he
eon in which each Buddha arose, the social rank, amily, lie-
span, the kind o tree under which each attained Lnlightenment.
In addition, the names o his two chie disciples, the number o
the Arahants present at assemblies, the name o the usual
attendant Bhikkhu, and the name o that Buddha`s mother and
ather, and birthplace. In accordance with this Sutta, such natural
1 Vin. II. P.110 and also see DhA. iii.P 201, DPPN Vol.II. P.203
2 D.N. II.1. Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 3
happenings and laws are ery common to all Bodhisattas.
loweer, the story related here is not about Siddhartha Gotama,
but about Vipassi ,how he was born, brought up, went orth
ater seeing our signs ,an aged man, sick man, corpse and
recluse,, and attained Lnlightenment.
lrom the knowledge we hae gleaned so ar, rom this Sutta,
we can surmise that the story o Prince Siddh"rtha has also been
compiled in its current orm, under the literary inluence rom
the story o the Buddha Vipassi. 1hus, a deout Buddhist may
say that the story o a Buddha is common to all Buddhas, but it
is unpalatable to intellectual people. I we accept this as a act,
we all would all into the lap o atalism where ate is highly
accepted. In light o the Buddha's teaching, we can understand
that the story o Gotama the Buddha should dier rom that o
the others. 1hereore, we may assume that the lie o Siddh"rtha
is rather an extraordinary one, and should not be some thing
supernatural nor necessarily be the same as the story o Vipassi
Buddha.
As we said earlier, Prince Siddh"rtha was born in the North
o India, in the 6
th
century BC.
Some
Suttas, like the a//bava vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a, illustrates the
32 Physical Marks o a Mah"purisa ,mah"purisa lakkhana,. Some
o these described marks are quite unnatural such as a ery large
tongue ,pahuta jiha,, webbed hands and eet, like a net
,j"lahatthap"do,.
1
\e cannot enisage a human being with such marks as those
described on the Buddha. 1he idea o a superhuman or a
Mah"purisa is that one has deeloped one`s mind to its greatest
limit. In Buddhism, we learn about people who do hae
extraordinary characteristics, that is true. Len the Buddha is
purported to hae had some highly unusual marks upon his
Mah"purisa according to the early Buddhism is an Lnlightened One.
1 D.N. Lakkhana Sutta, Sn.Sela Sutta, D.N. Ambattha Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda
physical body at birth. 1he physical perection o a person or
lack there o, will depict the character o one's personality. \hen
one's characteristics are exaggerated one may become eil or a
person who has neer come to exist in the world. R"machandra
P"ndeya says, 1he idea o Superman or Mah"purisa with mental
and een physical perection is deinitely a later growth in
Buddhism. It is the result o a later thinking process o the
Buddhists. \hen the ideal o |an| Arahant ailed to appeal to
them, they wanted some higher substitute to replace the old
ideal`.
1
Against this background, we can now examine how Prince
Siddhartha spent his teenage years in the palace. According to
some literary sources, the prince spent most o his time inside
the palace ground and he knew nothing o sorrow, old age,
sickness, or death. loweer, i we are intuitie enough we can
come to the reasonable conclusion that the Prince was not so
conined to the palace as described in the later compilations.
In many Suttas, the Buddha has propounded that suering
maniests eerywhere in the world. 1he world itsel, according to
his teaching is not only the material world o phenomenal but
also the world within onesel.
2
\hoeer is born to this world has to undergo suering. 1hat
is the most intrinsic eature in the lie o a being. 1he Buddhas
are born to discoer the truth, which is coered with ignorance
,aijj",. Prince Siddh"rtha, according to our iew, had been
mindul rom the ery beginning o his lie. As a Prince, he was
proided with eerything or a luxurious lie, but since he was
mindul, he did not indulge in such useless things.
1 Ramachandra Pandeya, Buddhist Studies in India P.61. -195
2 S.N. Rohitassa Sutta
8 At t achment and Det achment
In his lie, he neer conined himsel to the palace. It is true
that he had not gone outside the walls or come down rom his
palace during the our months o the rains. loweer, one can
think that he must hae gone out in other months o the year.
According to the Deticatet, ^vrtvrea Di.covr.e o the .vgvttara
^i/!,a, the Buddha said, Monks, I was delicately nurtured,
exceedingly-delicately nurtured, delicately nurtured beyond
measure... I had three palaces, one or winter, one or summer,
and one or the rainy season. In the our months o the rains, I
was waited on by minstrels, women all o them. I did not come
down rom my palace in those months`.
1
le did meet with his
riends Channa, Deadatta, Bhagu, Kimbila, and Kalud"yi. le
also isited many people belonging to many classes and creeds in
society. \e should consider that a country like India, een in
those days, might not hae been prosperous enough or all to
lie happily and peaceully. 1he society was complex with many
isms` such as Brahmanism, Shramanism, Jainism, Ajiikism,
Nihilism, Lternalism, Monism, and Pluralism so that people
were bewildered. 1he Prince was born and bred in this society,
mindully.
Just beore the emergence o Buddhism in India,
Brahmanism had preailed and inluenced the lies and thoughts
o the people in Central India. It is more meaningul to say, that
the period was rabvavoavi.baaic period, because in pre-
Buddhist society Brahmanic and Upanishadic inluence were at
their zenith.
It could be seen clearly, that according to Brahmanistic iews,
the structure o society was diinely ordered. In Rigeda, it is
said that a ourold society was created by the cosmic person or
the Brahman.
2
\e are able to ind out much about the
1 A.N. i.iii.4.38 Sutta
2 Rigeda X.ix.12
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 9
contemporary society rom Buddhist literature as well as other
contemporary religious literature. Prince Siddh"rtha wished to
see things as they really were since his childhood. le recognized
the etters o lay lie, howeer was not at once disgusted,
disenchanted. 1he people he associated with were not just rom
blue-blooded amilies, he must hae associated with poor people
also. In the 6th Century B. C., in Indian society, most people
were truth seekers. 1hey went rom place to place undergoing
many hardships. In the Canonical 1eaching, we come across
many such wanderers like, Vacchagotta, Dighanakha, M"gandiya,
Sandaka, Sakulud"yin, Uggham"na, and Vekhanassa. 1hey were
not just wanderers but seekers, searching or relie, truth.
1hey spent days and nights asting conscientiously, and in the
thick jungle een daringly. Sometimes, they conronted many
diiculties acing urious animals and snakes, howeer, deoted
their lies unsweringly or the achieement o emancipation. In
the orest, some o them practiced seere austerities such, as
boine ,goatika, asceticism and canine ,kukkuraatika,
asceticism.
1
1hese were not new practices in the history o India,
but rom the ery beginning o the indiidual's lie. Although
they practiced these austerities since the beginning o their lies,
they did not succeed in obtaining proitable results.
Many ollowed those teachers blindly and delusiely,
howeer, the teachers themseles were in the darkness o
ignorance. 1hey neer reached emancipation. Prince Siddhartha
examined the real disease in current society penetratiely and
started to seek a panacea. Since he was always in the habit o
practicing mindulness and constant awareness, he was able to
assess the nature o people as well as learn the arious concerns
o the day. As an extraordinary prince, he was eer alert. Once
the Buddha said, Beore my enlightenment, O monks, when
1 M.N. 5 Sutta
80 At t achment and Det achment
still a Bodhisatta, this thought occurred to me: \hat is
enjoyment in the world, what is misery in the world, and what is
the escape rom the world`.
1
In this manner, he himsel questioned, and being mindul and
wise, understood the real nature o the world. 1he abandoning
o desire and passion or the world is the avacea, the escape
rom the world.
iii). Prince and his Lducational Background
In our early Buddhist Scriptures, we do not ind a complete
explanation o his early educational period. loweer, according
to the customs o the time, especially or a Prince, he would
hae been gien the highest leel o teaching o the Veda, logic,
idioms, linguistics, dialectics, philosophy, and history.
2
At the
same time, the knowledge o etymology, phonology and the arts
o swordsmanship, archery, and horseback riding, etc. 1he
Buddhist scriptures are ull o illustrations used by the Buddha
rom such dierse ields as metalwork, carpentry, horse taming,
arming and trades in which the Buddha appears to hae had ar-
lung experiences in the lie o his society. le was also ery
skilul in the use o language with reerence to context. One may
say that the Buddha had such a ast knowledge because o his
Lnlightenment, this is true. le gained deep knowledge through
his wisdom ater the Lnlightenment. Nevertheless, even
before the Lnlightenment he was well versed, Master in
many areas of knowledge.
\e can ind in his teaching that most o his illustrations and
examples were taken rom contemporary society. \hen he talks
to a armer, he appears to know arming better than the armer
1 A. N. I. 35 Sutta. See \heel Publication NO. 155,158 page. 56
2 M.N.100 Sutta, Su. N.1020, D.N. iii sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 81
does.
1
low could he hae secured that knowledge, was it ater
the Lnlightenment I do not think so. In my iew, as he was
mindul, he was aware o what was going on within the society
deeply and penetratiely. le had a ery good knowledge o
society and the nature o the world rom his ery early days.
iv). Iour Signs and Renunciation
1he our signs ,Catt"ri Pubbanimitt"ni, in accordance with
the Mab!aa!va vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a are:
1. An aged man ,jinno,,
2. A sick man ,by"dito,,
3. A corpse ,k"lakato,, and
4. A recluse ,pabbajito,, respectiely.
2
One should remember that these our eents as narrated,
took place during the time o the Bodhisatta Vipassi who was
born ninety-one eons ago, but does not speciically reer to
Prince Siddhartha. 1he story narrated in the Sutta has been
generalized to apply to all the Buddhas. loweer, it may sound
unconincing. As said preiously, the Buddha himsel once
stated how he renounced his secular lie while his unwilling
parents wept and wailed.
3
At this point, I consider it necessary to unrael the
philosophical and psychological aspects o the our signs
,catt"ripubbanimitt"ni, that led the Prince to the great
renunciation. lor this purpose, one must be alert and critical, on
the other hand, one must be tolerant. 1hough the
1 S.N. 1.4.Sutta ,Kasibharadaja ,
2 D.N.14 Sutta
3 M.N. 26 Sutta P.20
82 At t achment and Det achment
Commentators ,especially, J"taka Commentator, iidly and
iguratiely explain the early days o the Buddha`s lie, we should
be careul to cast away the dust and grasp only the original idea.
In keeping with the Commentary, the our signs were
creations o the gods, created to be seen only by the prince and
his charioteer Channa. Ater haing seen all the our signs, in
accordance with the account, he decided to renounce the lay lie.
loweer, since we do not hae satisactory eidence in the
Canon, we do not wish to accept it only on the explanation
ound in later literature.
1he point I wish to submit or consideration is, that the so-
called our signs` were not creations o the gods but creations o
the imagination o Prince Siddh"rtha himsel. 1hese four signs,
as I see it, stand for impermanence, unsatisfactoriness,
soullessness, and Nibb!na.
As I pointed out earlier, the Prince was keen and mindul
about understanding things as they are`. In the world,
eerything is in the process o being conditioned, nothing is
static but kinetic. Since eerything is changing, things`, or
names o things` are true only or grammar. I one is mindul,
one can understand the impermanence o these concepts. 1his
Prince Siddh"rtha deeloped his mind by scrutinizing many
objects in nature such as, the blooming o lowers and their
ading away. le saw the uninterrupted continuity o the lie
cycle in growing plants and blooming lowers. le might hae
spent hours and hours inspecting lora and auna in nature.
1hese our imaginings led him to fore.ee rbat rovta be reatiea iv
tbe fvtvre. O the our signs, three characteristics o existence
were to be seen through the irst three signs and Liberation
,Nibb"na,, through the last one. An aged man was the irst sign
,imagining, to be relected in the Prince's mind. So, what is
ageing According to the accaribbavga vtta o the Ma;;biva
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 83
^i/!,a,
1
it is the decay o beings in the arious maniested orms
o being, their decrepitude, broken teeth, graying hair, wrinkling
skin, the dwindling o the lie-span, the collapse o the sense-
organs. ,katam"causo jar" y" tesam tesam satt"nam tamhi tamhi
sattanikaye jar"jiranat" khandiccam ph"liccam alittacat" "yuno
samh"ni indriy"nam parip"ko,.
1hus, it explains the nature o eer-changing organs and
other elements o the body, molecules een. 1hese are the main
characteristics o component things ,sankh"ra, in the world. In
the .vicca vtta o the av,vtta ^i/!,a,
2
the Buddha expounded,
Body, monks, is impermanent, eeling, perception, the
actiities, consciousness are impermanent`. 1he well-taught
mindul person, seeing the impermanence o all the ie
aggregates o existence, is dissatisied by the body, eeling,
perception, actiities, and consciousness. Being dissatisied he
neer lusts or anything in the inner or outer world.
\hen the isualization o an aged-man occurred in the
Prince`s mind, at once he saw the nature o lie, as it is to be
born in this world. le could perceie it comprehensiely
because o his critical eye and well-trained mindulness.
loweer, as seen in our literary works, the signiicance o the
aculties o critical apprehension and mindulness` is not
relected. In accordance with some accounts of the Life of
the Buddha, in this instance, Prince Siddh!rtha had
behaved in a childlike innocent way, but his age then was
twenty-nine. 1hereore, it is an unacceptable assumption that
he had not known or seen an aged man beore. I he were not
permitted to go out rom the palace by his ather Suddhodana
who was determined to enthrone his son as the monarch, how
could he hae not seen his ather, stepmother, wie, and the
1 M.N. 141 Sutta P 295
2 S.N. iii P.20
84 At t achment and Det achment
elderly courtiers themseles growing old in the palace I think it
is ery correct to assume that the Prince was, by that time,
earnestly practicing his mindulness and awareness. 1hat would
hae been the main dierence between the prince and the rest o
the society at that time. 1hus, the irst isualization o his mind
embodied the characteristics o impermanence.
lis second isualization was o a sick man. lrom the
Buddhist point o iew, birth, decay, sickness, and death are
suering. ,j"tipi dukkh" jar"pidukkh" y"dhipidukkho
maranampidukkham,.
1
1hose are the our signs symbolized by
the our animals in the moonstone in Sri Lanka.
2
Prince
Siddh"rtha, ater seeing a sick man while on his way to a park in
order to get closer to nature, was thinking about the arious
types o sicknesses. le must hae realized that as worldly
people, King Suddhodana and his amily may also hae been
alicted with diseases. loweer, on this particular day, while he
was relecting about this incident mindully, he understood the
nature o suering. Perhaps he might hae seen people suering
in society because as I mentioned earlier, he was not bred in the
remote orest but in an urban enironment.
laing seen the sick man on that day, he understood that
suering was the nature o all impermanent things in the world.
lurther, he understood that whatsoeer shares the essence o
impermanence, is suering. One may question how the prince
understood these things een prior to his Lnlightenment. It is
1 S.N. V. P.420, Mahaagga .I.10. 1
2 1he moonstone is a semi circle slab o hard granite that which is the irst o steps leading to a shrine-
room or a temple. At the edge o this stone is a base o cared lames, which is indicatie o suering, a
ine ollowing the cared edge o this stone inside the lames, depicts craing. Next, come our animals:
elephant, bull, horse, and lion, which are symbolic o birth, disease, decay, and death. Aboe the animals is
placed a line o swans, which are representatie o purity. linally, you will see a lotus which is heaen or
Liberation, Nibb"na.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 85
true, that one may not understand such phenomena deeply or
entirely beore the attainment o one's Lnlightenment.
Neertheless, with our experience o meditating throughout
many years in the country, as well as abroad, we can say that we
are able to observe these three characteristics to a limited
extent through meditation.
\e all can accept that the prince was not just an aerage
prince but also a genius o ininite proportion, who had done
many meritorious deeds in his preious births ,J"taka stories
depict his preious births,. 1hereore, he would hae had an
unparalleled and unquestionable personality with the power to
understand those characteristics o existence better than a
normal person would, such as you or me.
Along the way, he relected upon the irst two signs and
concluded that whateer is liable to change and suering, that
cannot be grasped as one`s sel or soul. lurther, down the way,
he saw a corpse being brought to a cemetery. Since seeing these
three signs, the aged man, the sick man, and the corpse, prince
Siddhartha must hae relected upon these three signs repeatedly
both critically and mindully, as a result, right understanding
arose in him ,samm"ditthi,. lurther, he re-thought, How
sensual desire provides little gratification but much
suffering and despair, and how great is the danger in
them.
1
1he Buddha said, 1o me, monks, thus blest with much
prosperity and nurtured with exceeding delicacy, this thought
occurred, surely, one o the uneducated men-olk, though
himsel subject to old age, and decay, not haing passed beyond
old age and decay, when he sees another broken down with age
is troubled, ashamed, disgusted, being orgetul that he himsel,
is such a one`.
1 M.N. 14 Sutta
86 At t achment and Det achment
Now, I too am subject to old age and decay, not haing
passed beyond old age and decay. 1hough I were to see another
broken down with old age, I might be troubled, ashamed, and
disgusted. 1his would not be seemly in me. 1hus, monks, as I
considered the matter, all pride in my youth deserted me.
1
Again,
monks, I thought...subject to disease... now, I too am subject to
disease... thus, monks, as I considered the matter, and all pride in
my health deserted me. Again monks, I thought, subject to
death, now I too am subject to death... thus, monks, as I
considered the matter all pride in my lie deserted me.` Against
this background, he thought deeply and he was led to the ourth
sign, i.e. a recluse.
Prince Siddh"rtha, through his critical knowledge, discerned
that pleasures o the senses are o little satisaction and much
pain. le relected on the lie o a householder and that o a
recluse, who had gone orth rom home to homelessness. 1hen
it occurred to his mind that the lie o a recluse is more liberated,
unlimited, like space, and the lie and pleasures o the secular
world are coered with dust. 1hereupon, he perceied the
coolness in the lie o a recluse as the ourth sign.
1hese thoughts sank deeply into his consciousness and on
that day itsel, he decided to relinquish all the animate and
inanimate things that belonged to him. 1hen, with ery clear
understanding, he renounced the \orldly Lie` seeking ater
good ,kimkusala gaesi,. In the Mab! Parivibb!va vtta o the
Digba ^i/!,a,
2
the Buddha says: 1wenty-nine was I, when I
renounced the world, Subhadda, seeking ater good! Now oer
ity years and more hae passed, since the day I went orth, to
roam the realm o wisdom's law outside o which no ascetic can
be, |lirst, second, third or orth degree|. Other schools of such
1 A.N. I. P.129
2 D.N. 16 Sutta .P.16
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 8
are bare, but here, if monks live perfectly, the world won't
lack for Arahants.`
Lkunatimso ayas" Subhadda
\am Pabbajim kim kusalanuesi
Vass"ni pann"sa sam"dhik"ni
\ato aham pabbajito Subhadda...
lrom this statement o the Buddha, made a ew days beore
his Great Parinibb"na, we can clearly conclude that his
renunciation came to pass at the age o 29 and that he passed
into Parinibb"na at the age o eighty. 1hus, haing understood
the signiicance o being as solitary as a horned rhinoceros,
1
he
renounced the world.
v). 1he Prince among the 1eachers
Being well established in mindulness, the Prince understood
the danger in sensual pleasures and saety in going orth.
2
1hereater, he went orth as a recluse. According to the Pabba;;!
vtta o the vttavi!ta, haing gone orth, he isited R"jagaha
or alms. \hile the recluse was going around or his ood,
Bimbis"ra, the king o Magadha, saw him and sent some
messengers to ind out where he was going. laing concluded
his alms-round, the recluse, Siddh"rtha, reached mount
P"ndawa. Ater seeing him, the messengers went back to the
King and inormed him o what the recluse was doing.
1 Su.N. 1. 3- Khaggais"na Sutta-, leaing behind son and wie, and ather and mother, and wealth and gain
and relaties and sensual pleasures to the ull extent, one should wander as solitary as a Rhynoceros` horn,
2 Su.N. Pabbajja Sutta
88 At t achment and Det achment
1hey said, 1hat bhikkhu, Great king, is seated on the eastern
side o P"ndawa, like a tiger or bull, like a lion in a mountain
cae.`
1
,Lsa bhikkhu mah"r"ja p"ndawassa purakkhato nisinno
yaghrasabho a sihowa girigabbhare,. learing the report o the
messengers, the King went to Mount P"ndawa to see him in the
state ehicle.
Upon reaching the recluse, the king sat down and exchanged
the customary riendly greetings. 1hen spoke these words, \ou
are young and tender in your irst youth, a stripling endowed
with good complexion and stature, like a Khattiya o good birth.
I shall gie you all things o enjoyment, een my ery
kingdom...enjoy them, but tell me o your birth ,j"tim akkh"hi,
rom what clan are you`
1he Recluse reealed his birth and amily background to the
king saying, that he was Sakya by birth and Adicca by clan. le
also told the King that he did not desire any sensual pleasures.
,Adicca n"ma gottena S"kiy" n"ma j"tiy", tamh" kul"
pabbajitomhi r"ja na k"me abhi patthayam,.
2
1he Recluse urther
explained that he was striing orth to achiee happiness o
mind.
As a Recluse, he wandered in the jungle mindully and stroe
to see things in reality, priority was gien to intra-perception. le
was well aware o his enironment, being keen and igilant, this
eer-alert Recluse practiced many methods o meditation. le
went rom place to place seeking what is good ,kimkusala, and
what is truth ,kimsacca,.
On one occasion, according to the .ri,aari,e.ava vtta o the
Ma;;biva ^i/!,a,
3
in recollecting his early lie beore awakening,
1 Ibid 416
2 Su. N. 423
3 M.N.26 Sutta
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 89
the Buddha said that haing gone orth in quest o whateer is
good, searching or the incomparable, the matchless path to
peace, he approached Al"ra K"lama, and accepted and ollowed
his instructions, and mastered it ery quickly. ,so kho aham
bhikkhae nacirassea khippamea tam dhammam sayam
abhinn" sacchikat" upasampajja ih"sim,.
In this connection, we must recognize the quickness o his
grasp o any aailable knowledge. 1he Sutta says that he
mastered the teachings o Al"ra K"l"ma as quickly as he heard
him. ,ottha pahata mattena lapita l"pana mattena,. \hat is
behind such quick learning 1o my mind, it is nothing but his
well-established mindulness. le also possessed a critical mind,
through which he realized that this teaching o K"l"ma, is
certainly inappropriate or the realization o truth. le thought:
1his dhamma does not lead to disenchantment, to dispassion,
to cessation, to peace, to direct knowledge, to enlightenment, to
nibb"na ,n"yam dhammo nibbid"ya na ir"g"ya na nirod"ya na
upasam"ya na abhinn"ya na sambodh"ya na nibb"n"ya
samattati,.` 1hereupon the recluse Gotama contemplated that
it was not only Al"ra K"l"ma who had aith, energy, and
mindulness, but he himsel, had mindulness ,mayhampi atthi
sati,, thus, he endeaored to realize the dhamma in a dierent
\ay.
At this moment, Al"ra K"l"ma said, 1he dhamma that I
know, is the dhamma that you know, and the dhamma that you
know, is the dhamma that I know. As I am, so are you, as you
are, so am I. Come now \our reerence, just the two o us, let
us go and look ater this group.` loweer, the recluse Gotama
not being satisied with the dhamma taught by K"l"ma went
away rom him.
lor the second time, the recluse, Gotama, went in search o
another teacher, one who was most amous at the time. 1his was
Uddaka R"ma`s son ,Uddakar"ma putta,. Ater approaching him,
the Recluse had the opportunity o leading the holy lie
according to his dhamma. Under the guidance o
90 At t achment and Det achment
Uddakar"maputta, he practiced and realized the dhamma he
taught. le eentually, inormed Uddaka that he had reached the
state o neither perception-nor-nonperception. ,nea sann" n"
sann",. 1his, howeer, was not the goal expected by the recluse
Gotama and soon ater this realization, he let the place
searching ater truth.
lenceorth, the recluse Gotama had to under go many
hardships. le spent his whole lie in quest o the truth,
sometimes, without een taking enough ood and water. During
this period o austerity, though he was physically weak and ailing,
he practiced constant awareness and understood how dierent
natural things happened in the orest. According to the
ba,abberara vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a,
1
the Buddha, later on,
declared, that there were some recluses who preerred to say that
night was similar to day, and day to night. loweer, the iew o
the Buddha was that they were liing in bewilderment. 1he
Buddha stated, I declare day as day and night as night.
1his is a ery important act to be gleaned rom the teaching o
the Buddha. 1hroughout his lie, the Buddha endeaored to see
things as they were, and encouraged others to see things as they
really are. 1his is what is meant in the oregoing ew lines about
seeing day-as-day and night-as-night. 1hose who know the
essential as essential and unessential as unessential are
dwelling in right thoughts and do arrive at the Lssential.
2
1herefore, mindfulness is the basic principle of
Buddhism. No Buddhism can prevail in the hearts of
people who do not practice mindfulness. Mindfulness is to
be practiced and cultivated at every moment in one's life.
1 M.N. 4 Sutta
2 Dh.12 Vr
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 91
Since the recluse Gotama was alert in the orest, according to
the ba,abberara vtta, o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, he heard strange
noises, which would hae terriied normal people. Not
terrified am I, I am one of those Ariyans who do not get
terrified, he said. 1hese strange noises did, indeed eoke
unskilled ear and dread. Surmounting ear and dread, the recluse
Gotama dwelt in the remote orest, extending loing kindness to
all liing beings.
1hus, turning away rom the teacher, Uddakar"maputta, he
made strong eort by himsel and meditated through both day
and night. le was endowed with good conduct and knowledge.
laing oercome craing to the ie aggregates o existence, he
consumed ery little ood and dedicated himsel to deep
concentration o mind.
In the Mab! acca/a vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a,
1
the
Buddha explained how he stroe or the realization o Nibb"na.
In our common belie, the Buddha attained enlightenment ater
the great struggle with M"ra under the Bodhi tree. 1here is a
long story about his lie beore the enlightenment, it is about
how he practiced meditation. 1he aboe Sutta o the Ma;;biva
^i/!,a narrates this story iidly. A very few people are aware
of this story because most do not have access to the
original Suttas or the Scriptures. 1hereore, I think it is not
inappropriate to stress this interesting and quite impressie
struggle o the Buddha.
It reads as ollows in the Sutta:
It occurred to me, Aggiesana, suppose that I now with
my teeth clenched and tongue pressed against the roo o
the mouth, by mind along should subdue, restrain, and
dominate the mind. So I, Aggiesana, with my teeth
1 M.N. 36 Sutta
92 At t achment and Det achment
clenched, with my tongue pressed against the palate, by
mind subdued, restrained and dominated the mind. \hile
I was subduing restraining and dominating my mind, with
teeth clenched, the tongue pressed against the palate,
sweat poured rom my armpits. It is as i Aggiesana, a
strong man haing taken hold o a weaker man by his
head or shoulders, would subdue, restrain, and dominate
him. Len so, while I, Aggiesana, was subduing,
restraining, and dominating my mind, with my teeth
clenched, and with my tongue pressed against the palate
sweat poured rom my armpits. Although, Aggiesana,
unsluggish energy came to be stirred up in me, unmuddled
mindulness set up, yet my body was turbulent, not
calmed, because I was harassed in striing, by striing
against that ery pain, yet Aggiesana, that painul eeling
arising in me persisted without impinging on my mind. It
occurred to me, Aggiesana: I suppose now, that I should
meditate the non-breathing` meditation.
1hereore, Aggiesana I stopped breathing in and
breathing out through the mouth and through the nose.
\hen I, Aggiesana, had stopped breathing in and
breathing out through the mouth and through the nose,
there came to be an exceedingly loud noise o winds
escaping by the auditory passages, as there comes to be an
exceedingly loud noise rom the roaring o the smith's
bellows. So when I, Aggiesana, stopped breathing in and
breathing out through the mouth and through the noise,
there came to be an exceedingly loud noise o wind
escaping by the auditory passages. Although, Aggiesana,
unsluggish energy came to be stirred up in me, unmuddled
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 93
mindulness
In some Suttas, we can ind the ollowing passage at the end
o the Sutta Khin" j"ti, usitam brahmacariyam, katam
karaniyam, n"param itthatth"y"ti abbann"si. Annataro ca kho
pan"yasm"... arahatam ahosi`, which means: Destroyed is
rebecoming, brought to a close is the Brahma aring, done is
what was to be done, there is nothing urther to be done. So
theVenerable.|so and so| became one o the Perected Ones`.
1
1hat passage describes how one becomes an Arahant ater
achieing Detachment`.In the Mab! ...avra vtta o the
Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, there is another description o how one
becomes and Arahant. It says, Lil unskilled states that are
connected with the deilements, with again becoming, earul
whose results are anguish, leading to birth, ageing, and dying in
the uture are ar rom him. It is thus monks that a monk is a
perected one.` ,Katham ca bhikkhae bhikkhu araham hoti,
"rak"ssa honti p"pak" akusal"dhamma sankilesik" ponobhaik"
D.N. XXIX Sutta P. 125. ,P1S, Araham khin"sa" katakaraniyo ohitabharo anuppatta sadattho
parikkhina bhaa samyojano samma dann" imutto abhabbo so naa th"n"ni ajjh"caritum`
1 M.N. 1 . Sutta P.51
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 241
sadar" dukkhaip"k" "yatim j"ti jar"maraniy". Lam kho
bhikkhae bhikkhu araham hoti,.
1
1here is a close relation between wisdom and
philosophy. 1o be an Lnlightened One, one has to cultiate
one`s wisdom. \hen one has cultiated one`s wisdom, one
becomes a philosopher. In an Arahant, there is no resentment,
no distress, and no dissatisaction o mind, no joy, no gladness,
and no elation o mind.
2
1hey do not cling to body, do not cling
to eeling, do not cling to perception, do not cling to olitional
ormation, and do not cling to consciousness. 1hey are released
rom all these
3
and are liberated without grasping.
In the .rabavt vtta o Kba;;avi,a 1agga in av,vtta ^i/!,a,
4
there are many instances or how they became Detached Ones.
1hey hae become detached by penetrating the ie aggregates
o existence. \ith regard to body, eeling, perception, olitional
ormation, and consciousness, they eel disenchantment. leeling
disenchanted, are non-attached, by non-attachment, they are
released, and by that release, they are set ree. 1hen, knowledge
arises in them that they are reed and they can come to know,
destroyed is rebirth, lied is the righteous lie, and done is the
task, or lie in these conditions there is no hereater ,Nibbindam
irajjati ir"ga imuccati imuttasmin imutta miti n"nam hoti.
Khin"j"ti usitam brahmacariyam katam karaniyam n"param
itthatt"y"ti paj"n"ti,.
5
1 M.N. I.39Sutta P. 280
2 M.N. I.22 Sutta P.180
3 S.N. III.63 Sutta P. 64
4 S.N.III.P. 63
5 Ibid .P.84
242 At t achment and Det achment
1he Buddha said that Arahantship is the highest stage, that
which is een beyond the nine ,9, abodes, and is the best in the
entire world system ,\aat" bhikkhae satt""sa yaat"
bhaaggam ete agg" ete setth" lokasmin yadidam arahanto,.
1
In
the av,vtta ^i/!,a, the Buddha explains Arahantship in the
ollowing erses:
1. Sukhino ata arahanto tanh" tesam na ijjati
Asmim"no samucchinno mohaj"lam pad"litam
2. Anejanto anuppatt" cittam tesam an"ilam
Loke anupalitt" te brahmabhut" an"sa"
3. Pancakkhandhe parinn"ya satt" saddhamma gocar"
pasamsiya sappuris" putt" buddhassa oras"
4. Sattaratana sampann" tisu sikkh"su sikkhit"
Anuicaranti mah"ir" pahinabhaya bhera"
5. Dasahangehi sampann" mah"n"ga samahit"
ete kho setth" lokasmim tanh" tesam naijjati
6. Asekhananam uppannam antimo yam samussayo
yo saro brahmacariyassa tasmin aparapaccay"
. Vidhasu na ikampanti ippamuttapunabbha"
dantabhumim anuppatt" te loke ijit"ino
8. Uddham tiriyam apacinam nandi tesam na Vijjati
Nadanti te sihan"dam Buddh" loke anuttar"
,S.N.III 6 PP 83-84,
According to this description gien by the Buddha, they are
happy indeed. In them, there is no craing, they hae rooted out
the I concept` and burst out o the net o delusion`. 1hey
hae attained the bliss o Nibb"na. 1heir consciousness is
1 Ibid
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 243
translucent. 1hey are completely ree rom cankers. Being
detached, they lie as the highest holy beings in the world. 1hey
are praise-worthy and gentle-hearted, they are the sons o the
Buddha who ollow the seen dhammas ,aith, shame, ear,
truth, energy, mindulness, and wisdom,.
1
1hey hae ully
realized ie groups o existence as well as the ie grasping
groups o existence ,Pancakkhandh" and panca
up"d"nakkhandh",.
Deeloping the seen actors o Lnlightenment and the
threeold diision` o the Lightold Path ,sila sam"dhi pann",,
they lie peaceully in society eradicating ear and dread.
Arahants are called so, because they are endowed with ten
attributes ,dasa angehi samann"gato arah"ti uccati,. 1hese ten
are the tenold powers o a perect one. In the Mab! ibav!aa
vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, it is stated by the Buddha,
S"riputta, a 1ath"gata has these ten powers o a 1ath"gata`,
endowed with these powers, a 1ath"gata claims the leader`s
place, roars his lion`s roar in assemblies, and sets rolling the
Brahma-wheel`. ,Dasa kho panaim"ni S"riputta 1ath"gatassa
1ath"gatabal"ni yehi balehi samann"gato 1ath"gato "sabhan
th"nam patij"n"ti, paris"su sihan"dam nadati brahmacakkam
paatteti,.
2
1hese irtues o the Lnlightened Ones are the highest in the
world. 1hey hae won the knowledge, which goes beyond
training ,Asekhan"na,. 1hey hae reached their last birth. 1hey
hae made the ultimate use o their lies. 1hey are unshaken by
all kinds o conceit and set ree rom rebecoming. 1hey hae
come to the tamed stage` ,dantabhumi,, and they are the
Victorious Ones` in the world. Considering them in all
1 S.N. III. P.69 ,see. oot note,
2 M.N. I. 12 Sutta .See also Dasa 1hath"gata bala - Buddhist Dictionary by Ny"natiloka
244 At t achment and Det achment
directions, there is no lure in them. 1hey make the lion`s roar.
1hey are the Detached Ones` ,Anup"d" Vimutta,.
Larly Buddhist teaching and the
1ath!gata concept
Irom the point o iew o the early Buddhist 1eaching, I
intend doing an analytical surey o the aboe topic. 1his is
obiously a deep and proound subject to deal with. In our early
discourses ,ovr ^i/!,a.,, the term 1ath"gata`, is ound
requently. As we mentioned in the ery out set o this chapter,
this term has been used by the Buddha to denote himsel on
many occasions. In the discourse o the Banner Protection
,Dba;agga,,
1
the Buddha introducing himsel to monks said, O
monks, the 1ath"gata who is Arahant, Supremely Lnlightened, is
ree rom lust, ree rom hate, is ree rom delusion, and is not
liable to ear, terror, right or light`.,1ath"gato bhikkhae
araham Samm" Sambuddho itar"go itadoso itamoho abhiru
acchambhi anutr"si apal"yiti,.
1here are numerous instances in the Suttas where the term
has been employed to designate the Buddha, the supreme
Lnlightened One. \e can irmly state that in all places where it
has been employed, it reers to the Buddha, the Supreme
Lnlightened one. 1o understand the dierent contexts and
meanings o the term, I intend to do this surey ocusing,
mainly, on the ovr ^i/!,a., because without any controersy,
each and eery scholar will accept those lour Nik"yas` as the
teaching o the Buddha.
\hen we come to the Digba ^i/!,a, within the ery irst
Sutta, the word 1ath"gata` appears more than a hundred times
,103,. 1he term has been used mostly with the epithet o
1 S.N. I. xi. I. 3. P 281
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 245
Samano Gotamo`.
1
In the short paragraphs about conduct
,Cvta.ita,, the longer paragraphs about conduct ,Ma;;biva .ita,,
and the longest paragraphs about conduct ,Mab! ita,, this same
epithet can be seen reerring to the Buddha. Len aterwards,
the term has been used as a synonym or the Buddha, the Sel
Awakened One.
2
As a Sel- Realized One, the 1ath"gata knows
things as they are. le has understood the arising and passing
away o things, their taste, and danger, without grasping ater
anything, le is quite set ree.
3
1owards the end o the sutta, it is mentioned that the
outward orm o the 1ath"gata, who has won the 1ruth, stands
beore us, gods and men alike to behold, but has cut re-
becoming and upon the dissolution o the body, neither gods
nor men shall see him.
4
\hen we come to the !vavvabata vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a,
the term 1ath"gata` has been mentioned seeral times in that
sutta too. In this sutta, the term appears, to be as a reerence to
the Buddha himsel. According to the Sutta, addressing to the
King Aj"tasattu, the Buddha said, O King, there appears in the
world One who has won the truth ,1ath"gata,, an Arahant, a
lully Awakened One, abounding in wisdom and goodness.
lappy, who knows all worlds, unsurpassed as a Guide to
mortals willing to be led a teacher or gods and men, the Blessed
one, the Buddha. le, by himsel, thoroughly knows and sees
1 Larup"ya tiracch"na ijj"ya micch"ji"patiirato Samano Gotamo ti P.10.
2 Ime kho te bhikkhae dhamm" gambhir" duddas" duranubodh" sant" panit" atakkh"acar" nipun"
pandita edaniy" ye 1ath"gato sayam abhinn" saccikat" paedeti P. 1
3 Samudayam ca atthagamam ca ass"dam ca "dinaam ca nissaranam ca yath" bhutam idit" anup"da
imutto bhikkhae 1ath"gato P. 28
4 Ucchinna bhaa nettiko tath"gatassa kayo titthati yaassa kayo thassati taa nam dakkhinti dea manussa
P. 46
246 At t achment and Det achment
ace to ace this unierse as it is, including the worlds aboe, o
the gods, the Brahm"s, the M"ras, and the world below with its
recluses and Brahmins, its princes and peoples and haing
known it, he makes his knowledge known to others`.
1
In this context, all epithets are gien to the Buddha together
with the term 1ath"gata`. In the same Sutta, there is another
occasion where the term has been employed by Sanjaya Belattha.
le says, loti 1ath"gato param maran" na hoti 1ath"gato
param maran" hoti ca na hoti ca 1ath"gato parammaran",
neahoti na na hoti ca tath"gato parammaran" Iti ce mam
pucchasi. Lam pi me no 1ath" ti pi me no. Annath" ti pi meno.
No tipi me no. No no tipi me no.` It means, i he were asked the
our questions`: \hether the One who has won the truth
,1ath"gata,, will continue ater death \ill not continue ater
death Neither continues ater death Neither continues nor, not
continues ater death I he were to think that the 1ath"gata
exists ater death he replies yes`. I he were to think that the
1ath"gata does not exist, he replies no`, and i he were to think
that the 1ath"gata neither exists nor not exists he replies the
same. lis answers are not clear to an aerage person but there is
a deep meaning in his philosophy. le practiced skeptical doubt
towards eerything in the world.
1his ourold method o questioning is to be ound mainly in
Asian philosophy. In the time o the Buddha, many people used
them or arguing matters pertaining to metaphysical questions.
\e come across this our-old question in some Suttas in the
Buddhist Canon too.
1 Idha Mah" R"ja 1ath"gato loke uppajjati araham samm" sambuddho ijj" carana sampanno sugato
lokaidu anuttaro purisa damma s"rathi satth" dea manuss"nam buddho bhaga". So imam lokam
sadeakam sam"rakam sabrahmakam sassamana br"hmanim pajam sadea manussam sayam abhinn"
sacchikat" paedeti P. 62.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 24
lrom this account, we can conclude that the term,
1ath"gata` is peculiar to Buddhism and constantly occurs in the
ovr ^i/!,a..
\hen we urther examine the Digba ^i/!,a, this term can be
ound in many suttas. \e would now like to draw your attention
to the term 1ath"gata` in the discourses o the irst ovr
^i/!,a..
DIGHA NIK#YA
1. Ambattha Sutta: 1ath!gatena y"a tatiyakam saha
dhammikam panham puttho na y"karoti ettheassa sattadh"
muddham phalissati` - D.N. III Sutta P.95
2. J"liya Sutta: 1ath!gato Loke uppajjati araham samm"
sambuddho` - D.N.VII Sutta. P. 159
3. Potthap"da Sutta: loti 1ath!gato param maran" na hoti
1ath"gato..`D.N.IX Sutta P. 188
4. Lohicca Sutta: 1ath!gatappaveditam Dhamma isesam
adhigacchanti` - D.N. XII Sutta P229
5. 1eijja Sutta: 1ath!gatassa Brahma loke a.. 1ath"gato
loke uppajjati`: - D.N. XIII Sutta P 249
6. Mah"Pad"na Sutta:- 1ath!gatassa Mahiddhikat"
mah"nubh"at"` - D.N. XIV Sutta P.8
. Mah" Nid"na Sutta: loti 1ath!gato param maran" no
hoti.`: - D.N. XV Sutta P.68
8. Mah" Parinibb"na Sutta: Natthi Ananda 1ath!gatassa
dhammesu "cariya mutthi` ,in this Sutta the term is
appearing or 143 times, - D.N. XVI P.100
9. Mah" Sudassana Sutta: 1ath!gate abhippasann" te
1ath"gatassa sarira pujam karissati` - D.N. XVII Sutta P.169
10. Jana Vasabha Sutta: 1ath!gatam namassantam
Dhammassa ca Sudhammatam` - D.N. XVIII Sutta. P. 211
248 At t achment and Det achment
11. Mah" Samaya Sutta: 1ath!gatam dassan"ya bhikkhu
sangahan ca` - D.N. XX Sutta P.255
12. P"tika Sutta: 1ath!gate arahante samm" sambuddho`
D.N. XXIV Sutta PP 25 - 26
13. Udumbarika Sih"n"da Sutta: 1ath!gatassa " 1ath"gata
s"akassa "` - D.N. XXV Sutta P.4
14. Agganna Sutta: 1ath!gatassa hetam adhiacanam
Dhamma k"yo itipi, Brahmak"yo itipi Dhamma bhuto itipi
Brahma bhuto itipi` - D.N. XXVII P.84
15. Sampas"da Sutta: 1ath!gatassa appicchat" santutthit"` -
D.N. XXVII Sutta P.115
16. Lakkhana Sutta: 1ath!gato purimam j"tim purimam
bhaam` -D.N. XXX Sutta P.145
1. Sangiti Sutta: Idh"uso 1ath!gato ca loke uppanno hoti
araham samm" sambuddho` - D.N. XXXIII Sutta. P.264
18. Dasuttara Sutta: Itime timsa dhamm" bhuta taccha tatha
aitatha anannatha samm" 1ath!gatena abhisambuddho` -
D.N. XXXIV Sutta. P.26
\hen we scrutinize the discourses o the Digba ^i/!,a,
P!.!ai/a vtta
1
is ery much signiicant or the elaboration o the
term 1ath"gata`. In this Sutta it is said why le is called
1ath"gata`. 1here are ie deinitions. 1hey are:
1. Concerning things Past, Present, and luture, the
1ath"gata is a prophet o the hour, a prophet o act, a
prophet o good, a prophet o the norm, a prophet o the
discipline and or this he is called, 1ath"gata. ,Atit"n"gata
paccuppannesu dhammesu 1ath"gato k"la "di,
1 D.N. xxix Sutta P.116
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 249
bhuta"di, attha"di, dhamma"di, inaya"di, tasm"
1ath"gato ti uccati,.
2. \hosoeer in this world together with its De"s, Mar"s,
and Brahm"s, by gods or men, recluses or brahmins, seen,
heard, elt discerned, accomplished, strien or, or
deised in mind, all is understood by the 1ath"gata. It is
or this, he is called 1ath"gata ,\o kho sadeakassa
lokassa sam"rakassa sabrahmakassa sassamanabr"hmaniy"
paj"ya sadea manuss"ya dittham sutam mutam inn"tam
pattam pariyesitam anuicaritam manasa sabbam
1ath"gatena abhisambuddham tasma 1ath"gato ti
uccati,.
3. In all that interal, between the nights wherein the
1ath"gata was enlightened in the Supreme
Lnlightenment, and the night wherein he passed away
without any condition o rebecoming remaining, all in this
interal, he speaks in discourses or conersations or
exposition, all this is so, and not otherwise. lor this he is
called, 1ath"gata ,\am ca rattim 1ath"gato anuttaram
samm" sambodhim abhisambujjh"ti, yanca rattim
anupadises"ya nibb"nadh"tuy" parinibb"yati yam etasmim
antare bh"sati, lapati, niddisati, sabbam tam tathea hoti,
na annath". 1asma 1ath"gatoti uccati,
4. As the 1ath!gata says, so he does, as he does, so he
says. In as much as he goes according to his word, his
word is according to his going, or this he is called,
1ath"gata ,\ath""di 1ath"gato tath" k"ri, yath"k"ri
tath"adi. Iti yath""di tath"k"ri, yath" k"ri tath" "di.
1asm" 1ath"gato ti uccati,
5. As to the world with its M"ras and its Brahmas, all its olk
diine or human, recluses or brahmins the 1ath"gata has
surpassed them, has not by them been surpassed and
sureys them with sure ision, the disposer o things. lor
this he is called, 1ath"gata. ,Sadeake loke sam"rake
sabrahmake sassamana br"hmaniya paj"ya sadea
250 At t achment and Det achment
manuss"ya 1ath"gato abhibhu anabhi bhuto annadatthu
daso asaatti. 1asm" 1ath"gato ti uccati,.
1
MAJJHIMA NIK#YA
1. Mulapariy"ya Sutta: 1ath!gato pi bhikkhae araham Samm"
Sambuddho pathaim pathaito abhij"n"ti..M.N. 1 - P.5-6
2. Cula Sihan"da Sutta: 1ath!gato ca kho bhikkhae araham
Samm" Sambuddho Sabbupad"na Parinn""do - M.N. 1I.
P.6
3. Mah" Sihan"da Sutta: Dasa kho panim"ni S"riputta
1ath!gatassa 1ath!gata bal!ni yehi balehi samann"gato
1ath"gato "sabh"th"nan patij"n"ti, paris"su sihan"dam nadati
.- M.N. 12 P.69
4. Madhaupindika Sutta: Cakkhubhuto n"nabhuto dhamma
bhuto brahma bhuto atta paatta atthassa inneta amatassa
d"t", dhammass!mi 1ath"gato - M.N. 18 P.111.
5. Alagaddupama Sutta: 1atra ca bhikkhae pare 1ath!gatam
akkosanti paribh"santi rosanti tatra bhikkhae 1ath"gatassa
na hoti agato na appaccayo na cetaso anabhiraddhi - M.N. 22
P. 140
6. Rathainitha Sutta: Br"hmano ti kho bhikkhu 1ath!gatassa
etam adhiacanam arahato Samm" Sambuddhassa - M.N. 24
P. 144
. Ariyapariyesana sutta: Na bhikkhae 1ath!gato bahuliko na
padhanaibbhanto naatto b"hull"ya. Araham bhikkhae
1ath"gato Samm" Sambuddho - M.N. 26 P.12
1 D.N. xxix. P.135
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 251
8. Culahatthipadopama Sutta: Idha pi uccati br"hmana
1ath!gata padam iti pi 1ath"gataniseitam iti pi 1ath"gata
ranjitam iti pi - M.N. 2 P.181-182
9. Mah" Gop"laka Sutta: Idha bhikkhae bhikkhu
1ath!gatappavedite dhamma inaya desiyam"ne na labhati
atthaedam na labhati dhammaedam na labhati
dhammupasamhitam p"mujjam - M.N. 33 P. 221
10. Cula Assapura Sutta: 1ath!gatappaveditam dhamma -
inayam "gamma eam mettam karunam muditam
upekkham bh"et" labhati ajjhattam upasamam. 40 P. 284
11. Vimansaka Sutta: Vimansakena bhikkhae bhikkhun"
parassa cetopariy"yam aj"nantena disu dhammesu
1ath!gato Samannesitabbo - M.N. 4. P. 318
12. Brahmanimantanika Sutta: 1ath!gatassa ye "sa"
sankilesik" ponobhaika sadara dukkhaip"k" "yatim j"tijar"
maraniy" te pahin".. M.N. 49 P 331
13. M"ratajjaniya Sutta: Nikkhama p"pim" m" 1ath!gatam
ihesesi m" 1ath"gata s"akam - M.N. 50 P. 332
14. Sekha Sutta: Idha Mah"n"ma ariya s"ako saddho hoti
saddhahati 1ath!gatassa bodhim - M.N. 55 P. 356
15. Jiaka Sutta: \o kho jiaka 1ath!gatam " 1ath"gata-
s"akam " uddissa p"nam "rabhati so pancahi thanehi
bahum apunnam pasaati - M.N. 56 P. 31
16. Cula M"lunkya sutta: loti 1ath!gato param maran" na hoti
1ath"gato param maran", hoti ca na hoti ca 1ath"gato param
maran" nea hoti na na hoti 1ath"gato param maran" - M.N.
63 P.428
1. Nalakap"na sutta: Na kho Anuruddha 1ath!gato janakuha-
nattham na janalapanattham na l"bhasakk"ra
silok"nisamsattham.. - M.N. 68 P. 465
18. Kit"giri Sutta: 1ath!gatappavedita cassa dhamma pann"ya
odittha honti ocarita - M.N. 0 P. 40
252 At t achment and Det achment
19. AggiacchagottaSutta: \enarupena1ath!gatam pann"
payam"no pann"peyya tam rupam tath"gatassa pahinam
M.N.2 P.48
20. M"gandiya sutta: 1ath"gatassa danto gutto rakkhito
samuto. - M.N. 5 P. 503
21. Makh"dea Sutta: Na ak"ranena 1ath"gat" sitam
p"tukaronti. - M.N. 83 P. 4
22. Lsuk"ri Sutta: 1ath"gatappaveditam dhamma inayam
"gamma p"n"tip"t" patiirato hoti. - M.N. 96 P. 181
23. Subha Sutta: Na tea 1ath"gatassa brahmalokam "
brahma lokag"minim " patipadam putthassa M.N. 99 P. 20
24. Deadaha sutta: Lam"di bhikkhae 1ath!gato,
eam"dim bhikkhae 1ath"gatam dasa sahadhammik".
M.N. 101 P. 22
25. Sunakkhatta Sutta: Bhisakko sallakatto ti kho sunakkhatta
1ath!gatassa etam adhiacanam arahato samm"
sambuddhassa. - M.N. 105 P.260
26. Ganakamoggall"na Sutta: 1ath!gato purisadammam
labhit" pathamam eam ineti - M.N. 10 P.2
2. Chabbisodhana Sutta: 1ath"gatena anuttaram
dhammacakkam paattitam sammadea anuppaatteti M.N.
112 P. 29
28. Bahudhatuka Sutta: 1h"nam ca kho etam ijjati yam
puttujjano duttho citto 1ath!gatassa lohitam upp"deyya -
M.N. 115 P.65
29. Mah"sunnata sutta: Ayam kho pana Ananda ih"ro
1ath!gatassa abhisambuddho yadidam.M.N. 122 P.111
30. Dantabhumi Sutta: 1ath"gato uttarim ineti. Lhitam
bhikkhu k"ye k"yanupassi iharahi. M.N. 125 P. 136
31. Dakkhin"ibhanga Sutta: 1ath!gate parinibbute ubhato
sanghe d"nam deti - M.N. 142. P.255
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 253
SAMYU11A NIK#YA
1. 1hath!gatassa buddhassa sabbabhut"nu kampino - S.N.
1.1.4.5. P.25
2. 1ath!gatam arahantam candim" saranamgato S.N. 1.11.1.9
P.50
3. 1ath!gatam arahantam suriyo saranamgato S.N. 1.11,1.10.
P.51
4. 1ath!gata balappatt" 1inn" loke isattikam S.N. 1.II. 1.10.
P.50
5. Apunnam pasaim"ro Asajjanam 1ath!gatam S.N. 1. IV
2.8 P.114
6. \atra hi n"ma 1ath!gatassa Arahato samm" sambuddhassa
appossukkat"ya cittam namati no dhammadesan"ya- S.N.
1.VI.1.1. P.13
. landad"ni bhikkhae "mantay"mi o appam"dena
samp"detha ayadhamm" sankh"ra ayam 1ath!gatassa
pacchim" "c" S.N. I.VI. 2.5 P.158
8. Annatra br"hmana 1ath!gatassa " 1ath"gata s"akkassa
" S.N. 1. VII. 1.9. P.168
9. So 1ath!gatappavedite dhamma vinaye saddham
sam"diyit" silam sam"diyit" sutam sam"diyit" S.N. 1. XI.
2.4. P.232
10. Lte te kassapa ubho ante anupagamma majjhena 1ath!gato
dhammam deseti S.N. 11, XII. 1 P.20
11. Upp"d" " 1ath"gat"nam anuppada " 1ath!gat!nam thit"
a s" dh"tu dhammatthitat" dhamma niy"mat" idappaccayat"
S.N. 11. XII. 20 P.25
12. Dasabala samann"gato bhikkhae 1ath!gato catuhi ca
es"rajjehi Samann"gato "sabhan th"nam Patij"n"ti - S.N. 11.
X11. 21. P.2
254 At t achment and Det achment
13. Rupa..edan".sann".sankh"ra..inn"nadh"tuy" kho
gahapati yo chando yo r"go y" nandi y" tanh" ye
up"yup"d"na cetaso adhitth"n"bhinies"nusay" te
1ath"gatassa pahin" ucchinnamul" t"l"atthukat"
anabh"akat" "yatim anupp"da dhamm" tasm" 1ath!gato
anokas"riti uccati- S.N. 111. XXII. 3.8 P.10
14. Ayam kho bhikkhae iseso ayam adhippayo so idham
n"nakaranam
15. 1ath!gatassa arahato Samm" Sambuddhassa
pann"imuttena
16. bhikkhun"ti - S.N. III.XXII. 58 P.66
1. 1ath!gatassa dhammadesanam sut" yebhuyyena bhayam
samegam sant"sam "pajjanti. S.N. III. 1athXXII. 8 P.85
18. 1am kim annasi "uso \amaka rupam 1ath!gato ti
samanupassasi edanam. sannam.. sankh"ra.. - S.N. III.
XXII. 85 P.6
19. \o so "uso 1ath"gato uttamapuriso Parama puriso parama
pattipatto tam 1ath"gato annatra imehi catuhi th"nehi
Pann"payamano pann"peti. loti 1ath"gato param
maran".III. XXII. 86 P.116
20. Sabbam atthiti kho kacc"na ayam eko anto sabbam natthiti
ayam dutiyo anto. Lte te kacc"na ubho ante anupagamma
majjhena 1ath"gato dhammam deseti - S.N. III. XXII. 90
P.135
21. 1hath!gato ca kho bhikkhae araham Samm"sambuddho
rup"nam samudayam ca atthagaman ca ass"dam ca "dinaan
ca nissaranam ca yath"bhutam idit" na rup"r"mo na
ruparato na rupasamudito S.N. IV. XXXV. 136 P.12
22. Lamea kho mah"r"ja yena rupena 1ath!gatam
pann"payam"no pann"peyya tam rupam tath"gatassa
pahinam ucchinnamulam t"laatthu katam anabh"akatam
ayatim anupp"da katam. S.N. IV. XLIV 1. P. 34
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 255
23. 1ath!gato ca kho Vaccha araham samm"sambuddho na
rupam. edanam. sannam.sankhare. inn"nam.
attato samanupassati. - S.N. IV XLIV. 8 P. 396
24. \"at" bhikkhae satt" ap"d" " dip"d" " catupp"d" "
bahupp"d" " rupino " arupino " sannino " asannino "
neasannin"sannino " 1ath!gato tesam aggam akkh"yati.
S.N. V. XLV. 139 P.41-42
25. 1ath!gatassa kho Ananda na eam hoti. Aham bhikkhu
sangham parihariss"mi ti " mamuddesiko bhikkhu sangho ti
". S.N. V. XLVII. 9 P. 153
26. S"dhu s"dhu S"riputta eso hi S"riputta anuttaro yogakkhemo
yam Sampassam"no khin"sao bhikkhu 1ath!gato "
1ath"gatassa ne a paramanipaccak"ram paattamano
paatteti S.N. V XLVIII. 58 P. 234
27. Ayam kho s" bhikkhae majjhim" patipad" 1ath!gatena
abhisambuddh" cakkhu karani n"na karani upasam"ya
abhinn"ya sambodh"ya nibb"n"ya samattati S.N. V. LVI.
12.1. P.420
ANGU11ARA NIK#YA
1. 1ath!gatena bh"sitam lapitam 1ath"gaten"ti dipenti 1.1.X.
P.18-19
2. 1ath!gatassa arahato Samm" Sambuddhassa 1.1. XIII P.22
3. Dem" bhikkhae 1ath!gatassa dhammadesan" katam"
de Sankhittena ca itth"rena ca A.N. 1. 11.11. P.53
4. De me bhikkhae 1ath!gatam abbh"cikkhanti katame
de Duttho " dosantaro saddho " duggahitena - A.N.
1.II. III P.59
5. Katam" ca bhikkhae ukkacita init" paris" no patipuccha -
Vinit" Idha bhikkhae yassam parisayam bhikkhu ye te
suttant" 1ath"gat" bhasit" gambhir" gambhiratth" lokuttar"
- A.N. 1.11.V. P.2
256 At t achment and Det achment
6. De me bhikkhae puggal" loke uppajjam"n" uppajjanti
bahujanahit"ya bahujana sukh"ya bahuno janassa atth"ya
hit"ya sukh"ya dea manuss"nam. Katame de. 1ath"gato
ca araham Samm" Sambuddho r"j" ca cakkaatti1.II.VI. P.6
. 1athagate ca 1ath"gatasaake ca A.N. 1.II.XII. P.91
8. Idha bhikkhae ekacco puggalo labhanto " 1ath"gatam
dassan"ya alabhanto " 1ath"gatam dassan"ya A.N. 1.III.22
P.121
9. Upp"d" " bhikkhae 1ath!gat"nam anupp"d" "
1ath"gat"nam. A.N. 1.III. 134 P. 286
10. Catt"rim"ni bhikkhae 1ath!gatassa es"rajjh"ni A.N.
11.IV 8 P.8
11. Loko bhikkhae 1ath!gatena abhisambuddho lokasm"
1ath"gato-isamyuttolokasamuday" bhikkhae
1ath"gatena. - A.N. 11. IV23 P.23
12. Lam mahiddhiko kho bhikkhae 1ath!gato sadeakassa
lokassa eam mahesakkho eam mah"nubh"o A.N. 11.IV
33 P.33
13. \aat" bhikkhae sangh" " gan" " 1ath!gatassa s"aka
sangho tesam aggam akkh"yati - A.N. 11.IV 34 P.34
14. V"dho heso kesi ariyassa inaye yam na 1ath!gato
attabbam anus"sitabbam - A.N. 11.IV.111. P.113
15. Idha 1ath!gato j"to ti bhikkhae saddhassa kulaputtassa
dassaniyam samejaniyam th"nam. idha samm"
sambodhim
abhisambuddho..idhadhammacakkampaattesiti.idha
anup"dises"yanibb"na dh"tuy" parinibbuto A.N. 11.IV.118
P.120
16. 1ath!gatassa bhikkhae arahato samm" sambuddhassa
p"tubh"" ime catt"ro acchariya abbhuta dhamm"
p"tubh"anti - A.N. 11.IV. 12 P.131
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 25
1. 1ath!gato araham samm"sambuddho atthannu
dhammannu mattannu parisannu .111.V.CXXXI. P. 148
18. 1ath!gato araham samma sambuddho dhammiko
dhammar"j" dhammam yea niss"ya - A.N.111.V.CXXXIII
P.150
19. 1ath!gatappavedite dhamma inaye desiyam"ne A.N.
111.V.CXL P.163
20. 1ath!gatassa arahato samm" sambuddhassa p"tubhao
dullabho lokasmin - A.N. 111.V.CXLIII. P.168
21. 1ath!gatassa bhikkhae arahato samm"sambuddhassa
pubbea sambodh" anabhisam buddhassa A.N 111.
V.CXCVI P.240
22. Idha Kimbila 1ath!gate parinibbute bhikkhu bhikkhuniyo
up"sak" up"sikayo satthari ag"rae iharanti A.N.
111.V.CCL P.24
23. \o ca kho bhikkhae 1ath!gatassa " 1ath"gatas"akassa
" dhammasaan"ya gacchati niittha saddho niittha pemo
ekantagato abhippasanno A.N. 111. VI. XXX. P. 326
24. Lam pi kho Ananda 1ath!gatassa "yatim dhamm"
samuppado cetas" ceto pariccaidito hoti - A.N. 111. VI.
LXII P.409
25. Cha yimani bhikkhae 1ath!gatassa 1athagatabal"ni. \ehi
balehi samann"gato tath"gato "sabhan..A.N. 111.VI.LXIV.
P.41
26. 1ath!gatappavedite dhamma inaye agarasm" anag"riyam
pabbajjam - A.N. IV.VIII.LI. P.26
2. Sihoti kho bhikkhae 1ath!gatassa etam adhiacanam
arahato samm" sambuddhassa - A.N.V.X.XXI. P.33
28. 1ath!gatena abh"sitam alapitam 1ath"gatena ti dipenti
A.N. V.X.XXXVI P.4
258 At t achment and Det achment
29. 1ath"gato loke uppajjati araham samm" Sammabuddho
tasm" 1ath"gatappaedito dhamma inayo loke dipenti
V.LXXVI P.144
30. \asmin Mah"n"ma samaye ariyas"ako 1ath"gatam
anussarati neassa tasmimsamaye r"gapariyutthitam cittam
hoti na dosapariyutthitam cittam hoti na mohapariyutthitam
cittam hoti. A.N. V.XII.XIII. P.333
1hus, we can see in many texts where the term 1ath!gata
has been mentioned in the irst our Nik"yas. 1ath"gata means
the Perect One. Literally, the one who has thus gone or
the one who has thus come. It is an epithet of the
Buddha used by him when speaking of himself. 1he term
has derived from tatha or tath! in P!li, which means
thus and truth or reality. So when the term taken
with the suffix gata (1ath! + gata) provides the meaning,
thusgone, and when the term is made by the suffix
!gata(1ath!+!gata) provides the meaning, thus come.
1his term is ound in the elaboration o the causal
conditioning o the Buddha too. In the Pacca,a vtta o the
^ia!va 1agga in av,vtta ^i/!,a, explaining the causal
happening and things as haing causally happened, the Buddha
said, Iti kho bhikkhae y" tatra tathat", aitathat", anannathat",
idappaccayat", ayam uccati bhikkhae paticcasamupp"do`. lor
which, Mrs. Rhys Daids urnishes the meanings in Kivarea
a,ivg. as ollows, 1hus, brethren that which here is such wise,
not else wise, not otherwise the relatedness o this to that: this
brethren is called causal happening`.
1
In the aboe passage, the three words tathat"`, aitathat"`,
and anannathat"`, are ery important or our study. 1hese three
are the characteristics o the 1ruth. Reerring to within this
1 S.N.II.I.20 Sutta P.22
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 259
context, the Buddha has declared the real existence o the world
by explaining the Dependent Origination ,Paticcasamupp"da,.
Since the term is related to truth, 1athat! yields the meaning
thatness or suchness literally, reality. Aitathat" means
the truth that cannot be changed and proed in its negatie
aspect. Anannat" is that one which cannot proide alternaties
o suchness` or truth`. So, the three terms indicate some
characteristics of reality. 1herefore, in the term
1ath!gata, tatha means reality, or the 1ruth, that is
Nibb!na. Accordingly, all those who have come or gone to
the state of reality or Nibb!na are called 1ath!gatas.
As we mentioned earlier, this term 1ath"gata` is an
undeined term. In the P"li 1ext Society`s P!tivgti.b Dictiovar,,
it is explained that Buddhaghosa himsel was in doubt about the
deriation o the term. Neertheless, it is accepted that the term
has been used as an epithet o an Arahant. It says the term
(1ath!gata) has not yet been found in any pre-Buddhist
work.
1
In the Dictiovar, of Pati Proer ^ave., Pro. Gunap"la
Malalasekara states giing the meaning to 1ath"gata:
An epithet o the Buddha used by the Buddha in
reerring to himsel. 1he commentaries gie eight
,sometimes expanded to sixteen, explanations o the word,
which shows that there was probably no ixed tradition on
the point. 1he explanations indicate that the name can be
used or any arahant, and not necessarily only or a
Buddha. 1he term was eidently pre-Buddhistic, though it
was not yet been ound in any pre-buddhistic work.
2
1 Pali-Lnglish Dictionary- See 1ath"gata
2 DPPN Vol. I. P. 989. Published by 1he Pali 1ext Society London -194
260 At t achment and Det achment
On the other hand, R.C.Childers says, in his Dictionary, .
Dictiovar, of tbe Pati avgvage giing the meaning to 1ath"gata as:
A sentient being ,satto,, a Buddha. It is quite eident
that the term 1ath"gata was irst applied to a sentient
being generally and aterwards transerred to a Buddha. As
a name or a Buddha, it means the Being Par-Lxcellence,
the Great Being. Gautama Buddha, in the Suttas
requently speaks o himsel as the 1ath"gata.
1
lrom the expressions o the scholars o the old days, along
with present day scholars, we can understand that there is no
unanimity regarding this term.
Some say that it has been used to denote the being ,satto,,
while others preer to say that it has been used in the Canon to
denote the Arahants. loweer, all agree that the term has been
used in the Canonical 1exts by the Buddha, in reerring to
himsel.
In our surey, we could not ind any place where the term
1ath"gata` has been clearly used to denote the being ,satto, or
Arahant.
Certainly, there are some places where it is not clear that the
term reers either to the Buddha or to the Arahant, such as in
.ggiraccbagotta vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a ,2. Sutta,, Yava/a
vtta ,III.XXI. 85 P.6, and .vvraaba vtta ,III.86 P.116, o the
av,vtta ^i/!,a, where the term starts with simple t` instead o
capital 1` as it occurs in P.1.S. books.
\e may conclude that the term can be used or Arahants too.
loweer, I hae not been able to trace eidence to proe that
the term 1ath"gata has been used in the irst our Nik"yas to
denote a being` ,satto,. I any scholar can point out that, this
1 DPL. Published by Cosmo Publication New Delhi- 199
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 261
term has been mentioned in relation to a being ,satto, in the irst
our Nik"yas, I would humbly and grateully accept the
correction.
With that, I clearly say that the term 1ath!gata has
been used in the Iour Nik!yas, mostly in referring to the
Buddha himself. Lventhough some do not like to see a
distinction between the Buddha and the Arahants, other
than the precedence of the Buddha,
J
I can say, without any
hesitation that the Buddha and his characteristics are
completely different and exalted from Arahants.
1hus we can say as a conclusion, that Arahants are the
detached ones in the world, and they never immerse
themselves in the mud of defilements. 1hey are as pure as
drops of water on lotus leaves. 1hose Lnlightened Ones are
not super-human beings. 1hey lie in society but always as
unattached ones.
According to the !vavvabata vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a, they
are the men who stand on the bank o the pool o water,
explained thus:
O King, as i in a mountain astness, there was a pool o
water, clear, translucent, and serene. A man ,men,
standing on the bank haing eyes to see, would perceie
the oysters and shells, the grael and pebbles, and the
shoals o ish as they moe about or lie within it. le
would know: 1his pool is clear, transparent, and serene,
and there, within it, are the oysters and shells, the sand and
grael, the shoals o ish, which are moing about or lying
still.`
2
1 Buddhist Images o luman Perection. P. 98
2 D.N. 2 Sutta
262 At t achment and Det achment
1he pool is nothing but the world. 1he men who stand on
the bank o Sams"ra are Arahants. 1hey can see properly how
beings are moing in the world. 1hose Arahants hae completed
their journey, the inal emancipation o Nibb"na. 1hey lie in the
present moment. 1hey relect neither on their past nor on their
uture. Boundlessly they sere all beings in the world.
##########
CHAP1LR LIGH1
CONCLUSION
I was inspired to write on Attachment ,up"d"na, and
Detachment ,anup"d"na, because o the knowledge and
experience gained throughout many years in the ield o
Buddhist studies and monastic lie.
1he Buddha has reealed two aspects to lie. 1hese two are
the nature o the cycle o births and deaths or Sams"ra, and the
way to escape rom this cycle, i.e. Nibb"na. Beings are born and
die again and again. 1hroughout the span o lie, they are either
attached to things in the world or repelled rom things in the
world. Detachment is in the middle. 1hat is to be experienced
within this span o lie ollowing the Middle \ay. 1hereore, it is
not one`s birth or death that is so signiicant, how or where they
were born or die, but how one lies during this span o years
between these two eents.
1he Buddha taught more about attachment and reulsion
than about Detachment ,Nibb"na,. Attachment and reulsion
are the main actors o lie to be realized by onesel. In a broader
sense, these two could be considered as the undamental
teachings o the Buddha. In his ery irst sermon itsel,
attachment was explained as craing ,tanh",.
Up!d!na or attachment is a general inclination of man.
1he emancipation in Buddhism is Detachment from
craving. 1his craving is to be eradicated here and now, in
this very life as a human being by being detached from
264 At t achment and Det achment
both attachment and revulsion. We understand that in
almost all religions the Summum Bonum may be reached
only after death. However, Nibb!na or Detachment in
Buddhism, can be realized in this very life, therefore, it is
not necessary to wait until we die for this attainment.
In the Mab! atiattb!va vtta o the Digba ^i/!,a, these two
terms ,attachment and reulsion, are dealt with, abhijjh! and
domanassa. Vineyya loke abhijjh! domanassam the
Buddha said. 1hese two are to be aoided by the wise who
mindully and strenuously meditate to eradicate deilements.
\hen the extremes are aoided, Detachment or
Lmancipation takes place. Now we see clearly that this
avoidance itself is Nibb!na.
Both Up"d"na and Anup"d"na hae been described in the
P"li Canon in an explicit manner. I one wishes to paractice
Buddhism, one should understand attachment as an extreme, as
well as, its direct opposite extreme o reulsion. Only then, can
be realized Detachment, Nibb"na.
1he Buddha by his own wisdom realized both attachment
and detachment as the two paths that lead to Sams"ra and
Nibb"na. 1his is reealed through his central teaching`, the
lour Noble 1ruths.
Suering or Unsatisactoriness o lie is the result o
attachment, i.e. up"d"na. It takes place because o craing
,tanh",. Craing is the root cause o suering, in other words,
the arising o suering. 1hese two, suering and the arising o
suering, explain Sams"ra ,Up"d"na, while the cessation o
suering and the path leading to the cessation o suering,
explain Nibb"na ,Anup"d"na,.
One should realize the nature o attachment, which maniests
the real existence o beings` and the world`. 1his realization
itsel is detachment. D"na or generosity is one way to experience
detachment in our daily lie. D"na means giing away, this is the
harbinger o detachment ,Nibb"na,.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 265
In general, beings are born to this world and are attached to
things, this is a continuous process. According to the
.ri,aari,e.ava vtta o the Ma;;biva ^i/!,a, the Buddha
explained attachment as an Un-Ariyan Quest ,Anariya
Pariyesan",, and haing understood the peril, seeking the utmost
reedom rom the bonds as the Ariyan Quest ,Ariya
Pariyesan",, that is Detachment ,Nibb"na,
People in society preer to go with the current ,anusotag"mi,,
by attaching to whateer transpires in society, just like the stream
that lows in one direction. Neertheless, Buddhism leads one
against the stream ,patisotag"mi,. 1he Buddha said:
Kicchena me adhigatam-haland"ni pak"situm
R"gadosa paretehi-n"yam dhammo susambudho
Patisotag"mim nipunam-gambhiram duddasam anum
R"garatt" na dakkhinti-tamokkhandhena "at"`
,1his, that through many toils I`e won enough!
\hy should I make it known
By olk with lust and hate consumed.
1his Dhamma with not be understood.
Leading on against the stream, deep, subtle,
Diicult to see, delicate, unseen,
It will be by passions slaes
Cloaked in the murk o ignorance,.
1
1he prime aim o the Buddha was to lead the people to
Detachment. Most people are passion`s slaes ,r"garatt",.
1 M.N. 26 Sutta
266 At t achment and Det achment
1hereore, it is diicult or them to ollow the teaching o
Detachment. 1he Buddha said that this Dhamma is or the wise,
not or the ool, hence, or teaching o the Dhamma the Buddha
used arious ways and means. I hae made an eort to point out
numerous occasions where the Buddha has taught the teaching
o detachment, mainly in the Sutta Pitaka.
1he Buddha did not spent hours teaching the
characteristics of Detachment or Nibb!na simply because
it must be experienced by the individual by means of
practicing insight and wisdom. Nibb!na is something
ineffable, beyond the experience of the six (6) senses. Na-
up"d"na` or Anup"d"na is a term used indicating detachment in
the Canon. According to the Mah" Niddesa, there are three
kinds o detachment, these are:
1. Bodily detachment ,k"ya ieka,,
2. Mental detachment ,citta ieka,, and
3. Detachment rom the substrata o existence ,upadhi
ieka, respectiely.
1he term ieka has been used in the Pali Canon to denote
detachment. loweer, the term detachment is not suicient to
explain the real meaning deried rom the term ieka` in Pali.
Upadhi ieka` or detachment rom the substrata o existence
is ery important in this context. It traces the characteristics o
Nibb"na. 1he three terms k!ya viveka, citta viveka, and
upadhi viveka, represent Sila (morality), Sam!dhi
(concentration), and Pa! (wisdom). Lradication o greed,
hatred, and delusion, is Nibb"na. I explained these three
unwholesome roots and their opposites or the better
understanding o the root causes o deilements. Lradication o
deilement means eradication o those causes o merit and
demerit.
Detachment is the highest mental state gained by
oneself being in the middle, avoiding both attachment and
revulsion. One should not think this to be an uncaring
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 26
state. It is an equanimous state of mind. When one is not
attached to anything, one may be repelled by things in the
world. I pointed out, in this manner that being mindful,
one can conquer this world as well as the world after death.
According to the teaching of the Buddha, the final
emancipation or Nibb!na itself is to be realized by being
mindful. While practicing mindfulness one can develop
one's wisdom. Wisdom and compassion are the two most
important factors in Buddhism. Buddhism whether
1herav!da or Mah!y!na is based on these two factors.
According to 1hera"da 1radition, both insight and wisdom
are to be deeloped by onesel to attain Lnlightenment. In each
and eery moment, we emphatically say that mindulness is ery
important or eeryone in daily lie. \hen one is practicing the
Dhamma, one is able to delight in heedulness and iew
heedlessness with ear. Certainly, he will not all but mindul and
wise, he does not cling to anything o the past, present, or uture
such a one is undoubtedly in the presence o Nibb"na.
In the last chapter o this book, we hae attempted to
describe some characteristics o the Lnlightened Ones. In order
to do this, we made a brie surey o the irst ovr ^i/!,a..
Lspecially, in this last chapter, we had to look into the term
1ath"gata, because o the prealent controersy regarding the
term.
Some o our scholars state that the term applies to Arahants
also while a ew suggest that it implies a being ,satto, too.
loweer, as I did this surey, I dare to say that except or in two
or three contexts, in the irst ovr ^i/!,a., the term 1ath"gata
268 At t achment and Det achment
has been employed in the sense o the Supreme Lnlightened
one.
1
I hae gien many reerences rom the ovr ^i/!,a..
1here are two or three places where the term starts with a
simple t`, but in most places it starts with the capital letter. I
did not consider whether it is capital or simple. \hat I
considered was whether it stands or the Buddha, an Arahant or
a being.
Reerring to the irst ovr ^i/!,a., I do not come to a
conclusion about the term in some places, especially, where the
ourold way o questioning as regards the 1ath"gata ,hoti
tath"gato parammaran", na hoti tath"gato param maran", hoti ca
na hoti ca tath"gato parammaran" ne a hoti na na hoti tath"gato
parammaran",.
In one instance, in the .v!!va.ati vtta o the Ma;;biva
^i/!,a, I came across the word 1ath!sato instead
1ath!gato. I examined it reerring to Sinhala ersion o the
sutta also, but ound that there is no apparent relation between
the two terms, 1ath"sato` and 1ath"gato`. 1his may be a
printing mistake and I happened to ind the error. In the Sutta,
there is an adjectial phrase, which reads as 1ath" sato
iharanto`. loweer, or the compilation o the P"li 1ext, the
two words 1ath"` and Sato` hae been connected.
1ath"` here means thus`, sato`...mindul, and iharanta`
indicates, to lie`. 1hereore, the whole phrase gies the
meaning while thus he is living mindfully. Grammatically,
iharanto` is nominatie singular. Now we can understand
what happened and how the two words 1ath"` and Sato`
became one as 1ath"sato`.
1 Dr. \alpola Rahula, in his masterpiece, "\hat the Buddha 1aught" ,Page.1, says, '1athagata' lit. means,
'One who has come to 1ruth' i.e., 'One who has discoered 1ruth'.1his is the term ususally used by the
Buddha reerring to himsel and to the Buddhas in general.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 269
Actually, I do not consider it a ery big error. Neertheless,
we should be mindul enough to understand the Dhamma as it
is, according to the Canonical 1ext.
lor those who wish to study the 1ath"gata Concept`
urther, I hae made a list o the places where it is mentioned in
the major ovr ^i/!,a. in the Sutta Pitaka, though I should say
that I did not mention the places where the term is repeated.
loweer, I eel that this collection o mine will be a great asset
or uture inestigations or any who care to pursue it.
In conclusion, I can summarize the actors o the Dhamma
that I wanted to express in this book under the ollowing ie
topics:
1. Mivafvtve.. i. tbe vo.t ivortavt factor iv racticivg
tbe teacbivg of tbe vaaba to attaiv Detacbvevt.
2. 1be terv 1atb!gata, iv tbe P!ti Cavov, ba. beev
evto,ea vaivt, to aevote tbe vreve vtigbtevea
Ove., tbe vaaba..
. .ttacbvevt i. a tbree aivev.iovat terv ;aaberivg,
gra.ivg, ava ctivgivg)
1. .ttacbvevt ;v!a!va) ava Detacbvevt ;avv!a!va)
covta be etaivea tbrovgb tbe vaabi.t covtet to
ittv.trate tbe vatvre of av.!ra ava ^ibb!va
:. .ttacbvevt ava rervt.iov botb .bovta be covrebevaea
ava aroiaea for tbe attaivvevt of Detacbvevt
;^ibb!va) a. tbe Miaate !a,.
#####LND#####
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Digha Nik"ya ,Dialogues o the Buddha, 1ranslated by
1.\.Rhys Daids and published by 1he P"li 1ext Society -
London.
2. Majjhima Nik"ya ,Middle length Sayings, 1ranslated by I.B.
lorner and Published by 1he P"li 1ext Society - London.
3. Samyutta Nik"ya ,Kindred Sayings, 1ranslated by Mrs. Rhys
Daids and l.L.\oodward, and published by 1he P"li 1ext
Society - London.
4. Anguttara Nik"ya ,Gradual Sayings, 1ranslated by
l.L.\oodward and L.M.lare, and published by 1he P"li
1ext Society - London.
5. Aj"hn Sumedho, Now is knowing. Amar"wati Publication
1989
6. Bodhi Bhikkhu. 1he Noble Lightold Path \heel
Publication No. 308,311 BPS - 1984
. Bodhi Bhikkhu.1he Discourse on the lruits o Recluseship,
Published by Buddhist Publication Society Kandy - 1989
8. Bodhi Bhikkhu. Majjhima Nik"ya, Published by Buddhist
Publication society Kandy - 1995
9. Buddhad"sa Bhikkhu. A.B.C. o Buddhism Printed by Suan
Mokkh, Chaiya, 1hailand -1982
10. Buddhad"sa Bhikkhu. landbook or Mankind, Printed by
1he Buddhad"sa loundation, 1he Sublime Lie Mission,
68,4 1anao Road Bangkok, 1hailand.
11. Buddhad"sa Bhikkhu. leartwood o the Bodhi 1ree,
\isdom Publication Boston - 1994
12. Brewster. L.l. 1he Lie o Gotam Buddha- 195.
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 21
13. Bhaktiedanta Sw"mi Prabhup"da. Bhagaad-gita- Printed
by M,S Sanman & Co.113 Shir Shakti Ind. Lstate, Andheri
Bombay 1991
14. Childers R.C. A Dictionary o the Pali Language, Published
by Cosmo Publication New Delhi- 199
15. Dhamm"nanda Ven. K.Sri. low to lie without ear and
worry, Buddhist Missionary Society Malaysia - 1989
16. Dhirasekara Jotiya. Buddhist Monastic Discipline, M.D.
Gunasena & co. Ltd Colombo -1982
1. Duraisingam. 1. Marxism - Leninism, Published by Council
or Socialist Studies 31. \ilson Street Colombo 12 - 1993
18. Llizabeth J larris Detachment and Compassion in Larly
Buddhism, Bodhi Leaes No 141. Buddhist Publication
society Kandy 199
19. lranklin Ldgerton. Buddhist lybrid Sanskrit Grammar and
Dictionary, - 1985
20. Gunaratana lenepola. Ven. Mindulness in plain Lnglish,
published by \isdom Publication Boston U.S.A. -1993
21. George Grimm. 1he Doctrine o the Buddha - 1982.
22. laripada Chakraborty. Asceticism in Ancient India ,in
Brahmanical, Buddhist, Jaina and Ajiika Societies,.,
Published by Punthi Pustaka Culcutta -193
23. Johansson Rune L.A., 1he Psychology O Nirana, George
Allen and Unwin Ltd London -1969
24. Johansson Rune L.A., 1he Dynamic Psychology o Larly
Buddhism Oxord Curzon Press 199
25. John A McConnell. Mindul Mediation, Published by
Buddhist Research Institute Mahachula Buddhist Uniersity
and SLM \ongsanit Ashram 1hailand -1995
26. Jayasuriya \.l.Dr. the Psychology and Philosophy o
Buddhism, Published by \.M.B.A. Colombo - 1963
22 At t achment and Det achment
2. Karun"dasa. \. Buddhist Analysis o Matter, Published by
the Department o Cultural Aairs Colombo-196
28. Kalupahana Daid J. Mula M"dhyamaka K"rik" ,N"garjua
the Philosophy o the Middle \ay,, Published by the State
Uniersity New \ork - 1986
29. Kalupahana Daid J, 1he Principles o Buddhist Psychology.
State Uniersity o New \ork Press-198
30. L"m" Anag"rika Goinda, 1he Psychological attitude o
Larly Buddhist Philosophy, Rider & Company London-1961
31. Mah" Ghosananda 1hero. Step by Step Cambodia-1992
32. Max Muller and Oldenberg. Vedic lymns, Published by
Motilal Banarsidass India-199.
33. N"namoli Bhikkhu. 1he lie o the Buddha-1984
34. Ny"natiloka Ven. Buddhist Dictionary, Published by
Buddhist Publication Society Kandy - 1988
35. N"rada Mah" 1hera. A Manual o Abhidhamma, Buddhist
Publication Society Kandy - 1968
36. N"n"r"ma Mah" 1hera M"tara. 1he Seen Stages o
Puriication and Insight Knowledges. - 1983
3. Nathan Katz. Buddhist Images o luman Perection, - 1982
38. Psychological Lthics ,Dhamma Sangini, Published by 1he
Pali 1ext Society - London.
39. Piyadassi 1hera. 1he Book o Protection Published by
Buddhist Publication Society Kandy - 1981
40. Piyadassi 1hera. 1he Spectrum o Buddhism, Published by
Karun"ratna & sons Limited Colombo - 1991
41. Padmasiri de Sila, Buddhist and lreudian Psychology,
Printed by Lake louse, 41 \.A.D. R"man"yake M"watha
Colombo 2-193
Bhi kkhu Seel "nanda 23
42. Piyadassi 1hera. 1he Buddha`s Ancient Path, Published by
Karun"ratna & Sons Colombo - 198
43. Pe Maung 1in. 1he Path o Purity, Published by 1he Pali
1ext Society London - 195
44. R"hula \alpola \hat the Buddha 1aught, Printed by Unwin
Brothers Ltd Great Britain 192
45. Ranasinghe C.P. 1he Buddha`s Lxplanation o the Unierse,
Published by Lanka Bauddha Mandalaya lund, 135 1urret
Road, Colombo - 195
46. Rhys Daid. Pali-Lnglish Dictionary, Published by 1he Pali
1ext Society London - 1949
4. Robert S \oodwarth, Contemporary School o Psychology,
Morrison and Gibb Ltd London 1956
48. Soma 1hera. 1he \ay o Mindulness, Buddhist Publication
Society - 1981
49. Sona Kanthi Barua Ven. Buddhist 1hought and Meditation
in the Nuclear age, \at Chulaprathan Ranggstit Nantaburi
1hailand - 198
50. 1hich Nhat lanh. Ven. Peace is Lery Step - 1991
51. Vajiragn"na Para"hera Ven. Buddhist Meditation, Published
by M.D. Gunasena & Co.Ltd. Colombo - 1962
52. \ijesekara O.l.de A. Buddhist and Vedic Studies, Published
by Motilal Banargidass India - 1994
53. \ettimuny R.G .de S. Buddhism and its Relation to Religion
and Science, Published by Buddhist Research society
Singapore.
54. \ettimuny R G de S 1he Buddha`s 1eaching, Printed by
M.D. Gunasena & Co. Ltd 1969
55. \illiam Mcdougall, An outline o Psychology, Methuen &
Co Ltd 36 Lssex Street \.C. London -1949
24 At t achment and Det achment
56. Sri Lanka Journal o Buddhist Studies ,Buddhist and Pali
Uniersity o Sri Lanka, Vol. I. & IV
5. Sister Vajir" & lrancis Story. Last days o the Buddha.
Printed by Buddhist Publication Society Kandy-1988.
~. ,.. ,.....
.. .., ,.. .. , .. . ,
, .. . . .. , . , .. . ,,. ..
., .. . . . .. ...
:.,.
#########
Lnglish Index
Acquisition, 42
Aggregates, 156
Analysis, 46, 49
Asceticism, 125
Aersion, 63
Being,s, 11, 16, 18, 25, 52, 64,
0, 6, 83, 8, 116, 140, 153,
155, 11, 194, 199, 202, 220,
243, 260, 263
Cessation, 5
Chemistry, 4
Commentary, 22, 82
Communication, 221
Compassion, 55
Conucius, 4
Consciousness, 136, 200, 238
Contemplation, 64, 156
Cosmic, 34
Craing, 5, 264
Creator, 34, 3
Delierance, 52, 181, 182, 232
Lgo, 2, 20
Lmancipation, 141, 16, 233,
264
Lnlightenment, 4, 16, 25, 53,
1, 2, 80, 81, 84, 98, 101,
109, 112, 115, 125, 126, 145,
146, 148, 15, 168, 12, 202,
219, 228, 243, 249, 26
Lquanimity, 18
Lquanimous, 96
Lradication, 15, 266
Lssential, 90
Lternalism, 51, 8, 103
God, 34
Grasping, 19, 23, 119, 230
luxley, 54, 66
Ignorance, 153
Insight, 211
Marx, 32
Matter, 46, 48, 49, 156
Meditation, 53, 66, 119, 211,
212, 233
Mental, 56, 12, 16, 211, 266
Middle Path, 66, 96, 101, 102,
10, 109, 114, 115, 116, 122,
12, 128, 130, 133, 140
Mind, 59, 60, 156, 162, 16
Mindul, 2, 6, 111, 158
Monism, 8
Morality, 108, 110, 141, 146,
162
Nihilism, 51, 8, 103, 124
Norms, 151
Occidental, 155
Oriental, 155
Oxord, 54, 14
Peace, 139, 155, 12, 219, 232
Phenomena, 31
Philosophical,
Philosophy, 3, 5, 22, 24, 61, 1,
139, 182
Pluralism, 8
Psychological, 26, 35
Psychology, 4, 5, 24, 1
Recluse, 88, 89
Release, 146, 19, 233
Renunciation, 81
Requisites, 15
Reulsion, 134, 148
Scriptures, 21, 0, 80, 91, 189,
200
26 Attachment and Detachment
Shramanism, 8
Socialism, 222
Soullessness, 25, 200
Suering, 8, 20, 110, 232, 264
Supramundane, 10, 112, 16
1ruths, 8, 9, 10, 30, 38, 104,
10, 110, 19, 264
\anderer, 43, 194
\holesome, 64, 132
\isdom, 43, 69, 141, 144, 146,
181, 193, 26
\ondrous, 183
Pali Index
Abhabbo, 239, 240
Abhidhamma, 14, 20, 23, 31,
45, 46, 4, 49, 62, 22
Alagaddupama, 8, 11, 26, 3,
119, 182, 183, 250
An"gami, 16
Anicca, 83, 23
Anup"d", 45, 46, 151, 15, 244
Anup"d"imutta, 146
Anup"dinna, 48, 49, 50, 51
Anup"disesa, 53
Anup"tta, 50
Arahat, 228, 229
Asekhan"na, 243
Atman, 2
Aijj", 10
Bhaa, , 16
Brahman, 2, 3, 8
Cetoimutti, 181, 182
Citta, 59, 14
Dantabhumi, 252
Madhupindika, 11, 149
Magga, 9, 105, 10, 108, 112,
121
Mah"purisa, 6
Manu, 3, 33
Metta, 18
N"marupa, , 38, 165
Nirupadisesa, 39
Pann", 266
Param"tman, 2, 33
Pasupati, 125
Paticcasamupp"da, 2, 16, 259
Punarjanman, 2
Sam"dhi, 146, 266
Sams"ra, 1, , 8, 9, 1, 2, 4,
64, 3, 168, 12, 15, 16,
206, 211, 223, 224, 262, 263,
264, 269
Sangha, 28, 31, 222
Satipatthana, 60, 156, 21
Silabbata, 31
Sopadisesa, 38, 51, 52, 53
1iloguru, 10
Up"d", 45, 46, 4
Upadhi, 38, 42, 44, 45, 50, 5,
61, 266
Upadi, 38, 39, 44, 45, 50, 61
Up"dinna, 48, 49, 50, 51
Upanishad, 4, 33
Upanishadic, 2, 4, 5, 8
Up"tta, 50
Vedan", , 20
Vimansaka, 251
Vinn"na, 5, , 20
Vieka, , 55, 5, 61, 134, 155,
182
\onisomanasik"ra, 134
Jh"ya Bhikkhu! M" ca pam"do
M" te k"magune bhamassu cittam
M" lohagulam gili pamatto
M" kandi dukkhamidanti dayham"no
Meditate, O monks! Do not be heedless
Let not your mind whirl on sensual pleasures.
Do not be careless and swallow a red-hot iron ball.
As you burn, cry not O this is painul!`
1he Buddha ,Dh. 31,
#########