Visit to Mars

We ask The Committee to take us to another planet in our solar system.

Q: What does Mars look like if approached in a space ship?
C: Through your eyes, as would be necessary if such vessel were occupied by you, little would be
seen as you would require a camera to re-create the image.

Q: I never thought of that.
C: We suggest you are imagining the movies of human societies, and movement through air as could
be seen from aircraft. This is not similar on approach to a planet.

Q: Can you describe how it appears to you?
C: We suggest an edited videotape, where a segment may be accelerated and then returned to a pace
more normal to human movement. As we would approach the planet or any other, it would appear as a
small pinpoint; we would come close much faster and then seem to stop upon reaching the outer
atmosphere if there were one. Mars no longer has this.

Q: How intense is the sunlight on its surface?
C: It is dimmer than Earth by corresponding distance and reduction; the light speed and intensity of
photons reduces just as your scientific understanding calculates.

Q: Mars is fifty two percent farther from the sun than Earth, so I'd estimate about 34% less light. This
would be a lot brighter than a full moon, yes?
C: Certainly and you understand this amount of sunlight will support photosynthesis of many life
forms common on Earth and once did.

Q: What does the moon surface look like if a human were to stand on it and look around?
C: You would not, the heat would be unbearable for you; not the heat of the surface but of your body
from the unfiltered sunlight. The absent atmosphere means none is filtered; your Earth receives more light
but your atmosphere has large effects.

Q: We'd need a suit for air and protection from sunlight?
C: Yes, the sunlight would cause death faster than lack of air yet as you know, human existence
without atmospheric pressure is not possible.

Q: Assuming we had the required suit and air with a good helmet filter, what would we see?
C: The color seen from telescopes, the reddish tint of oxidized iron, would not appear this way. It
would look more like a brown desert of the many places on Earth.

Q: Is the surface rugged and varied?
C: Yes, just as Earth is without vegetation.

Q: The water remains below the surface?
C: Yes; the missing atmosphere of previous surface life allows no evaporation. There was for a short
period after the loss of the atmosphere, yet all moisture has sunk below the dry surface and is frozen, it
has solidified.

Q: Subsurface glaciers?
C: Yes, with far less movement as no gravity and descent as occurs on Earth.

Q: Does the surface move with tectonic plates, earthquakes tremors and similar things, like Earth?
C: Yes, and the surface contains most features which already existed with the heavy atmosphere.

Q: If we searched for them, would we find remnants of civilizations?
C: Yes, however greatly deteriorated and altered from the condition of the moments physical life
ended.

Q: Do surface temperatures shift abruptly?
C: There is much greater variation to both air and surface temperatures; the solid dust suspended in
the very thin atmosphere catches much sunlight energy and loses it nearly as quickly as light fades;
surface temperatures plummet as darkness arrives.

Q: Could we see Earth standing on the surface, with our naked eye?
C: Yes, it would appear as a bright star. In certain moments you would also see the Earth's moon
faintly but the human eye will generally not.

Q: Could the atmosphere sustain flight? Is there enough gaseous density to provide lift to a plane?
C: The wings would have to be very large and light and Earth technology does not permit this yet.
The gravity is a function of its mass. Being two thirds the size of Earth with about one twentieth the
atmosphere, much lift is needed to overcome it.

Q: So, no Earth type aircraft would fly there?
C: A helicopter would operate with many more blades yet its fuselage would be far smaller; this
assumes an energy source were available. There is almost no oxygen and combustion is not supported on
Mars. Nothing can be burned.

Q: What life is found there?
C: Nearly nothing of what you know on Earth; there are no seas and no plant life or vegetation. Any
breathing animal would perish even with proper respiration. There are microbes and other small growths
below the surface.

Q: What caused Mars' loss of atmosphere?
C: The gravitational pull of a planet remnant, escaped from the belt of asteroids. There were several
large fragments of the destroyed planet which were pulled from orbit; other large pieces were gradually
cast off as their gravitational pull both to and from other planets and the sun caused increasing elliptical
shifts and variations of orbit. The majority had no impact with other celestial or solar system objects and
were pulled towards the sun and then whipped out of the system. Some were pulled into the sun and
destroyed. One of the smaller from the large initial fragments was drawn close to Mars; its gravitational
pull was sufficiently strong to draw off Mars' atmosphere.

Q: Is there strong wind in the thin atmosphere that remains?
C: Yes.

Q: Are there beings of higher, less dense dimensions on Mars?
C: Yes.

Q: Are they like extraterrestrial visitors, in other words, similar in appearance?
C: No, they exist in a higher dimension and can briefly, as they choose, return to a more dense
physical state. This is not common, we must say.

Q: I have read they are concerned with human visits, exploration and effects.
C: Yes, they have observed human damage and destruction. There is concern such behavior could be
repeated. You do not have the technology to visit and exploit Mars but it is close. Economic challenges
are seen by Martian beings to reduce the risk yet they are aware of its proximity.

Q: What would be done by humans?
C: You would soon discover massive stores of valuable material and attempt to mine it for return to
Earth. The challenge is fall in value by abundance; we suggest the value of aluminum on Earth considered
as rare and precious as gold not so long ago. The required effort and investment would cause value thus
cost to plummet from perceived profitability and no more effort would be directed, at least to the material
taken. Other materials would be. Understand the ability to traverse the distance is now dependent on
gravity of the two planets; soon you would utilize small nuclear reactors and cross much faster. You
would launch many component parts of a large bulk vessel into your orbit, assemble them and depart for
Mars. Upon return the compartment parts would be separated and returned to Earth's surface.

Q: What materials exist on Mars we would want?
C: Molybdenum, copper, uranium and cobalt.

Q: Precious metals such as platinum, gold and silver?
C: Yes, these are present in smaller amounts yet sufficient to remove the view of scarcity and thus
preciousness humans give them. The absence of water, seas and the heating and cooling cycle have cause
many to become concentrated, their locations indicated by the vast frozen water and carbon dioxide of the
subsurface. These would be identified quickly and damage you might incur for extraction.

Q: Like strip mining?
C: We suggest the effort is too high; you would employ explosives. Gravity would cause detonated
material to fall to the surface immediately for quick identification and processing. There would be
discovered compounds and alloys unknown on Earth and these would also be sought. The surface scars
would remain. Your open pit mines are an example yet neat and clean by comparison to Mars mining
methods humans might employ.

Q: Is this ever going to happen?
C: No, it is not likely. Its possibility, however remote, nevertheless concerns the beings of Mars. They
do not want or need a disturbance to the planet.

Q: Do the large volcanoes and magma deposits contain many of these things?
C: Yes and you would seek to alter the shapes of these features in search of minerals.

Q: Is this one reason extraterrestrial visitors hold technology back from humans?
C: Yes, just one reason of lesser consideration.

Q: Esteemed Committee, thank you.
C: A pleasure to visit, do come back and be well always.

Comments
M&M 05/08/2013 3:23pm

Love this information. Hopefully we can learn more about "the bigger picture" and what the Universe around us truly
is about.

MoFoKai 05/08/2013 9:39pm

Intriguing article. Could we ask the committee on certain questions regarding what shape or form did these civilization
took hold when Mars was a lively sustainable planet? Was it a civilization depicted in the 2012 movie, '' John Carter ''
? A humanoid civilization?

Robert 06/08/2013 5:32pm

Hi Patrick,
Jesus and Saul on johnsmallman.com keep saying that humanity
will soon awaken and that we will be shocked and delighted when the
Illusion disintegrates and we see the true nature of Reality.
I was just wondering if The Committee knows if this has happened
yet with any human now living on earth and when in earth time
this expected to happen with Joe Average beyond "Soon". Thanks, Robert. :D

Patrick 06/08/2013 8:44pm

It's happened to me so it has to have happened to many others, and The Committee says yes, that's very true.
They say no average Jane or Joe exists, although it is easy to see this on Earth.
It is happening now, they say, the shift proceeds as we read this. How much time for each "stage" depends HIGHLY
on the individual and his / her perception.

Mara 06/08/2013 8:44pm

I am so moved by all of this information. It rings true for me in so many ways. Thank you for this.

Sarah 07/08/2013 6:45am

Hello Patrick!
Great information, thank you!
Now, on different matter, which has intrigued me a lot.

I just wanted to hear The Committes opinion on this phenomenon of Cattle Mutilations. Why do these animals end up
the way they do?
Drained of blood and missing organs that seem to be removed with surgical precision with the carcass often
appearing to be cauterized?
I also find it odd that all the events of this type that happen all over the globe have similar or replicate symptoms such
as Carrion eaters such as vultures and hawks will not go near the carcass which is strange since vultures and hawks
will eat almost anything dead ,especially a dead cow.

And also why animals, or dogs react with huge fear/barking when they sence or detect extraterrestrial or aliens?

Thanks for all you do!

Patrick 07/08/2013 11:10am

The very precisely mutilated cattle are often extraterrestrial visits; examination of body tissue and fluids for
effects of chemicals, heavier metals and food, especially genetically modified.

Dogs especially, and animals in general, detect the energy field of approaching beings better than humans.
They perceive seismic waves (earthquakes, approaching tsunamis, volcanic eruptions), storms and people.
Approaching aggressive animals with ill intent are also quickly detected by the energy footprint and aura.

Vultures are sensitive to the residual radioactive energy left behind by the instruments used, which are laser
based; the electricity is generated with a small nuclear device, the heat from which creates sufficient steam
pressure to compress our atmospheric air; the compressed air is released to turn a generator and make
power for the laser. (This is an example of the technology extraterrestrials will not give us)
The vultures detect radiation, which is not much more than generated when x-rays are taken. We humans
know small, infrequent exposure isn't harmful but cumulative exposure is, so operators leave the room and
we wear lead filled aprons to reduce exposure. The birds know this instinctively.
Just as animals are inherently aware of atmospheric ionization (what leads to lightning) and take cover, they
also detect the radioactive isotopes and keep away.

Sarah 07/08/2013 1:15pm

Thank you. I am humbly honored you chose to respond.