in the Christ Court of Record

at Queens Bench
at the Crown Court building,
Canterbury Combined Court Centre
The Law Courts, Chaucer Road
at Canterbury, Kent. CT !"
case no.# #
notice# non$interference#
su%%lemental to#
common law writ&claim'
()erified*
Between#
i# a mere man# son and heir of + d through Christ# Christian , cp. -ulian -..' Prosecuter
.,c&o /turry Road ,01., at Canterbury, Kent, Kingdome of + d. .
(the masculine includes the feminine and the singular includes the %lural, henceforth*
a man# (who* sometimes act in the ca%acity of ,2%ublic$ser)ant & state$em%loyee3.' Wrongdoer
notice# non$interference'
the Christ Court deli)ers notice of the laws and customs of non$interference with common law writ&claim#
(3) When including any provision in an order under this section, the Lord Chancellor must have regard to
the principle that access to the courts must not be denied.
by virtue o 451(6* fees o the !Courts "ct 1776 c. 3"# and
by virtue o 481(6* fees o the !Constitutional Reform "ct 1778 c. $#%
&' reeman hall be ta(en, or imprioned, or be dieied o his reehold, or liberties, or ree cutoms, or be
outla)ed, or e*iled, or any other)ie detroyed% nor )ill )e not pas upon him, nor condemn him, but by
la)ul +udgment o his peers, or by the la) o the land. 9e will fell to no man, we will not deny or defer
to any man either :ustice or right,
7. 9e fhall fell to no man :uftice or right.
8. 9e fhall deny no man :uftice or right.
9. 9e fhall defer to no man :uftice or right.
ch. 3" o the -agna Carta, and p. $./0 o 1he 2nstitutes o the La)s o 3ngland, pt. 4, vol. 5, (564$)
Containing the 3*position o -any 7ncient and 'ther 8tatutes%
$. 9e may have an action o ale imprionment, l: 9. ;. ol. 5;. but it is entred in the court o common
pleas -ich. 55 9. ;. <ot. 34;. 9ilarie Warners cae, and it appeareth by the record, that +udgement )as
given or the plaintie= a record )orthy o obervation.
.. b9e may have a )rit de homine replegiando. >ide -arlebridge, cap. 6.
0. c9e might by the common/la) have had a )rit de odio, et atia, as you may ee beore, cap. 40, but that
)as ta(en a)ay by tatnte, but no) is revived againe by the latute o $4 3. 3, cap. 5. as there it alo
appeareth. 2t is aid in d W. 4. Sed ne hujufmodi appellati, vel indicati diu detineantur in prifona, habeat
breve de odio et atia, ficut in Magna Charta, et aliis ftatutis did3 eft : and by the faid act of ;1 <. 6. all
flatutes made againft =agna Charta are re%ealed.
(") Nulli vendemus, etc.# e 1his is po(en in the peron o the (ing, )ho in +udgement o la), in all his
courts o +ulice is preent, and repeating thee )ords, nulli vendemus, etc.
7nd thereore, e)ery fub:ect of this realme, for in:ury done to him in bonis, terris, vel perfona, by any
other fub:ect, be he ecclefiafticall, or tem%orall, free, >or bond, man, or woman, old, or young, or be
he outlawed, e?communicated, or any other without e?ce%tion, may ta@e his remedy by the courfe of
the law, and ha)e :uftice, and right for the in:ury done to him, freely without fale, fully without any
deniall, and f%eedily without delay.
9ereby it appeareth, that +ulice mut have three ?nalities, it mut be libera, quia nibil iniquins venali
juftitia non debet claudicare % et celeries, quia dilation eft quaedam negation % and then both +utice and
right. p. .0 o 1he 2nstitutes o the La)s o 3ngland, pt. 4, vol. 5, (564$) Containing the 3*position o
-any 7ncient and 'ther 8tatutes%
3. 7 third subordinate right o every 3nglishman is that o applying to the courts o +ustice or redress o
in+uries. 8ince the la) is in 3ngland the supreme arbiter o every man@s lie, liberty, and property, courts of
-ustice must at all times be o%en to the sub:ect, and the la) be duly administered therein. 1he emphatical
)ords o magna carta,(u) spo(en in the person o the (ing, )ho in +udgment o la) (says 8ir 3d)ard Co(e)
!Aage o 1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
22
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
1
()) is ever present and repeating them in all his courts, are these% nulli vendemus, nulli negabimus, aut
differemus rectum vel justitiam= and thereore e)ery sub:ect, continues the same learned author, for
in:ury done to him in bonis, in terris, vel persona, by any other sub+ect, be he ecclesiastical or temporal,
)ithout any e*ception, may ta@e his remedy by the course of the law, and ha)e :ustice and right for the
in:ury done to him, freely without sale, fully without any denial, and s%eedily without delay. 2t )ere
endless to enumerate all the affirmative acts o parliament, B)herein +ustice is directed to be done
according to the law of the land% and )hat that la) is every sub+ect (no)s, or may (no), i he pleases% or
it depends not upon the arbitrary )ill o any +udge, but is %ermanent, fi?ed, and unchangeable, unless by
authority o parliament. p. 5:" o Clac(stone@s Commentaries on the La)s o 3ngland (5;0.) vol. 5,
boo(s 5
nulli vendemus: we will not sell :ustice to any
nulli negabimus we will not deny :ustice to any
aut differemus rectum vel justitiam or delay right or :ustice to any
in bonis, in terris, vel persona either in his goods, lands, or %erson%
1o preserve these rom violation, it is necessary that the constitution o parliament be supported in its ull
vigour% and limits, certainly (no)n, be set to the royal prerogative. 7nd, lastly, to vindicate these rights,
)hen actually violated or attac(ed, the sub:ects of <ngland are entitled, in the irst place, to the regular
administration and free course of :ustice in the courts of law ne*t to the right o petitioning the (ing and
parliament or redress o grievances% and, lastly, to the right o having and using arms or sel/preservation
and deence. p. 554 o Clac(stone@s Commentaries on the La)s o 3ngland (5;0.) vol. 5, boo(s 5%
1he free use of all courts of record and not o record, is to be granted to the %eo%le
1. 3. 1omlins La) Dictionary%
and none o the aoresaid amercements shall be imposed e*cept by the oath of honest men of the
neighbourhood p. 46$ o the -agna Carta / 7 Commentary on the Ereat Charter o Fing Gohn )ith an
9istorical 2ntroduction (5"5$) by William 8harp -cFechnie, ed. 4%
rgumentum ab inconvenienti plurimum valet in lege! The %lea of incon)enience is, in law, the most
weighty. Nihil quod est inconveniens est licitum! Aothing which is incon)enient is lawful.
Clac(stoneHs Commentaries%
in conclusion' if any man claims that if i, %ay not a filing fee and thus acce%t a %ri)ate court3s
:urisdiction, said man does (by his own act in su%%ort of his claim* interfere with ,my. right to :ustice
and to mo)e my court of record in accordance to the course of the law and customs of the land, and is
therefore found to be single$handedly res%onsible, and liable for said interference which constitutes
tres%ass and tres%ass on the case, in contem%t of law, as a direct result of which, i, a man reBuire fair
and :ust com%ensation from said wrongdoer, in the sum of Cne +reat British Dound (E* %er second
of continued interference'
today ,cp. on the light of this Twenty$ninth day of the month of /e%tember of the year
Two$thousand$and$fourteen, ".F.. i, a mere man, son and heir of + d through Christ
Christian, Prosecuter, say here and will )erify in o%en court that all herein be true
and lastly any and all alterations initialled not by the undersigned are )oid
GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
a mere man
!Aage 1 o 1.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
1