Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
It is declared that all the materials in this report are the result of my own work
and all materials which are not the result of my own work have been clearly
acknowledged in this report.
Signed:.
Date:.
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All praises to Allah, unto im belongs all the knowledge and understanding. I would
like to acknowledge and e!tend my heartily gratitude to the following people
without whom the completion of this research would not have been possible. I wish
to e!press my appreciation and thankfulness to my supervisor, Dr. "idad Ismail who
was very helpful and offered invaluable advice, support and guidance# not forgetting
my initial supervisor, Dr. $andeep Singh for his encouragement and advice that
motivated me to take up this research. $y appreciation to my manager, %im &ok
&eong, who shares the same admiration for knowledge and 'technology(# for his
persistent support in all my works. I would also like to convey thanks to Agilent
)echnologies for funding the materials in this research. )o my colleagues %aw *oon
"an, )oh +hee %eng and Ahmad elmi $okhtar for their relentless help and
technical contribution, let me e!press my sincere gratitude. I wish to e!press my
love and gratitude to my beloved wife, Alhan ,arhanah, my children and family# for
their understanding and sacrifice, throughout the duration of my study. I thank you
to all of you and indeed Allah is the best for reward and the best for the final end.
iii
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF A 3.6 GHZ DIELECTRIC RESONATOR
OSCILLATOR WITH WIDE TUNING SENSITIVITY
ABSTRACT
An oscillator is re-uired as a second stage %. in a superheterodyne SA. )he
oscillator operating fre-uency is a fi!ed /.0 12, which is at the lower end of the
microwave fre-uency range. )here are several options of active devices and
resonators that can be considered for the oscillator. A bipolar 3unction transistor
4*5)6 is chosen for the amplifier block due to its low flicker noise corner fre-uency
and a dielectric resonator 4D76 is chosen for its high 8 factor. )his combination
yields a low phase noise oscillator. Apart from its high 8 factor, a D7 is a high
dielectric constant ceramic thus enabling a miniaturi2ed microwave oscillator design
compared to a cavity resonator. A varactor9tuned techni-ue is adopted because it
results in a simple planar circuit design compared to optically and magnetically tune
D7. )his dielectric resonator oscillator 4D7.6 must have very high fre-uency
accuracy. )he SA is specified to operate from :+ to ;;+, thus among the design
re-uirement for the D7. is to be operable in a wide temperature range and, to last
for many, many years. ence the D7. is controlled by a phase9locked loop 4<%%6.
As the D7. signal drifts with temperature as well as due to aging, a wide tuning
range is necessary to guarantee a reliable and repeatable performance over its
operating life.
An e!isting D7. with a tuning range of :.=>? at of /.0 12 was used as a
benchmark. )he development of the new D7. began with investigation on several
proposed varactor9tuned D7 resonant structures. )he resonant structures were
observed for the resonant fre-uency tuning range, the linearity of resonant
fre-uencies versus tuning voltages and the tuning sensitivity. )he promising D7
resonant structures @ with wide tuning range, linear response and high tuning
sensitivity, were further analy2ed to understand the resonant structures coupling
mechanism as well as the potential effect on the D7. performance like phase noise.
)he successful D7 resonant structure combined with the *5) amplifier circuit
formed the D7.. )he first D7. is a positive feedback oscillator# however due to the
resonant structure high insertion loss compared with the available amplifier gain, the
D7. failed to work. An alternative negative resistance oscillator was then
iv
developed, also using the same model *5). It worked based on signal reflection
between the resonant structure port and the *5) emitter 3unction which posed a
negative real impedance# it proved successful. )he newly developed negative
resistance D7. performance was measured and compared with the benchmark
D7.. )he new D7. yields a tuning range of A/ $2 or :.0;? at /.0 12 and a
tuning sensitivity of A./ $2BC. owever, the new D7. phase noise degraded by
about =: d* compared with the benchmark D7..
v
TABLE OF CONTENTS
A+&D."%ED1E$ED)S.......................................................................................iii
A*S)7A+)...............................................................................................................iv
)able of +ontents........................................................................................................vi
%IS) ., ,I1F7ES....................................................................................................i!
%IS) ., )A*%ES......................................................................................................!i
%IS) ., SG$*.%S.................................................................................................!ii
A**7ECIA)I.DS...................................................................................................!iv
= ID)7.DF+)I.D.............................................................................................=;
=.= $otivation @ A igh )uning Sensitivity Second Down9+onverter %ocal
.scillator................................................................................................................=;
=.A 7esearch <roblem Statement.......................................................................=;
=./ 7esearch .b3ectives....................................................................................=0
=.> 7esearch Scope and %imitations.................................................................=H
=.; 7esearch +ontribution.................................................................................=I
=.0 )hesis .rgani2ation.....................................................................................=I
A %I)E7A)F7ES 7ECIE"................................................................................A:
A.= $icrowave ,re-uencies Sources.................................................................A:
A.A Active Device +onsideration for .scillator................................................A=
A./ igh 89factor 7esonator.............................................................................A/
A.> Dielectric "aveguide as a $icrowave 7esonator.......................................A>
A.; Discussion on D7 tuning techni-ues prior works.......................................A;
A.0 Summary.....................................................................................................A0
/ $E).D.%.1G............................................................................................AJ
/.= Dielectric 7esonator .scillator Specification.............................................AJ
/.A Development ,lowchart............................................................................../:
vi
/./ Dielectric 7esonator..................................................................................../=
/./.= 7esonant $ode..................................................................................../=
/.> 7esonance Structure +onstruction..............................................................//
/.>.= $etal Enclosure Effect on 7esonant $ode and ,re-uency................./>
/.>.A D7 +oupling to $icrostrip................................................................../H
/.>./ $echanical Ad3ustment of 7esonant ,re-uency................................./J
/.>.> Electronic )uning Element @ Caractor.................................................>:
/.>.; $icrostrip Stub +oupled Caractor )uning @ )unable 7esonant +ircuit
>/
/.; Summary.....................................................................................................>0
> 7ESF%)S ADD DIS+FSSI.D........................................................................>H
>.= Amplifier $atching for 1ain and .pen %oop <hase Shift.........................>H
>.=.= <hase Doise..........................................................................................;=
>.=.A )unable 7esonance Structure +oupling to Amplifier *lock...............;/
>.=./ Signal +oupling to .utput...................................................................;>
>.A Initial D7. <erformance............................................................................;0
>.A.= ,undamental ,re-uency and )uning Sensitivity.................................;0
>.A.A <ower K armonics.............................................................................;I
>.A./ <hase Doise..........................................................................................0:
>./ Summary.....................................................................................................0=
; +.D+%FSI.D ADD ,F)F7E ".7&S........................................................0A
;.= +onclusion on the igh &
C
and "ide )uning 7ange D7. Design............0A
;.A ,uture "ork on the igh &
C
D7...............................................................0/
;.A.= <hase Doise Improvement...................................................................0/
;.A.A ,urther &
C
or )uning 7ange Improvement for +ost 7eduction
.pportunity........................................................................................................0>
7E,E7ED+ES..........................................................................................................0;
A<<EDDIL A............................................................................................................HA
vii
A<<EDDIL *............................................................................................................H/
A<<EDDIL +............................................................................................................H>
A<<EDDIL D............................................................................................................H;
A<<EDDIL E............................................................................................................H0
%IS) ., <F*%I+A)I.DS.......................................................................................HH
viii
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
,igure A.=: 8 factors of some resonators used in microwave fre-uency circuits
MA0, AI, AJ, //9/0N.............................................................................................A>
,igure /.=: A cylindrical D7 with )E
:=O
mode, 4b6 top view and 4c6 side view, in the
case where % P .D M>/N...................................................................................../A
,igure /.A: 4a6 $icrostrip, )E$ mode M0>N# 4b6 dielectric resonator )E
:=
resonant
mode coupling to microstrip )E$ mode#
A
QQ
=
............................................/H
,igure /./: Electrical e-uivalent schematic circuit of the dielectric resonator
coupling to a microstrip line............................................................................../I
,igure /.>: Initial stage breadboard circuit developed to characteri2e microstrip lines
coupling to the dielectric resonator, dotted lines are indicating ma!imum 9
field coupling points........................................................................................../J
,igure /.;: Simplified assembly of the D7 resonant structure..................................>:
,igure /.0: **I;H diode capacitance 4+
)
6 at = $2 versus the reverse voltage
applied or the v
tune
, taken from the datasheet M0IN..............................................>=
,igure /.H: ADS model of packaged **I;H constructed from its S<I+E model and
package model...................................................................................................>A
,igure /.I: Simulation of packaged **I;H in ADS and E$DS at = $2...............>>
,igure /.J: )unable resonant circuit assembly..........................................................>0
,igure /.=:: <lot of the tunable resonant circuit simulated and measured
transmission response 4S
A=
6................................................................................>H
,igure >.=: %ayout of the amplifier circuit, the schematic is in A<<EDDIL D........>J
,igure >.A: )he amplifier gain and phase shift measurement setup..........................>J
,igure >./: )he amplifier gain, the markers are showing the gain at /.0 12..........;:
,igure >.>: )he amplifier phase shift, the markers are phase shifts at /.0 12........;=
,igure >.;: Simulated and measured noise figure of the designed amplifier............;A
,igure >.0: )he amplifier noise figure measurement setup.......................................;A
,igure >.H: <redicted phase noise for the designed oscillator....................................;/
,igure >.I: $easured response of the resonant structure described in section /.>.;.;>
,igure >.J: +omplete oscillator circuit resting in bottom enclosure..........................;;
,igure >.=:: .scillator signal coupling to the output................................................;H
i!
,igure >.==: Spectrum measurement set up...............................................................;H
,igure >.=A: D7. center fre-uency reading.............................................................;I
,igure >.=/: )he positive feedback D7. f
:
versus v
tune
.............................................;J
,igure >.=>: ,re-uency spectrum of the dielectric resonator oscillator....................0:
,igure >.=;: <hase noise measurement using Agilent E;:;A* signal source analy2er
...........................................................................................................................0=
,igure >.=0: Dielectric resonator oscillator phase noise, measured and simulated.. .0A
!
LIST OF TABLES
Page
)able A.=: Summary of prior works that achieved wide tuning bandwidth...............AH
)able /.=: Specification of the D7...........................................................................AJ
)able /.A: .verview of ceramic materials available for the dielectric resonator....../=
)able /./: .ff9the9shelf metal enclosure dimensions................................................/>
)able /.>: +alculated waveguide resonant wavelength,
d
BA for available materials
M/0N...................................................................................................................../;
)able /.;: Electrical properties of >;:: series dielectric resonator fabricated for this
design, based on the manufacturer measurement............................................../0
)able /.0: ,abricated dielectric resonator physical dimensions................................/0
)able >.=: Antenna9waveguide structure simulation and measurement data.............;0
!i
LIST OF SYMBOLS
7eflection coefficient
+
7esonant fre-uency in radian
d
1uide wavelength
r
Dielectric constant
=Bf ,licker noise
+
res
Dielectric resonator e-uivalent capacitance
+
)
Caractor capacitance
, Doise figure
Electric field
$agnetic field
transverse electric 4)E6 mode does not contain electric field in the 29a!is direction#
the first two subscripts, namely the ':( and '=( describe the standing wave 4half9
sinusoid6 pattern in circumferential, and radial, directions respectively# and the
third subscript, '(, given by
= A <
d
L 3.0
denotes the fact that there is no complete half9sinusoid pattern within the D7 in 29
a!is direction 4refer to ,igure / .A 4a66 as oppose to circular metallic cavity
resonators. ,or the D7 to resonate in )E
:=
mode , the ratio of its outer diameter, .D
to its thickness or height, % must be such that,
>A . = >
L
OD
3.3
and specifically the ratio must be kept
// . / A < <
L
OD
3.4
to minimise interference of spurious modes .
3.4 Re($a$*e S!.'*!'.e C$(!.'*!"$
)he design begins with the analysis of the D7 passive resonant structure. )he
resonant structure includes the electrical circuit as well as the metal enclosure as
shown in . )he metal enclosure is to provide shielding. )he resonant structure
electrical e-uivalent circuit is analogous to a single order band9pass filter, with the
D7 as the filter element coupled to transmission lines as the input and output ports.
<recisely, the resonant structure is three9dimensional and apart from the D7, the
varactor, the metal tuning disc and the metal enclosure would affect the resonant
fre-uency. )he varactor coupling to the D7 will be discussed in details in section
/.>.;.
Secondly, the cost constraint imposed on the design compels the use of 'off9the9
shelf( metal enclosure and the incorporated metal tuning disc, resonator assembly @
plastic screw and ceramic support which are leveraged from another circuit
4operating at different fre-uency6.
/A
3.4.1 Me!a/ E$*/('.e E99e*! $ Re($a$! M+e a$+ F.e8'e$*)
+ohn suggested that the enclosure must be appro!imately twice the biggest
dimension of the D7 so as not to degrade its 8
F
resulting from the current induced
on the enclosure surface by the e!ternal field of the D7# and that this e!ternal field
disturbance also changes the resonant fre-uency . Alternatively, )rans9)ech
recommends the enclosure si2e to be three times the D7 si2e, i.e. 4with reference to
6, the enclosure height is,
L L L L /
A =
+ + 3.6
"here %
=
is the distance from the ground plane on bottom enclosure to the bottom
of the D7# % is the D7 height and %
A
is the distance from the top of the D7 to the top
enclosure#
and the enclosure length or width,
( ) OD W /
3.6.
)he 'off9the9shelf( metal enclosure dimensions are shown in )able / .>. )he D7
<+* is resting on the bottom enclosure# and another <+* 4containing the rest of
circuitry6 about 0: mils thick 4:.H0A mm6 is sandwiched between the top and bottom
enclosure, so the total height, 4
A =
L L L + +
6 of the enclosure is appro!imately =>.A
mm.
Ta1/e 3.4; .ff9the9shelf metal enclosure dimensions
Dimension *ottom enclosure )op enclosure
"idth /A./0 mm
%ength /H.JH mm
eight >./; mm J.:J mm
1iven the enclosure total height and length, in order to minimi2e unloaded 8
degradation, from E-uation / .; the ma!imum height of the D7 would be,
mm L H// . > / A:: . =>
ma!
. listed the available dielectric materials and the
//
calculated guide wavelength at /.0 12. )he material that gives the guide
wavelength closest to %
ma!
will be selected for the research. ,rom E-uation /.0 the
ma!imum outer diameter would be,
mm OD 0;H . =A / JH: . /H
ma!
.
Ta1/e 3.6; +alculated waveguide resonant wavelength,
d
BA for available materials .
$aterial
r
A B
d
4mm6
AJ:: Series /: H.0:A
IH:: Series /: H.0:A
/;:: Series /; H.:/I
I/:: Series /0 0.J>:
>/:: Series >/ 0./;:
>;:: Series >; 0.A:H
"ith all the re-uirements presented above#
i. the enclosure total dimensions,
ii. calculated ma!imum resonator length or height 4%
ma!
6,
iii. the resonant wavelengths in the available materials as shown in ,
iv. conditions stated in E-uations / ./ and / .> for operation at /.0
12,
the >;:: Series material, which is made of 2irconium titanate based ceramic is
selected for this design because with its highest dielectric constant,
r
S >;, it is
e!pected to yield the smallest dimensions D7 that can satisfy the re-uirements i @ iv
above. )he >;:: series electrical properties are shown in . )he enclosure dimensions
and the selected material information are feedback to the manufacturer to fabricate
D7.
Ta1/e 3.6; Electrical properties of >;:: series dielectric resonator fabricated for this
design, based on the manufacturer measurement.
Dielectric constant,
r
>;.H t =.;
Fnloaded 8, 8
F
Q I::: at Z /.; 12
)emperature coefficient of resonant fre-uency
T/ <<$B+ t = <<$B+
)he D7 manufacturer, )rans9)ech specifies accuracy within t =I $2 from f
+
. )he
final D7 dimensions were arrived at after two iterations of samples# the first D7
sample has a height about 0.>HH mm @ the initial D7 si2e is calculated by the
/>
manufacturer based on our application, i.e. the desired f
+
, enclosure si2e. )he sample
was assembled in the resonant structure shown in and the resonant fre-uency, f
+
was
measured. If the resonant fre-uency is not within /.0:: 12 t =I $2 target and
knowing how much it is off target, the ne!t sample is re-uested with according
dimensions ad3ustment. )he iteration continues until the resonant fre-uency is
within the target. )he final fabricated D7 dimensions are shown in )able / .H# this
yields a nominal f
+
of /.0:: 12 t =I $2 when the resonant structure is
measured.
Ta1/e 3.=; ,abricated dielectric resonator physical dimensions.
.uter diameter, .D 4mm6
=>.JI0 t :.:A;
Inner diameter, ID 4mm6 /.JII T :.A:/ B 9:.:::
eight, % 4mm6 ;.0=/ nominal
Dote that the D7 height is 3ust ;.0=/ mm, compared to calculated resonant
wavelength listed in , i.e. 0.A:H mm. ,rom E-uation /.A, this gives a figure of
:.J:>. )he discussion in this section shows the significant influence of the metal
enclosure on the D7 dimensions and hence the resonant mode as well as the
resonant fre-uency. 1iven the metal enclosure dimensions as the constraint, the D7
fabrication has to be tailored around this constraint.
3.4.0 DR C'5/"$g ! M"*.(!."5
)he signal propagates in microstrip transmission line in almost )E$ mode,
where the electric field 4E9field6 and the 9field are orthogonal to each other and to
the direction of signal propagation. As mentioned in Section /./.=, the D7 is e!cited
in )E
:=
where the 9field outside the D7 bears a resemblance to the like of a!ial
magnetic dipole, refer to ,igure / .A 4c6. )his fundamental resonant mode is adopted
in many works and researches .
"hen a D7 e!cited in )E
:=
is placed in close pro!imity to a microstrip line, a signal
whose fre-uency is the same as the D7 resonant fre-uency 4in )E
:=
mode6 can be
coupled from the microstrip line to the D7 via the 9field as shown in ,igure / ./
4b6.
/;
[[[[[[[[ E9field# 999999999999 9field
4a6 4b6
F"g'.e 3.3; 4a6 $icrostrip, )E$ mode # 4b6 dielectric resonator )E
:=
resonant mode
coupling to microstrip )E$ mode#
A
QQ
=
<o2ar defines the D7 electrical e-uivalent circuit as a resistor, 7
res
an
inductor, %
res
and a capacitor, +
res
in parallel, refer to ,igure / .>. Since it is a 9
field coupling between the D7 and the microstrip line with characteristic impedance,
\
:
, the D7 appears as a series load, \
D
on the microstrip line :
( )
C C U
res
D
f f f Q f
R N
Z
+
A =
A
3.=
"here D is the coupling coefficient#
7
res
is the e-uivalent resistance in the D7#
8
F
is the unloaded 8#
f is a fre-uency and
f
+
is the D7 resonant fre-uency 4)E
:=
6.
,igure / .; shows the breadboard circuit developed @ center microstrip and
the D7, for schematic in ,igure / .> 4ignore the varactor coupling at the moment6.
)he distance from the a!is of the D7 4solid, vertical line6 to the 4middle of6
microstrip line determines the magnitude of signal being coupled over, i.e. the
coupling coefficient, D. )he microstrip length from the dotted line point 4tangential
to the D76 to its open9end is -uarter wavelength 4B>6 at /.0 12 in order to
ma!imi2e the 9field at that point . "hen coupled to a second microstrip line the
circuit is identical to a single order band9pass filter.
/0
A
F"g'.e 3.4; Electrical e-uivalent schematic circuit of the dielectric resonator
coupling to a microstrip line.
F"g'.e 3.6; Initial stage breadboard circuit developed to characteri2e microstrip
lines coupling to the dielectric resonator, dotted lines are indicating ma!imum 9
field coupling points.
3.4.3 Me*&a$"*a/ A+3'(!2e$! 9 Re($a$! F.e8'e$*)
Fp to this point, the basic resonant structure for use in this work has been
defined, i.e. the metal enclosure, D7 working at /.0 12 in )E
:=
resonant mode and
how the signal will be coupled to the output via microstrip lines.
A metallic tuning disc is introduced in combination with the D7 for one ma3or
reason. 7ealistically materials have variation from one to the other, including the
D7s. )he variation could come from ingredients inconsistency from one batch to the
/H
other and machining accuracy limitation, to name a few. )hus, the D7 is
manufactured such that its natural resonant fre-uency falls within certain tolerance
from specified nominal fre-uency. Some sort of compensation is re-uired to cater
for this material variation.
A metal tuning disc is placed above the D7, i.e. screwed in to the top of the
metal enclosure, with the tuning disc position in vertical 429a!is6 a!is ad3ustable. )he
tolerance in the D7 resonant fre-uency is compensated by ad3usting the distance
between the tuning disc and the D7, namely %
A
in . )his is done manually by turning
the metal disc screw top. "hen the metal tuning disc is moved towards the D7, the
resonant fre-uency varies proportional to the stored magnetic and electric energies
of the displaced volume .
F"g'.e 3.6; Simplified assembly of the D7 resonant structure
)he mounting of the D7 on a ceramic support on top of the laminate or the
<+* is to give reasonable distance from the metal enclosure, i.e. the distances %
=
and %
A
. Although this is insufficient due to the small enclosure height and will
potentially degrade some performance aspects of the D7. like phase noise , it is a
compromise given the available metal enclosures.
3.4.4 E/e*!.$"* T'$"$g E/e2e$! % Va.a*!.
A varactor diode is introduced into the D7 circuit as the electronic tuning
element to ad3ust the fre-uency. )he oscillator <%% uses the tuning element to ad3ust
/I
.D
%
A
%
D7
%
=
support
$etal enclosure
4grounded6
$etal tuning disc
$icrowave laminate
Screw top
"
the phase and fre-uency of the oscillator. )his D7. application as a local oscillator
4%.6 means it is a fi!ed fre-uency oscillator. )he <%% is to maintain accurately the
output signal fre-uency whereby the oscillator fre-uency drifts due to temperature
fluctuation and the devices aging.
As for free running oscillator, any varactor with high capacitance ratio seems
reasonable, regardless of the tuning linearity. owever, when considering
incorporating a <%% for the oscillator control system, tuning linearity has significant
effect on the loop filter or the loop controller. ,urthermore, since this D7. is a fi!ed
fre-uency application with a relatively narrow tuning bandwidth compared to
voltage controlled oscillators 4C+.(s6, it would be redundant to have a comple!
<%%, i.e. with selectable loop controller response to cater for different tuning
sensitivity. Dote that the tuning linearity or sensitivity 4&
C
, unit 2BC6 here is the
slope of the fre-uency against varactor tuning voltage 4v
tune
6 plot.
3.4.4.1 BB>6= Va.a*!. ADS 2+e/
**I;H, a silicon hyperabrupt varactor from Infineon )echnologies is
adopted for this D7. design. Its small profile S+DI: package means it has very
low parasitic elements# A<<EDDIL * shows the electrical e-uivalent circuit of the
package. ,igure / .H shows the capacitance range from v
tune
S = C to about AI C #
the tuning voltage specified for the D7. is from : C @ =: C. **I;H S<I+E chip
model and its package model as shown in ,igure / .I, are used to simulate the
capacitance at : C @ =: C v
tune
and characteri2e the varactor. )he chip S<I+E model
can be referred in A<<EDDIL A. Since the model will be used in the circuit design
and simulation, the **I;H packaged model was simulated upfront in circuit
simulator Agilent Advanced Design System 4ADS6. Fsing ADS model which allows
the variation of the reverse9biased voltage, i.e. v
tune
, the capacitance of the varactor at
a particular biased voltage can be deduced accurately.
/J
F"g'.e 3.=; **I;H diode capacitance 4+
)
6 at = $2 versus the reverse voltage
applied or the v
tune
, taken from the datasheet .
F"g'.e 3.>; ADS model of packaged **I;H constructed from its S<I+E model and
package model.
S9parameters simulation was carried out in ADS# **I;H anode is grounded
and the cathode is D+ coupled to a tunable voltage source @ to emulate the tuning
voltage i.e. the reverse9biased voltage# and A+ coupled to S9parameter ;:
termination port. )he fre-uency is set at = $2 following the datasheet plot in
>:
,igure / .H. )he S== data is plotted on the impedance chart 4Smith +hart6 for every
v
tune
from : C @ =: C at = C interval. )he capacitance at each v
tune
is derived from
( ) ( ) Im A =
C
Z F C
, where F is = $2 and \
+
4Im6 is the varactor reactance at =
$2. )he ADS simulation result of the packaged **I;H is showed in ,igure / .J.
)he simulation shows the **I;H capacitance is in good agreement with the
datasheet plot in ,igure / .H. )he data for ADS and E$DS simulations are listed in
A<<EDDIL +.
3.4.4.0 BB>6= EMDS 2+e/
E$DS is an electromagnetic field simulator for two and three dimensional
passive structures. )he D7 resonant circuit involves many three dimensional
structures like the resonator itself, the ceramic support, the metal enclosure, the
tuning disc besides the planar microstrip transmission lines. .f all the above, only
the microstrips and the varactor can be readily modeled in ADS circuit simulator.
)he three dimensional structures are rather complicated to model accurately in ADS,
one main reason is because of the three dimensional electromagnetic field
interaction among the structures of different electrical properties, which is definitely
inade-uate to 3ust model their coupling using transformers or baluns. ence the
application of E$DS simulator, inadvertently the varactor which is part of the three
dimensional tunable resonant circuit has to be modeled in E$DS too.
Since E$DS only support passive electrical structures, the varactor which
re-uires biasing, has to be modeled as a passive capacitor somehow. ,rom the ADS
result, the capacitance value at a particular biased voltage is known. Secondly, for a
passive capacitor, its capacitance depends on its dielectric material i.e. the dielectric
constant,
r
. )hus, and by keeping other capacitance variables 4surface area and
distance between the metal plates6 constant, to emulate the varactor capacitance at a
particular biased voltage, its dielectric constant is set to achieve the desired
capacitance @ setting the dielectric constant can be done in E$DS when defining the
properties of a material. owever this method is not so straight forward. )he E$DS
simulations are swept at = $2 since capacitances obtained from ADS are also
swept at = $2, following the reference data from the datasheet 4,igure / .H6. )he
E$DS results are displayed as impedance on a Smith chart, the capacitance 4+6 is
>=
obtained from
( )
C
Z C
0
=: = A =
where \
+
is the impedance at = $2
displayed on the Smith +hart. *y iteration, the dielectric constant is ad3usted until
the capacitance e-uivalent to a particular biased voltage is achieved. In ,igure / .J
the E$DS results are obtained this way, where the !9a!is would be the 'v
tune
e-uivalent dielectric constant(.
F"g'.e 3.?; Simulation of packaged **I;H in ADS and E$DS at = $2
3.4.6 M"*.(!."5 S!'1 C'5/e+ Va.a*!. T'$"$g % T'$a1/e Re($a$!
C".*'"!
)he varactor must be coupled to the D7 such that variation in the varactor
capacitance will vary the energy stored in the reactance of the resonant circuit. )he
change of the resonant fre-uency either by mechanical tuning, as described in
section /.>./, or by varactor tuning, is due to the fact that the fringing field outside
the D7 is being perturbed by the tuning . A simple techni-ue to achieve this is by
placing the varactor at one end of a stub, located at the vicinity of the D7, as
described in these papers . )he initial resonance structure employs a circular tuning
stub of half9wavelength long and ;: characteristic impedance at /.0 12. )he
radius of the stub was determined empirically. Appro!imately, the resonant
fre-uency, f
+
(
of this tunable resonant circuit is described by :
>A
( )
,
_
+
+
res T
T res
C C
L L N
C C N
f f
B =
B =
A
A
A
A
U
3.>
"here f
+
is the D7 resonant fre-uency#
D is the coupling coefficient between the D7 and varactor#
+
res
is the D7 e-uivalent capacitance#
+
)
is the varactor capacitance#
%
res
is the D7 e-uivalent inductance and
%
)
is the tuning stub inductance.
"ith the varactor capacitance set at a value e-uivalent to 'v
tune
of ; C(, the tunable
resonant circuit was simulated in E$DS for the transmission response 4S
A=
6, the plot
is shown in ,igure / .==, the resonant fre-uency is at /.0=I;A 12.
,or this simulation, 8
%
of the resonant circuit with a load of ;: is,
( )
;;H/ . 0J:
=: 0=;II . / 0A==A . /
=: 0=I;A . /
J
J
/ /
dB low dB up
O
L
f f
f
Q
and the predicted resonator half bandwidth is:
MH:
Q
f
L
O
0A . A
;;H/ . 0J: A
=: 0=I;A . /
A
J
.
*ased on the transmission response measurement, of which the result is also plotted
in ,igure / .==, the actual resonant circuit 8
%
and half bandwidth are /;:.H/;H and
;.=/ $2 respectively. )he difference between the simulated and measured values
is due to some components which were omitted in the simulation to reduce
processing comple!ity. )hese components such as the S$A connectors, the plastic
screw that locks the D7 in position 4refer to ,igure / .=: 4b66 contribute some losses
and degrade the overall resonant structure 8 factor. Secondly, in actual the varactor
8 factor which is lower than the D7 limits the overall resonant structure 8 factor
and was also not included in the simulation.
)he complete resonant circuit is shown in ,igure / .=: with different assembly
levels to show all the details. ,igure / .=: 4a6, without the D7, showing the half9
wavelength tuning stub and the varactor# ,igure / .=: 4b6 with the D7 assembly,
both coupling microstrips are tangential to the D7 at the ma!imum coupling point
which is -uarter9wavelength 4B>6 from the microstrips open end. ,igure / .=: 4c6
showing top view of the complete tunable resonant circuit assembly# note the screw
>/
slot for the tuning disc ad3ustment @ to tune the resonant fre-uency # and ,igure / .
=: 4d6 showing the tuning disc inside the top enclosure which is on the same vertical
a!is with the D7. )he blue wire is to connect to a voltage source for the varactor
bias.
4a6 4b6
4c6 4d6
F"g'.e 3.1@; )unable resonant circuit assembly
>>
)uning stub
Caractor
B>
Dielectric
resonator
Screw slot
)uning disc
<lastic
screw
F"g'.e 3.11; <lot of the tunable resonant circuit simulated and measured
transmission response 4S
A=
6
3.6 S'22a.)
)he critical components for the oscillator have been characteri2ed and the
fundamentals behind the design were clearly described. )he D7 and the varactor
were assembled into the resonant structure together with the microstrip as the
coupling structure. )he D7 in the resonant structure is tunable about /.0 12 and
the structure yields a 8
%
of about 0J:. A gain block for the positive feedback
oscillator as well as the negative resistance source have been designed.
>;
CHAPTER 4
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
A reference D7. simulations and characteri2ation will be presented in the early
sections in this chapter. A fully functioning D7. indicates that the methodology
used in designing the D7. is sound and realistic. )he research will then proceed to
find a resonant structure that will yield higher &
C
and to understand the mechanism
that yields such a high &
C
. A new D7. will be developed based on the incumbent
resonant structure.
4.1 A25/"9"e. Ma!*&"$g 9. Ga"$ a$+ O5e$ L5 P&a(e S&"9!
,igure > .=A shows the geometry of the transmission lines at the input and
output of the transistor optimi2ed for 1
A
. )he gain measurement setup to measure
1
A
is shown in # the vector network analy2er 4model Agilent D;A/:A6 measures the
amplifier S9parameters. )he transistor <
=d*
is about A: d*m at /.0 12, so to avoid
the amplifier operating in saturation, the stimulus signal from the network analy2er
DA is set to : d*m 4or lower6. )he S9parameter simulation on the amplifier design
4refer to A<<EDDIL D for the complete schematic6 predicts 1
A
of H.:/ d* at /.0
12, as plotted in ,igure > .=>, together with the actual measured 1
A
which is
about =.0 d* lower. Difference between the simulated and measured 1
A
is e!pected#
in simulation loss or mismatch due to the S$A connections is unaccounted for, as
well as board fabrication imperfection @ notice in ,igure > .=A, there are grooves
along the microstrip edges because of over milling. )he grooves e!aggerate the stray
E9field resulting in deviation from the microstrip -uasi9)E$ characteristic. )he
actual *5) also may have lower current gain, than that applied in the simulation.
>0
F"g'.e 4.10; %ayout of the amplifier circuit, the schematic is in A<<EDDIL D.
F"g'.e 4.13; )he amplifier gain and phase shift measurement setup.
>H
Input port .utput port
+apacitive stub +apacitive stub
Inductive stub
7, choke
7
*
*ypass
capacitor
*ipolar transistor
<ower supply
T=: CD+
Cector DA
1
A
B> at /.0 12
F"g'.e 4.14; )he amplifier gain, the markers are showing the gain at /.0 12.
)he amplifier phase shift simulated and measured values are plotted in
,igure > .=;, at /.0 12 they are AH0.H: and AI>.H: respectively. *y referring to
,igure > .=A, the measurement points i.e. the input and output ports are each
distanced by about =A.0 mm from the amplifier circuit due to the /.0 12 -uarter9
wavelength stubs originally for the resonant structure. )otal electrical length of the
two stubs is =I: at /.0 12, thus deducting this from the measured phase shift,
H . =:> =I: H . AI> is the actual phase shift due to the amplifier.
>I
F"g'.e 4.16; )he amplifier phase shift, the markers are phase shifts at /.0 12.
)he same S9parameters simulation above, 4
mA I
C
/:
6 gives a noise figure
4,6 of 0.J/ d* as shown above in ,igure > .=0. )he actual measured , is H.0I d*,
measured at a slightly offset fre-uency 4to avoid potential interference from other
/.0 12 signals. )he noise figure measurement setup is shown in # the noise source
4model < />0+6 is driven by the SA 4model Agilent E>>>:A with Doise ,igure
option6, its output is fed into the amplifier input and the amplifier output goes into
the SA 7, input. )he SA is set to noise figure mode for the noise figure
measurement.
>J
F"g'.e 4.16; Simulated and measured noise figure of the designed amplifier
F"g'.e 4.1=; )he amplifier noise figure measurement setup.
4.1.1 P&a(e N"(e
%eeson(s model of feedback oscillator noise spectrum as in Error: 7eference
source not found yields an appro!imate phase noise spectrum at the amplifier
output, "
.
4f
m
6 as :
;:
<ower supply
T=: CD+
Swept
SA
7,
1
A
Doise source
( )
,
_
+
1
1
]
1
,
_
+
m m L
O
m O
f
f
f Q
f
W f W
/
A
=
A
=
4.?
"here
"