Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
M
)
E
C
9
0
(
M
)
C
C
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
9
0
E
C
5
0
(
M
)
E
C
9
0
(
M
)
C
C
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
9
0
(
M
)
A
C
V
/
G
C
V
*
3
.
4
3
>
1
0
0
>
1
0
0
>
2
9
.
1
5
1
5
.
9
8
>
1
0
0
>
1
0
0
>
1
6
.
7
2
1
B
-
A
C
V
1
8
1
.
5
4
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
1
.
6
5
1
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
1
1
R
-
A
C
V
8
.
3
1
6
8
.
3
2
>
3
0
0
>
3
6
.
1
4
>
1
.
7
8
3
.
4
8
.
8
9
>
3
0
0
>
8
8
.
2
4
>
3
3
.
7
5
B
-
R
-
A
C
V
5
.
7
2
1
.
8
9
>
3
0
0
>
5
2
.
6
>
1
3
.
7
0
.
2
7
1
1
.
3
9
>
3
0
0
>
1
1
1
1
.
1
1
>
2
6
.
3
4
1
2
H
S
-
A
C
V
1
.
1
6
6
.
2
7
2
9
6
.
0
7
2
5
5
.
2
3
4
7
.
2
2
0
.
4
1
>
3
0
0
2
9
6
.
0
7
7
2
2
.
1
2
0
.
9
9
B
-
1
2
H
S
-
A
C
V
<
0
.
0
9
6
0
.
4
2
>
3
0
0
>
3
1
2
5
>
7
1
4
.
2
9
<
0
.
0
9
6
4
.
6
5
>
3
0
0
>
3
1
2
5
>
6
4
.
5
2
D
r
u
g
/
P
r
o
d
r
u
g
H
u
m
a
n
C
y
t
o
m
e
g
a
l
o
v
i
r
u
s
(
H
M
C
V
)
*
E
p
s
t
e
i
n
-
B
a
r
r
V
i
r
u
s
(
E
B
V
)
E
C
5
0
(
M
)
E
C
9
0
(
M
)
C
C
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
9
0
(
M
)
E
C
5
0
(
M
)
E
C
9
0
(
M
)
C
C
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
5
0
(
M
)
S
I
9
0
(
M
)
A
C
V
/
G
C
V
*
0
.
2
1
0
.
3
8
>
1
0
0
>
4
7
6
.
1
9
>
2
6
3
.
1
6
1
2
.
4
6
7
.
3
>
1
0
0
>
8
.
0
6
>
1
.
4
9
B
-
A
C
V
>
6
0
>
6
0
2
3
4
.
2
4
<
3
.
9
<
3
.
9
2
2
.
3
5
2
.
8
>
6
0
>
2
.
6
9
>
1
.
1
4
R
-
A
C
V
4
6
.
4
7
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
>
6
.
4
6
1
1
0
.
7
4
9
.
5
>
6
0
>
5
.
6
1
>
1
.
2
1
.
B
-
R
-
A
C
V
7
0
.
0
7
9
9
.
9
6
>
3
0
0
>
4
.
2
8
>
3
2
.
1
4
1
.
5
>
6
0
>
2
8
.
5
7
>
1
.
4
5
1
2
H
S
-
A
C
V
1
0
1
.
0
2
1
3
6
.
5
5
>
3
0
0
>
2
.
9
7
>
2
.
2
3
5
.
8
5
5
4
7
.
3
1
.
3
2
0
.
8
6
B
-
1
2
H
S
-
A
C
V
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
>
3
0
0
1
1
3
7
.
2
>
6
0
>
6
0
>
1
.
6
1
1
E
C
5
0
=
C
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
v
i
r
a
l
r
e
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
5
0
%
,
i
n
u
n
i
t
s
o
f
M
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
E
C
9
0
=
C
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
v
i
r
a
l
r
e
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
b
y
9
0
%
,
i
n
u
n
i
t
s
o
f
M
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
C
C
5
0
=
C
o
m
p
o
u
n
d
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
a
t
r
e
d
u
c
e
s
c
e
l
l
v
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
b
y
5
0
%
,
i
n
u
n
i
t
s
o
f
M
c
o
n
c
e
n
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
I
5
0
=
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
d
e
x
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
C
C
5
0
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
E
C
5
0
S
I
9
0
=
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
v
i
t
y
i
n
d
e
x
c
a
l
c
u
l
a
t
e
d
a
s
t
h
e
C
C
9
0
d
i
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
E
C
9
0
2074 Vadlapudi et al.
may probably be due to enhanced cellular accumulation into
the viral infected cells. On the other hand, B-R-ACV was
found to be more potent against viral strains of EBV and
could be a promising candidate for infections caused by
EBV. As expected, all the compounds tested in this study were
found to be inactive against viral strains of HCMV. Higher
selectivity indexes of both the biotinylated lipid prodrugs with
greater antiviral potency and lack of cytotoxicity to non-virus
infected cells makes these compounds highly favorable for
clinical development.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, biotinylated lipid prodrugs of ACV were suc-
cessfully designed and evaluated as potential drug candi-
dates against various herpes viruses. The overall aim of this
study was to improve the cellular absorption of ACV by
employing targeted lipid prodrug strategy and investigating
the feasibility of utilizing biotinylated lipid prodrugs for
corneal drug delivery. Biotinylated lipid prodrugs of ACV
have shown synergistic improvement in cellular uptake due
to recognition of the prodrugs by SMVT on the cornea and
lipid mediated transcellular diffusion. These compounds
displayed better tissue stability and minimal/no cytotoxicity.
Also, these novel compounds exhibited excellent antiviral
activity against HSV-1, HSV-2 and EBV. These biotinylated
lipid prodrugs appear to be promising drug candidates for the
treatment of HK and thus may lower ACV resistance in
patients with poor clinical response to therapy.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES
We would like to acknowledge Dr. Mark Prichard at The
University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) for conducting
the in vitro antiviral screening studies under NIH/NIAID
contract. Also, we would like to thank Dr. Christopher Tseng
and Miriam Perkins at National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) for their support. This work has
been supported by NIH grant R01EY009171. All these
prodrugs are currently under investigation by NIH/NIAID
for screening the in vivo antiviral efficacy in virus infected
animal models.
REFERENCES
1. Duan R, de Vries RD, Osterhaus AD, Remeijer L, Verjans GM.
Acyclovir-resistant corneal HSV-1 isolates from patients with her-
petic keratitis. J Infect Dis. 2008;198(5):65963.
2. Remeijer L, Osterhaus A, Verjans G. Human herpes simplex virus
keratitis: the pathogenesis revisited. Ocul Immunol Inflamm.
2004;12(4):25585.
3. Rowe AM, St. Leger AJ, Jeon S, Dhaliwal DK, Knickelbein JE,
Hendricks RL. Herpes keratitis. Progress in Retinal and Eye
Research. 2013;32(0):88101.
4. Piret J, Boivin G. Resistance of herpes simplex viruses to nucleo-
side analogues: mechanisms, prevalence, and management.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(2):45972.
5. Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, McQuillan GM, Lee FK, Nahmias
AJ, et al. Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprev-
alence in the United States. JAMA. 2006;296(8):96473.
6. Al -Duj ail i LJ, Cl erki n PP, Cl ement C, McFerri n HE,
Bhattacharjee PS, Varnell ED, et al. Ocular herpes simplex virus:
how are latency, reactivation, recurrent disease and therapy inter-
related? Future Microbiol. 2011;6(8):877907.
7. Webre JM, Hill JM, Nolan NM, Clement C, McFerrin HE,
Bhattacharjee PS, et al. Rabbit and mouse models of HSV-1
latency, reactivation, and recurrent eye diseases. J Biomed
Biotechnol. 2012;2012:612316.
8. Vadlapudi AD, Vadlapatla RK. Mitra AK. Update On Emerging
Antivirals For The Management Of Herpes Simplex Virus
Infections: A Patenting Perspective. Recent Pat Antiinfect Drug
Discov. 2013;8(1):5567.
9. Kennedy DP, Clement C, Arceneaux RL, Bhattacharjee PS, Huq
TS, Hill JM. Ocular herpes simplex virus type 1: is the cornea a
reservoir for viral latency or a fast pit stop? Cornea. 2011;30(3):2519.
10. Kennedy DP, Clement C, Arceneaux RL, Bhattacharjee PS, Huq
TS, Hill JM. Ocular Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1: Is the Cornea
a Reservoir for Viral Latency or a Fast Pit Stop? Cornea. 2010.
doi:10.1097/01.ico.0000391265.52134.f0
11. Cantin EM, Chen J, McNeill J, Willey DE, Openshaw H.
Detection of herpes simplex virus DNA sequences in corneal
transplant recipients by polymerase chain reaction assays. Curr
Eye Res. 1991;10(Suppl):1521.
12. Easty DL, Shimeld C, Claoue CM, Menage M. Herpes simplex
virus isolation in chronic stromal keratitis: human and laboratory
studies. Curr Eye Res. 1987;6(1):6974.
13. Coupes D, Klapper PE, Cleator GM, Bailey AS, Tullo AB.
Herpesvirus simplex in chronic human stromal keratitis. Curr
Eye Res. 1986;5(10):7358.
14. Tullo AB, Easty DL, Shimeld C, Stirling PE, Darville JM. Isolation of
herpes simplex virus fromcorneal discs of patients with chronic stromal
keratitis. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1985;104(Pt 2):15965.
15. Shimeld C, Tullo AB, Easty DL, Thomsitt J. Isolation of herpes
simplex virus from the cornea in chronic stromal keratitis. Br J
Ophthalmol. 1982;66(10):6437.
16. Thuret G, Acquart S, Gain P, Dumollard JM, Manissolle C,
Campos-Guyotat L, et al. Ultrastructural demonstration of repli-
cative herpes simplex virus type 1 transmission through corneal
graft. Transplantation. 2004;77(2):3256.
17. Remeijer L, Maertzdorf J, Doornenbal P, Verjans GM, Osterhaus
AD. Herpes simplex virus 1 transmission through corneal trans-
plantation. Lancet. 2001;357(9254):442.
18. Openshaw H, McNeill JI, Lin XH, Niland J, Cantin EM. Herpes
simplex virus DNA in normal corneas: persistence without viral
shedding from ganglia. J Med Virol. 1995;46(1):7580.
19. Kaufman HE, Azcuy AM, Varnell ED, Sloop GD, Thompson
HW, Hill JM. HSV-1 DNA in tears and saliva of normal adults.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(1):2417.
20. Abiko Y, Ikeda M, Hondo R. Secretion and dynamics of herpes
simplex virus in tears and saliva of patients with Bells palsy. Otol
Neurotol. 2002;23(5):77983.
21. Yamamoto S, Shimomura Y, Kinoshita S, Nishida K, Yamamoto R,
Tano Y. Detection of herpes simplex virus DNAin human tear filmby
the polymerase chain reaction. AmJ Ophthalmol. 1994;117(2):1603.
22. Uchoa UB, Rezende RA, Carrasco MA, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR,
Cohen EJ. Long-termacyclovir use to prevent recurrent ocular herpes
simplex virus infection. Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(12):17024.
In Vitro Evaluation of Biotinylated Lipid Prodrugs of ACV 2075
23. Liesegang TJ. Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular im-
portance. Cornea. 2001;20(1):113.
24. Anand BS, Mitra AK. Mechanism of corneal permeation of L-
valyl ester of acyclovir: targeting the oligopeptide transporter on
the rabbit cornea. Pharm Res. 2002;19(8):1194202.
25. Bacon TH, Levin MJ, Leary JJ, Sarisky RT, Sutton D. Herpes
simplex virus resistance to acyclovir and penciclovir after two de-
cades of antiviral therapy. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003;16(1):11428.
26. Morfin F, Thouvenot D. Herpes simplex virus resistance to
antiviral drugs. J Clin Virol. 2003;26(1):2937.
27. Choong K, Walker NJ, Apel AJ, Whitby M. Aciclovir-resistant
herpes keratitis. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38(3):30913.
28. Wilson SS, Fakioglu E, Herold BC. Novel approaches in fighting
herpes simplex virus infections. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther.
2009;7(5):55968.
29. Vadlapudi AD, Vadlapatla RK, Kwatra D, Earla R, Samanta SK,
Pal D, et al. Targeted lipid based drug conjugates: A novel strategy
for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2012;434(12):31524.
30. Karla PK, Quinn TL, Herndon BL, Thomas P, Pal D, Mitra A.
Expression of multidrug resistance associated protein 5 (MRP5) on
cornea and its role in drug efflux. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther.
2009;25(2):12132.
31. Vadlapudi AD, Vadlapatla RK, Pal D, Mitra AK. Functional and
Molecular Aspects of Biotin Uptake via SMVT in Human Corneal
Epithelial (HCEC) and Retinal Pigment Epithelial (D407) Cells.
AAPS J. 2012;14(4):83242.
32. Janoria KG, Hariharan S, Paturi D, Pal D, Mitra AK. Biotin
uptake by rabbit corneal epithelial cells: role of sodium-
dependent multivitamin transporter (SMVT). Curr Eye Res.
2006;31(10):797809.
33. Dey S, Patel J, Anand BS, Jain-Vakkalagadda B, Kaliki P, Pal D, et
al. Molecular evidence and functional expression of P-glycoprotein
(MDR1) in human and rabbit cornea and corneal epithelial cell
lines. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44(7):290918.
34. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for
automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc.
2010;5(4):72538.
35. Zhang Y. I-TASSER: fully automated protein structure prediction
in CASP8. Proteins. 2009;77 Suppl 9:10013.
36. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.
BMC Bioinforma. 2008;9:40.
37. Trott O, Olson AJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and
accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimi-
zation, and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010;31(2):45561.
38. Katragadda S, Talluri RS, Mitra AK. Simultaneous modulation of
transport and metabolism of acyclovir prodrugs across rabbit cor-
nea: An approach involving enzyme inhibitors. Int J Pharm.
2006;320(12):10413 [Comparative Study Research Support,
N.I.H., Extramural].
39. Tak RV, Pal D, Gao H, Dey S, Mitra AK. Transport of acyclovir
ester prodrugs through rabbit cornea and SIRC-rabbit corneal
epi thel i al cel l l i ne. J Pharm Sci . 2001; 90( 10) : 150515
[Comparative Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.].
40. Earla R, Boddu SH, Cholkar K, Hariharan S, Jwala J, Mitra AK.
Development and validation of a fast and sensitive bioanalytical
method for the quantitative determination of glucocorticoids
quantitative measurement of dexamethasone in rabbit ocular ma-
trices by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. J
Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010;52(4):52533.
41. Prichard MN, Keith KA, Quenelle DC, Kern ER. Activity and
mechanism of action of N-methanocarbathymidine against herpes-
virus and orthopoxvirus infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.
2006;50(4):133641.
42. Prichard MN, Daily SL, Jefferson GM, Perry AL, Kern ER. A rapid
DNA hybridization assay for the evaluation of antiviral compounds
against Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol Methods. 2007;144(12):8690.
43. Gill RB, Frederick SL, Hartline CB, Chou S, Prichard MN.
Conserved retinoblastoma protein-binding motif in human cyto-
megalovirus UL97 kinase minimally impacts viral replication but
affects susceptibility to maribavir. Virol J. 2009;6:9.
44. Dias CS, Anand BS, Mitra AK. Effect of mono- and di-acylation
on the ocular disposition of ganciclovir: physicochemical proper-
ties, ocular bioreversion, and antiviral activity of short chain ester
prodrugs. J Pharm Sci. 2002;91(3):6608.
45. Lambert DM. Rationale and applications of lipids as prodrug
carriers. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2000;11 Suppl 2:S1527.
46. Chang SC, Lee VH. Influence of chain length on the in vitro
hydrolysis of model ester prodrugs by ocular esterases. Curr Eye
Res. 1982;2(10):6516.
47. Talluri RS, Hariharan S, Karla PK, Mitra AK. Drug delivery to
cornea and conjunctiva-esterase and protease directed prodrug design.
In: Dartt DA, Bex P, DAmore P, Dana R, Mcloon L &Niederkorn J,
editors. Ocular Periphery and Disorders. San Deigo, California, USA:
Elsevier, Academic Press Elsevier Ltd; 2011. p. 303314.
48. Atluri H, Tirucherai GS, Dias CS, Patel J, Mitra AK. Ocular, Nasal,
Pulmonary, and Otic Routes of Drug Delivery. In: Bhaskara R, Jasti
and Tapash K, editors. Theory and Practice of Contemporary
Pharmaceutics, Ghosh, CRC Press; 2004. p. 479524.
2076 Vadlapudi et al.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without
permission.