Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
The purpose of this report is to design data and communications network for a private high school and
offer a solution for a modern state of the network that meets the technical and business ambitions of
the organisation.
All private schools have unique characteristics such as student population, number of schools, budget
constraints, IT staff, etc. Furthermore, individual schools have very different needs for wireless
connectivity. For example, a research by Alberta Education department (2001) states, a school that
implements a 1:1 computing initiative will have very different connectivity requirements than a
school that simply has a few desktops for labs. As a result, the network has to be specifically
designed to meet the needs.
Moreover, the school wishes to provide all the teachers with their own devices, thus shifting from the
traditional way of providing desktops in staff rooms. This will result in an increase, not only in the
volume of data movement, but also in the types of services and the nature of network traffic. The
network should be up to specifications to adjust to the increasing demand. The network architecture
also has to contain provisions for creating a wireless LAN (WLAN) inside the school premises.
The recommendations for the upgrade are:-
Use equipments that are up to the existing market standards.
Use TCP/IP as the prime protocol.
Establish 10/100 Mbps as standard for all wiring and network devices. Use cables that meet
the 100MBps requirement.
Build a physically secure wiring closet with room to expand and sufficient cooling to remove
heat.
Recognize that multimedia will become increasingly important and pervasive in all fields of
education.
When computers are being purchased, they should meet certain benchmarks
The network should keep the increased traffic in mind as not only will the amount of data
traffic rise substantially, but audio and video data will also become more common as a result
of increase in the number of various AV Teaching aids.
The technology should be flexible enough to adjust to future upgrades in client technology.
Plan for your WAN connections to change in capacity and/or number of access points. Do not
expect that slower speeds can be maintained for years to come.
Monitor Internet traffic.
Physical separation of administrative and student traffic. Filters and other network techniques
can be used for additional security and prioritisation of network traffic.
List of images and tables
Figure 1 Layout of the school4
Table 1 Current bandwidth estimation.. 6
Figure 2 Recommended laboratory planning.7
Table of contents
1. Introduction4
2. Organisational description. 4
2.1. Organisational structure 4
2.2. Physical layout.. 4
2.3. Design Considerations.. 5
3. Current Network Analysis. 5
3.1. Current bandwidth estimation.. 6
4. Description of proposed network.. 6
4.1. Computer lab design and layout... 6
4.1.1. Physical arrangement... 7
4.1.2. Desktop computers and peripherals. 7
4.1.3. Desktop computer choice. 8
4.1.4. Computer displays 8
4.2. Network server8
4.3. Cabling and other infrastructure. 9
4.4. Software.. 9
4.5. Security 9
4.6. Staffing and maintenance10
4.7. WLAN Architecture10
4.7.1. AP Deployment Consideration...10
4.8. School hosted messaging system.11
5. Financial estimates....11
6. Conclusion14
1.Introduction
The aim of this report is to assess the existing data communications network of a private school in
conjunction with its administrative and technical goals and make suitable recommendations to
modernise the network while addressing organisational needs.
2. Organisational description
2.1. Organisational structure
Like all business operations, schools have a set organisational structure with prominent power centres
and clear lines of accountability. The jobs assigned to each individual are well defined and usually
highly specific. Teachers are responsible for the academic functions of the school while
administrators and office workers look after the business and administrative side of the operation.
However, since the primary function of a school is pursuing academia, the main focus of the network
operation has to be facilitating educational operations.
2.2. Physical layout
Figure 1
Most private schools operate in a large building with dedicated rooms for each purpose. The school
presently has two computer laboratories and a library which has 20 desktops each. The school plans to
have three computer labs multimedia, programming and business studies to cater to the needs of
various user communities and reduce congestion of network traffic. Also, the network has to provide
for WLAN connectivity across the total area of the school and in the classrooms. So, the total area
under network connectivity is going to increase radically. Also, as the school looks to increase its
student capacity, it is expected that the school area may also increase in the near future.
2.3. Design Considerations
The network architecture must utilize key technologies that address the safety and security, real-time
connectivity, and multi-service requirements of the modern educational network. The architecture is
to be constructed in a manner that allows these technologies to work seamlessly together.
[CISCO. Schools Network Foundation Deployment Guide].
2.3.1. Network availabilityIn case of an accidental network failure, the system should
be able to adapt to the changed network infrastructure and re-route data immediately. This
will prevent server failures and reduce data congestion.
2.3.2. Single-fabric multi-service As the school plans to move on to a Bring-Your-
Own-Device architecture, the networks should has to provide service to different interfaces
and users. There will be increase in audio-visual communication as well as data
communication. However, the system has to remain under a single hierarchical structure to
increase efficiency and security. This is known as single-fabric multi-service technology.
2.3.3. Prioritisation of traffic The biggest challenge that a multi-service architecture
faces is the prioritisation of the different services and control traffic without data loss. The
network should be able to selectively process requests that have precedence over others.
The overall architecture of the computer network should be able to meet the requirements of future
classroom, meet the market standards of technology and help in creating a better environment for
enhanced and creative experience in the classroom.
3. Current Network Analysis
The following section describes the users as functional groups and outlines the types of applications
used by each group.
a. Administration
The administration uses the computer network for official purposes. The job is less computer-
intensive and more related to the use of peripherals like printers and scanner etc.
b. Teaching staff
At present, the teaching staffs are not regular users of the computer network. However, the
management wants to issue all teachers with laptop/i-pad. This will increase the load on the
network. However, the usage of the network by the teachers is expected to be more personal
in nature and so will not cause major traffic congestion.
c. Students
i. Multimedia/programming students they form a major chunk of users and
the work is more computer-intensive. They are the majority contributor to the
network traffic.
ii. Business students they are also regular users of the computer network,
using it from empty stations in the computer laboratories or from the library.
There work is less demanding on the network traffic, but still forms a major
chunk of the data transferred. The management plans to install a new
laboratory for the purpose of business studies, which is expected to increase
the workload of the computer network.
3.1 Current Bandwidth estimation
Labs
Staff
(2 labs + library) x
30
60 No. of staff
computers
30
Bandwidth (Kbps)
(calculated per
student)
56
Bandwidth
(Kbps)
(calculated per
staff member)
56
Percentage of
computers on LAN
concurrently in the
lab
100%
Percentage of
teaching staff
on LAN
50%
Bandwidth of cache
server
20%
Bandwidth
saved by cache
server as a
percentage
35%
Lab bandwidth
(Kbps)
3528 Staff
bandwidth
(Kbps)
294
Table 1
4. Description of proposed network
4.1 Computer lab design and layout
The computer labs will be comprised of 30 computers, 1 of which will be a dedicated instructors
station, and 2 dedicated computers to be used for scanning, digital camera use, and other multimedia
operations. The room will be also include a Smart board with integrated LCD, flatbed scanner, digital
camera, 2 networked laser printers and 2 networked colour inkjet printers. The same arrangement
shall be used in the library.
4.1.1 Physical arrangement
All the computers in the laboratories and the library will be arranged in the traditional or classic
computer lab model. This layout provides several advantages for classroom management and
control.
Advantages and drawbacks:-
a. It allows the teacher to observe all students and to judge whether they are actively
engaged. This typical design resembles a traditional classroom so students are more
likely to stay engaged.
b. A major drawback associated with this arrangement is the increase in commotion
and confusion created by the irregular movement of the students in a classroom.
This problem is countered if classes traditionally enter and exit as a group.
c. Maintenance can also be a problem as access to equipments in the middle of row is
hindered by other students and equipment on the periphery.
d. This system is also best used for individual or pairs of students rather than groups.
So, it meets the requirements of the school.
The labs will be arranged in rows as follows 2 tables against each wall each table will seat 2
students there will be four columns on each side as shown in the diagram below. These tables are
adjustable and will also help to meet the requirements of my Special needs students. The labs are
carpeted in the seating areas and this will reduce the noise generated from chairs moving around on
the floor. This will help enhancing the study environment of the laboratory.
Figure 2
4.1.2 Desktop Computers and Peripherals :
Desktops are most suited to a schools requirement as they are cheap, easy to upgrade and can be
maintained easily. Since the school laboratories, will be generally used for educational and classroom
purposes, privacy is not a problem.
Printers 1 laser 1 inkjet
Printers 1 laser 1 inkjet
SMARTBOARD
With integrated
LCD
Teacher
Station
MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER
Scanner
MULTIMEDIA COMPUTER
Digital Camera
4.1.3 Desktop Computer Choice
With these suggestions in mind, mid-level Dell desktop computers are recommended. Assuming the
average class size is 28. This provides each student with a computer, one teacher work station and two
dedicated multimedia computers. Windows based systems for the following reasons:-
Ease of operation and compatibility
Number of available applications
Ease of upgrades ( Terrill, 2006 p.26)
Dell Optiplex 780 computer
Reasons for Choosing this Desktop:
Warranty: 3 year onsite warranty
Windows 7 Professional
Intel Pentium Processor
4 GB Memory; Hard Drive 160 GB
Network Protection: Intel