Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
76 pages
8/22/2014 6:31:06 PM
1/29/2014 5:19:09 PM
Founded in 1927
TECHNICAL PAPERS
11
20
35
46
64
PUBLISHING / EDITORIAL /
ADVERTISEMENT &
CIRCULATION OFFICE
The Indian Concrete Journal
ACC Limited
L.B. Shastri Road,
Near Teen Haath Naka
Next to Eternity Mall
Thane (West) 400 604,
Maharashtra, INDIA.
Tel: 00-91-22-33027646
Website: www.icjonline.com
E-mail: info@icjonline.com
icj@acclimited.com
FEATURES
04
EDITORIAL
06
30
51
8/23/2014 10:24:55 AM
EDITORIAL
This month, ICJ has stepped into the 88th year and in itself
has created a history! The standing of ICJ is due to the
contributions of our authors, reviewers and readers over these
decades many of whom are with us for so many years! You
are witness to how ICJ has transformed and has stood the
test of time or rather, knowledge? We look forward to your
Best Regards,
Ashish Patil
AKC (Nalasopara)
September 24- 25, 2014: Workshop on Concrete
Mix Design
Contact
Ambuja Knowledge Centre, Mumbai
e: foundations.mumbai@ambujacement.com
w: www.foundationsakc.com
Contact:
Deep Foundations Institute of India
e: dfi-india2014@dfi.org
w: www.dfi-india2014.org
AKC (Andheri)
September 18-29, 2014: Workshop on Concrete
Mix Design
AKC (Belapur)
September 26, 2014: Acceleration & Retardation
of Cement Hydration in Concrete (Speaker: Dr.
Contact:
FIDIC Construction Workshop 2014
e: conferences-india@ubm.com
w: www.fidicindia.com
Contact:
Sustainable Habitat and integrated cities
e: contact@municipalika.com
w: www.municipalika.com
bC India 2014
Contact:
Concrete Show India 2015
e: csi-india@ubmindia.co.in
w: www.concreteshowindia.com
PROTECT2015
The Fifth International Workshop on Performance,
Protection & Strengthening of Structures under Extreme
Loading - PROTECT2015 will be held during June 28-30,
Benefits
Performance of Structures
Strengthening of Structures under Extreme Loading
Performance of Materials
Structural Management and Protection
Contact
PROTECT2015
e: protect2015-help@egr.msu.edu
w: www.egr.msu.edu/protect2015
10
TECHNICAL PAPER
The present study explores the influence of zirconium dioxide as refractory material in blended cements. Zirconium
dioxide has been replaced by 2% and 4% by mass in fly ash blended cements. Mortar cube specimens were prepared
and exposed to different level of temperature up to 800oC for 2 hours and 4 hours, after 28 days curing. The specimens
were tested for compressive strength after air cooling and were found to retain compressive strength. Microstructural
studies were carried out through X-ray diffraction and SEM analysis. It was found that Gismondine and Afwillite formed
at higher temperatures had influence on cement mortar.
Keywords : Cement; elevated temperatures; fly ash; zirconium dioxide; X-ray diffraction; SEM; thermal conductivity.
INTRODUCTION
There has been significant increase in the production
of blended cement since the mid- nineties due to the
increasing demand of sustainability in the construction
sector. A number of researches have been carried out using
blended cement because of the advantages of mechanical
properties and durability provided over normal Portland
cement. Replacement of cement by various percentages
of silica fume, fly ash, metakoalin and G.G.B.F.S. has
yielded improved mechanical properties, decreasing the
rate of hydration, decreasing the permeability of concrete
[1 - 8]. Most of the researches are towards the effect of
mineral addition in terms of the strength of mixes and
durability benefit. Few reports on the study of hydration
kinetics oxides of chromium, titanium on tricalcium
silicate paste are reported and observed to have higher
The Indian Concrete Journal, September 2014, Vol. 88, Issue 9, pp. 11-19
11
TECHNICAL PAPER
elevated temperatures result in considerable physical
deterioration included spalling, cracking etc. and damage
to structures. In general, at nearly 100oC the physisorbed
moisture (free water) begins to evaporate. Though
elasticity is reduced by about 10%-20%, the compressive
strength remains unchanged. As the temperature exceeds
300oC, the hydration water of silicate is released and causes
the paste to contract. However, in concrete, the aggregate
depending on their type it may expand. The temperature
range of 400o-500oC, considerable loss in the compressive
strength occurs. Most of the compressive strength before
heating may be lost from 600o-800oC. It is because the
calcium hydroxide and other cement hydration products
begin to dehydrate, which contributes to the deterioration
of concrete structure. Above 900oC, calcium carbonate
decompose by the loss of carbon-di-oxide along with
loss of free or bound water. Under exposure to high
temperature, a change in pore structure like increase
in concrete permeability and incompatibility between
the aggregate and cement paste worsen the durability
characteristics [15, 16, 17]. Compared with compressive
strength, tensile splitting strength suffers a more severe
loss under identical temperature, as the latter is more
sensitive to thermally induced cracking [18].
Fly ash blended Portland cement pastes have performed
better at these temperatures than Portland cement alone
since the fly ash reduced the amount of Ca(OH)2 in the
binder following hydration . Inert materials like quartz,
calcite, TiO2, alumina, ZrO2 enhance the cement hydration
and thus improve the thermal resistance [19. 20, 21, 11].
When the amount of fly ash in cement clinker is increase
from 15% to 35% the compressive strength of the mortar
decreased. When the replacement was 25% the mortar
12
Material Properties
CM
CM20FA
CM20FAZrO2
2%
4%
1.
Specific Gravity
3.4
3.20
3.12
3.08
2.
Consistency (%)
33
28
30
30.5
3.
88
80
87
76
4.
190
165
165
170
5.
Compressive strength
at 28 D
47.65
48.05
53.02
51.2
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 2. Chemical properties of fly ash used
Sl.
No.
Test conducted
Obtained
results
Requirements
as per
IS 3812 :2003 [22]
Part 1
1.
Specific Gravity
2.0
----
2.
298
320
3.
Soundness, by autoclave
expansion of contraction
in %, (maximum)
0.035
0.8
4.
Particle retained on 45
micron IS sieve (wet
sieving) in % maximum.
38.5
34
CM20FA 2% zro 2
CM20FA
CM20FA 4% zro 2
CM20FA
CM0FA2%ZrO2
CM20FA2%ZrO2
CM0FA4%ZrO2
CM20FA4%ZrO2
% Residual strength
70
60
50
40
30
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
20
10
0
CM
160
80
Compressive strength
CM
0
room
temp
100
200
400
600
800
RT
100
200
400
600
800
Temperature, C
Temperature, C
13
TECHNICAL PAPER
CM20FA 2% zro 2
CM20FA
CM20FA 4% zro 2
compressive strength
room
temp
120
100
RT
200
400
600
200
400
600
800
800
I rel
1000
950
900
850
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Experimental pattern
Calculated pattern ( exp. peaks ) (Rp=15.2 %)
[96-901-2601] 02 Si Quartz
[96-901-2725] Si Silicon
1000
950
900
850
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Experimental pattern
Calculated pattern ( exp. peaks ) (Rp=20.9%)
[96-100-8703] Cu0.375 Nd1.625 06.625 Ru2 Neodymium
copper ruthenium oxide (1.63/37/2/6.63)
Cu-Ka1 ( 1.540598A)
2theta
25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00
Cu-Ka1 ( 1.540598A)
Figure 5. CM Unheated
14
100
Temperature
100
Temperature
I rel
CM0FA2%ZrO2
CM
% Residual strength
CM
2theta
Figure 6. CM 800 C
TECHNICAL PAPER
20
20
1000
950
900
850
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
room temp Zr 2%
Calcite, ettringite
40
Ettringite, hillebrandite
Counts
60
80
I rel
30.00
50.00
40.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
Cu-Ka1 ( 1.540598A)
30
40
50
60
70
90.00
2theta
Position, 2 theata
[96-901-6707] C Ca O3 Calcite
I rel
[96-900-6838] Ca H2 O2 Portiandite
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 55.00 60.00 65.00 70.00 75.00 80.00
Cu-Ka1 ( 1.540598A)
2theta
15
50
Position, 2Theata
60
Gismondine
20
100
70
30
40
Gismondine
40
4Z84
Gismondine
30
Gismondine
20
200
Counts
500
0
Etteingite
1000
300
Calcite, syn
Counts
1500
400
4Z14
Calcite, syn
2000
TECHNICAL PAPER
50
60
70
Position, 2Theata
Figure 12b. CM 30 C
16
TECHNICAL PAPER
mass ash at room temperature [35]. Gismondine is
responsible for the long term strength gain a these phases
are known to be refractory in nature. These phases are
present even after exposure to elevated temperature for
both the durations. The thermal endurance of zirconium
dioxide, Gismondine and an Afwillite allow these mixes
to have a better residual strength at normal temperature
and at higher temperatures. The addition of zirconium
dioxide aids in the formation of gismondine.
Micro structural analysis of Mixes at different
temperature
CM
CM0FA 2% zro 2
CM20FA
CM20FA 2% zro 2
CM20FA
CM0FA 4% zro 2
CM0FA 2% zro 2
CM20FA 4% zro 2
0.6
0.4
0.2
100
CM0FA 4% zro 2
RT
CM
0.8
Thermal conductivity
200
400
600
800
Temperature
CM20FA 2% zro 2
Thermal conductivity
Thermal conductivity
RT
100
200
400
600
800
Temperature
17
TECHNICAL PAPER
to 100oC for 2 hours. The decrease in thermal conductivity
could be due to loss of water at this temperature. For
mortars CM2OFA2%ZRO2 and CM2OFA4%ZRO2 the thermal
conductivity decreased at 100oC but their values were
higher than that of the mix CM. This could be due to
lesser loss of pore water, at this temperature in these
mixes. Thus between 100oC and 200o C, there is decrease
in thermal conductivity for all the mixes. Between 200oC
and 400oC the thermal conductivity increases slightly due
to the removal of water from the hydrated compounds.
The thermal conductivity of cement mortar is expected
to decrease at temperature between 600o C and 800o C.
This is due to decrease in crystallinity with increase in
temperature. The thermal conductivity decreases when
the heating temperature increases. This is due to the
deterioration of the micro structure. The voids limit the
heat transfer. [37]. This also could be due to filled action of
ZrO2. [38] The decrease thermal conductivity of the mixes
CM20FA2%ZRO2 and CM2OFA4%ZRO2 is lower than the mix
CM. This means that the thermal endurance of zirconium
dioxide and the presence of thermally stable gismondine
in the cement mortar has prevented the disintegration of
C-S-H gel formed. This accounts for the better residual
strength of these mortars at the temperature 600oC.
CONCLUSIONS
1. The replacement of portland cement by 20% fly
ash improves the compressive strength of mortars
at elevated temperatures of 100oC, 200oC, 400oC,
600oC, 800oC by about 15%.
2. The addition of 2% and 4% zirconium dioxide
along with 20% fly ash helps in retaining the
compressive strength upto 70% at all elevated
temperatures and durations of exposure.
3. The addition of 2% and 4% zirconium dioxide
facilitates the formation of gismodine in the fly
ash blended cement mortar
4. The increase in thermal endurance could be
because of formation of Gismondine and
Afwillite which is refractory in nature and are
not decompose by elevated temperatures aids in
retaining the compressive strength.
18
References
1. Antiohos, S.K., Papadakis, V.G. Chaniotakis E., Improving the
performance of ternary blended cements by different types of fly
ashes, Cement Concrete Research, 2007, Vol. 37, pp. 877-885.
2. Morsy, M.S. and Rashad A.M., Effect of elevated temperature on
physio mechanical properties of metakaolin blended cement mortar,
Structural Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 1-10, 2009.
3. Malhotra, V.M. and Mehta, P.K., High performance, high volume fly
ash concrete, 2nded. Ottawa, ONT, supplementary cementing materials
for sustainable development, 2005.
4. Mehta, P.K., Advancement in concrete technology, Journal Concrete
International, 1999, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 69-76.
5. Aydin, S. and Baradan, B., Effect of pumice and fly ash incorporation
on high temperature resistance of cement based mortars. Cement
Concrete Research, 2007, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 988-995.
6. Serdr Aydin, Development of a high temperature resistant mortar
by using slag and pumice. Fire Safety Journal, 2008, Vol. 43, pp. 610617.
7. Wang, H.Y., The effects of elevated temperature on cement paste
containing GGBFS, Cement Concrete Composition, 2008.
8. Buil, M. Paillere, A.M. and Roussel, B., High strength mortar
containing condensed silica fume, Cement Concrete Research, 1984,
Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 693-704.
9. N.K. Katyal, R Prakash,, Influence of titania on the formation of
tricalcium silicate, Cement Concrete Research, 1999, Vol. 29, pp. 355359.
10. N.K. Katyal, R Prakash, Effect of Cr2O3 on the formation of C3S in
3CaO:1SiO2: x Cr2O3 system, Cement Concrete Research, 2000, Vol. 30,
pp. 1361-1365.
11. Zivica V., Hardening ad properties of cement based materials
incorporating heavy metal oxides, Building Materials Science, 1997,
Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 677-688.
12. G. Kakali, S. Tsivilis, Hydration of ordinary portland cements made
from raw mixes containing transition element oxides, Cement Concrete
Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 335-340
13. P.K. Mehta, Advancements in concrete technology, Concrete
International, 1999, Vol. 96, No. 4, pp. 69-76.
14. The Effect of Elevated Temperature on Concrete Materials and
Structures - A Literature Review Prepared by D.J. Naus; pp. 1.
15. F.S. Rostasy, Changes in pore structure of cement mortars due to
temperatures. Cement Concrete Research, 1980, Vol. 10, pp. 157-164.
16. J. Piasta, Z. Sawicz, Changes in the structure of hardened cement
paste due to high temperature, Material Structure, 1984 Vol. 17, pp.
291-296.
17. Wei-Ming Lin, T.D. Lin, and L.J. Powers, Couche. Microstructure of
fire damaged structure, ACI Materials Journal, 1996, pp. 199-205.
18. Wei-Tun Chang, Chen-Then Wang, Chin-Wang Huang, Concrete
at temperatures above 1000C, Fire Safety Journal, 1994, Vol. 23, pp.
223-243.
19. Philippe lawrence, mineral admixtures in mortars, Effect of inert
materials on short term hydration Cement Concrete Research, 2003,
Vol. 33, 1939-1947.
20. Hosam. El_Din H. Seleem, Alaa M. Rashad, Effect of elevated
temperature on physico-mechanical properties of blended cement
concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 2011, Vol. 25, pp.
1009-1017.
21. Jiang, S.P. Mutin, J.C. Nonat, A. Filler cement, effect of fillers on the
kinetics of cement hydration, Proceedings of 3rd Beijing International
Symposium on cement and concrete III China Building Materials academy
Beijing, 1993, pp. 132-137.
22. Ozlem Celik, Erdem Damic, Characterization of fly ash and its effect
on the compressive strength of portland cement, IJEMS, Oct. 2008,
Vol. 15, pp. 433-440.
23. Rajesh Chandra, Mechanical and three body abrasive wear behavior
of nano flyash / zro2 filled polyimide composites, International Journal
of Science Research, 2013, Vol. 1, Issue 4, pp. 196-202.
TECHNICAL PAPER
24. Luis F. Vilches, Constantino Fernndez-Pereira, Joaqun Olivares del Valle,
Jos Vale, Recycling potential of coal fly ash and titanium waste as new
fireproof products, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, Vol. 95, pp.
155161.
25. Ali Nazari, Shadi RiahiTiO2 Nanoparticles effects on physical, thermal and
mechanical properties of self compacting concrete with ground granulated
blast furnace slag as binder Energy and Buildings, 2011, Vol. 43, pp.
9951002.
26. Ali Nazari, Shadi Riahi, Shirin Riahi, Seyedeh Fatemeh Shamekhi and A.
Khademno, An investigation on the Strength and workability of cement based
concrete performance by using ZrO2 Nanoparticles, Journal of American
Science, 2010, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 29-32.
27. Ali Nazari, Shadi Riahi, Shirin Riahi, Seyedeh Fatemeh Shamekhi and A.
Khademno, Improvement the mechanical properties of the cementitious
composite by using TiO2 nanoparticles, Journal of American Science, 2010,
Vol. 6, No. 4, pp 98-101.
28. Ali Nazari, Shadi Riahi, Shirin Riahi, Seyedeh Fatemeh Shamekhi and
A. Khademno, Mechanical properties of cement mortar with Al2O 3
nanoparticles, Journal of American Science, 2010, Vol. 6(4), pp 94-97.
29. Ali Nazari et al; ZrO2 nanoparticles effect on split tensile strength
of self compacting cement, Materials Research, 2010, Vol. 13, No. 4,
pp. 485-495.
30. Hui. Li, Hui gand Xiao, Jie Yuan, Microstructure of cement mortar
with nano particles, Composites Part B., 2004, Vol. 35, pp. 185-189.
31. Peng, G.F. Huang Z.S., Change in microstructure of hardened cement
paste subjected to elevated temperatures, Construction and Building
Materials, 2008, Vol. 22, pp. 593599.
Uma Suresh is research scholar at SRM university, Chennai. She is presently working as Head of
Department, Chemistry at V.V.S.G.J.PU College. Mysore. Her field of interest is cement chemistry at
elevated temperature.
Dr. R. Jeyalakshmi is a Professor in the Department of Chemistry, Faculty of E&T, SRM University.
Her fields of interest include material technology, reaction engineering, environmental chemistry,
nanotechnology and corrosion engineering.
Dr. N. Suresh is Professor & Director, Building Fire Research Centre, The National Institute of Engineering,
Mysore. His fields of interest are studies on the behaviour of concrete at elevated temperatures. He is
member of BIS CED2 & CED22.
19
TECHNICAL PAPER
This paper investigates the compressive strength development of binary and ternary cement concretes containing
Portland cement, fly ash and metakaolin at various ages and water/cement ratios. The material costs and embodied
carbon dioxide (e-CO2) levels of these concretes at the strength of 45 N/mm2 are also presented. The results suggest
that metakaolin improves compressive strength at both early and later ages, while fly ash contributes to strength
development at later ages. The concretes made with blended cements have lower e-CO2 levels than those made with
Portland cement. The cost data suggest that at 45 N/mm2 strength, economic blended cement concretes are possible
when the level of metakaolin blending is kept at 5%.
Keywords: Cement combination; cement combination concrete; compressive strength; concrete construction.
Introduction
Metakaolin is a highly reactive non-crystalline pozzolanic
material. Calcination of Kaolinite produces it in two
colours; off-white and white. Its particles are coarser
than those of silica fume but finer than those of Portland
cement [1]. The specific gravity and specific surface of
metakaolin are 2.6 and 15000 m2/kg respectively [1]. Due
to its fineness, metakaolin forms more nucleation sites
to accelerate cement hydration and enhance strength
development [2-5]. However, being an expensive product,
it is used in small quantities of (about 5-15%) as a cement
replacement material [1]. In addition, its high specific
surface and chemical reactivity result in workability
challenges characterized by a high water demand [6,7].
The Indian Concrete Journal, September 2014, Vol. 88, Issue 9, pp. 20-29.
20
TECHNICAL PAPER
ash would also ensure the availability of quality fly ash
for future use in concrete [17].
From these descriptions it would appear that a ternary
blend of Portland cement, fly ash and metakaolin would
offer significant advantage over a binary blend of
Portland cement with fly ash or metakaolin. When these
two pozzolanas are blended with Portland cement, their
combination would complement each other to improve
the performance of concrete [9]. While metakaolin would
support early age strength development, fly ash would
contribute to later age strength development [18]. The
ternary combination would also result in reducing the
dosage of water or water reducing admixtures [19]. Hence,
metakaolin could serve as an alternative to silica fume in
some mixes. Cement and concrete standards such as BS
EN 197- 1, BS EN 206- 1 and BS 8500 support the use of
ternary blended cements. Also, the construction industry
now uses several types of blended cements [20].
Cements
a)
PC
FA
MK
395
388
b)
2588
1.9
6.1
0.9
3.17
2.26
2.51
11.0
64.5
3.2
0.0
SiO2
20.0
52.0
57.6
Al2O3
4.6
26.0
38.9
Fe2O3
3.7
10.1
0.6
MgO
2.5
1.5
0.3
MnO
0.1
0.1
0.0
TiO2
0.3
1.5
0.0
K 2O
0.7
2.8
2.4
Na2O
0.3
1.2
0.1
P2O5
0.1
0.5
0.1
Cl
0.1
0.0
0.0
SO3
3.1
1.1
0.0
21
TECHNICAL PAPER
ether based superplasticiser conforming to EN 934-2 was
used.
The mix proportion was carried out in accordance with
the BRE Design Guide [22]. The yield corrected mix
proportions, to the nearest 5 kg/m3, using a free water
content of 165 kg/m3 to avoid an excessively sticky mix
for the saturated surface dry (SSD) aggregates used are
presented in Table 3 for the cement combinations. The
cement combinations consist of the binary blends of fly
ash and metakaolin with Portland cement and ternary
blends prepared by introducing metakaolin to partreplace the fly ash in the binary blends of fly ash and
Portland cement.
Concrete preparation followed BS EN 12390- 2. The
specimens, after casting, were cured in the mould under
a damp hessian cloth covered with a polythene sheet for
about 24 hours. Subsequently, they were demoulded
and cured in water tank maintained at about 20oC until
testing. The compressive strength test was carried out
in accordance with BS EN 12390- 3. Two 100 mm cubes,
at the test ages, were loaded to failure using the Avery
Denison cube crushing machine (Figure 1) with a base
load of 10kN and a loading rate of 7.0 kN/m2.
Fine aggregates #
0 - 4 mm
Coarse aggregates
#
4 - 10
mm
10 - 20
mm
Shape, visual
Varied
Varied
Rough
Smooth
Particle density *
2.6
2.6
2.6
Water absorption, % **
1.0
1.7
1.2
55.0
22
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 3. Mix proportions of concrete at a free water content of 165 kg/m3
Mix combination
w/c
Cements
100%PC
80%PC+20%FA
80%PC+15%FA+5%MK
65%PC+35%FA
65%PC+30%FA+5%MK
65%PC+25%FA+10%MK
45%PC+55%FA
45%PC+45%FA+10%MK
45%PC+40%FA+15%MK
95%PC+5%MK
90%PC+10%MK
85%PC+15%MK
Aggregates
SP #,
%
CEM I
FA
MK
0 - 4 mm
4 - 10
mm
10 - 20
mm
0.35
475
650
375
755
0.41
0.50
330
740
385
770
0.33
0.65
255
820
380
765
0.25
0.35
375
95
640
370
745
0.37
0.50
260
65
735
385
765
0.30
0.65
200
50
815
375
760
0.23
0.35
375
70
25
640
370
745
0.43
0.50
265
50
15
735
385
765
0.35
0.65
200
40
15
820
375
760
0.26
0.35
305
165
635
365
740
0.33
0.50
210
115
730
380
760
0.27
0.65
165
90
815
375
755
0.20
0.35
305
140
25
635
365
740
0.40
0.50
210
100
15
730
380
760
0.35
0.65
165
75
15
815
375
755
0.27
0.35
305
115
45
635
365
740
0.45
0.50
210
80
35
730
380
760
0.39
0.65
165
65
25
815
375
755
0.31
0.35
205
255
625
360
730
0.31
0.50
145
180
725
375
755
0.26
0.65
110
135
810
370
750
0.19
0.35
210
210
45
630
365
730
0.38
0.50
145
145
30
725
380
755
0.34
0.65
115
115
25
810
375
750
0.27
0.35
210
185
70
630
365
730
0.41
0.50
145
130
50
725
380
755
0.37
0.65
115
100
40
810
375
750
0.28
0.35
450
25
645
375
750
0.43
0.50
315
15
740
385
770
0.35
0.65
240
15
820
380
760
0.26
0.35
425
45
645
375
750
0.47
0.50
295
35
740
385
770
0.39
0.65
230
25
820
380
760
0.29
0.35
400
70
645
370
750
0.51
0.50
280
50
740
385
770
0.43
0.65
215
40
820
380
760
0.33
# % Superplasticiser (SP) required for consistence class 2 (BS EN 206-1) is related to the total cement content.
23
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 4. Cube compressive strengths of cement combination concretes and their strength factors with respect to Portland
cement at different ages
Mix combination
100%PC
80%PC+20%FA
80%PC+15%FA
+5%MK
65%PC+35%FA
65%PC+30%FA
+5%MK
65%PC+25%FA
+10%MK
45%PC+55%FA
45%PC+45%FA
+10%MK
45%PC+40%FA
+15%MK
95%PC+5%MK
90%PC+10%MK
85%PC+15%MK
w/c
3d
7d
28d
90d
180d
3d
7d
28d
90d
180d
0.35
54.0
68.0
80.0
90.0
96.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.50
32.0
43.5
54.0
61.0
64.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.65
21.0
28.0
38.5
43.0
45.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.35
46.0
58.0
72.0
83.0
92.0
85
85
90
92
96
0.50
25.5
35.0
46.5
55.0
59.0
79
80
86
90
92
0.65
12.0
19.0
30.0
37.0
41.0
57
68
78
86
91
0.35
48.0
62.0
82.0
91.0
95.0
89
91
102
101
99
0.50
27.0
39.0
53.0
60.0
63.0
84
89
98
98
98
0.65
13.5
22.0
34.0
39.0
42.0
64
78
88
90
93
0.35
34.0
42.0
60.0
72.0
80.0
63
61
75
80
83
0.50
18.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
50.0
56
57
65
74
78
0.65
8.0
11.0
20.0
28.0
34.0
38
39
52
65
75
0.35
37.0
50.0
64.0
73.0
80.0
68
73
80
81
83
0.50
19.0
28.0
42.0
49.0
52.0
59
64
78
80
81
0.65
10.0
15.0
24.0
30.0
34.0
47
53
62
70
75
0.35
38.0
52.0
68.0
80.0
87.0
70
76
85
89
90
0.50
20.0
30.0
43.0
50.0
54.0
62
69
79
82
84
0.65
10.5
16.0
25.0
31.0
36.0
50
57
65
72
80
0.35
20.0
26.0
42.0
55.0
62.0
37
38
52
61
64
0.50
11.0
15.5
24.0
34.0
40.0
34
35
44
55
62
0.65
5.0
6.0
12.0
20.0
26.0
24
21
31
46
58
0.35
20.0
29.0
47.0
58.0
64.0
37
42
59
64
66
0.50
12.0
19.0
32.5
43.0
48.0
37
43
60
70
75
0.65
6.0
8.5
18.5
28.0
32.0
28
30
48
65
71
0.35
20.0
30.0
50.0
59.0
65.5
37
44
62
65
68
0.50
12.0
19.5
33.0
44.0
49.5
37
45
61
72
77
0.65
6.0
9.0
20.0
31.0
36.0
28
32
52
72
80
0.35
54.0
68.0
80.0
86.0
90.0
100
100
100
95
94
0.50
32.0
44.0
56.0
63.0
66.0
100
101
103
103
103
0.65
19.0
26.0
37.0
41.0
42.0
90
93
96
95
93
0.35
54.0
68.0
78.0
84.0
87.0
100
100
97
93
90
0.50
30.0
43.0
54.5
63.0
66.0
93
99
101
103
103
0.65
17.0
27.0
38.0
42.0
43.0
81
96
98
97
95
0.35
46.0
64.0
76.0
84.0
87.0
85
94
95
93
90
0.50
28.0
42.0
54.0
63.0
66.0
87
96
100
103
103
0.65
17.0
26.0
41.0
44.0
46.0
81
93
106
102
102
24
Strength factors, % #
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 5. Cube compressive strengths of cement combination concretes and their strength factors (with respect to their
respective fly ash binary cement) at different ages
Mix combination
80%PC+20%FA
80%PC+15%FA
+5%MK
65%PC+35%FA
65%PC+30%FA
+5%MK
65%PC+25%FA
+10%MK
45%PC+55%FA
45%PC+45%FA
+10%MK
45%PC+40%FA
+15%MK
w/c
Strength factors, % #
3d
7d
28d
90d
180d
3d
7d
28d
90d
180d
0.35
46.0
58.0
72.0
83.0
92.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.50
25.5
35.0
46.5
55.0
59.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.65
12.0
19.0
30.0
37.0
41.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.35
48.0
62.0
82.0
91.0
95.0
104
107
114
109
103
0.50
27.0
39.0
53.0
60.0
63.0
106
111
114
109
107
0.65
13.5
22.0
34.0
39.0
42.0
112
116
113
105
102
0.35
34.0
42.0
60.0
72.0
80.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.50
18.0
25.0
35.0
45.0
50.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.65
8.0
11.0
20.0
28.0
34.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.35
37.0
50.0
64.0
73.0
80.0
109
119
106
101
100
0.50
19.0
28.0
42.0
49.0
52.0
105
112
120
109
104
0.65
10.0
15.0
24.0
30.0
34.0
125
136
120
107
100
0.35
38.0
52.0
68.0
80.0
87.0
112
124
113
111
109
0.50
20.0
30.0
43.0
50.0
54.0
111
120
123
111
108
0.65
10.5
16.0
25.0
31.0
36.0
131
145
125
110
106
0.35
20.0
26.0
42.0
55.0
62.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.50
11.0
15.5
24.0
34.0
40.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.65
5.0
6.0
12.0
20.0
26.0
100
100
100
100
100
0.35
20.0
29.0
47.0
58.0
64.0
100
111
112
105
103
0.50
12.0
19.0
32.5
43.0
48.0
109
122
135
126
120
0.65
6.0
8.5
18.5
28.0
32.0
120
141
154
140
123
0.35
20.0
30.0
50.0
59.0
65.5
100
115
119
107
105
0.50
12.0
19.5
33.0
44.0
49.5
109
126
137
129
124
0.65
6.0
9.0
20.0
31.0
36.0
120
150
166
155
138
# Strength ratios determined with respect to their respective fly ash binary cement concrete values at different ages
25
TECHNICAL PAPER
with higher dilution effect (i.e. lower content of Portland
cement and hence lower content of Ca(OH)2 released to
support pozzolanic reaction) improved progressively
up to 180 days shows that the non-improvement in the
strength factors of the 80%PC ternary cement concretes
would be due to the fact that the cement addition content
at 20% is not high enough to fully react with the Ca(OH)2
released from the hydration reaction of Portland cement
to support the pozzolanic reactions required to produce
a significant difference in their strengths beyond the age
of 28 days. These observations suggest that pozzolanic
reaction is a function of the availability of Ca(OH)2 and the
quantum of available cementitious materials in the blend.
Conversely, the strength factors of the 65% and 45% PC
concretes (Table 4) which continued to increase up to 180
days, suggests that the amount of cement additions were
high enough to support long-term pozzolanic reaction.
26
e-CO2 content of
material b),
kg/tonne
60.00 (6000)
930
Fly ash
20.00 (2000)
100.00 (10000)
300
0 - 4 mm aggregates
10.00 (1000)
4 - 10 mm aggregates
10.00 (1000)
10 - 20 mm aggregates
10.00 (1000)
Water
10.00 (1000)
0.3
1300.00 (130000)
0.72
Metakaolin
Admixture
(superplasticiser)
TECHNICAL PAPER
content. Metakaolin as binary cement component also
reduced the e-CO2 values of concrete with increasing
content but not as much as fly ash. Hence, while metakaolin
ternary cement concretes have slightly higher e-CO2
values than fly ash binary cement concretes, their e-CO2
values were lower than that of Portland cement concrete
at equal water/cement ratio. The material costs and e-CO2
contents of the cement combination concretes at the cube
compressive strength of 45 N/mm2 at 28 days (Table8)
obtained by interpolating the values in Tables 4, 5 and
7 confirm that this strength of the cement combination
concretes would be achieved at different costs and e-CO2
contents. The ranking of the concretes in terms of cost and
e-CO2 contents is also given in Table 8. The Table also
shows that while all the cement combination concretes are
more environmentally compatible than Portland cement
concrete, six out of the 11 cement combination concretes
are more economical than Portland cement concrete.
These are the fly ash binary cement concretes and the
5%MK binary and ternary cement concretes. Hence, with
proper selection, cement combination concretes could be
made more environmentally compatible and economic
than Portland cement concrete.
Conclusion
Metakaolin as a binary cement component contributed
to both early and later age strength development of
concrete. The compressive strengths of fly ash binary
cement concretes which were considerably lower than
that of Portland cement concrete at early ages improved
progressively with age to reduce the disparity between
their strengths and that of Portland cement at later ages.
At early ages, all the ternary cement concretes have
lower strength than Portland cement concrete and these
strengths increased progressively such that at 180 days
some of the mixes have slightly higher strengths than
Portland cement concrete. Also, the propensity for strength
development reduced with increasing fly ash content of
the ternary cement concrete. The reduction in the strength
factors of the ternary cement concretes, with respect to the
fly ash binary concrete, between 7 and 28 days onwards
shows that while metakaolin would support early age
strength development, fly ash would only contribute to
later age strength development. The comparison of the
strength factors of the ternary cement concretes with that
of Portland cement concrete shows that a total cement
Table 7. Material cost and embodied carbon dioxide (CO2) content of concrete
Material cost and embodied CO2 content of concrete #
Mix combination
w/c = 0.35
w/c = 0.50
w/c = 0.65
Cost/m3,
(Rs)*
e-CO2,
kg/m3
Cost/m3,
(Rs)*
e-CO2,
kg/m3
Cost/m3,
(Rs)*
e-CO2,
kg/m3
100%PC
50.48 (5048)
449
41.82 (4182)
315
37.43 (3743)
245
80%PC+20%FA
45.86 (4586)
356
38.67 (3867)
250
34.90 (3490)
194
80%PC+15%FA+5%MK
48.23 (4823)
364
40.40 (4040)
259
36.36 (3636)
199
65%PC+35%FA
42.67 (4267)
291
36.39 (3639)
203
33.46 (3346)
162
65%PC+30%FA+5%MK
45.09 (4509)
299
37.93 (3793)
208
34.90 (3490)
166
65%PC+25%FA+10%MK
46.87 (4687)
305
39.70 (3970)
214
35.83 (3583)
169
45%PC+55%FA
38.10 (3810)
199
33.55 (3355)
143
30.81 (3081)
111
45%PC+45%FA+10%MK
42.45 (4245)
217
36.21 (3621)
152
33.55 (3355)
123
45%PC+40%FA+15%MK
44.63 (4463)
224
38.06 (3806)
158
34.78 (3478)
127
95%PC+5%MK
51.51 (5151)
433
42.50 (4250)
305
38.01 (3801)
236
90%PC+10%MK
52.52 (5252)
416
43.47 (4347)
292
38.51 (3851)
229
85%PC+15%MK
53.42 (5342)
400
44.25 (4425)
283
39.24 (3924)
220
# cost and e-CO2 content calculated based on material content (Table 3) and rates (Table 6)
* 1 (British Pound) = Rs. 100 (Indian Rupee) in August 2014
27
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 8. Material cost and embodied CO2 content of concrete at the strength of 45 N/mm2
Mix combination
Material cost and embodied CO2 content of concrete at the strength of 45 N/mm2
w/c
Cost/m3,
(Rs)*
Rank
e-CO2,
kg/m3
Rank
100%PC
0.57
39.66 (3966)
274
12
80%PC+20%FA
0.51
38.31 (3831)
80%PC+15%FA+5%MK
0.55
38.63 (3863)
245
234
9
6
65%PC+35%FA
0.43
38.91 (3891)
65%PC+30%FA+5%MK
0.48
38.65 (3865)
239
217
7
4
65%PC+25%FA+10%MK
0.49
40.08 (4008)
219
45%PC+55%FA
0.33
38.85 (3885)
208
45%PC+45%FA+10%MK
0.37
41.41 (4141)
11
206
45%PC+40%FA+15%MK
0.39
42.56 (4256)
12
203
95%PC+5%MK
0.58
39.54 (3954)
261
11
90%PC+10%MK
0.58
40.31 (4031)
252
10
85%PC+15%MK
0.59
40.74 (4074)
10
239
28
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to the Department of Civil
Engineering, University of Dundee, Dundee, United
Kingdom for the facilities and guidance provided for this
research.
References
1. A d v a n c e d C e m e n t T e c h n o l o g i e s a v a i l a b l e a t h t t p : / /
advancedcementtechnologies.com
2. Mehta, P, K. and Aitcin P. C., Principles underlying production of
high-performance concrete, Cement, Concrete and Aggregates, 1990,
Vol. 12, pp. 70-78.
3. Wild S., Khatib J. M., Jones A., Relative strength pozzolanic activity
and cement hydration in superplasticised metakaolin concrete, Cement
and Concrete Research, 1996, Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1537-1544.
4. Bai J., Sabir B. B., Wild S. and Kinuthia J. M., Strength development
in concrete incorporating PFA and metakaolin, Magazine of Concrete
Research, 2000, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 153-162.
5. Poon C. S., Kou S. C. and Lam L., Compressive strength, chloride
diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and
silica fume concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 2006, Vol.
20, pp 858-865.
6. Bai J., Wild S., Sabir B. B. and Kinuthia J. M., Workability of concrete
incorporating pulverized fuel ash and metakaolin, Magazine of Concrete
Research, 1999, Vol. 51, No. 3, pp. 207-216.
TECHNICAL PAPER
7. Park C. K., Noh M. H. and Park T. H., Rheological properties of
cementitious materials containing mineral admixtures, Cement and
Concrete Research, 2005, Vol. 35, No. 5, pp 842-849.
8. Dhir R. K., McCarthy M. J. and Paine K. A., Use of fly ash to BS EN
450 in structural concrete, Technology Digest I, The Concrete Society,
London, 2002.
9. Thomas M. D. A., Shehata M. H., Shashiprakash S. G., Hopkins D.
S. and Cail K., Use of ternary cementitious systems containing silica
fume and fly ash in concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, 1999, Vol.
29, No. 8, pp. 1207-1214.
10. Concrete Society, The use of GGBS and PFA in concrete, Technical Report
No 40, The Concrete Society, London, 1991.
11. Mindess, S., Young, F. J. and Darwin, D., Concrete, 2nd Ed., PrenticeHall, 2003.
12. Helmuth, R., Fly ash in cement and concrete, Portland Cement
Association, Skokie, Illinois, 1987.
16. Antiohos S. K., Papadakis V. G., Chaniotakis E., Tsimas S., Improving
the performance of ternary blended cements by mixing different
types of fly ashes, Cement and Concrete Research, 2007, Vol. 37, No.
6, pp. 877-885.
17. Jones M. R., Sear L. K. A., McCarthy M. J. and Dhir R. K., Changes
in coal fired power station fly ash: Recent experiences and use
in concrete, paper presented at the Ash Technology Conference
organized by the UK Quality Ash Association, Birmingham,
2006, available at: www. ukqaa.org.uk/index_htm_files/
AshTechA01ChangesInCoalFiredPowerStationJonesEtA1.pdf
18. Bai J., Wild S. and Sabir B. B., Sorptivity and strength of air-cured
PC-PFA-MK concrete and the influence of binder composition on
carbonation depth, Cement and Concrete Research, 2002, Vol. 32, No.
11, pp. 1813-1821.
19. Bouzoubaa N., Bilodeau A., Sivasundaram v., Fournier B and Golden
D. M., Development of ternary blends for high performance concrete,
ACI Material Journal, 2004, Vol. 101, No. 1, pp. 19-29.
13. Hassan, K. E., Cabrera, J. G., Maliehe, R. S., The effect of mineral
admixtures on the properties of high-performance concrete, Cement
and Concrete Composites, 2000, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp 267-271.
15. Lam L., Wong Y. L., Poon C. S., Effect of fly ash and silica fume on
compressive and fracture behaviours of concrete, Cement and Concrete
Research, 1998, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 271-283.
Dr. Folagbade S. Olufemi holds a BSc (Hons.) in Building from University of Ife, Nigeria; an MSc in
Construction Technology, University of Lagos, Nigeria; an MSc in Structural Engineering from University
of Glasgow, United Kingdom (UK); PhD in Civil Engineering from University of Dundee, UK. He is a
Lecturer in the Department of Building, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. His areas of interest
are construction technology and materials (especially concrete) and structural mechanics and design.
Moray Newlands PhD holds a BEng Honours degree in Civil Engineering; an MSc in Concrete Technology,
Construction and Management, University of Dundee, UK; PhD from Concrete Technology Unit (CTU),
University of Dundee, UK. His PhD project developed a simulated natural carbonation performance test
which is now a CEN Technical Specification (CEN TS 12390-10). He is a lecturer within the Division since
2005. Previously, he was a Research Fellow and CPD/Consultancy Manager for the CTU. He is also currently
Secretary for CEN TC51/WG12/TG5 which is developing test methods for concrete performance.
29
POINT OF VIEW
Construction method
Precast pre-stressed multiple girders were cast at the
ground at available places and towed to the site and lifted.
The form work for deck slab fixed to precast girders and
slab cast in situ.
Foundations, piers/abutments were cast in situ along
with bearings and precast girders were launched. The
girders were 3 spans continuous; after launching girders
on individual spans, the continuity was given in the
girders through a cross girder and continuous slab.
30
Load test
It was decided to carry out detailed investigations, check
the design in particular non tensile steel and compare this
with similar girders, also to check tests results of concrete
cube (Figures 3 and 4). Beside this it was also decided to
POINT OF VIEW
28500
1000 1500
1500 1000
23500
Girder elevation
750
8000
1300
0f Girder
300
31
POINT OF VIEW
6000
1500*
Concrete blocks
Approximate weight 30T.
20mm Thk
Plate
Jack
Lean concrete
20mm Thk
Plate
Jack
Lean
concrete
Trestles
Dial guage
Longitudinal section
Dial guage
Cross section
POINT OF VIEW
ABOUT SHRINKAGE IN CONCRETE
Page 340 of the Book Concrete Technology- Theory and
Practice by M. S. Shetty gives various types of shrinkages.
Following important points are noteworthy:
33
POINT OF VIEW
subjected to drying condition. Most of it occurs in
28 days, but some continues thereafter.
The test has proved that the strength of concrete is not
reduced and which was the earlier fear.
ANCHORAGES
The anchorages of pre-stressed cables were also seen
(Figure 5). Some of these were damaged at various
locations which indicate that the concreting of the
anchorages was not done properly. The argument which
was usually forwarded by the site staff is that, there is lot
of steel in the anchorage zone and that is why concreting
is not proper. This was not correct. What actually
happened was, it was difficult to compact the concrete by
pin vibrators at anchor alone and it was necessary to use
surface vibrators at anchorage zones or use 16 mm rods to
compact the concrete at anchorage zone manually. Thus
careless handling of anchorages was the only cause. If
form vibrators are not available, compaction of cement
concrete could be done manually by 16 mm rods.
C.V. Kand PhD holds a B.E. Civil from College of Engineering, Pune; M.Sc. (bridges) from Surrey University,
U.K.; PhD from International University, Ceylon. He has more than 32 years experience in government
service in design and construction of bridges and 26 years experience as a private consultant in buildings
and bridges. He has published more than 100 technical papers in various journals including Indian Road
Congress and The Indian Concrete Journal. He is presently the Chairman of C.V. Kand Consultants Pvt.
Ltd., Pune.
Tanaji P. Thite holds a B.E. Civil and M.Tech (structures) from VNIT, Nagpur. He has more than five years
experience in bridge design. He is a Design Engineer at C.V. Kand Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Pune.
Sadanand Litke holds a B.E. Civil; M.E. (geotech); M.Tech (structures). He is a Junior Engineer at Pune
Municipal Corporation. He has more than three years experience in bridge construction and seven years in
water supply engineering.
34
TECHNICAL PAPER
The purpose of this study is to compare the mechanical and durability related properties of High Performance Concrete
(HPC) using, Metakaolin, Silica Fume and Fly Ash concretes for different curing ages (1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days). Marsh
cone test has been carried out to find the optimum dosage level of High Range Water Reducers for the different levels
of mineral admixtures. It has been observed that metakaolin and silica fume concrete attained the maximum level
of strength when compared to fly ash. A straight line equation has been formulated from the experimental results by
means of best fit. Durability tests like sorptivity and coefficient of absorption revealed that the value decreases as the
age of curing increases. The test results obtained from the present study shows that HPC not only possess excellent
strength properties but also in durability aspects
Keywords: HPC; admixtures; marshcone; strength; sorptivity.
Introduction
The use of HPC has been widespread in recent years
due to their technical and economical advantages. Such
materials are characterized by improved mechanical and
durability properties due to the incorporation of chemical
and mineral admixtures, as well as the use of specialized
production process. Most HPCs have denser and compact
matrices, and have, therefore, better mechanical integrity
and lower permeability than conventional concretes. The
improvement of these properties requires a low waterbinder ratio, along with the use of High Range WaterReducing Agents (HRWA) which ensure high workability
and ease of placing. Chemical admixtures create conducive
condition for the near complete hydration of cement by
deflocculating the particles of fine materials. HRWAs
The Indian Concrete Journal, September 2014, Vol. 88, Issue 9, pp. 35-45.
35
8/22/2014 6:40:07 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
of concrete and its microstructure are generally attributed
to the filler effect and the pozzolanic action of the mineral
admixture [1].
Literature Review
Ahmed Tafraoui et al. studied with the substitute product
MK obtained by fixed-bed calcination. It proved to be
almost equivalent to SF in terms of mechanical properties
and durability. Kaolinite, the clay from which MK is
produced, is readily available in most countries, and
hence the price of this ultra fine is acceptable. Moreover,
its white colour gives it an aesthetic advantage [2].
Hong-Sam Kim et al. evaluated and compared the
mechanical properties and durability of concrete using
MK, the following tests were conducted on concrete
specimens using various replacements of SF and MK;
mechanical tests such as compressive, tensile and
flexural strength tests, durability tests like rapid chloride
permeability test, immersion test in acid solution, repeated
freezing and thawing test and accelerated carbonation
test. Durability tests also verified that concrete using MK
bore most of the mechanical and durability characteristics
exhibited by concrete using SF. The tests implemented in
this study confirmed that MK constitutes a promising
material as a substitute for the cost prohibitive MK [3].
Xiaosheng et al. investigated compressive strength and
dynamic modulus of high volume FA concrete with
incorporation of either MK or SF. The water to cementitious
materials ratio was kept at 0.4 for all mixtures. The use of
high volume FA in concrete greatly reduces the strength
and dynamic modulus during the first 28 days. These
decreased properties during the short term of high
volume FA concrete are effectively compensated by the
incorporation of MK or SF. An empirical relationship
between dynamic modulus and compressive strength
of concrete has been obtained. This relation provides a
non-destructive evaluation for estimating the strength of
concrete by the use of the dynamic modulus [4].
Poon et al. carried out investigation to relate the mechanical
and durability properties of high performance MK and
SF concretes to their microstructure characteristics.
The compressive strength and chloride penetrability of
36
T
the control and the concretes incorporated with MK or
SF at water-to-binder (w/b) ratios of 0.3 and 0.5 were
determined. The pore size distribution and porosity of
the concretes were also measured. It is found that MK
concrete has superior strength development and similar
chloride resistance to SF concrete and the MK concrete at
a w/b of 0.3 has a lower porosity and smaller pore sizes
than the control (plain) concrete [5].
Nguyen et al. studied the rheological parameters of
cement grouts to their flow time through the Marsh cone
which characterizes the fluidity of grouts in a practical
way. A semi-analytical approach was established initially
on simple assumptions and then corrected based on
numerical simulation results. It presents a deviation
lower than 12% compared to numerical simulations for a
wide range of rheological characteristics of the Herschel
Bulkley fluids. It has also been validated experimentally
with success on some studied cement grouts of various
water/cement ratios [6].
Nicolas Roussel and Roy described about the Marsh cone,
a workability test used for specification and quality control
of cement pastes and grouts. It was demonstrated that,
under several consistency and geometry conditions, the
flow time reflecting fluidity may be calculated from the
plastic viscosity and yield stress in the case of a Bingham
fluid and from the cone geometry. A relation between the
behaviour parameters and the flow time of fresh pastes
tested was derived and experimentally validated. A
practical application of these results is suggested [7].
Reda Taha et al. investigated the critical review of the
current measurements of the surface absorption of
masonry units; the theoretical bases of sorptivity as a
measurement of surface absorption were presented. The
limitations of sorptivity measurement was discussed
through a review of the application of the concept of
sorptivity to different porous building materials. Analysis
of the results showed sorptivity to be a simple and reliable
measurement of surface absorption for masonry units
that could be used in building standards [8].
Erhan Guneyisi and Kasm Mermerdas reports
investigation in which the performance of plain and
8/22/2014 6:40:07 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
MK modified concretes were studied under two
different curing regimes. Investigation was carried out
for the effectiveness of MK in enhancing the strength
and permeation properties of concrete. The change in
compressive strength, sorptivity, and chloride ingress
with age at all cement replacement levels under both air
and water curing were compared with those of the control
concrete. The results indicated that the inclusion of MK
greatly reduced sorptivity and chloride permeability of
concrete in varying magnitudes, depending mainly on
replacement level of MK, w/b ratio, curing condition,
and chloride exposure period. It was found that, under
the inadequate or poor curing, MK modified concretes
suffered a more severe loss of compressive strength and
permeability-related durability than the plain concretes
[9].
The objective of the present research work is to find out
the optimum percentage replacement levels of MK/SF/
FA for a designed HPC mix, and compare the mechanical
and durability related properties for different curing ages
(1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 days). The compressive strength, flexural
strength, split tensile strength and durability related
properties like sorptivity and coefficient of absorption
of HPC incorporated with MK, SF and FA at waterto-binder (w/b) ratio of 0.3 have been experimentally
investigated and the relationships among them have
been analyzed. The marsh cone test is used for finding
optimum dosage of HRWA for the different replacement
levels of admixtures. Sorptivity test characterises the
materials ability to absorb and transmit water through it
by capillary suction. Coefficient of absorption test is used
to find the permeability of a hardened concrete.
Composition of HPC
HPC is not fundamentally different from the concrete
that we have been using all along, because it does not
contain any new ingredients and does not involve new
practices on site. But because of the lower water binder
ratio, presence of mineral and chemical admixtures etc.,
the rate of hydration of cement and the rate of strength
development in HPC is quite different from that of
conventional concrete. The HPCs usually have many
features which distinguish them from conventional
concrete. HPC is prepared through a careful selection
Cement
Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) 43 grade conforming
to IS 8112:1989.
Fine aggregate
Locally available river sand conforming to Zone II of IS
383: 1970 classifications. Specific gravity of the sand is
said to be 2.65.
Coarse aggregate
Locally available coarse aggregate of 12.5 mm, maximum
size aggregate with a specific gravity of 2.72.
Water
Potable water conforming to IS 456: 2000
Mineral Admixture
Metakaolin, Silica Fume and Fly Ash are the pozzolans
used at different replacement levels like 5%, 10% and
15%.
Metakaolin, white in colour, is a manufactured and
process controlled reactive aluminosilicate pozzolana. It
is derived from purified kaolin clay, formed by calcining
purified kaolinite at a specified temperature range,
generally between 650-7000 C. Kaolin largely consists of the
mineral kaolinite. Kaolinite is hydrous aluminum silicate
and can be chemically represented by Al2O3.2SiO2.2H2O.
They are angular in shape. The particle size of metakaolin
is significantly smaller than the cement particles, but not
as fine as silica fume. Its average particle size has been
reported to be of the order of 1.5 m.
Silica fume, also referred to as microsilica or condensed
silica fume, is another material that is used as an artificial
pozzolanic admixture. It is a product resulting from
reduction of high purity quartz with coal in an electric
arc furnace in the manufacture of silicon or ferrosilicon
alloy. Silica fume rises as an oxidised vapour. It cools,
condenses and is collected in cloth bags. It is further
37
8/22/2014 6:40:07 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
Property
HRWR
Type
55
Aspect
0.7
2.5
Relative Density
0.4
0.8
9.2
pH
0.5
4.4
< 0.2%
Cement
(%)
MK
(%)
SF
(%)
FA
(%)
SiO2
21.8
52.3
90.0
Al2O3
4.9
44.9
Fe2O3
3.6
CaO
63.2
MgO
0.9
0.2
1.2
1.1
Specific gravity
1.09
Na2O
0.22
0.12
0.31
0.54
34% by weight
K2O
0.69
0.02
1.62
TiO2
0.51
SO3
1.8
Loss on ignition
1.2
0.8
4.7
Specific gravity
3.15
2.5
2.2
2.1
Specific surface
(cm2/g)
3080
12,680
210000
4250
Chemical Admixture
HRWR is used for the HPC mix conforming to IS 9103:1999
and ASTM C494 Type F. Table 2 shows the properties of
HRWR.
38
EN 934-2 T3.1/3.2
IS 9103: 1999
Mix Design
A number of standard mix proportioning methods
or guidelines are available for conventional Normal
Strength Concrete (NSC). But for the design of HPC the
available methodology is limited. Mix proportioning of
HPC is a more critical process than that of NSC in view
of the high powder content and requirement of the low
water cementitious (binder) ratio. Aitcin suggested a
mix proportion method, based on the combination of
empirical method and absolute volume method. In this
study, Aitcin method is adopted for mix design [10].
The procedure to be followed in designing a concrete mix
is detailed below.
1. A suggestion of water/cementitious materials
ratio can be found by a nomogram (from 40 to 160
MPa at 28 days).
2. Estimation of minimum water dosage, according
to the superplasticizer saturation point.
3. The HRWR dosage can be deduced from the
dosage at the saturation point. If the saturation
point is not known, it is suggested to start with a
trial dosage of 1.0%.
4. The coarse aggregate content can be found
according to its shape. If its shape is not known, a
8/22/2014 6:40:08 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 3. Details of HPC mixes
Series
w/b
Mix
Water
(kg/m3)
Binder (kg/m3)
Cement
MK
SF
FA
Coarse
aggregates
(kg/m3)
Fine
aggregates
(kg/m3)
HRWR
(l/m3)
Slump
(mm)
0.30
0%
150.36
500
1074.32
718.91
5.50
95
0.30
5% MK
150.36
474.88
24.99
1074.32
718.91
5.50
85
0.30
10% MK
150.36
449.88
49.99
1074.32
714.15
5.50
75
0.30
15% MK
150.36
424.89
74.98
1074.32
709.39
5.50
65
0.30
5% SF
155.36
490.71
25.83
1074.32
684.94
6.34
90
0.30
10% SF
155.36
464.88
51.65
1074.32
676.31
6.34
92.5
0.30
15% SF
155.36
439.05
77.48
1074.32
667.67
6.34
85
0.30
5% FA
155.36
490.71
25.83
1074.32
681.40
7.58
75
0.30
10% FA
155.36
464.88
51.65
1074.32
671.29
7.58
70
0.30
15% FA
155.36
439.05
77.48
1074.32
661.18
7.58
65
150 mm
2 mm
sieve
Capacity
1.2 I
350
mm
O.D = 5 mm
50 mm
39
8/22/2014 6:40:08 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
T
MK-2.5%
MK-7.5%
65
MK-12.5%
MK -5%
MK -10%
MK -15%
60
55
50
45
40
0.6
0.8
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.8
SF-2.5%
SF-7.5%
60
SF-12.5%
SF-5%
SF-10%
SF-15%
called the saturation dosage, and the flow time, the flow
time for the saturation dosage. Figures 2 to 4 shows the
variation of flow time with HRWR dosage for different
replacement levels of admixtures with cement. Flow
times decrease with an increase in HRWR dosage and
after a certain dosage as the saturation dosage, remains
practically constant or increase in some cases. This trend
indicates that the fluidity, as expected, increases with an
increase in the HRWR content until the saturation point
and later remains unchanged or decreases. The optimum
dosage of HRWR obtained for MK is in the range of 1.2 %
and for SF and FA it varies from 1.4% to 1.6%. From the
graphs, it have been observed that MK concrete requires
less dosage of HRWR when compared to SF and FA
concrete to achieve similar workability at the same water
binder ratio. In the pastes with FA, the maximum flow
times obtained were about 108 seconds, 63 seconds for
MK and 57 seconds for SF; this is due to the fineness and
specific surface of binder.
55
50
Compressive Strength
45
40
35
30
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
FA-5%
FA-10%
FA-15%
FA-2.5%
FA-7.5%
FA-12.5%
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
40
8/22/2014 6:40:08 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
3 days
7 days
14 days
95
85
75
65
55
45
35
25
MK-0%
MK-05%
MK-10%
3 days
7 days
14 days
85
75
65
55
45
35
1 day
SF-05%
SF-10%
7
6
5
3 days
7 days
14 days
85
75
65
55
45
35
FA-05%
FA-10%
FA-15%
MK-05%
MK-10%
MK-15%
3 days
7 days
14 days
28 days
11
9
8
7
6
5
SF-0%
SF-05%
SF-10%
SF-15%
28 days
95
FA-0%
MK-0%
10
SF-15%
1 day
9
8
25
10
1 day
25
SF-0%
28 days
11
28 days
95
14 days
1 day
7 days
12
MK-15%
3 days
1 day
28 days
1 day
3 days
7 days
14 days
28 days
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
FA-0%
FA-05%
FA-10%
FA-15%
41
8/22/2014 6:40:08 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
T
Best Fit
MK
11
y=0.294x 0.7867
10
R = 0.901
9
8
7
6
5
40
60
50
70
Compressive strength,
90
80
N/mm 2
Flexural Strength
Figure 11. Flexural strength vs Compressive strength ( Metakaolin)
Best Fit
SF
11
10
9
y=0.396x 0.7117
2
R = 0.8043
7
6
5
4
45
35
55
65
Compressive strength,
85
75
95
N/mm 2
Best Fit
SF
10
y=0.326x 0.7483
R = 0.8217
8
7
5
35
45
55
75
65
42
Sorptivity
85
8/22/2014 6:40:09 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
3 days
14 days
6
5
4
3
2
1
MK-0%
MK-05%
MK-10%
1 day
3 days
7 days
14 days
5
4
3
2
SF-0%
SF-05%
SF-10%
y=0.0099x 13951
2
R = 0.8567
5
4
3
2
1
40
50
90
80
70
60
28 days
MK-15%
Best Fit
MK
28 days
7 days
SF-15%
1 day
Best Fit
SF
y=0.0783x 0.9238
R = 0.9454
4
3
2
1
25
55
45
35
65
75
85
95
3 days
7 days
14 days
28 days
5
4
3
2
1
5
Split tensile strength, N/mm 2
1 day
FA-0%
FA-05%
FA-10%
FA-15%
Best Fit
FA
y=0.0945x 0.8334
2
R = 0.754
3
2
1
35
45
55
75
65
85
43
8/22/2014 6:40:09 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
Coefficient of absorption
Mix
7 days
14 days
28 days
0%
3.87
3.41
2.94
2.63
5% MK
1.53
1.15
0.88
0.84
10% MK
1.43
0.93
0.70
0.63
15% MK
0.84
0.75
0.73
0.53
5% SF
1.16
0.97
0.78
0.66
10% SF
1.13
0.90
0.85
0.60
15% SF
5% FA
10% FA
1.04
0.90
0.71
0.81
0.82
0.75
0.69
0.64
0.59
0.57
0.42
0.38
15% FA
0.72
0.64
0.58
0.37
1
2
Conclusion
Compressive Strength
Mix
(m/ s) x 10-6
1
2
44
3 days
7 days
14 days
28 days
0%
15.62
12.98
12.06
11.84
5% MK
10% MK
15% MK
5% SF
10% SF
15% SF
5% FA
10% FA
15% FA
9.54
8.94
6.06
7.97
7.60
7.15
5.87
4.60
4.75
7.67
5.71
5.17
6.02
5.72
5.28
5.55
4.87
4.62
6.23
5.31
5.02
5.94
5.36
4.63
4.08
3.89
3.55
6.17
4.36
4.02
4.32
4.05
3.97
2.98
2.77
2.62
Sorptivity (m/s)
x 10-4
Good
0.13
Acceptable
0.13 to 0.26
Poor
>0.26
8/22/2014 6:40:09 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
The compressive strength (28 days) of MK mixes is
found to be 1.022 and 1.17 times that of SF and FA
mixes respectively.
Reference
1. Shi Hui-sheng Xu, Bi-wan and Zhou Xiao-chen, Influence of mineral
admixtures on compressive strength, gas permeability and carbonation
of high performance concrete. Construction and Building Materials, Vol.
23, pp 19801985
2. Ahmed Tafraoui, Gilles Escadeillas, Soltane Lebaili and Thierry Vidal,
Metakaolin in the formulation of UHPC, Construction and Building
Materials, Vol. 23,pp 669674
3. Hong-Sam Kim Sang-Ho Lee and Han-Young Moon, Strength
properties and durability aspects of high strength concrete using
Korean metakaolin, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 21, pp
12291237
4. Xiaoqian Qian, Zongjin Li, The relationships between stress and strain
for high-performance concrete with metakaolin, Cement and Concrete
Research Vol.31, pp1607 1611
5. C.S. Poon and L. Lam, Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity
and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume
concrete, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 20, pp 858865
6. V.H. Nguyen, S. Remond, J.L. Gallias, J.P. Bigasa, P. Muller, Flow
of HerschelBulkley fluids through the Marsh cone, Journal of NonNewtonian Fluid Mechanics. 139 pp 128134
7. R. Le Roy and N. Roussel, The Marsh Cone as a viscometer: theoretical
analysis and practical limits, Materials and Structures/Materiaux et
Constructions,Vol. 37, Month 2004, pp
8. M. M. Reda Taha, Sorptivity: a reliable measurement for surface
absorption of masonry brick units, Materials and Structures/Materiaux
et Constructions, Vol. 34, pp 438-445
9. Erhan Guneyisi and Kasm Mermerdas, Comparative study on
strength, sorptivity, and chloride ingress characteristics of air-cured
and water-cured concretes modified with metakaolin, Materials and
Structures, Vol. 40, pp 11611171
10. P.C. Aitcin, High Performance Concrete, University of Sherbrooke,
Canada.
11. Taywood Engineering Ltd., Australia (1993), Correspondance to MBT
(Singapore) Pvt. Ltd.
12. Powers T.C., Properties of fresh concrete, New York: Wiley; 1968.
Dr. Karthikeyan Jayakumar is an Assistant Professor, Civil Engineering Department, National Institute of
Technology, Tiruchirapalli, Tamil Nadu. His research interests include prestressed concrete bridges, longspan bridges and advancements in concrete technology and materials.
K. Shaheer Ali is a Structural Design Engineer in Mammut Building Systems (A subsidiary of Emaar
Industries), Sharjah, UA.E . His research interest includes Effect of different admixtures in HPC, durability
and microstructural studies in HPC, analysis and design of steel & concrete structures.
45
8/22/2014 6:40:10 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
The limitations are laid down on percentage of various deleterious materials in aggregate by most of the national
standards. Moreover, recent researches had shown that these limits are too conservative. In the present paper, an
attempt has been made to study the feasibility of current limits on percentage of clay lumps in fine and coarse aggregate.
Variation of clay lump percentage from 0 to 5% resulted in casting of 66 cube specimens of size (150150150) mm
and testing for its direct compressive strength. The study revealed that the limits on percentage of clay lumps in fine and
coarse aggregate shall be modified as 3% as against limits of various national standards.
Keywords: Concrete; aggregate; deleterious material; clay lumps.
1. Introduction
The properties of aggregate play an important role in
performance of concrete. Some deleterious materials may
present in coarse and fine aggregate. Deleterious substances
are those that are present as minor constituents of either
fine or coarse aggregate but are capable of adversely
affecting the workability, setting and hardening, and
durability characteristics of concrete.All the deleterious
materials are harmful as they react chemically with
cement paste. The main deleterious materials observed in
natural aggregate are as follows:
46
8/22/2014 5:34:19 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
effect of clayey impurities in sand from Akure metropolis
on Ondo State, Nigeria. For experimentation 10 different
sand samples from different locations had been collected
and 1:2:4 mix ratio was adopted for this experimentation.
It had been discovered that higher the percentage of clay
content in sand sample, higher is the reduction effect on
cube strength [15].
Olanitori conducted an experiment on concrete with
nominal mix of 1:2:4 with varying clay content from 0 to
10% by weight of fine aggregate clay were added externally
to washed, sundried sample of fine aggregate [14]. It had
been found that higher the clay/silt content, higher is
the amount of cement needed to maintain compressive
strength of concrete not less than 20 N/mm2.
Fernandes et.al pointed out the effective use of clay
contaminated with local sand for concrete in developing
countries. In this study, properties of concrete had been
tested with normal sand, with sand containing 20%
substitution of kaolin and sand with 20% substitution
of montmorillonite. Montmorillonite contaminated sand
requires higher w/c ratio as it is having greater surface area
than kaolin. In this investigation further recommendation
of using this local sand with clay content for low cost
housing in developing countries had been done [16].
Indian
standards
IS 383:1970
American
standards
ASTM C 33
1.00%
1.00%
1.00%
2.00%
British
standards
BS 882:1993
Not
specified
47
8/22/2014 5:34:19 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
Description
Test Result
Fineness of cement
3.12%
Specific gravity
3.15%
30%
66 N/mm2
Proportion by Weight
Quantity (kg/m3)
Cement
1.00
418.5
Water content
0.40
167.0
Fine aggregate
1.65
688.5
Coarse aggregate
3.07
1285.7
Super plasticizer
0.0060
2.5
Material
Test Results
Fine
aggregate
Coarse
aggregate
Fineness modulus
3.76
8.22
Specific gravity
2.88
2.74
Surface moisture
0.0%
0.0%
Water absorption
1.0%
1.0%
0.78%
0.01%
48
Percentage of
clay lumps in
fine aggregate
Compressive
strength
(N/mm2)
Percentage
decrease in
compressive
strength
7
Days
28
Days
7
Days
28
Days
M1
0.00
32.20
47.36
0.00
0.00
M2
1.00
29.01
43.68
9.91
7.77
M3
2.00
28.79
42.45
10.59
10.37
M4
3.00
26.20
40.42
18.63
14.65
M5
4.00
23.72
37.04
26.34
21.79
M6
5.00
21.09
30.95
34.50
34.65
8/22/2014 5:34:19 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 6. Compressive strength of concrete (clay lumps in
coarse aggregate)
Mix
designation
Percentage of
clay lumps
in coarse
aggregate
Compressive
strength
(N/mm2)
Percentage
decrease in
compressive
strength
7
days
28
days
7
days
28
days
M1
0.00
32.20
47.36
0.00
0.00
M7
1.00
28.82
42.85
10.50
9.52
M8
2.00
28.01
42.01
13.01
11.30
M9
3.00
25.23
39.71
21.65
16.15
M10
4.00
23.09
35.91
28.29
24.18
M11
5.00
19.89
29.45
38.23
37.82
Indian
standards
(IS 383:1970)
American
standards
(ASTM
C33:2003)
Suggested
revised
limits
1.0%
1.0%
3.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
5. Conclusions
The experimentation with variation of percentage of clay
lumps in fine and coarse aggregate used for concrete
reveals following inferences:
1. The compressive strength of concrete reduces
in significant amount as the percentage of clay
lumps in fine and coarse aggregate increases.
2. The limits should be raised to 3 % for percentage
of clay lumps in fine and coarse aggregate. This
proposed revision will not affect the compressive
strength of concrete more than 15 %.
3. The proposed revision will result in economical
usage of natural aggregates thus minimizing cost
of project and environmental issues.
References
1. A.M. Neville, Properties of concrete, J. Wiley, New York, 1996.
2. American standard specification for concrete aggregates, ASTM C
33,Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials,
2003.
3. British standard specification for aggregates from natural sources for
concrete, BS 882-1992 British standard institutions, London.
4. C. Arum and A.O. Olotuah, Making of strong and durable concrete, Emirates
Journal for Engineering Research, 11 (1), 25-31 (2006).
5. Indian standard recommended guidelines for concrete mix proportioning, IS
10262-2009, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
6. Indian standard specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement, IS
12269-1987, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
7. Indian standard specification for coarse and fine aggregates from natural
sources for concrete, IS 383-1970, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
8. Indian standard specification for method of test for aggregate, IS 2386-1963,
Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi.
9. Jose F Munoz,M. Isabel Tejedor Marc A. Anderson, Expanded study on the
effects of aggregate coating and films on concrete performance, final report
The Wisconsin Department Of Transportation, October 2007.
49
8/22/2014 5:34:20 PM
TECHNICAL PAPER
10. Justin K. Norvell, Influence of clays and clay-sized particles on concrete
performance, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE/ Dec. 2007.
11. Lea F. M., Chemistry of Cement and Concrete, Edward Arnold Publishers,
London, 1956.
12. Mehta, P. K., and Monteiro P. J. M., Concrete: Structure, properties and
materials, Prentice Hall, N. J., 1993.
13. Naik C.V. and Londhe R.S., Experimental investigation on effect of
deleterious material in aggregate on compressive strength of concrete, M.
E. Dissertation, Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of
Engineering, Aurangabad, January (2014) .
14. Olanitori L.M., Mitigating the effect of clay content of sand on concrete
strength, 31st Conference on Our World in Concrete and Structures; 15-17
August 2006, Singapore. pp 344- 352.
15. Olotuah A.O. and Olanitori L.M., The effect of clayey impurities in sand on
the crushing strength of concrete (a case study of sand in Akure metropolis,
Ondo State, Nigeria), Proceedings of 30th Conference on Our World in
Concrete and Structures, Singapore, 23-24 August. pp 373-376.
16. V.A. Fernandes, P. Purnell, G.T. Still, T.H. Thomas, The effect of clay content
in sands used for cementitious materials in developing countries, Cement
and Concrete Research 37 (2007) 751758.
Dr. R. S. Londhe holds a B.E. in civil engineering from Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli, M.E. in
structural engineering from Government College of Engineering, Pune and PhD in structural engineering
from Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, Uttarakhand. He is an Associate Professor of Applied
Mechanics, Department of Applied Mechanics, Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad,
Maharashtra. He has more than 25 years of experience in teaching and administration. His areas of
expertise and research interest include, high-rise buildings, reinforced and prestressed concrete, structural
dynamics and earthquake engineering and structural reliability. He has published number of papers in
national and international journals and conferences.
Chinmay V. Naik holds a B.E. in civil engineering from University of Pune and Masters in structural
engineering from Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad. He is an Assistant Professor in
Department of Civil engineering at S.S.P.Ms Someshwar Engineering College, Baramati, Maharashtra.
His areas of interest are properties of aggregates, microstructure of concrete, fiber reinforced concrete and
development of spreadsheets for structural analysis and design.
50
8/22/2014 5:34:20 PM
POINT OF VIEW
...(1)
Location
1988
Bihar
1991
Uttarkashi
1993
Killari
1997
Jabalpur
1999
Chamoli
2001
Bhuj
Casualties
Buildings Collapsed
1,004
2,50,000
768
42,400
8,000
30,000
38
8,546
100
2,595
13,805
2,31,000
2004
Sumatra
10,805
2005
Kashmir
~1,500
4,50,000
2006
Sikkim
Not available
Not available
[Murty, 2007; Sebeer et al, 1993; Jain et al, 1994; Jain et al, 1997; Jain et al, 1999;
Jain et al, 2001; Jain et al, 2005; Murty and Rai, 2005; Murty et al, 2011; Murty et
al, 2012]
51
POINT OF VIEW
Jabalpur (M6.0) in 1997, Chamoli (M6.8) in 1999, Bhuj
(M6.9) in 2001, Sumatra (M8.9) and Kashmir (M7.6) in
2005) caused around 40,000 fatalities due to collapse
of buildings. Seismic Hazard Assessment quantifies
the physical expression of the hazard, in the form of
intensity of earthquake shaking. Rational understanding
of the seismic hazard of the different areas is critical to a
meaningful risk assessment exercise.
Figure 1 shows the seismic activity in India from 1819
to 2009. There is a noticeable increment in the number
of earthquakes especially after 1950. Also, the fault
map of India (Figure 2) suggests the landmass is highly
fragmented by faults and the likelihood of damaging
earthquakes taking place at different areas. A seismic
zone map is expected to provide the levels of earthquake
shaking expected in different areas.
The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has been publishing
SEISMIC FAULTS
120
100
80
LEGEND
60
Fault
Sub-surface fault
Shear zone
Neotectonic fault
40
20
0
1840 1860 1880 1990 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2002
Years
52
Thrust
Neotectonic thrust
Trench axis
Suture
Normal fault
Strike slip fault
Volcano
POINT OF VIEW
IS 1893:1962
IS 1893:1966
(b)
(a)
IS 1893:1984
IS 1893:2002
(d)
Figure 3. Sketches of seismic zone maps of India (Based on IS 1893-1962, 1966,1984 and 2007)
53
POINT OF VIEW
were adopted namely zones II, III, IV and V (Figure 3d).
The erstwhile areas under zone I were merged with areas
in Zone II. Zone II is said to experience low intensities
of shaking and zone V high. Most of peninsular region
is shown under zone II and III. Zone I was completely
discarded in this revision. This map only tells about the
intensity experienced in the past, but not the intensity
of shaking expected in the future. It does not address
another concern, namely what is the maximum shaking
intensity that is likely to occur during the life of a house
in a certain area of the country. But, for a common man
the value of probability is not important. It is necessary to
know the worst intensity of shaking that his house should
be designed for so that he is safe during that expected
design event. Table 2 gives the projected intensities of
shaking in different seismic zones in India.
Zone
Seismic Zone
Factor (Z)
Shaking
Intensity
Houses
Number
% of total
II
0.10
VI (or lower)
4,39,86,517
17.78%
III
0.16
VII
11,58,68,042
46.86
IV
0.24
VIII
6,32,83,128
25.60
0.36
IX (or higher)
2,41,44,350
9.76
Year of
Census
Number of
Houses
1961
10,98,00,000
1971
13,70,00,000
24.80
24.77
24.77
1981
17,08,00,000
24.67
55.56
30.79
1991
21,16,00,000
23.85
92.71
37.15
2001
25,68,00,000
21.35
133.88
41.17
2011
30,48,82,448
18.69
177.67
43.79
4001 - 6000
> 6000
Persons/km 2
54
Increase (%)
From
previous
decade
Cumulative
since 1961
Decadal
Increment
since 1961
POINT OF VIEW
led to shortage of technical manpower to undertake the
construction work, in addition to shortage of construction
materials. Figure 5 shows district-wise spatial distribution
of housing densities. Rural districts have up to 100 houses
per km2, towns 1000-1500 km2, cities 1500-2500 houses
per km2 and urban centers and metro go as high as 7000
houses per km2. As per 2011 census, district-wise density
of housing is higher near urban areas. Many of these high
density areas also lie in moderate to high seismic zones.
Housing Density
0 - 500
501 - 1500
1501 - 2500
> 2500
Houses/km2
Table 4. Housing with roof and wall material from 2011 census of India
S.No
Item
Urban
India
%
15.02
Roof Material
Grass/Thatch/Bamboo/Wood..
33,126,016
19.94
3,611,906
4.60
36,737,922
Plastic/ Polythene
1,047,533
0.63
500,251
0.64
1,547,784
0.63
30,386,085
18.29
4,863,880
6.20
35,249,965
14.41
17,307,198
10.42
5,503,054
7.01
22,810,252
9.32
Burnt Brick
11,990,029
7.22
4,231,255
5.39
16,221,284
6.63
Stone/Slate
14,746,138
8.87
6,222,441
7.93
20,968,579
8.57
G.I./Metal/Asbestos sheets
26,522,852
15.96
12,476,710
15.90
38,999,562
15.94
Concrete
30,423,701
18.31
40,764,887
51.94
71,188,588
29.10
Any other
607,051
0.37
310,595
0.40
917,646
0.38
Grand Total
166,156,603
100.00
78,484,979
100.00
244,641,582
100.00
Wall Material
Grass/thatch/bamboo etc.
26,417,331
12.79
2,530,263
2.57
28,947,594
9.49
Plastic/ Polythene
762,256
0.37
335,575
0.34
1,097,831
0.36
Mud/unburnt brick
58,330,614
28.24
8,119,213
8.26
66,449,827
21.80
Wood
2,132,342
1.03
648,929
0.66
2,781,271
0.91
G.I./metal/asbestos sheets
1,269,359
0.61
1,062,510
1.08
2,331,869
0.76
Burnt brick
83,618,436
40.48
62,927,369
64.00
146,545,805
48.07
Stone
28,685,790
13.89
14797142
15.05
43,482,932
14.26
Concrete
3,699,096
1.79
7,284,583
7.41
10,983,679
3.60
Any other
1,648,466
0.80
613,174
0.62
2,261,640
0.74
Grand Total
206,563,690
100.00
98,318,758
100.00
304,882,448
100.00
55
POINT OF VIEW
Table 5. Housing with roof and wall material from 2001 census of India
S.No
Item
Rural
Urban
Total
No. of Houses
No. of Houses
No. of Houses
Roof Material
1
4,88,12,470
27.49
45,73,534
6.94
5,33,86,004
21.19
6,52,99,492
36.78
1,25,91,573
19.12
8,11,44,290
32.21
2,18,34,160
12.30
41,47,242
6.30
3,12,28,354
12.40
1,86,65,296
10.51
1,18,21,919
17.95
3,04,87,215
12.10
Concrete, RBC/RCC
2,10,61,294
11.86
3,17,77,933
48.25
5,28,39,227
20.98
Plastic, Polythene
6,69,815
0.38
5,03,956
0.77
11,73,771
0.47
11,94,986
0.67
4,50,682
0.68
16,45,668
0.65
10
Total
17,75,37,513
100
6,58,66,839
100
25,19,04,529
100
Wall Material
1
2,21,62,932
12.50
25,74,189
3.60
2,47,37,121
9.93
6,58,07,212
37.13
79,91,950
11.17
7,37,99,162
29.63
Wood
23,63,200
1.33
8,33,792
1.17
31,96,992
1.28
Burnt Brick
6,25,15,919
35.27
4,91,75,710
68.72
11,18,91,629
44.92
7,76,677
0.44
11,22,001
1.57
19,98,678
0.80
Stone
2,03,47,899
11.48
51,33,918
7.17
2,54,81,817
10.23
Cement Concrete
22,53,979
1.27
42,86,359
5.99
65,40,338
2.63
Plastic, Polythene
4,77,498
0.27
2,44,278
0.34
7,21,776
0.29
5,32,197
0.30
1,96,159
0.27
7,28,356
0.29
10
Total
17,72,37,513
100
7,15,58,356
100
20,90,95,869
100
Table 6. Housing with roof and wall material from 1991 census of India
S.No
Item
Rural
Urban
Total
No. of Houses
No. of Houses
No. of Houses
Roof Material
1
5,32,76,234
37.26
58,27,404
12.56
5,91,03,638
29.46
5,49,23,205
38.41
1,22,86,604
26.49
6,72,09,809
33.50
1,36,04,738
9.51
56,35,042
12.15
2,45,29,786
12.23
99,28,111
6.94
45,67,502
9.85
2,04,32,153
10.19
Concrete, RBC/RCC
64,45,758
4.51
1,63,11,517
35.16
2,27,57,275
11.34
48,08,404
3.36
17,59,044
3.79
65,67,448
3.27
Total
14,29,86,450
100
4,63,87,113
100
20,06,00,109
100
Wall Material
56
1,70,56,489
11.93
25,31,939
5.07
1,95,88,428
9.55
6,72,18,236
47.01
54,22,316
10.85
8,48,10,594
41.34
Wood
17,95,840
1.26
10,70,553
2.14
28,66,393
1.40
Burnt Brick
3,66,46,602
25.63
3,22,50,772
64.53
6,88,97,374
33.59
2,51,910
0.18
7,64,956
1.53
10,16,866
0.50
Stone
1,72,84,400
12.09
44,19,591
8.84
2,17,03,991
10.58
Cement Concrete
11,55,760
0.81
28,00,780
5.60
39,56,540
1.93
Ekra
2,01,039
0.14
53,869
0.11
2,54,908
0.12
13,76,176
0.96
6,66,373
1.33
20,42,549
1.00
10
Total
14,29,86,452
100
4,99,81,149
100
20,51,37,643
100
POINT OF VIEW
2001 Bhuj earthquake, they collapsed at an intensity of
shaking of VII, when MSK scale expects them to collapse
only after intensity IX of ground shaking. Thus, there is
urgent need to understand the housing risk in the country
to minimize the future losses of life and property.
1.3.1 Choice of Building Materials
The choice of materials used in construction throughout
the country is shown in Table 4; the choice for natural
materials is high. In the choice of roofing material, around
75% of houses in rural areas use natural and locally
available material for construction; in the remaining 25%
houses cement-based materials are used. On the contrary,
in urban areas, cement-based materials are upto 50% and
naturally available material the remaining 50%. For the
wall, 90% of houses use natural material only, But, in
urban areas, it is up to 10%. Tables 5 and 6 describe the
materials used in construction of roof and wall in 2001
and 1991 respectively. Comparing the materials used, use
of grass, thatch, bamboo and wood in roofing dropped
from around 30% in 1991 census to 21% in 2001 census.
During the same period, usage of concrete increased
from 11.34% to 20.98%. Also, plastics have found place in
construction in 2001 which were absent earlier. A similar
situation is seen also in the choice of material for wall
construction. But, earthquake resistance of the newly
introduced materials remains to be understood when
used for structural purposes. The dominant materials
of choice for roofing in rural areas are: 27.49% of grass,
thatch, bamboo, wood; 36.78% of slates & shingles; 12.3%
of mud stone or lime and 11.86% of concrete. In urban
areas, concrete is used for roofing in 48.25% cases. And,
the dominant material of choice for walling in rural areas
is: 12.5% of grass, thatch, bamboo, wood; 37.13% of slates
& shingles; 35.27% of burnt brick; and 1.27% of concrete.
And in urban areas burnt and un-burnt brick together is
75.55%.
20,000-1,00,000)
57
POINT OF VIEW
those with low hazard and moderate to low population
densities.
58
State
HRF
Greater Bombay
Maharashtra
544,735
North 24 Panganas
West Bengal
446,074
Pune
Maharashtra
413,882
Medinipur
West Bengal
394,542
Thane
Maharashtra
377,690
South 24 Panganas
West Bengal
330,041
Barddhaman
West Bengal
284,887
Murshidabad
West Bengal
277,718
Jalpaiguri
West Bengal
270,831
Madhubani
Bihar
269,774
Ahmadabad
Gujarat
245,830
Purbi Champaran
Bihar
238,538
Muzaffarpur
Bihar
233,549
Kamrup
Assam
216,099
Surat
Gujarat
214,061
Darbhanga
Bihar
212,412
Haora
West Bengal
212,324
Samastipur
Bihar
208,974
Koch Bihar
West Bengal
208,110
Hugli (Chunchura)
West Bengal
207,631
POINT OF VIEW
systems to develop over the next two decades the large
manpower necessary to address earthquake safety of
the country. Post-earthquake emergency response alone
(which is the current strategy) will not solve the problem;
mitigation (i.e., safer constructions) actions need to be
taken urgently, if the country wishes to reduce the loss of
life in upcoming earthquakes.
59
POINT OF VIEW
Table 8. Some impediments to implementing earthquake disaster mitigation initiatives in India
S.No.
Item to be
implemented
Bottleneck
Way forward
A. Technical Issues
A.1 CAPACITY BUILDING :: Introducing Earthquake Engineering Components in Technical Education
1
Change curriculum
Train teachers
Prepare teaching
resource materials
Augment library
and laboratory
infrastructure
Initiate research
in universities/
institutes
Identify Master
Trainers
Prepare teaching
resource materials
Undertake training
60
Develop training
centers
POINT OF VIEW
Table 8. Continued
S.No.
Item to be
implemented
Bottleneck
Way forward
Prepare teaching
resource materials
Undertake training
Update bye-laws
at all municipal
government levels
Penalise violations
from approved
construction
Constitute
State Disaster
Management
Authorities and
State Executive
Committees in all
states and hold
meeting regularly
Development of
strong techno-legal
regime
Retrofit existing
lifeline structures
B. Legal Issues
C. Administrative Issues
C. Financial Issues
Financial lending
institutions to
independently verify
earthquake safety
of the constructions,
before approving the
loans
61
POINT OF VIEW
documented. For this, first the housing typologies being
practiced need to be understood and documented in
detail. High quality cartoons/animation strategies may
be adopted to do this.
4. CONCLUDING REMARKS
62
POINT OF VIEW
contracts of all major projects across the country
with profit maximization motive, and no respect
for adherence to the design and construction standards and to quality control and quality assurance practices needed in the development of built
environment).
This paper attempts to bring to the public eye the urgency
of the matter, and develop a pressure group that can
sensitize these three critical groups of stakeholders to
undertake the measures that are in their purview.
References
1. BMTPC, (1997), Vulnerability Atlas of India 1997, Building Materials
and Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi
2. BMTPC, (2007), Vulnerability Atlas of India 2007, Building Materials
and Technology Promotion Council, New Delhi
3. MHA, (1961), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
4. MHA, (1971), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
5. MHA, (1981), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
6. MHA, (1991), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
7. MHA, (2001), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
8. MHA, (2011), Census of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government
of India, New Delhi
9. GSI, (2003), Seismotectonic Atlas of India and its Environs, Geological
Survey of India, Kolkata
10. IS 1893 (Part I), (2007), Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake
Resistant Design of Structures, Bureau of India Standards, New
Delhi
11. Jain,S.K., Murty,C.V.R., Chandak,N.N., Seeber,L., and Jain,N.K, (1994),
The September 29, 1993, M6.4 Killari, Maharashtra, Earthquake in
Dr. Ramancharla Pradeep Kumar holds a PhD degree in civil engineering from University of Tokyo,
Japan. He is an Associate Professor and Head of Earthquake Engineering Research Centre (EERC) at IIIT
Hyderabad. His research interests are numerical modelling of faults and tectonic plates, collapse simulation
of buildings, seismic evaluation and strengthening of buildings and concrete codes in India. He is a panel
member of CED 2: IS 456, IS 1343 and also member of Earthquake Engineering Sectional Committee of the
Bureau of Indian Standards.
C.V.R. Murty is a Professor in Department of Civil Engineering at the Indian Institute of Technology
Madras, Chennai. His research interests include the non-linear behaviour of reinforced concrete and steel
buildings and bridges, and of limit state design of reinforced concrete, relevant to earthquake-resistant
structures. He is a member of the Earthquake Engineering Committee of the Bureau of Indian Standards.
63
TECHNICAL PAPER
Damping is a desirable property of a structure from the earthquake resistant point of view. Thus, in dynamic analysis of
structures, the modeling of damping plays a crucial role in achieving the safe response of structure. Any deviation in the
representation of damping from the actual damping in the analytical model may result anything between small failure
and catastrophic collapse, thus highlighting the importance of damping in a dynamic analysis of structures. Unlike
mass and stiffness matrices, damping cannot be determined analytically thus bringing dynamic analysis in a state of
uncertainty. Various representations of damping have evolved over the period of years which are tailor-made to specific
problems. It has been generally accepted that there is no single universally accepted method for the representation of
damping in an analytical manner. In this paper, an attempt has been made in reviewing the various damping models
that are currently in practice.
Keywords: Damping; linear; non-linear; viscous; Rayleigh, dampers.
1. INTRODUCTION
Any structure subjected to vibration cannot continue
to vibrate infinitely. It has to come to rest after some
period of time. It is well understood that some amount
of damping or energy loss is present inherently in any
structure. Nevertheless, it is imperative to note that the
damping is the desired property of the structure and hence
should be expressed and incorporated in the analysis of
dynamic systems in a proper way. The source of damping
is not clearly understood and hence the incorporation of
damping is a concern in dynamic analysis. In order to
understand the phenomenon of damping and the factors
that affect damping, various experimental investigations
have been conducted over the period of years [1]. However,
the exact parameters influencing the damping cannot be
The Indian Concrete Journal, September 2014, Vol. 88, Issue 9, pp. 64-72
64
TECHNICAL PAPER
damping is said to occur. The damping may also be due
to radiation of seismic waves away from foundation. The
vibration amplitude, structural materials, fundamental
natural period of vibration, mode shapes and structural
configuration are some of the important factors affecting
the damping property of the structure . Sometimes, the
interaction of the structure with surrounding air and
water are considered as aerodynamic and hydrodynamic
damping. It has also been reported that the shape of the
building structure has a strong influence on the response
of structures. Hence, it is suggested to have chamfered
shapes and slotted corners instead of regular basic
shapes in order to mitigate the response of tall buildings
especially in the case of wind effects. Rounding of a
corner to a circular shape has resulted in a significant
reduction in the response of structures. The application
of hydrodynamic dampers in off-shore structures is
reported in [2]. For very tall buildings, the inherent
damping may not be sufficient in mitigation of structural
response adequately. Hence the use of supplemental
or auxiliary damping is vital in keeping the response
of tall buildings to the desired level from safety and
serviceability point of view. Incorporating the effect of
damping in any structure requires a clear understanding
of the parameters that affect damping. When damping
is introduced, the general shape of the response curve
does not change, but the magnitudes are greatly reduced.
Many mathematical techniques have been developed
over the period of several years for different applications.
It is also of paramount importance to identify the sources
of damping so that it can be reasonably incorporated in
the analytical model.
2. SOURCES OF DAMPING
The fundamental effect of damping is to reduce the peak
amplitudes of the vibrating system with little alteration
in natural frequency. The sources of damping can be a
combination of material damping, structural damping,
radiation damping and external damping. The material
and structural damping represents the conversion of
mechanical energy into thermal energy while radiation
and external damping represents the radiation of energy
into supporting medium. It has been reported in the
literature that radiation damping can contribute to the
overall damping effect if the conditions are favorable
Damping
Foundation
External
Fluid
Interaction
Internal
Natural
(Structural)
Radiation
Supplemental
Aerodynamic
Hysteretic
Hysteretic
Hydrodynamic
Friction
Friction
Viscous
Viscous
3. IMPORTANCE OF DAMPING
It is widely believed that the structure can survive a scare
of earthquake when the energy absorbing capacity is
greater than the seismic input energy. The seismic energy
imparted is equal to the sum of the kinetic and strain
energy plus the energy dissipated by both hysteretic
65
TECHNICAL PAPER
action of the structural elements and other non-yielding
mechanisms represented by equivalent viscous damping.
The importance of seismic energy imparted and the
structural damage have been discussed in the literature
elsewhere [4]. Zahrah and Hall [4] have observed that
damping has little effect on the amount of seismic energy
imparted; it has the strong influence on the structural
damage. Thus, it is inevitable to use damping as a viable
means of mitigating the structural damage.
4. MODELING OF DAMPING
In any dynamic analysis, mass, stiffness and damping
representations are vital in achieving the correct
response of a structure. Mass and stiffness matrices can
be represented systematically by overall geometry and
material characteristics. However, damping can only be
represented in a phenomenological manner and thus
making the dynamic analysis of structures in a state of
uncertainty. Nevertheless, several investigations have
been done in making the representation of damping in a
simplistic yet logical manner. There is no single universally
accepted methodology for representing damping because
of the nature of the state variables which control damping.
Many traditional identification methods of damping such
as logarithmic decrement method, half-power bandwidth method and the Fourier transform techniques of
response transfer functions are based on linear elastic
vibration theory. These methods have been reported to be
effective in identifying the damping of structures in elastic
range. Damping is often determined by the band width of
the response curve during a sinusoidal steady-state test.
Damping capacity is not a unique value of a structure,
but it depends on the level of excitation. The state-of-theart does not provide a method to determine the damping
capacity based on the material properties and geometrical
characteristics of a structure. The treatment of damping
in computational analyses can be categorized as (1)
phenomenological damping methods in which the actual
physical dissipative mechanisms such as elastic-plastic
hysteresis loss, structural joint friction, or material microcracking are modeled or (2) spectral damping methods,
in which viscous damping is introduced by means of
specified fractions of critical damping.
66
TECHNICAL PAPER
and accuracy. The following section describes the various
damping models used in practice.
...(1)
= structures
Damping in
not viscous; rather it
is actually
[isdue
] = [to
]
[ ]
mechanisms
such as hysteresis in the material
=
and slip in connections. These mechanisms are not well
understood.
[ ] = +Moreover,
[ ] they are difficult to incorporate
and experiment
theory
damping.
viscous
Comparisons
of
=
in most
is sufficiently
accurate
show
approach
that this
=
damping
in+free vibration
tests is shown in Figure
2. The
energy loss per cycle predicted by viscous damping forces
has been comparable to the real structure. The true viscous
damping may also be encountered in hydraulic dashpots
and shock absorbers. Nevertheless, the linear viscous
damping is a property of the computer model and is not
[ ] = [ ]
] [ ]
... (2)
[ ] = thecoefficients
+ [ ] ak (k= 1, 2 p) are obtained
Where
from p
simultaneous equations. K=0,1 yields mass and stiffness
proportional
Alternatively, k=2 yields
respectively.
damping
which
the well
known
Rayleigh
damping
is proportional
From
the
toboth
above
equation, it is
massand stiffness.
=
+
models
damping.
Cauchy
Both
and Wilson-Penzien damping
Time
67
TECHNICAL PAPER
damping which forms damping matrix as the linear combination
of stiffness and mass matrices (spectral damping scheme) is the
most popular choice in many finite element codes. The concept
of Rayleigh damping has evolved through the modal analysis.
Experimental modal analysis is usually performed to determine
the dynamic parameters for prototype structure as well as for
models. Amick and Monteiro (2006) have determined the
modal damping in concrete beams experimentally to identify
the material damping properties of concrete beams [14]. The
modal analysis has been considered to be the most popular
method for solving dynamic problems and is applicable to
linear systems which are undamped in nature. It was reported
that the equation of motion can be uncoupled by satisfying the
orthogonality relationship over the mass and stiffness matrices.
The above statement is valid only for undamped systems.
In order to apply the modal analysis to damped systems, the
proportional damping, a special type of viscous damping is
assumed in order to incorporate the effect of energy dissipation.
Thus, the classical modes have been preserved through the
incorporation of Rayleigh damping [15]. Damping matrices
formed on the basis of modal ratios is known as classical or
proportional damping [16].
The reason for the use of proportional damping is justified
by the following explanation. In the equation of motion, the
coupling of terms usually occurs which are reflected in the
mass and stiffness matrices. Inertia coupling is present when
the mass matrix is non-diagonal and static coupling is present
when the stiffness matrix is non-diagonal. The coupling of the
modes usually can be avoided easily in the case of undamped
free vibration. The same is not true for damped vibration.
Hence in order to represent the equation of motion in uncoupled
form, it is suggested to have a damping matrix proportional
to uncoupled mass and stiffness matrices. Thus, Rayleighs
proportional damping has the specific advantage that the
equation of motion can be uncoupled when it is proportional
to mass and stiffness matrices. On the other hand, the use of
Rayleighs proportional damping in the post yield stage may
not be justified as the tangential stiffness properties are not the
same as initial properties once the structure yields. Thus, the
proportionality is lost after the onset of yielding [16].
In spite of the not very clear rheological meaning, the Rayleigh
damping is the most commonly used approach to represent
damping in the analysis of a structure. Material damping arises
generally due to energy dissipations caused by micro-structural
68
TECHNICAL PAPER
Rayleigh-damping matrix with initial stiffness proportional
damping results in unrealistic damping forces. The error
becomes high when the degree of nonlinearity and the damping
ratio increases. Nevertheless, the results are not significantly
affected when the degree of nonlinearity is low. It is clear that
the collapse capacity of the system is overestimated when the
Rayleigh damping matrix is used with initial stiffness. Thus, the
use of Rayleighs damping has been subjected to scrutiny for its
use in nonlinear range. But its use is justifiable in the nonlinear
range as epitomized in the next section.
4.1.1.2 Rayleigh damping models in non-linear
behavior
In mode superposition method, the damping ratio is defined
for each mode of vibration. However, this is not possible for
non-linear system because non-linear system has no true
vibration modes. Hence, the damping matrix for a non-linear
system is to assume that the damping can be represented as
linear combination of the mass and stiffness matrices of the
linear elastic system. This is justified by the fact that in the
case of non-linear dynamic analysis, the dissipation of energy
through inelastic deformation tends to supersede significantly
the dissipation through viscous damping. Hence, the exact
representation of damping is not as important in a non-linear
system as in the linear system. The control of damping is very
difficult as Rayleigh damping depends on only two parameters.
Modal damping seems to be an alternative and better choice
than Rayleigh damping.
ratio and not from the member sizes. Since damping ratio
=
damping
includes all
sources of damping, the corresponding
matrix formed reflects the complex mechanism in a realistic
=
way
and] is given
as: [ ]
[ ][6]
= [
[ ] = + [ ]
...(3)
segregating each
conveniently
because
of
its
versatility
in
number
be used in the representation of damping.
= of modes
+
of the
the number
of modes is selected on the basis
In general,
=participation
95%
of mass. The amount of damping
can
be set
appropriately by assigning the suitable values of and in the
coefficients and are scalar multipliers can
equation (3). =The
[
] = [ ]
[ ]
be evaluated using
the
following
expression in order to provide
=
a given percentage of critical damping in any two modes of
vibration
[ ] = inan +initial
[ elastic
] stage.
...
(4)
[ ] = [ ] [ ]
= above+expression,
In the
of critical
[ ] xi and xj are the percentage
[damping
] =
+
using
= be calculated
can
mode
the expression
... (5)
69
TECHNICAL PAPER
Total damping
Damping ratio ( )
damping
Passive system
damping
Hysteretic dampers
Auxilliary
damping
system
Circular frequency
Friction dampers
Electro magnetic dampers
Active mass dampers
Active system
Active various stiffness
devices
70
TECHNICAL PAPER
Table 1. Proposed damping values: [BNL NUREG-771742006]
Structure
Operating Basis
Earthquake
(OBE)
Reinforced Concrete
7%
4%
Reinforced Masonry
7%
4%
Prestressed Concrete
5%
3%
4%
3%
---
5%
Habitability*
Natural
Frequency
(rad/s)
Damping
Ratio (%)
Safety**
Natural
Frequency
(rad/s)
30
2.2
2.5
1.9
40
1.7
1.5
1.4
50
1.3
1.2
1.1
60
1.1
1.2
0.93
70
0.95
0.8
0.79
80
0.83
0.8
0.69
90
0.74
0.8
0.62
100
0.67
0.8
0.56
*Frequency for habitability criteria= (1/0.015H)
**Frequency (for Safety) = 1/0.018H
Damping
Ratio(%)
3
2
2
1.5
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.2
6. SUMMARY
References
71
TECHNICAL PAPER
11. Wilson, E.L. and Penzien, J. Evaluation of orthogonal damping matrices,
International Journal of Numerical Methods and Engineering, 1972,
Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5-10.
12. Carr, A.J. (2007). Ruaumoko Manual-Theory, University of Canterbury.
2007,3-14.
13. Duggal, S.K. Earthquake Resistant Design of structures, Oxford Univ.
Press, 2007.
14. Amick, H and Monteiro, J.M. Experimental Determination of Modal
Damping in Concrete Beams, ACI Materials Journal, 2006, Vol. 103,No.
3, pp.153-160.
15. Adhikari, S. Damping models in structural vibration, Dissertation,
Cambridge University, Engineering Department, 2000, 228 pages.
16. Bernal, D. (1994). Viscous damping in inelastic structural response,
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1994,Vol. 120, No.4, pp. 12401254.
17. Florin, T.P. and Sunai, G. Evaluation of damping in dynamic analysis
of structures, International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods
in Applied Sciences, 2010, Vol.2, No. 4 , pp. 124-132.
Muthukumar G. received his B.Tech (Hons.) from SASTRA University; M.E. (civil with specialisation in
structural engineering) from BITS Pilani; pursuing his PhD at BITS Pilani. He is a lecturer in the Civil
Engineering Department at BITS Pilani. His research interests include non-linear finite element analysis,
seismic analysis and design of RC structures, shear wall structures.
Dr. Manoj Kumar holds a B.E. (civil) and M.E. (structures) from University of Roorkee (now IIT Roorkee)
and PhD from IIT Roorkee. He is an Associate Professor and Head of Civil Engineering Department at
BITS Pilani. His research interests include non-linear Finite element analysis of concrete structures, postcracking behavior of concrete bridges and seismic analysis of shear wall structures.
72
SUBSCRIBE
TODAY !
2013
ICJ is posted to all subscribers on the 1st of every month from the
Mumbai Post office.
Kindly add Rs. 360 per year to the final amount, if you want to opt for
Courier service (subject to availability of DTDC courier service in your
area). DTDC courier covers all cities and towns.
Date of Birth: d d
74
m m
y y
8/22/2014 4:27:36 PM
A CD on Earthquake Engineering
An Icj Compilation
One-stop reference on Earthquake Engineering
Useful for civil engineers, structural consultants,
builders, contractors, academicians, students, etc
Contributors include a galaxy of experts in
Earthquake Engineering
More than 40 papers on: Seismic Analysis & Design;
Lessons From Past Earthquakes; Seismic Retrofitting
and Rehabilitation; Seismic Design of Bridges;
Editorial Comments; Capacity Building.
browse pages in
Flipbook format
browse pages in
Flipbook format
To purchase any CD, please pay online at www.icjonline.com or send a cheque / DD of Rs. 600 in favour of 'ACC Limited' to:
The Publication Manager, The Indian Concrete Journal, ACC Limited, L.B.S. Marg, Next to Eternity Mall,
Near Teen Haath Naka, Thane (W) 400 604. Tel: +91(22) 3302 7646 E-mail: info@icjonline.com Website: www.icjonline.com
8/22/2014 2:27:28 PM
8/22/2014 1:59:34 PM