Scribd Logo
Загрузить

Добро пожаловать в Scribd!

  • Dave Darby Greg Kimsey CCC Dismissal 0001

    Загружено:

    MrJonesWM
    94 просмотров2 страницы
    The court dismissed the plaintiff's 53-page criminal complaint against numerous Washington state officers and judges. The complaint alleged that the state actors conspired to deprive the plaintiff of sovereignty and property rights related to denying his request to remove his property from tax rolls based on filing a "land patent." The court found that the complaint had no basis in law or fact, as there is no law allowing private citizens to file criminal complaints or laws governing land patents in the way claimed. The premise that the state is a corporate entity subject to commercial liens was also found to be without merit. The complaint was dismissed.

    Исходное описание:

    Darby

    Оригинальное название

    Dave Darby Greg Kimsey Ccc Dismissal 0001

    Авторское право

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Доступные форматы

    PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd

    Этот документ был вам полезен?

    Это неприемлемый материал?

    Пожаловаться на этот документ
    The court dismissed the plaintiff's 53-page criminal complaint against numerous Washington state officers and judges. The complaint alleged that the state actors conspired to deprive the plaintiff of sovereignty and property rights related to denying his request to remove his property from tax rolls based on filing a "land patent." The court found that the complaint had no basis in law or fact, as there is no law allowing private citizens to file criminal complaints or laws governing land patents in the way claimed. The premise that the state is a corporate entity subject to commercial liens was also found to be without merit. The complaint was dismissed.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    94 просмотров2 страницы

    Dave Darby Greg Kimsey CCC Dismissal 0001

    Загружено:

    MrJonesWM
    The court dismissed the plaintiff's 53-page criminal complaint against numerous Washington state officers and judges. The complaint alleged that the state actors conspired to deprive the plaintiff of sovereignty and property rights related to denying his request to remove his property from tax rolls based on filing a "land patent." The court found that the complaint had no basis in law or fact, as there is no law allowing private citizens to file criminal complaints or laws governing land patents in the way claimed. The premise that the state is a corporate entity subject to commercial liens was also found to be without merit. The complaint was dismissed.

    Авторское право:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Скачайте в формате PDF, TXT или читайте онлайн в Scribd
    Отметить как неприемлемый контент
    из 2

    1

    SupremeCourt. Dkt. 1. Although thecomplaint ismostly incomprehensible, it appears


    Case 3:12-mc-05000-BHS Document 4 Filed02/10/12 Page 1of 2
    2
    3
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASIllNGTON
    AT TACOMA
    4
    5
    6
    DAVIDA. DARBY,
    ORDER DISMISSING
    COMPLAINT
    Plaintiff, CASE NO. 12-MC-5000BHS
    7
    8
    v.
    GREGKIMSEY, et aI.,
    9
    Defendants.
    10
    11
    12
    Thismatter comesbeforetheCourt sua sponte onreviewof Plaintiff DavidA.
    Darby's ("Darby") complaint (Dkt. 1).
    13
    14
    OnJ anuary 4,2012, Darby filedafifty-threepage"criminal" complaint against
    . - . . '.
    numerous Washington Stateofficers andjudges, including.alljustices of theWashington
    . . ," ",
    15
    16
    17 that Darby allegesthat thesestateactorshaveconspired to depriveDarby of his
    18 sovereignty andsovereignproperty rights. Id. Darby filed a"Land Patent" withthe
    19 Clark CountyAuditor, GregKimsey, andrequested that hisproperty beremovedfromthe
    20 tax rolls. Id. at 29. Mr. Kimsey deniedDarby's requests. Id. Darby claims
    21
    22
    $15,600,000.00 indamages asacommercial lienagainst thecorporation Washington
    State. Id. at 50.
    23
    A federal court may dismisssua sponte pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) when
    it isclear that theplaintiff hasnot statedaclaimuponwhich relief may begranted. See
    24
    25
    Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813,F.2d986, 991(9thCir. J 987) ("Su~hadismissal may
    ~.' .., '... _. _ ~tI '
    . .
    26
    bemadewithout notice.wheretheclaimant cannot possibly winrelief.'~);.see also Mallard
    , .' .- ". ! . - " " .-......... ."'" " ,'- ". .
    27
    v. United States Dist. Court, 490U.S. 296, 307-08(1989) (thereislittledoubt afederal
    28
    ORDER - I
    -'
    Case 3:12-mc-05000-BHS Document 4 Filed 02/10/12 Page 2 of 2
    1 court wouldhavethepower to dismiss afrivolous complaint sua sponte, eveninabsence
    2 of anexpress statutory provision). A complaint isfrivolous when it hasno arguablebasis
    3 inlawor fact. Franklin v. Murphy, 745F.2d 1221, 1228(9thCir. 1984).
    4 In this case, Darby's complaint hasnobasis inlawor fact. First, thereisno law
    5 allowingcriminal complaints tobefiledbyprivate citizens or laws governing "land
    6 patents" that wouldremoveone's real property fromstatetaxation. Second, Darby
    7
    8
    9
    cannot possibly winrelief intheformof acommercial lienagainst thestateof
    Washington for itsallegeddenial of his sovereignty. Thebasic premiseof Darby's
    complaint isthat thestateisacorporateentity, which isnot thelawandiswholly without
    10
    11
    12
    merit.
    Therefore, it ishereby ORDERED that Darby's complaint isDISMISSED and
    this caseshall beclosed.
    13
    DATED this 10thday of February, 2012.
    14
    15
    16
    INH. SETTLE
    17
    StatesDistrict J udge
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    ORDER-2

    Вам также может понравиться