Where is the Neutron?

Chadwick under investigation for 1932 Neutron mistake

By Professor Joe Nahhas 1979
joenahhas1958@gmail.com

My name is Joe Nahhas founder of real time physics

July 4th, 1973
Abstract: Where is the Neutron?
Numerical example: What you have is like this:
Assume you have 100 protons each ways 2 grams and total mass is 200.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Page 1
But you did not know that. You only know that you have 200
200 grams bulk
nuclear material
Grams of radioactive material and used the Geiger counter because
unless you count it you will never know how much protons you had
and you had no proof that you had 100 protons.
At the beginning you can only know the total mass of 200 grams. You
lose five protons in the counting process due to scattering and absorption and
you counted 95 protons two grams each and that means a loss of 10 grams. You
are saying and assuming is that you had 200 grams and now you have a 95
count. You had 200 grams now I have a count of 95 protons 2 grams each and
that amounts to 2 x 95 = 190 grams and an energy loss of 10 grams and 10
grams divided by 95 = 0.105 grams per proton mass loss
So each proton is 2 grams and a loss of energy of 0.105
Then there must be a Neutron that ways 2.105
Chadwick’s 1932 Neutron Mistake

Alfred Nobel Prize winners James Chadwick

Page 2
Instead of saying that there is 95 particles counted and 5 particles
absorbed or scattered or miscounted by Geiger counter and (95 + 5) x
2 = 200. Chadwick said there were 100 times 2 and now there is 95 x
2 = 190 and 10/95 = 0.105 and 2 + 0.105 = 2.105

There is not one single proof that Geiger counter can have an exact
count of the protons and Chadwick’s experiment is not an exact
experiment that can be accepted as truth because the only truth is
the evidence suggest that some protons have been absorbed by the
Paraffin wax that changes color into dark carbon color and protons
are scattered and absorbed and prevented from going into the cloud
chamber to be counted. Chadwick experiment is not only wrong
conclusions but silly experiment to say the least

Proof: An Alpha α particle bombarded Beryllium Be.

Chadwick’s arguments is
Or α (Polonium) -------------> Be ---------------------> N 0 m p

N 0 m n ---------- N 0 m p + N 0 m p t/T p
Then m n = m p [1 + t/T n]; T n = Neutron life time; t = time
These particles go through diffraction and then through Paraffin which
is a Wax with high thermo absorption that suck these high speed
particles and becomes very dark carbon. In nuke labs that wax is
changed regularly when performing this waxed experiment.

This is the experiment Chadwick did and got a Nobel Prize from Nobel Prize
institution that promoted silly ideas of “Modern” confusions of physics

Page 3
Let No = number of protons

And mp = mass of a single proton

No mp is the total mass of the protons. The number No mp (t/T) is the

number of protons that suffered scatter and absorption and
approximated as decay and the new number of protons is:
N mp = No mp [1 – t/T] decay to count the new number
= No mp - No mp t/ T

T is the life time of the radioactive sample.

So, N = No - No t / T = No [1 - t/T] the number of particles counted
Or we lose No t/T particles every t seconds

What Chadwick did or his mistake is:

There is no Loss of particles but loss of mass when
there was loss of mass due to loss of particles.

Loss of mass in each particle mp t/ T in t time

This mass of particle is m n = Proposed Neutron
And m = m p

Instead of using N / N 0 = [1 - t/T]

To find the particles lost

Chadwick used m p =m n [1 - t/T]

To find lost mass

And m n =m p / [1 - t/T] = m p (1 + t/T)

And (m n - m p)/t = m p /T = 1836.12/726.2390 = 2.528258604 m e/second

With 1/T = 1/ 726.2390 seconds or little over 1/12 minutes 1979 data

And m p = 1836.12 m e
And said there must be a Neutron equal to the mass of the proton plus
additional mass due to loss of mass at (t/T) m p rate

Or mass of Neutron m n =m p / [1 - t/T] = 1838.65 m e ; t = 1

Page 4
Conclusion:

Average decay per proton m p / T = 2.528258604 m (e) lost mass due

to decay.

When added to m p that is m p +m p /T ≠ m n = 1838.6511 m e

And ∑1838.65 m e =∑ 1836.12 m e + ∑ 2.53 m e

Initial number of protons = Geiger counted protons + scattered protons

The rate of losing 2.528258604 m e per second added to m p = 1836.12

To add up to m n = 1838.65

The assumption that there is a neutron inside the nucleus to justify

mass loss in a decay experiment as Chadwick did is not only wrong but
silly to say the least and Chadwick never had a proof of the existence
of the “Neutron” and Alfred Nobel physics is wrong and Alfred Nobel
physicists opinion is silly.

All rights reserved

Page 5